On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 01:07:40PM -0500, Jonathon Doran wrote:
> Quoting Jeremy Allison :
>
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 09:58:51AM -0700, Lance Gropper wrote:
>>> Hello Jeremy:
>>>
>>> Only 4GB RAM...
>>
>> Try doing the same thing against Samba with a Linux
>> client (using CIFSFS). If it works
Quoting Jeremy Allison :
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 09:58:51AM -0700, Lance Gropper wrote:
Hello Jeremy:
Only 4GB RAM...
Try doing the same thing against Samba with a Linux
client (using CIFSFS). If it works correctly then
you are running into a Windows client bug.
would smbclient be an appr
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 09:58:51AM -0700, Lance Gropper wrote:
> Hello Jeremy:
>
> Only 4GB RAM...
Try doing the same thing against Samba with a Linux
client (using CIFSFS). If it works correctly then
you are running into a Windows client bug.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Hello Jeremy:
Only 4GB RAM...
Lance
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:19 AM, Lance Gropper
wrote:
> Hello Jeremy:
>
> I'll have to check - I don't know for sure, but I think the client has 16GB
> RAM...
>
> Lance
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at
Hello Jeremy:
I'll have to check - I don't know for sure, but I think the client has 16GB
RAM...
Lance
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 07:37:15PM -0700, Lance Gropper wrote:
> > Hello Jeremy:
> > Is it possible the problem could be due to low RA
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 07:37:15PM -0700, Lance Gropper wrote:
> Hello Jeremy:
> Is it possible the problem could be due to low RAM in the Linux server? It
> has 6GB RAM total, and each Raid volume takes about 1.1GB - only 3 are up at
> the moment, so aside from the OS, 3.3GB of RAM is used...
To
Hello Jeremy:
Is it possible the problem could be due to low RAM in the Linux server? It
has 6GB RAM total, and each Raid volume takes about 1.1GB - only 3 are up at
the moment, so aside from the OS, 3.3GB of RAM is used...
Lance
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Lance Gropper
wrote:
> Hello Jere
Hello Jeremy:
I don't have a problem with your response time - you and John responded more
rapidly to my request than I expected. I had to read the docs to find out
how to set the debug level option, and did post the log. I'm sorry to hear
about your family member.
Lance
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:32:40PM -0700, Lance Gropper wrote:
> Hello Helmut:
>
> The VP won't let me post the file. I don't want to sound critical here, but
> how come John and Jeremy did not know that the debuglevel option was not in
> the config file, or what the log file was called?
Huh ? I
To: Helmut Hullen
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] File Size Limit - Why/How?
Hello Helmut:
The VP won't let me post the file. I don't want to sound critical here, but
how come John and Jeremy did not know that the debuglevel option was not in
the config file, or what th
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Lance
Gropper wrote:
> Hello John:
>
> Were you able to retrieve the log file from the server?
>
I got it directly to my email. I looked at it and did not see any
thing that looked out of the ordinary. Jeremy Allison is a developer
so hopefully he has more ideas.
Hello John:
Were you able to retrieve the log file from the server?
Lance
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:38 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Lance
> Gropper wrote:
> > Hello Helmut:
> >
> > The VP won't let me post the file. I don't want to sound critical here,
> but
> >
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Lance
Gropper wrote:
> Hello Helmut:
>
> The VP won't let me post the file. I don't want to sound critical here, but
> how come John and Jeremy did not know that the debuglevel option was not in
> the config file, or what the log file was called? I'm in the middle o
Hello Helmut:
The VP won't let me post the file. I don't want to sound critical here, but
how come John and Jeremy did not know that the debuglevel option was not in
the config file, or what the log file was called? I'm in the middle of a
very serious data recovery operation, and need help pretty
Hello Helmut:
I don't know - I had enough trouble sending this file - the file is from a
highly-secure system with no internet access. I'm waiting for the VP in
charge to get in before I can ask...
Lance
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> Hallo, Lance,
>
> Du meintest am
Hallo, Lance,
Du meintest am 22.07.09:
> I received a message back saying the message I sent you with the log
> is waiting for moderator approval (It was about 500KB)...
Can you put it on a web side and show only the link to it in this
mailing list. 500 kByte mail downloading is no fun ...
Vi
Hello John/Jeremy:
I received a message back saying the message I sent you with the log is
waiting for moderator approval (It was about 500KB)...
Lance
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Hello John and Jeremy:
It'll have to be tomorrow - The arrays are busy right now running a test to
see if the "limit" is 2TB...100GB works.
Lance
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 6:38 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> > How do I do that?
> >
> Set your debug level in smb.conf to 10
>
> and post the contents o
> How do I do that?
>
Set your debug level in smb.conf to 10
and post the contents of /var/log/samba/smbd.log
You probably want to stop samba delete this file then restart samba
and then try your file operation.
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instruct
Hello Jeremy:
How do I do that?
Lance
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 04:57:26PM -0700, Lance Gropper wrote:
> > Hello Samba Lists:
> >
> > I am trying to read a 22TB file from a system running OpenSuSE 10.3/x64
> > (Using whatever version of S
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 04:57:26PM -0700, Lance Gropper wrote:
> Hello Samba Lists:
>
> I am trying to read a 22TB file from a system running OpenSuSE 10.3/x64
> (Using whatever version of Samba came out with 10.3/x64). The file is on a
> 30TB XFS volume. I'm connecting over 10GBit Ethernet from a
I already did it ( ..-o =ABCD,password=AZERTY,lfs )
and i dont have mount.cifs on my system (it is an old mandrake kernel
2.4.20)
Thanks for answers
2.4.20-312008/11/20 Adam Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> smbmount it with the -o lfs option
>
> Yassine AYACHI wrote:
>
>> Thank you for
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Yassine AYACHI
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you for the quick response !
> In fact i want to create an image with dd on the mounted hard drive ( dd
> if=/dev/zero of=//.img bs=1024k count=95000 )
>
> ( my img file have 95 Gb... )
>
> So I cant use sam
smbmount it with the -o lfs option
Yassine AYACHI wrote:
Thank you for the quick response !
In fact i want to create an image with dd on the mounted hard drive ( dd
if=/dev/zero of=//.img bs=1024k count=95000 )
( my img file have 95 Gb... )
So I cant use samba to do my manipulation :(
Thank you for the quick response !
In fact i want to create an image with dd on the mounted hard drive ( dd
if=/dev/zero of=//.img bs=1024k count=95000 )
( my img file have 95 Gb... )
So I cant use samba to do my manipulation :(
thanks a lot.
Yassine.
2008/11/20 Iarly Selbir <[EMAIL PR
If you want only copy any file very larger size, you can use the smbclient
to transfer this file, the smbmount has this limitation.
Reggards,
--
iarly Selbir ( Ski0s )
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Yassine AYACHI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi all,
> I mount
On Saturday 20 May 2006 23:49, Hans du Plooy wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 23:32 +0100, Dave S wrote:
> > I am using 2.6.12 kernel, fat 32 on windows but not on my other ubuntu
> > machine :)
>
> If memory serves me right, fat32 doesn't support larger than 2GB. Also,
> as far as I remember, if yo
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 23:32 +0100, Dave S wrote:
> I am using 2.6.12 kernel, fat 32 on windows but not on my other ubuntu
> machine :)
If memory serves me right, fat32 doesn't support larger than 2GB. Also,
as far as I remember, if you mount with smbfs, there was an option
("lfs" maybe) that sup
On Saturday 20 May 2006 16:34, Dave S wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am running samba 3.0.14 on ubuntu breezy badger networked with another
> ubuntu machine and my XP laptop.
>
> File sharing is great except when a file exceeds 1.5 - 2 GB. The file
> transfer fails after 1.5 - 2 GB with a file to large er
Dave S wrote:
Hi all,
I am running samba 3.0.14 on ubuntu breezy badger networked with another
ubuntu machine and my XP laptop.
File sharing is great except when a file exceeds 1.5 - 2 GB. The file transfer
fails after 1.5 - 2 GB with a file to large error. This seems to be a limit
for li
Dave S wrote:
Hi all,
I am running samba 3.0.14 on ubuntu breezy badger networked with another
ubuntu machine and my XP laptop.
File sharing is great except when a file exceeds 1.5 - 2 GB. The file transfer
fails after 1.5 - 2 GB with a file to large error. This seems to be a limit
for li
are you running kernel 2.4 or 2.6?
Dave S wrote:
Hi all,
I am running samba 3.0.14 on ubuntu breezy badger networked with another
ubuntu machine and my XP laptop.
File sharing is great except when a file exceeds 1.5 - 2 GB. The file transfer
fails after 1.5 - 2 GB with a file to large erro
> -Original Message-
> From: djfogbr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> My problem is: when I try to mount an w2k share in this
> machine using smbmount, I can't see big files correctly. I
> suspect that the problem happens with files bigger then 2GB.
> I have a file in the w2k machine that'
Courtesy of a quick google search.
http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/~errror/smbfs-lfs.html
On Thu, 29 May 2003, [iso-8859-1] djfogbr wrote:
Hi all,
We have a Debian Linux 3.0, running kernel 2.4.18, and all filesystems are formatted
as ext3.
My problem is: when I try to mount an w2k share in this mac
So it appears that Samba supports large filesystems, but not large
files. Is this a configuration issue or a 32bit limitation in Samba??
This isn't a samba (server) issue; rather it's an smbmount
and kernel (client) issue. You need the patches at
http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/
--
To un
On January 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> The linux box can see the large Windows files, but does not see their
>
> correct sizes -- it reports an absurdly big size when using ls -l. Files
> less
>
> that 2GB show up correctly. Trying to create a 3G file on the Windows box
>
> from the linux box
36 matches
Mail list logo
