Hello
-
Selon Cédric Delfosse [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Le lundi 05 février 2007 à 09:45 +0100, emmanuel musso a écrit :
Hello
When a windows xp workstation join a domain, by windows gui parameters,
ldap
machine attributes are not filled correctly:
- No attribute sambaprimarygroupsid
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:16:31AM +, - Reyneke wrote:
Can I have the logfile for the 'map username' /
'security=user' config as well?
security=share is really bad these days.
Here it is...
Can you try to put *any* password into smbpasswd with
smbpasswd -a samba
Volker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Now my next step would be to upgrade Samba to the
latest available rpm from sernet.de, which would
mean a straight upgrade from 3.04 to 3.0.23d.
Is this breaking anything?
Should I take care of something special
Can you try to put *any* password into smbpasswd with
smbpasswd -a samba
Yea, already tried that. Still having problems (although type of err seems
different).
Log extract:
[2007/02/07 01:00:36, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data()
[000] 00 5C 00 5C 00 54 00 31 00 30 00 30 00 30 00 5C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jordan Russell wrote:
In recent versions of Samba (including 3.0.24), attempting
to rename a file to a new name that differs only in
case appears to have no effect:
If it did ever work, it was a fluke. Renaming
files to different case on a
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:09:45AM +, - Reyneke wrote:
Can you try to put *any* password into smbpasswd with
smbpasswd -a samba
Yea, already tried that. Still having problems (although type of err seems
different).
Log extract:
[2007/02/07 01:00:36, 10]
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 12:15:49 -0600
From: Jordan Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Gasch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note that I am able to create new files with all-lowercase letters. I
just can't rename an existing FILE.txt to file.txt.
From what client?
MS Windows doesn't distinguish between
I set the new domains SID to the old domain SID, but are you sure that this
is enough to solve the problem? The clients still start a new profile when
the users log in. I have also restored the old servers ldap database and
when I check users attributes I see rid, sambaPrimaryGroupSID, sambaSID.
Gerald (Jerry) Carter schrieb:
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Now my next step would be to upgrade Samba to the
latest available rpm from sernet.de, which would
mean a straight upgrade from 3.04 to 3.0.23d.
Is this breaking anything?
Should I take care of something special when I do this?
I have one Windows XP box where I can print to an OKI printer that doesn't
have drivers for Linux.
I have tried to share it on Windows and print to that shared printer from a
Linux box and it seems to send the print job correctly but it doesn't print.
I checked the return value of smbspool and
Hi,
I am facing a problem with my application. It uses a windows share to
give access to a buch of dbf (I use FoxPro) files.
When I access it alone (via the share) everything runs fine but when two
users try both face a strange slowdown.
The strange part is that it used to be fast even with
Hi Jeremy,
First of all, thank you for sending us the patch!
I applied it yesterday and have been testing, it mostly works ok but let
me tell you the unexpected behavior I've found..
With Windows XP, and any other client I've ever used, it doesn't matter
which, if any, username the client
On 2/7/07, robert mena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am facing a problem with my application. It uses a windows share to
give access to a buch of dbf (I use FoxPro) files.
When I access it alone (via the share) everything runs fine but when two
users try both face a strange slowdown.
The
Hi,
we're using samba 3.0.24 on Solaris 10. Not long ago we've migrated from NIS to
LDAP with
the Solaris integrated LDAP Server/Client. Now the user mapping doesn't work
any more.
If I map the WINDOWS\Administrator account to the unix account admin (this is a
local account
on the samba
Hi all,
I configure my workstation to login in Windows AD, with kerberos+pam. I'm
trying use cups to print in one printer in a Windows Server. So, i configure
Samba (3.0.24) how member ads. But, when i try print a document (logged with
my domain user) a cups web admin say:
Unable to connect to
Hi,
This is my smb.conf file content.
[global]
workgroup = SMOKIN
# map to guest = Bad User
idmap gid = 1-2
idmap uid = 1-2
realm = SMOKIN.NET
security = ADS
usershare max shares = 100
To Whom it may Concern:
I was trying to lookup some things in the online smb.conf man page on
http://us4.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages-3/smb.conf.5.html find that
a substantial portion of it is missing. On my windows box using
Firefox, I see something like this:
EXPLANATION OF EACH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
One of our users upgraded her Windows client from Windows XP 32 Bit
to windows XP 64 bit and can not connect to any samba server in the
network since, with one exception: there is one server, running
samba-3.0.20b, which works. With other
Sukanta Ganguly wrote:
Hi,
This is my smb.conf file content.
[global]
workgroup = SMOKIN
# map to guest = Bad User
idmap gid = 1-2
idmap uid = 1-2
realm = SMOKIN.NET
security = ADS
see below
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Sukanta Ganguly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex,
This is my smb.conf file content.
[global]
workgroup = SMOKIN
# map to guest = Bad User
idmap gid = 1-2
idmap uid =
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:07:58AM -0600, Schaefer Jr, Thomas R. wrote:
Using your patch and Vista, if I'm logged into Vista as someone other
than username schaefer and go Start - Run - \\stercus\schaefer it
won't connect, even if the current Vista user's password is the same as
schaefer's
Sascha wrote:
{munch}
another question is: how can i tell samba to keep more versions of the log
files? Now it only keeps a client.log and a client.log.old.
One tack may be to write a script to rename any old files to a
datestamped file.
If you do this, you end up with
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
If it did ever work, it was a fluke. Renaming
files to different case on a caseless filesystem
(or filesystem protocol) doesn't make much sense.
Erm, why would it be a fluke? You can do this on local filesystems (as
far back as Windows 95, at least), and you can
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 05:12:32AM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jordan Russell wrote:
In recent versions of Samba (including 3.0.24), attempting
to rename a file to a new name that differs only in
case appears to have no effect:
Hi,
i have installed samba, but how can i set the guest user to root, so that it
has full acces?
and i want to add a share that points to /
because it is in my LAN, and i don't want to enter login information all the
time.
i just want to go to \\server\root and see my files
Please help me,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jordan Russell wrote:
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
If it did ever work, it was a fluke. Renaming
files to different case on a caseless filesystem
(or filesystem protocol) doesn't make much sense.
Erm, why would it be a fluke? You can do this
Keith Lynn wrote:
What are the implications of locking the ntuser.dat file on the user's
server profile? That is, if I make the ntuser.dat file read-only, what
affects will that have on the client?
The follwoing is worth what you paid for it. Maybe.
The client machine will fuss when the user
Mac wrote:
MS Windows doesn't distinguish between those two names, so it won't let
you perform the re-name as it thinks you're not changing the name.
That's actually not true; Windows-hosted filesystems allow it.
--- Test on local Windows 2000 file system ---
C:\echo . FILE.txt
C:\dir
Hi,
I've recently reinstalled our Samba server with a view to getting it
working as a PDC using the tdbsam backend. I've successfully connected a
number of XP Pro SP2 clients to the domain and can login ok, but I'm
have problems getting the clients to read/apply an NTConfig.POL file I
created
Sebastian Held wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't know the cause.
You should make sure, that Lab-119 actually uses DHCP.
Have a look at the blocked packets of the firewall and compare with Lab-101.
I had the same error domain not available, but a different scenario... I
think it was solved, by
For all interested:
Adding the following to the global config section and rejoining the domain
caused samba to fill my krb5.keytab file for me! I'm still working on some
minor issues with winbind and the ad sfu integration, but this was my big
missing item.
use kerberos keytab = Yes
Thanks
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
File a bug please. Although in ge grand scheme of things
this would be low priority to me. Maybe Jeremy feels differently.
He lives in the file serving code more than I do.
Okay, done:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4377
--
Jordan Russell
--
To
hi,
I do not know how this has happened, but 2 of my users in ldapsam have
the same sid. Can I just modify the sambasid attribute by hand or
should I delete and recreate one of the user accounts?
--
Groeten,
J.Asenjo
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 20:50 +0100, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
hi,
I do not know how this has happened, but 2 of my users in ldapsam have
the same sid. Can I just modify the sambasid attribute by hand or
should I delete and recreate one of the user accounts?
You can just change the SID, but you
Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb:
Gerald (Jerry) Carter schrieb:
STefan, I would recommend reading the WHATSNEW for
relevant changes since a lot has changes in 3 years.
This will also help bring you up to date on any
smb.conf option changes.
Umm, yes, I know this would be the thing to do.
Greetings,
My envrionment is Samba 3.0.23d as a PDC, password backend is OpenLDAP 2.3.27,
running on SuSE 10.1; workstations are Windows XP SP2, all recent patches
applied. All machines are on the same Class B private IP network. Domain
logons function perfectly, performance is very nice. For
Hi All,
I have an NT 4 domain with multiple samba servers. One of my samba
fileservers stopped allowing domain login requests. While it can enumerate
the domain users with wbinfo -u, and the domain groups with wbinfo -g,
getent passwd does not list the domain users. All the other servers in
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 09:33:35PM -0600, Jordan Russell wrote:
Server OS: Linux / Fedora Core 6
Samba version: 3.0.24, 3.0.23 (binary packages for FC6)
Samba configuration: All defaults
Client OS: Windows XP SP2, Windows 2000 SP4
In recent versions of Samba (including 3.0.24), attempting
Jeremy Allison wrote:
I've just fixed this in SVN. Turns out it was side-effect
breakage when we turned on root dfs by default. That was
a fun one - allowed me to clean up some old DFS code :-).
Excellent. Thanks!
--
Jordan Russell
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
Only time I have ever seen this was when /etc/nsswitch.conf was misconfigured,
and either didn't have winbind in the passwd and group lines, or the method
before it
was configured to [notfound return] instead of [notfound continue]
Is it possible that someone has messed with this file lately, or
I'm hoping this is an easy question, but the way my day has gone I
seriously doubt it is going to be.
Today, I installed Samba 3.0.24 with winbind support on my FreeBSD 6.2
server. I am able to join my domain and get information concerning groups
and passwords from the domain controller (Windows
On Thursday 08 February 2007 10:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be more specific I think I have made a mistake copying the libraries to
the proper location. I was not able to find libnss_winbind.so in
/usr/samba/source/nsswitch. Instead, I found nss_winbind.so. Is this the
correct file to
It seems to be the problem with upper.dat and lower.dat. I used strace and
found I missed the two files. After copy the two files, the transformation is
OK.
Thanks,
Latrell.
-Original Message-
From: Don McCall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 9:25 PM
To:
On Thursday 08 February 2007 10:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be more specific I think I have made a mistake copying the libraries
to
the proper location. I was not able to find libnss_winbind.so in
/usr/samba/source/nsswitch. Instead, I found nss_winbind.so. Is this
the
correct file
On Thursday 08 February 2007 10:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be more specific I think I have made a mistake copying the libraries
to
the proper location. I was not able to find libnss_winbind.so in
/usr/samba/source/nsswitch. Instead, I found nss_winbind.so. Is this
the
correct file
Hi Don,
Thank you very much for the help. A software engineer at my company
managed to find the solution, though I'm not quite sure why it worked out
the way it did. Thankfully, he was able to look around the should-be-fine
background of the box I had drawn in troubleshooting. Your comments
Where did you find the genent? I installed from the port but I didn't
find the genent in my FreeBSD system.
Thanks
ALex
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 01:30:36 - (GMT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 08 February 2007 10:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be more specific I think I have made a
On Thursday 08 February 2007 12:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, some things came up and I going to be here for a while.
So, I changed the debug level on winbindd to 5. Wow, there is a lot
logged!
When I use wbinfo -u or wbinfo -g, I can see a request to the DC and
information
Hi,
I don't know who can tell me.
I have three machines.
Two of Windows Server 2003
One is Samba 3
All network is connect 1G NICs.
And Switch are all Gigabyte.
When I transfer Windows to Windows.
The Speed have more then 500Mbits.
But when I transfer Windows to Samba
The speed only
I do have profiles acls = yes in the configuration.
On Saturday 03 February 2007 20:58, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Saturday 13 January 2007 02:20, Jason Martin wrote:
Hello! I am migrating an old Red Hat Samba 3.0.9 server to a new Debian
Etch Samba 3.0.23d with an OpenLDAP backend. I've got
Dear all,
I got the following situation, a share called Bureaus, with the follwong
subdirs:
/Bureaus/A
/Bureaus/B
/Bureaus/C
etc.
where A,B,C.. are the bureau names
under all the bureau names are directories:
A/Task1
A/Task2
A/Task3
A/Archive
For all the bureau names.
I've got groups, a
We already did pdbedit -i | -e
it some what worked out for us, all i like to say to this
is that i find it some what odd that a RPC VAMIRE works for NT4 server
migration
but not for samba BDC 's ??
but we succeed in migrating from 3.0.11 to 3.0.23d...
Thx and Cheers, Collen.
Felipe Augusto
I had a similiar issue recently, also on Solaris. I was running samba
3.0.14a.
The clients where Win XP but anyhow a programmer that uses a share
noticed one day that one of the timestamps of a file she was copying from
somewhere else lost its timestamp. In general though we could copy files
On Monday 05 February 2007 11:05, Papo Napolitano wrote:
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
On 02/02/2007 01:08 PM, Papo Napolitano wrote:
Any one still having problems with valid users on 3.0.23d?
I'm working in security = USER mode and with local users only.
Share configuration :
Hello,
I encountered a difficult situation in my environment where I have
only one hp-ux 10.20 left with no possibility to upgrade. I need a
pre-compiled samba version and I am not able to find it.
Off course the easiest solution would be the compilation of a older
version, but a recent failure
Greetings,
My environment is Samba 3.0.23d as a PDC, password backend is OpenLDAP
2.3.27, running on SuSE 10.1; workstations are Windows XP SP2, all
recent patches applied. All machines are on the same Class B private IP
network. Domain logons function perfectly, performance is very nice. For
Cette adresse n'existe pas sur ce serveur.
Personne ne lira votre message.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi!
I am unable to get SWAT to work. The browser (Firefox) error message is
shown in the subject of this email.
Here's what the various config files on my AIX system 4.3.3 running Samba
2.2.8.1 (downloaded from the Bull freeware site) look like :-
# cd /etc
Can I have the logfile for the 'map username' /
'security=user' config as well?
security=share is really bad these days.
Here it is...
Config used:
[global]
workgroup = PPC
netbios name = T1000
security = user
map to guest = bad password
username map = /etc/smbusers
[recdata]
comment =
Hi all:
I shared a folder in vista. In my samba (3.0.24), I create a DFS link to the
vista shared folder. However, I can’t access the share from vista.
Other OS such as XP, 2003 can access without a problem. I use two way to
connect the share:
1. map network drive: I got “network
Hello folks. I'm new to the list and I have questions about Samba. I have
been able to configure Samba 3.x on Solaris 9 with AD authentication for the
users. I'm able to mount the shares onto Windows XP clients and able to read
the files. Now, if I use a text editor like notepad or GVIM to save
Hi,
I have a problem, that occurs once a week: when my boss opens some files
with read/write access via vpn over a crappy internet connection and his
connection gets terminated, some files are still locked read-only after
several hours/half a day or more. Only restarting the appropriate smbd
On Thursday 08 February 2007 12:26, Alex Wang wrote:
Where did you find the genent? I installed from the port but I didn't
find the genent in my FreeBSD system.
It's in 6.2 (and -current)
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
The nice
Hi,
I got a question regarding samba.
can see the printer share in smbclient -L localhost but when I am trying to
access the printers in my network places is not showing up.
here is my smb.conf
# This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the
# smb.conf(5) manual
Thanks Regards
Hitesh Lad
Jr. System Administrator
Suma Soft Pvt. Ltd., Pune.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:49 AM
Subject: samba Digest, Vol 50, Issue 11
Send samba mailing list submissions to
Author: vlendec
Date: 2007-02-07 11:26:36 + (Wed, 07 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21217
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21217
Log:
Just found a system that does not define in_addr_t but only struct
in_addr. Okay, it's a SuSE 7.0, but if the fix is so
Author: vlendec
Date: 2007-02-07 12:16:23 + (Wed, 07 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21218
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21218
Log:
Fix typo
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/tdb/common/transaction.c
Author: vlendec
Date: 2007-02-07 13:26:13 + (Wed, 07 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21219
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21219
Log:
Speed up the initial startup time of smbd on systems with loaded disk
subsystems. See the comment in the diff.
Volker
Author: derrell
Date: 2007-02-07 18:31:28 + (Wed, 07 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21220
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21220
Log:
enable 'make source' (and 'make') to work properly
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/webapps/swat/Makefile
Changeset:
Author: derrell
Date: 2007-02-07 18:52:11 + (Wed, 07 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21221
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21221
Log:
'make build' should be the default target for us
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/webapps/swat/Makefile
Changeset:
Author: jelmer
Date: 2007-02-07 19:03:19 + (Wed, 07 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21222
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21222
Log:
Merge a couple of pidl fixes:
* Pidl will now warn when trying to use pointers as integers in expressions.
Author: jra
Date: 2007-02-07 19:43:44 + (Wed, 07 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21223
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21223
Log:
Try and fix bug #4361 - Vista backup fails.
Based on work from Joe Meadows [EMAIL PROTECTED].
One for the Vista patchset.
Author: sfrench
Date: 2007-02-07 20:16:02 + (Wed, 07 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21224
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21224
Log:
Initial checkin of cifs_host_name resolver helper script
(needed by /sbin keyctl utils to finish the upcall)
Added:
Author: jra
Date: 2007-02-07 20:20:56 + (Wed, 07 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21225
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21225
Log:
Couple of fixes from Martin Zielinski [EMAIL PROTECTED],
one typo, one to make sure that time initialization
is done before
Author: sfrench
Date: 2007-02-07 20:57:05 + (Wed, 07 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 1019
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-docsrev=1019
Log:
Add documentation for linux cifs client
Added:
trunk/linux-client/
trunk/linux-client/linux-cifs-client-guide.odt
Author: sfrench
Date: 2007-02-07 21:53:58 + (Wed, 07 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 1020
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-docsrev=1020
Log:
minor updates to linux client user guide
Modified:
trunk/linux-client/linux-cifs-client-guide.odt
Changeset:
Author: jra
Date: 2007-02-07 22:20:31 + (Wed, 07 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21226
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21226
Log:
Fix bug #4377 (rename of foo - Foo fails).
This is actually an interesting case as it exposed bad code in our DFS redirect
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2007-02-07
00:01:13.0 +
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2007-02-08 00:00:45.0
+
@@ -1,22 +1,22 @@
-Build status as of Wed Feb 7 00:00:02 2007
+Build status as of Thu Feb
Author: jra
Date: 2007-02-08 00:14:37 + (Thu, 08 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21227
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21227
Log:
Quick fix for Stevef - ensure the returned data on open
is 8 byte aligned.
Jeremy.
Modified:
Author: jra
Date: 2007-02-08 00:28:25 + (Thu, 08 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21228
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21228
Log:
Fix for fd leak on error path. Thanks to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for this fix !
Jeremy.
Modified:
Author: jra
Date: 2007-02-08 00:41:57 + (Thu, 08 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21229
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21229
Log:
Don't indirect through a potentially null pointer :-).
Jeremy.
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/trans2.c
Author: tridge
Date: 2007-02-08 00:58:17 + (Thu, 08 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21230
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21230
Log:
added the hooks needed in the cluster layer and the messaging code for
handling messages to remote nodes. Implemented dummy
Author: herb
Date: 2007-02-08 02:17:29 + (Thu, 08 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21231
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21231
Log:
get rid of unused defines that cause a redefined warning
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/nsswitch/wb_common.c
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:34:38PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: jelmer
Date: 2006-11-22 16:53:30 + (Wed, 22 Nov 2006)
New Revision: 19842
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=19842
Log:
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 04:37 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
Add a helpful script to do the things we need to do to make a release
tarball.
Added: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/script/mkrelease.sh
===
---
Author: tridge
Date: 2007-02-08 02:57:08 + (Thu, 08 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21232
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21232
Log:
added a raw ctdb messaging api - allowing ctdb applications to take
advantage of the ctdb messaging layer for their own
Author: tridge
Date: 2007-02-08 02:59:58 + (Thu, 08 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21233
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21233
Log:
first version of samba4 messaging using ctdb is working. This means we
should now work on a real cluster, and not just a
Author: tridge
Date: 2007-02-08 03:01:47 + (Thu, 08 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 21234
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21234
Log:
fixed a subtle bug with talloc reference counting and async ntvfs
requests.
Modified:
88 matches
Mail list logo
