Re: [Samba] samba 3.0.4 : cannot join domain with w2k clients.
Some Unix systems by default dont allow $ character as valid part of user name and these special cases must be typically handled by forcing via special switch in passwd program or somewhere in /etc/... configurations files. But this is system depended. TP - Original Message - From: HM [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] samba 3.0.4 : cannot join domain with w2k clients. I'm back ;-) Thanks a lot to all of you who take some time to help me. I finally solved the problem : the add machine script option in smb.conf seems to produce invalid machine accounts (?!). workaround : disable this option in the smb.conf file and manually create both system account AND smbpasswd entry. Hope this will help. HM a écrit : Hello all. I'm trying since a few jours to get my w2k clients join my domain, managed by my samba 3.0.4 PDC, without success. I can browse the server, share files with it with my station, but i can't join the domain. When i try to, i get the following message (sorry for the poor translation) : The following error occurred while trying to join domain 'SLS' : Failed to open a session : username unknown or invalid password. I the logs, i get the following : [2004/06/25 17:57:42, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(978) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2004/06/25 17:57:42, 3] smbd/oplock.c:init_oplocks(1226) open_oplock_ipc: opening loopback UDP socket. [2004/06/25 17:57:42, 3] smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_init_kernel_oplocks(303) Linux kernel oplocks enabled [2004/06/25 17:57:42, 3] smbd/oplock.c:init_oplocks(1257) open_oplock ipc: pid = 3791, global_oplock_port = 1065 [2004/06/25 17:57:42, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(890) Transaction 0 of length 72 [2004/06/25 17:57:42, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(208) netbios connect: name1=SERVEUR name2=SLS-PHY-14 [2004/06/25 17:57:42, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(215) netbios connect: local=serveur remote=sls-phy-14, name type = 0 [2004/06/25 17:57:42, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(978) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2004/06/25 17:57:42, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(413) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer [2004/06/25 17:57:42, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(438) write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 5: ERRNO = Connection reset by peer [2004/06/25 17:57:42, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(630) Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer) [2004/06/25 17:57:42, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/06/25 17:57:42, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(568) Closing connections [2004/06/25 17:57:42, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(69) Yielding connection to [2004/06/25 17:57:42, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(611) Server exit (process_smb: send_smb failed.) Of course, the user root is correctly mapped in the username map, and the password is correctly set. Any idea ? Thanks ! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- Tato sprava bola prehladana na vyskyt virusov a nebezpecneho obsahu antivirovym systemom na serveri spolocnosti Jaga Group s.r.o. a zda sa byt cista. Info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Tato sprava bola prehladana na vyskyt virusov a nebezpecneho obsahu antivirovym systemom na serveri spolocnosti Jaga Group s.r.o. a zda sa byt cista. Info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba 3.0.4 : impossible to log in the domain after a few minutes ????
Hello again, I am little bit confused with your situation. We are using Samba as PDC, but joining some W2K station to the domain implies for us creating appropriate user profile on station which is represented by domain\user string instead of before machinename\user string. This is new profile on the machine and need to be old user profile was copied into this new one to keep Desktop and Outlook Express emails and other things of user-specific settings available to user. I am confused because you wrotte, that you can login into domain from W2K client using any of the accounts on the server. For me this implies, that you have created domain profiles for each user on each machine. And I cannot imagine, that you have do that. For profiles on machine see This computer - Properties - User profiles. Also for us seems to be better to change default profile type from roaming to local to prevent profile copying between server and client. But our users have each its own station, so this is useful. Next make debug trace of one of stations and go to deep log level. You must discover in more detail, what is the real reason of logout from domain. Let me know about your current discoveries. TP - Original Message - From: HM [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 5:46 PM Subject: [Samba] samba 3.0.4 : impossible to log in the domain after a few minutes I'm back (twice ^^). After solving my problem about joining the domain, i now meet another strange (very strange !) issue : after joining the domain, my w2k client reboots, and i log in using any of the accounts on the server. But after 10/15 minutes, it refuses logins !! If i reboot the client, I can login successfully again for a few minutes... And so on... Strange, strange, strange... I manage nearly 50 clients with samba since 4 years, and never had such a strange issue. Any idea ? Thanks in advance ! Amiably Hubert -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- Tato sprava bola prehladana na vyskyt virusov a nebezpecneho obsahu antivirovym systemom na serveri spolocnosti Jaga Group s.r.o. a zda sa byt cista. Info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Tato sprava bola prehladana na vyskyt virusov a nebezpecneho obsahu antivirovym systemom na serveri spolocnosti Jaga Group s.r.o. a zda sa byt cista. Info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: string overflow in safe_strcpy
I updated our server to 3.0.5pre1 this morning from the fc1 rpms linked by samba.org. But the errors persist, But like corey they do dissappear when mangling method = hash is rem'd out but this then makes long file names unreadable to programs that use 8.3 filenames, like some of the old compilers we use here. The errors occur at the sametime as Corey's when ever you browse a share you get an error for all the files in that directory. Is there any more info you might need to track this down? Thanks, Carl Matthews sample of my log file : Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (57 - 56) in safe_strcpy [Software Driver downloads HP Officejet g55 All-] Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: [2004/06/29 08:41:16, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(600) Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (9 - 8) in safe_strcpy [HP OF~YU.URL] Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: [2004/06/29 08:41:16, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(600) Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (97 - 96) in safe_strcpy [HP Officejet g55 All-in-One HP OfficeJet G Series] Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: [2004/06/29 08:41:16, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(600) Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (9 - 8) in safe_strcpy [28-06~LT.ZIP] Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: [2004/06/29 08:41:16, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(600) Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (20 - 19) in safe_strcpy [28-06-2004 09-56-06.zip] I updateJeremy Allison wrote: On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 12:57:53AM +0100, Carl wrote: Yeah i get this problem too, with samba 3.04 on FC1 exactly the same, string errors when browsing any share which fills up my /var/log/messages file Any one know a fix? Can you try 3.0.5pre1. This looks like a bug we've fixed w.r.t. NetBIOS names. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Accounts are getting dsiabled
Hi I have a problem with samba 3.0.5pre1. Many of my users are disabled by samba and I can't find the reason why. Here is an example of an user disbled by samba: Unix username:christ NT username: christ Account Flags:[DU ] User SID: S-1-5-21-3371203057-3264423045-2392767973-4030 Primary Group SID:S-1-5-21-3371203057-3264423045-2392767973-1213 Full Name:Lehrer Karlo Christ Home Directory: \{}\{}wilma2\{}christ\{}profile HomeDir Drive:Z: Logon Script: 0.0.0.0.bat Profile Path: \\WILMA2\profile Domain: WMS-NET Account desc: Workstations: Munged dial: Logon time: 0 Logoff time: Fre, 13 Dez 1901 21:45:51 GMT Kickoff time: Fre, 13 Dez 1901 21:45:51 GMT Password last set:Mit, 16 Jun 2004 14:31:37 GMT Password can change: Mit, 01 Jan 2003 00:00:01 GMT Password must change: Fre, 15 Jan 2027 00:00:09 GMT Last bad password : 0 Bad password count : 0 In log-files I can only find a massage the account is disabled when the user tries to login. (LogLevel 2). I also found two messages with a wrong password before. Can anybody help my why samba is disabling many of my users? Regards, Tilo -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: string overflow in safe_strcpy
Also i've just noticed the errors never occur for directorys but only for files longer than the 8.3. Which again suggests an error in the hash mangling method. Carl wrote: I updated our server to 3.0.5pre1 this morning from the fc1 rpms linked by samba.org. But the errors persist, But like corey they do dissappear when mangling method = hash is rem'd out but this then makes long file names unreadable to programs that use 8.3 filenames, like some of the old compilers we use here. The errors occur at the sametime as Corey's when ever you browse a share you get an error for all the files in that directory. Is there any more info you might need to track this down? Thanks, Carl Matthews sample of my log file : Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (57 - 56) in safe_strcpy [Software Driver downloads HP Officejet g55 All-] Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: [2004/06/29 08:41:16, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(600) Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (9 - 8) in safe_strcpy [HP OF~YU.URL] Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: [2004/06/29 08:41:16, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(600) Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (97 - 96) in safe_strcpy [HP Officejet g55 All-in-One HP OfficeJet G Series] Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: [2004/06/29 08:41:16, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(600) Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (9 - 8) in safe_strcpy [28-06~LT.ZIP] Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: [2004/06/29 08:41:16, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(600) Jun 29 08:41:16 mandrake1 nss_wins[27719]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (20 - 19) in safe_strcpy [28-06-2004 09-56-06.zip] I updateJeremy Allison wrote: On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 12:57:53AM +0100, Carl wrote: Yeah i get this problem too, with samba 3.04 on FC1 exactly the same, string errors when browsing any share which fills up my /var/log/messages file Any one know a fix? Can you try 3.0.5pre1. This looks like a bug we've fixed w.r.t. NetBIOS names. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] KERNEL CIFS Memory Leak
Am Montag, 28. Juni 2004 22:28 schrieb Jacob A. Alifrangis: mount //guide/music /mnt/tmp -t cifs -o username= Don't know much about cifs but I would try -o smbfs HTH Dan -- buddha 2.6.4-54.5-default 9:05am an 19:31, 1 Benutzer, -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] mkntpasswd
Hi! I am currently follwoing this howto: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/guide/happy.html#ch6-nss02 and i am stuck with: (..)You must compile the mkntpasswd tool and then install it into the /var/lib/samba/sbin directory, as shown here(...) Where can i get the mkntpasswd sources from? Or is there a rpm package for it? Thanks, Mario -- Sie haben neue Mails! - Die GMX Toolbar informiert Sie beim Surfen! Jetzt aktivieren unter http://www.gmx.net/info -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] net rpc join || smbpasswd
Hi ! I'm trying to join my samba3 print server to an existing NT4 domain. I'm on mdk 9.1 prosuite and samba3 rpms. I did urpmi samba3-server samba3-winbind without problem. I'm using this doc: http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/howto/FastStart.html#id2509604 when i do: net rpc join -S THE_PDC -U AN_ ADMIN i got: bash:net:command not found --- Do i have to use smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -r PDC -UAdmin_count%the_passwd ??? thanks by advance -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] last chance...joining XP to samba+ldap domain
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 04:57, abebe lsslp wrote: I have tried all I can and spent days trying XP to join my domain. I have finally come to a dead end: I don't see any logs in nmbd.log, smbd.log, xpclient.log or messages. Everything seems to work perfectly. So, it's all working perfectly, and you are complaining? Samba avoids logging messages (at the default log levels) for success. Andrew Bartlett signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] mkntpasswd
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:51:45AM +0200, Mario Ohnewald wrote: Hi! I am currently follwoing this howto: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/guide/happy.html#ch6-nss02 and i am stuck with: (..)You must compile the mkntpasswd tool and then install it into the /var/lib/samba/sbin directory, as shown here(...) Where can i get the mkntpasswd sources from? Or is there a rpm package for it? You'll get it from the source directory of smbldap-tools from Idealx. http://cvs.idealx.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/smbldap-tools/mkntpwd.tar.gz -- Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs 44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0) 1 41 35 00 76 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -http://www.easter-eggs.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] howto apply a patch to samba 3.0.4
Hi samba users, how can I apply a patch (post3.0.4) to samba 3.0.4? I got the sources samba-3.0.4-2.src.rpm and samba-3.0.4.patch and samba-3.0.4.patch.asc The patch solves an big problem I have. (no backup over network possible) I'm using fedora core 1 (i386) thanks for Your help Olaf -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Inconsistant winbind and getent results
Le lun 28/06/2004 à 19:52, Norman Zhang a écrit : Marcel de Riedmaten wrote: Le mer 23/06/2004 à 00:53, Norman Zhang a écrit : # getent passwd nzhang The last command displays nothing. Why? Last time i got that i had 2 users with the same numeric uid (this is counting local users) or, i am not quite sure, 2 users or group with the same SID. To much playing ! So i would double check stuff like that. I don't have a local user nzhang on my Linux box. I added winbind enum users/groups, but testparm seems to ignore them. Below is my conf file, could you see if I'm doing something stupid? Hi I said numeric uid, not uid. This is the number int the third column of a passwd entry. You have idmap in your config therefore your are running samba 3. What is your domaine controler ? By the way your config look good. An other way to look at the problem is to put log level = 3 or 5 and to look at the winbind log after you have done the getent. There surely will be some interesting message. Cheers -- Marcel de Riedmatten signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?= -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] mkntpasswd
Ah, On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:51:45AM +0200, Mario Ohnewald wrote: Hi! Where can i get the mkntpasswd sources from? Or is there a rpm package for it? You'll get it from the source directory of smbldap-tools from Idealx. http://cvs.idealx.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/smbldap-tools/mkntpwd.tar.gz Its called mkntpwd! :) Thanks! -- Sie haben neue Mails! - Die GMX Toolbar informiert Sie beim Surfen! Jetzt aktivieren unter http://www.gmx.net/info -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbldap-populate.pl
Hi again :) I am trying to populate my ldap database with the ./smbldap-populate.pl script now. The errors i get are: adding new entry: uid=Administrator,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz failed to add entry: objectclass: value #2 invalid per syntax at ./smbldap-populate.pl line 323, GEN1 line 6. adding new entry: uid=nobody,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz failed to add entry: objectclass: value #2 invalid per syntax at ./smbldap-populate.pl line 323, GEN1 line 7. I guess it can not add it because there is something wrong with the samba.schema. Has anyone else had that problem yet? I have already changed the spelling problem (objectClass:) sambaSAMAccount to sambaSamAccount. So that maches now. I would just like to know now why i get this sytax error with the populate script. Thanks, Mario -- Sie haben neue Mails! - Die GMX Toolbar informiert Sie beim Surfen! Jetzt aktivieren unter http://www.gmx.net/info -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] keep long printer name
hi everybody, I get a problem on keeping long printer name in samba. We have several printer on NT4. I want to migrate all of them to samba. In NT4, the printer name shows as HP LaserJet 5000 PCL6 on windows2000 and windows XP client. How can I get that shown on Samba exactly like that? I am using LPRng and samba 3.04. I can use HP5000PCL in samba share and it shows on printer share. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbldap-populate.pl
Solution: cp schema/nis.schema.default schema/nis.schema I kept messing around in the samba schema, but it was the posix one which caused the problems :) Hi again :) I am trying to populate my ldap database with the ./smbldap-populate.pl script now. The errors i get are: adding new entry: uid=Administrator,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz failed to add entry: objectclass: value #2 invalid per syntax at ./smbldap-populate.pl line 323, GEN1 line 6. adding new entry: uid=nobody,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz failed to add entry: objectclass: value #2 invalid per syntax at ./smbldap-populate.pl line 323, GEN1 line 7. I guess it can not add it because there is something wrong with the samba.schema. Has anyone else had that problem yet? I have already changed the spelling problem (objectClass:) sambaSAMAccount to sambaSamAccount. So that maches now. I would just like to know now why i get this sytax error with the populate script. Thanks, Mario -- Sie haben neue Mails! - Die GMX Toolbar informiert Sie beim Surfen! Jetzt aktivieren unter http://www.gmx.net/info -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- +++ Jetzt WLAN-Router für alle DSL-Einsteiger und Wechsler +++ GMX DSL-Powertarife zudem 3 Monate gratis* http://www.gmx.net/dsl -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] net rpc
It was net3 rpc !!! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] change in authentication behaviour after 3.0.2
Hi Jerry et al, I upgraded from 3.0.2 to the 5pre1 release and recognized that my old smb.conf file din't work out anymore: [ snip ] username map = /usr/spool/lp/etc/smbusers.map map to guest = Bad User guest ok = yes admin users = lp printer admin = lp guest account = nobody [ snip ] [my_server] /spool $ cat /usr/spool/lp/etc/smbusers.map !lp = lp nobody = * With this I try to map everyone on nobody, except the admin user 'lp'. It worked fine up till the 3.0.2 release since then the behaviour has changed and I can not login as admin anymore (lp get's mapped to nobody)... thank you for any help or hints ~christoph -- /* Christoph Beyer | Office: Building 2b / 23 *\ * DESY|Phone: 040-8998-2317* * - IT - | Fax: 040-8998-4060* \* 22603 Hamburg | http://www.desy.de */ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba 3.0.3-5 PDC - share works, domain login not
Hello List! I just set up a samba3+ldap pdc _almost_ successfully. If i log into the win2k box and i access \\123.123.123.123\user1 it asks me for my user1 passwd and i can access its home dir. But i can not log into the domain with the user1. It complains about a wrong passwd or user at the login prompt. Could it be that my machine is missing in my user databases? I did check my machine and it _should_ be added by the smb.conf script: add machine script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd.pl -w '%u' But it doesnt add it automatically, so i ran the script manually. Anyway, the debug level is set to 1, and here are some log lines: grep 14:37 /var/log/samba/* | grep -v nmbd /var/log/samba/box:[2004/06/29 14:37:31, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(201) /var/log/samba/box:[2004/06/29 14:37:31, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(201) Why does it say md4pw here? I set my passwds to md5. Does that matter? But accessing a share is no problem at all. Thanks for any hints, Mario -- +++ Jetzt WLAN-Router für alle DSL-Einsteiger und Wechsler +++ GMX DSL-Powertarife zudem 3 Monate gratis* http://www.gmx.net/dsl -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] ACLs revisited
Hi all, My appologies if this has been addressed before, but I've been searching the list archives and can only find people reporting having the problem, not a solution. I have found a solution for my own situation and I thought I'd share it in case it can help anyone else. BACKGROUND == I'm running Samba 3 on Fedora Core 2. I've kept the machine up to date with yum, at first installing Samba 3.0.3 that yum picks up, then recompiling myself using the source RPM for 3.0.4 on samba.org. The machine is setup as a PDC. All my Samba shares are in the folder /samba which is an ext3 partition mounted with rw,acl flags. FC2 comes as standard with a 2.6 kernel that supports ACLs on ext3 partitions. THE PROBLEM === Using setfacl and getfacl from the shell I was able to set and retrieve ACLs on files and folders. These changes were visible over the Samba shares. However, if I tried and make changes from a remote client I got no error messages, but the changes were not actually written to disk. The end result is that although I seemed to be able to add ACL entries, when I tried to check them afterwards they had disappeared. At first I thought it might have been something to do with the client I was using, a Windows 2000 SP4 machine, but an XP Pro SP1 machine showed the same behaviour and if I tried to set the ACLs from a shell on the server itself using smbcacls -U administrator -a ACL:DOMAIN\\username:ALLOWED/0/FULL //localhost/share a.txt I got no errors, but the change was not made. Checking afterwards with smbcacls -U administrator //localhost/share a.txt showed the permissions had not changed. THE SOLUTION This was embarrasingly simple in the end. After checking some logs I found the following line: [2004/06/29 13:05:52, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:build_sam_account(1183) build_sam_account: smbpasswd database is corrupt! username test-xp$ with uid 512 is not in unix passwd database! Luckily there were only a few test users and machines on the system at the time, so I was able to mv /etc/samba/smbpasswd /etc/samba/smbpasswd.corrupt and add the users again. Straight away it started to work. It would appear that during a test backup/restore something ended up out of sync between the smbpasswd and passwd files. If this has not solved your problem, I would recommend making sure that in smb.conf you have a line reading log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log, then try and use smbcacls from the linux machine itself to change your ACLs, then look through /var/log/samba/machine-name.log for the information. That way you'll have the minimum of irrelevant information in the logfile when you're hunting through it for clues. I hope this helps someone, Mark Lidstone IT and Network Support Administrator BMT SeaTech Ltd Grove House, Meridians Cross, 7 Ocean Way Ocean Village, Southampton. SO14 3TJ. UK Tel: +44 (0)23 8063 5122 Fax: +44 (0)23 8063 5144 E-Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: www.bmtseatech.co.uk == Confidentiality Notice and Disclaimer: The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are intended only for the use of the e-mail addressee(s) shown. If you are not that person, or one of those persons, you are not allowed to take any action based upon it or to copy it, forward, distribute or disclose the contents of it and you should please delete it from your system. BMT SeaTech Limited does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the context of this e-mail or its attachments which arise as a result of Internet transmission, nor accept liability for statements which are those of the author and not clearly made on behalf of BMT SeaTech Limited. == -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Accounts are getting dsiabled
Hmm, not shure, did you look at the eventlog from your win box ?? i had something alike, (before 304) and the win log showed that the password change was corrupt (was a bug before 304).. there might be some debug info there.. for the rest, i dunno.. - Collen Blijenberg (Montessori Lyceum Herman Jordan) Tuesday, June 29, 2004, 10:10:56 AM, you wrote: TL Hi TL I have a problem with samba 3.0.5pre1. TL Many of my users are disabled by samba TL and I can't find the reason why. TL Here is an example of an user disbled by samba: TL Unix username:christ TL NT username: christ TL Account Flags:[DU ] TL User SID: TL S-1-5-21-3371203057-3264423045-2392767973-4030 TL Primary Group SID: TL S-1-5-21-3371203057-3264423045-2392767973-1213 TL Full Name:Lehrer Karlo Christ TL Home Directory: \{}\{}wilma2\{}christ\{}profile TL HomeDir Drive:Z: TL Logon Script: 0.0.0.0.bat TL Profile Path: \\WILMA2\profile TL Domain: WMS-NET TL Account desc: TL Workstations: TL Munged dial: TL Logon time: 0 TL Logoff time: Fre, 13 Dez 1901 21:45:51 GMT TL Kickoff time: Fre, 13 Dez 1901 21:45:51 GMT TL Password last set:Mit, 16 Jun 2004 14:31:37 GMT TL Password can change: Mit, 01 Jan 2003 00:00:01 GMT TL Password must change: Fre, 15 Jan 2027 00:00:09 GMT TL Last bad password : 0 TL Bad password count : 0 TL In log-files I can only find a massage the account is disabled when the TL user tries to login. (LogLevel 2). TL I also found two messages with a wrong password before. TL Can anybody help my why samba is disabling many of my users? TL Regards, Tilo -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re[4]: [Samba] a better smbstatus for monitoring samba ?
does someone have some screen dumps or more tech info on the Novel file server tools, where he's talking about.. l8r - Collen Blijenberg (Montessori Lyceum Herman Jordan) Wednesday, June 16, 2004, 3:02:13 PM, you wrote: BR Hi, BR well I think it should be able to run in a console, just like Midnight BR Commander (so it's also usefull without X), BR it should have a menu for info about the system, like cpu BR usage, network card usage,memory, how many users are currently attached to BR the system, up time. BR A menu from which you can see that what user is attached to what share, and BR if you press enter on the user name you can see what files are currently in BR use. BR It's almost like smbstatus, only that it's a bit more organized, and is BR easier to view what is happening on the system in case someone causes BR trouble it is easier to find what user had that file open. Also it would be BR nice if in this same menu besides the username and what share that user is BR using there would be information about user logon time. BR Sincerely BR Robert B BR - Original Message - BR From: Collen Blijenberg MLHJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] BR To: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] BR Cc: samba mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] BR Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 08:50 BR Subject: Re[2]: [Samba] a better smbstatus for monitoring samba ? depends on it... what needs to be in the tool ??? what options, and all... (got a big holyday comming up, so got some time to crack!) l8r - Collen Blijenberg (Montessori Lyceum Herman Jordan) Wednesday, June 16, 2004, 3:26:43 AM, you wrote: JA On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 09:56:04PM +0200, Becskei Robert wrote: Hello, does anyone know if there is a tool in existence that can monitor samba shares like smbstatus but is much more advanced (and runs in console) , I mean a tool that BR has menues, some search options, and things sorted out nice. A Samba realtime monitor would be the best thing with lots of details and lots of options. I tried Swat, but that aint really a solution to watch who is connected to where, neither is smbstatus since when to many people are connected you can't see in realtime who is using what. And that I think is one major problem. I would like to have such a tool because I'm throwing the Novell File Server out and using a Whitebox 3.0EL instead. I wonder,...is there such a tool like Novell Monitor ... for linux ? I mean if there aint one for samba maybe another tool that is more advanced would be able to view who is connected to what ? what is their IP adress, what time did they logged on, what is the current system BR status, etc... JA No tool I know of currently. If anyone wants to write one (maybe a gui BR tool JA written in python ?) I'd be happy to integrate it into the source BR code. JA There are lots of admin options that could be added to Samba via TDB BR messaging JA to perform admin operations - we just need programmer enthusiasm to BR write such JA a tool. Anyone game ? JA Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] domain logins fail - nmbd doa
an update... On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Res wrote: Jeremy, On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Jeremy Allison wrote: Can you try this patch ? It just got applied to the SVN code. Thanks, just applied, will let you know how it goes over the next few days... Ok, been 48 hours and so far so good, no mysterious exits... Will update you again by the weekend if all still good, if not, sooner :) -- Regards, Res -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.3/4 - WINS server expires names after 2 hours
What I ended up doing, which worked for me, was make a change to nmbd_winsserver.c (samba 3.0.4) I added: if(lp_dns_proxy() (namerec-data.death_time != PERMANENT_TTL) (namerec-data.death_time p-timestamp) ((question-name_type == 0x20) || question-name_type == 0)) { DEBUG(3,(wins_process_name_query: name query for name %s is expired - doing dns lookup.\n, nmb_namestr(question) )); queue_dns_query(p, question, namerec); return; } right above: if( (namerec-data.death_time != PERMANENT_TTL) (namerec-data.death_time p-timestamp) ) { DEBUG(3,(wins_process_name_query: name query for name %s - name expired. Returning fail.\n, nmb_namestr(question) )); send_wins_name_query_response(NAM_ERR, p, namerec); return; } I realize this is not likely the correct way to do it but it did work for me and got a lot of people off my back every morning when I came into work and they couldn't resolve names :) By adding the above, the hosts in question would still expire after 2 hours but the next lookup after death would cause them to cache for another 2 hours instead of returning a fail message. I will test your patch on samba-3.0.5pre1 (if I can remember how to diff :D) and report back. Jeff Gerard - Systems Administrator Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company Office: 204-985-0517 Fax:204-947-5192 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] 28/06/2004 07:40 PM Please respond to Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Guillaume Millet [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.3/4 - WINS server expires names after 2 hours On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 04:25:52PM +0200, Guillaume Millet wrote: Hello, I had the same problem. I've found a workaround by patching the code in nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c: /*** Expires old names in all subnet namelists. **/ void expire_names(time_t t) { struct subnet_record *subrec; for( subrec = FIRST_SUBNET; subrec; subrec = NEXT_SUBNET_INCLUDING_UNICAST(subrec) ) { expire_names_on_subnet( subrec, t ); } expire_names_on_subnet( wins_server_subnet, t ); /* ADD THIS LINE FOR REMOVING EXPIRED NAME FROM WINS TABLE */ } I dont know if it's the correct things to do, but it works fine for me with my configuration (PDC+LDAP+WINS with Samba 3.0.4 on MDK 9.2) If a real Samba develloper can have a quick look to this to make a real correction for next release. Ok, I've looked at this in the current Samba 3.0.5preXX code (SVN) and here is the fix I think should work. It forced DNS and DNSFAIL names to be removed from the WINS db immediately their timeout persiod expires and not to go into the tombstoned state (where they would hang around for another day). Let me know if this fixes the problem for you. Thanks, Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba Cups Fedora Core 1 HP LaserJet 1015
Hello People!, I have this strange problem : I've got Fedora Core 1 (latest kernel, latest packages,latest samba,cups) and a HP LaserJet 1015 (using the HP LaserJet 1015 drivers that came with the updates for Fedora Core 1), I can print from windows and linux without any problems both text and graphich. But for some unknown reason to me (and this is a really big problem) I just can't print from a windows client running a dos program to the printer (I was able to print to it for some time , but one day it stopped, I did everything to cure it, even tried the printer on winxp and it worked ok) , it prints out the data (plain text) with garbage in it . It looks like it is using only 1 font and font size , and fills the empty spaces with numbers and garbage text. Pretty-please someone help me solve this , I must use this dos program, and I need to be able to print to the samba print server somehow. (by the way...what I don't understand is...that other printers on samba servers which are older are working ok.) Someone who had something like this, and was able to solve this, please help me. Thank you foreward Sincerely Robert B -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] failed domain logon
we have: samba 3.0.4 + w2k from some ws i can logon into domain, from others - not in logs i found 'authentication for user [USER] succeeded' but after all - logoff thought - causes are spnego, signing or schannel turned them off on samba and workstation all the same :( Sergey -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbpasswd !!?!
Samba utilizes the UNIX File permissions for telling Windows machines who can do what with a file. Due to this, you have a decent User and Group set of controls you can place on the files/directories that you choose to share with Samba. Without having users in the passwd file, Samba wouldn't be able to utilize those access rights. Yeah, it can be a paine, but it does a good job. If having multiple user account information to track is a pain, may I suggest converting to NIS or LDAP for user authentication? -Rob Alexander Varga wrote: please help me. Why I cannot create a user with smbpasswd without having this username in /etc/passwd??? ### bash-2.05# smbpasswd -a testaccount New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: Failed to initialise SAM_ACCOUNT for user testaccount. Failed to modify password entry for user testaccount bash-2.05# ## my global in smb.conf [global] workgroup = J9_C server string = %h server (Samba %v) dns proxy = no log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m passdb backend = tdbsam smbpasswd invalid users = root passwd program = /bin/passwd %u socket options = TCP_NODELAY I compilled my samba using ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba --with-pam --with-pam_smbpass --with-acl-support and made a solaris package. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] mandatory profiles, group policies, Samba3 PDC winxp Clients
Hello all, I've been trying to figure out what the best way of doing the group policy thing is. We are running samba 3 on slackware 9 with winxp clients. We are a school. i'm unclear on how much AD is actually supported... OU GPO all that. so i decided to go the administrative template way (used to be .pol files) I'm thinking of having the students run off of a mandatory profile. However, is it possible to make one gid (students) go to mandatory profile, while making another group (staff/faculty) use roaming profiles??? I've gotten the roaming profiles to load and unload fine... they're slow but i have not started to optimize them with the folder redirection. However, one item still completely eludes me. I also need to configure different groups in my group policy (administrators, teachers and students), but the details on how to create and implement a multiple-group group policy are not clear in my mind. This is the process according to me:(please clarify) 1.Either with the MMC or GPEdit.msc (which one???) i create a policy snap-in. 2.In there somewhere :-? i create the different groups and give them priviledges(this part i really don't understand how to do) 3.then i save the file and merge it into the registry. 4.then unload it from the registry into a ntuser.dat file. 5.i put the ntuser.dat in the netlogon as well as the default(and mandatory) profile folder. any comments or suggestions would be very much appreciated. Thank you for reading this far and giving me your time and consideration. Best regards, federico vela - Mount de Sales Academy - Macon, Georgia [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba+winbind on nt Domain
hello, I have installed in my machine with linux fedora Core 1 samba 3.XXX and when I try to make the command # net rpc join - S my PDC -U Administrator it comes the following message: [2004/06/29 11:13:17, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(249) cli_nt_setup_creds: request challenge failed Password: [2004/06/29 11:14:08, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(249) cli_nt_setup_creds: request challenge failed [2004/06/29 11:14:08, 0] utils/net_rpc_join.c:net_rpc_join_newstyle(326) Error domain join verification: NT_STATUS_INVALID_COMPUTER_NAME My PDC is NT 4.0, has configuration specifies for this? Thanks, Marcos -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] tdb lock failures
We've just gone live with a file print server, and are having major problems with Samba. When used out of hours, with all PCs switched on and connected to the domain, everything works fine. However, during the day, we have problems where users can't print to any samba-hosted printer, Access database applications (where the database is held on the server) won't work, or work briefly before experiencing data corruption. Our system log file is filling at an alarming rate with messages about tdb lock failures. Part of log file when trying to print: [2004/06/29 11:15:27, 2] lib/access.c:(329) Allowed connection from (192.0.0.123) [2004/06/29 11:15:27, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:(531) tdb(/usr/lib/samba/var/locks/printing.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 107 ltype=1 (No record locks available) [2004/06/29 11:15:27, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:(531) tdb(/usr/lib/samba/var/locks/printing.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 91 ltype=1 (No record locks available) [2004/06/29 11:15:27, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:(531) tdb(/usr/lib/samba/var/locks/printing.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 80 ltype=2 (No record locks available) [2004/06/29 11:15:27, 0] printing/printing.c:(388) print_queue_update: Failed to lock printing database Other errors on file access [2004/06/29 11:00:45, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:(531) tdb(/usr/lib/samba/var/locks/brlock.tdb): tdb_unlock: count is 0 [2004/06/29 11:00:45, 2] smbd/close.c:(229) janette closed file templat2/INVESTOR.BMP (numopen=7) [2004/06/29 11:00:45, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:(531) tdb(/usr/lib/samba/var/locks/locking.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 39 ltype=2 (No record locks available) [2004/06/29 11:00:45, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:(531) tdb(/usr/lib/samba/var/locks/locking.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 39 ltype=1 (No record locks available) [2004/06/29 11:00:45, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:(531) tdb(/usr/lib/samba/var/locks/locking.tdb): tdb_unlock: count is 0 [2004/06/29 11:00:45, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:(531) tdb(/usr/lib/samba/var/locks/brlock.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 39 ltype=2 (No record locks available) [2004/06/29 11:00:45, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:(531) tdb(/usr/lib/samba/var/locks/brlock.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 39 ltype=1 (No record locks available) [2004/06/29 11:00:45, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:(531) tdb(/usr/lib/samba/var/locks/brlock.tdb): tdb_unlock: count is 0 [2004/06/29 11:00:45, 2] smbd/close.c:(229) janette closed file Wills04/~$25.1will.jrh.doc (numopen=9) [2004/06/29 11:00:48, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:(531) tdb(/usr/lib/samba/var/locks/locking.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 65 ltype=2 (No record locks available) With the printing problem, I can log onto the domain as 'root' and successfully printing to the waterroom1 printer. Out of hours, I am able to login to my PC as 'mike', and print to the same printer which fails during the day for any user other than root. We're on UnixWare 7.1.3.Pack 3, and Samba 2.2.8a The other related (I think) problem we have is with a 40MB access database on the 'estate' share - it works for a wee while, then we get database errors and have to restore from a good copy. We've turned off Oplocks on the XP PCs, and tried various settings on the Samba share. When Oplocks are off on Samba we can't even open the application. We turned off oplocks on all shares last night (but didn't set strict locking) but this morning users couldn't open shared templates that are held on the 'templates' share, and we had problems with users being unable to open spreadsheets on the 'cashroom' share. We've turned oplocks on for all samba shares, but still have printing and database problems during the day. In the 100MB+ sys file, I've seen errors saying 'no record locks available - this can happen when using 64bit lock offsets'. I read something on the web about similar problems when the lock files are held on NFS partitions, and am wondering whether the /root partition is incompatible (I think it's vxfs). I'm also wondering about the 'lock spin count' and 'lock spin time' parameters... I've had to set up some local printers, and a couple of departments haven't been able to work for the last couple of days! David -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba + LDAP + OS X = no compilation
I'm trying to compile Samba 3.0.4 on Mac OS X Server with the following options: # ./configure --with-ldap --with-ldapsam --with-quotas (If that's somehow wrong, I'm certainly open to changing it.) The Samba package that comes with OS X apparently does not have LDAP SAM support. Anyhow, it configures just dandy, but when I compile it fails with: include/proto.h:589: syntax error, found `LDAP_CONST' include/proto.h:591: illegal function definition, found `)' /usr/include/dlfcn.h:35: warning: #warning You are using dlopen(), a legacy API. Please use the Mach-O dylib loading APIs if at all possible cpp-precomp: warning: errors during smart preprocessing, retrying in basic mode In file included from include/includes.h:891, from dynconfig.c:21: include/proto.h:589: parse error before LDAP_CONST make: *** [dynconfig.o] Error 1 (The warning about dlopen() appears a lot and can be safely ignored.) It seems to not understand the LDAP_CONST keyword. I went into the source and changed that to just good old vanilla const, and it gets further, but eventually errors out with: smbd/quotas.c:933: header file 'devnm.h' not found cpp-precomp: warning: errors during smart preprocessing, retrying in basic mode make: *** [smbd/quotas.o] Error 1 No idea about that one; I've got no file called devnm.h in my source directory. Should it be elsewhere? Has anyone here compiled Samba with LDAP on OS X? Or had this problem on another platform? Or does anyone just have some insight into the problem? Thanks! Chris St. Pierre Unix Systems Administrator Nebraska Wesleyan University -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] failed domain logon
appears to be solved think it was corrupted db i just rejoined troubled ws Thanks! Sergey Sergey V. wrote: we have: samba 3.0.4 + w2k from some ws i can logon into domain, from others - not in logs i found 'authentication for user [USER] succeeded' but after all - logoff thought - causes are spnego, signing or schannel turned them off on samba and workstation all the same :( Sergey -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: string overflow in safe_strcpy
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 09:13:05AM +0100, Carl Matthews wrote: Also i've just noticed the errors never occur for directorys but only for files longer than the 8.3. Which again suggests an error in the hash mangling method. Ok, I'll take a look at this - thanks ! Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbpasswd !!?!
Robert Adkins said: Samba utilizes the UNIX File permissions for telling Windows machines who can do what with a file. Due to this, you have a decent User and Group set of controls you can place on the files/directories that you choose to share with Samba. Without having users in the passwd file, Samba wouldn't be able to utilize those access rights. Yeah, it can be a paine, but it does a good job. If having multiple user account information to track is a pain, may I suggest converting to NIS or LDAP for user authentication? I am also trying to set up a Samba server without having to define local Unix users. Using LDAP is fine for what we want to do. From what you are saying then, will I need to also install nss_ldap in order to get the proper access control? If we weren't concerned about access control, could we just use the 'force user/group' parameters and not install nss_ldap? /dwight -- Dwight N. Tovey email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.dtovey.net/~dwight --- Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.3/4 - WINS server expires names after 2 hours
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:28:53PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok..tried this and no go... First request: [2004/06/29 10:06:07, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1485) wins_process_name_query: name query for name COMSRV600 from IP 10.111.1.111 [2004/06/29 10:06:07, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1549) wins_process_name_query: name query for name COMSRV600 not found - doing dns lookup. [2004/06/29 10:06:07, 3] nmbd/asyncdns.c:queue_dns_query(308) added DNS query for COMSRV600 [2004/06/29 10:06:07, 3] nmbd/asyncdns.c:add_dns_result(43) add_dns_result: DNS gave answer for COMSRV6 of 10.230.1.1 [2004/06/29 10:06:07, 3] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:add_name_to_subnet(236) add_name_to_subnet: Added netbios name COMSRV600 with first IP 10.230.1.1 ttl=7200 nb_flags= 4 to subnet WINS_SERVER_SUBNET 2 hours passes Request after expirey: [2004/06/29 12:07:26, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1485) wins_process_name_query: name query for name COMSRV600 from IP 10.111.1.111 [2004/06/29 12:07:26, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1531) wins_process_name_query: name query for name COMSRV600 - name expired. Returning fail. Thanks - dumb mistake of mine, sorry. Used break instead of continue so I was only expiring the first record. DOH ! I'm attaching two files, the first is the complete patch with break changed to continue and should be applied to 3.0.4 or above. The second is just the break changed to continue fix and applies to the source you're running. Sorry for the mistake. Jeremy. Index: nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c === --- nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c (revision 1287) +++ nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c (working copy) @@ -1727,11 +1727,16 @@ (namerec-data.death_time t) ) { if( namerec-data.source == SELF_NAME ) { - DEBUG( 3, ( expire_names_on_subnet: Subnet %s not expiring SELF name %s\n, + DEBUG( 3, ( initiate_wins_processing: Subnet %s not expiring SELF name %s\n, wins_server_subnet-subnet_name, nmb_namestr(namerec-name) ) ); namerec-data.death_time += 300; namerec-subnet-namelist_changed = True; continue; + } else if (namerec-data.source == DNS_NAME || namerec-data.source == DNSFAIL_NAME) { + DEBUG(3,(initiate_wins_processing: deleting timed out DNS name %s\n, + nmb_namestr(namerec-name))); + remove_name_from_namelist( wins_server_subnet, namerec ); + continue; } /* handle records, samba is the wins owner */ Index: nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c === --- nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c (revision 1298) +++ nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c (working copy) @@ -1736,7 +1736,7 @@ DEBUG(3,(initiate_wins_processing: deleting timed out DNS name %s\n, nmb_namestr(namerec-name))); remove_name_from_namelist( wins_server_subnet, namerec ); - break; + continue; } /* handle records, samba is the wins owner */ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Frustrated...Samba on linux w/xfs SLOW problem
| it starts out at a decent speed for a second, then slows and slows | and eventually stops. I then get the message The specified | network name is no longer available. | | Are you getting a lot of collisions when this happens? This sounds | suspiciously like a network problem, maybe mismatched duplex settings. | | Try FTPing or SCPing a file to the server from your Windows machine. If | that transfer is affected as well, it's a network problem, not a Samba | problem. | | I had tried scping and that does work fine. | | I tried the following test. | I created a new ext2 file system on the computer, | made it a samba share, and turned off all other | samba shares except the ext2 one. I then wrote | a 35M file from my windows machine to the linux | server. It worked like it used to. | | This seems to prove to me that | a) there is no network problem, | b) samba is working correctly, | c) there is DEFINATELY an issue with XFS and samba. | From what I've read in some other places, | it appears there is also an issue with ReiserFS and samba. | | What is it with samba that it only appears to like ext2/3 fs's? | Is *ANYONE* using XFS with samba and having it work | at a normal rate of speed when writing to it? | | Before anyone asks, I also did try mounting a drive | from my windows machine via smbclient and copy | a file on the linux box from the windows machine. | That works fine, even to the xfs drives. | | It seems to me that there's got to be some option | in the samba configuration that I just don't | have correct. If someone is currently successfully | using linux xfs w/samba, please, share your config! Your mileage may vary. There is nothing about samba to prefer one fs over another. There are too many variables involved, hardware, software, configuration. I had myself some problems with ext3 and reiserfs in connection with sata drivers in kernel 2.4.20. With the same hardware and drivers xfs made a much better impression in writing speed so I set up an array of 6 disks in raid5 configuration and formatted it as xfs with an external journal. And this is a copy transaction from a client which is connected to the server with xfs via a cheap Gigabit LAN Switch: U:\dir 26.06.2004 20:02DIR . 18.06.2004 15:08DIR .. 25.12.2003 23:44 73.515.932 pmn90g.tarlist 1 File(s) 73.515.932 Bytes 1 Dir(s), 347.053.490.176 Bytes free U:\timethis copy pmn90g.tarlist C:\Temp\pmn90g TimeThis : Elapsed Time : 00:00:01.601 U:\timethis copy C:\Temp\pmn90g TimeThis : Elapsed Time : 00:00:01.892 Which means 46 MB/s from the server to the local file and 39 MB/s from the local file back to server. Not too bad for an xfs. Nothing special in smb.conf. I'm not convinced that there is a problem between Samba and xfs. As I mentioned in a letter yesterday some problems go away after a reboot. If you have added a disk to format as ext2 then you have also rebooted your system. If there were any problems with WINS resolution due to stale cached entries they might be gone after reboot. I don't say that there can absolutely be no problems between samba and xfs, only that it is not very likely. It is difficult to see what's wrong with your setup. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Password Aging with Winbind?
Dear list, I'd like to know if anyone has a solution that allows a unix account with expired password to change the password. My problem is similar to what's described here, but it seems no one answered. http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-January/077899.html If I missed any answer or if someone came up with a solution, could it be posted here? I have samba 2.2.9 on Solaris 8. Also, according to my truss, it seems pam_unix.so.1 is the problem (new password is asked but right after pam_unix.so.1 is called, the error message is printed 3 times), but could anyone provide an insight if not an answer? ++quote++ Interaction with Password Aging When password aging is turned on, only a limited set of pos- sible name services are permitted for the passwd: database in the /etc/nsswitch.conf file: passwd: files passwd: files nis passwd: files nisplus passwd: files ldap passwd: compat passwd_compat: nisplus passwd_compat: ldap ++unquote++ Thanks. Ben Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbpasswd !!?!
Dwight Tovey wrote: Robert Adkins said: Samba utilizes the UNIX File permissions for telling Windows machines who can do what with a file. Due to this, you have a decent User and Group set of controls you can place on the files/directories that you choose to share with Samba. Without having users in the passwd file, Samba wouldn't be able to utilize those access rights. Yeah, it can be a paine, but it does a good job. If having multiple user account information to track is a pain, may I suggest converting to NIS or LDAP for user authentication? I am also trying to set up a Samba server without having to define local Unix users. Using LDAP is fine for what we want to do. From what you are saying then, will I need to also install nss_ldap in order to get the proper access control? I am unsure, I have a small installation running and haven't been sufficiently motivated to move onto LDAP or NIS at this time. Currently, I stick with seperate passwd/group and smbpasswd files. If we weren't concerned about access control, could we just use the 'force user/group' parameters and not install nss_ldap? I am unsure, that's something I haven't needed to research or implement yet. I am sorry that I was only as helpful as I was previously. -Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Logon script problem
Hello, I'm running samba 3.02 on freebsd 4.7. Client systems are WinXP Pro Srv Pk 1. Anyway, the logon script has issues, I added a pause statement to view it. It says: There are open files and/or incomplete directory searches pending on the connection to Z: The command completed successfully. Z:\NET USE H: /HOME The current directory is invalid. END. Where did Z: come from??? I never modified any path statements in the environment varibles on the XP systems. I figured it was because the novell client was installed at one time on a few systems and it had to do with that but it does the same thing on a system with fresh install of WinXP PRO. The weird thing is that with the novell client on one of the systems, if you check workstation only and login with your domain UN PW, it logs with the login script just fine. Any help would be greatly appreciated. -- Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Need some honest feedback for my project
Hey everyone. I need some feedback and suggestions on where to take a project I am working on. Reason I am asking here is that the ultimate decision will be mine when we decide, and I need to make sure I make the right decision. We are trying to decide on a solution for our company. We are currently a company of 40 employees running as a workgroup. We are going to grow to over 100 employees over the next 2 years. We would like to make the transition to a Domain setup, with the option of using a Domain controller of some sort. I know that samba can easily be setup to be a PDC with different options to hold user accounts. However, our solution will require a few more needs that we would like to be filled. First, I should say that I have worked with samba for some time now and really like it. It is my first choice anytime I need to roll out a file and print server or a PDC. It is very reliable and stable, which is why it has always been a preferred solution when I can implement it. For our current situation, we are currently considering using a Samba PDC with LDAP on the backend for or corporate network. We are also looking to open up multiple branch offices in the next 5 years (total of 20). With that in mind, it is very important that we keep data syncd between the servers at the corporate office as well as servers needed at the Branch office's. Other items that we would like to implement: -roaming profiles -high security level (for example, log on hours) -remote management ability (of servers, etc.) -ability to setup 'policies' of some sort to push out to office(s) (group this can do this, but not this for example) -option to roll out software to computers remotely, patch updates (push software out fo a branch office from the corporate office) -desktop management (not really samba thing...) -user management (obviously), management of users at branch offices, access to resources, group usage, etc. As you can see, we are trying to setup a solid infrastructure for our company and then continue to work with it as we open up branch offices in the future. I know some of the things listed above are not samba specific, but they are options we would like to implement. We are looking at two solutions right now: -samba as a PDC with LDAP -Novell, using Netware with eDirectory No Windows solution at all as we run a mix of Windows desktops and servers and UNIX/Linux servers with a few workstations. Im not much of a Windows fan and do not want to work with nor pay for Active Directory. I realize that there is quite a difference in choosing between Samba and Novell, the biggest one being cost. I realize that. That is why I am trying to gather all the information that I can before I make this decision. With what I have listed above, anyone feel like giving me their feedback on this? What they think? What they suggest? You can email the list, or me personally as I don't mind. I appreciate everyone's time and feedback on this. It is a big decision that I will need to make here soon. Thanks, Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbpasswd !!?!
Thanx ...and yes. It is realy a big trouble with lot of users. I tryed ldap, but hence my LDAP server is an Novel eDirectory, I am not realy familiar with it and couldn't find any advice on google to configurte it right(the problem I have is to use the right filters while searchyng the LDAP accounts and rights). I read about winbind. ... would it be a solution for me, or better try it once again with LDAP? I need also do manage access to directoryes with restrictions. maybe pam could do that. ... some suggestions? Robert Adkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/29/04 04:20PM Samba utilizes the UNIX File permissions for telling Windows machines who can do what with a file. Due to this, you have a decent User and Group set of controls you can place on the files/directories that you choose to share with Samba. Without having users in the passwd file, Samba wouldn't be able to utilize those access rights. Yeah, it can be a paine, but it does a good job. If having multiple user account information to track is a pain, may I suggest converting to NIS or LDAP for user authentication? -Rob Alexander Varga wrote: please help me. Why I cannot create a user with smbpasswd without having this username in /etc/passwd??? ### bash-2.05# smbpasswd -a testaccount New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: Failed to initialise SAM_ACCOUNT for user testaccount. Failed to modify password entry for user testaccount bash-2.05# ## my global in smb.conf [global] workgroup = J9_C server string = %h server (Samba %v) dns proxy = no log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m passdb backend = tdbsam smbpasswd invalid users = root passwd program = /bin/passwd %u socket options = TCP_NODELAY I compilled my samba using ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba --with-pam --with-pam_smbpass --with-acl-support and made a solaris package. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] XP Can't Join Domain
I am running Samba 3.0.2 as a PDC on a Fedora Core 1 machine using openldap as the password backend. I think I've got all the openldap stuff working. I can log in, ssh, etc. using ldap accounts. When I try to join an XP machine to the domain, I get an error on the XP machine that reads: The following error occurred attempting to join the domain TIMBERLINE: The user name could not be found. When I check the logs, it is clear that the authentication succeeded and the script to add a machine account completed successfully. So I can't figure out what is causing the error. Any help would be much appreciated! Dan Meigs My smb.conf file is as follows: #=== Global Settings = [global] log level = 3 workgroup = TIMBERLINE netbios name = RAINIER security = user encrypt passwords = yes username map = /etc/samba/smbusers add user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd.pl -a -m '%u' delete user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-userdel.pl '%u' add group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupadd.pl -p '%g' delete group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupdel.pl '%g' add user to group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod.pl -m '%g' '%u' delete user from group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod.pl -x '%g' '%u' set primary group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-usermod.pl -g '%g' '%u' add machine script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd.pl -w '%m' ldap admin dn = cn=Manager,dc=tlinenm,dc=com ldap ssl = start tls passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://rainier.tlinenm.com ldap delete dn = no ldap user suffix = ou=People ldap group suffix = ou=Groups ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers ldap suffix = dc=tlinenm,dc=com ldap filter = ((uid=%u)(objectclass=sambaSamAccount)) server string = Samba Server on Rainier hosts allow = 192.168.0. 127. printcap name = cups printing = cups log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 500 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 os level = 35 domain master = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes wins support = yes dns proxy = yes # Share Definitions == [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/netlogon guest ok = yes writable = no share modes = no [Profiles] path = /home/profiles browseable = no guest ok = yes [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no guest ok = no writable = no printable = yes [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /tmp read only = no public = yes - The smb log file is as follows (log level 2): [2004/06/29 12:35:07, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_sam_from_ldap(462) init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: root [2004/06/29 12:35:07, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_group_from_ldap(1697) init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 512 [2004/06/29 12:35:07, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(305) check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [Administrator] - [root] - [root] succeeded [2004/06/29 12:35:07, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(324) Allowed connection from (192.168.0.98) [2004/06/29 12:35:08, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(558) Closing connections [2004/06/29 12:35:09, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_sam_from_ldap(462) init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: root [2004/06/29 12:35:09, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_group_from_ldap(1697) init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 512 [2004/06/29 12:35:09, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(305) check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [Administrator] - [root] - [root] succeeded [2004/06/29 12:35:09, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(324) Allowed connection from (192.168.0.98) [2004/06/29 12:35:09, 2] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_lookup_domain(2461) Returning domain sid for domain TIMBERLINE - S-1-5-21-1936347354-1918943746-3536452940 [2004/06/29 12:35:10, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(558) Closing connections -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbpasswd !!?!
Alexander Varga wrote: Thanx ...and yes. It is realy a big trouble with lot of users. I tryed ldap, but hence my LDAP server is an Novel eDirectory, I am not realy familiar with it and couldn't find any advice on google to configurte it right(the problem I have is to use the right filters while searchyng the LDAP accounts and rights). I read about winbind. ... would it be a solution for me, or better try it once again with LDAP? I need also do manage access to directoryes with restrictions. maybe pam could do that. ... some suggestions? Unless I am mistaken, PAM is the combination passwd/group file with a seperate smbpasswd file. From what you are saying, that's not what you want. LDAP is what I would focus on and only because you seem to already have a working LDAP installation running.. If you are still in your early stages with this server (If it is a Linux Server) you could give it a reinstall, I know that during the (Expert) installation process of several different distributions you are asked what kind of authentication model you wish to use, I know that LDAP is one of the choices and it might be easier to configure that during the install then after the initial install of the OS. Believe me when I say this, I am totally lost when it comes to LDAP Authentication.and the above is just a guess. I am very far from an expert here, I am also not very familar with Winbind. I am mearly okay with a few areas of setting up Samba, nothing more. Good luck! -Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba PDC and Citrix
Currently I have Samba running happily as a PDC. I also have Citrix running on NT Terminal server that users dial into. After joining the Terminal server to the domain, dial up users get an error saying they don't have permission to dial in and are disconnected. Has anyone had any similar experiences? Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Inconsistant winbind and getent results
Marcel de Riedmatten wrote: Le lun 28/06/2004 à 19:52, Norman Zhang a écrit : # getent passwd nzhang The last command displays nothing. Why? Last time i got that i had 2 users with the same numeric uid (this is counting local users) or, i am not quite sure, 2 users or group with the same SID. To much playing ! So i would double check stuff like that. I don't have a local user nzhang on my Linux box. I added winbind enum users/groups, but testparm seems to ignore them. Below is my conf file, could you see if I'm doing something stupid? I said numeric uid, not uid. This is the number int the third column of a passwd entry. You have idmap in your config therefore your are running samba 3. What is your domaine controler ? By the way your config look good. An other way to look at the problem is to put log level = 3 or 5 and to look at the winbind log after you have done the getent. There surely will be some interesting message. Thanks. I don't have the duplicate numeric uid for nzhang. I checked wbinfo -u | user_x for users before and after nzhang. It seems nzhang is skipped. Below is a more verbose log. Do you see what the problem is? Regards, Norman [2004/06/29 12:30:26, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_interface_version(261) [ 1759]: request interface version [2004/06/29 12:30:26, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_priv_pipe_dir(297) [ 1759]: request location of privileged pipe [2004/06/29 12:30:26, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(124) [ 1759]: getpwnam nzhang [2004/06/29 12:30:26, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_fill_pwent(50) error getting user id for sid S-1-5-21-1870222080-545617551-923749875-1043 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] winbind problem, please help
My winbind is not mapping the UIDs and GIDs to the SIDs correctly. I try to connect to my Samba 3.0.2a server from a Windows XP SP1 workstation, I fill in my username and password, and it says access is denied. According to the logs it connects and disconnects right away claiming the user does not exist, although it does. I run 'wbinfo -u' and get Error looking up domain users. Can anyone tell me what is wrong, why it is not working, and how I can fix it? Wes Hobbie -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: string overflow in safe_strcpy
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 09:13:05AM +0100, Carl Matthews wrote: Also i've just noticed the errors never occur for directorys but only for files longer than the 8.3. Which again suggests an error in the hash mangling method. Here's the fix. Incorrect use of safe_strcpy (memcpy should be used instead). Jeremy. Index: smbd/mangle_hash.c === --- smbd/mangle_hash.c (revision 1298) +++ smbd/mangle_hash.c (working copy) @@ -546,8 +546,10 @@ /* Fill the new cache entry, and add it to the cache. */ s1 = (char *)(new_entry + 1); s2 = (char *)(s1[mangled_len + 1]); - safe_strcpy( s1, mangled_name, mangled_len ); - safe_strcpy( s2, raw_name, raw_len ); + memcpy( s1, mangled_name, mangled_len ); + s1[mangled_len] = '\0'; + memcpy( s2, raw_name, raw_len ); + s2[raw_len] = '\0'; ubi_cachePut( mangled_cache, i, new_entry, s1 ); } -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:43:54 -0700 Can you try with : defer sharing violations = Yes but kernel oplocks = no oplocks = yes level2 oplocks = yes Also. I'm starting to think it may be an interaction between Linux kernel oplocks and deferred opens. I just had a lockup with these values. This one hung and then gave me the error that the file couldn't be saved and was instead saved to a temporary file. I'm still running 3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1287. smbstatus is showing two locks on the temporary file: Locked files: PidDenyMode Access R/WOplock Name -- 24074 DENY_NONE 0x30089 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/bbu projection.xls Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 24074 DENY_NONE 0x60080 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/DAD28750 Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 24074 DENY_ALL 0x7019f RDWR NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/DAD28750 Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 Logging was not at level 10, so this is what I got (the hang was between 14:56:36 and 14:57:54), so I think there's nothing useful in here. [2004/06/29 14:56:36, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) callisto (10.1.1.186) connect to service cwg initially as user cwg (uid=200, gid=203) (pid 24074) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) callisto (10.1.1.186) connect to service cwg initially as user cwg (uid=200, gid=203) (pid 23708) [2004/06/29 15:00:46, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) Do you want another debug level 10 report? Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpdCs8LMJY4M.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] CUPS printers not visible, strange behaviour
Hello all, I've done this before before so I'm a bit confused, but I've upgraded from 2.2 to 3.0.4 on a debian woody box (samba 3.0.4 from backports.org). I also have cups 1.1.20 backport as well. I've set up printing using cups (should be simple right?) but no printers appear when I browse the computer from a W2k machine. rpcclient -c enumprinters gives me No printers returned.. If I turn the log level to 3 however I see in the smbd.log: adding printer service hpcolor adding printer service checks adding printer service hpps Which are the names of the three printers. If I browse to the printer with \\apollo\hpcolor it prompts me to install the printer, but then craps out saying the printer is not connected to the network. Below are the relevant portions of my smb.conf. I'm at my wit's end... [global] # Do something sensible when Samba crashes: mail the admin a backtrace panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d # wins server = 192.168.204.1 wins support = yes name resolve order = wins lmhosts hosts bcast domain master = no allow hosts = 192.168.204. 127. dns proxy = yes protocol = NT1 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 load printers = yes printing = cups printcap name = /var/run/cups/printcap printer admin = rootnt preferred master = no password server = BETA ATLAS interfaces = 192.168.204.0/255.255.255.0 domain logons = no security = domain server string = File+Print workgroup = PRIMONICS local master = no debug timestamp = no log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log # netbios name = dc0fp1 # netbios aliases = apollo dc0fp1 netbios name = apollo os level = 31 public = yes default = homes encrypt passwords = true passdb backend = tdbsam guest message command = csh -c xedit %s;rm %s log level = 3 dead time = 15 getwd cache = yes oplocks = no level2 oplocks = no browseable = no map to guest = Bad User # for printing [printers] comment = All Printers path = /data/samba/printspool browseable = yes guest ok = yes printable = yes [print$] comment = Printer Drivers path = /data/samba/drivers browseable = yes guest ok = yes read only = yes write list = root, rootnt -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.3/4 - WINS server expires names after 2 hours
good so far...I applied the first patch to the 3.0.4 source and did my 2 hour test...the name expired and then had a successful lookup. Thanks for your help! Jeff Gerard - Systems Administrator Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company Office: 204-985-0517 Fax:204-947-5192 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/06/2004 12:22 PM Please respond to Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED], Guillaume Millet [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.3/4 - WINS server expires names after 2 hours On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:28:53PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok..tried this and no go... First request: [2004/06/29 10:06:07, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1485) wins_process_name_query: name query for name COMSRV600 from IP 10.111.1.111 [2004/06/29 10:06:07, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1549) wins_process_name_query: name query for name COMSRV600 not found - doing dns lookup. [2004/06/29 10:06:07, 3] nmbd/asyncdns.c:queue_dns_query(308) added DNS query for COMSRV600 [2004/06/29 10:06:07, 3] nmbd/asyncdns.c:add_dns_result(43) add_dns_result: DNS gave answer for COMSRV6 of 10.230.1.1 [2004/06/29 10:06:07, 3] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:add_name_to_subnet(236) add_name_to_subnet: Added netbios name COMSRV600 with first IP 10.230.1.1 ttl=7200 nb_flags= 4 to subnet WINS_SERVER_SUBNET 2 hours passes Request after expirey: [2004/06/29 12:07:26, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1485) wins_process_name_query: name query for name COMSRV600 from IP 10.111.1.111 [2004/06/29 12:07:26, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1531) wins_process_name_query: name query for name COMSRV600 - name expired. Returning fail. Thanks - dumb mistake of mine, sorry. Used break instead of continue so I was only expiring the first record. DOH ! I'm attaching two files, the first is the complete patch with break changed to continue and should be applied to 3.0.4 or above. The second is just the break changed to continue fix and applies to the source you're running. Sorry for the mistake. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] access database share with multiple users.
Did you ever figure out how to setup Access to be accessed by multiple users? Thanks, Chris Bailey -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:43:48PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:43:54 -0700 Can you try with : defer sharing violations = Yes but kernel oplocks = no oplocks = yes level2 oplocks = yes Also. I'm starting to think it may be an interaction between Linux kernel oplocks and deferred opens. I just had a lockup with these values. This one hung and then gave me the error that the file couldn't be saved and was instead saved to a temporary file. I'm still running 3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1287. smbstatus is showing two locks on the temporary file: Locked files: PidDenyMode Access R/WOplock Name -- 24074 DENY_NONE 0x30089 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/bbu projection.xls Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 24074 DENY_NONE 0x60080 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/DAD28750 Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 24074 DENY_ALL 0x7019f RDWR NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/DAD28750 Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 Logging was not at level 10, so this is what I got (the hang was between 14:56:36 and 14:57:54), so I think there's nothing useful in here. Nope, nothing there... Arh ! This is driving me nuts ! I can't reproduce it :-). A debug level 10 would be very helpful, as it's the same pid that is listed in all the (conflicting) deny modes. Which should be impossible, I just thought I'd mention that :-). I'm going to look at that code again. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] The '!' in the path names causes unpredictable results with directory listings
I filed this as a bug, but wanted to post this to the ng to check if anyone has ever seen this. I'm using samba 3.0.4. This is a somewhat weird situation, so please bear with me through the description. The following path: C:\! 01 Carte Geografiche\carte\ When read with smbclient the windows share will only show 160 files in the folder. When read on the windows machine it actually has 364. When files from this path are copied over from the windows machine to the samba shared directory (whether by windows copy or with cp from the smbmount to the samba directory), only 339 files end up copied. When the windows machine then looks at the files in the samba share only 105 files are shown. If however I do a diff several times between the smbmount of the windows share and the 339 files copied, I keep getting slightly different results. More and more files keep getting reported as missing in the smbmount of the windows share, whereas looking at the share on windows they are still there. When I got rid of ! at the start of the path, so that it was called 01 Carte Geografiche windows finally saw all 339 files in the samba share. Likewise, getting rid of the ! on the windows machine I could finally copy all 364 files without problems. I'm not sure if it is just the ! that is causing the problems. The carte directory contains a lot of it_IT and de_DE locale filenames. And some filenames are somewhat ridiculous (100-120 characters, lots of ,_-~! symbols and accents). Anyone have any ideas? Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Anyone here. . .
who can help me with an install of perl-ldap 0.31? I'm having two problems in the testing phase of the installation, one is the gpg signature appears to be broken, it dies with this error: PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl5.8.3 -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/*.t t/0-signature.gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 1 05:44:36 2004 EST using DSA key ID 06D8C374 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found == BAD/TAMPERED signature detected! == # Failed test (t/0-signature.t at line 18) # Looks like you failed 1 tests of 1. t/0-signature.dubious Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) DIED. FAILED test 1 Failed 1/1 tests, 0.00% okay Also, all of the tests that require an ldap server are skipped, even though slapd is running. What would be causing this, and how should I fix it? Here's the output from those tests: t/50populate..skipped all skipped: No server t/51searchskipped all skipped: No server t/52modifyskipped all skipped: No server t/53schemaskipped all skipped: No server t/54dse...skipped all skipped: No server t/55ssl...skipped all skipped: No server t/56ipc...skipped all skipped: No server t/57url...skipped all skipped: No server t/70sortctrl..skipped all skipped: External tests disabled And the rest of the output from the tests: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t/0-signature.t1 256 11 100.00% 1 9 tests skipped. Failed 1/15 test scripts, 93.33% okay. 1/424 subtests failed, 99.76% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK I've been working on this for quite a while and I'm fairly frustrated with it, what am I doing wrong? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Anyone here. . .
I almost forgot: This is related to samba because I'm trying to setup a samba pdc running an openldap backend and I can't add any users until I get perl-ldap installed properly as the Idealx scripts rely on this module. Alex Laughlin-Dendy wrote: who can help me with an install of perl-ldap 0.31? I'm having two problems in the testing phase of the installation, one is the gpg signature appears to be broken, it dies with this error: PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl5.8.3 -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/*.t t/0-signature.gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 1 05:44:36 2004 EST using DSA key ID 06D8C374 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found == BAD/TAMPERED signature detected! == # Failed test (t/0-signature.t at line 18) # Looks like you failed 1 tests of 1. t/0-signature.dubious Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) DIED. FAILED test 1 Failed 1/1 tests, 0.00% okay Also, all of the tests that require an ldap server are skipped, even though slapd is running. What would be causing this, and how should I fix it? Here's the output from those tests: t/50populate..skipped all skipped: No server t/51searchskipped all skipped: No server t/52modifyskipped all skipped: No server t/53schemaskipped all skipped: No server t/54dse...skipped all skipped: No server t/55ssl...skipped all skipped: No server t/56ipc...skipped all skipped: No server t/57url...skipped all skipped: No server t/70sortctrl..skipped all skipped: External tests disabled And the rest of the output from the tests: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t/0-signature.t1 256 11 100.00% 1 9 tests skipped. Failed 1/15 test scripts, 93.33% okay. 1/424 subtests failed, 99.76% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK I've been working on this for quite a while and I'm fairly frustrated with it, what am I doing wrong? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Logon scripts and Windows NT
We have Samba 2.2.5 recompiled with LDAP support running on RedHat 8 as PDC. A mixed network of Windows 98 and NT 4 clients log in using it. We have a logon script set to run for all users. It runs fine on 98 clients, but never appears to run on NT. I can access the netlogon share through Network Neighborhood on any NT box and run the script manually and it works. Below is an abbreviated copy of my smb.conf (I have removed comments and unrelated shares) and our logon script. Any recommendations on how to get this running automatically on NT clients would be greatly appreciated. smb.conf: [global] guest ok = yes log level = 0 max mux = 50 kernel oplocks = true workgroup = HOE-MAIN netbios name = RHSERVER1 server string = RH_SERVER_1 deny hosts = 192.168.10.11 192.168.10.12 allow hosts = 192.168.10. 127.0.0. printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes printing = lprng log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 2 encrypt passwords = yes unix password sync = Yes passwd program = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-passwd.pl -o %u passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *successfully* socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 remote announce = 192.168.10.255 os level = 65 domain master = True preferred master = False domain logons = yes logon script = default.bat wins support = yes dns proxy = no preserve case = yes short preserve case = YES default case = lower case sensitive = no mangle case = yes ldap suffix = dc=HOECOOP,dc=ORG ldap admin dn = cn=manager,dc=HOECOOP,dc=ORG ldap port = 389 ldap server = 127.0.0.1 ldap ssl = No add user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd.pl -w %u domain admin group = @Domain Admins time server = Yes [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /opt/samba/netlogon logon script: @ECHO off net use u: /delete net use w: /delete net use y: /delete if not %os%!==! goto nt :95 net use h: /delete net use h: \\tuxprint1\pchome net use y: \\rhserver1\dept net use w: \\rhserver1\engineer net use u: \\tuxprint1\programs goto cont :NT net use h: /delete net use h: \\tuxprint1\pchome net use y: \\rhserver1\dept /persistent:no net use w: \\rhserver1\engineer /persistent:no net use u: \\tuxprint1\programs /persistent:no goto cont :cont -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:43:48PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:43:54 -0700 Can you try with : defer sharing violations = Yes but kernel oplocks = no oplocks = yes level2 oplocks = yes Also. I'm starting to think it may be an interaction between Linux kernel oplocks and deferred opens. I just had a lockup with these values. This one hung and then gave me the error that the file couldn't be saved and was instead saved to a temporary file. I'm still running 3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1287. smbstatus is showing two locks on the temporary file: Locked files: PidDenyMode Access R/WOplock Name -- 24074 DENY_NONE 0x30089 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/bbu projection.xls Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 24074 DENY_NONE 0x60080 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/DAD28750 Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 24074 DENY_ALL 0x7019f RDWR NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/DAD28750 Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 The strange thing is the Oplock value of none here Are you sure you have kernel oplocks set to no ? Use testparm to be sure and ensure you've restarted smbd or it won't take effect. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:47:34 -0700 The strange thing is the Oplock value of none here Are you sure you have kernel oplocks set to no ? Use testparm to be sure and ensure you've restarted smbd or it won't take effect. hmmm. what does this mean: Load smb config files from /etc/samba3/smb.conf Processing section [homes] Processing section [netlogon] Processing section [profiles] Processing section [groups] Processing section [InterChk] Processing section [local-soft] Processing section [pointmeridian] Processing section [print$] Processing section [software] Processing section [lp1] Loaded services file OK. WARNING: You have some share names that are longer than 12 characters. These may not be accessible to some older clients. (Eg. Windows9x, WindowsMe, and smbclient prior to Samba 3.0.) Invalid combination of parameters for service netlogon.Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service profiles.Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service groups. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service InterChk.Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service local-soft. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service pointmeridian. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service print$. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service lp1. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions # Global parameters [global] workgroup = TRINSICS interfaces = eth0, 127.0.0.1 bind interfaces only = Yes map to guest = Bad User smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1 log level = 10 log file = /var/log/samba3/%m.log max log size = 2500 min protocol = NT1 deadtime = 1440 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE load printers = No add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g users -s /bin/false -M %u logon script = login.bat logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U logon drive = U: logon home = \\%L\%U domain logons = Yes os level = 127 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = Yes kernel oplocks = No ldap suffix = dc=trinsics,dc=com ldap machine suffix = ou=people,dc=trinsics,dc=com ldap user suffix = ou=people,dc=trinsics,dc=com ldap group suffix = ou=group,dc=trinsics,dc=com ldap admin dn = cn=wheel,o=trinsics,c=us ldap passwd sync = Yes min print space = 32768 delete veto files = Yes oplocks = No [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No veto files = /.?*/.AppleDouble/.bin/.AppleDesktop/Network Trash Folder/.Parent/Icon?/Desktop/DesktopFolderDB/Maildir/ browseable = No oplocks = Yes [netlogon] path = /home/samba/netlogon guest ok = Yes [profiles] path = /home/samba/ntprofile read only = No create mask = 0600 force create mode = 0600 directory mask = 0700 force directory mode = 0700 profile acls = Yes csc policy = disable [groups] comment = Group Shares path = /export/groups write list = @users force group = +users read only = No create mask = 0664 force create mode = 0660 directory mask = 0775 force directory mode = 0770 map acl inherit = Yes veto files = /.AppleDouble/.bin/.AppleDesktop/Network Trash Folder/.Parent/Icon?/Desktop/DesktopFolderDB/ [InterChk] comment = Sophos InterCheck Share path = /export/intercheck read only = No map acl inherit = Yes [local-soft] comment = Local Software (not backed up) path = /export/local-soft write list = @users force group = +users read only = No create mask = 0664 force create mode = 0660 directory mask = 0775 force directory mode = 0770 map acl inherit = Yes veto files = /.AppleDouble/.bin/.AppleDesktop/Network Trash Folder/.Parent/Icon?/Desktop/DesktopFolderDB/ [pointmeridian] comment = Point Meridian path = /export/pointmeridian read only = No map acl
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 05:16:24PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:47:34 -0700 The strange thing is the Oplock value of none here Are you sure you have kernel oplocks set to no ? Use testparm to be sure and ensure you've restarted smbd or it won't take effect. hmmm. what does this mean: Load smb config files from /etc/samba3/smb.conf Processing section [homes] Processing section [netlogon] Processing section [profiles] Processing section [groups] Processing section [InterChk] Processing section [local-soft] Processing section [pointmeridian] Processing section [print$] Processing section [software] Processing section [lp1] Loaded services file OK. WARNING: You have some share names that are longer than 12 characters. These may not be accessible to some older clients. (Eg. Windows9x, WindowsMe, and smbclient prior to Samba 3.0.) Invalid combination of parameters for service netlogon.Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service profiles.Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service groups. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service InterChk.Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service local-soft. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service pointmeridian. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service print$. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Invalid combination of parameters for service lp1. Level II oplocks can only be set if oplocks are also set. Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions It just means whenever you turn oplocks off and don't turn off level 2 oplocks you've got an invalid combo. Doesn't hurt. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] 2.2.9, reported name under xp
Hi, if mapping a 2.2.9 share under xp pro und choosing properties the reported name isn't correct. The name of the same share mapped on w2k is correct. Both systems have installed all available ms updates and patches. Both systems are german versions. Is this a samba are windows bug? Please take a look at http://www.eisfair.org/download/tombork/test/label.JPG smb.conf: [global] workgroup = TOMMAIK serverstring = interfaces = 127.0.0.1/8 192.168.0.6/255.255.255.0 bind interfaces only = yes security = user encrypt passwords = yes update encrypted = yes min password length = 1 password server = pam password change = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *Enter*new*UNIX*password:* %n\n *Retype*new*UNIX*password:* %n\ n *passwd:*password*updated*successfully* username map = /etc/user.map username level = 2 unix password sync = yes debug level = 0 max log size = 1000 nameresolveorder = lmhosts host bcast wins time server = yes deadtime = 60 socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE SO_RCVBUF=16384 SO_S NDBUF=16384 load printers = no mangling method = hash2 character set = iso8859-1 client code page = 850 domain admin group = root logon script = %U.bat logon drive = x: domain logons = yes add user script = /var/install/bin/samba-add-workstation %u os level = 255 preferred master = yes local master = yes domain master = yes wins support = no wins server = wins proxy = no kernel oplocks = no message command = /bin/mail -s 'message from %f on %m' root %s; rm %s dfree command = /usr/local/bin/samba-dfree admin users = root printer admin = root hosts allow = 127.0.0. 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0 printing = lprng print command = chmod 666 %s; name=`echo '%J' | sed s/^.*- //`; /usr/bin/ lpr -P%p -J$name %s; rm %s lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -P%p -L lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -P%p %j lppause command = /usr/sbin/lpc hold %p %j lpresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc release %p %j queuepause command = /usr/sbin/lpc stop %p queueresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc start %p dos filetimes = yes dos filetime resolution = yes hide files = /desktop.ini/ use sendfile = yes [netlogon] comment = netlogon-service on test2 path = /netlogon writeable = no write list = root public = no locking = no browseable = no level2 oplocks = no blocking locks = no oplocks = no hide files = /desktop.ini/Thumbs.db/ [homes] comment = home directory on %h browseable = no writeable = yes path = %H csc policy = disable valid users = %S read list = write list = create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 level2 oplocks = no blocking locks = no oplocks = no hide files = /desktop.ini/Thumbs.db/ [all] comment = complete filesystem on %h browseable = no writeable = yes path = / valid users = root read list = write list = dont descend = proc create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 level2 oplocks = no blocking locks = no oplocks = no hide files = /desktop.ini/Thumbs.db/ [public] comment = public directory on %h browseable = yes writeable = yes path = /public public = yes read list = write list = create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 level2 oplocks = no blocking locks = no oplocks = no hide files = /desktop.ini/Thumbs.db/ # cuttet printers der tom ___ WEB.DE Video-Mail - Sagen Sie mehr mit bewegten Bildern Informationen unter: http://freemail.web.de/?mc=021199 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba Problems with Authentication against a 2K3 ADS Server
Ok, here's the problem now.. I have Two unix boxes and Four Windows Servers here. The two unix boxes marvin and muse are running rhes 3 and suse 9.1 stock. Marvin uses the smbpasswd file to authenticate; I just have to sync the passwords manually. I am trying to setup muse using winbind and samba 3.0.2a The problem is that the XP machines on the network don't want to talk to muse, I get an Access Denied message of sorts preceeded by a logon request dialog. The samba/log.smbd gives this explanation: [2004/06/28 23:40:56, 0] auth/auth_util.c:make_server_info_info3(1120) make_server_info_info3: pdb_init_sam failed! Very useful; nothing on google is useful either.. Here's my smb.conf: # Global parameters [global] workgroup = BRAINDONORS realm = BRAINDONORS.NET server string = Music / CDImage Server security = ADS auth methods = winbind local master = No wins server = zaphod.braindonors.net ldap suffix = dc=braindonors,dc=net ldap ssl = no idmap uid = 1-2 idmap gid = 1-2 winbind enable local accounts = No [music-mp3] comment = MP3 Format Music Files path = /music/mp3 read only = No [music-mp3-singles] comment = Singles and One tracks path = /music/singles/mp3 veto files = /.AppleDouble/.bin/.AppleDesktop/Network Trash Folder/._* -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:43:48PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:43:54 -0700 Can you try with : defer sharing violations = Yes but kernel oplocks = no oplocks = yes level2 oplocks = yes Also. I'm starting to think it may be an interaction between Linux kernel oplocks and deferred opens. I just had a lockup with these values. This one hung and then gave me the error that the file couldn't be saved and was instead saved to a temporary file. I'm still running 3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1287. smbstatus is showing two locks on the temporary file: Ok, while I'm looking at the code, here's something that Andreas Haumer sent me about a related problem. But we did another test and we now know it has something to do with the version of MS Office: the error only occurs with (old) Excel from Office97, it does not occur with Excel from Office2003! I can't explain what is going on here, but maybe that's a hint for others having the same problem I was wondering what Excel version you're using ? Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] want to ban XP Home Edition
Just for sake of curiosity: Is that possible ? I'd like to support XP Pro *only* and to ban any other Windows OS (no 2000 server or 2003 server machines in here). Samba works in domain mode with Ldap backend. Cheers, -- Michal Kurowski perl -e '$_=q#: 13_2: 12/o{: 8_4) (_4: 6/2^-2; 3;-2^\2: 5/7\_/\7: 12m m::#; y#:#\n#;s#(\D)(\d+)#$1x$2#ge;print' -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] want to ban XP Home Edition
Just for sake of curiosity: Is that possible ? I'd like to support XP Pro *only* and to ban any other Windows OS There are some very advanced networking stacks which allow you to specify filtering based on TCP fingerprints. OpenBSD does, for example. I don't know if XP Home and XP Pro have different enough fingerprints to allow a reliable discrimination between them. This is a puzzling request, though. I am assuming that these unwanted hosts can change their ip#, thus evading firewall/smb.conf based access lists. It's easier to distinguish between XP versus 2000 versus 95, 98, Me, and NT4, etc. Those have rather different fingerprints. If you don't use OpenBSD, I suppose you could make use of nmap to perform a quick on-the-fly OS fingerprint and then pull up a firewall against that ip#, thus blocking the unwanted user(s). It seems to me that it'd be simpler to just allow access only from certain domains, etc. Malcolm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: want to ban XP Home Edition
Malcolm Baldridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are some very advanced networking stacks which allow you to specify filtering based on TCP fingerprints. OpenBSD does, for example. I don't know if XP Home and XP Pro have different enough fingerprints to allow a reliable discrimination between them. That's an interesting way to go and I think it *would* work but my original question was if it is possible for *samba* to distinguish OS releases and allow/disallow computers then. Or rather I'm sure it is possible to distuingish them but I just don't know if such config was ever implemented. Some SMB conversation option tweaking advise would be highly appreciated. Cheers, -- Michal Kurowski perl -e '$_=q#: 13_2: 12/o{: 8_4) (_4: 6/2^-2; 3;-2^\2: 5/7\_/\7: 12m m::#; y#:#\n#;s#(\D)(\d+)#$1x$2#ge;print' -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: want to ban XP Home Edition
That's an interesting way to go and I think it *would* work but my original question was if it is possible for *samba* to distinguish OS releases and allow/disallow computers then. Or rather I'm sure it is possible to distuingish them but I just don't know if such config was ever implemented. Sounds like an excellent excuse to fire up the smb-aware tcpdump tool and look at the initial exchanges between client and server. I would doubt there's an smb.conf option to let you control this, however with the source at your disposal, you can make a patch easily enough. Is your main goal to avoid weak operating systems like XP Home, or are you targetting specific users with this requirement? It's a bit unusual. =MB= -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: want to ban XP Home Edition
Malcolm Baldridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sounds like an excellent excuse to fire up the smb-aware tcpdump tool and look at the initial exchanges between client and server. I would doubt there's an smb.conf option to let you control this, however with the source at your disposal, you can make a patch easily enough. OK, I will fire up my tcpdump/tethereal ... Is your main goal to avoid weak operating systems like XP Home, or are you targetting specific users with this requirement? It's a bit unusual. I guess it is. I do not want to ban any users. I'd like to force people moving to our new XP Pro computers. Perhaps I could set it up in a way disallowing share access after a logon - only joining the domain at system log in would be allowed. Therefore no machines incapable of Samba domain logon would be banned. -- Michal Kurowski perl -e '$_=q#: 13_2: 12/o{: 8_4) (_4: 6/2^-2; 3;-2^\2: 5/7\_/\7: 12m m::#; y#:#\n#;s#(\D)(\d+)#$1x$2#ge;print' -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Microsoft Access Samba 2.0.3 - Can't open database
Hello Friends, Does anybody have the solution to the problem reported by Richard below? Is anyone else having problems using Microsoft Access97 to access database files via Samba 2.0.3? When I attempt to open the Access database from my unix account via Samba, I get the Microsoft message: Microsoft Access was unable to open the Visual Basic porject for this database. Another user is saving the project now. Do you want to retry? retrycancel There definately is no other user accessing this database. If I copy the database to my local drive, it opens and work just fine. The rest of the Samba 2.0.3 system seem to be running fine, except I do get a lot of the following messages in the log file: [1999/04/14 13:34:09, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1838) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. [1999/04/14 13:34:18, 0] smbd/password.c:setup_groups(164) Unable to initgroups. Error was Invalid argument [1999/04/14 13:34:18, 0] smbd/password.c:setup_groups(169) This is probably a problem with the account samba Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated. Thanx, Richard Hogue Regards, Hemil. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: want to ban XP Home Edition
Well remeber all...XP Prop and XP home are teh same OS. And w2k3 and XP sp2 are the same OS . Changes are made through the registry. Thus XP pro features that home doesn't have are disabled in the registry. Don't know how that would affect the actual stack. Something to think about. Oh yeah, and M$ is using the FreeBSD protocol stack anyway...only all users have root level access to it. Michal Kurowski wrote: Malcolm Baldridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are some very advanced networking stacks which allow you to specify filtering based on TCP fingerprints. OpenBSD does, for example. I don't know if XP Home and XP Pro have different enough fingerprints to allow a reliable discrimination between them. That's an interesting way to go and I think it *would* work but my original question was if it is possible for *samba* to distinguish OS releases and allow/disallow computers then. Or rather I'm sure it is possible to distuingish them but I just don't know if such config was ever implemented. Some SMB conversation option tweaking advise would be highly appreciated. Cheers, -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: want to ban XP Home Edition
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 13:11, tms3 wrote: Well remeber all...XP Prop and XP home are teh same OS. And w2k3 and XP sp2 are the same OS . Changes are made through the registry. Thus XP pro features that home doesn't have are disabled in the registry. Don't know how that would affect the actual stack. Something to think about. That's not quite true, as the utilities and the link shipped also differ. But the kernel is the same, I understand, for sanity's sake. Oh yeah, and M$ is using the FreeBSD protocol stack anyway...only all users have root level access to it. This rumour seems to have kicked around the Internet a bit, but do you have anything more than the old BSD copyright notice on ftp.exe to base it on? Certainly netcraft and nmap have no difficulty telling them apart. Andrew Bartlett signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: want to ban XP Home Edition
Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 13:11, tms3 wrote: Well remeber all...XP Prop and XP home are teh same OS. And w2k3 and XP sp2 are the same OS . Changes are made through the registry. Thus XP pro features that home doesn't have are disabled in the registry. Don't know how that would affect the actual stack. Something to think about. That's not quite true, as the utilities and the link shipped also differ. But the kernel is the same, I understand, for sanity's sake. Well no I've converted ...erm seen them convertedthey're the same Oh yeah, and M$ is using the FreeBSD protocol stack anyway...only all users have root level access to it. This rumour seems to have kicked around the Internet a bit, but do you have anything more than the old BSD copyright notice on ftp.exe to base it on? Yeah...grc.com has articles on it. Certainly netcraft and nmap have no difficulty telling them apart. Probably, and as for your use it may work..or not. Point is that the diffs are probably in the windoze registry. Andrew Bartlett -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Unable to connect machine to Active Directory Domain
Greetings, I have been trying, without success, to connect a linux host to the Active directory domain of the organisation where I work. When I use the command, net ads join -U domain.user password: domain.user.password, it does not give back a response. When I run /usr/local/samba/bin/wbinfo -t, it responds with: checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed error code was NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR (0xc0e5) Could not check secret *** This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the Department of Lands. This email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. *** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Opening Task Manager close files on samba share
I have the same problem. Did any one fix this for you? Louay -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
svn commit: samba r1291 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source: lib ntvfs ntvfs/cifs ntvfs/ipc param smb_server smbd
Author: metze Date: 2004-06-29 07:40:14 + (Tue, 29 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1291 Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/util.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/ntvfs/cifs/vfs_cifs.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/ntvfs/ipc/vfs_ipc.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/ntvfs/ntvfs_generic.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/param/loadparm.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/conn.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/connection.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/negprot.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/password.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/reply.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/request.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/search.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/service.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/session.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/sesssetup.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/signing.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/smb_server.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/smb_server.h branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/srvtime.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/trans2.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smbd/process_model.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smbd/process_model.h branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smbd/process_single.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smbd/process_standard.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smbd/process_thread.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smbd/rewrite.c Log: rename struct smbsrv_context to smbsrv_connection because this is the connection state per transport layer (tcp) connection I also moved the substructs directly into smbsrv_connection, because they don't need a struct name and we should allway pass the complete smbsrv_connection struct into functions metze WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/branches/SAMBA_4_0/sourcerev=1291nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1292 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source: auth include lib smbd
Author: abartlet Date: 2004-06-29 09:20:18 + (Tue, 29 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1292 Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/auth/auth.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/include/module.h branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/module.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smbd/process_model.c Log: Add const to the subsystem/module registration code. Add some 'multi init' code, until we get a better set of infrustructure. Andrew Bartlett WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/branches/SAMBA_4_0/sourcerev=1292nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1293 - branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server
Author: abartlet Date: 2004-06-29 09:23:37 + (Tue, 29 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1293 Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/sesssetup.c Log: Indent Andrew Bartlett WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1293nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1294 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source: auth libcli libcli/auth librpc/ndr librpc/rpc ntvfs/ipc rpc_server rpc_server/netlogon rpc_server/samr smb_server torture/rpc utils
Author: abartlet Date: 2004-06-29 09:40:10 + (Tue, 29 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1294 Removed: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/auth/auth_ntlmssp.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/rpc_server/dcesrv_crypto.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/rpc_server/dcesrv_crypto_ntlmssp.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/rpc_server/dcesrv_crypto_schannel.c Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/auth/auth.h branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/auth/auth_util.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/auth/config.m4 branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/auth/config.mk branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/gensec.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/gensec.h branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/gensec_ntlmssp.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/ntlmssp_sign.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/spnego.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/auth/spnego.h branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/config.m4 branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/ndr/ndr.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc.h branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_auth.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_ntlm.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_schannel.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/ntvfs/ipc/vfs_ipc.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/rpc_server/config.m4 branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/rpc_server/config.mk branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/rpc_server/dcerpc_server.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/rpc_server/dcerpc_server.h branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/rpc_server/dcesrv_auth.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/rpc_server/netlogon/dcerpc_netlogon.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/rpc_server/samr/samr_password.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/password.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/torture/rpc/schannel.c branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/utils/ntlm_auth.c Log: A nice, large, commit... This implements gensec for Samba's server side, and brings gensec up to the standards of a full subsystem. This means that use of the subsystem is by gensec_* functions, not function pointers in structures (this is internal). This causes changes in all the existing gensec users. Our RPC server no longer contains it's own generalised security scheme, and now calls gensec directly. Gensec has also taken over the role of auth/auth_ntlmssp.c An important part of gensec, is the output of the 'session_info' struct. This is now reference counted, so that we can correctly free it when a pipe is closed, no matter if it was inherited, or created by per-pipe authentication. The schannel code is reworked, to be in the same file for client and server. ntlm_auth is reworked to use gensec. The major problem with this code is the way it relies on subsystem auto-initialisation. The primary reason for this commit now.is to allow these problems to be looked at, and fixed. There are problems with the new code: - I've tested it with smbtorture, but currently don't have VMware and valgrind working (this I'll fix soon). - The SPNEGO code is client-only at this point. - We still do not do kerberos. Andrew Bartlett WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/branches/SAMBA_4_0/sourcerev=1294nolog=1
svn commit: samba-docs r160 - trunk/Samba-HOWTO-Collection
Author: jelmer Date: 2004-06-29 12:32:44 + (Tue, 29 Jun 2004) New Revision: 160 Modified: trunk/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/Passdb.xml Log: Fix typo WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=samba-docspath=/rev=160nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1295 - branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/printing
Author: vlendec Date: 2004-06-29 15:42:00 + (Tue, 29 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1295 Modified: branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/printing/printing.c Log: To be able to send a message to the background queue updated, we need to be root. Otherwise the USR1 signal will not be delivered. Volker WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1295nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1296 - trunk/source/printing
Author: vlendec Date: 2004-06-29 15:43:50 + (Tue, 29 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1296 Modified: trunk/source/printing/printing.c Log: To be able to send a message to the background queue updated, we need to be root. Otherwise the USR1 signal will not be delivered. Volker WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1296nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1297 - in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source: nsswitch sam
Author: vlendec Date: 2004-06-29 15:46:43 + (Tue, 29 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1297 Modified: branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/nsswitch/winbindd.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/sam/idmap.c Log: Yes, it does survive valgrind for my tests :-) Check in the 'winbind proxy only' mode -- no new parameter required :-) If you don't set idmap uid or idmap gid, winbind will not do idmap stuff, it will only proxy the netlogon request and thus speed up the authentication of domain users. Volker WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/branches/SAMBA_3_0/sourcerev=1297nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1298 - in trunk/source: nsswitch sam
Author: vlendec Date: 2004-06-29 15:48:35 + (Tue, 29 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1298 Modified: trunk/source/nsswitch/winbindd.c trunk/source/nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c trunk/source/sam/idmap.c Log: Check in the 'winbind proxy only' mode Send getusersids through a dual daemon. Volker WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/trunk/sourcerev=1298nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1300 - trunk/source/nmbd
Author: jra Date: 2004-06-29 17:33:56 + (Tue, 29 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1300 Modified: trunk/source/nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c Log: Used break instead of continue so I was only expiring the first record. DOH ! Jeremy. WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1300nolog=1
CVS update: cifsvfs/fs/cifs
Date: Tue Jun 29 19:13:02 2004 Author: sfrench Update of /home/cvs/cifsvfs/fs/cifs In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14891/fs/cifs Modified Files: AUTHORS CHANGES README cifs_debug.c cifsfs.h cifsglob.h cifspdu.h cifsproto.h cifssmb.c connect.c dir.c file.c inode.c link.c transport.c Log Message: Merge with 2.6 updates - bring to version 1.20 of cifs vfs Revisions: AUTHORS 1.8 = 1.9 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cifsvfs/fs/cifs/AUTHORS?r1=1.8r2=1.9 CHANGES 1.51 = 1.52 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cifsvfs/fs/cifs/CHANGES?r1=1.51r2=1.52 README 1.22 = 1.23 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cifsvfs/fs/cifs/README?r1=1.22r2=1.23 cifs_debug.c1.21 = 1.22 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cifsvfs/fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c?r1=1.21r2=1.22 cifsfs.h1.9 = 1.10 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cifsvfs/fs/cifs/cifsfs.h?r1=1.9r2=1.10 cifsglob.h 1.33 = 1.34 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cifsvfs/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h?r1=1.33r2=1.34 cifspdu.h 1.19 = 1.20 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cifsvfs/fs/cifs/cifspdu.h?r1=1.19r2=1.20 cifsproto.h 1.32 = 1.33 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cifsvfs/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h?r1=1.32r2=1.33 cifssmb.c 1.60 = 1.61 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cifsvfs/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c?r1=1.60r2=1.61 connect.c 1.55 = 1.56 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cifsvfs/fs/cifs/connect.c?r1=1.55r2=1.56 dir.c 1.22 = 1.23 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cifsvfs/fs/cifs/dir.c?r1=1.22r2=1.23 file.c 1.60 = 1.61 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cifsvfs/fs/cifs/file.c?r1=1.60r2=1.61 inode.c 1.40 = 1.41 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cifsvfs/fs/cifs/inode.c?r1=1.40r2=1.41 link.c 1.17 = 1.18 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cifsvfs/fs/cifs/link.c?r1=1.17r2=1.18 transport.c 1.35 = 1.36 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cifsvfs/fs/cifs/transport.c?r1=1.35r2=1.36
CVS update: cifsvfs
Date: Tue Jun 29 19:13:02 2004 Author: sfrench Update of /home/cvs/cifsvfs In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14891 Modified Files: 26to24_backporting_considerations cifs_24.patch Log Message: Merge with 2.6 updates - bring to version 1.20 of cifs vfs Revisions: 26to24_backporting_considerations 1.2 = 1.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cifsvfs/26to24_backporting_considerations?r1=1.2r2=1.3 cifs_24.patch 1.2 = 1.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cifsvfs/cifs_24.patch?r1=1.2r2=1.3
svn commit: samba r1301 - branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd
Author: jra Date: 2004-06-29 20:41:29 + (Tue, 29 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1301 Modified: branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/mangle_hash.c Log: Fix bogus error message when using mangling method = hash rather than hash2. We are already calculating lengths so just use memcpy not safe_strcpy(). Jeremy. WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1301nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1302 - trunk/source/smbd
Author: jra Date: 2004-06-29 20:41:36 + (Tue, 29 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1302 Modified: trunk/source/smbd/mangle_hash.c Log: Fix bogus error message when using mangling method = hash rather than hash2. We are already calculating lengths so just use memcpy not safe_strcpy(). Jeremy. WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1302nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1303 - trunk/source/smbd
Author: jra Date: 2004-06-30 01:34:55 + (Wed, 30 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1303 Modified: trunk/source/smbd/open.c Log: Turns out non-io opens that cause oplock breaks are a *different* set of desired access flags from those that cause sharing violations. Oplock breaks are caused by : ~(SYNCHRONIZE_ACCESS|FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES|FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES) Sharing violations are caused by : ~(SYNCHRONIZE_ACCESS|READ_CONTROL_ACCESS|FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES|FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES) We now pass the torture rename test again. I still need to work out if subsequent opens will cause sharing violations with an existing open mode of SYNCHRONIZE_ACCESS|READ_CONTROL_ACCESS|FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES|FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES; Jeremy. WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1303nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1304 - branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd
Author: jra Date: 2004-06-30 01:35:01 + (Wed, 30 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1304 Modified: branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/open.c Log: Turns out non-io opens that cause oplock breaks are a *different* set of desired access flags from those that cause sharing violations. Oplock breaks are caused by : ~(SYNCHRONIZE_ACCESS|FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES|FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES) Sharing violations are caused by : ~(SYNCHRONIZE_ACCESS|READ_CONTROL_ACCESS|FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES|FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES) We now pass the torture rename test again. I still need to work out if subsequent opens will cause sharing violations with an existing open mode of SYNCHRONIZE_ACCESS|READ_CONTROL_ACCESS|FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES|FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES; Jeremy. WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1304nolog=1
svn commit: samba r1305 - branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/utils
Author: abartlet Date: 2004-06-30 02:05:26 + (Wed, 30 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1305 Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/utils/ntlm_auth.c Log: Grrr, fix my build breakage... Declare variables at the start of a block. Andrew Bartlett WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1305nolog=1