On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 14:32 +0100, Fred F wrote:
Thanks for your statement, Andrew. I know about winbind and we've used
it in the past, but I remember there were some issues when dealing
with POSIX ACLs and windbind.
Now while winbind might work in some environments, I think it would be
Thanks for your statement, Andrew. I know about winbind and we've used
it in the past, but I remember there were some issues when dealing
with POSIX ACLs and windbind.
Now while winbind might work in some environments, I think it would be
much nicer and cleaner to integrate Linux clients into a
2013/1/22 Gémes Géza g...@kzsdabas.hu:
I don't agree, because users can be members of multiple groups, not just the
group identified as their primary group
Well, yes. That is not the point. Users can still be members of
multiple groups (e.g. CN=Domain Admins,CN=Users,CN=DOMAIN), through
the
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 18:29 +0100, Fred F wrote:
2013/1/22 Gémes Géza g...@kzsdabas.hu:
I don't agree, because users can be members of multiple groups, not just the
group identified as their primary group
Well, yes. That is not the point. Users can still be members of
multiple groups (e.g.
2013-01-22 15:52 keltezéssel, Fred F írta:
Hi,
I am still experimenting with Samba 4 and I'd like to serve both
Windows and Linux clients with Samba (standalone AD server). The
Windows-side is already working well. For serving Linux-clients I need
to store the users' uidNumber and gidNumber in
