I don't think that saying RTFM is the best approach... but anyway...
I already readed the manual and found the information given there
somewhat confusing at least for people who hasn't been working with
samba for a long time. I edited my smb.conf file and added the
following lines :
Hi,
i'am fighting against winbind since Samba 3.2.5
1.) Sometimes all Windows Maschines hangs couse winbind hangs.
2.) getent passwd is sometimes damned slow
Is that normal? Sometimes it needs 10 to 30 seconds to respond! Should i set
winbind cache time higher than 300?
mitarbeiter:/# wbinfo
Well,
if i open the windows explorer and go to the network and klick on a trusted
domain, it goes 5 times fast and than it needs 20 seconds to show the server
and computers. Strange?
--
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3 -
sicherer, schneller und
Hi,
I'm running a printserver with samba 3.4.0 with server side printer
drivers. That works perfect with WXP-Clients. But everytime when I want
to connect with a Windows Server 2008 or Windows Vista to my samba
printer share I get the error 0x06d1 on the Windows machine
Quoting Agustin Eguia agustin.eg...@gmail.com:
I already readed the manual and found the information given there
somewhat confusing at least for people who hasn't been working with
samba for a long time. I edited my smb.conf file and added the
following lines :
[records]
vfs objects =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have my samba deployment using an ldap backend. I made changes to the
password policy that is stored in the sambadomain object but windows
clients are not adhering to the policy. Do I need something in the
smb.conf file that enables this or
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:25:36PM +0200, Philipp Schubert wrote:
Hi,
I'm running a printserver with samba 3.4.0 with server side printer
drivers. That works perfect with WXP-Clients. But everytime when I want
to connect with a Windows Server 2008 or Windows Vista to my samba
printer share I
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:06:30AM +0200, Richard Lamboj wrote:
Hi,
i'am fighting against winbind since Samba 3.2.5
1.) Sometimes all Windows Maschines hangs couse winbind hangs.
2.) getent passwd is sometimes damned slow
Is that normal? Sometimes it needs 10 to 30 seconds to respond!
On 07/16/2009 02:55 AM, Terry wrote:
Hello,
This may not be a problem but just want to check on something. I
think I have a working config. I joined a domain successfully.
However, after configuring ssh to use winbind, it does not work until
I do a 'getent passwd'. It fails with this:
Jul 15
Initially when I posted my access problems to print$ I was using the new
registry based smb.conf I had my whole configuration in the registry. Now I
move my printers and print$ back to the text based smb.conf and I copied the
standard ubuntu debian [printers] and [print$] out of the original
Glenn,
Have you granted your user Print Operator privileges?
net rpc rights grant user SePrintOperatorPrivilege -U root
http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/NetCommand.html#id2601337
Dale
Glenn T. Arnold wrote:
Initially when I posted my access problems to print$ I
Dale,
Yes, I have the right assigned to my Domain Admins group and I just added it to
my account just encase there is a group rights problem. Here is my user id
rights.
net rpc rights list Domain\myaccount
Enter root's password:
SeMachineAccountPrivilege
SeTakeOwnershipPrivilege
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 03:11:00PM -0400, Glenn T. Arnold wrote:
Initially when I posted my access problems to print$ I was using the new
registry based smb.conf I had my whole configuration in the registry. Now I
move my printers and print$ back to the text based smb.conf and I copied the
Hello!
I've replaced the old Windows NT 4.0 server with new modern
(Core 2 DUO 2.4Ghz with 1GB RAM, SATA drives in linux software RAID 1 under
CentOS 5, Samba 3.3.0-38)
But client started to complain that the speed was slowed down. I made some
tests with old and new servers and see that
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:06:52AM +0300, Georgy Goshin wrote:
Hello!
I've replaced the old Windows NT 4.0 server with new modern
(Core 2 DUO 2.4Ghz with 1GB RAM, SATA drives in linux software RAID 1
under CentOS 5, Samba 3.3.0-38)
But client started to complain that the speed was slowed
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 05:31:21PM -0400, Glenn T. Arnold wrote:
Here is the level 10 log files I sent the first one as attachments which look
like did not make it through.
I don't see any attempts to open the print$ share in these logs.
I do see an error :
netlogon_creds_server_check:
My last install of Samba was 3.2.2 on Solaris 10 Sparc platform. Had no
problems. I'm now trying to install 3.4.0 on Solaris 10 x86 platform.
With 3.2.2 I would join our Windows domain as such:
net join -S servername -w DOMAIN_NAME -U username
All worked fine. Now with 3.4.0 I'm getting
try typing net help. From a samba 3.2.8 system the following partial
output shows
Valid targets: choose one (none defaults to localhost)
-S or --server=server server name
-I or --ipaddress=ipaddraddress of target server
-w or --workgroup=wg
John,
Thanks that was it!!
John H Terpstra - Samba Team wrote:
CJ Keist wrote:
My last install of Samba was 3.2.2 on Solaris 10 Sparc platform. Had no
problems. I'm now trying to install 3.4.0 on Solaris 10 x86 platform.
With 3.2.2 I would join our Windows domain as such:
net join -S
Hi all,
Server: Debian 5.0 with samba 3.2.5
Client: Current Mac OS X
Wanted: files with 0760, directories with 2770
Config: create mask = 760
directory mask = 770
force create mode = 760
force directory mode = 2770
Problem: files created with 644 or 764 or 600
2009/7/16 Udo Mueller deb...@cs-ol.de:
Hi all,
Server: Debian 5.0 with samba 3.2.5
Client: Current Mac OS X
Wanted: files with 0760, directories with 2770
Config: create mask = 760
directory mask = 770
force create mode = 760
force directory mode = 2770
Problem:
Can I deploy software/applications through group or domain policy with samba?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Hello all,
I have an interesting situation that I'm trying to get working. At this
point, I'm not sure if it's possible to do what I want with my
configuration. I will start by explaining my situation.
I have a primarily windows network in my organization. I also have quite
a few UNIX systems as
What Are The Effects Of Pheromones Onn uHmans?.www[dot]me15[dot]net
PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Steven Danneman schrieb:
Yes, please make sure you use torture_comment() instead of printf() and
all torture_assert* functions instead of just returning false in a
test. Then make test reports them as failures instead of errors and
it's easy to mark them as known failures. This makes sure that
The branch, master has been updated
via 1f12dc4409cc4964e708c29906fad1f81086ec01 (commit)
from c901f57ce31cb6deaf2897e12b3b14a25fe9e12f (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 3fa212af61cd334daf2b0ac6bb4c85e1db15230a (commit)
from 1f12dc4409cc4964e708c29906fad1f81086ec01 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 8cac8fd5d69f332db9e50865395d11e36639904f (commit)
via 0d9fdbceedddb08dbea8ed84e06a218d3ec562f4 (commit)
via 3c9b26276083002124674678ac757e859fb6b20e (commit)
via 47eb061b5345cccf322c165f510f54c04481d4bc (commit)
via
The branch, master has been updated
via 39684d2cbe1c8c69dc9ca5c6e05861e24091bb83 (commit)
via c9fe3256d87f4fcd119dc1a3c784f2196b4ad2fd (commit)
from 8cac8fd5d69f332db9e50865395d11e36639904f (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 98aba452fbddb9f05250a7e4dc8979990759f671 (commit)
from 39684d2cbe1c8c69dc9ca5c6e05861e24091bb83 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 4a754d029b0eb229b23980aa4a80dae2b485a302 (commit)
from 98aba452fbddb9f05250a7e4dc8979990759f671 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 74c405db406d0971ba4fe2abae4ebd950d27ab1c (commit)
from 4a754d029b0eb229b23980aa4a80dae2b485a302 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 2e77debc99299cd0defd5c00c6b618dc753905c8 (commit)
via 106d43a1ddf1a9ad9369bde17acede2a6071fb6c (commit)
via 8d68d04258d8a6e090d2eb27476532d63f741231 (commit)
via 4faef0da762fc1689ae9a3bc657fc6b5e77beb94 (commit)
via
The branch, master has been updated
via 19bc4ce95ca9b2a985313f5eb887275aa6fe3599 (commit)
via d7b31ff853ac06d5021314be698109f8487770f9 (commit)
from 2e77debc99299cd0defd5c00c6b618dc753905c8 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via f6bed79ec6f287ac5da79151b97b6cf4776aab7a (commit)
via 6cb81f7b37d541efb54bcdca46b1e0f6bc8afef9 (commit)
from 19bc4ce95ca9b2a985313f5eb887275aa6fe3599 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 7f273ee769d671d8c8be87c9187302fb77e814f3 (commit)
via 8bbd96cfbbe98f3fc19e432797cbf4478f753a0b (commit)
via 4505ea15408ad40dd8deb4041fd75a65a0ad9336 (commit)
from b75ac1185481060ab71bd743e1e48d333d716eba (commit)
The branch, master has been updated
via d4a87ee966adb9205169507fca5c07faefc4513e (commit)
via d5c20c072b464b675fbd5f37a94ae8a6ad403d49 (commit)
via 9f0bdd4e17ef5fe0b28a8ec4676d19eb4ffe6786 (commit)
from f6bed79ec6f287ac5da79151b97b6cf4776aab7a (commit)
The branch, master has been updated
via 5f295eb6f5fe60394b764a2e0bc76b77f6160664 (commit)
from d4a87ee966adb9205169507fca5c07faefc4513e (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 70603d9a79c80379bf65d9d703c399a65c109c52 (commit)
via 65e9309564611bf937ded3c74a79abff895d7c59 (commit)
via ca4982c40d81db528fe915d5ecc01fcf7df0b522 (commit)
from 7f273ee769d671d8c8be87c9187302fb77e814f3 (commit)
The branch, master has been updated
via d187eb8507f35a650ff3ffc50fa49110eebca0bd (commit)
via febf3d6d3f2bdf187c042f560aefc54b8ac72454 (commit)
via 34e6f8a04b12f8879eb42d417f9741502f0f (commit)
from 70603d9a79c80379bf65d9d703c399a65c109c52 (commit)
The annotated tag, ctdb-1.0.87 has been created
at 512bf3bafdd1715f0f879f278c67f64bfbd06a8d (tag)
tagging d187eb8507f35a650ff3ffc50fa49110eebca0bd (commit)
replaces ctdb-1.0.86
tagged by Ronnie Sahlberg
on Fri Jul 17 13:05:14 2009 +1000
- Log
41 matches
Mail list logo
