*PLEASE SAVE THIS WELCOME MESSAGE! *
Welcome to linux-mag-news!
This list is for the monthly Linux Magazine newsletter.
*PLEASE SAVE THIS WELCOME MESSAGE! *
Welcome to linux-mag-news!
This list is for the monthly Linux Magazine newsletter.
Subject: RE: [Samba] Act! database on a Samba server
From: C. Linus Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Yannick Tousignant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 05 Jun 2002 13:37:04 -0400
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 13:13, Yannick Tousignant wrote:
We are running act! databases on a samba share since the beginning
of
It properly the best to use force group in this case aswell.
[accts]
comment = Accounts Dept Share
path = /usr/local/share/accounts
valid users = @accounts
public = no
writable = yes
printable = no
create mask = 0765
force group = accounts
so when a user drops
Well that would be:
901
139
138
137
I think those are all of them. I am not excately sure if you really need all of
them open
Klaus
On 6 Jun 2002 at 9:52, Paul Blackaller wrote:
Hi
I have samba installed running successfully on a Solaris 8 server.
directory shares were working as
Hello,
I have samba installed on an updated installation of Debian 2.2. Using
kernel 2.4.18 with the ext2 ACL and EA patches. Samba is configured to
support ACLs. Win2k clients can update the ACLs on the server.
I have installed the Windows NT4 Server tools for Windows 95 onto a couple
of
Cates, Brett wrote:
Has anyone tried using Kixtart from a Samba PDC?
http://www.kixtart.org/
Yup - would be lost without it. Brilliant for login scripts for 9x boxes.
Has access to machine name, ip address, username, registry, ini files etc
etc. Not so good for groups on 9x though but there
Did the Linux Distro originally come with 2.4.x? The problem that you
describe sounds like you have an old version of fileutils hanging around on
your box.
Good Luck,
Jason
At 05:33 PM 6/5/2002 -0700, Niranjan Ghate wrote:
Hi,
I am mounting a windows 2000 share on a linux box (2.4.18) using
*PLEASE SAVE THIS WELCOME MESSAGE! *
Welcome to linux-mag-news!
This list is for the monthly Linux Magazine newsletter.
I have two Samba servers configure similarly. One shares fine across our
entire network and the other only works within its own segment. I have
poured over the smb.conf files and cannot see what it preventing the one
from crossing segments. These both are Debian 2.2 boxes and I am just
*PLEASE SAVE THIS WELCOME MESSAGE! *
Welcome to linux-mag-news!
This list is for the monthly Linux Magazine newsletter.
Thanks, for the fast reply. Yes, I can ping the WINS server from the bad
Samba server. Actually, I have two NT WINS servers that have a PUSH / PULL
relationship set up. I have checked the database on the WINS server that is
on the segment that cannot see the shares from the bad server. It has
Hi again,
the problem described below is a powerpoint 97 problem only.
after an upgrade to powerpoint 2000 everything works fine.
I know know that it is no samba problem but this won't help
much because a general upgrade of powerpoint is not possible.
The thousands of windows pc's are
All,
The powers that be are going to buy a win2k server that will have a
Compaq TL891DLX tape library. I have been trying to get one for my samba box
as well. My question is can I back up the samba box to the win2k tape
library? I know that you would have to mount the tape library on the
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Tom Ansley wrote:
Hi all,
I have changed my workstation fstab file to include 3 shares on the server
that I want to mount during boot up. But, I had to include my username and
password inside the fstab file. Does anybody have any other ways of doing
this
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Niranjan Ghate wrote:
Hi,
I am mounting a windows 2000 share on a linux box (2.4.18) using smbmount
(2.2.2). I can create files 2Gb on both the systems, but I can't copy a
file 2Gb from the linux box over the smbmount. The file size limit is
exceeded and the cp
We've encountered a problem with getting a newly installed Samba based
machine to join the domain.
Here's the command line and error response:
[root@chain samba]# smbpasswd -j COLUMBIA -r cmc-bkup -U murphyn
Password:
error creating domain user: NT_STATUS_INVALID_DOMAIN_ROLE
Unable
Did you create the Computer in the Domain first?
Try that (without the -U murphyn).
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: IT Server Group
Subject: [Samba] problem joining the domain
Did you add your linux machine into the WindowsNT PDC?
I belive it's in Server manager into Administration menus.
Yannick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Michael Rasmussen
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:15 AM
To: [EMAIL
Hi,
I have some problem with running testsuites for samba.
I use the dejaGNU 1.4.2 and latest 2.2.4 samba sources.
What's wrong with my settings ?
When I running runtest in testsuites directory I got:
WARNING: Couldn't find the global config file.
WARNING: No tool specified
Test Run By
How does one get rid of machines from the WINS database?
They seem to hang around foreverand a restart doesn't solve it because the WINS
data just gets passed around...
Michael D. Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.csihq.com/
http://www.csihq.com/~mike
321-676-2923, x203
Melbourne FL
--
(Embedded
image moved Kevin Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:15 PM
pic15176.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved Kevin Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:15 PM
pic25467.pcx)
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Nicolas RICHARD wrote:
Hello
First excuse me for my poor english but I'm french! Then my problem... I
use samba 2.2.3a with Red Hat 7.2. I want to share a lan printer. I have
define it with cups and I can print correctly on Linux. I share it on
samba to use it on
(Embedded
image moved Kevin Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:15 PM
pic02593.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved Kevin Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:15 PM
pic29929.pcx)
I've experienced something like this, as well. Though I don't know if this
will help, I would make sure that your NT username(s) are appropriately
mapped to unix users. You may not be able to view the properties because
the permissions/mapped user are mixed up. You can check this by doing a
(Embedded
image moved Klopf, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:44 PM
pic16966.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved Kevin Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:15 PM
pic19628.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved WEBSTER, Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:39 PM
pic04242.pcx)
Michael:
You said Yes, the machine pre-existed in the domain.
This implies that there was a pre-existing machine account that was
in use for the server. Every time you want to add a samba server to a
domain, the MACHINE ACCOUNT HAS TO BE DELETED AND READDED. In other words,
(Embedded
image moved Klopf, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:44 PM
pic17085.pcx)
i've just recompiled and tested - looks good
both swat and testparm seem to work correctly
brad
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 22:48, Billy O'Connor wrote:
The swat/testparm bug is in lp_save_defaults(), a little used
(swat/testparm only) function. An attempted strdup() of a NULL
string is
(Embedded
image moved Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:30 PM
pic07625.pcx)
Greetings ...
After a little research (somebody did a bit or work ;-O ) with google and
the replies to my questions, this what I think I understand and will test
very soon ( Hope not to make an ass of myself. )
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Samba 2.2 supports being trusted by NT. Its a bit
(Embedded
image moved Kevin Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:15 PM
pic00802.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:30 PM
pic09284.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved Klopf, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:44 PM
pic22433.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved Kevin Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:15 PM
pic15436.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved WEBSTER, Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:39 PM
pic16158.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:30 PM
pic08942.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:59 PM
pic18794.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved Klopf, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:44 PM
pic16700.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved Geert Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:55 PM
pic20654.pcx)
I do not remember that I sent you an email yesterday? What you may need
is to add linux server name to the windows lmhosts and hosts and hosts.txt
in the \winnt\system32\drivers\etc directory, you then define a
userid (using the name of the operating system where your samba server is)
on
(Embedded
image moved C.Lee Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:54 PM
pic26037.pcx)
hey - what's up with those embedded images - i didn't send those.
looks like the same thing happened to some other guy a few minutes ago.
something fishy here...
i'm using evolution 1.0.3 for mua
brad
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 13:30, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
(Embedded
image moved Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:30 PM
pic04173.pcx)
I'm not big on replying to myself but I wanted to at least in case somebody
else ever runs into this problem.
After trying to recreate the issue we discovered that there was a link that
someone had placed in the filesystem that went through the WAN to a now
defunct machine. After removing
(Embedded
image moved Klopf, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:44 PM
pic10940.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:59 PM
pic06895.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved Kevin Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:55 PM
pic01812.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved Geert Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:55 PM
pic18844.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved C.Lee Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:54 PM
pic05180.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved Hall, Ken (ECSS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:57 PM
pic16789.pcx)
All these messages seem to have this in common (apologies for formatting --
gots to love Windows clients):
-
Received: from va.samba.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 1C38D4655; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL
(Embedded
image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 02:17 PM
pic30582.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 02:20 PM
pic00216.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved Damian Gerow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 02:44 PM
pic01020.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 02:17 PM
pic28778.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved Geert Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:55 PM
pic04528.pcx)
(Embedded
image moved Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 02:20 PM
pic07488.pcx)
From: Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 06 Jun 2002 14:34:25 -0400
i spoke too soon...
the log level parameter is missing from swat
when i apply your patch...
i saw on technical that alexander mentions
that the problem
Hi all,
I'm using version 2.2.3a (because the patch for printingproblems in
2.2.4 is not working for me) as a PDC for Win9x- and WinXP-Clients. I
want to set up different profile directories for Win9x and WinXP. This
seemed not a problem with
logon home = \\%N\%U\profile_9x_me
logon path =
unscribe
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Title: admin users' file is owned by root
Hi there,
I just found that if an user is assigned in the admin users, and if the user grab a file from window to samba share, the file will be owned by root from unix view. I am believing this is a bug.
The samba version I am using is 2.2.4.
Title: admin users' file is owned by root
Look
into 'force user', 'force group', and 'create mask' in
smb.conf.
GregW
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: June 6, 2002 2:52
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Samba] admin users'
file is
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I just found that if an user is assigned in the admin users, and if
the user grab a file from window to samba share, the file will be owned
by root from unix view. I am believing this is a bug.
The samba version I am using is 2.2.4.
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing that struck me today is the fact that if you copy the
secrets.tdb to another machine, smbd will generate a new SID for the
machine and hand this out on lsaquery. The only way to create a working
BDC with 2.2.5 is to manually generate a
Does smbd support all forms of windows authentication?
Does it support NTLM and NTMLv2 ?
Or does it only support LANMAN?
--Luke
CS Admin
Bozeman,MT 59715
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi,
Can someone please help with my little problem? I am new to samba and have
just set it up on my Linux server. The problem is that I can see my server
name david on my windows 98 network neighbourhood but I cannot asses it. I
have already created some shares but still cannot asses my
This sounds like a password problem, or somthin'.
What is an intel printerserver?
Joel
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 01:18:42PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there
Looking at the archives I didn't find a solution to the following problem
we have here:
Printing from our linux-server
How are you conducting your authentication?
I found that I couldn't net use from my Windows 98 machines but I could
access the shares through network neighborhood.
Also, check your share and global configuration to make sure they are not read
only.
Cheers
Tom
On Thursday 06 June 2002 05:15
NetPort Pro/10, others may vary:
/etc/printcap entry, for LPRng:
LPT 1
:rm=10.0.0.40
:rp=LPT1_PASSTHRU
LPT 2
:rm=10.0.0.40
:rp=LPT2_PASSTHRU
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Joel Hammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:17 PM
To: [EMAIL
From what I understand when I setup a WinXP domain using Samba PDC,
You need to be running 2.2.4 or later of samba.
The reason behind this is that 2.2.4 provides support for Windows XP in a domain
environment.
On Friday 31 May 2002 18:20, Sergio Gusmao wrote:
In fact, I've just got the same
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Florian Hars wrote:
I try to set up Samba 2.2.4 / LDAP as a PDC and it almost works. The
only thing I don't understand is why a domain user can't have a
primaryGroupID of 513 (which looks like it should be a safe default).
But if I set it, login is denied with an error
On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Mike Lee wrote:
I did some frustrating troubleshooting and noticed that the PID
stored in the winbind.pid file is always one less than the actual PID
for winbind. I have restarted winbind many times to verify.
Confirmed. Will fix for 2.2.5. Thanks. Should not be
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 10:06:45PM +0200, Peter Schuller wrote:
What version of Samba. What clients ? What are the symptoms ?
Various versions, including the latest stable release as of this moment.
Win2k on the clients. Symptoms are long delays when opening Word/Excel
documents; along
Title: ±¹¹ÎÄ«µå
¼º¸í
Á÷ÀåÀüÈ
ÈÞ´ëÆù
¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ
Hello ,
Does Samba 2.2 has support for LDAP
I want to use LDAP for user authentication instead of smbpasswd
Any help in this regard would be highly appreciated
Thanks Regards
Kalpit Jain
Vice President-Technology
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Netcore Solutions Pvt Ltd
402, Peninsula
Hi,
Has anyone had the following problem.
Under Win2000 I copy a file from Windows Explorer
to a share running samba 2.2.x. The file does not
yet exist on the share however windows pops up a
warning that the file already exists and it asks me
to replace it. The thing is, the file has a size
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Gerald Carter wrote:
Folks,
We're working very hard towards a 2.2.5 release on Friday.
Just wanted to keep everyone informed. I'll try to freeze the
code Thursday evening to give people time to generate packages.
If I'm good, I'll have the tarball already done and
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Sean Mason wrote:
Hi,
I'm compiling Samba 2.2.3a on Solaris 8. I run ./configure
--with-ldapsam option and the script bombs out with the message
configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config. If I run it
without that option it completes just fine.
I tailed
Hello,
I am using for some years Samba on a Sun Enterprise 450 with 4 processors.
There are only a couple of users for the samba-system an that machine, but
we never faced problems.
Actual version of Samba is 2.2.4 on Solaris 2.6 SPARC.
I do not use:
pam,acl,automount,quotas on that machine.
Hello
First excuse me for my poor english but I'm french!
Then my problem...
I use samba 2.2.3a with Red Hat 7.2.
I want to share a lan printer.
I have define it with cups and I can print correctly on
Linux.
I share it on samba to use it on Windows.
It works on Win95,98 but not with NT,2000
The
Hi,
I'm having Sun Solaris 2.6 installed on SPARC Ultra5. Before
installing samba everything runs smooth. After installing Samba 2.2.4,
when I reboot my machine it doesn't recognise the IP address gives bad
address error. Is there any compatibility issues of Samba 2.2.4 with
Solaris 2.6?
any
Hi Friends,
Iam a new user to Samba. Kindly give me the info / url's where can i get information about samba server
Thanx
Brahmam.Do You Yahoo!?
Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Steven J Mackenzie wrote:
All this has made me brave enough to put my shiny new rpms on to a test
server sharing an HP laser to NT4 clients. I'll report back tomorrow.
Steven,
Thanks for the feedback. Always good to hear when things work :-)
cheers, jerry
How well does Samba 2.2 support byte range locking? I have a report
that there were problems with it in Samba 2.0.7. I wonder if it has
been fixed?
--
Andrew C. Esh mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tricord Systems, Inc.
2905 Northwest Blvd., Suite 20 763-557-9005 (main)
Plymouth, MN
More 2.2.5-pre printing RPC testing:
I've upgraded a 2.2.4-pre server to 2.2.5-pre (Last Sundays CVS).
This print server is a member of a Samba controlled domain, and uses domain
level security.
Printer drivers for an HP2200dn are shared for NT and for 2000 by the
server.
I've tested printing
TAKAHASHI Motonobu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thu Sep 20 00:30:02 2001
Previous message: WINS again ;-)
Next message: WINS static entry support (Re: WINS again ;-))
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sanvir Singh Jham wrote:
I have checked the wins.dat file
The problem I reported would occur with Samba 2.2.4, but not 2.2.2. set_sd() in 2.2.4
returns False if the sd_len passed by the client is 0. This would be okay, except
Novell clients apparently set sd_len=0.
To fix the novell problem, I changed set_sd() to return True, not False if
Am Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2002 01:19 schrieb Jeremy Allison:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 12:12:45AM +0200, Juergen Hasch wrote:
the patch works fine for except for one thing. In the acl security
selection list (showing a list of all available users and groups) the
german umlaut characters are
Test scenerio:
Server: Samba 2_2 CVS as of morning of 6/4/2002. Linux 2.4.18 ext2 file system. AMD
Athlon
processor.
On PC...
net use f: \\server\share
type hi.txt
On Server...
smbstatusshows the file oplocked
cat hi.txthangs until control C hit
On
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:03:05PM +0200, Juergen Hasch wrote:
The conversion in srv_samr_nt.c is needed to show the correct group list in
the ACL-add dialogue. The conversion in lsa_srv_nt.c is needed to set a new
ACL entry in unix codepage after selecting it from the list.
The change in
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing that struck me today is the fact that if you copy the
secrets.tdb to another machine, smbd will generate a new SID for the
machine and hand this out on lsaquery. The only way to create a working
BDC with 2.2.5 is to manually generate a
Volker,
So the bottom line is that if you set the rid attribute to be something
that does not match the algorithm, things break? This little code resuse
would be one problem :-\ Should be a full search based on the rid value.
I'll look into it.
and before bartlt says anythingi realize
From: Tim Potter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:01:45PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Secondly, I have some further style nit-picks:
- We can't use \\ as a comment in Samba, as many C compilers don't
understand it.
It's actually not ANSI C!
Another one I found
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 03:39:59PM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote:
Test scenerio:
Server: Samba 2_2 CVS as of morning of 6/4/2002. Linux 2.4.18 ext2 file system.
AMD Athlon
processor.
On PC...
net use f: \\server\share
type hi.txt
On Server...
smbstatusshows
Lookin' good now. Same test results in correct behavior... that is, when the unix
side attempts
access, the oplock is broken.
Thanks!, Rich Bollinger, Elliott Company
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Richard Bollinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Samba
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
