I have tried everything, This is CentOS 6.4 with SELinux DISABLED, Bind
version BIND 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.17, samba 4.0.6 downloaded as a tar.gz
from samba.org -- I have read EVERY maillinglist, IRC Log, how-to on
google, tutorial on samba.org, and many many people have had this problem
and not
Myself and another person ran into this a few months back. We couldn't find
a solution.
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-March/172368.html
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-April/172670.html
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> I have tried everything, This i
This is a follow up to my previous...
Thomas, I have tried everything else I can think of, I WAS able to get
further debugging information out of samba, winbind, bind9_dlz, and whats
going wrong in this process for us, but I am not a developer I have no way
of knowing if this will be useful to yo
I am sorry to waste space on the mailing list for such a simple question,
but can anyone tell me:
1. Does samba_internal backend work with MX records yet?
2. Will BIND9_FLATFILE allow dynamic DNS updates when a computer joins the
domain?
Thanks.
GM
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 1:46 AM, Gary Maurizi
On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 16:59 +0200, spamv...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> im trying to setup Samba4 as dc.
>
> Ive downloaded the source and did a make && make install but after that i
> do not have any manpage.
>
> Ive found it in samba-4.0.5/docs/manpages but how can I install it ?
We i
4.0.6 file server for a 4.0.6 domain, reproducible with a 3.6.12, and
3.6.15 file server.
File created in a share are created according to the acl set, but not
when mounted by cifs:
Here is a share
[test]
read only = No
path = /home/test
Here is the acl:
getfacl test
# file: test
# owner: root
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 01:46 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> This is a follow up to my previous...
>
> Thomas, I have tried everything else I can think of, I WAS able to get
> further debugging information out of samba, winbind, bind9_dlz, and whats
> going wrong in this process for us, but I am not
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 01:50 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> I am sorry to waste space on the mailing list for such a simple question,
> but can anyone tell me:
>
> 1. Does samba_internal backend work with MX records yet?
Not in a 4.0 release. (Patch is in the queue for the next 4.0.x
release, and i
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:52 +0200, steve wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 01:46 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> > This is a follow up to my previous...
> >
> > Thomas, I have tried everything else I can think of, I WAS able to get
> > further debugging information out of samba, winbind, bind9_dlz, and
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 14:34 +0200, steve wrote:
> Version 4.0.7-GIT-d4cd828
> openSUSE 12.04 with bind9 installed but not configured.
>
> Hi
> Attempting to provision with BIND9_DLZ or samba_upgradedns from a
> functioning SAMBA_INTERNAL install produces:
>
> Creating DomainDnsZones and ForestDns
Hello,
some very rainy days let me finish the new HowTo earlier :-)
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_as_a_print_server
It's much more detailed than the old one and contains additional
information around that topic. Everything was validated in my test
environement and works fine.
Pleas
Hello Hans,
Am 01.06.2013 22:38, schrieb spamv...@googlemail.com:
1) netlogon
smb.conf
[netlogon]
path = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/asta-wh.de/scripts
read only = No
I can access the folder and execute the script as user, but it gets not
executed automaticly
Did you
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 23:31 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 14:34 +0200, steve wrote:
> > Version 4.0.7-GIT-d4cd828
> > openSUSE 12.04 with bind9 installed but not configured.
> >
> > Hi
> > Attempting to provision with BIND9_DLZ or samba_upgradedns from a
> > functioning SAM
Hi List,
I've been playing around with Samba for a few years time now but time's
come to make it into a production environment and I'm using it for some
services on my network as I said on earlier posts.
I'd like to ask maybe this might sound dumb question or has been
answered before so excu
2013.06.02 16:10, Andrew Bartlett rašė:
> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 01:50 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
>> I am sorry to waste space on the mailing list for such a simple question,
>> but can anyone tell me:
>>
>> 1. Does samba_internal backend work with MX records yet?
> Not in a 4.0 release. (Patch is
2013.06.02 16:16, Andrew Bartlett rašė:
> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:52 +0200, steve wrote:
>> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 01:46 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
>>> This is a follow up to my previous...
>>>
>>> Thomas, I have tried everything else I can think of, I WAS able to get
>>> further debugging informa
Hi again List,
I've got my Samba 4 running as a DC on my domain.local I'd like to
implement replication to have fail-over capabilities. I normally take
backups with the samba_backup script (helpful and advised).
I added a W2k8-R2 VM to my domain to have the RSAT available and then I
decided
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 21:03 +0200, steve wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 23:31 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 14:34 +0200, steve wrote:
> > > Version 4.0.7-GIT-d4cd828
> > > openSUSE 12.04 with bind9 installed but not configured.
> > >
> > > Hi
> > > Attempting to provision
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 23:50 +0300, Giedrius wrote:
> 2013.06.02 16:16, Andrew Bartlett rašė:
> > On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:52 +0200, steve wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 01:46 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> >>> This is a follow up to my previous...
> >>>
> >>> Thomas, I have tried everything else I
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 23:50 +0300, Giedrius wrote:
> 2013.06.02 16:16, Andrew Bartlett rašė:
> > On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:52 +0200, steve wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 01:46 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> >>> This is a follow up to my previous...
> >>>
> >>> Thomas, I have tried everything else I
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 00:05 +0200, steve wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 23:50 +0300, Giedrius wrote:
> > 2013.06.02 16:16, Andrew Bartlett rašė:
> > > On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:52 +0200, steve wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 01:46 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> > >>> This is a follow up to my prev
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 08:00 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> That is *very* weird. They may be another package with tdbbackup in a
> normal path. Otherwise, could you follow this up with the OpenSUSE
> folks?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew Bartlett
We've taken this up with them before:
http://web.a
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 00:48 +0200, steve wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 08:00 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> >
> > That is *very* weird. They may be another package with tdbbackup in a
> > normal path. Otherwise, could you follow this up with the OpenSUSE
> > folks?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
Hi,
I wanted to write this message in order to thank the Samba team for the work
they provided. With some colleagues we had to organize a national competitive
examination for the Education (in France) for which the candidates worked on
computers (on Windows 7). After thought, we had decided to
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 08:16 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 00:05 +0200, steve wrote:
> > Hi
> > openSUSE 12.3
> > This is the first time in many years where the SUSE/openSUSE bind has
> > _almost_ worked out of the box. They will not entertain non chrooted
> > installs.
>
>
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 00:56 +0200, François Lafont wrote:
> - a second member server identical to the first one (except for the name and
> the ip address) which copied in real time the previous server's data just in
> case.
Hi
Just curious. Did you rsync it? Did you try disabling the first file
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 08:51 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 00:48 +0200, steve wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 08:00 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > That is *very* weird. They may be another package with tdbbackup in a
> > > normal path. Otherwise, could you
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 01:11 +0200, steve wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 08:16 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 00:05 +0200, steve wrote:
>
> > > Hi
> > > openSUSE 12.3
> > > This is the first time in many years where the SUSE/openSUSE bind has
> > > _almost_ worked out of th
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 01:23 +0200, steve wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 08:51 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 00:48 +0200, steve wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 08:00 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > That is *very* weird. They may be another package
Hi everybody.
I´ve installed a new OpenLdap Server and performed the migration of the
database. All information was imported sucessfull because all my other
authentication services are working perfectly.
I have a domain in my ldap server and a FreeBSD machine that work as domain
PDC for a d
Hi,
I did that but it doesn't change the issue.
thanks
- Mail original -
De: "steve"
À: samba@lists.samba.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 16 Mai 2013 10:15:06
Objet: Re: [Samba] Access Denied when creating a GPO with any other domain
admins than administrator
On 14/05/13 18:40, Antoine Vacher wrote
Hi,
on windows xp client in gpedit.msc under Computer
Configuration\Administrative Templates I have only "windows component".
I need system sub menu to enable "always wait for the network at
computer startup".
Any suggestion?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read t
Hey Volker, thanks for the reply.
> Can you explain for really stupid people what this does and where the problem
> is?
Here's what the perl code is doing:
1) In a loop...
1.1) Write a file to the local disk, using a random filename and 5
random floats followed by a newline as the content.
1.2)
i setup a RedHat server with samba/kerberos/winbind.
I can retrieve my user and groups with wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g. BUT in the
listings, the name appears like that : wbinfo -u DOMAIN+username1
DOMAIN+username2 DOMAIN+username3 DOMAIN+username4
If i try to authenticate a user with wbinfo -a use
I think it's not reasonable that this lines
ln -s bin/default/source4/heimdal_build/asn1_compile.inst bin/asn1_compile
ln -s bin/default/source4/heimdal_build/compile_et.inst bin/compile_et
solve this, but it does.
It's samba-4.0.6 in CentOS 6.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the follo
Hi All,
I am planning to covert our company's AD server to Samba4, need to know if
Samba4 is complete replacement for Windows 2008 AD.
Is there a link to show features comparison, showing what is compatible and
what is not?
Regards,
Remy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
Hi All,
Is there any answer?
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Mario Almeida wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am planning to covert our company's AD server to Samba4, need to know if
> Samba4 is complete replacement for Windows 2008 AD.
>
> Is there a link to show features comparison, showing what is co
Hi Folks
If I have 2 x Samba4 AD DCs, a primary and secondary, am I correct in assuming
that if I add a Windows Client to the DOMAIN it should eventually replicate to
the secondary DC?
Paully
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.sam
I'm using samba 4.0.3 (host samba01) and samba 4.0.5 (samba02) as DCs. samba01
already existed and I used samba-tool domain join to join samba02 to domain
samba.x.y.z. This worked quiet well, but now replication fails:
/usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool drs showrepl
INBOUND NEIGHBORS
...
Dear,
Can anyone help me?
I'm having trouble backing up the Samba4.
When I run the command /usr/sbin/samba_backup, it brings the following
error: Error while
archiving /usr/local/backups/samba4_private.210513.tar.bz2
Thanks,
Rodrigo
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the f
Hi Andrew,
please have a look at my "uac" branch - in particular to commit
b357e9377c698a20989c339d1459ed00a342cf2b.
Thanks,
Matthias
Andrew Bartlett schrieb:
Matthias,
Any chance you can look into this for me?
Thanks,
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 15:56 +0800, Tide wrote:
the userAccountControl
Hello,
Le 03/06/2013 01:20, steve a écrit :
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 00:56 +0200, François Lafont wrote:
>
>> - a second member server identical to the first one (except for the name and
>> the ip address) which copied in real time the previous server's data just in
>> case.
>
> Hi
> Just curio
I want to thank you both so very much for your help.
It's another day and I'm back to it, refreshed, and determined to figure
out what is causing so many issues for the CentOS 6.4 users.
Going through the same exact steps on ubuntu 12.04 on a different machine
does give me working dynamic DNS upd
I think I might have figured out something about this Centos 6.4 thing and
BIND9_DLZ dynamic updates NOT working with the CentOS 6.4 bind package:
[root@server private]# named -V
BIND 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6_4.4 built with
'--build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu' '--host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gn
If you want to avoid all that just follow the DNS BIND on the wiki and compile
BIND YOURSELF. That'd save you many trouble.
I did that.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2/06/2013, at 22:16, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> I think I might have figured out something about this Centos 6.4 thing and
> BIND9_DLZ
Hey Rodrigo,
By any chance is Samba running when you try the backup?.
Cheers.
On 5/23/2013 11:12 AM, Rodrigo Emilio Sobrinho wrote:
Dear,
Can anyone help me?
I'm having trouble backing up the Samba4.
When I run the command /usr/sbin/samba_backup, it brings the following
error: Err
2013.06.03 01:14, Andrew Bartlett rašė:
> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 23:50 +0300, Giedrius wrote:
>> 2013.06.02 16:16, Andrew Bartlett rašė:
>>> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:52 +0200, steve wrote:
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 01:46 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> This is a follow up to my previous...
>
>
I removed the centos bind build and installed bind 9.9.3 from ISC source,
and went to /usr/local/samba/private/named.conf and changed the line from
bind 9.8 to bind 9.9 and now I get this error and named will not start with
the include line for samba in /etc/named.conf:
get: "dlz_dlopen: incorrect
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 17:40 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote:
> I want to thank you both so very much for your help.
>
> [root@server samba-master]# named -V
> BIND 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6_4.4 built with
> '--build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu' '--host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu'
> '--target=x86_64-re
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 09:36 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 01:11 +0200, steve wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 08:16 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> >
> > End users need something simple to install. We also need something that
> > does dynamic dns reliably. The strong point
On 6/3/2013 12:41 AM, Gary Maurizi wrote:
I removed the centos bind build and installed bind 9.9.3 from ISC source,
and went to /usr/local/samba/private/named.conf and changed the line from
bind 9.8 to bind 9.9 and now I get this error and named will not start with
the include line for samba in /
It is not "homes" anymore within samba4 it calls "home".
You need to set the rights for your netlogon from your adm windows client or
within ads tool in your user profile
---
EDV Daniel Müller
Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechl
52 matches
Mail list logo