I concur with Felix. I am very happy and impressed with samba4 so far. We
have been using it on two servers that are only acting as AD domain
controllers. We have a separate samba 3.6.8 server. I prefer to keep the file
server still using the existing samba 3.6.X series and use winbind to
On 10/16/2012 03:27 PM, fe...@epepm.cupet.cu wrote:
Recently I migrated to samba4 in my company.
So far so good.
debian 6
samba4.1.0pre1
bind9.9.1-P1 (working pretty well. it even updates the reverse zone and no
problems at all with the forwarder)
ntp-4.2.6p5
All services authenticating with
On 10/16/2012 03:27 PM, fe...@epepm.cupet.cu wrote:
Recently I migrated to samba4 in my company.
So far so good.
debian 6
samba4.1.0pre1
bind9.9.1-P1 (working pretty well. it even updates the reverse zone and no
problems at all with the forwarder)
ntp-4.2.6p5
All services authenticating
On 22/08/12 19:35, fe...@epepm.cupet.cu wrote:
I've just installed samba4 beta 7 with defaults and everything went OK.
As I download bind9.9.1 tarball and compiled it I had to follow steve's
advice:
to declare we'll be using DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2 in
On 22/08/12 20:00, steve wrote:
On 22/08/12 19:35, fe...@epepm.cupet.cu wrote:
I've just installed samba4 beta 7 with defaults and everything went OK.
As I download bind9.9.1 tarball and compiled it I had to follow steve's
advice:
to declare we'll be using DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2 in
On 22/08/12 20:00, steve wrote:
On 22/08/12 19:35, fe...@epepm.cupet.cu wrote:
I've just installed samba4 beta 7 with defaults and everything went
OK.
As I download bind9.9.1 tarball and compiled it I had to follow
steve's
advice:
to declare we'll be using DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2 in
