Hi
I work for an NGO in South Africa and am trying to configure a Samba server,
but I am way out of my depth! Is there anyone who is willing to be very
patient and help me with this?
First question: I have created a user with a password on my Linux server
under User Manager, and then I
Hi
I work for an NGO in South Afric and am trying to configure a Samba
server, but I am way out of my depth! Is there anyone who is willing to
be very patient and help me with this?
First question: I have created a user with a password on my Linux
server under User Manager, and then I have
Hye,
we use a samba 2.2.3a which works fine most time.
now i found that one client has some strange problems.
when the user copies files to the smb-share some of them will be created
with very strange filenames.
For example let's say the original file is named:
my_nicetestfile.txt then on the
Hi!
Pls try: smbpasswd -a [username]
then enter the desired password twice.
Samba keeps it's usernames and passwords in the file
/usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd
Kind regards
Andreas Lindenbauer
mailto:andreas.lindenbauer;salamander.at
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL
The new NT server has a bad HD, so we have a repreive
temporarily and perhaps we can still work this problem
out and still use Samba (:
--- Mathew McKernan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
By the look of it, the reason why it is so slow is
the fact that you may not
be running a WINS Server. We had
On 22 Oct 2002 at 21:26, Jeremy Wohl wrote:
I recently upgraded two client/server pairs to WinXP and Samba 2.2.6
(on Linux).
Browsing mounted shares causes hangs when right-clicking or double-clicking/
launching files -- about 15 seconds. During this, precious little network
activity is
Am Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2002 12:31 schrieb mesiol:
Hye,
we use a samba 2.2.3a which works fine most time.
now i found that one client has some strange problems.
when the user copies files to the smb-share some of them will be created
with very strange filenames.
For example let's say the
We are presenty using SAMBA 2.2 w. Windows 2000 sp1 and will be upgrading
to Windows 2000 sp3.
Are there any known or suspected problems with the combination of Windows
2000 sp3 and SAMBA 2.2.
We are using Solaris 7 on the Unix side.
/ola
Ola Engström
Technical Computing Information Services
Andreas Lindenbauer wrote:
Pls try: smbpasswd -a [username]
Yes - and also include in your smb.conf:
[global]
encrypt passwords = yes
Samba keeps it's usernames and passwords in the file
/usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd
Yes, if you installed from the source distribution.
If
Ls,
My question is probable more a windows 2000 issue, but since my
experience is that linux-related mailinglists result in more usable
information, I give his a try.
I have running a network with win98 and win2000 clients, and a
samba server to deal with user level security.
-Original Message-
From: mesiol [mailto:mesiol;yourwap.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Samba Mailinglist
Subject: [Samba] Strange filenames after copy to smb-share
Hye,
we use a samba 2.2.3a which works fine most time.
now i found that one client has
Chris de Vidal wrote:
Mathew McKernan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the look of it, the reason why it is so slow is
the fact that you may not be running a WINS Server.
While this is a great way to increase speed,
A. It's plenty fast on the NT, Netware, and other
Samba servers. In fact, the
Bart wrote:
My question is probable more a windows 2000 issue, but since my
experience is that linux-related mailinglists result in more usable
information, I give his a try.
That's correct, and maybe you should get a copy of Microsoft's Windows
2000 Resource Kit rather than asking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
smbd[27622]: [2002/10/22 16:04:11, 0] lib/util_str.c:string_sub(1217)
smbd[27622]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 in string_sub(%u, 7)
...
I have compilled it from tar.gz, build it from samba.spec,
It has been my experience that only the owner of the file and root change
change ACLS on that file. Since you've stated that Administrator IS the
owner, maybe there's something else. Are you getting any errors ? Who is
the owner of the diretory that the folder resides in. Is the Administrator
Okay, I've been working with Samba for a few years now, and I've figrued it
out mostly on my own. Now I'm stuck and this problem is slowing down a MAJOR
project in my shop.
Our solid SuSE 7.3 server's network is dying randomly. All services, not
just Samba (2.2.1a) go out. However, it always
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Greetings.
I have samba 2.2.6 installed on FreeBSD 4.7-RC, from ports, compiled
with audit/syslog/recycle/winbind. I try to use audit via syslogd.
I created the following share:
Can you recreate
The setup:
- Samba 2.2.6 with winbind on Solaris 9.
- PDC on NT 4.0 SP6
- fresh install in test lab
Solaris host correctly authenticates users.
wbinfo -u returns all users
wbinfo -g returns all groups
getent passwd returns all users
getent group returns all groups except Domain Users!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Gerhard Vögel wrote:
recently I migrated 3 Netware 4.11 server to one Linux/Samba-box running
on Suse Enterprise Server 7. Everything seemed fine, until performance
problems were detected, especially when starting programs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Chere Zhou wrote:
When I change file property - security from Windows, I can see both from
packet sniffer and Samba code, that there are 4 types of security
information:
Owner ID Reference
Primary Group ID
- Original Message -
From: Konkol, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Bart' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:02 PM
Subject: RE: [Samba] How do I permit NT Administrator to manage ACL's on
samba file server
It has been my experience that only the owner of
Bart,
Check the permissions on the unix/linux file system. Since access is
determined by these permissions. You are probably the owner of the
filesystem and the other user is not in the group that was assigned when it
was created. Check the samba create mask setting in the smb.conf as well.
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 04:54, Chris de Vidal wrote:
You could be right here. The author in the link above
indicated that it might be a problem with small RAID 5
random read/writes. Know how to see I/Os/sec on
Linux, by chance? Bonnie++? I'm still learning about
Linux through experience,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Marcel Mary wrote:
getent group 'Domain Users' hangs forever as does an ls -l on
any new file created by a user belonging to that group.
How many users in the domain?
The smb.conf:
[global]
log level = 3
Set this to 0.
I know winbind (i think) is working fine. i can log into a unix box with my
NT userid but when i try to access shares on my samba server, i get these
errors:
[2002/10/23 08:47:01, 0] lib/util_sec.c:(111)
Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,-2) now set to (0,0) uid=(0,0)
[2002/10/23 08:47:01,
Chris:
First of all let me say that your implementation of Samba is orders of
magnitude above mine, however I have seen some problems similar to yours. I
second the advice about the WINS server. When I have not had this set up
properly (or nmbd has died for some reason) I see all kinds of odd
I am running samba 2.2.6 and cups 1.1.16. I can't get cupsaddsmb to
complete successfully. I'm at an end here, I can't think of anything
else to try after 2 weeks of searching the web. It copies the drivers
to the print$ share directory, however the SetPrinter command fails on
the rpcclient
-Original Message-
From: Bradley W. Langhorst [mailto:brad;langhorst.com]
i use acls - people like them..
i wouldn't think there'd be a particular performace hit with them
though...
I use ACLs. They work fine for me, but then again I've only got about 30
clients.
another thing
You probably should post your smb.conf section that uses the %u variable.
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s/bin/false -M %u
logon script = %u.BAT
greetz
boka
That was uncalled for.
Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
- Original Message -
From: tim smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] How Samba let us down
err
Sorry I forgot to mention that I'm running Samba-alpha3.0.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba-admin;lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of Irving Carrion
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] SAMBA and Win2000
It has been my experience that only the owner of the file and root change
change ACLS on that file. Since you've stated that Administrator IS the
owner, maybe there's something else. Are you getting any errors ? Who is
the owner of the diretory that the folder resides in. Is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Yura Pismerov wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong. With Samba 2.2.5, there is no way to get a
group of users to manage printers so they be able to select/deselect
duplex mode, tray, etc. Although I'm able to add a group with the
When you're connected to the share does it show you connected as root?
Try running smbstatus to find out.
Also, you say that new files are created with the correct permissions, if
you are using force user = root, then all new files should belong to root
NOT domain+administrator.
Do you have nt
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:25:56AM -0700, Jay Ts wrote:
kernel oplocks are for synchronizing SMB clients and
local Unix processes. If you have no processes on linux
accessing the files, then it's probably safe to disable them.
But, if you are using Linux, the only way you should have
kernel
I think everyone else has suggested that you upgrade to 2.2.6. I too
would recommend this. The company where I work had a Win2K box whose
print jobs would get dropped depending on how the printing was setup.
Upgrading fixed the problem. I sent an e-mail about it about a week
ago. If you've
subscribed or not?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Steve Langasek wrote:
Jay Ts wrote:
kernel oplocks are for synchronizing SMB clients and
local Unix processes. If you have no processes on linux
accessing the files, then it's probably safe to disable them.
But, if you are using Linux, the only way you should have
kernel oplocks
Jerry,
Jeremy,
Thanks for your hints on further tracking down
the problem.
I did some tcpdump-ing. Not knowing TCP too well,
I can only conclude the following: It really is
the client that finishes, BUT it only does so
after waiting for quite some time (timeout mechanism
in windows?)
This
Hello all together,
I've got here a very strange problem.
I've set up a vpn with freeswan between two subnets over the internet.
Now I can ping from behind to behind.
With Windows 98 I can search a computer which is in the other subnet and
find the the computer.
But...only the other computer is
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Marcel Mary wrote:
getent group 'Domain Users' hangs forever as does an ls -l on
any new file created by a user belonging to that group.
How many users in the domain?
Indeed...
There
I recently upgraded my Linux distro to SuSE 8.1 which
came w/samba 2.2.5.
A feature of the upgrade was that it 'split' the startup
script for samba from 1 script for _smb_ _nmb_ to 2 scripts.
Now the prologue (used by insserv to create the numbered startup
scripts with dynamic numbering based
Hello,
I am having a lot of difficulty setting up samba (2.2.6-1) on
linux (REDHAT 7.2), and accessing from Win2k.
I have been able to get the share working for smbclient, while
on the LINUX box, but have not been able to get anything
working from a Windows box. I have done the following
after
Just thought it was old enough to be deleted.
The problem was not that hard looking back at it now.
Thanks
Ian
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
I've seen a lot on printing from Win boxes to printers on Linux boxes. I've
found very little on printing from Linux to Windows printers. The HOWTO has
some information and I've found several other sources, but I still can't get
my Linux box to print to a Windows 2000 printer.
I'm using
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:33:20PM +0200, Florian Rauh wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2002 12:31 schrieb mesiol:
Hye,
we use a samba 2.2.3a which works fine most time.
now i found that one client has some strange problems.
when the user copies files to the smb-share some of them will
Hi.
I'm looking for samba 2.2.5 or 2.2.6 binary package to use with squid.
So I need a version compile with option --with-winbind-auth-challenge
and the one provide with red hat 8 doesn't have it. I tried to compile
it but it doesn't work.
Can someone help me?
Thanks in advance,
Hugues
--
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:25:56AM -0700, Jay Ts wrote:
The corruption might be related to oplocks. I'm doing
File corruption is treated as a drop everything - priority
1 bug in Samba. If this were a generic problem known with
2.2.6 we'd be issuing a patch *immediately*.
That's not to say
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le Mercredi 23 Octobre 2002 18:44, Hal Vaughan a écrit :
I've seen a lot on printing from Win boxes to printers on Linux boxes.
I've found very little on printing from Linux to Windows printers. The
HOWTO has some information and I've found
[samba-technical has been removed from addresses because
it's for discussing source code.]
l. a. walsh wrote:
I recently upgraded my Linux distro to SuSE 8.1 which
came w/samba 2.2.5.
A feature of the upgrade was that it 'split' the startup
script for samba from 1 script for _smb_ _nmb_ to
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:49:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jerry,
Jeremy,
Thanks for your hints on further tracking down
the problem.
I did some tcpdump-ing. Not knowing TCP too well,
I can only conclude the following: It really is
the client that finishes, BUT it only does
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 06:00:40PM +0200, Marcel Mary wrote:
Indeed...
There seems to be the problem: about 1000, making the group
lookup result very long (~8KB) and hits a limit somewhere
between Solaris and nss_winbind (shrinking the Domain Users
group to a dozen of users confirmed it).
Jeremy Allison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Jay Ts wrote:
The corruption might be related to oplocks. I'm doing
Just to keep myself out of more trouble today, I'd like
to point out that I didn't write the above. ;-)
File corruption is treated as a drop everything - priority
1 bug in
Jay,
For the record, I thouroughly test samba pre-releases before we ever ship.
To the best of my knowledge, NOT ONE version of samba we have released
ever CAUSED (or resulted in) file/data corruption. If I sound defensive -
that's is exactly correct because file corruption is a DEATH issue!
Title: RE: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down
Here at Tricord, we run Samba through some pretty intense tests, as well. Since we are a file system producer, we focus on corruption bugs. We haven't found any in Samba, other than a rather famous Microsoft Word bug that also occurs on Windows
Hi, I´m an university student of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria ( Canary Islands,
Spain). I apply to you because I´m begining to develop my last project, I´m at
the end of my Computer Engenieer career. What I try in this project is to
extend the PHP language with a library that it conects to a
Have you applied this symlink?
ln -s `which smbspool` /usr/lib/cups/backend/smb
Sylvestre Taburet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Le Mercredi 23 Octobre 2002 18:44, Hal Vaughan a écrit : I've seen a lot on printing from Win boxes to printers on Linux boxes.
Esh, Andrew wrote:
Here at Tricord, we run Samba through some pretty intense tests, as well.
Since we are a file system producer, we focus on corruption bugs. We haven't
found any in Samba,
Since I've been curious about this anyway, I might go ahead and check:
Do you (And J. Terpstra, and
Title: RE: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down
We regularly do large file Copy-Paste tests with files between 30G and 60G. We have yet to see a problem.
Tricord's market is Network Attached Storage, and our product is a file system. Samba is the main interface between our market and our file
Quoting Jay Ts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My experience here is that smbfs isn't perfect, but works pretty
well, and I *really* like it! Without smbfs, I end up having to
run to the Windows system to transfer files. (Sorry, but smbclient
just doesn't do it for me. It works, but is really
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Jay Ts wrote:
Esh, Andrew wrote:
Here at Tricord, we run Samba through some pretty intense tests, as well.
Since we are a file system producer, we focus on corruption bugs. We haven't
found any in Samba,
Since I've been curious about this anyway, I might go ahead
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Jay Ts wrote:
Esh, Andrew wrote:
Here at Tricord, we run Samba through some pretty intense tests, as well.
Since we are a file system producer, we focus on corruption bugs. We haven't
found any in Samba,
Since I've been curious about this anyway, I might go ahead and
I have samba 2.2.2 running on Solaris 2.6 and I am getting the following
errors an awful lot. Anyone can explain this and how to fix it, would be
greatlly appreciated.
[2002/10/23 13:43:01, 0] smbd/connection.c:(63)
yield_connection: tdb_delete for name failed with error Record does not
exist.
file read.
http://igmus.org/files/tcpdump.samba.20021023.txt
Ideas?
thanks,
-jeremy
_
jeremy wohl ..: http://igmus.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:36:26AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
In my opinion, while it is possible to do what you say, that is not how
you will detect corruption. Corruption of the sort you mention will be
detected very quickly in normal tests.
The sort of corruption I think we should
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Jay Ts wrote:
John H Terpstra wrote:
For the record, I thouroughly test samba pre-releases before we ever ship.
To the best of my knowledge, NOT ONE version of samba we have released
ever CAUSED (or resulted in) file/data corruption. If I sound defensive -
that's
Title: Message
Hi,
Does anyone used a linux samba server as
a fileserver for a Win2k, where the w2k is a loaded webserver using IIS? Or maybe a IIS Web Farm?
I need a central storagepoint to my frontend
webservers to centralize all the
administration, backups, etc.
Will the mount consume
John H Terpstra wrote:
Both ways. Remember file/data corruption is a death issue. We do NOT ship
if we see it is broken and we are PARANOID about integrity. Also, remember
that just because it works does not mean it is not broken. Oops, did I say
PARANOID?
[...]
Also remember our unique
As I understand it, concurrent access from SMB clients and NFS clients
(or other UNIX processes) can cause corruption when oplocks is turned on
(unless your UNIX supports kernel oplocks and you use them - only some
Linux and Irix versions support them I believe). Turning off oplocks
might
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:14:41PM -0700, Marc Jacobsen wrote:
This next statement from John Terpstra seems a bit strong to me, see the
counter example below from just a few weeks ago. Not to badmouth John,
or Samba, just to add some more information to the conversation.
What about this
Hello
I would like to know if
you could assist me with stopping the samba services. when I type
/etc/rc.d/init.d/smb restart or stop, it says failed,
Also cannot see network
from server nor can I cannot to Linux system over the
network.
Linda
Craddock
Systems
Administrator
North
Her Yastan Bay ve Bayanlara:
CiNSEL SORUNLARINIZA ARTIK SON BULUYOR!
Alternatif Tip, Bitkisel Tedavi ve Uzakdogu Teknikleri ile...
Cinsel Problemlerinize Kalici ve Kesin Cozumler
Sertlesme ve iktidarsizlik problemi olan erkekler icin:
Sexual Potency Virility-M 149 USD (60 kullanim)
Erken
My first post, for reference:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=sambam=103535378916869w=2
When the new NT server's hard drive died, we decided
to keep hobbling along on Samba. Meanwhile, my
supervisor was searching around on OpLock issues on
Google and he saw other people that were having
similar
Hi,
I keep coming across this problem.
Samba is samba 2.2.5
Go to join a winxp box to the domain and it all appears to work fine. When
you restart you can not login because it wasn't done properly.
Here are my obversations from samba.
A) In the logs there is always this
[2002/10/24
Campared with another samba server configured as PDC (without ldap) on a
much smaller machine, startime of programs executed from shares is 3 to
4 times slower, normal copies are faster.
I think I tried every parameter that could effect performance but had no
success. Increasing debug
- Original Message -
From: Most of you
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down
etc etc
Well this one certainly roused you all.
Must it be the case that you all jump in to reply to this unhelpful
Hii All,
I had been trying to do an smbmount from various machines/architectures/ to win2k/os's
but smbmount on a hardhatlinux built for mpc8xx[myboard] doesnt work for a win2k share
point.
The Error is : ERRDOS ERRnoaccess (Access denied.)
I tried all combinations like:
./smbmount
Title: RE: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down
I tend to focus on absurdities. They lead to interesting results.
-Original Message-
From: Philip Burrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:22 PM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba]
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 11:57, Thomas Angst wrote:
I've got here a very strange problem.
I've set up a vpn with freeswan between two subnets over the internet.
Now I can ping from behind to behind.
With Windows 98 I can search a computer which is in the other subnet and
find the the computer.
Chris de Vidal wrote:
My first post, for reference:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=sambam=103535378916869w=2
When the new NT server's hard drive died, we decided
to keep hobbling along on Samba. Meanwhile, my
supervisor was searching around on OpLock issues on
Google and he saw other
Do you have hosts allow enabled in the smb.conf? Do you have any
firewalling turned on?
hosts allow = 192.168.0.
James Hubbard
Thomas Angst wrote:
Hello all together,
I've got here a very strange problem.
I've set up a vpn with freeswan between two subnets over the internet.
Now I can ping
Philip Burrow wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Most of you
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down
etc etc
Well this one certainly roused you all.
Must it be the case that you all
John H Terpstra wrote:
Jay Ts wrote:
John H Terpstra wrote:
For the record, I thouroughly test samba pre-releases before we ever ship.
To the best of my knowledge, NOT ONE version of samba we have released
ever CAUSED (or resulted in) file/data corruption. If I sound defensive -
1. Disconnect the network cable from the back of your Samba server
2. Remove the Samba server from NT domain
3. Add the Samba server to NT domain (you probably have to wait a few mins)
4. Reconnect the network cable of your Samba server
5. smbpasswd -j Domain -r NT PDC
Norman
- Original
Ok it looks like you have but I'm gonna ask. Have you created the
machine trust accounts? Also have you administered the reghack? (Go to
CP, Administrative Tools, Local Security Settings, Local Policies,
Security Options: Set Domain Member:Digitally Encrypt sign secure
channel data to Disabled
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:14:41PM -0700, Marc Jacobsen wrote:
[ ... ]
Similarly, record locks and share mode locks from SMB clients are both
ignored by NFS clients/other UNIX processes (with the possible exception
of newer Linux systems, they might actually enforce share mode locks).
In
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 11:38:55AM +1000, Matthew Hannigan wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:14:41PM -0700, Marc Jacobsen wrote:
[ ... ]
Similarly, record locks and share mode locks from SMB clients are both
ignored by NFS clients/other UNIX processes (with the possible exception
of
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 09:02:03PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 11:38:55AM +1000, Matthew Hannigan wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:14:41PM -0700, Marc Jacobsen wrote:
[ ... ]
Similarly, record locks and share mode locks from SMB clients are both
ignored by
So how/why would splitting these scripts be a good thing?
It's possible to not run nmbd at all, and in some
circumstances that's what you would want.
Matt
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi guys, I am currently running samba 2.2.5. My mandrake actually came
with Samba. Not sure which version it was. I didn't think I would need
it so I uninstalled it long time ago using the rpm -e option. So after a
while I changed my mind and downloaded the tar.gz version of samba
2.2.5. I am
Title: MSN Home
Elliot wrote:
Hi guys, I am currently running samba 2.2.5. My mandrake actually came
with Samba. Not sure which version it was. I didn't think I would need
it so I uninstalled it long time ago using the rpm -e option. So after a
while I changed my mind and downloaded the tar.gz version of
I had a similiar problem like that. What I did was enable the guest account on the
windows machine and made the printer shared by everyone.
Hal Vaughan wrote:
I've seen a lot on printing from Win boxes to printers on Linux boxes. I've
found very little on printing from Linux to Windows
Hi,
When I do a rpm -qa | grep samba I get the 2 results. Stated below.I get
the feeling that perhaps I did not uninstall properly or something? ...
Please help
-Original Message-
From: Jay Ts [mailto:jay;jayts.cx]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Elliot
Cc: Samba Mailing
err are you asking for help, or just wasting our time?
sounds like you have a big job ahead of you tonight setting up that NT
machine better get that out of the way before telling us your life story
like that
- Original Message -
From: Chris de Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
--- Chris de Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- tim smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
err are you asking for help, or just wasting our
time?
Read the first paragraph of my email, please.
It said:
Before you read this, I want to state (for reasons
listed below) that I don't expect an answer
--- Bartlomiej Solarz-Niesluchowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:13 2002-10-23, you wrote:
The printers were missing some of the records sent
to
them to print, something that had never happened
with
Netware. Every time the missing records were
different. Occasionally, it would work
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 06:10:48AM +0200, Walter Mautner wrote:
## Please don't send HTML next time, it's impossible to quote ##
My mailer decides to use the textpart ;-), but you are right.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba-admin;lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of
Check if the address that the IP address of your server isn't hardcoded in
your smb.conf.
And check if that IP address is the same IP address as one of your server IP
addresses.
Bart
--
Aia Software B.V. Phone
well i did a search and what i came out was with
[root@link lib]# ls -la
libread*-rw-r--r-- 1 root
root 231998 Aug 7 2001
libreadline.alrwxrwxrwx 1 root
root 18 May 3
08:03 libreadline.so - libreadline.so.4.2lrwxrwxrwx 1
root
root 18 May 3
07:43 libreadline.so.4 -
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
