On vr, 2006-08-04 at 08:39 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:29:39AM +0200, Sander van Harmelen wrote:
Dear Samba guru...
I have a problem when I try to remove some files on a samba share... I
see this in my samba.log:
[2006/08/04 10:58:55, 1]
Ik ben afwezig vanaf 29/07/2006 en ik ben niet eerder terug dan
23/08/2006.
Ik ben met verlof van 31 juli tot en met 22 augustus.
Voor dringende zaken kan je mailen naar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
DISCLAIMER :
De
hello,
when i do profiles NTUSER.DAT
i see this:
[$$$PROTO.HIV\Software\Policies\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\TrustedPublisher]
[$$$PROTO.HIV\Software\Policies\Microsoft\SystemCertificates]
[$$$PROTO.HIV\Software\Policies\Microsoft]
[$$$PROTO.HIV\Software\Policies]
Guido Lorenzutti wrote:
Im currently having a very long list of veto files, just to be sure that
the people ONLY can write documents and styleshets. Is there any plan to
have a reverse veto files to ONLY allow this type of file? Because
when I have a lot of veto files the samba gets too slow,
Hey guys,
Got an interesting problem for you all.
I am currently running Samba 3.0212 on a Fedora Core 5 server. I am trying to
set up the users' home directories and profile paths.
This is how I want it to work.
I have a share called Home to store all the home directories. So for example
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, mlangendoen wrote:
hello,
when i do profiles NTUSER.DAT
i see this:
[$$$PROTO.HIV\Software\Policies\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\TrustedPublisher]
[$$$PROTO.HIV\Software\Policies\Microsoft\SystemCertificates]
[$$$PROTO.HIV\Software\Policies\Microsoft]
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 04:27:58PM +0200, Michael Gasch wrote:
Guido Lorenzutti wrote:
Im currently having a very long list of veto files, just to be sure that
the people ONLY can write documents and styleshets. Is there any plan to
have a reverse veto files to ONLY allow this type of file?
On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 10:16 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 04:27:58PM +0200, Michael Gasch wrote:
Guido Lorenzutti wrote:
Im currently having a very long list of veto files, just to be sure that
the people ONLY can write documents and styleshets. Is there any plan to
Greetings,
Occasionally, when I start windows xp sp1 and try to
login to home directories on a samba 3.0.20b-3.5-SUSE
server I get the message about multiple connections,
even though net use returns nothing. Some information
that may help is that smbstatus reports a connection
to the IPC$ share
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 01:27:00PM -0400, simo wrote:
Jeremy, what about just extending the syntax of the veto files option
instead of creating a new one?
Something like if the veto files option starts with a '+' sign then the
specified files are the only one permitted instead of the only
I don't know about your specific problem, but I use the profiles of
the 3.0.7 version. All of the new releases dosen't work for me.
I was migrating 4 domains to a new domain and the profiles that comes
with 3.0.14, 3.0.21 dosen't work.
Sorry for my english, I never study :)
Bye.
mlangendoen
Hello.
When I run smbpasswd from samba 3.0.23a on a MIPSEL system running
Linux 2.4.20 as root, I'm NEVER asked for a password. Even when I
create a new user in smbpasswd, I'm not asked:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/samba# strings smbpasswd
I've read that smbfs has been depreciated for cifs for Win2k and WinXP,
however, I see that older vfat OSs such as Win98 are not supported via cifs
filesystem.
I have installed the current samba binary on Fedora Core 5 via yum and
noticed that the mount command doesn't recognize smbfs either.
I
Hello.
When I run smbpasswd from samba 3.0.23a on a MIPSEL system running
Linux 2.4.20 as root, I'm NEVER asked for a password. Even when I
create a new user in smbpasswd, I'm not asked:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/samba# strings smbpasswd
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 10:28:00 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,
Got an interesting problem for you all.
I am currently running Samba 3.0212 on a Fedora Core 5 server. I am trying to
set up the users' home directories and profile paths.
This is how I want it to work.
I have a
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 00:10:41 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new to samba and Linux. I mapped a drive from my Windows XP
workstation to the /opt directory on the Linux box. When I am in Windows
Explorer and I am viewing the samba drive, I can click on any directory or
file on that
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:05:21 -0400
Gary Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Douglas D Germann Sr wrote:
Gary Dale garydale at torfree.net writes:
I'm wondering at this point about the difference in the handling of
DNS/WINS between Win95 and WinXP. Normally, XP is the fussier of the
two,
Greetings all,
I have a bit of a problem whose answer I cannot seem to find anywhere.
I have a Fedora 5 system with about 300 users and 2 printers. Samba is
running on the sole server. There are also about 2 dozen Windows XP
computers in use, but there is no domain and no Active Directory.
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 09:12:12 +0900
FTuzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings all,
I have a bit of a problem whose answer I cannot seem to find anywhere.
I have a Fedora 5 system with about 300 users and 2 printers. Samba is
running on the sole server. There are also about 2 dozen Windows
Miguel Da Silva cibonato at fcien.edu.uy writes:
WINS is the Windows Internet Name Service - it is similar to DNS but
different enough to cause problems. Samba handles WINS differently, so
searching for WINS won't work. And I don't have anything old enough to
test from here. However,
Just one question for you all.
Am I correct in assuming that Samba file permissions are linked to Linux? As
in, I create a home directory called /home/user. The directory /home is
shared. If I set the owner of the 'user' directory to the user called 'user',
and changed the file permissions to
Author: metze
Date: 2006-08-06 16:59:29 + (Sun, 06 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 17432
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17432
Log:
display more GUID values nicely,
they all have rangeLower=16 rangeUpper=16
and attribute syntax 2.5.5.10
metze
Modified:
On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 16:59 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: metze
Date: 2006-08-06 16:59:29 + (Sun, 06 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 17432
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17432
Log:
display more GUID values nicely,
they all have
Author: idra
Date: 2006-08-06 18:05:43 + (Sun, 06 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 17433
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17433
Log:
remove obsoleted RFCs
Removed:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc1777.txt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
simo schrieb:
On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 16:59 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: metze
Date: 2006-08-06 16:59:29 + (Sun, 06 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 17432
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17432
Author: idra
Date: 2006-08-06 18:24:36 + (Sun, 06 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 17434
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17434
Log:
update our index
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/ldap_server/devdocs/Index
Changeset:
Modified:
Author: idra
Date: 2006-08-06 23:43:02 + (Sun, 06 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 17435
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17435
Log:
Have not tested against a solaris machine, but even in the case
that an OS do not support reading ntegroup informations from
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2006-08-06
00:00:20.0 +
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2006-08-07 00:00:10.0
+
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
-Build status as of Sun Aug 6 00:00:01 2006
+Build status as of Mon Aug
28 matches
Mail list logo
