Re: [Samba] ACL permissions with XP problem
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 09:47:53 -0600 Brad Sagowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RedHat 7.3 with XFS (using the XFS install disk) After installation I'd downloaded 2.2.7 src rpm from redhat and rebuilt it with the --with-acl-support option in the samba.spec file Did you have acl-dev installed when compiling Samba? Of not, the configure-process will kick ACL-support but continue compiling although you specified --with-acl-support. Make sure your smbd has ACL-support built in: ldd /usr/sbin/smbd The output should contain something like libacl.so.1 = /lib/libacl.so.1 So long, Max -- The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we're all damaged. Cpt. Picard, The Drumhead, StarTrek TNG http://homex.subnet.at/~max/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] compilation problems with 2.2.7a on OpenBSD 3.2 using--with-ldap sam
For whatever reason, the Makefiles that are generated don't tell gcc to look in /usr/local/include for header files. You don't need --libdir=/usr/local/lib and --includedir=/usr/local/include. I believe that those just tell where you want the libraries and header files installed when everything is said and done, not where to look while compiling. You just need to (assuming you're using bash): export CPPFLAGS='-I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib' before you run configure. If you are using a cshell (by the c shore? bad joke, nevermind): setenv CPPFLAGS '-I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib' I think. mark ps I think you can also use: CPPFLAGS='-I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib' ./configure --with-ldapsam mark -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba and LinuxMDK 9 file perms oddities?
Hi all I noticed a pretty strange behaviour regarding file permissions that sometimes change without any reason. I need to share the following two directories: /home/public (owner=root, group=root, perms=0777) /home/users (owner=root, group=users, perms=0770) the /home directory is owned by root, the group is root and permissions are set in this way: 0755. The above dirs are shared using these instructions in smb.conf: [grp] comment = Folder for group [%g] path = /home/%g guest ok = no public = no browseable = yes writable = yes create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 [public] comment = Public folder path = /home/public guest ok = no public = no browseable = yes writable = yes create mask = 0666 directory mask = 0777 When a member of group users connects to the [public] or [grp] share and interacts with them by creating dirs and/or files, something strange happens because file permissions change to: /home/public (owner=root, group=root, perms=0755) /home/users (owner=root, group=users, perms=0750) In a short words, the write flag disappears. As a result, the next time that a user logs in or interacts with shares, he won't be able to write files, create dirs, rename them and so on. I tried to shut down and restart samba to discover if that change is caused by the deamon itself and not by the use of the shares but I observed that restarting doesn't change file perms. Does anybody know the solution? Thanks :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba 2.2.8pre2 changelog
Hi, I read the changelog, and couldn't help noticing this: Changes since 2.2.8pre1 --- 8) Always use safe_strcpy not pstrcpy for malloc()'d strings 25) Merge from HEAD. Use pstrcpy not safe_strcpy. Did this change get reverted intentionally ? regards, Derkjan de Haan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba and LinuxMDK 9 file perms oddities?
AlF schrieb: When a member of group users connects to the [public] or [grp] share and interacts with them by creating dirs and/or files, something strange happens because file permissions change to: /home/public (owner=root, group=root, perms=0755) /home/users (owner=root, group=users, perms=0750) are u using winbind/ACL support? can u post the [general] section too? thx k -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] server side printers
Hi. Im an admin on a small network with about 100 clients running windows 95, 98, 98SE, windows 2000 and XP. Our server is running samba 2.2.5 and sharing one HP Laserjet 5M/MP. Our current setup works fine, but I am wondering How do I put windows clients drivers on my samba server to eliminate the need for users to choose printer drivers (and to have the windows cd around) when they add the samba shared printers? I am looking for help in creating the samba share whereupon the nessesary files could reside. And for generating the nessecary files, and putting them there. Also, I am wondering about the legality of the process: That is, since my users are residents at my dorm, they have their own private software, and the dorm which is running the server, doesnt have any windows licenses. I could borrow the relevant installation cds to generate the nessesary files, i guess, but would it be legal? I have been googling and reading documentation, but I could only find documentation relevant to versions previous to 2.2.0 and nothing that could help me. Finally, I dont know if I have to subscribe to this list to recieve replies, so please reply to my address rather than to the list. Regards Tor Bechmann Sorensen -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Linux to Linux with Samba?
Is it possible to allow two Linux computers to browse each other in a manner similar to the way a winbox and browse a Linux box with Samba? Ya know, like the network neighborhood thing, not the smbclient get put thing? Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Linux to windoze
Is it possible to allow your Liunx box see your winbox, just like the winbox can see or browse the Linux box with Samba? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Linux to Linux with Samba?
On Saturday 01 March 2003 09:27 am, pshook wrote: Is it possible to allow two Linux computers to browse each other in a manner similar to the way a winbox and browse a Linux box with Samba? Ya know, like the network neighborhood thing, not the smbclient get put thing? Check out LinNeighborhood: http://www.bnro.de/~schmidjo/ -- Stephen Carville [EMAIL PROTECTED] UNIX and Network Administrator DPSI 6033 W. Century Blvd, Ste 1075 Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-342-3602 Well, yes, we've deployed Linux and we're seeing reduced costs and increased functionality. But our competitors? Linux might be bad for them. Real bad. Our competitors should stick with what they have right now. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Linux to windoze
Yes, You will need services for unix (~$80) to make it happen. Or another program such as maestro nfs. We use services for unix and it works fine for us. -Original Message- From: pshook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat 3/1/2003 12:28 PM To: Samba Cc: Subject: [Samba] Linux to windoze Is it possible to allow your Liunx box see your winbox, just like the winbox can see or browse the Linux box with Samba? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba server side printer driver, how?
I think my previous message didnt reach the list. Therefor a resend. Hi. Im an admin on a small network with about 100 clients running windows 95, 98, 98SE, windows 2000 and XP. Our server is running samba 2.2.5 and sharing one HP Laserjet 5M/MP. Our current setup works fine, but I am wondering How do I put windows clients drivers on my samba server to eliminate the need for users to choose printer drivers (and to have the windows cd around) when they add the samba shared printers? I am looking for help in creating the samba share whereupon the nessesary files could reside. And for generating the nessecary files, and putting them there. Also, I am wondering about the legality of the process: That is, since my users are residents at my dorm, they have their own private software, and the dorm which is running the server, doesnt have any windows licenses. I could borrow the relevant installation cds to generate the nessesary files, i guess, but would it be legal? I have been googling and reading documentation, but I could only find documentation relevant to versions previous to 2.2.0 and nothing that could help me. Regards Tor Bechmann Sorensen -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] server side printers
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 11:56, Tor Bechmann Sørensen wrote: Also, I am wondering about the legality of the process: That is, since my users are residents at my dorm, they have their own private software, and the dorm which is running the server, doesnt have any windows licenses. I could borrow the relevant installation cds to generate the nessesary files, i guess, but would it be legal? the printer drivers are usually made by the manufacturer of the printer and are licensed by printer if at all. I have been googling and reading documentation, but I could only find documentation relevant to versions previous to 2.2.0 and nothing that could help me. the samba howto collection covers the print$ stuff accurately for all the 2.2 version and the 3.0 branch too Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Linux to windoze
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 12:28, pshook wrote: Is it possible to allow your Liunx box see your winbox, just like the winbox can see or browse the Linux box with Samba? yes smbclient will do what you want i think brad -- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Linux to windoze
On 2003.03.01 17:28 pshook wrote: Is it possible to allow your Liunx box see your winbox, just like the winbox can see or browse the Linux box with Samba? with gnome2 on my slackware 8.1 box I can use smb:// in the file manager to view the network. I know that kde also has the ability to view the windows networks. mark -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Linux to windoze
Is this without the use of a services on the windows end? -Original Message- From: mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 1:30 PM To: pshook Cc: Samba Subject: Re: [Samba] Linux to windoze On 2003.03.01 17:28 pshook wrote: Is it possible to allow your Liunx box see your winbox, just like the winbox can see or browse the Linux box with Samba? with gnome2 on my slackware 8.1 box I can use smb:// in the file manager to view the network. I know that kde also has the ability to view the windows networks. mark -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba]
RH73 samba2.2.7-1.7.3 Just getting a smb server going. Have some users who's login names are different from windows and Linux. Using a map file to map Linux users accounts to windows user accounts. When I watch the log.smb I see that the mapping is taking place however, the authentication doesn't. Would the fact that the Linux authentication is done by an LDAP server matter? The passwords are the same. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Linux to windoze
Reason I ask - is because I couldn't get this to work. -Original Message- From: mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 1:30 PM To: pshook Cc: Samba Subject: Re: [Samba] Linux to windoze On 2003.03.01 17:28 pshook wrote: Is it possible to allow your Liunx box see your winbox, just like the winbox can see or browse the Linux box with Samba? with gnome2 on my slackware 8.1 box I can use smb:// in the file manager to view the network. I know that kde also has the ability to view the windows networks. mark -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] preserving unix-win file permissions for backup via samba?
I am having difficulty in try to preserve permissions on Unix files that are copied from the samba server onto a Windows98 system, and then copied again via samba back to an 'upload' directory on the samba server. Specifically, I am sharing /etc (samba read only) for backup purposes, and while logged in as root on the windows system, I can drag and drop these files to the Windows desktop to back them up. How can I copy them back to the server via samba and still preserve their original unix permissions? 1. Do the files retain their permissions while they sit on a Win98/Fat32 file system? Will a NTFS partition help? I see that my unix umask is 0022 and so all of the files I copy (create) in the samba 'upload' directory inherit -rwxr--r-- perms. When I set my unix umask to then the files inherit -- perms (bad!). What can I do? I tried playing with create mask, security mask, directory mask, etc... thanks, peace Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] server side printers
the samba howto collection covers the print$ stuff accurately for all the 2.2 version and the 3.0 branch too Thank you for your answer Bradley. But Im afraid, that I already looked in the howto collection, and I didnt find information I could use, and gave up on that. I was hoping someone here on the list could lay it out a bit more clearly for me. Regards Tor Bechmann Sorensen -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba with ldap
RH73 samba2.2.7-1.7.3 Just getting a smb server going. Have some users who's login names are different from windows and Linux. Using a map file to map Linux users accounts to windows user accounts. When I watch the log.smb I see that the mapping is taking place however, the authentication doesn't. Would the fact that the Linux authentication is done by an LDAP server matter? The passwords are the same. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] preserving unix-win file permissions for backup viasamba?
How about a different solution: ( cd / ; tar cvzf /path/to/samba/share/etc-$( date +%Y-%m-%d ).tar.gz etc/ ) Then backup the tarball on your windows box. Now you have all of the file permissions stored inside the tarball. The problem is that file permissions on Windows and UNIX don't map neatly into each other. Good luck, -Martin : I am having difficulty in try to preserve permissions on Unix files that : are copied from the samba server onto a Windows98 system, and then copied : again via samba back to an 'upload' directory on the samba server. : : Specifically, I am sharing /etc (samba read only) for backup purposes, : and while logged in as root on the windows system, I can drag and drop : these files to the Windows desktop to back them up. How can I copy them : back to the server via samba and still preserve their original unix : permissions? : : 1. Do the files retain their permissions while they sit on a Win98/Fat32 : file system? Will a NTFS partition help? : : I see that my unix umask is 0022 and so all of the files I copy (create) : in the samba 'upload' directory inherit -rwxr--r-- perms. When I set my : unix umask to then the files inherit -- perms (bad!). What : can I do? : : I tried playing with create mask, security mask, directory mask, etc... : : thanks, peace : Brian : : : -- Martin A. Brown --- SecurePipe, Inc. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] server side printers
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 16:05, Tor Bechmann Sørensen wrote: the samba howto collection covers the print$ stuff accurately for all the 2.2 version and the 3.0 branch too Thank you for your answer Bradley. But Im afraid, that I already looked in the howto collection, and I didnt find information I could use, and gave up on that. I was hoping someone here on the list could lay it out a bit more clearly for me. i don't think it can get any clearer I took this from http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html#AEN798 6.2.1. Creating [print$] In order to support the uploading of printer driver files, you must first configure a file share named [print$]. The name of this share is hard coded in Samba's internals so the name is very important (print$ is the service used by Windows NT print servers to provide support for printer driver download). You should modify the server's smb.conf file to add the global parameters and to create the following file share (of course, some of the parameter values, such as 'path' are arbitrary and should be replaced with appropriate values for your site): ... I don't think anybody on the list is going to hold your hand any more than i already have. I read that document and set up the driver downloading with no serious trouble. If you have a specific problem like i tried to upload the driver but it failed with this error message and and this in the logs re-post here with those details. brad -- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] server side printers
Thanks again for your reply. I did read the part you mention. I did understand how to make the print$ share. The docs are clear on this part. I can now specify my question a bit more: what to do from there on to put the nessecary files in that share? I am not using windows myself, but my users are. The instructions given in the doc you mention seems to be applicable only if you have a NT server from which you want to upload drivers, or? The printer in question is a HP Laserjet 5M, and lpr is used for handling printjobs from samba. Do I need to collect files from windows installation cds and manually copy them to the share? What should I call the folder in which I put drivers for WindowsXP? I assume that I can replace @ntadmin with my own account name, or? And how will the printer installation wizard look to my users afterwards? Regards Tor Bechmann Sorensen -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] server side printers
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 17:00, Tor Bechmann Sørensen wrote: Thanks again for your reply. I did read the part you mention. I did understand how to make the print$ share. The docs are clear on this part. I can now specify my question a bit more: what to do from there on to put the nessecary files in that share? the docs are equally clear on this part. 6.2.2. Setting Drivers for Existing Printers The initial listing of printers in the Samba host's Printers folder will have no real printer driver assigned to them. By default, in Samba 2.2.0 this driver name was set to NO PRINTER DRIVER AVAILABLE FOR THIS PRINTER. Later versions changed this to a NULL string to allow the use tof the local Add Printer Wizard on NT/2000 clients. Attempting to view the printer properties for a printer which has this default driver assigned will result in the error message: Device settings cannot be displayed. The driver for the specified printer is not installed, only spooler properties will be displayed. Do you want to install the driver now? Click No in the error dialog and you will be presented with the printer properties window. The way assign a driver to a printer is to either * Use the New Driver... button to install a new printer driver, or * Select a driver from the popup list of installed drivers. Initially this list will be empty. If you wish to install printer drivers for client operating systems other than Windows NT x86, you will need to use the Sharing tab of the printer properties dialog. Assuming you have connected with a root account, you will also be able modify other printer properties such as ACLs and device settings using this dialog box. A few closing comments for this section, it is possible on a Windows NT print server to have printers listed in the Printers folder which are not shared. Samba does not make this distinction. By definition, the only printers of which Samba is aware are those which are specified as shares in smb.conf. Another interesting side note is that Windows NT clients do not use the SMB printer share, but rather can print directly to any printer on another Windows NT host using MS-RPC. This of course assumes that the printing client has the necessary privileges on the remote host serving the printer. The default permissions assigned by Windows NT to a printer gives the Print permissions to the Everyone well-known group. I am not using windows myself, but my users are. The instructions given in the doc you mention seems to be applicable only if you have a NT server from which you want to upload drivers, or? as specified in section 6.2.2 you must use a windows computer (not necessarily a windows NT server) to upload the drivers. The printer in question is a HP Laserjet 5M, and lpr is used for handling printjobs from samba. Do I need to collect files from windows installation cds and manually copy them to the share? You need to download the driver for the laserjet5m from hp and use the add printer wizard from a client computer (as specified in the docs) Do not try to install these drivers by hand - you would need to populate various tdb files etc. to make it work. the mechanism for spooling from your samba server to the printer is irrelevant to driver downloading. What should I call the folder in which I put drivers for WindowsXP? make the directory structure as specified in secitno 6.2.1 that will work for windowsXP, 2k NT 98 etc. I assume that I can replace @ntadmin with my own account name, or? yes And how will the printer installation wizard look to my users afterwards? they won't see a printer intallation wizard - they right click the printer they want and choose connect - the driver is then downloaded from the server and installed locally without further user interaction. brad -- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
re: [Samba] librsync [Solved]
I found the cvs repository at http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/librsync/librsync/ The sourceforge project was just setup a couple of days ago. That must have been why google could not find it yesterday. I believe the samba cvs site for librsync is now deprecated. The 0.9.5.1 version I was looking for looks to me to be a Jun. 27 cvs snapshot from wherever cvs was at that time. Greg All, Does anyone know anything about librsync, and where it is currently maintained on the web? It apparently is/was a samba project, but I'm not sure how it relates. The authors are listed as: Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrew Tridgell [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I suspect someone else did the 0.9.5.1 update, because only 0.9.5 is available on the rproxy site (http://rproxy.sourceforge.net/download.html). It is used by rdiff-backup (http://rdiff-backup.stanford.edu/) and they have a tarball for 0.9.5.1 on their site, but if you download it and try to compile it you get problems with missing files. I did a diff between 0.9.5 and 0.9.5.1 and there were about 3000 lines modified, so somebody has done a lot of work on it relatively recently. 0.9.5 does compile, but the above site says that it has memory leaks and the rdiff package will not work reliably. TIA Greg -- Greg Freemyer -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] server side printers
Thank you for your help, so far. the docs are equally clear on this part. Well, maybe if youre an expert, or someone already having experience in doing this with a NT printer server, but not from my point of view. Also I dont think the docs are very clear as to that doing this from a windows client is the ONLY way. But thanks for clearing that up. Another interesting side note is that Windows NT clients do not use the SMB printer share, but rather can print directly to any printer on another Windows NT host using MS-RPC. This of course assumes that the printing client has the necessary privileges on the remote host serving the printer. Does this apply for windowsXP as well? And does it mean that windows will send the print job directly to the printer per default (I dont want that, since I have a printer filter which counts pages and subtracts from the users printer account)? You need to download the driver for the laserjet5m from hp and use the add printer wizard from a client computer (as specified in the docs) Ok. Should this be done from a computer with each type of windows or will doing this from a single computer for instance with windowsXP do? And should I be able to see some files showing up in the folders in print$ after this process? Thanks again Tor Bechmann Sorensen -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Re: Hiding a share
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 01:57:23 + (GMT), John H Terpstra wrote: On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Jim Wharton wrote: Keep in mind however, this only hides the share in Network Neighborhood/My Network Places/explorer. It is still possible to do a net view command from the command line and see everything. Correct. That is why samba has a 'browseable = [ Yes | No]' option. Go figure. Which, in turn, leaves the share still visible in Network Neighborhood etc, as I initially reported. Go figure. :) -- Ciao, Marco. ...Hergest Ridge, Mike Oldfield 1974 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] RE: Hiding a share
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:26:47 -0600, Henrickson, Den wrote: [sharename$] [] The $ creates a hidden Windows share. To access you would have to do Right, thanks. I did actually forget that trick. But, uhm... can it be used also with the [netlogon] share? Will it be still correctly identified by Samba as the netlogon service, where to look for netlogon.bat, if I name it [netlogon$]? Thanks. -- Ciao, Marco. ...Stupid Dream, Porcupine Tree 1999 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Adding printer stops with Operation could not be completed
When trying to add the drivers downloaded extracted from HP (lj456ps.inf from lj632en.exe) I get the following message: Unable to install HP LaserJet 5P/5MP Postscript, Windows NT 4.0 or 200, Intel driver. Operation could not be completed. I also tried installing win95/98 drivers. In this case some files are copied but then I get the equivalent of the above message for 95/98. I am adding them from a windows XP machine. I am loggin onto the samba shares with my account which is in the staff group on the server. When I try to change some settings in the properties, like hold mismatched documents I get an access denied error message. Ive set up my smb.conf like this (relevant lines only): [global] printer admin = @staff [print$] path = /var/prndrv guest ok = no browseable = yes read only = yes write list = @staff /var/prndrv looks like this drwxrwxr-x2 root staff4096 Mar 2 03:07 W32ALPHA drwxrwxr-x2 root staff4096 Mar 2 03:08 W32MIPS drwxrwxr-x2 root staff4096 Mar 2 03:08 W32PPC drwxrwxr-x2 root staff4096 Mar 2 05:18 W32X86 drwxrwxr-x2 root staff4096 Mar 1 20:43 WIN40 and /var/prndrv itself has same ownership/permissions. I am using samba 2.2.5. The host specific log noodless.log (noodless is the win client i use to add the drivers from), shows no error messages. It does give a lot of messages, too much to quote here, but none of them are informative to me. Help would be appreciated Regards Tor Bechmann Sorensen -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Re: Linux to windoze
I could do that with Red Hat 7.2 Using smb://netbios name/folder. However, it was apparently removed from Red Hat 8.0. So, it depends on version of Linux. Tom -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 5:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Re: Linux to windoze I believe Mandrake uses something called Lisa for this although I am not sure if it is win/lin. pshook wrote: Is it possible to allow your Liunx box see your winbox, just like the winbox can see or browse the Linux box with Samba? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Re: Hiding a share
hi marco! Which, in turn, leaves the share still visible in Network Neighborhood etc, as I initially reported. Go figure. :) i don't understand your question. - we're using browsable = no over years. but i did not find, where u'll see the share. i can't see the share with 'net view' and not in network neighbourhood. - only if it's added in network neighbourhood with adding networkresource then it's visible (in a view situations, w2k/xp does this automaticly). *but* this feature of w2k/xp has nothing to do with visibility in network. it's only a directory in profiles, where the system lays *.lnk files to accessed shares. - so u mean it's visible. if it's not so as descripted, then please send me smb.conf and versionnr. / version of used windows (incl. sp). thx gk -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Adding printer stops with Operation could not becompleted
Unable to install HP LaserJet 5P/5MP Postscript, Windows NT 4.0 or 200, Intel driver. Operation could not be completed. maybe it's this: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;158042 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] [Fwd: samba 30alpha21 + NT4/2K WS-s]
Third problem is locally stored profiles. How I could make such set up that when user logs out from WS , then WS would copy changed profile back to server and delete it from WS ? It's question of security and hard disk space.. you can do that with a setting in gpedit.msc don't remember which one but i think i'll be obvious. but is it possible to establish central sec policy/configuration for all nt4/w2k/xp/98 workstations? i've heard something about working with nt4, so that every time users logs on , nt4 ws retreives policy from [netlogon]... but can anoyone explain in more details ? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] [Fwd: samba 30alpha21 + NT4/2K WS-s]
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 13:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [netlogon] share is like that: [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/samba/netlogon guest ok = no writable = no browseable = yes public = yes this is what i'm using ... [netlogon] path = /etc/samba/netlogon write list = root guest ok = Yes nt acl support = No do you have scriptPath set in ldap? i don't use logon scripts so i'm not sure you need it - just an idea. yes, when I put scriptPath: START.BAT in ldap then it works and START.BAT gets executed. but why it doesnt find it when in smb.conf logon script = START.BAT ? get_domain_user_groups: primary gid of user [john] is not a Domain group ! get_domain_user_groups: You should fix it, NT doesn't like that i get that sometimes - i just ignore it... btw it still comlpains same thing although I added users primary group to Domain Users and Users group? whats the catch? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Samba-2.2.8pre2 compiler warnings
Hello I just compiled Samba-2.2.8pre2 on 4 different systems: 1) Solaris 7 + cc: WorkShop Compilers 5.0 98/12/15 C 5.0 2) Solaris 9 + cc: WorkShop Compilers 5.0 98/12/15 C 5.0 3) Solaris 9 + cc: Forte Developer 7 C 5.4 2002/03/09 4) IRIX 6.5 + MIPSpro Compilers: Version 7.30 It compiled OK on all systems. I only ran it on 2) since the other systems are 'production' systems. It seems to run OK. There were a number of compiler warnings though. Two of the warnings looks like they could be serious: CLITAR == client/clitar.c, line 688: warning: argument #4 is incompatible with prototype: prototype: pointer to uint : include/proto.h, line 303 argument : pointer to ullong A 64 bit integer being used where a 32 bit integer is expected? smbtar make not work on bigendian machines? smbtar may not work for files over 2GB on little endian machines? IRIX TDBUTIL cc-1164 cc: WARNING File = tdb/tdbutil.c, Line = 46 Argument of type SIG_ATOMIC_T * is incompatible with parameter of type sig_atomic_t *. tdb_set_lock_alarm(gotalarm); A fuller list of warnings is: On 1) I got the following rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c, line 1209: warning: assignment type mismatch: pointer to uchar = pointer to char rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c, line : warning: assignment type mismatch: pointer to uchar = pointer to char passdb/secrets.c, line 291: warning: argument #2 is incompatible with prototype: prototype: pointer to char : include/proto.h, line 5018 argument : pointer to const char lib/util.c, line 62: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: -1 tdb/tdbutil.c, line 46: warning: argument #1 is incompatible with prototype: prototype: pointer to int : include/../tdb/tdb.h, line 130 argument : pointer to volatile int smbd/quotas.c, line 404: warning: argument #2 is incompatible with prototype: prototype: pointer to int : /usr/include/rpc/xdr.h, line 340 argument : pointer to uint smbd/quotas.c, line 408: warning: argument #2 is incompatible with prototype: prototype: pointer to int : /usr/include/rpc/xdr.h, line 340 argument : pointer to uint smbd/quotas.c, line 412: warning: argument #2 is incompatible with prototype: prototype: pointer to int : /usr/include/rpc/xdr.h, line 340 argument : pointer to uint client/clitar.c, line 688: warning: argument #4 is incompatible with prototype: prototype: pointer to uint : include/proto.h, line 303 argument : pointer to ullong Compiling tdb/tdbutil.c with -KPIC tdb/tdbutil.c, line 46: warning: argument #1 is incompatible with prototype: prototype: pointer to int : include/../tdb/tdb.h, line 130 argument : pointer to volatile int Compiling nsswitch/winbind_nss.c with -KPIC nsswitch/winbind_nss.c, line 600: warning: argument #2 is incompatible with prototype: prototype: pointer to int : nsswitch/winbind_nss.c, line 529 argument : pointer to uint (plus about 20 similar messages in nsswitch/winbind_nss.c). On 2) I get the same warnings as 1). On 3) I get the same as 1) and 2) with the following additions/changes: Compiling passdb/pass_check.c passdb/pass_check.c, line 669: warning: implicit function declaration: crypt Compiling client/clitar.c client/clitar.c, line 688: warning: argument #4 is incompatible with prototype: prototype: pointer to unsigned int : include/proto.h, line 303 argument : pointer to unsigned long long Compiling smbwrapper/smbw.c with -KPIC smbwrapper/smbw.c, line 1413: warning: implicit function declaration: _fork Compiling smbwrapper/smbw_dir.c with -KPIC smbwrapper/smbw_dir.c, line 570: warning: implicit function declaration: _getcwd Compiling smbwrapper/wrapped.c with -KPIC smbwrapper/wrapped.c, line 39: warning: implicit function declaration: smbw_path smbwrapper/wrapped.c, line 40: warning: implicit function declaration: smbw_open (plus lots of similar messages). On 4) I there are lots of warnings but these are the most interesting ones: Compiling smbd/password.c cc-1164 cc: WARNING File = smbd/password.c, Line = 664 Argument of type const char * is incompatible with parameter of type char \ * . setnetgrent(group); ^ Compiling smbd/reply.c cc-1552 cc: WARNING File = smbd/reply.c, Line = 2575 The variable data is set but never used. char *data; ^ cc-1552 cc: WARNING File = rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c, Line = 335 The variable i is set but never used. int i; Compiling rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c cc-1515 cc: WARNING File = rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c, Line = 1209 A value of type char * cannot be assigned to an entity of type unsigned char *. r_u-data = prs_alloc_mem(ps, r_u-size); ^ cc-1515 cc: WARNING File = rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c, Line = A value of type char * cannot be assigned to an
Re: client: browse doesn't work with only win98 in workgroup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Christopher R. Hertel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am interested in looking into this, but I won't have time until the weekend. ... In the mean time, I have modified smbw_dir.c to include a new function smbw_browse_workgroup_alternate() with the following patch. The code is basically stolen from nmblookup.c. More testing (and the Duh! factor upon reviewing the code) reveals that the code I added does not find all hosts in a workgroup; it finds some of the hosts. Actually, it finds _one_ host each time it's run, not necessarily the same host each time. I'll have to work on this some more if the cli_session_request() method can't be made to work properly with win98 and win95 machines as master browsers. Derrell
Re: client: browse doesn't work with only win98 in workgroup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Christopher R. Hertel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am interested in looking into this, but I won't have time until the weekend. ... In the mean time, I have modified smbw_dir.c to include a new function smbw_browse_workgroup_alternate() with the following patch. The code is basically stolen from nmblookup.c. More testing (and the Duh! factor upon reviewing the code) reveals that the code I added does not find all hosts in a workgroup; it finds some of the hosts. Actually, it finds _one_ host each time it's run, not necessarily the same host each time. I'll have to work on this some more if the cli_session_request() method can't be made to work properly with win98 and win95 machines as master browsers. Derrell, Can you give me a better idea of what you are trying to do? Above, you say you are trying to find all hosts that are members of a given workgroup. The question is: why? What is it that you are actually trying to accomplish? Keep in mind that there is a *very* big difference between the set of hosts that are members of a workgroup and the set of servers offering services within that workgroup. Two distinct systems are used to gather those two lists. Chris -)- -- Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: client: browse doesn't work with only win98 in workgroup
Christopher R. Hertel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Derrell, Can you give me a better idea of what you are trying to do? Above, you say you are trying to find all hosts that are members of a given workgroup. The question is: why? What is it that you are actually trying to accomplish? I'm working on providing a tree-style view of the network in a fashion similar to what Windows Explorer does. The top level of an SMB/CIFS network is something like Microsoft Windows Network. The next level down is the list of workgroups/domains within the network; then the hosts within each workgroup; then the shares within each share, etc. I don't know what version of Windows will be the master browser, and I don't want to force it by using Samba as the master browser. Therefore I have to be able to enumerate the hosts within a workgroup regardless of what versions of Windows happen to be on the network. Keep in mind that there is a *very* big difference between the set of hosts that are members of a workgroup and the set of servers offering services within that workgroup. Two distinct systems are used to gather those two lists. The latter works fine. If I already know the host name, I can see the shares on that host. The problem is enumerating the hosts within a workgroup. In the case of smbwrapper and smbsh, one is supposed to be able to do: ls /smb to see the list of workgroups/domains, and ls /smb/WORKGROUP to see the list of hosts within the workgroup WORKGROUP, and ls /smb/WORKGROUP/HOST to see a list of shares on the computer called HOST. All of these work with the method implemented in smbwrapper, except for enumerating the list of hosts within a workgroup where the master browser for the workgroup is a Windows 98 or Windows 95 machine. If there is a Windows 2000 server acting as the master browser for the workgroup, then obtaining the list of hosts within the workgroup works fine. However, the cli_session_request() call fails (gets a result of 0x83 from the peer) when the master browser is a win98 machine, so the list of hosts within the workgroup is therefore unavailable. Does this help clarify the problem? If not, please query me again and I'll try to explain differently. Thanks for your help! Derrell
auto-detecting krb versions for build
As some of you may have noticed, the UL builds on the farm don't work. The culprit is the pre- 0.5 heimdal that is installed, as it doesn't have AP_OPTS_USE_SUBKEY, which is needed to do password changes. Unless someone knows how to accomplish password changes to a win KDC without it, we need to be able to detect the package and release of kerberos installed. Heimdal before 0.5 doesn't have it. I'm not sure how far you have to go back in MIT to not find it. krb5-config takes a --version option and prints something like: heimdal 0.4d $Id: krb5-config.in,v 1.8 2001/01/29 06:56:51 assar Exp $ or in the case of MIT: Kerberos 5 release 0.0.0 Yes, 0.0.0, but I'm using a dev version. In any case, I'd like to take that output, and if it has heimdal, make a decision based on the number...since I'm not a wiz (more like a whiz) at these sorts of string cutting/comparing in shells...anyone want to tell me how to do it? Jim McDonough IBM Linux Technology Center Samba Team 6 Minuteman Drive Scarborough, ME 04074 USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (207) 885-5565 IBM tie-line: 776-9984
Windows client disconnect identification
Hi, The scenario I am testing is this: - Open an MS word file from windows client A - Disconnect the network cable from that windows client (emulate client failure) - Try to open the file from windows client B - file is locked. - Wait a few minutes (see below - the exact time is the issue here) - Try to open the file from windows client B - file is opened RW. I am wondering what sets the time that it will take for samba to find out that the first client is gone. At first, I tried to use the deadtime variable - but it is only valid when there are no open files (by the way, why?). Then I tried to set various timeouts in the TCP socket definition (socket options, various sysctl values), nothing worked. The lock release time is incosistent, and goes between 10 to over 20 minutes. I am wondering how can I shorten this timeout.. Here a transcript from the log, this time shows a 23 minutes timeout: [2003/02/28 18:22:42, 0] locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(662) on 32 bit NFS mounted file systems. [2003/02/28 18:46:05, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(431) read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = No route to host Pay attention that the error came from read() and not from select(). How can read timeout be controlled? Why does receive_message_or_smb() calls receive_smb() without any timeout? I am using samba-3.0-alpha20 on a Linux 2.4.18 machine, and windows 2k clients. Thanks, --yuval
Re: auto-detecting krb versions for build
Jim McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As some of you may have noticed, the UL builds on the farm don't work. The culprit is the pre- 0.5 heimdal that is installed, as it doesn't have AP_OPTS_USE_SUBKEY, which is needed to do password changes. Unless someone knows how to accomplish password changes to a win KDC without it, we need to be able to detect the package and release of kerberos installed. Heimdal before 0.5 doesn't have it. I'm not sure how far you have to go back in MIT to not find it. Heimdal before 0.5 didn't have AP_OPTS_USE_SUBKEY, however I think it allways generated and used a subkey anyway, so defining it to 0 should make it work. krb5-config takes a --version option and prints something like: heimdal 0.4d $Id: krb5-config.in,v 1.8 2001/01/29 06:56:51 assar Exp $ or in the case of MIT: Kerberos 5 release 0.0.0 Yes, 0.0.0, but I'm using a dev version. In any case, I'd like to take that output, and if it has heimdal, make a decision based on the number...since I'm not a wiz (more like a whiz) at these sorts of string cutting/comparing in shells...anyone want to tell me how to do it? `expr expr1 : expr2` or case statement is usully what I use. Love
Re: client: browse doesn't work with only win98 in workgroup
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christopher R. Hertel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm working on providing a tree-style view of the network in a fashion similar to what Windows Explorer does. The top level of an SMB/CIFS network is something like Microsoft Windows Network. The next level down is the list of workgroups/domains within the network; then the hosts within each workgroup; then the shares within each share, etc. I don't know what version of Windows will be the master browser, and I don't want to force it by using Samba as the master browser. Therefore I have to be able to enumerate the hosts within a workgroup regardless of what versions of Windows happen to be on the network. Hmmm, are you using libsmbclient? Regards - Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org, sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
Re: client: browse doesn't work with only win98 in workgroup
Okay, I understand the problem now. The problem is that W/9x boxes do not recognize the generic *SMBSERVER name in the NBT Session Setup Request. Also, W/9x boxes will send back an error if the called name is not correct in the NBT Session Setup Request. You should get a NEGATIVE SESSION RESPONSE (0x83) message with an error code of: 0x82: Called Name Not Present Since W/9x systems do not support the generic *SMBSERVER name, this error message is correct. Basically, it's the NBT equivalent of That port isn't listening for a connection. The solution is to find the Server Service name on the remote machine. This is typically done by sending a Node Status query and looking for a name with a suffix byte value of 0x20. More inline below... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christopher R. Hertel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Derrell, Can you give me a better idea of what you are trying to do? Above, you say you are trying to find all hosts that are members of a given workgroup. The question is: why? What is it that you are actually trying to accomplish? I'm working on providing a tree-style view of the network in a fashion similar to what Windows Explorer does. The top level of an SMB/CIFS network is something like Microsoft Windows Network. The next level down is the list of workgroups/domains within the network; Okay. At this level what you need to do is talk to *a\ny* Local Master Browser on the local LAN. If you know a specific workgroup name you can use that, otherwise you can find a list of workgroups by querying for the \x01\x02__MSBROWSE__\x0201 name. (That last 01 is the suffix byte, value 0x01). If the network is relatively stable, the LMBs will have exchanged data with one another, and any LMB will have the list of all other workgroups that are known. Anyway, once you have one (or more) LMB IP addresses, you can try to query for the Browse List. In this case, you want only the workgroup/domain entries, so what you should see on the wire is a NetServerEnum2 Domain Enum request. then the hosts within each workgroup; Nope. You can only get the list of servers in the workgroup that are advertising services. The list of all hosts which are workgroup members is not kept by the browse service. ...but that's not what you really want, anyway. What you really want is the list of known servers. That's a NetServerEnum2 with all the server type bits turned on. The LMB (or any available backup browser) should have this list. then the shares within each share, etc. Shares offered by the server. Okay. Note that some servers require authentication before they allow enumeration of shares. I don't know what version of Windows will be the master browser, and I don't want to force it by using Samba as the master browser. Right. Therefore I have to be able to enumerate the hosts within a workgroup regardless of what versions of Windows happen to be on the network. That's not a problem, as long as you have a valid CALLED name in the NBT Session Request. Samba ignores the CALLED name, W/NT and W2K accept the generic *SMBSERVER name (so Samba can 'guess'), and I don't know about W/XP. W/9x, as you've seen, requires the correct name in this field. Keep in mind that there is a *very* big difference between the set of hosts that are members of a workgroup and the set of servers offering services within that workgroup. Two distinct systems are used to gather those two lists. The latter works fine. If I already know the host name, I can see the shares on that host. No. That's not what I said. The latter in my note above is the set of servers offering services within a workgroup which is exactly what you're having trouble finding. The problem is enumerating the hosts within a workgroup. I know that this is pedantic, but it's important to understand that there is a difference between the set of hosts in a workgroup and the servers offering SMB services in the workgroup. A host may be a client and it may not be offering SMB services, in which case it will not show up when you try listing the servers in the workgroup. In the case of smbwrapper and smbsh, one is supposed to be able to do: ls /smb to see the list of workgroups/domains, and ls /smb/WORKGROUP to see the list of hosts within the workgroup WORKGROUP, and ...all of the servers in the workgroup... ls /smb/WORKGROUP/HOST to see a list of shares on the computer called HOST. Right. We leverage that hierarchy with the SMB URL. See: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-crhertel-smb-url-04.txt All of these work with the method implemented in smbwrapper, except for enumerating the list of hosts within a workgroup where the master browser for the workgroup is a Windows 98 or Windows 95 machine. Ah! Okay. As Richard asked... What tool are you using (libsmbclient?) to do this? It may be that you need to do the extra reverse-resolution step yourself. If there is a
Re: client: browse doesn't work with only win98 in workgroup
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: Okay, I understand the problem now. The problem is that W/9x boxes do not recognize the generic *SMBSERVER name in the NBT Session Setup Request. Also, W/9x boxes will send back an error if the called name is not correct in the NBT Session Setup Request. You should get a NEGATIVE SESSION RESPONSE (0x83) message with an error code of: 0x82: Called Name Not Present Since W/9x systems do not support the generic *SMBSERVER name, this error message is correct. Basically, it's the NBT equivalent of That port isn't listening for a connection. The solution is to find the Server Service name on the remote machine. This is typically done by sending a Node Status query and looking for a name with a suffix byte value of 0x20. There is code in libsmbclient to deal with this problem ... Regards - Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org, sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
Re: samba + w2k + kerberos + trusted realm
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:44:22AM +0100, Love wrote: - Using a keytab file would solve the problem below. Using /etc/krb5.keytab is bad idea, how about a own keytab for samba ? Doing hoops of strace stuff seems, well, strange. Why is using /etc/krb5.keytab a bad idea? The only reason I've ever seen for using separate keytabs is if you want different services to run in separate security contexts. Samba has to run as root, so /etc/krb5.keytab seems appropriate to me (as much as any keytab is appropriate -- there seem to still be some issues with using the keytab at all). What is it that limit samba to root ? When I use samba with afs beeing root will certenly not help samba access files, what else do samba need. While you wouldn't need to be root to gain access to a user's AFS-based files, uid-based access control is at the core of Samba's current implementation. Using an alternative keytab is only a benefit if this changes. This is not what I free is the important part of my mail. And the only reason why I did the comment was that the comment in the samba code that did hoops to store the key in the auth context instead of just using a keytab. Well, it's the part I felt I could comment on, since I don't know the Samba Kerberos code all that well. :) It is my understanding that the key is being stored in the secrets file instead of in a keytab because Samba also needs to have the plaintext password for salting, so until this is addressed, storing the keys in a keytab would only serve to confuse admins familiar with traditional Unix keytab handling. Or has this been addressed when I wasn't looking? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: samba + w2k + kerberos + trusted realm
What is it that limit samba to root ? When I use samba with afs beeing root will certenly not help samba access files, what else do samba need. SAMBA does need to bind to privileged ports. -- Luke -- Luke Howard | PADL Software Pty Ltd | www.padl.com
Re: samba + w2k + kerberos + trusted realm
Luke Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What is it that limit samba to root ? When I use samba with afs beeing root will certenly not help samba access files, what else do samba need. SAMBA does need to bind to privileged ports. Ok, sure. Now concentrate on the other issues :) Its not that simple as my patch it since samba breaks itself after a couple of hours and the key seem to change. Dunno what key, if its the in memory key or the key in the (ad/kdc) database. Love
Re: Samba doesn't free network resource with XP clients
Charles Bueche wrote: Hi, OK, I understand why this fix wasn't implemented as such, but still, my problem remain. Here is a copy of my post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject is Samba doesn't free network resource with XP clients, and the previous post, on 21.2.03, title 2.2.7a breaks on ATM stack on AIX 4.3. I would appreciate having your opinion on the best way to solve this problem. My opinion is that the best way to slove this problem is to figure out what is causing it and then fix whatever is broken. One random thought is to look at the socket options parameter in smb.conf and enable SO_KEEPALIVE ...or perhaps use the keepalive parameter. I don't know if these will fix anything because I can't tell from where I sit what the problem really is. I can't offer you any solutions if I don't know what is actually wrong. I can only offer guesses. Good luck. Chris -)- -- Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Samba] [Fwd: samba 30alpha21 + NT4/2K WS-s]
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 13:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [netlogon] share is like that: [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/samba/netlogon guest ok = no writable = no browseable = yes public = yes this is what i'm using ... [netlogon] path = /etc/samba/netlogon write list = root guest ok = Yes nt acl support = No do you have scriptPath set in ldap? i don't use logon scripts so i'm not sure you need it - just an idea. yes, when I put scriptPath: START.BAT in ldap then it works and START.BAT gets executed. but why it doesnt find it when in smb.conf logon script = START.BAT ? get_domain_user_groups: primary gid of user [john] is not a Domain group ! get_domain_user_groups: You should fix it, NT doesn't like that i get that sometimes - i just ignore it... btw it still comlpains same thing although I added users primary group to Domain Users and Users group? whats the catch?
Re: setting up SAMBA 1.9.17p4
Maruyama, Kazutoshi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I have a question. I am try to setting up SAMBA 1.9.17p4. (I am using OpenVMS 6.2, so I guess I cannot use the other samba version.) My windows cliant is Windows 2000. As I pointed out in my previous message, for that to work, you really need SAMBA 2.0.7 to work, even for the UNIX versions of SAMBA. Otherwise you will have no communications or intermittant communication problems. This is a protocol negotiation error that was fixed in SAMBA 2.0.7. I have no luck to accessing VAX directory from Windows 2000. Please give me some suggetion. Encypted passwords must be disabled in the client, otherwise look at my previous message that was posted to the list just before yours came out. Some people have been able to get Windows 2000 and early SAMBA to work. The bug in the protocol incompatablility seems to hit some people and not others. I assume that there is somehow I can see the directory from Windows 2000. When I see the error log from LOG.SMB;1, I got the message below. Anybody knows how to fix the problem. ** vms_file: no filespec available ** vms_stat: st = -1, mode = 001402 size = 1476395086 Can you do the steps in diagnostic.txt to make sure that you can connect locally? If you do not have a copy of diagnostic.txt, a copy can be obtained from http://www.samba.org. ===orginal=== Processing section [homes] doing parameter comment = Home Directories doing parameter browseable = yes doing parameter guest ok = yes doing parameter path = /sys$sysdevice2 doing parameter create mode = 0750 pm_process() returned Yes adding IPC service == vms_file: file_spec: - ** vms_file: no filespec available ** vms_stat: st = -1, mode = 001402 size = 1476395086 This looks like the user account used for access did not have access to one or more of the directories required to complete the login or access the file. On my post that immediately preceded yours, I reference a FAQ that I wrote that should give you many other tips. -John [EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal Opinion Only PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
re: SAMBA 2.2.4 or 2.2.7a and broken pipe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carl Gunnar Linden, MSL Stockholm Sweden.) wrote: I am running OpenVMS V7.3 and Compaq TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS Alpha Version V5.3 - ECO 1 I try to run SAMBA 2.2.4 or 2.2.7a. It works with TCPIP V5.3-18 but I think it stopped working since I applied the TCPIP_ECO V5.3-181 patch. snip Has anybody else seen something like this and what is a broken pipe? A broken pipe indicates a general connection problem. By it self it is not useful to tell you what the problem is. I would try the nmblookup (OpenVMS), NET VIEW (DOS Command prompt) tests to see if you can get information that way. There is a file diagnostic.txt that should be in the SAMBA distribution that describes how isolate some of these problems. You can get a copy of it at http://www.samba.org. The other thing to do is to increase the error level for the SMBD process. Previous versions of SAMBA allowed this to be done by defining a SYSTEM wide logical. SAMBA 2.0.6 allows the smbd process to be run interactively so that these tests can be more easily run. I do not know if the SAMBA 2.2.x branch has this ability. -John [EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal Opinion Only PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
CVS update: samba/source/smbd
Date: Sat Mar 1 10:47:38 2003 Author: tridge Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/smbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv28920 Modified Files: server.c Log Message: i forgot to commit the privilege db init call Revisions: server.c1.409 = 1.410 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/server.c?r1=1.409r2=1.410
