[Samba] Samba 3.0.2 and LDAP
I am getting the following problem when I try to add new machines to the LDAP server. snip [2004/06/07 13:49:12, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_sam_from_ldap(462) init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: administrator [2004/06/07 13:49:13, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_group_from_ldap(1697) init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 512 [2004/06/07 13:49:13, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_group_from_ldap(1697) init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 513 [2004/06/07 13:49:13, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(305) check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [administrator] - [administrator] - [administrator] succeeded [2004/06/07 13:49:14, 2] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_lookup_domain(2461) Returning domain sid for domain MYDOM - S-1-5-21-2872XX-X-XX [2004/06/07 13:49:14, 2] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:access_check_samr_object(93) _samr_open_domain: ACCESS DENIED (requested: 0x0211) [2004/06/07 13:49:14, 2] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_lookup_domain(2461) Returning domain sid for domain MYDOM - S-1-5-21-2872XX-X-XX [2004/06/07 13:49:14, 2] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:access_check_samr_function(115) _samr_create_user: ACCESS DENIED (granted: 0x0201; required: 0x0010) [2004/06/07 13:49:19, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(591) setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources. [2004/06/07 13:49:19, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(591) setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources. [2004/06/07 13:49:19, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_sam_from_ldap(462) init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: administrator [2004/06/07 13:49:20, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(305) check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [administrator] - [administrator] - [administrator] succeeded /snip I am very confused on how to proceed. net groupmap reveals that Domain Admins is mapped to the domadm Ldap Group. [gid=512]. Administrators primary group is 512, and that seems to be fine. We tried several people, all w/ the same results. Why am I getting ACCESS DENIED on the _samr_open_domain_ ? I don't understand that. Also, the create user fails. This seems to ignore my add machine script entirely. Did I miss anything in samba setup? I have searched and searched the archives with the only possible explanation found being that my ldap admin had insufficient rights, or my user had insufficient rights.Please help. AFAIK this worked prior to the last updates. I am using Fedora Core 1, with Samba-3.0.2-6.3 (Actually, now I am not sure about the 6.3). There is an update available, and I am planning on trying that. However I am very beleaguered by this problem. smb.conf: [global] debug level = 2 workgroup = MYDOM server string = SVR1 netbios name = SVR1 add machine script = /usr/sbin/ldapaddmachine.save %m printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 50 security = user encrypt passwords = yes ldap suffix = o=Myou,c=US ldap user suffix= ou=Users ldap group suffix = ou=Groups ;; Work-around re: number failures, and numerous online notes. ;; Which is this supposed to be? ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers ;;ldap machine suffix = ou=Users ldap delete dn = no ldap filter = ((uid=%u)(objectclass=sambaSamAccount)) ldap admin dn = cn=Manager,o=Myou,c=US ldap ssl= off ldap passwd sync= yes passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost idmap backend = ldap:ldap://localhost ;; OS-Level incremented from 33 on 2004-06-4 by IMR. os level = 65 local master = yes domain master = yes domain logons = yes logon script = logon.bat logon path= \\%L\Profiles\%U preserve case = yes short preserve case = yes default case = lower case sensitive = no dns proxy = no socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 wins server = 192.168.10.240 shares removed signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Keep existing domain afterinstalling a new server?
Hi, I have still a RedHat 8.0 server with samba-2.2.7-5.8.0 as PDC. We have about 60 users and workstations. Now I have to install a new server with RedHat ES 3 and samba3. How can I port the domain to the new server, so that I don't have to add every user and workstation again? And we also have roaming profiles, which I have to keep. Thanks! Nicole -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Excluded profile folders sync'd on logout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I do want the Desktop folder on the server. I want Windows to use it instead of copying the Desktop folder in the roaming profile back and forth between the server and client to save time. I have some people on our network that have very large image files and what-not on their Desktop, so logging out tends to take a VERY long time. I thought using folder redirection was the answer to this, but with this syncing on logout it's pretty much just the same thing except with a status bar. What exactly is Windows syncing? It takes so long it seems like it's copying the files, but the files are already on the server and aren't on the Desktop. So how can I stop the syncing that's going on? We just went through the pain of finding this out yesterday. As it was explained to me (I'm not directly handling this), when you first copy the folder to the server, XP sets the flag to treat it as 'offlinable' (or something like that), meaning that it will copy any files down to the local machine and sync them on logout. According to info from the MS website, turning off the offline files option in the properties of the hard disk (root) should stop it - or failing that, turn it off on the folder. Simon -- Simon Hobson, Technology Specialist Colony Gift Corporation Limited Lindal in Furness, Ulverston, Cumbria, LA12 0LD Tel 01229 461100, Fax 01229 461101 Registered in England No. 1499611 Regd. Office : 100 New Bridge Street, London, EC4V 6JA. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Request patch for samba 2.2.2
Dear Sir/Madam, I'm request patch for samba 2.2.2 on Sun Server (Solaris) If you require futher information, Please let me know. Regards. Udomchai S. === PKGINST: samba NAME: SMB based file/printer sharing CATEGORY: system ARCH: sparc VERSION: 2.2.2 BASEDIR: /usr/local VENDOR: Samba Team DESC: File and printer sharing for Windows workstations PSTAMP: nose20011019112615 INSTDATE: Nov 21 2001 06:03 HOTLINE: Please contact your local UNIX support group EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] STATUS: completely installed FILES:432 installed pathnames 9 shared pathnames 26 directories 40 executables 42471 blocks used (approx) --- Please be informed that we have changed our email address to @g-able.com Best Regards. ¡ÃسÒá¡éä¢ÍÕàÁÅì 㹡ÒõԴµè͡ѺàÃÒ à»ç¹ @g-able.com ´éǤÃѺ ¢ÍáÊ´§¤ÇÒÁ¹Ñº¶×Í --- Copyright @ 2004 G-ABLE Co.,Ltd. Powered by Software Solution Dept. First Logic Co.,Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba and W2K domain
Hello, I've set up a samba serve rand it's member of a W2K domain. The problem I've got now is how to modify my smb.conf so domain accounts can access folder on samba ? I created a folder and set up permission : chown 'domain\account:domain\group' folder I'm not sure what to put in my smb.conf now, tks for the help -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba-3.0.4 compile issues on AIX 4.3.3
Hi! I just downloaded samba-3.0.4 and tried to compile it on AIX 4.3.3 with gcc 2.95.2 using LDFLAGS=-Wl,-bbigtoc ./configure --prefix=/bag/samba \ --mandir=/bag/samba/man \ --localstatedir=/usr/local/samba/var \ --with-configdir=/usr/local/samba \ --with-privatedir=/usr/local/samba/private \ --with-lockdir=/usr/local/samba/var/locks \ --with-piddir=/usr/local/samba/var/locks \ --with-ssl --disable-swat \ --with-sslinc=/bag/openssl/include --with-ssllib=/bag/openssl This used to work well in the past, the last time with samba-3.0.2a. Now, running make in the 3.0.4 tree first gives some problems with aud_rec in nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c, however, this could be fixed with an #include sys/audit.h. But when I run make then, I get the following error that I couldn't fix: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/scratch/samba-3.0.4/source$ make Using FLAGS = -O -I./popt -Iinclude -I/scratch/samba-3.0.4/source/include -I/scratch/samba-3.0.4/source/ubiqx -I/scratch/samba-3.0.4/source/smbwrapper -I. -D_LARGE_FILES -I/scratch/samba-3.0.4/source LIBS = LDSHFLAGS = -Wl,-bexpall,-bM:SRE,-bnoentry,-berok -Wl,-bbigtoc LDFLAGS = -Wl,-bbigtoc Compiling nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c with -O2 nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c:748: parse error before `*' nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c: In function `wb_aix_attrlist': nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c:750: `attrlist_t' undeclared (first use in this function) nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c:750: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c:750: for each function it appears in.) nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c:750: `ret' undeclared (first use in this function) nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c:752: parse error before `)' nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c:758: parse error before `)' nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c:762: `AL_USERATTR' undeclared (first use in this function) nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c: In function `wb_aix_init': nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c:981: structure has no member named `method_version' nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c:981: `SECMETHOD_VERSION_520' undeclared (first use in this function) nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c:990: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c:994: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c:999: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.c:1001: structure has no member named `method_attrlist' make: *** [nsswitch/winbind_nss_aix.po] Error 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/scratch/samba-3.0.4/source$ attrlist_t seems to be undeclared and I can't find it anyhwere, neither in the source nor elsewhere on the AIX machine. Did anybody encounter the same problem? What am I missing and how can it be fixed? Regards, Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] NT4 Samba 3.0.2 and LDAP
Hi, We're using a Samba domain with about 50 Windows 2000/XP clients. We don't have any problems adding XP or 2000 clients to the domain. Now we have one NT4 server that needs to be migrated to the samba domain and this causes problems. When adding the server to the domain with the option add machine account, the system tells me he can't find the domain. If i browse the network from the NT4 server i can access the domain controller without any problems. So i went for the manual way, using smbldap-password -w machine. I see the account in my LDAP, but SIDs!!! When trying to add the machine without creatinga new machine account it reports me it can't find the machine account on the domain. When i look in my LDAP the machine account is gone!!! So i've googled a bit around en checked the samba mailinglists and i found a prblem with clear text passwords. So i applied the registry patch mentioned, but no succes. Does anyone else ever had this problem and solved it? Please help me... We're using Samba 3.0.2(Red Hat has not updated their packages yet)on Red Hat Enterprise V3.0 Server Edition with OpenLDAP 2.0.17-11. Thanx in advance, Cristian. *nix systems administrator. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Overriding printer settings
A question here - when using Samba with LPRng, Samba can get printer information and settings from the printcap. How can I then override the settings (e.g. print command, or comment, or something else) of one printer without having to specify all other settings too? If I just specify a share for it, then it will ignore everything from printcap, and I have to specify everything (even 'printable = yes'). Thanks, -- Tom -- Tom Alsberg - hacker (being the best description fitting this space) Web page: http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~alsbergt/ DISCLAIMER: The above message does not even necessarily represent what my fingers have typed on the keyboard, save anything further. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Winbind problem
I have setup winbind and samba as instructed in the instructions but keep getting error looking up domain users Can anyone advise on where to look please Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] config question
Hi ! I have to run my openldap server on non standard port - 390. Is this expression correct (from smb.conf - samba 3.0.4): passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost:390 If not, how to setup samba to bind different port when connecting to ldap server. greetz boka -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] not working : valid users = @DOM+USER
Hi again, I tested again, and I found that winbind return Windows groups up to the OS limit (16 by default in Solaris 9). The group I wanted to check against was mapped as 22nd in the list, so the check failed. One solution would be to rise the limit to 32 on Solaris (using set ngroups_max = 32 in /etc/system), but that would only shift the problem until someone has 33 groups. This is a very basic problem : one would assume winbind is needed for large organizations. My customer is large (55'000 users), so people are usually in a lot of groups (I have found 30-60 is not unusual, one had 84 memberships). So we have a dead-lock : you should use winbind when you don't want to manage large user lists, but can't due to group limitations. And no, recompiling Solaris (or Linux) with a larger limit is not an option. I'm now investigating another solution (calling it a kludge would be more appropriate) : - set preexec check_ldap $u %S on the share - pass user and group as parameter - check valid group membership using LDAP to AD - return true|false so preexec close deny|allow access If it works, I will post check_ldap here. I plan to use Perl and Net::LDAP for this job. Charles On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:26:18 +0200 Charles Bueche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Steve, strange... so it just fallback to Win groups if it doesn't find local groups ? I ahve studied the source, mainly lib/username.c and friends. I have seen that it try to look up the name without the domain prefix, which fail (same effect as in wbinfo). I'm now away from this customer site, I will have to wait tomorrow to test again. I will report my results. Am I right to assume that I don't need pam for this ? My goal is to use AD for Samba, but local passwd/groups for the logins. Charles On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 15:47:40 +0100 Spaceboy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Charles, I've just done this here on Solaris 8. I have found slightly odd behaviour in that wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g only return the actual usernames and groups rather than DOMAIN+Username and DOMAIN+Groupname. So in my smb.conf file I needed:- valid users = @Groupname without the DOMAIN+ part. And yes I've set winbind seperator = + as well. Just a thought. Steve Charles Bueche wrote: Hi, I have Samba 3.0.4 on Solaris 9, recent patches applied. Samba is integrated in domain (security = domain). I have compiled and configured winbind, but not pam and no ldap. Ncsd is stopped. Winbind works OK, I can connect to share and users get mapped on-the-fly to UNIX uids and gids in the ranges specified in smb.conf. My config is included below with some tweaks to protect the innocent. --- My goal : I want to create a share and restrict its access based on the membership of a Windows group. I have successfuly used : valid users = DOM+user1 DOM+user2 DOM+user3 but when I try : valid users = @DOM+wingroup or : valid users = +DOM+wingroup It refuses me access to the share, even if I'm member of the Windows group. What do I do wrong ? How should I write the groupnames ? Help wanted... -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- Charles Bueche [EMAIL PROTECTED] sand, snow, wave, wind and net -surfer -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- Charles Bueche [EMAIL PROTECTED] sand, snow, wave, wind and net -surfer -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] can´t see shares from 98 to XP
I have a samba server (3.0.4) as a domain controller for windows clients. Users can log on to my domain from Win 98 and XP, from server I can see and connect to shares I have on windows, server shares are also accessible to win clients. The only problem is that from 98 I can see XP computer but when I try to connect to shares I get an error message \\x is not accessible. this device does not exist on the network. I can ping XP by name and ip, no problem with this. From XP to 98 it works, I can see and access shares. Between 2 XP boxes it works, I can see computers and access shares from one to another. I use encrypted passwords on samba server and also windows. If you have any ideea what might be the problem, please let me know it. 10x, Jorge __ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba with acl support as member auf a samba controlled domain?
Hi we got it working. There were two poblems. -we had to update the samba PDC to 3.0.4 (formerly 3.0.1), because an error. -we had to use winbindwithout a uid and gid range some tests for winbind [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# wbinfo -t checking the trust secret via RPC calls succeeded This message I get after installing 3.0,4 on the pdc. Without samba 3.01 on ther PDC there was an error [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# wbinfo -g ... Management itsdgroup [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# wbinfo -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# wbinfo -u Administrator itsd krocka maurer trinkl Find attched my smb.conf for the client Greetings Hansjörg [global] log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m #log level = 3 passdb:5 auth:10 winbind:5 log level =0 security = domain workgroup = ITSYSTEMS encrypt passwords = yes netbios name = chardonnay server string = Install-Server password server = 192.168.0.1 machine password timeout = 60480 winbind trusted domains only = yes winbind use default domain = yes winbind nested groups = yes idmap uid = 1-1 idmap gid = 1-1 guest account = gast os level=25 wins support = no wins server = 192.168.0.1 dns proxy = no username map = /etc/samba/smbusers #preferred master = no #domain master = no #local master = no name resolve order = wins hosts socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 hosts allow = 192.168.0. bind interfaces only = Yes interfaces = 127.0.0.1, bond0 deadtime=180 keepalive = 3600 unix charset = iso8859-15 display charset = iso8859-15 [install] comment = Install Verzeichnis path = /install read only = no # security mask = 0770 # force group = itsdgroup # force user = itsd # force create mode = 0664 # create mask = 0664 # directory mask = 0777 [backup] comment = Backup von Kunden path = /backup read only = no force group = itsdgroup force user = itsd force create mode = 0664 create mask = 0664 directory mask = 0777 Guillaume Anfroy wrote: Guten tag, I am trying to make the acl working on a domain with a single samba server(as a PDC). I've checked the docs, the newsgroup and I haven't found any information about anyone who did in any other way that with a Windows(tm) PDC. I will try to get a confirmation on that information and I will keep you informed. Unless you already get the confirmation that it is impossible to make samba works with acl withtout a Windows PDS or AD server ? Regards, Guillaume - Original Message - From: Dr. Hansjörg Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: linux.samba Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 10:30 PM Subject: [Samba] samba with acl support as member auf a samba controlled domain? Hi I am running a Samba PDC and a Samba member server in his domain. The member server acts as a file server with unix acl's working. Is it possible to get these acl's working under samba to? The docs seem to say, that acl's are only possible if samba is a memberserver in an NT-Domain using winbind. In my case the PDC acts as a LDAP Server and the Member server is gets the unix account information from Ldap. I am running samba 3.0.4 and had no sucesse with this setup. The windows client shows acls not as for the domain\user but for the memberserver\user Here is my smb.conf [global] log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m log level =2 security = domain workgroup = ITSYSTEMS encrypt passwords = yes netbios name = chardonnay server string = Install-Server password server = 192.168.0.1 machine password timeout = 60480 guest account = gast os level=25 wins support = no wins server = 192.168.0.1 dns proxy = no username map = /etc/smbusers preferred master = no domain master = no local master = no name resolve order = wins hosts socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 hosts allow = 192.168.0. bind interfaces only = Yes deadtime=180 keepalive = 3600 unix charset = iso8859-15 display charset = iso8859-15 [install] comment = Install Verzeichnis path = /install read only = no public = yes Thank you very much Hansjörg Maurer -- Dr. Hansjörg Maurer itsystems Deutschland AG Linprunstr. 10 D-80335 München Ph/Fax +49 89 52 04 68-41/-59 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- _ Dr. Hansjoerg Maurer | LAN- System-Manager | Deutsches Zentrum | DLR Oberpfaffenhofen f. Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. | Institut f. Robotik | Postfach 1116 | Muenchner Strasse 20 82230 Wessling | 82234 Wessling Germany | | Tel: 08153/28-2431 | E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: 08153/28-1134 | WWW: http://www.robotic.dlr.de/ __ There are 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't. -- To unsubscribe
[Samba] Samba and openldap trouble
I have separated samba-3.0.2a and openldap-2.1 on two different computers with self made openssl certificate. Openldap seams to work on both computers. I can make accounts and they appear in the openldap account data base. When I do a net groupmap list I get: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/samba/bin# ./net groupmap list [2004/06/08 13:24:12, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open_connection(611) Failed to issue the StartTLS instruction: Operations error [2004/06/08 13:24:12, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_suffix(1113) smbldap_search_suffix: Problem during the LDAP search: TLS already started (Operations error) Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1027936538-659792286-2162639956-512) - wheel Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1027936538-659792286-2162639956-513) - smbusers Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1027936538-659792286-2162639956-514) - smbguests Administrators (S-1-5-21-1027936538-659792286-2162639956-544) - 544 users (S-1-5-21-1027936538-659792286-2162639956-545) - 545 Guests (S-1-5-21-1027936538-659792286-2162639956-546) - 546 Power Users (S-1-5-21-1027936538-659792286-2162639956-547) - 547 Account Operators (S-1-5-21-1027936538-659792286-2162639956-548) - 548 Server Operators (S-1-5-21-1027936538-659792286-2162639956-549) - 549 Print Operators (S-1-5-21-1027936538-659792286-2162639956-550) - 550 Backup Operators (S-1-5-21-1027936538-659792286-2162639956-551) - 551 Replicator (S-1-5-21-1027936538-659792286-2162639956-552) - 552 Domain Computers (S-1-5-21-1027936538-659792286-2162639956-553) - 553 What does TLS already started mean? Is there already an open session somewhere? If I do a: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/samba/bin# ./net rpc group LIST global -U administrator Password: My secret.tdb password The username or password was not correct. If I log it through d 127 I get in the end: [2004/06/08 13:34:43, 3] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_session_setup(820) SPENGO login failed: Logon failure [2004/06/08 13:34:43, 1] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_full_connection(1425) failed session setup with NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE [2004/06/08 13:34:43, 1] utils/net.c:connect_to_ipc(150) Cannot connect to server. Error was NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE [2004/06/08 13:34:43, 10] intl/lang_tdb.c:lang_tdb_init(135) lang_tdb_init: /usr/local/samba/lib/C.msg: No such file or directory The username or password was not correct. [2004/06/08 13:34:44, 2] utils/net.c:main(767) return code = -1 It looks like samba is unable to communicate with ldap the right way When I made the smbldap_populate.pl it couldnt use the hashed password. I had to type it in clear text. Is this correct? Do I need to have some PAM support in the openldap end? In short turns. What is the differences in configurations between having openldap on the same computer and a different one accept for adding the name of the ldap-server on the samba-server Peter Nyberg Institutionen för Biokemi och Biofysik (DBB) Sv.Arrhenius vägen 12 106 91 Stockholm Tel: 08-16 24 69 Mobil: 070 339 24 69 Fax 08 153679 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] XP Joining domain
How does pdbedit help me join a Windows XP client to my Samba domain? I've read through all the howto section on domain membership. Unfortunately the online howto section doesn't have page numbers. :( According to the docs I can either add passwd backend = smbpasswd or just delete the option from the config file, if the option doesn't exist 3.0 falls back to smbpasswd used in 2.2. The ultimate goal is to move to ldap. But I can't do that until I get samba 3 working. But why should the back prevent XP from properly setting the machine password? NT 4 and 2K both happily join the domain set their password and play VERY nice. On the client side XP tells me it joined the domain, but when I try and login it gives me a machine account error messages (see below). If I login as the local Administrator I can even map a drive to the samba server. Logon error Windows cannot connect to the domain, either because the domain controller is down or otherwise unavailable, or because your computer account was not found. Please try again later. Thanks for the help! Derek On Jun 7, 2004, at 3:31 PM, Jason Gray wrote: Have you tried pdbedit? Also, If you read the pages 123 - 138 in the Samba-How-to Collection you will get a great trouble-shooting section and methods to get your machines and users to connect to your PDC. You will also need to add the passwd backend = smbpasswd to your smb.conf file...among other things. You might want to think about migrating to the tdb password backend instead. It's more reliable. Jason -Original Message- From: Derek Harkness [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 12:00 PM To: Jason Gray Subject: Re: [Samba] XP Joining domain More details... I'm not using ldap, currently using the smbpasswd backend. I'm exploring the migration path from a samba 2.2 installation to samba 3.0. I'm using the add machine script which is creating an account in the unix password file, then an account is created in the smbpasswd file but the account is disabled. /etc/samba/smbpasswd:xptest$:27652:: :[DW ]:LCT-: /etc/passwd:xptest$:x:27652:968:NTMachine:/dev/null:/bin/false My samba configure is more or less default. Changed things like workgroup, load printers = no, and added the needed domain options. Thanks, Derek On Jun 7, 2004, at 2:40 PM, Jason Gray wrote: There is a machine account and user account needed to login. It sounds like you are using LDAP. If this is the case you need to make sure that a password is set for the user using smbpasswd username. It would be helpful to see your smb.conf file as well. There are various tools that you can use to add both machine and user accounts in the LDAP backend. If you are using something else as your password backend then let em know what that is too. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Derek Harkness Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 11:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] XP Joining domain I'm attempting to join a Samba 3.0.4 domain on a Debian linux box, with a Windows XP client. Problems 1) Can only get the join to work if I use the root account. On Win2k I can use any account in the Domain Admins group. 2) The join succeeds, the unix account and the smb account are created but the smb account is disabled, and the password contains all s. Joining the domain works fine from Win2k. I've tried adjusting the Signing entries. I tried manually creating the machine accounts, and I get a can't access machine account error on login. Any thoughts? Thanks! Derek This world is a comedy to those who think and a tragedy to those who feel. My lack of knowledge is only exceeded by my lack of concern. --Anonymous GE Engineer Isn't sanity just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean, all you get is that one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, well, the sky's the limit! The Tick (comic book) PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Re: Apostrophes in Windows usernames (again)
We tried that also. It didn't work either. But since I was pointed to bug 1221, I removed the matching of an apostrophe in util_str.c (fell back to 2.2 behaviour) and that looks like it works. My user is able to map his shares again. Thanks for all who helped. Mike -Original Message- From: David Brodbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 4:23 PM To: EXT-Auleta, Michael; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Samba] Re: Apostrophes in Windows usernames (again) -Original Message- From: EXT-Auleta, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I think I've narrowed down my problem, but I still don't know where to fix it. It appears that scanning the users.map file strips out the apostrophes and the Windows ID never matches: The entry in the users.map file is: unixid = o'brienta so it should map. I've tried enclosing the Windows name in double quotes, but that didn't help. What happens if you escape the apostrophe with a backslash, like this: unixid = o\'brienta -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] dotless i problem samba3 - win98
Hello, I try samba 3.0.2a with Mandrake 10 Official release. It works pretty well but one exception, dotless i, a Turkish character. The other Turkish characters works. If any filename contains dotless i, this file/directory is inaccessible from win98 clients. I setup with Turkish locale. And i run samba with export LC_ALL=C. Otherwise it runs, but doesn't share anything. Can anyone help? Thanks Osman in smb.conf i have --- dos charset = 857 preserve case = yes at loglevel 3 some error log; (the directory name is 8 times dotless i) - [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(890) Transaction 80 of length 60 [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch message SMBgetatr (pid 4973) [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (65534, 65534) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(580) unix_clean_name [/] [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(580) unix_clean_name [] [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_getatr(523) stat of failed (No such file or directory) [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(94) error string = No such file or directory [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(134) error packet at smbd/trans2.c(1808) cmd=8 (SMBgetatr) eclass=1 ecode=2 [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(890) Transaction 81 of length 68 [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch message SMBtconX (pid 4973) [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(543) Connect path is '/var/tmp' for service [IPC$] [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(251) [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(252) se_access_check: user sid is S-1-5-21-701436314-180843404-3022834476-501 se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-701436314-180843404-3022834476-514 se_access_check: also S-1-1-0 se_access_check: also S-1-5-2 se_access_check: also S-1-5-32-546 se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-701436314-180843404-3022834476-132069 [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_init_default(203) Initialising default vfs hooks [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(251) [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(252) se_access_check: user sid is S-1-5-21-701436314-180843404-3022834476-501 se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-701436314-180843404-3022834476-514 se_access_check: also S-1-1-0 se_access_check: also S-1-5-2 se_access_check: also S-1-5-32-546 se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-701436314-180843404-3022834476-132069 [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (65534, 65534) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(705) denden (192.168.10.250) connect to service IPC$ initially as user nobody (uid=65534, gid=65534) (pid 4973) [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(326) tconX service=IPC$ [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(890) Transaction 82 of length 113 [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch message SMBtrans (pid 4973) [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (65534, 65534) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(538) trans \PIPE\LANMAN data=0 params=19 setup=0 [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(334) named pipe command on LANMAN name [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/lanman.c:api_reply(3547) Got API command 0 of form WrLeh B13BWz (tdscnt=0,tpscnt=19,mdrcnt=4096,mprcnt=8) [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/lanman.c:api_reply(3551) Doing RNetShareEnum [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/lanman.c:api_RNetShareEnum(1528) RNetShareEnum gave 5 entries of 5 (1 4096 203 4096) [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(890) Transaction 83 of length 60 [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch message SMBgetatr (pid 4973) [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (65534, 65534) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(580) unix_clean_name [/] [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(580) unix_clean_name [] [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_getatr(523) stat of failed (No such file or directory) [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(94) error string = No such file or directory [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(134) error packet at smbd/trans2.c(1808) cmd=8 (SMBgetatr) eclass=1 ecode=2 [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(890) Transaction 84 of length 113 [2004/06/08 16:21:30, 3]
[Samba] Re: Windows 2003 accessing samba
I am having a similar problem with Windows 2000 and 2003 machines. I have multiple Samba servers. Those based on RH or Mandrake with samba 2.2 work fine with 2K and 2K3. A new gentoo box with 3.0.2 does not. NT4 machines can connect fine but 2K and 2K3 cannot. 2000 gives the following errors: Using NET VIEW - System error 64 has occurred. The specified network name is no longer available. Using Map Network Drive - The mapped network drive could not be created because the following error has occurred: The specified network name is no longer available. When attempts to connect are made the following entry is made in the system log: Source: MRxSmb Event ID: 3036 The redirector detected a security signature mismatch. The connection has been disconnected. Anybody have any ideas as to what is happening here? I spent some quality time with Google and couldn't turn up anything useful. Thanks Dave K. Ramon Berger wrote: All of the machines can access the Samba shares, but I can not access the shares from the Domain Controller. I even just added a Windows Server 2003 machine as a client, no Active Directory, but this machine can not access the Samba shares. The error I get is: \\samba server is not accessible... Thanks... Ramon Berger -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Authentification in windows ads 2003
Hello,
I installed Samba 3 + kerberos + winbind to make the debian server joining
the Active directory service.
Everything seems to be ok, except the authentification. If i try to go to
the share of the linux server, it asks me the password. And of course, no
way to log in. B
Here is the config:
*samba*
[global]
workgroup = TEST
realm = CARDS.BE.TEST.COM.LOCAL
server string = %h server (Samba %v)
; wins support = no
; wins server = w.x.y.z
dns proxy = no
; name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast
use spnego = yes
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 1000
; syslog only = no
syslog = 0
panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d
# separate domain and username with '+', like DOMAIN+username
winbind separator = +
# use uids from 1 to 2 for domain users
idmap uid = 1-2
# use gids from 1 to 2 for domain groups
idmap gid = 1-2
# allow enumeration of winbind users and groups
winbind enum users = yes
winbind enum groups = yes
security = ADS
encrypt passwords = yes
passdb backend = tdbsam guest
obey pam restrictions = yes
password server = zscards-pdc
netbios name = rantanplan
; guest account = nobody
invalid users = root
; unix password sync = no
; passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u# passwd chat =
*Enter\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n .
; pam password change = no
; load printers = yes
; preserve case = yes
; short preserve case = yes
; include = /home/samba/etc/smb.conf.%m
# SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
; message command = /bin/sh -c '/usr/bin/linpopup %f %m %s; rm %s'
; domain master = auto
idmap uid = 1-2
idmap gid = 1-2
; template shell = /bin/bash
[admin]
comment = Administration Directory
path = /home/benoit
admin users = bmo
browseable = yes
public = no
writable = yes
guest only = no
valid users = bmo
*kerberos*
[libdefaults]
default_realm = CAR.BE.TESTCOM
[realms]
CAR.BE.TEST.COM = {
kdc = car-pdc.cards.be.test.com
default_domain = car.be.test.com
}
#[domain_realms]
#.kerberos.server=CAR.BE.TEST.COM
# The following krb5.conf variables are only for MIT Kerberos.
default_tgs_enctypes = des3-hmac-sha1 des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5
default_tkt_enctypes = des3-hmac-sha1 des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5
permitted_enctypes = des3-hmac-sha1 des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5
krb4_config = /etc/krb.conf
krb4_realms = /etc/krb.realms
kdc_timesync = 1
ccache_type = 4
forwardable = true
proxiable = true
v4_instance_resolve = false
v4_name_convert = {
host = {
rcmd = host
ftp = ftp
}
plain = {
something = something-else
}
}
[login]
krb4_convert = true
krb4_get_tickets = true
*winbind* (logs)
2004/06/07 13:38:57, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_util.c:add_trusted_domain(180)
Added domain CAR CAR.BE.TEST.COM.LOCAL S-0-0
[2004/06/07 13:38:57, 1] libsmb/clikrb5.c:ads_krb5_mk_req(306)
krb5_cc_get_principal failed (No credentials cache found)
[2004/06/07 13:38:57, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_util.c:add_trusted_domain(180)
Added domain BUILTIN S-1-5-32
[2004/06/07 13:38:57, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_util.c:add_trusted_domain(180)
Added domain RANTANPLAN S-1-5-21-837388855-3362161430-1770541169
All commands like kinit, net ads join, wbinfo -u (-g), getent etc works.
From the linux server, no problem to go to the shares of the domain
controller (wich is a windows 2003 server).
Any help would be helpful
Regards,
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?
No good. It's still amazingly slow. It seems to perform just fine until the user tries to print. There is a huge delay before the print dialog comes up, and when the user tries to save there is another huge delay. The problem seems to be only with AutoCad. - Original Message - From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad? On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 08:59:34AM -0600, Brian Merrell wrote: Here are some smb.conf's I have tried: (I have tried SO_SNDBUF=8192, and 4096) Remove these two parameters. read prediction = true strict sync = yes Hope this helps, Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SAMBA 3.0.4 authorisation issues
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Austin, Ben wrote: | User guest in passdb, but getpwnam() fails! 'guest account' is not set to a valid unix account. cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home. --- Sting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAxcifIR7qMdg1EfYRAofOAKDdoiTET5/rHZeolLksFU0h9B2RLACgtTnP 9zDPT2iHbyvxpxuv4/c/IBE= =Zkhx -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Merrell wrote: | No good. It's still amazingly slow. It seems to perform | just fine until the user tries to print. There is a huge | delay before the print dialog comes up, and when the user | tries to save there is another huge delay. The | problem seems to be only with AutoCad. Sorry I'm late on this thread. Are these XP clients? Do the clients have a active firewall installed. If the delay is only when printing, it is probabl either (a) a very chatty printer driver, or (b) timeouts when the client tries to ~open a print change notify handle. cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home. --- Sting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAxcznIR7qMdg1EfYRAicSAKDPzwf0vrIpsTgrln1hFnUlZ/VVOgCfXjs8 XYq6cwr7pC7oqkM0DHab0eU= =I89Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Q: Samba 2.2.8a as a domain member
Hi,
I have a problem using Samba 2.2.8a on Linux (Debian) as a
domain member.
smbpasswd told me that the host successfully joined our local
domain, but acsessing a shares Security Settings through
Windows' network neighbourhood sais
HOSTNAME\user
instead of
DOMAIN\user
which is the case on our domain controllers.
I am using an OpenLDAP repository four user management.
Below is my smb.conf.
Thx in advance.
/Holger
# smb.conf
#
# $Id$
[global]
workgroup = MYDOMAIN
interfaces = 192.168.0.3
security = domain
encrypt passwords = yes
password server = pdc.mydomain.de
os level = 20
domain master = no
local master = no
map to guest = Bad User
socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY
veto files = /*.eml/*.nws/riched20.dll/*.{*}/
ldap ssl = no
ldap server = pdc.mydomain.de
ldap port = 389
ldap suffix = ou=people,dc=mydomain,dc=de
ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=mydomain,dc=de
ldap filter = ((objectClass=sambaAccount)(uid=%u))
load printers = no
[Office]
comment = Office-Daten
path = /var/data/office
write list = @office
force group = office
create mask = 0664
directory mask = 0775
guest ok = yes
pgp2usOWXnEjP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?
Thanks for your response Jerry. Yes. These are all windows XP machines. We have about four printers here in the office (all HP hehe). Only two computers have McAfee Firewalls installed, the rest do not have firewalls. We are on a 100 mbps ethernet with a 16 port hub. Nothing too fancy. AutoCad is a strange beast. No matter what printer you have set up as your default printer, when you click the print icon or give the print command, AutoCad comes up with no printer selected in the print dialog, and the user selects the plotter each time (although you can save your print selections for each drawing). I have even tried setting the default printer to the PDF distiller and it still takes the same ammount of time for the print dialog to come up. However, I was just tinkering with the print settings and noticed that the print dialog comes up normally some times. i.e. If you click cancel on the print dialog and then hit the print icon again quickly, it seems to come up normally. The other mysterious problem is the time it takes to save. I just saw a guy behind me try to save a drawing and it took about 20 seconds. Something that never happened before when the files were hosted on an older windows XP machine with a heavier load. I'm all out of ideas and really don't want to go back to windows. brian. - Original Message - From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:27 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Merrell wrote: | No good. It's still amazingly slow. It seems to perform | just fine until the user tries to print. There is a huge | delay before the print dialog comes up, and when the user | tries to save there is another huge delay. The | problem seems to be only with AutoCad. Sorry I'm late on this thread. Are these XP clients? Do the clients have a active firewall installed. If the delay is only when printing, it is probabl either (a) a very chatty printer driver, or (b) timeouts when the client tries to ~open a print change notify handle. cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home. --- Sting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAxcznIR7qMdg1EfYRAicSAKDPzwf0vrIpsTgrln1hFnUlZ/VVOgCfXjs8 XYq6cwr7pC7oqkM0DHab0eU= =I89Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?
Do you have any dns service running? Even if you're running some files based stuff (/etc/hosts) make sure that your address match names. I've had issues where they didn't match up before. Follow me here... a machine running dhcp registered itself in dns with a particular address. That user then was given a static address with a different name. The user didn't change his computer name to match dns when he went to static, and his machine didn't change its dns registration, so it was reporting itself as a name which matched a black hole IP address (because it wasn't sitting there any more). You could see in the logs where the samba spooler service would time out trying to access the dead address/name combo, and eventually windows would just time out and give you the printer box. Brian Merrell wrote: Thanks for your response Jerry. Yes. These are all windows XP machines. We have about four printers here in the office (all HP hehe). Only two computers have McAfee Firewalls installed, the rest do not have firewalls. We are on a 100 mbps ethernet with a 16 port hub. Nothing too fancy. AutoCad is a strange beast. No matter what printer you have set up as your default printer, when you click the print icon or give the print command, AutoCad comes up with no printer selected in the print dialog, and the user selects the plotter each time (although you can save your print selections for each drawing). I have even tried setting the default printer to the PDF distiller and it still takes the same ammount of time for the print dialog to come up. However, I was just tinkering with the print settings and noticed that the print dialog comes up normally some times. i.e. If you click cancel on the print dialog and then hit the print icon again quickly, it seems to come up normally. The other mysterious problem is the time it takes to save. I just saw a guy behind me try to save a drawing and it took about 20 seconds. Something that never happened before when the files were hosted on an older windows XP machine with a heavier load. I'm all out of ideas and really don't want to go back to windows. brian. - Original Message - From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:27 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Merrell wrote: | No good. It's still amazingly slow. It seems to perform | just fine until the user tries to print. There is a huge | delay before the print dialog comes up, and when the user | tries to save there is another huge delay. The | problem seems to be only with AutoCad. Sorry I'm late on this thread. Are these XP clients? Do the clients have a active firewall installed. If the delay is only when printing, it is probabl either (a) a very chatty printer driver, or (b) timeouts when the client tries to ~open a print change notify handle. cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home. --- Sting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAxcznIR7qMdg1EfYRAicSAKDPzwf0vrIpsTgrln1hFnUlZ/VVOgCfXjs8 XYq6cwr7pC7oqkM0DHab0eU= =I89Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Paul Gienger Office:701-281-1884 Applied Engineering Inc. Cell: 701-306-6254 Information Systems Consultant Fax: 701-281-1322 URL: www.ae-solutions.commailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba WINS fails to resolve isolated name
Hi, We've got Samba acting as our WINS server. All appears to be operating correctly except for a single NT 4 server which the WINS server won't resolve. - The server is NT4 Server with Exchange. - It does have the address specified in the network settings and is using the WINS server for its own resolutions. - There are wins.dat entries for this server. So why do I get: $nmblookup -U 10.0.0.1 -R server1 querying server1 on 10.0.0.1 name_query failed to find name server1 Thanks in advance, Leon... Fedora Core 2 2.6.5-1.358/Samba 3.0.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?
I am not using Samba's print service. All of the individual workstations have shared printers. We simply use those. - Original Message - From: Paul Gienger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:59 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad? Do you have any dns service running? Even if you're running some files based stuff (/etc/hosts) make sure that your address match names. I've had issues where they didn't match up before. Follow me here... a machine running dhcp registered itself in dns with a particular address. That user then was given a static address with a different name. The user didn't change his computer name to match dns when he went to static, and his machine didn't change its dns registration, so it was reporting itself as a name which matched a black hole IP address (because it wasn't sitting there any more). You could see in the logs where the samba spooler service would time out trying to access the dead address/name combo, and eventually windows would just time out and give you the printer box. Brian Merrell wrote: Thanks for your response Jerry. Yes. These are all windows XP machines. We have about four printers here in the office (all HP hehe). Only two computers have McAfee Firewalls installed, the rest do not have firewalls. We are on a 100 mbps ethernet with a 16 port hub. Nothing too fancy. AutoCad is a strange beast. No matter what printer you have set up as your default printer, when you click the print icon or give the print command, AutoCad comes up with no printer selected in the print dialog, and the user selects the plotter each time (although you can save your print selections for each drawing). I have even tried setting the default printer to the PDF distiller and it still takes the same ammount of time for the print dialog to come up. However, I was just tinkering with the print settings and noticed that the print dialog comes up normally some times. i.e. If you click cancel on the print dialog and then hit the print icon again quickly, it seems to come up normally. The other mysterious problem is the time it takes to save. I just saw a guy behind me try to save a drawing and it took about 20 seconds. Something that never happened before when the files were hosted on an older windows XP machine with a heavier load. I'm all out of ideas and really don't want to go back to windows. brian. - Original Message - From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:27 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Merrell wrote: | No good. It's still amazingly slow. It seems to perform | just fine until the user tries to print. There is a huge | delay before the print dialog comes up, and when the user | tries to save there is another huge delay. The | problem seems to be only with AutoCad. Sorry I'm late on this thread. Are these XP clients? Do the clients have a active firewall installed. If the delay is only when printing, it is probabl either (a) a very chatty printer driver, or (b) timeouts when the client tries to ~open a print change notify handle. cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home. --- Sting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAxcznIR7qMdg1EfYRAicSAKDPzwf0vrIpsTgrln1hFnUlZ/VVOgCfXjs8 XYq6cwr7pC7oqkM0DHab0eU= =I89Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Paul Gienger Office: 701-281-1884 Applied Engineering Inc. Cell: 701-306-6254 Information Systems Consultant Fax: 701-281-1322 URL: www.ae-solutions.commailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Weird Domain listings
I'm having an issue with my samba Domains. When I browse to Microsoft Windows Network with either Windows 2000 or WinXP I see two copies of the Domain. I see the proper domain (I'm using Matrix for testing) Matrix and I see another Matrix that appears to have 5 or 6 spaces or a tab appended onto the end. The domain w/o the spaces is the proper one, the one with the spaces doesn't contain any servers or workstation. This seems to have started after upgrading to samba 3.0.4. Has anyone seen this before? And if so what's the solution to this, I don't want my users to get confused. Thanks, Paul Espinosa I'm using samba 3.0.4-1 and here is the relevant portion of my smb.conf: #=== Global Settings [global] #== Services wins support = no wins server = 10.10.10.10 time server = yes #== Logging log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 loglevel=0 syslog=0 #== Server Definitions == workgroup = MATRIX server string = netbios name = zion security = user encrypt passwords = yes dns proxy = no preserve case = yes short preserve case = yes case sensitive = no username map = /etc/samba/smbusers Dos charset = 850 Unix charset = ISO8859-1 passdb backend = tdbsam socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 local master = yes domain master = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] uid and gid problems with linux as client and server
Hi, I'm using samba 3.0.4 (stock debian packages) as a client and a server. The problem is I have a different uid on server (1001) to my client (1000) so when I try and access a file I appear to the client as not being the owner. I have tried the uid and gid options in smbmount, but they do not seem to have any affect (I assume the unix cifs extensions are overiding them). On the server side I have a create mask and a directory mask of 775 but this also has no affect. This is driving me spare! Is there any way to disable the unix cifs extensions or to map between uids? Thanks, Laurence -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?
Brian I might suggest a couple of setting changes on your XP machines: 1) Open services and stop/disable Web Client 2) Open windows explorer, go to toolsfolder options, click the View tab, and uncheck the Automatically search for network folders and printers (I'm assuming Windows XP Professional on these settings) Restart and try your printers again. Bob -Original Message- From: Brian Merrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad? Thanks for your response Jerry. Yes. These are all windows XP machines. We have about four printers here in the office (all HP hehe). Only two computers have McAfee Firewalls installed, the rest do not have firewalls. We are on a 100 mbps ethernet with a 16 port hub. Nothing too fancy. AutoCad is a strange beast. No matter what printer you have set up as your default printer, when you click the print icon or give the print command, AutoCad comes up with no printer selected in the print dialog, and the user selects the plotter each time (although you can save your print selections for each drawing). I have even tried setting the default printer to the PDF distiller and it still takes the same ammount of time for the print dialog to come up. However, I was just tinkering with the print settings and noticed that the print dialog comes up normally some times. i.e. If you click cancel on the print dialog and then hit the print icon again quickly, it seems to come up normally. The other mysterious problem is the time it takes to save. I just saw a guy behind me try to save a drawing and it took about 20 seconds. Something that never happened before when the files were hosted on an older windows XP machine with a heavier load. I'm all out of ideas and really don't want to go back to windows. brian. - Original Message - From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:27 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Merrell wrote: | No good. It's still amazingly slow. It seems to perform | just fine until the user tries to print. There is a huge | delay before the print dialog comes up, and when the user | tries to save there is another huge delay. The | problem seems to be only with AutoCad. Sorry I'm late on this thread. Are these XP clients? Do the clients have a active firewall installed. If the delay is only when printing, it is probabl either (a) a very chatty printer driver, or (b) timeouts when the client tries to ~open a print change notify handle. cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home. --- Sting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAxcznIR7qMdg1EfYRAicSAKDPzwf0vrIpsTgrln1hFnUlZ/VVOgCfXjs8 XYq6cwr7pC7oqkM0DHab0eU= =I89Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] uid and gid problems with linux as client and server
Laurence, This is how I mount a samba share on my Linux workstation(all on one line): sudo mount -t smbfs -o uid=username, ip=10.10.10.10, username=username, password=password//server/share /home/mydir/dir This works for me just fine. -- Paul Espinosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Supervisor The World Company 785/312-6912 .[ Laurence Rowe wrote ] | | | Hi, | | I'm using samba 3.0.4 (stock debian packages) as a client and a server. | The problem is I have a different uid on server (1001) to my client | (1000) so when I try and access a file I appear to the client as not | being the owner. I have tried the uid and gid options in smbmount, but | they do not seem to have any affect (I assume the unix cifs extensions | are overiding them). | | On the server side I have a create mask and a directory mask of 775 but | this also has no affect. | | This is driving me spare! Is there any way to disable the unix cifs | extensions or to map between uids? | | Thanks, | | Laurence | -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Weird Domain listings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Espinosa wrote: | I'm having an issue with my samba Domains. When I | browse to Microsoft Windows Network with either Windows | 2000 or WinXP I see two copies of the Domain. I see the | proper domain (I'm using Matrix for testing) Matrix and | I see another Matrix that appears to have 5 or 6 | spaces or a tab appended onto the end. The domain w/o | the spaces is the proper one, the one with the spaces doesn't | contain any servers or workstation. | | This seems to have started after upgrading to samba 3.0.4. Our bug. This was fixed post 3.0.5pre1 cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home. --- Sting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAxeCwIR7qMdg1EfYRAv8DAJwPlx0xz665d0JV+wWhEMsfJXhAHACgmBAi Cbv4Elnj8g8dEIUp2mHt8ko= =lzzu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Share trash can?
Is there a trash can, or a way to add one, so that if a user deletes a file off the share it just goes away until a nightly purge is done? Thanks, Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] uid and gid problems with linux as client and server
Hi Paul, with the same request and Samba 3.0.4, it works fine only for the mount point, there is no recursive propagation of uid/gid. # ll /home/mydir/dir drwxr-xr-x1 lapinlapin4096 2004-06-08 14:15 dir # ll /home/mydir/dir/file -rwxrwx---1 1004 100 2901504 1940-10-24 04:26 file Selon Paul Espinosa [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Laurence, This is how I mount a samba share on my Linux workstation(all on one line): sudo mount -t smbfs -o uid=username, ip=10.10.10.10, username=username, password=password//server/share /home/mydir/dir This works for me just fine. -- Paul Espinosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Supervisor The World Company 785/312-6912 .[ Laurence Rowe wrote ] | | | Hi, | | I'm using samba 3.0.4 (stock debian packages) as a client and a server. | The problem is I have a different uid on server (1001) to my client | (1000) so when I try and access a file I appear to the client as not | being the owner. I have tried the uid and gid options in smbmount, but | they do not seem to have any affect (I assume the unix cifs extensions | are overiding them). | | On the server side I have a create mask and a directory mask of 775 but | this also has no affect. | | This is driving me spare! Is there any way to disable the unix cifs | extensions or to map between uids? | | Thanks, | | Laurence | -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] XP Joining domain
Okay more information... XP can join my Samba 2.2 domain without any trouble. But with my Samba 3.0.4 PDC it join but it puts all Xs in the password file and the account is disabled. I've turned the log level up but don't see any blatant error messages. I'm not sure if this is a related problem but when I copied the smbpasswd file from my Samba 2.2 PDC to the 3.0.4 PDC, samba started disabling accounts when users logged in. Again all Xs in the password file and a D flag to disable the account. Why would it be disabling accounts? Thanks, Derek On Jun 8, 2004, at 8:13 AM, Derek Harkness wrote: How does pdbedit help me join a Windows XP client to my Samba domain? I've read through all the howto section on domain membership. Unfortunately the online howto section doesn't have page numbers. :( According to the docs I can either add passwd backend = smbpasswd or just delete the option from the config file, if the option doesn't exist 3.0 falls back to smbpasswd used in 2.2. The ultimate goal is to move to ldap. But I can't do that until I get samba 3 working. But why should the back prevent XP from properly setting the machine password? NT 4 and 2K both happily join the domain set their password and play VERY nice. On the client side XP tells me it joined the domain, but when I try and login it gives me a machine account error messages (see below). If I login as the local Administrator I can even map a drive to the samba server. Logon error Windows cannot connect to the domain, either because the domain controller is down or otherwise unavailable, or because your computer account was not found. Please try again later. Thanks for the help! Derek On Jun 7, 2004, at 3:31 PM, Jason Gray wrote: Have you tried pdbedit? Also, If you read the pages 123 - 138 in the Samba-How-to Collection you will get a great trouble-shooting section and methods to get your machines and users to connect to your PDC. You will also need to add the passwd backend = smbpasswd to your smb.conf file...among other things. You might want to think about migrating to the tdb password backend instead. It's more reliable. Jason -Original Message- From: Derek Harkness [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 12:00 PM To: Jason Gray Subject: Re: [Samba] XP Joining domain More details... I'm not using ldap, currently using the smbpasswd backend. I'm exploring the migration path from a samba 2.2 installation to samba 3.0. I'm using the add machine script which is creating an account in the unix password file, then an account is created in the smbpasswd file but the account is disabled. /etc/samba/smbpasswd:xptest$:27652:: :[DW ]:LCT-: /etc/passwd:xptest$:x:27652:968:NTMachine:/dev/null:/bin/false My samba configure is more or less default. Changed things like workgroup, load printers = no, and added the needed domain options. Thanks, Derek On Jun 7, 2004, at 2:40 PM, Jason Gray wrote: There is a machine account and user account needed to login. It sounds like you are using LDAP. If this is the case you need to make sure that a password is set for the user using smbpasswd username. It would be helpful to see your smb.conf file as well. There are various tools that you can use to add both machine and user accounts in the LDAP backend. If you are using something else as your password backend then let em know what that is too. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Derek Harkness Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 11:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] XP Joining domain I'm attempting to join a Samba 3.0.4 domain on a Debian linux box, with a Windows XP client. Problems 1) Can only get the join to work if I use the root account. On Win2k I can use any account in the Domain Admins group. 2) The join succeeds, the unix account and the smb account are created but the smb account is disabled, and the password contains all s. Joining the domain works fine from Win2k. I've tried adjusting the Signing entries. I tried manually creating the machine accounts, and I get a can't access machine account error on login. Any thoughts? Thanks! Derek This world is a comedy to those who think and a tragedy to those who feel. My lack of knowledge is only exceeded by my lack of concern. --Anonymous GE Engineer Isn't sanity just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean, all you get is that one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, well, the sky's the limit! The Tick (comic book) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba 0 and 1. Now what could be so hard about that? PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions:
Re: [Samba] Re: Apostrophes in Windows usernames (again)
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 08:32:10AM -0400, EXT-Auleta, Michael wrote: We tried that also. It didn't work either. But since I was pointed to bug 1221, I removed the matching of an apostrophe in util_str.c (fell back to 2.2 behaviour) and that looks like it works. My user is able to map his shares again. Thanks for pointing that one out, I'm going to merge that for 3.0.5. Cheers, Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Share trash can?
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:55 , Robert Sossomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent: Is there a trash can, or a way to add one, so that if a user deletes a file off the share it just goes away until a nightly purge is done? kind of - you can make a morning mirror to a different direcory using pointers /samba = data directory /mirror = mirror directory cp -al /samba/* /mirror/* if someone deletes something it still exists in the mirror till you delete the mirror for the next day's mirror - but in essesce, this technique uses so little space that you can have weeks and weeks of DELTA changes files..it is harder to explain than view..for example, I have 6 months of backups tkaing up less than 5% more diskspace than the actual files themselves (this of course is use determined) Thanks, Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba --- Chris McKeever If you want to reply directly to me, please use cgmckeever--at--prupref---dot---com A href=http://www.prupref.com;www.prupref.com/A Prudential Preferred Properties A href=http://www.prupref.com;Chicago and Illinois NorthShore Real Estate Experts/A Prudential Preferred Properties www.prupref.com Success Driven By Results Results Driven By Commitment Commitment Driven By Integrity We Are Prudential Preferred Properties -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] hide unreadable
?? Hello everyone I am trying to use hide unreadable = yes in my [global] section and having some problems - I make a share and then add valid users = @MYDOMAIN+group - this works to protect access, but it is still visible to non-priveleged users (even though they cant get in) - is there something I need to do to make these shares hidden? Hi This is not supposed to work with share. It works with files and directory. For share you could try browseable = No in the share definition. -- Marcel de Riedmatten -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Apostrophes in Windows usernames (again)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy Allison wrote: | | We tried that also. It didn't work either. But since | I was pointed to bug1221, I removed the matching of an | apostrophe in util_str.c (fell back to2.2 behaviour) and that | looks like it works. My user is able to map his | shares again. | | | Thanks for pointing that one out, I'm going to | merge that for 3.0.5. please don't. The change was done to fix SWAT and I haven't figured out how to fix one without breaking the other. I just need some time to think and code up a workable solution. cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home. --- Sting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAxfKtIR7qMdg1EfYRAt+DAKDBboEEOgpsGrn9bOkvmnYgf4hxdQCffpnL RA44/BxyimK0QIcKpz5eWO8= =WsjG -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?
Brian, 1. Which release of AutoCAD are you using? 2. Are the support files for AutoCAD on the client or the server? 3. Are you using cups? 4. Is it true that your plotter settings are not being saved with the drawing? Was this true when you were using a windows server? 5. Normally when AutoCAD is opening the print dialog box in an existing drawing, it is trying to find the printer that was used by the last session of Autocad. If it can't find that printer, it produces the printer none. Are you loading your printers from the server such that each client has the identical printer name? 6. Are the network directories being used by AutoCAD the same as being used by the other programs that don't exhibit the long save times? We use AutoCAD 2000, 2002, 2004 with RH E3.0 and Samba 3.0.2-6.3E with no delays in saving or printing and have achieved better performance than the previous W2k server. With a little more information we might be able to assist in finding the bottleneck. Terry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Turner Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:45 AM To: 'Brian Merrell'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad? Brian I might suggest a couple of setting changes on your XP machines: 1) Open services and stop/disable Web Client 2) Open windows explorer, go to toolsfolder options, click the View tab, and uncheck the Automatically search for network folders and printers (I'm assuming Windows XP Professional on these settings) Restart and try your printers again. Bob -Original Message- From: Brian Merrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad? Thanks for your response Jerry. Yes. These are all windows XP machines. We have about four printers here in the office (all HP hehe). Only two computers have McAfee Firewalls installed, the rest do not have firewalls. We are on a 100 mbps ethernet with a 16 port hub. Nothing too fancy. AutoCad is a strange beast. No matter what printer you have set up as your default printer, when you click the print icon or give the print command, AutoCad comes up with no printer selected in the print dialog, and the user selects the plotter each time (although you can save your print selections for each drawing). I have even tried setting the default printer to the PDF distiller and it still takes the same ammount of time for the print dialog to come up. However, I was just tinkering with the print settings and noticed that the print dialog comes up normally some times. i.e. If you click cancel on the print dialog and then hit the print icon again quickly, it seems to come up normally. The other mysterious problem is the time it takes to save. I just saw a guy behind me try to save a drawing and it took about 20 seconds. Something that never happened before when the files were hosted on an older windows XP machine with a heavier load. I'm all out of ideas and really don't want to go back to windows. brian. - Original Message - From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:27 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Merrell wrote: | No good. It's still amazingly slow. It seems to perform | just fine until the user tries to print. There is a huge | delay before the print dialog comes up, and when the user | tries to save there is another huge delay. The | problem seems to be only with AutoCad. Sorry I'm late on this thread. Are these XP clients? Do the clients have a active firewall installed. If the delay is only when printing, it is probabl either (a) a very chatty printer driver, or (b) timeouts when the client tries to ~open a print change notify handle. cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home. --- Sting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAxcznIR7qMdg1EfYRAicSAKDPzwf0vrIpsTgrln1hFnUlZ/VVOgCfXjs8 XYq6cwr7pC7oqkM0DHab0eU= =I89Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions:
Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?
Terry, Thanks a lot for your reply. We're really trying to solve this problem. Brian, 1. Which release of AutoCAD are you using? Autodesk Land Desktop 2004 2004.0.0 Service Pack 1 2. Are the support files for AutoCAD on the client or the server? On the clients. 3. Are you using cups? No. 4. Is it true that your plotter settings are not being saved with the drawing? Was this true when you were using a windows server? They are being saved with the drawings. They were also being saved with the drawings on the windows server. (the windows server was actually just another client that shared it's HD). 5. Normally when AutoCAD is opening the print dialog box in an existing drawing, it is trying to find the printer that was used by the last session of Autocad. If it can't find that printer, it produces the printer none. Are you loading your printers from the server such that each client has the identical printer name? First of all, you're right. The print dialog only produces the printer none when it's a new drawing. Otherwise, it saves the print settings. But we still experience a delay independant of whether we are printing from a new drawing or an existing one. The printers aren't on the server, and we do not have identical printer name. 6. Are the network directories being used by AutoCAD the same as being used by the other programs that don't exhibit the long save times? No. AutoCad drawings are stored on a seperate harddrive and a different directory. However, after reading this e-mail I moved a TIF image to the autocad directory and opened them from Adobe Photoshop. I then modified and saved the drawing and there was no delay. There was also no delay for opening a print dialog. The problem continues to be only with AutoCad. We use AutoCAD 2000, 2002, 2004 with RH E3.0 and Samba 3.0.2-6.3E with no delays in saving or printing and have achieved better performance than the previous W2k server. With a little more information we might be able to assist in finding the bottleneck. Terry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Turner Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:45 AM To: 'Brian Merrell'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad? Brian I might suggest a couple of setting changes on your XP machines: 1) Open services and stop/disable Web Client 2) Open windows explorer, go to toolsfolder options, click the View tab, and uncheck the Automatically search for network folders and printers (I'm assuming Windows XP Professional on these settings) Restart and try your printers again. Bob -Original Message- From: Brian Merrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad? Thanks for your response Jerry. Yes. These are all windows XP machines. We have about four printers here in the office (all HP hehe). Only two computers have McAfee Firewalls installed, the rest do not have firewalls. We are on a 100 mbps ethernet with a 16 port hub. Nothing too fancy. AutoCad is a strange beast. No matter what printer you have set up as your default printer, when you click the print icon or give the print command, AutoCad comes up with no printer selected in the print dialog, and the user selects the plotter each time (although you can save your print selections for each drawing). I have even tried setting the default printer to the PDF distiller and it still takes the same ammount of time for the print dialog to come up. However, I was just tinkering with the print settings and noticed that the print dialog comes up normally some times. i.e. If you click cancel on the print dialog and then hit the print icon again quickly, it seems to come up normally. The other mysterious problem is the time it takes to save. I just saw a guy behind me try to save a drawing and it took about 20 seconds. Something that never happened before when the files were hosted on an older windows XP machine with a heavier load. I'm all out of ideas and really don't want to go back to windows. brian. - Original Message - From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:27 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Merrell wrote: | No good. It's still amazingly slow. It seems to perform | just fine until the user tries to print. There is a huge | delay before the print dialog comes up, and when the user | tries to save there is another huge delay. The | problem seems to be only with AutoCad. Sorry I'm late on this thread. Are these XP clients? Do the clients have a active firewall installed. If the delay is only when printing, it is probabl either
[Samba] example trash can
Hi, I've the Samba howto but am a bit confused on how to implement vfs to use the desktop trash can for Samba shares. Would anyone mind giving me an example? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Identical machine name problem
hello im trying to rejoin one machine which i scratch-installed on my domain and when i boot up my pc it says Machine has same name on the network or something like that how can i remove the name in my samba server and rejoin this pc successfully on my domain i tried deleting it in smbpasswd and deluser on my debian linux box but still the message appears thanks a lot -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba 3.0.4 and AD
Hi, Has any of you successfully configured Samba 3.0.4 to work with AD? I am not sure that works at all or I should use version 3.0.0. Thanks, Vahid. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?
Make sure your network doesn't have any problems with mismatched duplex settings, excessive collisions, etc. I had this problem once and it crippled anything that tried to copy a large file to the server. It showed up worst with AutoCAD because it generated the most network traffic. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: AW: [Samba] why doesn't Samba Server want my password?
I just want to see the security level (user, share, ad, , server, domain) The testparm output show all param, could you send this output ? wuelf a écrit : Testparm says revalidate is an unknown command and is ignored. I erased the revalidate lines but nothing changed wuelf -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Stéphane Purnelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Juni 2004 22:07 An: wuelf Betreff: Re: [Samba] why doesn't Samba Server want my password? wuelf a écrit : hello, I've got a strange problem here. i set up a samba server on a trustix linux system, everything works fine except for the fact that a user on a windows machine can log on to his account on the server without having to give a password. He's logged on on the Winxp pc with his username(same as on the server) but without a password. i don't understand what's going on, I guess it's something quite trivial but so far neither google nor the howtos I've read have given me an answer, hope someone can help me. here's my smb.conf: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) # Date: 2004/06/06 17:22:14 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = NETZ server string = Samba Server interfaces = eth0 passdb backend = tdbsam log file = /var/log/samba/log.%I max log size = 50 os level = 32 preferred master = No domain master = No default service = homes [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S read only = No browseable = No [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/samba/netlogon guest ok = Yes share modes = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No [Projekte] path = /data/projekte valid users = u1, u2, u3 read only = No What the testparm says ? -- Stéphane Purnelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Site Web : http://www.linuxplusvalue.be -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba, LDAP and machine account weirdness....
Hi I am using Samba 3.0.2 with LDAP as the passdb backend for both user accounts and for machine accounts. I have noticed something which looks a bit strange. It seems that at least some machines (I don't think all machines, but can't be sure as of yet) appear to be having sambaPwdCanChange and sambaPwdLastChange modified in their account entry in the LDAP tree. I thought that the only time any machine account attributes would be added/altered is when the machine account is initially added. One machine seems to be having these attributes in its machine account altered every 15 minutes.other machines seem to only have this occur once or twice. Another strange thing I have noticed is that for all of these machines, both the sambaLMPassword and sambaNTPassword hashes are identical.I thought that these would/should always be different (open to correction on this ;-) Everything seems to work OK, but this is generating some load on our LDAP servers (master and replicas) and also I am concerned that perhaps we have been hacked or perhaps a Windoze virus is causing this to happen. However, I am not aware of any viruses which attack an NT domain server and cause machine accounts to be altered.besides, the virus would need to know a login/password with sufficient privilege to update the machine account via samba. Could this be a hack or a virus? Or is there any setting in Windoze (registry or something) which would cause a machine to try to update its machine account in some way? Or is there anything else which might cause this (eg: a difference in the time on samba and LDAP servers?)? Sorry if this seems a but vague and lacking any more detail, but I am baffled myself. If anyone has any suggestions or advice I would be most grateful. Thanx in advance. Chris Bradshaw -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] What about domain trusts
Say between a Samba 3.0.4 and win2k machine? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] What about domain trusts
On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 16:40, Tom Skeren wrote: Say between a Samba 3.0.4 and win2k machine? YES. Can be done. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba 3.0.4 ldap replication and tls will not work
I recently installed samba 3.0.4 with ldap on fedora core 1 and 2. Eveything works fine except for when I turn on tls which I need for secuity. I get tls handshake errors and nothing will work. I had the same setup with redhat 7.1 samba 2.28 and ldap and tls worked great. I seem to have tracked it down to the ldap libraries. If I use ldap libraries 2.1.16 or up the tls handshake errors show up. If I use ldap libraries lower than this tls will work if pointed to the master but if pointed to a slave ldap server a segmentaion fault happens when I try to change passwords or add machines. Replication works fine with tls off. Any ideas if this is a bug in samba, ldap or has something changed in samba 3 and I am doing something wrong -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] What about domain trusts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greg Folkert wrote: | On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 16:40, Tom Skeren wrote: | |Say between a Samba 3.0.4 and win2k machine? for what's its worth, there is a bug in Samba 3.0.5pre1 and previous that prevents you from verifying the trusts using the Win2k mmc plugin (although the trust works fine). This was recently fixed and will be working in 3.0.5pre2 (not eta on that release right now). cheers, jerry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAxjw8IR7qMdg1EfYRAiNjAKDq0XyBWWpL151pmJ1R/ENnKbGrmACg3YgF c2ixkA5LOxWsYD5zIFO7r2Q= =imlP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] What about domain trusts
Any info would be appreciated. I've added the samba server as a one way trust in win2k, but the domain machines can't access the sambaa share (access denied) although the win2k servers can. Really would like the samba server to show up in DFS, well it does, but the users acces is denied. Greg Folkert wrote: On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 16:40, Tom Skeren wrote: Say between a Samba 3.0.4 and win2k machine? YES. Can be done. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] What about domain trusts
On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 18:24, Tom Skeren wrote: Any info would be appreciated. I've added the samba server as a one way trust in win2k, but the domain machines can't access the sambaa share (access denied) although the win2k servers can. Really would like the samba server to show up in DFS, well it does, but the users acces is denied. Greg Folkert wrote: On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 16:40, Tom Skeren wrote: Say between a Samba 3.0.4 and win2k machine? YES. Can be done. http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/howto/InterdomainTrusts.html http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/howto/msdfs.html Good luck -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] REMEMBER ED CURRY! http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry Novell's Directory Services is a competitive product to Microsoft's Active Directory in much the same way that the Saturn V is a competitive product to those dinky little model rockets that kids light off down at the playfield. -- Thane Walkup signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] School Project....
Hello... I am currently enrolled at St. Clair County Community College, with four colleges we were assigned to build a Samba Server, in our Server + class. We have a deadline of four weeks, and in hopes of receiving t-shirts, ball caps, for our own team samba, when it comes time to go live with our server. Never hearing of Samba, now doing research and planning, we are looking forward to creating this server. If you could find it in your heart, to help college students, it would be the cherry on the cake for our presentation. Sizes 3 larges, 2 Xtra larges. Paul M. Hibbert 6421 Dyke Rd Algonac, MI 48001 _ Getting married? Find great tips, tools and the latest trends at MSN Life Events. http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=married -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] School Project....
If you could find it in your heart, to help college students, it would be the cherry on the cake for our presentation. Sizes 3 larges, 2 Xtra larges. Paul: Exactly what part of the process do you need help with? Matthew -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Win98 Network File Caching?
Hi Guys, This is a strange one. We use Samba on a SCO UNIX Box that shares various files out. If you are on a Win98 system and copy a text document over to the local disk on win98 and then modify the file on a single line from the SCO system and then re-copy that file again to the 98 box it doesn't recognise any difference. It doesn't appear to occur with XP and Linux systems mounting the Samba shares at all. So I am assuming this is a problem with Win98? Can anyone please share some light on this subject, I have done lots and lots of searching with no luck on how to overcome this issue. I have tried various things like disable caching on Windows etc etc etc. Nothing helps :-( Thanks -- Regards, David Rea IT Support Ultra Trace Pty Ltd Ph: (08) 9456 0404 Fax: (08) 9456 0403 Web: http://www.ultratrace.com.au -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Issue listing hosts with SMBCLIENT
Hi, We recently upgraded from samba 2.2.8 to 3.0.2 (RH package, 3.0.2-6.E3) on a Linux (RHES3) server, and have had a few weird things start happening. I've set up samba on this machine as a local master = yes, preferred master = yes, domain master = yes, an os level of 60 (as it was set up previously), and things were working fine. After a week or so however, it started loosing browser elections to an XP Pro laptop. That issue is resolved now. However, after that happened, a number of machines on the network, also XP Pro, are no longer showing up in the 'Server' list when doing: smbclient -N -L localhost on the samba server. Using 'smbclient' to list the shares on the individual Pc's works fine. I've read a few posts saying that shares with 's in the description or name causes issues, so removed all of those. It also wouldn't list any share that was longer than 12 characters, so shortened the share names appropraitely, but 3 machines still refuse to show up. There is no firewalling between them, and they are on the same network segment and ip subnet. What areas in particular should I look into to figure out why the server isn't remembering these workstation PC's? Stuart -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] getent passwd wbinfo -u not working
HI, i had messed up with the pam.d so i did a fresh install. now after this fresh install some how getent passwd and wbinfo -u is not working. the rest of the commands kinit net ads join are ok. [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -u Error looking up domain users and getent passwd simply returns me to the prompt after listing the names of the local users and groups any know how whats going on? = Sahibzada Junaid Noor Ph # (+92) (051) 5950 940 Cell # (+92) (0333) 5223586 Qazi plaza,Third Floor,Commerical Market,Chaklala Scheme 3, Rawalpindi Islamic Republic of Pakistan __ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Win98 Network File Caching?
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 09:33:30AM +0800, David Rea wrote: Hi Guys, This is a strange one. We use Samba on a SCO UNIX Box that shares various files out. If you are on a Win98 system and copy a text document over to the local disk on win98 and then modify the file on a single line from the SCO system and then re-copy that file again to the 98 box it doesn't recognise any difference. It doesn't appear to occur with XP and Linux systems mounting the Samba shares at all. So I am assuming this is a problem with Win98? Can anyone please share some light on this subject, I have done lots and lots of searching with no luck on how to overcome this issue. I have tried various things like disable caching on Windows etc etc etc. Nothing helps :-( This is almost certainly due to oplocks on the client. To prevent this either turn off oplocks on the Samba server (oplocks = no on the share definition) or use Linux, which has a kernel that natively supports oplocks. Hmmm. As you're on a SCO system I'd definitely suggest the latter. Using a system whose author shows a predilection for suing their own customers isn't a good idea... Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Win98 Network File Caching?
Hi Jeremy, Thanks very much. I will give that a shot little later today. I am assuming that it doesn't affect any other OS client side except for 95 98 Strange. Cheers Regards, Dave This is almost certainly due to oplocks on the client. To prevent this either turn off oplocks on the Samba server (oplocks = no on the share definition) or use Linux, which has a kernel that natively supports oplocks. Hmmm. As you're on a SCO system I'd definitely suggest the latter. Using a system whose author shows a predilection for suing their own customers isn't a good idea... Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Antwort: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?
Hello, I had that problem, too. The reason therefor were bad rights on the printer. That solved the problem for us. Maybe that can helpyou. MfG Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba ldap with smbldap-tools cant join domain.
Dear Lists I have problem regarding configuring samba as domain controller with ldap authentication I use Samba-3.0.3-5 with Openldap-2.1.29 (running on Fedora Core 2). I follow guide from www.idealx.org/prj/samba/smbldap-howto.en.html, with recent smbldap-tools for RedHat RPM, Installation those packet was successfull, so did user management with smbldap-tools, i can login from another unix machine (ssh) with ldap account. But when i try to join my windows machine to new domain controller with samba Administrator account and password , workstation always complain something about Logon Failure Unknown user name or Bad Password Log form my domain controller machine is (syslog 4) : # tail -f log.smbd [2004/06/09 11:54:12, 2] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_domain_info(1344) Searching for:[((objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=SMB3))] [2004/06/09 11:54:12, 2] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open_connection(639) smbldap_open_connection: connection opened [2004/06/09 11:54:12, 3] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_connect_system(806) ldap_connect_system: succesful connection to the LDAP server [2004/06/09 11:54:12, 4] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(857) The LDAP server is succesful connected #tail -f log.(windows machine)[2004/06/09 11:54:12, 3] smbd/oplock.c:init_oplocks(1257) open_oplock ipc: pid = 2740, global_oplock_port = 1025 [2004/06/09 11:54:12, 4] lib/time.c:get_serverzone(122) Serverzone is -25200 [2004/06/09 11:54:12, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(890) Transaction 0 of length 72 [2004/06/09 11:54:12, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(208) netbios connect: name1=PDC-SMB3name2=BACKUP [2004/06/09 11:54:12, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(215) netbios connect: local=pdc-smb3 remote=backup, name type = 0 #cat /etc/samba/smb.conf # Global parameters [global] workgroup = SMB3 netbios name = PDC-SMB3 interfaces = 172.16.0.232 username map = /etc/samba/smbusers admin users= Administrator @Domain Admins server string = Samba Server %v security = user encrypt passwords = Yes min passwd length = 3 obey pam restrictions = No passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n *all*authentication*tokens*updated* passwd program = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-passwd %u ldap passwd sync = Yes log level = 4 syslog = 0 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 10 time server = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 mangling method = hash2 Dos charset = 850 Unix charset = ISO8859-1 logon script = logon.bat logon drive = H: logon home = logon path = domain logons = Yes os level = 65 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = Yes passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1/ # passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1/ ldap://slave.idealx.com; ldap admin dn = cn=Manager,dc=mragroup,dc=net ldap suffix = dc=mragroup,dc=net ldap group suffix = ou=Groups ldap user suffix = ou=Users ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers ldap idmap suffix = ou=Users #ldap ssl = start tls add user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd -m %u ldap delete dn = Yes #delete user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-userdel %u add machine script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd -w %u add group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupadd -p %g #delete group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupdel %g add user to group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -m %u %g delete user from group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -x %u %g set primary group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-usermod -g %g %u add user to group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -m %u %g --snip--- Is there something i missed ? i assumed that samba now can connect to ldap service, and i have an Adminstrator account at ldap DIT and at secret.tdb with right password why still i can join my windows machine ? i even add mahine name to DIT. Please help me, any suggest is very appriciate, and sorry for my poor english regards reza -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
svn commit: samba r1083 - branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/build/pidl
Author: tpot Date: 2004-06-08 12:33:47 + (Tue, 08 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1083 Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/build/pidl/eparser.pm branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/build/pidl/packet-dcerpc-eparser.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/build/pidl/packet-dcerpc-eparser.h branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/build/pidl/pidl.pl Log: Generate prototypes for structs and unions marked public in the idl. Delete various hacks to work around not doing this before. WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1083nolog=1
svn commit: samba-web r89 - trunk/vendors
Author: jerry Date: 2004-06-08 13:50:24 + (Tue, 08 Jun 2004) New Revision: 89 Modified: trunk/vendors/index.html Log: fixing temporatu glitch for deryck (while he's at work) WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=samba-webpath=/rev=89nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1084 - in trunk/source: client include lib locking printing rpc_server script smbd
Author: jra Date: 2004-06-08 16:14:19 + (Tue, 08 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1084 Modified: trunk/source/client/client.c trunk/source/include/local.h trunk/source/include/smb.h trunk/source/lib/time.c trunk/source/locking/locking.c trunk/source/printing/nt_printing.c trunk/source/rpc_server/srv_srvsvc_nt.c trunk/source/script/mkproto.awk trunk/source/smbd/close.c trunk/source/smbd/dir.c trunk/source/smbd/nttrans.c trunk/source/smbd/open.c trunk/source/smbd/oplock.c trunk/source/smbd/process.c trunk/source/smbd/reply.c trunk/source/smbd/trans2.c Log: Now it's had some proper user testing, merge in the deferred open fix. I'm still doing more testing, but it fixes a behaviour that we've been wrong on ever since the start of Samba. Jeremy. WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/trunk/sourcerev=1084nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1085 - in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source: client include lib locking printing rpc_server script smbd
Author: jra Date: 2004-06-08 16:14:31 + (Tue, 08 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1085 Modified: branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/client/client.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/include/local.h branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/include/smb.h branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/lib/time.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/locking/locking.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/printing/nt_printing.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/rpc_server/srv_srvsvc_nt.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/script/mkproto.awk branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/close.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/dir.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/nttrans.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/open.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/oplock.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/process.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/reply.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/trans2.c Log: Now it's had some proper user testing, merge in the deferred open fix. I'm still doing more testing, but it fixes a behaviour that we've been wrong on ever since the start of Samba. Jeremy. WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/branches/SAMBA_3_0/sourcerev=1085nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1086 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source: lib torture torture/basic
Author: jra Date: 2004-06-08 19:25:26 + (Tue, 08 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1086 Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/time.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/torture/basic/denytest.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/torture/torture.c Log: Add defer open test to check timeout on sharing violation open. This has found some signing errors in the Samba3.0 implementation of the deferred open code. Still working on these... Jeremy WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/branches/SAMBA_4_0/sourcerev=1086nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1087 - in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source: lib param
Author: jerry Date: 2004-06-08 20:10:26 + (Tue, 08 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1087 Modified: branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/lib/util_str.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/param/loadparm.c Log: BUG 1221: revert old change that used single and double quotes as delimters in next_token(), and change print_parameter() to print out parm values surrounded by double quotes (instead of single quotes) WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/branches/SAMBA_3_0/sourcerev=1087nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1088 - in trunk/source: lib param
Author: jerry Date: 2004-06-08 20:12:36 + (Tue, 08 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1088 Modified: trunk/source/lib/util_str.c trunk/source/param/loadparm.c Log: BUG 1221: revert old change that used single and double quotes as delimters in next_token(), and change print_parameter() to print out parm values surrounded by double quotes (instead of single quotes) WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/trunk/sourcerev=1088nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1089 - branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd
Author: jra Date: 2004-06-08 22:13:59 + (Tue, 08 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1089 Modified: branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/open.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/oplock.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/process.c Log: Removed spurious oplock message in deferred open processing. Fix smb signing sequence counts. Jeremy. WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1089nolog=1
svn commit: samba-web r90 - trunk
Author: sfrench Date: 2004-06-08 22:43:39 + (Tue, 08 Jun 2004) New Revision: 90 Modified: trunk/Linux_CIFS_client.html Log: Update cifs vfs web page for 1.17d WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=samba-webpath=/rev=90nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1091 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source: libcli/raw torture
Author: jra Date: 2004-06-09 00:07:59 + (Wed, 09 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1091 Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/raw/smb_signing.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/torture/torture.c Log: Added in timing tests for deferred opens. Added extra debug info to signing mistakes. Jeremy. WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/branches/SAMBA_4_0/sourcerev=1091nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1093 - branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd
Author: jra Date: 2004-06-09 00:43:43 + (Wed, 09 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1093 Modified: branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/error.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/nttrans.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/reply.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/trans2.c Log: Ensure we clear any cached errors on a deferred open call so we don't return the wrong error code on the next packet. Jeremy. WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1093nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1094 - in branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source: client lib libsmb param smbd torture wrepld
Author: jerry Date: 2004-06-09 03:25:57 + (Wed, 09 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1094 Modified: branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source/client/smbmount.c branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source/lib/popt_common.c branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source/lib/util.c branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source/libsmb/cliconnect.c branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source/param/loadparm.c branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source/smbd/server.c branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source/torture/rpctorture.c branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source/torture/vfstest.c branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source/wrepld/server.c Log: fix seg fault in smbclient cause by loadparm.c changes during merge WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/sourcerev=1094nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1095 - in branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source: . lib utils
Author: jerry Date: 2004-06-09 04:07:41 + (Wed, 09 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1095 Modified: branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source/Makefile.in branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source/lib/interface.c branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source/lib/time.c branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source/lib/util.c branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source/lib/util_sock.c branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source/lib/wins_srv.c branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/source/utils/nmblookup.c Log: more compile fixes -- working on nmblookup WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/branches/tmp/SAMBA_3_2_MERGE/sourcerev=1095nolog=1
