On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 10:10:18AM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
I'm using ldapsam:ldap://server as my passdb backend, so I'm not sure
why it's showing the user this message instead. I see I can edit the
values that Samba is showing the user with pdbedit, but I shouldn't need
to edit that - my
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 10:10:18AM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
I'm using ldapsam:ldap://server as my passdb backend, so I'm not sure
why it's showing the user this message instead. I see I can edit the
values that Samba is showing the user with pdbedit, but I
I'm using ldapsam:ldap://server as my passdb backend, so I'm not sure
why it's showing the user this message instead. I see I can edit the
values that Samba is showing the user with pdbedit, but I shouldn't need
to edit that - my password policy is defined in LDAP, and those are the
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:40:33AM -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
How are these policies exactly defined in LDAP? Are they
visible for LDAP clients?
It's an explicit entry in LDAP:
ppolicy support in Samba would be awesome. Would make PCI/DSS (and
other regulatory compliance)
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 17:54 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:40:33AM -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
How are these policies exactly defined in LDAP? Are they
visible for LDAP clients?
It's an explicit entry in LDAP:
ppolicy support in Samba would be
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 11:57 -0400, simo wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 17:54 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:40:33AM -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
How are these policies exactly defined in LDAP? Are they
visible for LDAP clients?
It's an explicit entry
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 15:11 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 11:57 -0400, simo wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 17:54 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:40:33AM -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
How are these policies exactly defined in LDAP?
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 03:19:00PM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
It's not defined in my Samba source, but I guess that was the wrong
place to look. On my system, /usr/include/ldap.h does in fact have that
defined. However, Samba still returns NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL,
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 03:19:00PM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
It's not defined in my Samba source, but I guess that was the wrong
place to look. On my system, /usr/include/ldap.h does in fact have that
defined. However, Samba still returns NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL,
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 04:47:56PM -0400, John Drescher wrote:
I think the bug/problem is that this message is being displayed
instead of Password could not be changed for user
tester: Constraint violation and does not pass required number of
strength checks (1
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 02:03:32PM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
#if defined(LDAP_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION)
if (rc == LDAP_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION)
return NT_STATUS_PASSWORD_RESTRICTION;
#endif
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 02:03:32PM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
#if defined(LDAP_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION)
if (rc == LDAP_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION)
return NT_STATUS_PASSWORD_RESTRICTION;
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 03:19:00PM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
It's not defined in my Samba source, but I guess that was the wrong
place to look. On my system, /usr/include/ldap.h does in fact have that
defined. However, Samba still returns NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL, and
Windows still reports
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 04:47:56PM -0400, John Drescher wrote:
I think the bug/problem is that this message is being displayed
instead of Password could not be changed for user
tester: Constraint violation and does not pass required number of
strength checks (1 of 3).
Current 3.2 has the
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Ryan Steele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey list,
Recently I've gotten my Samba PDC to successfully use an OpenLDAP
backend, while using the smbk5pwd and ppolicy overlays for OpenLDAP.
However, Samba appears to incorrectly handle responses from LDAP's
ppolicy
15 matches
Mail list logo
