On 14.5.2013 19:49, Pekka L.J. Jalkanen wrote:
On 14.5.2013 19:31, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 11:04 +0300, Pekka L.J. Jalkanen wrote:
On 14.5.2013 8:04, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
The issue is the same
for all of these accounts. We simply have a password encoded in a
format
On 14.5.2013 8:04, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 14:24 +0300, Pekka L.J. Jalkanen wrote:
Any ideas how to resolve this problem?
No comments, it seems.
I can see that even if this is a bug in Samba it would be really hard to
reproduce. But it's really frustrating too,
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 11:04 +0300, Pekka L.J. Jalkanen wrote:
On 14.5.2013 8:04, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 14:24 +0300, Pekka L.J. Jalkanen wrote:
Any ideas how to resolve this problem?
No comments, it seems.
I can see that even if this is a bug in Samba it would
On 14.5.2013 19:31, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 11:04 +0300, Pekka L.J. Jalkanen wrote:
On 14.5.2013 8:04, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
The issue is the same
for all of these accounts. We simply have a password encoded in a
format that we do not correctly parse. The 00 20 stuff
On 10.5.2013 16:32, Pekka L.J. Jalkanen wrote:
On 10.5.2013 14:04, Pekka L.J. Jalkanen wrote:
Question: how much more verbosity for log.samba would be needed to
further investigate this problem? I'd rather not log everything with
-d10 for extended periods of time, because I really can't know
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 14:24 +0300, Pekka L.J. Jalkanen wrote:
Any ideas how to resolve this problem?
No comments, it seems.
I can see that even if this is a bug in Samba it would be really hard to
reproduce. But it's really frustrating too, because if the
authentication isn't reliable I
On 10.5.2013 14:04, Pekka L.J. Jalkanen wrote:
Question: how much more verbosity for log.samba would be needed to
further investigate this problem? I'd rather not log everything with
-d10 for extended periods of time, because I really can't know how
long it will take for the problem to
