Hello list, I have Samba4.0.0beta2-GIT-6440720, yesterday I run git pull
for update my samba-master, the task was succeful, I read the step for
update and everything work god, when i run smclient --version say me
samba4 betta3, but but I found a great problem, my client windows xp,
ubuntu, all do
Hello,
I want to set up a Samba 4 AD server that authenticates
username/password against Windows 2008 R2 Server. The users of the
Samba domain will be logging to machines in Samba domain but their
credentials would be passed to the Windows AD server for
authentication (in a similar fashion as
Your body hears everything your mind says.
Naomi Judd
===
Release Announcements
=
This is is
Hi
We have just added a second DC to our existing domain. Replication is
working fine. We have setup the second DC with bind DLZ and that too is
working fine (except that the DNS partition is not replicated).
So, we now have two DC's and so also two DNS servers.
Question, Do I now have to go
Hi
We've just added a second DC to our domain, both DCs are Samba4
DC1 is also the s3fs file server. If that goes down then so does the
file-server. IOW, we can still authenticate via DC2 but we cannot do any
work!
What are my options here? Is it possible to sync the files to DC2 and
use
Apologies, have I put this in the wrong place? Is this perhaps something I need
to ask the technical list?
Dan Johnson
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf
Of Dan Johnson [d...@djjconsulting.com]
Sent: 21 June
On 25/06/12 13:12, Denis Cardon wrote:
Hi Rowland,
Well, after a bit of thought and downloading the kernel source from
Ubuntu, I am answering my own question.
I came across the same issue last week. Actually the newest kernel
(wheezy/ ubuntu 12.04), the /proc/mounts does not show options
Hello list, I have Samba4.0.0beta2-GIT-6440720, yesterday I run git pull
for update my samba-master, the task was succeful, I read the step for
update and everything work god, when i run smclient --version say me
samba4 betta3, but but I found a great problem, my client windows xp,
ubuntu, all do
On 26/06/2012 08:56, steve wrote:
Hi
We have just added a second DC to our existing domain. Replication is
working fine. We have setup the second DC with bind DLZ and that too
is working fine (except that the DNS partition is not replicated).
So, we now have two DC's and so also two DNS
On 26/06/2012 09:04, steve wrote:
Hi
We've just added a second DC to our domain, both DCs are Samba4
DC1 is also the s3fs file server. If that goes down then so does the
file-server. IOW, we can still authenticate via DC2 but we cannot do
any work!
What are my options here? Is it possible
On 26/06/12 11:45, Mike Howard wrote:
On 26/06/2012 08:56, steve wrote:
Hi
We have just added a second DC to our existing domain. Replication is
working fine. We have setup the second DC with bind DLZ and that too
is working fine (except that the DNS partition is not replicated).
So, we now
On 26/06/12 11:54, Mike Howard wrote:
On 26/06/2012 09:04, steve wrote:
Hi
We've just added a second DC to our domain, both DCs are Samba4
DC1 is also the s3fs file server. If that goes down then so does the
file-server. IOW, we can still authenticate via DC2 but we cannot do
any work!
What
To have your data high available put it on a replicating GLUSTER vol
(glusterfs-as many Fileservers as you want).
Or replicate it with drbd master master (if 2 DCs are the limitation)
Good Luck
Daniel
---
EDV Daniel Müller
Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik
On 26/06/2012 11:22, steve wrote:
On 26/06/12 11:54, Mike Howard wrote:
On 26/06/2012 09:04, steve wrote:
Hi
We've just added a second DC to our domain, both DCs are Samba4
DC1 is also the s3fs file server. If that goes down then so does the
file-server. IOW, we can still authenticate via DC2
Hello List,
I got called by a colleague last Friday to take a look at samba on an
existing
unix box, which turned out to be freebsd. Somehow I have managed to
make it past a decade of computing without seeing freebsd. while it is
different, it is not significantly so...
This box was built by
Hi,
I have a virtual IP which migrate from one server to another depending the
server status. I have a problem with this behaviour and samba.
When the IP migrates to another server, in the first server samba is
stopped.
When the IP is going to come back to the first server, samba is started and
I do this in centos with ucarp. When the 1st service goes down the virt IP
changes to the second
and ucarp restarts samba with virt IP.
Good Luck
Daniel
---
EDV Daniel Müller
Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
72076
Dear,
I have a working Samba 3.5.6 running on one of my servers onto which (existing)
users can successfully log on.
Recently, I needed to add some projects and some users but I cannot succeed in
letting these new users access the shares.
The smb.conf file is very small and I had only 4 users
All:
I have a samba server running on centos 6. samba version 3.5.10
I would like to authenticate against my ldap sever (openldap 2.3.43 on
centos 5.8).
I have this set up just fine on some of the samba servers that I am
running.
I am trying to bring a new samba server online that points to
Hi Rowland,
Well, after a bit of thought and downloading the kernel source from
Ubuntu, I am answering my own question.
I came across the same issue last week. Actually the newest kernel
(wheezy/ ubuntu 12.04), the /proc/mounts does not show options that are
setup by default in tune2fs
Hello everybody,
we have an annoying problem with our samba server randomly disconnecting the
home shares.
Our Application Data folders as well as Desktop are redirected to
directories in the user's home folder outside .profiledata to avoid the
copying during logon /logoff.
From time to time
When you say remotely you mean from another computer. Or do you mean
from another subnet?
If you recreated both samba accounts, and the two accounts behave
differently, then the problem may be in the underlying unix account.
Are the unix accounts defined in /etc/passwd?
I also find it
Thanks for the quick reply!
The server from which I tried to connect remotely is located within the same
subnet. The Windows PC is in another subnet.
All users exist since years in the /etc/passwd file. The four users that were
using the shares successfully in the past have UID 200, 230, 250
Some additional information, should this be helpful.
Our servers are all on subnet 192.168.5 and are running Solaris 10, Windows PCs
are on 192.168.3.
I didn't use any kind of mapping when creating the accounts. All I used was
pdbedit -a without any other parameter specified.
The global
I did some extra tests and cleared the password of user2. (I ran smbpasswd
user2 and clicked twice on enter without entering any password.)
In addition I allowed guests to log in on the new share
[projB_dirs]
comment = All ProjectB directories on Server1
path =
I have a server running samba-3.0.9-1.3E.10. And I'm trying to update that so I
can now add windows 7 pcs to my network. The server is a Dell Poweredge 2850
running Red Hat Enterprise Linux EX release 3 (taroon update 8). It's also
running Webmin version 1.580. I wanted to download the update
Typically, RPM's from RedHat or Fedora are pretty dependent on glibc and
other system libraries. Newer version of RedHat will have newer
versions of glibc, so the official packages are often not compatible
with older versions.
Sernet may have precompiled RPM's that may be useful.
If you don't want to spend money on RHEL, you can always look at CentOS
(which is a clone of RHEL) or Fedora.
I don't now if you can do an upgrade installation from RHEL to CentOS
or Fedora. I think not. But since either OS will support the ext3
file system used by RHEL, you should be able
Hi!
On 06/26/2012 06:40 PM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
Sernet may have precompiled RPM's that may be useful.
http://sernet.de/en/samba/samba-3/
We stopped building packages for RHEL3. So you'll not get updates anymore.
But there is still a more or less recent version of samba 3.5 for rhel3:
j...@brewtoncityschools.org wrote:
I have a server running samba-3.0.9-1.3E.10. And I'm trying to update that so I
can now add windows 7 pcs to my network. The server is a Dell Poweredge 2850
running Red Hat Enterprise Linux EX release 3 (taroon update 8). It's also
running Webmin version
Fellow List Members:
After upgrading our server to RHEL 6 from RHEL 5, I discovered that our
linux clients could create files on the share but not delete them unless
they first switch to root (su -).
This is very odd to me since the share in question is mounted with the
non-root user's
Hello,
When attempting to build samba-4.0.0beta2 on Solaris 10 update 9, the
following error is produced:
[ 530/3371] Compiling lib/tdb/test/external-agent.c
../lib/tdb/test/external-agent.c:7:17: error: err.h: No such file or
directory
Waf: Leaving directory
Dear fellow samba users,
I have a weird issue. I’ve installed winbind 3.6.5 from the debian backports
archive and joined is to an AD.
Wbinfo –u is ginving me all domain users.
Wbinfo –r is giving me the groups a user is members of but here comes the weird
thing. Of some users it gives
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Hi All;
Can any one help me, i am facing DNS related issue. this is my
configuration.
Centos 6.2 32bit OS
samba4beta3
bind-9.8.3-P1
First i configure samba4 as a domain controller.
then i configure other machine as a Additional domain controller, with
samba4. but when i run this command it
Your body hears everything your mind says.
Naomi Judd
===
Release Announcements
=
This is is
The branch, master has been updated
via 66f59f0 tdb: finish weaning off err.h.
from d1aeb2d s3:test_net_registry_check: eliminate local keyword in
shell
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 5df1fda s3: Restore async i/o with the native AIO interface
via 93399c1 s3:smbXsrv_tcon: pass max_tcons explicitly for
smbXsrv_tcon_table_init()
via 9c36781 s3:smbXsrv_session: pass max_sessions explicitly for
The branch, master has been updated
via 290e7de s3-pdbtest: Fix pdbtest to compare the same fields
via 43555d6 s4-samldb: do not talloc_steal() the elements of the
original request
via a7f26d5 s3-pdbtest: Report and handle errors in pdb-getsampwnam()
via ff4d8fc
The branch, master has been updated
via 98ec5e9 s3-torture: Use static printer for smbd spooler test
via e01ef8a s3-printing: use euid for vlp job tracking
via 1c2f154 s3-printing: fill print_generic sysjob id on job submission
via c29773d s3-printing: pass lpq
The branch, master has been updated
via a6c5376 Merge suggested fix from bug 7511 and enhance it
via 8ee76b1 s3:test_registry_upgrade: make more portable and eliminate
local keyword
from 98ec5e9 s3-torture: Use static printer for smbd spooler test
The branch, master has been updated
via ac4899e s3:net registry import: implement dry-run with --test
via 3705119 s3:net registry import: add an assert
via 8bf0850 s3:net registry import: reduce indentation
via d5ab328 s3:net registry import: fix the return code
The branch, master has been updated
via efa73ba s3:test_net_registry_check.sh: grep -E isn't portable, use
egrep
via 94afad2 tests: make test_ldb portable, eliminate local keyword
from ac4899e s3:net registry import: implement dry-run with --test
The branch, master has been updated
via 082b906 s3-printing: fix broken print_job_get_name() return
from efa73ba s3:test_net_registry_check.sh: grep -E isn't portable, use
egrep
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
44 matches
Mail list logo