Good day, one and all ...
I just had to rebuild our main Samba server (OpenSlowlaris - Slowlaris
11.11), during which I put the latest (at the time; currently
4.2.0pre1-GIT-b505111) Samba4 on there. I thought that by now that Gunther's
speculative changes to improve the PAC decode might have
So it seems that with these changes, kerberos_decode_pac() is never
entered with client_principal anything other than a NULL pointer.
So I'm (very) happy that these changes fix my problem. However it
does seem a little curious that client_principal now never appears
to be set - I
On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 17:20 +, Tris Mabbs wrote:
Hello again everyone,
On 08 March 2013 13:10, Michael Wood wrote:
...
---Cut here.
Sorry, I forgot a step. You would have needed a git fetch gd in there
before the checkout.
Ah ha! That would explain it then.
Well,
Hiya Andrew, Günther,
Andrew, many thanks for following up on this.
Where did we get with this?
Currently stalled, temporarily I'm sure, by my ignorance of git I'm
afraid.
Günther pointed me at a branch with some changes but I've been unable to
find it, either through the Samba GitWeb view on
On 8 March 2013 11:03, Tris Mabbs tm-samba201...@firstgrade.co.uk wrote:
Hiya Andrew, Günther,
Andrew, many thanks for following up on this.
Where did we get with this?
Currently stalled, temporarily I'm sure, by my ignorance of git I'm
afraid.
If you have no local changes, try this:
Hiya Michael,
Many thanks for that - very much appreciated.
I think I should learn more about git than currently I know - however this
is not the time to do so.
So I ran your commands, first not worrying about any local changes so just
updating my local copy:
---Cut here:
samba-master % git
Hi
On 8 March 2013 13:37, Tris Mabbs tm-samba201...@firstgrade.co.uk wrote:
Hiya Michael,
Many thanks for that - very much appreciated.
I think I should learn more about git than currently I know - however this
is not the time to do so.
So I ran your commands, first not worrying about any
Hello again everyone,
On 08 March 2013 13:10, Michael Wood wrote:
...
---Cut here.
Sorry, I forgot a step. You would have needed a git fetch gd in there
before the checkout.
Ah ha! That would explain it then.
Well, forgotten command or not, the help was much appreciated and I now have
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 22:33 +, Tris Mabbs wrote:
Hiya Günther,
Absolutely - I'm really sorry, I intended to try this today but haven't had
the chance.
Hopefully I will get the chance tomorrow, and I'll let you know the results.
Many thanks, much appreciated :-)
Where did we get
Hi Triss,
can you test this branch?
https://git.samba.org/?p=gd/samba/.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master-krb5pac
It contains fixes for various pac buffer types.
Let us know if it resolves your issues.
Thanks,
Guenther
--
Günther DeschnerGPG-ID: 8EE11688
Red Hat
Hiya Günther,
Absolutely - I'm really sorry, I intended to try this today but haven't had
the chance.
Hopefully I will get the chance tomorrow, and I'll let you know the results.
Many thanks, much appreciated :-)
Tris.
-Original Message-
From: Guenther Deschner [mailto:g...@samba.org]
I do so enjoy working with users who I can ask to 'put some code in' and who
can handle this so well :-).
Why thank you, kind Sir :-)
I do so enjoy working with people who quite obviously really, REALLY, know
their subject :-)
In my case, evidence only of far too many years stuck in front of a
I do so enjoy working with users who I can ask to 'put some code in' and who
can handle this so well :-).
TM Why thank you, kind Sir :-)
TM I do so enjoy working with people who quite obviously really, REALLY, know
their subject :-)
TM In my case, evidence only of far too many years stuck
I do so enjoy working with users who I can ask to 'put some code in' and who
can handle this so well :-).
Why thank you, kind Sir :-)
I do so enjoy working with people who quite obviously really, REALLY, know
their subject :-) In my case, evidence only of far too many years stuck in
front of
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 11:51 +, Tris Mabbs wrote:
Hello,
We're having a problem with Samba 4 joined to a Server 2008 R2 domain
(at Server 2008 functional level across the forest).
The interesting thing is that this only affects a single user - all other
accounts work without
Wow.
Hiya Andrew,
OK, this sounds like a very promising approach, and potentially saves me
working through a large number of git bisects (as also most helpfully
suggested by Michael Wood) - so far, I'm right back into the beta code and
there have been a lot of commits since then...
I'm not
On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 11:22 +, Tris Mabbs wrote:
Wow.
Hiya Andrew,
OK, this sounds like a very promising approach, and potentially saves me
working through a large number of git bisects (as also most helpfully
suggested by Michael Wood) - so far, I'm right back into the beta code
What I was getting at about the full name is that if this was a odd character
encoding issue, knowing that this was a user with non-ascii full name would
be an important data point.
Yes, I see what you mean.
No, neither the full username, nor the login name, contain anything other than
Hi
You might try getting a packet capture.
By the way, what's common between the user before you deleted the
account and the one you created later, besides the username? The
password? Can you replicate this in a test environment?
If you can replicate this in a test environment and you know
Hiya Michael,
Many thanks for the quick and helpful response.
Yes, I can certainly try a packet capture; I think I'll go with your other
suggestion first though, that of using git bisect to track down the
problematic version.
I'm sorry, that should have occurred to me .
Once I've
20 matches
Mail list logo
