On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 03:31:37PM -0400, Alex wrote:
I hope everyone's enjoying the nice weather.
I am called the system admin here, but really I just fell into the
job over the past 25 years.
Is there a way to search the archives?
My problem is that I've suddenly got 6 WinXP desktops
Alex said the following on 06/17/2011 03:31 PM:
No WinXP updates had been installed that I know of and none on Linux,
either.
Ok. I spoke too soon. I just found out that on Thursday morning at 3am
my WinXP desktops downloaded and installed Software Distribution
Service 3.0 from
Have a look at:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Implementing_System_Policies_with_Samba
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 6:46 PM, hemanth kumar hemant...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Takahasi,
Tks for spending your valuable time for replying,
We dont have any NT DC here.Samba is going to be the first DC.So
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:43 AM, hemanth kumar hemant...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We are setting up a samba PDC with rhcl 5.I made some restrictions in XP
box using GPEDIT like restricting the access to control panel,desktop
properties, registry and etc. ,then i copied the DEFAULT USER folder
2010/12/10 hemanth kumar hemant...@gmail.com:
We are setting up a samba PDC with rhcl 5.I made some restrictions in XP
box using GPEDIT like restricting the access to control panel,desktop
properties, registry and etc.
(snip)
how can we setup the profile for xp users
Samba domain is
Hi Takahasi,
Tks for spending your valuable time for replying,
We dont have any NT DC here.Samba is going to be the first DC.So is there
any way do creat policies without NT?
tks
Hemanth Kumar M
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:25 PM, TAKAHASHI Motonobu mo...@monyo.com wrote:
2010/12/10 hemanth
Il 29/10/2010 09:37, Jochen Hebbrecht ha scritto:
Following issue only occurs on a Windows XP system (it doesn't happen on
Windows 7)
I have Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick) server with samba 3.5.4. The server has a
samba share and another PC (which has Windows XP as operating system) is
connected to
OK - fixed that one. The problem was a too long netbios name. Adding the
following line to the smb.conf fixed the problem:
netbios name = dc
Seems Windows only sends the machine name within its logon request if
the netbios name of the domain controller does not exceed a specific
length (16
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Norberto Bensa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:59 PM, John Drescherdresche...@gmail.com wrote:
This desktop.ini file is a hidden file that windows places in all
folders of your system to store the preferences of your explorer view.
The problem
In a Windows environment, the visibility of that file is dependent upon the
client view option Hide protected operating system files (Recommended), which
controls view of files with the system flag set. This is set on a per user
basis.
Hope this helps!
On 6/30/09 8:22 AM, John Drescher
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:17 PM, David
Christensendavid.christen...@viveli.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Norberto Bensa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:59 PM, John Drescherdresche...@gmail.com wrote:
This desktop.ini file is a hidden file that windows places in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Regis Niggemann wrote:
In a Windows environment, the visibility of that file is dependent upon the
client view option Hide protected operating system files (Recommended),
which controls view of files with the system flag set. This is set on a
To me, that means that the Windows default profile has this set in it. Once it
is set on a user's profile, it will need to be reset for each user. It's not
uncommon for a system administrator to configure the an account the way they
want it, then copy that users' profile to the Default
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:26 PM, David
Christensendavid.christen...@viveli.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When WinXP users login to the samba domain a text file opens that contains:
[.ShellClassInfo]
localizedresourcena...@%systemroot%\system32\shell32.dll,-21787
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:59 PM, John Drescherdresche...@gmail.com wrote:
This desktop.ini file is a hidden file that windows places in all
folders of your system to store the preferences of your explorer view.
The problem here is samba is making this hidden file in the startup
folder of the
Hi,
Im running debian etch with samba 3.0.26a
and about 15 XP SP3 pc's and 60 XP SP2 pc's
ldap backend and this setup is running for 4 years now
no problems here...
Louis
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: samba-bounces+belle=bazuin...@lists.samba.org
Try to replace the last three lines (map archive/system/hidden) with a
single line like this:
store dos attributes = Yes
This will ensure, that file attributes get correctly set by using extended
attributes (see the smb.conf manual for more details). I think, it's a lot
better way for storing
I had the same behaviour of disapearing files. I was able to trace the
problem to the parameter map hidden = yes. The advice given to you by
kissg seems correct to me.
Also, remove the parameter socket options. It is no longer necessary
with modern kernels and can actually degrade
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This might be the cause:
http://www.tweakxp.com/Article37934.aspx
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/320138
Dear All,
Sorry to bothering you. I am beginner to samba. Please help me
regarding the below problem.
while I am testing my NAS disk standby(sleep)
Thanks for the info Rune, but my problem is slightly different. My
trouble is not that users cannot write over a folder, actually the can
operaty normally over them; the trouble is that on Windows XP and 2003
clients, windows shows folders inside the shares as read-only (when you
go over the
On Jan 14, 2008 5:32 AM, Héctor Sánchez Sanmartín [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the info Rune, but my problem is slightly different. My
trouble is not that users cannot write over a folder, actually the can
operaty normally over them; the trouble is that on Windows XP and 2003
clients,
On Jan 14, 2008 10:15 AM, Héctor Sánchez Sanmartín [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Drescher escribió:
I have seen this from time to time at work but since this is harmless
I pretty much ignore it. Now when the user files are actually read
only and they are not supposed to be so is when my
John Drescher escribió:
I have seen this from time to time at work but since this is harmless
I pretty much ignore it. Now when the user files are actually read
only and they are not supposed to be so is when my users will contact
me...
Well, I also used to thought that it's harmless but the
John Drescher escribió:
Are you 100% sure the unix permissions on that folder were correct?
Sure. We tried to save to that folder from Photoshop and it didn't allow
me to do so. Then I saved it to the local disk and then copy the file to
the folder through the windows explorer thing...and
Hector Sanchez wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Do the win2k clients show the same behaviour?
No they don't... I forgot to mentioned it. Any clue??
Thanks for the reply
Windows clients have always been flaky for me.
Do you log in to Windows networking on the WinXP machines?
--
To
Sorry, I forgot to mentioned that this behaviour happens only on windows
xp clientes...win2k ones work perfectly. Just in case it can help.
Any clue?
Thanks in advance.
Héctor Sánchez Sanmartín escribió:
Dear all,
I've got a linux server running samba-3.0.10 with some windows xp and
On Friday 11 January 2008, Héctor Sánchez Sanmartín wrote:
nt acl support = No
Have you tried it with the default nt acl support = yes?
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Friday 11 January 2008, Chris Smith wrote:
instead
of writable or writable.
SHould be writeable or writable.
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
James Lockie escribió:
Hector Sanchez wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Do the win2k clients show the same behaviour?
No they don't... I forgot to mentioned it. Any clue??
Thanks for the reply
Windows clients have always been flaky for me.
Do you log in to Windows networking on the
Rune Tønnesen escribió:
May I suggest this
[publica]
path = /sis/publica/
public = yes
# only guest = yes
writable = yes
force user = sis
force group = sis
This should solve your problem as samba by default set a share as read only and
Chris Smith escribió:
On Friday 11 January 2008, Héctor Sánchez Sanmartín wrote:
nt acl support = No
Have you tried it with the default nt acl support = yes?
yes, and still the same :(
--
Héctor Sánchez Sanmartín
PlanaTec Software S.L. ** Castellón (Spain)
tlf: +34 964340560 **
Dear all,
I've got a linux server running samba-3.0.10 with some windows xp and
windows 2k clients. My config is something like:
[global]
server string = aroprod
workgroup = WORKGROUP
hosts allow = 192.168.0. 127.
security = share
load printers =
On Friday 11 January 2008, Rune Tønnesen wrote:
[publica]
path = /sis/publica/
public = yes
# only guest = yes
writable = yes
force user = sis
force group = sis
This should solve your problem as samba by default set a share as
Chris Smith skrev:
On Friday 11 January 2008, Chris Smith wrote:
instead
of writable or writable.
SHould be writeable or writable.
Sorry I was wrong about that.
Back to the problem
from
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/AccessControls.html
try this
I login from my workstations running Win XP, I then click on the Start
Button (bottom Left). The very top of the popup window displays the
fullname of the user (i.e. first, initial and lastname).
After some time, the fullname gets replaced my the userid.
Also happens with an NT 4.0 domain
Hello,
can you please try the latest smbldap-tools-0.9.4
(http://download.gna.org/smbldap-tools/packages/). The displayname
attribute was updated for this. Let me know if it help you.
--
Jerome
On 9/24/07, Renato Loffreda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running smbldap-tools-0.9.1-1 and
Hi,
This was great. Here is a shorter way of doing it:
1. Change your computers base to the same as your users base in the
smbldap.conf (IDEALX scrpits config) and smb.conf (samba config)
2. Using phpldapadmin copy your existing computer accounts to the same base
as your user accounts
3. Restart
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:37:24AM +0200, Alexander Geraldy wrote:
Hello!
We probably have a Samba related Windows XP problem:
When I start the cmd.exe shell, enter a samba share and call dir I can
see (for example):
a.java, b.java and c.JAVA
But if I call dir *.java, only c.JAVA is
Gary Dale wrote:
The Administrator account you are trying to log in with could be
either a local administrator or a domain administrator. If the former,
then you would have to log in locally. If the latter, and this would
also be the case for badcat, you would have to give the domain user
that fixed it, but I dont know why - what's access control lists have to
do with the problem I was seeing?
thnx,
reza
Gary Dale wrote:
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Sunday 14 January 2007 07:24, Gary Dale wrote:
Try adding set acls = yes to smb.conf and restarting Samba.
Are you sure
On Sunday 14 January 2007 18:39, Reza Naima wrote:
that fixed it, but I dont know why - what's access control lists have to
do with the problem I was seeing?
Read the manual entry for profile acls - it explains it I believe (basically,
some versions of windows are more fussy about the profile
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Sunday 14 January 2007 07:24, Gary Dale wrote:
Try adding set acls = yes to smb.conf and restarting Samba.
Are you sure this is correct? I can't find that option in the man page.
There is, however, a profile acls option.
(In v 3.0.23 anyway)
You're
Jiri Vyskocil wrote:
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Sunday 14 January 2007 07:24, Gary Dale wrote:
Try adding set acls = yes to smb.conf and restarting Samba.
Are you sure this is correct? I can't find that option in the man page.
There is, however, a profile
Jiri Vyskocil wrote:
Greetings to the samba community,
I am trying to set up a small (12 workstations) Windows XP network served by an
Ubuntu 6.06 samba PDC.
I have domain logons working, but I am unable to properly set up roaming profiles. One of the users called host
(which means guest in
Try adding set acls = yes to smb.conf and restarting Samba.
Still no difference :-(
I also noticed, that the WIndows logs obtained using the method described
in MS KB contain a lot of strange outdated info and almost no actual
events, so if anyone knows about a sensible way of xp workstation
On Sunday 14 January 2007 07:24, Gary Dale wrote:
Try adding set acls = yes to smb.conf and restarting Samba.
Are you sure this is correct? I can't find that option in the man page. There
is, however, a profile acls option.
(In v 3.0.23 anyway)
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network
do a 'View-Refresh' from the menu in windows. What could I have
misconfigured?
Nothing. This is the default behavior.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Sunday 14 January 2007 07:24, Gary Dale wrote:
Try adding set acls = yes to smb.conf and restarting Samba.
Are you sure this is correct? I can't find that option in the man page. There
is, however, a profile acls option.
(In v 3.0.23 anyway)
You're
On Saturday 13 January 2007 19:40, Reza Naima wrote:
whenever I update a file via windows (i.e. delete/rename a file,
create a directory), it doesn't show anything has changed till I manully
do a 'View-Refresh' from the menu in windows. What could I have
misconfigured?
Refresh shouldn't be
Updating to a Samba 3 will provide better support for XP clients.
That said, I used 2.2.7 for XP clients for about a year. All that was
required was setting to 0 (zero) the Windows XP registry key:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Service\Netlogon\Parameters\requiresignorseal
Then
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:08:11PM -0800, Do, Frank C wrote:
If someone have the answer for the question whether the Samba 2.0.5a
support window XP client?
I don't think anybody will give you a definitive answer on
this one, you will just have to try. You will most
definitely not get all the
Hello Frank,
Do, Frank C schrieb:
I am looking for the answer for the same subject. Currently I have Linux
2.0.36 running on my linux box.
I would like to install Samba server on the box. I am expecting the
Windows XP client will access to the box for file transfer.
i assume you _have_
I get the same behavior on Ubuntu 6.06 with Samba 3.0.22 so it isn't
just you. I notice that when an XP client first connects, the share
behaves as it should with file and folder deletions showing up
immediately. If left sitting with a share open for a few minutes, the
behavior starts. You can
Honestly, I haven't had anyone complain about this. In fact, I haven't
had anyone mention it at all. But I've known about the behavior for a
while now.
As a user I don't mind this at all. I have no problem hitting the F5 key on
my keyboard if I have an explorer window open for an extended
In theory, the server should notify the client that a change has
occurred on the folder being viewed and then the client refreshes as
opposed to a constant refresh going on. If you look in the smb.conf
documentation, the change notify setting defaults to every 60 seconds.
You could move it out
On 11/30/06, Aaron Kincer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In theory, the server should notify the client that a change has
occurred on the folder being viewed and then the client refreshes as
opposed to a constant refresh going on. If you look in the smb.conf
documentation, the change notify setting
I'm of the opinion that this could have bigger consequences than you
might guess. I would suggest it better to inform people about the
behavior and let them hit F5 when they feel the need.
I know this is a bit off topic, but I believe calling it a bug in
Samba is a bit disingenuous. If my
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 21:50, David Schulz wrote:
dont you think the issue is in xp
itself? when connecting with a macosx machine to the samba share, i
do not get this problem.
On the surface it appears to be an XP--Samba issue. The Mac, of course, runs
Samba. I cannot recreate the
Like I said, Microsoft fixed an identical sounding problem in support
article 823291. This fix was added to XP SP2. Hint: This code change
wasn't added to Windows 2000.
So based on the evidence at hand, the problem seems to have been caused
by Microsoft.
Chris Smith wrote:
On Wednesday 29
On 11/30/06, John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/30/06, Aaron Kincer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm of the opinion that this could have bigger consequences than you
might guess. I would suggest it better to inform people about the
behavior and let them hit F5 when they feel the need.
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 02:50:53PM +0800, David Schulz wrote:
i installed Samba 3 on a FreeBSD 6.1 Machine. Windows XP Users are
connecting to it. The Problem is that when the XP Users are creating
or deleting a File or Folder on the Samba Share, the thing doesn't
appear (or disappear)
Hi,
sorry, i do not have this Problem on another Server using the same OS
and Windows XP as Clients. I cant believe that this is acceptable to
Users, there must be a way to improve this. :(
David
On Nov 29, 2006, at 4:14 PM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 02:50:53PM
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 08:35:49PM +0800, David Schulz wrote:
sorry, i do not have this Problem on another Server using the same OS
and Windows XP as Clients. I cant believe that this is acceptable to
Users, there must be a way to improve this. :(
Does running with FAM help?
Volker
i tried now to install fam, dont really know how it works. got it
started though, but to no avail. dont you think the issue is in xp
itself? when connecting with a macosx machine to the samba share, i
do not get this problem.
thanks
david
On Nov 29, 2006, at 8:42 PM, Volker Lendecke
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:50:43AM +0800, David Schulz wrote:
i tried now to install fam, dont really know how it works. got it
started though, but to no avail. dont you think the issue is in xp
itself? when connecting with a macosx machine to the samba share, i
do not get this problem.
Am Dienstag, 28. November 2006 19:29 schrieb Arlequín:
Hello, there
I want to connect to a Windows XP share using the following line in my
fstab
\\WINDOWS-PC\SHARE /dir/to/mount/share smbfs
auto,umask=0002,credentials=/etc/winpassword,iocharset=utf8,gid=0,noauto 0
0
It mounts OK but I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/12/2006 09:05 AM, Per Qvindesland escreveu:
Hello List,
I have a odd problem and I should perhaps ask this on msn or something
like that :) but I am running a ldc with ldap, everything works like a
charm but on one of the machine a newly
Roger Lucas wrote:
I navigate through Windows Explorer to My Network Places and so on until
I get to the server. I open up a folder on the server. I execute the
'ps auxwww | grep mbd' and sure enough, there's the share. The
smbstatus command confirms this. Now, I close out that Windows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan,
A good suggestion, but unfortunately the smbd
daemon still continues to run on the server end. However,
I've run across the problem of no longer being able
to duplicate the problem consistently. I'm not sure
what exactly causes some
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan,
A good suggestion, but unfortunately the smbd
daemon still continues to run on the server end. However,
I've run across the problem of no longer being able
to duplicate the problem consistently. I'm not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Steele wrote:
I'm not sure. The production environment still experiences
this issue, it's just that I have trouble duplicating
it in a test environment. However, the traffic in that
production environment is significantly heavier so it
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Jeremy Allison wrote:
are using it successfully (and I'm not saying that lightly). If the process
seems stuck try attaching to it with gdb or strace and find out what
it's doing. Don't use kill -9, that can damage internal Samba databases.
It seems to me that, in most
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 04:27:18PM -0500, Logan Shaw wrote:
It seems to me that, in most cases (there are exceptions),
doing a kill -9 isn't any more harmful than the machine
crashing or power being lost. How resistant is smbd to the
machine losing power? Would the same risk exist?
They are
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 04:27:18PM -0500, Logan Shaw wrote:
It seems to me that, in most cases (there are exceptions),
doing a kill -9 isn't any more harmful than the machine
crashing or power being lost. How resistant is smbd to the
machine losing power? Would the
Ryan Steele wrote:
All,
I desperately need a resolution to this issue. I've asked once (about a
day or two ago), but I haven't heard anything back. The only reason I
press the issue is I may because without a quick resolution, I may be
forced to switch over to AD (cry!). I submitted a
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:37:05AM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
I desperately need a resolution to this issue. I've asked once (about a
day or two ago), but I haven't heard anything back. The only reason I
press the issue is I may because without a quick resolution, I may be
forced to
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:37:05AM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
I desperately need a resolution to this issue. I've asked once (about a
day or two ago), but I haven't heard anything back. The only reason I
press the issue is I may because without a quick resolution, I
I navigate through Windows Explorer to My Network Places and so on until
I get to the server. I open up a folder on the server. I execute the
'ps auxwww | grep mbd' and sure enough, there's the share. The
smbstatus command confirms this. Now, I close out that Windows Explorer
window
On Sunday 12 March 2006 02:06, Thomas Limoncelli wrote:
Sounds as if Path MTU discovery is not working for you, so large packets
don't pass your VPN. You might want to have a look with Ethereal and
check your VPN configuration and packet filters.
Indeed that was the problem. This does not fix
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a problem with browsing and share access over an IPSEC VPN. Details
follow.
[...]
2) Accessing file shares on CAESAR (by typing \\CAESAR in the location bar)
only works with very small directories and files.
Sounds as if Path MTU discovery is not working for
I had similar issues and it was due to SELinux running on my Redhat box.
I haven't fine tuned SELinux yet but disabling it altogether made it
work for now.
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 21:24 -0500, Louis E Garcia II wrote:
I am trying to connect to a samba share from winxp home and the username
is
This is not a samba of linux issue. It's a win XP thing.
-Louis
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 20:54 -0600, Chris Lamb wrote:
I had similar issues and it was due to SELinux running on my Redhat box.
I haven't fine tuned SELinux yet but disabling it altogether made it
work for now.
On Mon,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 11:36:42AM +0100, Micha Kersloot wrote:
Hi,
I've got a Samba 3.0.2a PDC running for some time now (like more than a
year) with MS Windows XP clients. But suddenly on January 23 2006 none
of the clients where able to login anymore. The error on the client was
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 05:45:51PM -0600, Chris Cejka wrote:
X-Mitch IT-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I sent a message earlier in regards to this problem and got one response
which did not fix the problem. Can someone please help in fixing this
Thanks to everyone for your help, I've got some useful suggestions
there to try out. Thanks again! Hopefully, this will be enough to stop
them migrating the server to Windows, at $ENORMOUS_COST.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Richard Gaywood wrote:
A friend of mine has asked me a question in my role as biggest local
geek (for very small values of local). Googling hasn't turned up an
answer, so does anyone here know if this is possible?
At his business, they had a mixture of XP Home, XP Pro and Win98
machines
Obviously, the XP Home machines will not be able to log into the
domain. However, is there any way to allow them access to the public
everyone-read-write anyway, even though they are not in the domain?
Your XP Home machines will function just the same connecting to a pdc as
they do now with a
One way of doing this in XP home is to map the drive. As you know, XP
home is not built for a role as a domain client, but will do workgroups
just fine, with no security. Because your drive that you want to access
from XP home is read/write everyone, you can just map the drive and make
sure you
On 4/24/05, Pertti Rahnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I have a problem connecting my Windows XP Home Edition machine to the Samba
network. The SuSe Linux machine is visible on Windows machine, but when
clicking on an icon, it displays an error message: //Server is not
accessible. You
Hello,
from smb.conf:
logon path = \\ibkfsv-01\profiles/%u
[profiles]
path = /home/nt_profiles
writeable = Yes
create mask = 0600
directory mask = 0700
browseable = No
/home/nt_profiles has 777, /home/nt_profiles/user has 700
and owner user.
chris
Am 21
Jules Agee:
(replying to self again)
Update:
The Windows XP (SP2, BTW) client tries three times to log in to the
Samba server with the Windows username, which is different from the
Samba username. As one would expect, Samba replies to each of the three
requests with a STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
Jules Agee:
(replying to self again)
Update:
The Windows XP (SP2, BTW) client tries three times to log in to the
Samba server with the Windows username, which is different from the
Samba username. As one would expect, Samba replies to each of the three
requests with a
On Monday 28 March 2005 20:07, Jules Agee wrote:
updates]
comment = Software Updates
path = /var/local/fileshare/admin/updates
browsable = no
create mask = 774
group = SystemAdmin
directory mask = 0775
nt acl support = no
(replying to self again)
Update:
The Windows XP (SP2, BTW) client tries three times to log in to the
Samba server with the Windows username, which is different from the
Samba username. As one would expect, Samba replies to each of the three
requests with a STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD message, and in
(replying to self)
I'd appreciate any response at all (including RTFM, but a pointer to
which FM I should R again would be very appreciated).
Again, we're running Samba 3.0.7 on Debian Sarge, and this problem
doesn't appear when we connect to Windows file servers, so I thought
someone here
(replying to self)
Jules Agee wrote:
Hi, we've been using Samba for a while, and are just now starting to
switch our desktop computers to Windows XP. We are having a problem
where connections to our Samba server fail, and the user is presented
with a password prompt asking for a password for
On Sunday 20 March 2005 03:55, Honey Bajaj wrote:
Hi,
I have configured samba domain in our network of around 150 windows node,
we are running 4 Samba server, Samba acts as PDC, member server, everything
was running fine with windows 98, until we start upgrading our systems to
windows xp,
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2005 03:55, Honey Bajaj wrote:
I have configured samba domain in our network of around 150 windows node,
we are running 4 Samba server, Samba acts as PDC, member server, everything
was running fine with windows 98, until we start upgrading our systems to
On Sunday 20 March 2005 19:53, Eric Feldhusen wrote:
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2005 03:55, Honey Bajaj wrote:
I have configured samba domain in our network of around 150 windows node,
we are running 4 Samba server, Samba acts as PDC, member server,
everything was running
Mike Partyka wrote:
s there is trick to fully copying an existing local profile over to your new
domain profile after you join the Samba domain? I tried the profile copy
under System Properties, on the advanced tab and although it completed, I
log on and MS office wants to load files from the CD
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
