I was running 3.0.25c (I think) LDAP PDC for a couple of years and just
tried swapping in a new 3.5.4 setup. I had some problems so I wiped all
the entries and *.tdb files, and started from scratch.
Problem in a nutshell: I can't browse the domain normally, nor can I logon
to the domain. However
I tried it with smb ports 139 to no avail. Same problem.
The backup job takes that long because the windows box first runs an
integrity check. If I just copy the file manually it takes a couple of
minutes. As already mentioned the other samba server 3.4.7 works without
any problems.
What does
Hi
On 19 October 2010 01:48, Paul Bradley paul.bradley.listm...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a LOT of questions!!! This may take a while. I know some of this
stuff is at the edge of what Samba4 is just becoming able to do, so if
anyone who knows feels this is better posted on samba-technical I'd
Hi all,
This message is a testament to the great work samba team has done, but
its also an encouragement to those of you that still not sure if samba4
will work in your environment.
This semester we have moved from samba 3.0.X DC to samba4 DC for
students, and things are working great
The
Hi All,
I've been running a Samba 3.4.0 on Ubuntu 9.10 for over a year at a
friend's office and it has been extremely stable. But I've suddenly hit a
scenario where Windows 7 clients can no longer properly sync the main
share as 'Offline Files'
I found it highly unreliable under Vista
Hi All,
I've been running a Samba 3.4.0 on Ubuntu 9.10 for over a year at a
friend's office and it has been extremely stable. But I've suddenly hit a
scenario where Windows 7 clients can no longer properly sync the main
share as 'Offline Files'
I found it highly unreliable under Vista
I have a cifs-mount on an ubuntu 10.04 client which do not show all files.
On other machines I can see all 58,000 files in a folder but on this
special machine I see only 122 files.
The server is an brave old smbd Version 3.0.20b-3.5-SUSE serving a
big network since years without anny troubles.
Jeremy did you get a chance to look at this . can you please pass your comments
on this.?
Thanks
Suresh
-Original Message-
From: Volker Lendecke [mailto:volker.lende...@sernet.de]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 1:16 PM
To: Kandukuru, Suresh
Cc: j...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba]
The following may help explain the error:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Myths
So if you copy the file it is OK, but if the backup job runs an
integrity check first it fails? What is involved in the integrity
check? Is it somehow opening a connection to the server before starting
Is your samba server also a WINS server? That may help browsing issues.
Do you have smb ports defined in smb.conf?
The default is
smb ports = 445 139
I found if I set
smb ports = 139
some clients would have trouble locating shares or authenticating to
servers.
wiki.samba.org should
Greetings,
I was able to get 3.4.9 to build on my Solaris 10 boxes - but nothing
later. I've been building my own samba from source for far longer than
I care to admit (because I should know more about samba by now than I
do.) I've never had so many problems building the source has I have
Greetings,
Just for completeness I am seeing the same problem building Samba 3.5.6
under Solaris 10:
Had to manually add -lintl to the LIBS option in the Makefile.
...
Linking shared library bin/pam_winbind.so
Undefined first referenced
symbol
Hello,
First and foremost, thanks *very* much for ctdb. It's a joy to use
after banging around with other HA solutions. We're planning to use
it to export Samba and NFS shares throughout campus.
I'm having one problem with the NFS part though. When ctdbd first
starts statd (we're using
Folks,
Having some fun with winbind on Samba 3.5.5 on RHEL5 and/or Centos5.
I’ve got it working so ssh logins work correctly and file permissions
are seemingly correct with created files etc. Backend authentication
is from a Win2K3R2 box running RFC2372 extensions (ie not SFU) and all
UIDs etc
Hi,
Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:12:16AM +0100, Lukasz Zalewski napsal(a):
This message is a testament to the great work samba team has done, but
its also an encouragement to those of you that still not sure if samba4
will work in your environment.
it's nice to know it. How you cooperate with
On 10/19/2010 03:53 PM, Ludek Finstrle wrote:
Hi Ludek,
Hi,
Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:12:16AM +0100, Lukasz Zalewski napsal(a):
This message is a testament to the great work samba team has done, but
its also an encouragement to those of you that still not sure if samba4
will work in your
On 10/19/2010 9:47 AM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
Is your samba server also a WINS server? That may help browsing issues.
The nodes don't have any problems finding or communicating with the
server, the server just does not want to provide data. I have three
distinct networks that are
On 10/19/2010 12:45 PM, Eric A. Hall wrote:
Both responses show STATUS_SUCCESS in the SMB message. The only potential
difference that I can see between them is that the Samba response shows
Security signatures are not supported in the reply message. Perhaps this
is preventing the client from
Maybe I missed it- but do you have problems if the client and server
are on the same network segment?
Are all the local WINS servers samba servers or something else?
On 10/19/2010 12:45 PM, Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 10/19/2010 9:47 AM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
Is your samba server also a
I'm working on a project which requires a highly-available Samba service
in a hurry.
We multiple (3) servers with access to SAN storage using Oracle OCFS2
(clustered filesystem, allows each of the 3 nodes to simultaneously access
to the same SAN disk). We need to somehow provide Windows
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:34 PM, john_deli...@ceridian.ca wrote:
We multiple (3) servers with access to SAN storage using Oracle OCFS2
(clustered filesystem, allows each of the 3 nodes to simultaneously access
to the same SAN disk). We need to somehow provide Windows clients with
access to
I wasn't sure DFS was a good fit, my understanding of DFS is limited
(reading up today..).
From what I've read it seems I'd need to host the DFS root on a
highly-available server, and have links from there to my three single
hosts (all with shared SAN access). Unfortunately, I only have
Hello,
I built a home network storage using a dedicated computer running a Debian
distro with Samba.
Since I don't need it always up, I activated the sleep mode feature on
Debian.
My problem is that this computer is going to sleep mode, even if Samba is
connected.
Does anybody here have an idea
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 08:54:38PM +0200, Olivier Arnaud wrote:
I built a home network storage using a dedicated computer running a Debian
distro with Samba.
Since I don't need it always up, I activated the sleep mode feature on
Debian.
My problem is that this computer is going to sleep mode,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The last cifs-utils release (4.6) was on July 30th, so it's probably a
good time to go ahead and release a new one with kernel 2.6.36 shipping
soon. Major highlights:
- - new cifscreds program has been added. This will eventually allow for
stashing
I am looking to upgrade my Samba server to Samba 3.5.x from Samba 3.0.20
and openldap from 2.2.13 to 2.3.43.
Is there anyway to do this and still keep my current domain intact?
The interest in upgrading is so that we can suppport Win 7 systems.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
I am looking to upgrade my Samba server to Samba 3.5.x from Samba 3.0.20 and
openldap from 2.2.13 to 2.3.43.
Is there anyway to do this and still keep my current domain intact?
The interest in upgrading is so that we can suppport Win 7 systems.
Of course you can keep your current domain
W dniu 19.10.2010 16:50, Adrian Graham pisze:
Folks,
Having some fun with winbind on Samba 3.5.5 on RHEL5 and/or Centos5.
I’ve got it working so ssh logins work correctly and file permissions
are seemingly correct with created files etc. Backend authentication
is from a Win2K3R2 box running
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/10/2010, at 4:31 AM, john_deli...@ceridian.ca wrote:
I wasn't sure DFS was a good fit, my understanding of DFS is limited
(reading up today..).
As i understood it, Samba does not support DFS? Am i wrong? I have done some
googling into
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:19:36AM +1030, Indexer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/10/2010, at 4:31 AM, john_deli...@ceridian.ca wrote:
I wasn't sure DFS was a good fit, my understanding of DFS is limited
(reading up today..).
As i understood it, Samba
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 16:52 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:19:36AM +1030, Indexer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/10/2010, at 4:31 AM, john_deli...@ceridian.ca wrote:
I wasn't sure DFS was a good fit, my understanding of DFS is
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 09:19:00AM -0400, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
Jeremy did you get a chance to look at this . can you please pass your
comments on this.?
Just wanted to let you know I haven't forgotten this, just haven't had
time to get to it yet. Keep pinging me until I respond
Dear friends
My domain users in two diffrent OU, one OU is TEMP_USERS and other OU
is PEOPLE.
What i should mention in smb.conf ?
If i mention
ldap user suffix = ou=PEOPLE, then
users of ou TEMP_USERS is not able to authenticate.
Please guide me.
Thanks
--
Dear friends
My domain users in two diffrent OU, one OU is TEMP_USERS and other OU
is PEOPLE.
What i should mention in smb.conf ?
If i mention
ldap user suffix = ou=PEOPLE, then
users of ou TEMP_USERS is not able to authenticate.
Please guide me.
Thanks
--
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2010-10-18
00:00:03.0 -0600
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2010-10-19 00:00:03.0
-0600
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Build status as of Mon Oct 18 06:00:01 2010
+Build status as of Tue Oct
The branch, master has been updated
via 73d6bb7 s4-gensec Don't give more to sasl_encode() than it will
permit
via 15a3077 s4-gensec Don't upgrade all DIGEST-MD5 connections to seal
via f9c7365 s4-provisionbackend Allow a fixed URI to be specified for
LDAP backend
The branch, master has been updated
via a9b58f6 s4:samdb.py - remove a pointless comment
via 8c4f6bc s4:samdb.py - use a more standard way to get to the domain
realm/dns name
via 87fd2fd Addition of userPrincipalName attribute when new account is
created
from
The branch, master has been updated
via d652803 ldb:ldb_schema_attribute_by_name_internal - support the
whole unsigned int range
via a6d70dd s4:dsdb/schema/schema_init.c - remove a duplicated
talloc_free
from a9b58f6 s4:samdb.py - remove a pointless comment
The branch, master has been updated
via 4b4dcaf s4-dsdb Reset the error string after 'expected' errors.
via 439a1fe s4-dsdb Add module to send only 'simple' DNs to OpenLDAP
backends
via 5650e85 s4-dsdb Allow LDB_ERR_INVALID_DN_SYNTAX in
dsdb_load_partition_usn
via
The branch, master has been updated
via 38438c3 s4:nbt_server - fix a LDB counter type
from 4b4dcaf s4-dsdb Reset the error string after 'expected' errors.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 7db20c3 s3-waf: all subsystems complete now, no need for this loop
anymore.
via fa2a2d5 s3-waf: convert rpc into a subsystem.
from 38438c3 s4:nbt_server - fix a LDB counter type
The branch, v3-6-test has been updated
via f91c4b0 Add deadtime detection for SMB2. Correctly update lastused
timestamp across all active tcons. Should fix dfree cache not updating bug.
via bdd78af Add SMB2 paths to smbd/conn.c. Except for conn_idle_all(),
to be cleaned up next.
The branch, master has been updated
via 492ab4d s3-waf Use LIBSECRUITY subsystem from the common
wscript_build
from 7db20c3 s3-waf: all subsystems complete now, no need for this loop
anymore.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 45794dd Fix shadow warning for access variable.
via e7d0f47 Add deadtime detection for SMB2. Correctly update lastused
timestamp across all active tcons. Should fix dfree cache not updating bug.
via d7f4bea Add SMB2 paths to
The branch, master has been updated
via 39932f2 autobuild: create an autobuild.pid file
via 0a2e55b s4-mailslot: fixed handling of random collision in
temporary mailslot names
from 45794dd Fix shadow warning for access variable.
The branch, master has been updated
via 4a8c17a libcli/ldap Don't try and encode a control with a NULL OID
from 39932f2 autobuild: create an autobuild.pid file
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
46 matches
Mail list logo
