Now why don't you just use D-Spam as recommended before?
Now I get more Spam on this list, because of this discussion, than the
Nazi-Spam ever was.
D-Spam solves the problem.
But I can't tell it now, that this discussion is Spam,
because then I would risk to loose non Nazi-Spam samba-mails.
So
C'mom everyone, the complaints about this are starting to generate more noise
than the spam.
Jan Kellerhoff wrote:
Now why don't you just use D-Spam as recommended before?
Now I get more Spam on this list, because of this discussion, than the
Nazi-Spam ever was.
D-Spam solves the problem.
But I
-Original Message-
From: JLB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd go further and cut down on membership to people emailing from
non-Windows systems (including Webmail systems, until someone
invents a worm that spreads through those...)
Okay, I'm sorry, but that's the dumbest idea yet.
On Tue, 17 May 2005, David Brodbeck wrote:
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 10:31:38 -0400
From: David Brodbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] Re: nazi spam in German over list address
-Original Message-
From: JLB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd go
-Original Message-
From: JLB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having Windows and transmitting emails from a Windows
machine are two
totally different things.
Many Windows users use Hotmail, Gmail, Yahoo, corporate Webmail, etc.
Actually, according to p0f, Hotmail is running Windows
søn, 15.05.2005 kl. 18.46 skrev Jerome Alet:
Personally I kill this stuff with dspam, thanks to my MTA Postfix. Same
as with all the other spam and shit that gets posted here.
I too use DSpam.
DSpam is VERY good, however it voluntarily takes into account the
messages' headers during
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 15 May 2005, Jerome Alet wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 11:41:36PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 15:00 +0200, Lars Grobe wrote:
Unfortunately we are all to well aware of this problem, but as the long-
At 08:36 AM 5/16/2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
What about ... changing this long standing policy ???
(I've already read the reson for the actual policy)
If its not spam, then it will be virus that forge headers
and claim to come from a list members
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin M. Barrett wrote:
|
| Has any consideration been made to converting the
| list to a forum?
There's already Samba forums around so another one
would not be extremely helpful IMO. Plus the preference
for forum vs. mailing list is linked to
On May 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
All
Has any consideration been made to converting the list to a forum? in that
way everyone can just check the web site instead of checking the
inbox? For those folk who rather read the mail most forum software can
Somewhat off-topic for the list, and
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
If its not spam, then it will be virus that forge headers
and claim to come from a list members address. There is no
silver bullet to solve this issue without moderating every
post.
But if the policy was only subscriber posting then, we would know
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 15:00 +0200, Lars Grobe wrote:
Hi,
whoever is able to unsubscribe addresses from the list: I am currently
getting lots of spam with nazi content over this mailing list.
Unfortunately we are all to well aware of this problem, but as the long-
standing
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Daniel S. Haischt
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 11:56 AM
To: Andrew Bartlett
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Lars Grobe
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: nazi spam in German over list address
Andrew Bartlett
At 09:50 AM Monday, 5/16/2005, you wrote -=
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
If its not spam, then it will be virus that forge headers
and claim to come from a list members address. There is no
silver bullet to solve this issue without moderating every
post.
But if the policy was
And add the reply-to [EMAIL PROTECTED], there is too much accidental off
list traffic.
-Jason Pyeron
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Ed Kasky wrote:
At 09:50 AM Monday, 5/16/2005, you wrote -=
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
If its not spam, then it will be virus that forge headers
and
-Original Message-
From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And add the reply-to [EMAIL PROTECTED], there is too much
accidental off
list traffic.
I disagree. Changing it will create accidental on-list traffic, which
inconveniences far more people. It's not like replying to
I dont care anymore,
bye.
On Mon, 16 May 2005, David Brodbeck wrote:
And add the reply-to [EMAIL PROTECTED], there is too much
accidental off
list traffic.
I disagree. Changing it will create accidental on-list traffic, which
inconveniences far more people. It's not like replying to the list is
On May 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Basically if re-training your SPAM filter does not help and
one really wants to get rid of all those junk mails, installing
a challenge/response system like TMDA behind a statistical
filter (e.g. DSPAM) would be a possible solution ...
Please don't do
Hey,
yesterday (on 05/15/2005 at 15:41) you noticed:
AB I'm sorry we can't do much more about this,
AFAI can see from the headers, samba.org uses Spamassassin.
There is already a cf-file available to filter this current
nazi-stuff.
I use it for a day now and it works well so far.
No solution
Daniel S. Haischt wrote:
Basically if re-training your SPAM filter does not help and
one really wants to get rid of all those junk mails, installing
a challenge/response system like TMDA behind a statistical
filter (e.g. DSPAM) would be a possible solution ...
No. All that a challenge response
At 11:19 AM Monday, 5/16/2005, Jason Pyeron wrote -=
And add the reply-to [EMAIL PROTECTED], there is too much accidental off
list traffic.
-Jason Pyeron
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Ed Kasky wrote:
At 09:50 AM Monday, 5/16/2005, you wrote -=
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
If its not
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Ed Kasky wrote:
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 10:47:34 -0700
From: Ed Kasky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jason Pyeron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: nazi spam in German over list address
Resent-Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 13:58:52 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-From: Jason Pyeron [EMAIL
On Mon, 16 May 2005, JLB wrote:
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 21:52:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: JLB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ed Kasky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jason Pyeron [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: nazi spam in German over list address
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Ed Kasky wrote:
Date: Mon
Good idea!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JLB
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 7:54 PM
To: Ed Kasky
Cc: Jason Pyeron; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: nazi spam in German over list address
On Mon, 16 May 2005, JLB wrote:
Date: Mon
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: nazi spam in German over list address
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Ed Kasky wrote:
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 10:47:34 -0700
From: Ed Kasky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jason Pyeron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: nazi spam in German over list address
Resent-Date: Mon, 16 May
Locking out the Windows folks is counterproductive--those are exactly the
ones we're trying to attract away from MS, for that's the only way we'll
beat MS--by converting its customers.
And now I'm done with this thread; I'm more interested in learning Samba.
Eric Hines
At 05/16/05 21:12, you
On Monday 16 May 2005 19:29, Eric Hines wrote:
Locking out the Windows folks is counterproductive--those are exactly the
ones we're trying to attract away from MS, for that's the only way we'll
beat MS--by converting its customers.
Everybody who receives this samba email signed up for it. Why
Hi,
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 11:41:36PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 15:00 +0200, Lars Grobe wrote:
Unfortunately we are all to well aware of this problem, but as the long-
standing policy of samba.org lists is to allow public posting, we are
between a rock and a hard
Or offering a simple rebuttal
I watched this recently :
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/camp/
Memory of the Camps , you can watch the whole thing online.
Those who haven't seen it might want to, especially if you haven't
been to a holocaust memorial.
adam
On 5/15/05, Jerome Alet [EMAIL
How can we go about changing the long standing policy of anyone can
post?
Do we need a vote? if so who can vote and what percentage would be needed?
Does one person make a decision? if so who?
-Jason Pyeron
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-
Jason Pyeron wrote:
How can we go about changing the long standing policy of anyone can post?
Do we need a vote? if so who can vote and what percentage would be needed?
Does one person make a decision? if so who?
I don't think this decision is needed. Someone just needs to update the
søn, 15.05.2005 kl. 16.38 skrev Adam Cody:
Or offering a simple rebuttal
I watched this recently :
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/camp/
Memory of the Camps , you can watch the whole thing online.
Those who haven't seen it might want to, especially if you haven't
been to a
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 06:21:08PM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
Personally I kill this stuff with dspam, thanks to my MTA Postfix. Same
as with all the other spam and shit that gets posted here.
I too use DSpam.
DSpam is VERY good, however it voluntarily takes into account the
messages'
33 matches
Mail list logo
