FreeBSD binaries

[John Ebli]

Are there any Samba binary for FreeBSD?

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: samba + winbindd with NT-DC problem... i'm stuck.

[leopardb]

Björn Andersen wrote:

Hello Group,

I'm really stuck here.  I try to get an samba to authenticate it's users
nicely
against an NT-DC, which will later be upgraded to W2K or W2K3
My system : Suse 8.1, samba-2.2.5-80, samba-client-2.2.5-80

My test-config for smb:
[global]
   winbind separator = +
   winbind cache time = 0
   template shell = /bin/bash
   template homedir = /home/%D/%U
   winbind uid = 1-2
   winbind gid = 1-2
   workgroup = FOERDE
   security = domain
   encrypt passwords = Yes
   password server = SMSERVER SERVER01
[daten]
   path = /srv/samba/daten
   writeable = no
   write list = root FOERDE+300
   valid users = root 300 FOERDE+300 @FOERDE+218
winbindd runs as daemon, wbinfo -u and  wbinfo -g  gives the right
domain users  groups,
as well as getent group  and   getent passwd.
strangely even ...
 # wbinfo -a foerde+300%password
works with an output of...
 plaintext password authentication succeeded
 error code was NT_STATUS_OK (0x0)
 challenge/response password authentication succeeded
 error code was NT_STATUS_OK (0x0)
I inserted in /etc/nsswitch.conf
 passwd: files winbind
 group:  files winbind
 shadow: files winbind nis
to activate winbind. I have not changed anything in PAM because I only need
Domain Users
to access Win-Shares, not to login or anything else.
But with ... :
 web1-50:~ # smbclient //web3-77/daten -U 300 -W foerde
i only get this output... :
 added interface ip=150.10.30.50 bcast=150.10.30.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
 added interface ip=10.1.110.20 bcast=10.1.110.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
 Password: *
 Domain=[FOERDE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.5]
 tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
Logfiles :
messages: nothing
log.winbind : nothing
log.smbd : nothing
log.nmbd : nothing
With a wrong PW i get logentries Error was NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD.
which seems right. But nothing with right PW. Sadly no logon as well. My
Testuser is 300,
as you can see i tryed some different syntax for user in smb.conf as well as
in smbclient. No good.
What am I doing wrong ? Especially because wbinfo -a works, I thought I
was quite close.
But I didn't make any progress for days now..
What did I forget ?
Please Help..

Björn Andersen



 

I've exactly the same problem. Did you receive any answer ?

Re: samba + winbindd with NT-DC problem... i'm stuck.

[Leandro Ariel Gomez Chavarria]

I think your problem is this:
  passwd: files winbind
  group:  files winbind
  shadow: files winbind nis

the correct modification for nsswitch is 
 passwd: files winbind
 group:  files winbind
 shadow: files nis

DON'T put winbind in shadow line!

then try with getenet passwd or getent group and you should see all
users in /etc/passwd and after them domain users.

let me know if it works 

good luck, leandro.-

 leopardb [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/21/03 07:30am 
Björn Andersen wrote:

Hello Group,

I'm really stuck here.  I try to get an samba to authenticate it's
users
nicely
against an NT-DC, which will later be upgraded to W2K or W2K3

My system : Suse 8.1, samba-2.2.5-80, samba-client-2.2.5-80

My test-config for smb:
[global]
winbind separator = +
winbind cache time = 0
template shell = /bin/bash
template homedir = /home/%D/%U
winbind uid = 1-2
winbind gid = 1-2
workgroup = FOERDE
security = domain
encrypt passwords = Yes
password server = SMSERVER SERVER01
[daten]
path = /srv/samba/daten
writeable = no
write list = root FOERDE+300
valid users = root 300 FOERDE+300 @FOERDE+218

winbindd runs as daemon, wbinfo -u and  wbinfo -g  gives the
right
domain users  groups,
as well as getent group  and   getent passwd.
strangely even ...
  # wbinfo -a foerde+300%password
works with an output of...
  plaintext password authentication succeeded
  error code was NT_STATUS_OK (0x0)
  challenge/response password authentication succeeded
  error code was NT_STATUS_OK (0x0)

I inserted in /etc/nsswitch.conf
  passwd: files winbind
  group:  files winbind
  shadow: files winbind nis
to activate winbind. I have not changed anything in PAM because I only
need
Domain Users
to access Win-Shares, not to login or anything else.
But with ... :
  web1-50:~ # smbclient //web3-77/daten -U 300 -W foerde
i only get this output... :
  added interface ip=150.10.30.50 bcast=150.10.30.255
nmask=255.255.255.0
  added interface ip=10.1.110.20 bcast=10.1.110.255
nmask=255.255.255.0
  Password: *
  Domain=[FOERDE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.5]
  tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD

Logfiles :
messages: nothing
log.winbind : nothing
log.smbd : nothing
log.nmbd : nothing

With a wrong PW i get logentries Error was
NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD.
which seems right. But nothing with right PW. Sadly no logon as well.
My
Testuser is 300,
as you can see i tryed some different syntax for user in smb.conf as
well as
in smbclient. No good.

What am I doing wrong ? Especially because wbinfo -a works, I
thought I
was quite close.
But I didn't make any progress for days now..
What did I forget ?

Please Help..

Björn Andersen




  

I've exactly the same problem. Did you receive any answer ?

[Samba] winbindd

[Grosswiler Roger]

hi all,

as i heard, i need winbind to connect linux-clients on samba. i installed
this - without pam (in the hope this would work...) but this constellation
seems to be needed, as i still cannot connect, even if winbind logs my
domain as accepted.

Do i really have to do the pam-configuration on the samba-server-side
too?? i just thought, it was enough to authentificate against smbpasswd.
is there always a comparison against /etc/passwd done because of access
rights?

thx for any info
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and the HP PSC 750 printer (printing over cups)

[Grosswiler Roger]

still have this problems using the hp psc750. found now some funny entries
in my logs...

printing/print_cups.c:cups_job_submit(756)  Unable to print file to usblp0 -
client-error-document-format-not-supported : 2 Time(s)

seems that i have a format-problembut where???

HEEELP!!

 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.7.0
 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 [Samba] Samba 3.0 and the HP PSC 750 printer (printing over cups)

 * To: samba at listsdotsambadotorg
 * Subject: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and the HP PSC 750 printer (printing
 over cups)
 * From: Grosswiler Roger roger at gwchdotnet
 * Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:34:27 +0100 (CET)

 hi all,

 i have samba 3.0 on a fedora-linux running. almost everyting works fine,
 except one printer, my hp psc 750 (connected via usb) is not printing
 via
 samba.

 I get pages printed (via cups or whatever) if i print from the
 localhost.

 So, here a few data from my smb.conf:
printcap name = cups
printing = cups
load printers = yes
 [printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = no
 # Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print
public = yes
guest ok = yes
writable = no
printable = yes

 any idea??


 If there is a PPD file involved with your printing setup,
 have you by any chance checked it against the online CUPS PPD
 validator? See here:

http://www.cups.org/testppd

 or run the cupstestppd program yourself

cupstest:
 cupstestppd /etc/cups/ppd/usblp0.ppd
/etc/cups/ppd/usblp0.ppd: PASS
 a nice resultthe printer prints locally without any problem. its just
samba no printing... see info at top from my logs.

 Which version of CUPS are you using? Which drivers are you
 using on the Windows client side?

 If you are using by any chance the client sends PostScript,
 CUPS converts for non-PS target printer-approach, then:
 which PostScript driver are you using on the clients?

 There is a little issue with the PPD generated by PPD-o-matic
 (on http://www.linuxprinting.org/): The user visible translation
 strings, indicating the print options for the various GUIs, may
 contain more than 40 characters (which is legal according to
 the Adobe PPD specification), but the CUPS PostScript driver for
 WinNT/2k/XP does not correctly work with these PPDs

 There are 3 possible workarounds:

   * enable the checkbox of the online-PPD-generator at Linuxprinting.org
 to limit the strings to 40 chars per line and generate a new PPD
 for the  HP PSC 750:

   http://www.linuxprinting.org/show_driver.cgi?driver=hpijs
   (don't forget to check the GUI texts limited to 39 characters
 box!)

   * use the Adobe PostScript drivers instead of the CUPS PostScript
 driver (may give you some other drawbacks)

   * upgrade to the current RC1 of the version 5 of the CUPS PostScript
 driver (which now is digesting 80 characters per string)

 Cheers,
 Kurt

 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and the HP PSC 750 printer (printing over cups)

[Grosswiler Roger]

and i am sure, that it is an effect of samba 3.0, as i can print locally
to this printer WITHOUT ANY PROBLEM!

 still have this problems using the hp psc750. found now some funny entries
 in my logs...

 printing/print_cups.c:cups_job_submit(756)  Unable to print file to usblp0
 -
 client-error-document-format-not-supported : 2 Time(s)

 seems that i have a format-problembut where???

 HEEELP!!

 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.7.0
 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 [Samba] Samba 3.0 and the HP PSC 750 printer (printing over cups)

 * To: samba at listsdotsambadotorg
 * Subject: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and the HP PSC 750 printer (printing
 over cups)
 * From: Grosswiler Roger roger at gwchdotnet
 * Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:34:27 +0100 (CET)

 hi all,

 i have samba 3.0 on a fedora-linux running. almost everyting works
 fine,
 except one printer, my hp psc 750 (connected via usb) is not printing
 via
 samba.

 I get pages printed (via cups or whatever) if i print from the
 localhost.

 So, here a few data from my smb.conf:
printcap name = cups
printing = cups
load printers = yes
 [printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = no
 # Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print
public = yes
guest ok = yes
writable = no
printable = yes

 any idea??


 If there is a PPD file involved with your printing setup,
 have you by any chance checked it against the online CUPS PPD
 validator? See here:

http://www.cups.org/testppd

 or run the cupstestppd program yourself

 cupstest:
  cupstestppd /etc/cups/ppd/usblp0.ppd
 /etc/cups/ppd/usblp0.ppd: PASS
  a nice resultthe printer prints locally without any problem. its just
 samba no printing... see info at top from my logs.

 Which version of CUPS are you using? Which drivers are you
 using on the Windows client side?

 If you are using by any chance the client sends PostScript,
 CUPS converts for non-PS target printer-approach, then:
 which PostScript driver are you using on the clients?

 There is a little issue with the PPD generated by PPD-o-matic
 (on http://www.linuxprinting.org/): The user visible translation
 strings, indicating the print options for the various GUIs, may
 contain more than 40 characters (which is legal according to
 the Adobe PPD specification), but the CUPS PostScript driver for
 WinNT/2k/XP does not correctly work with these PPDs

 There are 3 possible workarounds:

   * enable the checkbox of the online-PPD-generator at Linuxprinting.org
 to limit the strings to 40 chars per line and generate a new PPD
 for the  HP PSC 750:

   http://www.linuxprinting.org/show_driver.cgi?driver=hpijs
   (don't forget to check the GUI texts limited to 39 characters
 box!)

   * use the Adobe PostScript drivers instead of the CUPS PostScript
 driver (may give you some other drawbacks)

   * upgrade to the current RC1 of the version 5 of the CUPS PostScript
 driver (which now is digesting 80 characters per string)

 Cheers,
 Kurt

 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and the HP PSC 750 printer (printing over cups)

[Grosswiler Roger]

and i am sure this is an effect on Samba 3.0, as on the local system i
can print on this printer

 still have this problems using the hp psc750. found now some funny entries
 in my logs...

 printing/print_cups.c:cups_job_submit(756)  Unable to print file to usblp0
 -
 client-error-document-format-not-supported : 2 Time(s)

 seems that i have a format-problembut where???

 HEEELP!!

 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.7.0
 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 [Samba] Samba 3.0 and the HP PSC 750 printer (printing over cups)

 * To: samba at listsdotsambadotorg
 * Subject: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and the HP PSC 750 printer (printing
 over cups)
 * From: Grosswiler Roger roger at gwchdotnet
 * Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:34:27 +0100 (CET)

 hi all,

 i have samba 3.0 on a fedora-linux running. almost everyting works
 fine,
 except one printer, my hp psc 750 (connected via usb) is not printing
 via
 samba.

 I get pages printed (via cups or whatever) if i print from the
 localhost.

 So, here a few data from my smb.conf:
printcap name = cups
printing = cups
load printers = yes
 [printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = no
 # Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print
public = yes
guest ok = yes
writable = no
printable = yes

 any idea??


 If there is a PPD file involved with your printing setup,
 have you by any chance checked it against the online CUPS PPD
 validator? See here:

http://www.cups.org/testppd

 or run the cupstestppd program yourself

 cupstest:
  cupstestppd /etc/cups/ppd/usblp0.ppd
 /etc/cups/ppd/usblp0.ppd: PASS
  a nice resultthe printer prints locally without any problem. its just
 samba no printing... see info at top from my logs.

 Which version of CUPS are you using? Which drivers are you
 using on the Windows client side?

 If you are using by any chance the client sends PostScript,
 CUPS converts for non-PS target printer-approach, then:
 which PostScript driver are you using on the clients?

 There is a little issue with the PPD generated by PPD-o-matic
 (on http://www.linuxprinting.org/): The user visible translation
 strings, indicating the print options for the various GUIs, may
 contain more than 40 characters (which is legal according to
 the Adobe PPD specification), but the CUPS PostScript driver for
 WinNT/2k/XP does not correctly work with these PPDs

 There are 3 possible workarounds:

   * enable the checkbox of the online-PPD-generator at Linuxprinting.org
 to limit the strings to 40 chars per line and generate a new PPD
 for the  HP PSC 750:

   http://www.linuxprinting.org/show_driver.cgi?driver=hpijs
   (don't forget to check the GUI texts limited to 39 characters
 box!)

   * use the Adobe PostScript drivers instead of the CUPS PostScript
 driver (may give you some other drawbacks)

   * upgrade to the current RC1 of the version 5 of the CUPS PostScript
 driver (which now is digesting 80 characters per string)

 Cheers,
 Kurt

 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Samba vs DHCP

[AVMEJIA]

I was using a Samba server under a SUNOS 5.5.1 operative system. This
SUN machine was the server of a number of Lynux (Mandrake) and Windows
(95,98, XP) computers in a TCP/IP network with fixed IP numbers. We were
oblied to change to DHCP recently. As our network has a huge number of
computers I am running the smbd and nmbd daemos of the Samba with an
identification in such a way that only those windows  computers having
the WINS protocolo with the same identification were able 'to see' this
machine. Under DHCP, at least for Windows 98, there is no any
configuration for this protocol in such a way that now although my
subnetwork is transparent for all SUN and Lynux systems, those Windows
98 working under DHCP are not able to recognize the Samba server.
Obviously there is a trivial solution, I could eliminate the
identification in the daemon of the Samba server but the price to pay is
being transaparent for all the computers on my network (more than four
thousand), I assume there should be some way in the configuration of
Samba to allow a particular internet address to access the Samba server
although it is not able to see it, due to the identification. Does
anybody know how to do it? Thanks in Advance. Alfredo


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Program Launcher

[Arulthas]

Hi All,

I need a program launcher where I can execute from shell for my windows box
using the file server (samba). Any recommended software. I know this is
possible in Novell either using NMENU or Application Launcher (ZEN works).

Thank you.

Regards,

Arulthas
IT Officer
APM AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS BERHAD.

___
 Please visit our site at www.apm-automotive.com

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
This communication may contain material protected by intellectual property
rights laws. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have
received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding,
printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If it has come to
you in error, please notify the sender immediately. You should not copy this
email, disclose its contents to anyone else, or take any action based on it.



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] how legal is samba

[Tom Crummey]

Hello Ed,

My understanding of the licensing issue is that *any* client that uses
a windows server, whether directly, or indirectly via Samba requires
a Client Access license.

Tom.


 Tom Crummey, Systems and Network Manager,  EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering,  
 University College London,   TEL: +44 (0)20 7679 3898
 Torrington Place,FAX: +44 (0)20 7388 9325
 London, UK, WC1E 7JE. 


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Samba with winbind trouble

[LINDER Thierry]

Hello,

I try to implement a samba server (2.2.7a) with the authentifiactions via winbind to a 
PDC W2000.
When I test winbind, it works:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -t
Secret is good
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -a tli%password
plaintext password authentication succeeded
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# 

I enable the winbind on the /etc/nsswitch.conf:

passwd: files winbind
shadow: files 
group:  files winbind

If I try to do a su to my user which is not declared in my /etc/passwd, it works fine:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# su - tli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$ 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$ 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$ id
uid=10061(tli) gid=1(Domain Users) groups=1(Domain Users),10062(PRJ - Gestion 
de projets),10058(KAM),10054(Team-Elargi),10018(IT Unix),10060(PRJ - 
Sharepoint),10053(testgrp)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$ 

Also, I assume that the winbind levell is OK.
But, If I try to open a share with smbclient, I can't:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbclient -L pxtest
added interface ip=172.30.1.167 bcast=172.30.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Password: 
Anonymous login successful
Domain=[UDITIS] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix]

Sharename  Type  Comment
-    ---
test   Disk  Share de test pour les ACL's
IPC$   IPC   IPC Service (Samba Server 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix 
+ ACL's support)
ADMIN$ Disk  IPC Service (Samba Server 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix 
+ ACL's support)

Server   Comment
----
PXTEST   Samba Server 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix + ACL's 
UDNEJ102 

WorkgroupMaster
----
UDITIS   UDNEJ102
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbclient //pxtest/tli -U tli
added interface ip=172.30.1.167 bcast=172.30.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Password: 
session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# 

Here is my smb.conf configuration file:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# cat smb.conf
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from udpexp07.uditis.ch (172.30.1.131)
# Date: 2003/11/21 10:22:37

# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = UDITIS
netbios name = PXTEST
server string = Samba Server %v + ACL's support
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = No
obey pam restrictions = Yes
password server = udnej102.uditis.ch
pam password change = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n 
*passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
unix password sync = Yes
log level = 2
log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log
max log size = 0
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
preferred master = No
local master = No
domain master = No
dns proxy = No
winbind uid = 1-2
winbind gid = 1-2
template homedir = /home/test/%U
template shell = /bin/bash
winbind cache time = 0
winbind use default domain = Yes
guest account = Guest
printing = cups

[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
read only = No
create mask = 0664
directory mask = 0775
browseable = No

[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
printable = Yes
browseable = No

[test]
comment = Share de test pour les ACL's
path = /home/test
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# 

Thanks by advance to help me on this trouble, because I found nothing serious on the 
logs and I passed through alla my ideas ...

Many thanks

Thierry
--

Thierry Linder   Tél. central +41 (0)32 557 55 00
Mandataire CommercialMobile   +41 (0)79 473 92 35
Key Account Manager  Fax  +41 (0)32 557 55 05
Rue de la Gare 4   
CH 2034 Peseux (NE)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.uditis.ch 

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Antwort: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and the HP PSC 750 printer (printing over cups)

[Stefan . Iven]

I had the same, when I was trying to print on Cups printer
with vendor drivers.

I switched on raw printing, (because i need it) and everything was fine.

Maybe you are using vendordivers and not postscriptdrivers??

Stefan


still have this problems using the hp psc750. found now some funny entries
in my logs...

printing/print_cups.c:cups_job_submit(756)  Unable to print file to usblp0
-
client-error-document-format-not-supported : 2 Time(s)

seems that i have a format-problembut where???

HEEELP!!

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: Antwort: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and the HP PSC 750 printer (printingover cups)

[Grosswiler Roger]

This could be a possibility. how do i change this? what makes me wonder a
little bit, is that i just cannot print via the samba (smb-protocol). but
locally it works finebut perhaps your workaround helps me...which
driver did you take for your psc750? i am using the hpjis-driver




 I had the same, when I was trying to print on Cups printer
 with vendor drivers.

 I switched on raw printing, (because i need it) and everything was fine.

 Maybe you are using vendordivers and not postscriptdrivers??

 Stefan


still have this problems using the hp psc750. found now some funny
 entries
in my logs...

printing/print_cups.c:cups_job_submit(756)  Unable to print file to
 usblp0
 -
client-error-document-format-not-supported : 2 Time(s)

seems that i have a format-problembut where???

HEEELP!!

 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] samba and OSX issue

[Tom Brown]

Hi,

Does anyone know if there is a bug within Jaguar that makes its support for
smb a bit flakey?

We are having an issue where large files are timing out over the network -
these are mainly video based.

We have tried 2.2.5 and 2.2.8a but with the same result and windows does not
seem to have the same issue.

Can anyone confirm this please?

thanks


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Inherited Permissions vs Force/Create Mask

[Nils Kalchhauser]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:21:51 EST):
 ...
 It seems another approache could be to use force mask and create
 mask and force directory and create directory. 
 

we have quite a similar setup and the following mask directives:

create mask = 0775
directory mask = 0775

with these every new file is owned by the user who created it and belongs
to the group. the file is group writable and therefore all other users can
use it...


greetings,
Nils
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Re: Samba with winbind trouble

[leopardb]

LINDER Thierry wrote:

Hello,

I try to implement a samba server (2.2.7a) with the authentifiactions via winbind to a 
PDC W2000.
When I test winbind, it works:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -t
Secret is good
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -a tli%password
plaintext password authentication succeeded
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# 

I enable the winbind on the /etc/nsswitch.conf:

passwd: files winbind
shadow: files 
group:  files winbind

If I try to do a su to my user which is not declared in my /etc/passwd, it works fine:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# su - tli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$ 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$ 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$ id
uid=10061(tli) gid=1(Domain Users) groups=1(Domain Users),10062(PRJ - Gestion de projets),10058(KAM),10054(Team-Elargi),10018(IT Unix),10060(PRJ - Sharepoint),10053(testgrp)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$ 

Also, I assume that the winbind levell is OK.
But, If I try to open a share with smbclient, I can't:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbclient -L pxtest
added interface ip=172.30.1.167 bcast=172.30.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Password: 
Anonymous login successful
Domain=[UDITIS] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix]

   Sharename  Type  Comment
   -    ---
   test   Disk  Share de test pour les ACL's
   IPC$   IPC   IPC Service (Samba Server 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix + 
ACL's support)
   ADMIN$ Disk  IPC Service (Samba Server 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix + 
ACL's support)
   Server   Comment
   ----
   PXTEST   Samba Server 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix + ACL's 
   UDNEJ102 

   WorkgroupMaster
   ----
   UDITIS   UDNEJ102
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbclient //pxtest/tli -U tli
added interface ip=172.30.1.167 bcast=172.30.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Password: 
session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# 

Here is my smb.conf configuration file:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# cat smb.conf
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from udpexp07.uditis.ch (172.30.1.131)
# Date: 2003/11/21 10:22:37
# Global parameters
[global]
   workgroup = UDITIS
   netbios name = PXTEST
   server string = Samba Server %v + ACL's support
   security = DOMAIN
   encrypt passwords = No
   obey pam restrictions = Yes
   password server = udnej102.uditis.ch
   pam password change = Yes
   passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
   passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n 
*passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
   unix password sync = Yes
   log level = 2
   log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log
   max log size = 0
   socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
   preferred master = No
   local master = No
   domain master = No
   dns proxy = No
   winbind uid = 1-2
   winbind gid = 1-2
   template homedir = /home/test/%U
   template shell = /bin/bash
   winbind cache time = 0
   winbind use default domain = Yes
   guest account = Guest
   printing = cups
[homes]
   comment = Home Directories
   valid users = %S
   read only = No
   create mask = 0664
   directory mask = 0775
   browseable = No
[printers]
   comment = All Printers
   path = /var/spool/samba
   printable = Yes
   browseable = No
[test]
   comment = Share de test pour les ACL's
   path = /home/test
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# 

Thanks by advance to help me on this trouble, because I found nothing serious on the logs and I passed through alla my ideas ...

Many thanks

Thierry
--
Thierry Linder   Tél. central +41 (0)32 557 55 00
Mandataire CommercialMobile   +41 (0)79 473 92 35
Key Account Manager  Fax  +41 (0)32 557 55 05
Rue de la Gare 4   
CH 2034 Peseux (NE)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.uditis.ch 

 

Hi,
excuse my noob answer but did you alter your /etc/pam.d/* files ? 
there's some work to do in those. By the way, i'm in pretty much in the 
same situation, except for one thing : the output for my smbclient is :

added interface ip=128.0.107.2 bcast=128.0.107.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Password:
Domain=[FIRM] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.8a]
tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
although the password is correct...

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Re: Samba with winbind trouble

[Grosswiler Roger]

or use 'encrypt password = yes' as i read, the pam.d-things are just
needed if you don't submit your passwords encrypted. btw. all later
windows-clients (from nt4 on) just support encrypted password=yes. all
other should somehow fail in wrong password..

cheers,
Roger


 LINDER Thierry wrote:

Hello,

I try to implement a samba server (2.2.7a) with the authentifiactions via
 winbind to a PDC W2000.
When I test winbind, it works:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -t
Secret is good
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -a tli%password
plaintext password authentication succeeded
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]#

I enable the winbind on the /etc/nsswitch.conf:

passwd: files winbind
shadow: files
group:  files winbind

If I try to do a su to my user which is not declared in my /etc/passwd,
 it works fine:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# su - tli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$ id
uid=10061(tli) gid=1(Domain Users) groups=1(Domain
 Users),10062(PRJ - Gestion de
 projets),10058(KAM),10054(Team-Elargi),10018(IT Unix),10060(PRJ -
 Sharepoint),10053(testgrp)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$

Also, I assume that the winbind levell is OK.
But, If I try to open a share with smbclient, I can't:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbclient -L pxtest
added interface ip=172.30.1.167 bcast=172.30.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Password:
Anonymous login successful
Domain=[UDITIS] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix]

Sharename  Type  Comment
-    ---
test   Disk  Share de test pour les ACL's
IPC$   IPC   IPC Service (Samba Server
 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix + ACL's support)
ADMIN$ Disk  IPC Service (Samba Server
 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix + ACL's support)

Server   Comment
----
PXTEST   Samba Server 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix +
 ACL's
UDNEJ102

WorkgroupMaster
----
UDITIS   UDNEJ102
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbclient //pxtest/tli -U tli
added interface ip=172.30.1.167 bcast=172.30.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Password:
session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#

Here is my smb.conf configuration file:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# cat smb.conf
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from udpexp07.uditis.ch (172.30.1.131)
# Date: 2003/11/21 10:22:37

# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = UDITIS
netbios name = PXTEST
server string = Samba Server %v + ACL's support
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = No
obey pam restrictions = Yes
password server = udnej102.uditis.ch
pam password change = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n
 *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
unix password sync = Yes
log level = 2
log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log
max log size = 0
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
preferred master = No
local master = No
domain master = No
dns proxy = No
winbind uid = 1-2
winbind gid = 1-2
template homedir = /home/test/%U
template shell = /bin/bash
winbind cache time = 0
winbind use default domain = Yes
guest account = Guest
printing = cups

[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
read only = No
create mask = 0664
directory mask = 0775
browseable = No

[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
printable = Yes
browseable = No

[test]
comment = Share de test pour les ACL's
path = /home/test
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]#

Thanks by advance to help me on this trouble, because I found nothing
 serious on the logs and I passed through alla my ideas ...

Many thanks

Thierry
--

Thierry Linder   Tél. central +41 (0)32 557 55 00
Mandataire CommercialMobile   +41 (0)79 473 92 35
Key Account Manager  Fax  +41 (0)32 557 55 05
Rue de la Gare 4
CH 2034 Peseux (NE)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.uditis.ch



 Hi,
 excuse my noob answer but did you alter your /etc/pam.d/* files ?
 there's some work to do in those. By the way, i'm in pretty much in the
 same situation, except for one thing : the output for my smbclient is :

 added interface ip=128.0.107.2 bcast=128.0.107.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
 Password:
 Domain=[FIRM] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.8a]
 tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD

 although the password is correct...


 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  

RE: [Samba] RE: winbindd panic daemon dies

[ww m-pubsyssamba]

Hi, please find attatched the back trace from my winbindd (samba 3.0.0) panic,

thanks Andy Smith.

-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 November 2003 00:12
To: ww m-pubsyssamba
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] RE: winbindd panic daemon dies


On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 01:00, ww m-pubsyssamba wrote:
 Hi, 
 
   I haven't been able to work out how to capture the backtrace,
  I've installed winbind with debug compiled and also gdbm.

I hope you mean gdb - the GNU Debugger, not the database :-)

  I get the output shown below, what do I need to do next?

If you look in the manpage for smb.conf, you can setup a 'panic
action'.  This can do anything from popping up gdb in an xterm to
mailing you a backtrace.  

The example in the smb.conf is 

panic action = /bin/sleep 9

This makes winbind just hang in there, so you can attach the debugger

Then you can attach gdb in the normal way:

gdb /path/to/samba/winbind 2348

where 2348 is the pid of the near-dead winbindd.

Run 'bt full' and give us the result.

Andrew Bartlett
-- 
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net

BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which 
are not the views of the BBC unless specifically
stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy 
or disclose the information in any way nor act in
reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors 
e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.
(gdb) bt full
#0  0xfef9ebbc in _waitid () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
No symbol table info available.
#1  0xfef57e14 in _waitpid () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
No symbol table info available.
#2  0xfef937c8 in system () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
No symbol table info available.
#3  0xce46c in smb_panic (why=0x262598 internal error) at lib/util.c:1391
cmd = 0x358908 /bin/sleep 9
result = 16
#4  0xaa840 in fault_report (sig=10) at lib/fault.c:41
counter = 1
#5  0xaa8c4 in sig_fault (sig=10) at lib/fault.c:61
No locals.
#6  signal handler called
No symbol table info available.
#7  0xfef42f34 in _malloc_unlocked () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
No symbol table info available.
#8  0xfef42d9c in malloc () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
No symbol table info available.
#9  0xbb9fc in vasprintf (ptr=0xffbfd884, format=0x2641b8 %s%s%s:%d, 
ap=0xffbfd864) at lib/snprintf.c:854
ret = 102
ap2 = 0xffbfd864
---Type return to continue, or q return to quit---
#10 0xbbaa8 in asprintf (ptr=0xffbfd884, format=0x2641b8 %s%s%s:%d)
at lib/snprintf.c:874
ap = 0xffbfd864
ret = 182
#11 0xc290c in ipstr_list_add (ipstr_list=0xffbfd994, service=0x321de0)
at lib/util_str.c:1671
new_ipstr = 0x0
#12 0xc2a20 in ipstr_list_make (ipstr_list=0xffbfd994, ip_list=0x321db8, 
ip_count=88) at lib/util_str.c:1703
i = 5
#13 0x13f118 in namecache_store (name=0xffbfe320 national.core.bbc.co.uk, 
name_type=28, num_names=88, ip_list=0x321db8) at libsmb/namecache.c:148
expiry = 1069410722
key = 0x358020 NBT/NATIONAL.CORE.BBC.CO.UK#1C
value_string = 0x337100 
172.20.160.253:389,172.20.68.215:389,10.152.7.10:389,132.185.48.87:389,10.162.8.2:389
i = 175376400
ret = 3383735
#14 0x149930 in internal_resolve_name (
name=0xffbfe320 national.core.bbc.co.uk, name_type=28, 
return_iplist=0xffbfe720, return_count=0xffbfe728, 
resolve_order=0x27aff8 hosts) at libsmb/namequery.c:1093
name_resolve_list = 
hosts\000o\002uk\000À\f\000!\000\001\000\000\002X\0---Type return to continue, or q 
return to quit---
00.\000\000\000 
\000\000\000\000\203\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\n\000\000\000\000ÿ¿Ûôÿ!î\024ÿ 
{Ð\000\000\000\000\0003Z\bÿ¿Ü`ÿ¿ÜX~þþÿ\201\001\001\000\000\000ÿ\000\000\000\002Cÿ¿Ý\224ÿ¿Þ\024ÿ¿Þ\224ÿ¿Ûø\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\022þûÀ\000\000\000\002Cþûò¨\000\000\000\000ÿ¿Þ\020ÿ¿Ý\220\000\000\000\000ÿ¿Ü\230\000\000\000\003\000\000
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]@\000\000\0002\000\000\000\006...
tok = hosts, '\000' repeats 11 times, 
þü\025 þü\025¤þü\025\220þü\025\224ÿÿëÿ\000\000\000\017þûüTÿ¿ç\030, '\000' repeats 
19 times, \003\000\000\000u, '\000' repeats 11 times, 
\003\000\000\000\000ÿ¿á²þûüS\000\000\000\nþü\025Ð\177ÿÿÿþü\025\234, '\000' repeats 
16 times, þü\025 \000\000\000\000\0005\214\eþü\025\224ÿÿëÿþûü?þûüT\001\000\000\002, 
'\000' repeats 19 times, \003\000\000\000d, '\000' repeats 11 times, 
\003\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\003o\002uk\000\000\000\003!\000\001\000\000\002X\000.\000\000\000d\000X...
ptr = 0xffbfdb45 
allones = 0
allzeros = 0
is_address = 0
result = 1
  

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and the HP PSC 750 printer (printingover cups)

[Stefan . Iven]

This could be a possibility. how do i change this? what makes me wonder a
little bit, is that i just cannot print via the samba (smb-protocol). but
locally it works finebut perhaps your workaround helps me...which
driver did you take for your psc750? i am using the hpjis-driver


in smb.conf :

use for the printing :

print command = lpr -r -oraw -P%p %s

I use Suse, ther I don't need to make changes in the files mime.confs and
mime.types.
I've often read, that have to make changes there :

in mime.convs uncomment
application/octet-stream   application/vnd.cups-raw0

in mime.types uncomment
application/octet-stream

This doesn't mean, that you now con only use raw printing. It means that
you now ables to
use raw printing as well as cups printing.

I use the latest drivers for 750CP from HP.

Hope it will help

Stefan
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] Re: Samba with winbind trouble

[LINDER Thierry]

Hello Roger,

Thanks for your note. I agree with you, I've changed the settings of the smb.conf:

from: encrypt passwords = No
to:  encrypt passwords = Yes

Now, I've still a trouble, but the error message has changed:

Before:
session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE

after:
tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD

Any ideas ?

Thierry
--

Thierry Linder   Tél. central +41 (0)32 557 55 00
Mandataire CommercialMobile   +41 (0)79 473 92 35
Key Account Manager  Fax  +41 (0)32 557 55 05
Rue de la Gare 4   
CH 2034 Peseux (NE)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.uditis.ch 



-Original Message-
From: Grosswiler Roger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: vendredi, 21. novembre 2003 11:12
To: leopardb
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: Samba with winbind trouble


or use 'encrypt password = yes' as i read, the pam.d-things are just needed if you 
don't submit your passwords encrypted. btw. all later windows-clients (from nt4 on) 
just support encrypted password=yes. all other should somehow fail in wrong password..

cheers,
Roger


 LINDER Thierry wrote:

Hello,

I try to implement a samba server (2.2.7a) with the authentifiactions 
via  winbind to a PDC W2000. When I test winbind, it works:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -t
Secret is good
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -a tli%password
plaintext password authentication succeeded
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]#

I enable the winbind on the /etc/nsswitch.conf:

passwd: files winbind
shadow: files
group:  files winbind

If I try to do a su to my user which is not declared in my 
/etc/passwd,  it works fine:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# su - tli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$ id
uid=10061(tli) gid=1(Domain Users) groups=1(Domain  
Users),10062(PRJ - Gestion de  
projets),10058(KAM),10054(Team-Elargi),10018(IT Unix),10060(PRJ -
 Sharepoint),10053(testgrp)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$

Also, I assume that the winbind levell is OK.
But, If I try to open a share with smbclient, I can't:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbclient -L pxtest
added interface ip=172.30.1.167 bcast=172.30.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Password:
Anonymous login successful
Domain=[UDITIS] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix]

Sharename  Type  Comment
-    ---
test   Disk  Share de test pour les ACL's
IPC$   IPC   IPC Service (Samba Server
 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix + ACL's support)
ADMIN$ Disk  IPC Service (Samba Server
 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix + ACL's support)

Server   Comment
----
PXTEST   Samba Server 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix +
 ACL's
UDNEJ102

WorkgroupMaster
----
UDITIS   UDNEJ102
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbclient //pxtest/tli -U tli
added interface ip=172.30.1.167 bcast=172.30.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Password:
session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#

Here is my smb.conf configuration file:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# cat smb.conf
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from udpexp07.uditis.ch (172.30.1.131)
# Date: 2003/11/21 10:22:37

# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = UDITIS
netbios name = PXTEST
server string = Samba Server %v + ACL's support
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = No
obey pam restrictions = Yes
password server = udnej102.uditis.ch
pam password change = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n
 *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
unix password sync = Yes
log level = 2
log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log
max log size = 0
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
preferred master = No
local master = No
domain master = No
dns proxy = No
winbind uid = 1-2
winbind gid = 1-2
template homedir = /home/test/%U
template shell = /bin/bash
winbind cache time = 0
winbind use default domain = Yes
guest account = Guest
printing = cups

[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
read only = No
create mask = 0664
directory mask = 0775
browseable = No

[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
printable = Yes
browseable = No

[test]
comment = Share de test pour les ACL's
path = /home/test
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]#

Thanks by advance to help me on this trouble, because I found nothing  
serious on the logs and I 

[Samba] Printing to Intel InBusiness Print Station from SAMBA

[Artyom Viklenko]

Hi, all!

Does any body use this print station?
I try print via smbspool or smbclient and every time
I got access denyed error.
# smbspool smb://ps786fba/Printer1 101 artem Test 1 - test.txt
ERROR: ERRSRV - ERRaccess opening remote file Test
#
PIGGY$ smbclient //ps786fba/Printer1 -P
added interface ip=192.168.9.250 bcast=192.168.9.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Got a positive name query response from 192.168.9.254 ( 192.168.16.251 )
Password:
smb: \ put test.txt
ERRSRV - ERRaccess (The requester does not have  the  necessary  access  rights 
 within  the specified  context for the requested function. The context is 
defined by the TID or the UID.) opening remote file \test.txt



--
Artyom
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] Re: Samba with winbind trouble

[Grosswiler Roger]

as you have been on pam.d before, check in your smbpasswd-file wheather
the user you want to auth exists. if no, add it with smbpasswd -a [user]

salut,
Roger
 Hello Roger,

 Thanks for your note. I agree with you, I've changed the settings of the
 smb.conf:

 from: encrypt passwords = No
 to:  encrypt passwords = Yes

 Now, I've still a trouble, but the error message has changed:

 Before:
 session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE

 after:
 tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD

 Any ideas ?

 Thierry
 --

 Thierry Linder   Tél. central +41 (0)32 557 55 00
 Mandataire CommercialMobile   +41 (0)79 473 92 35
 Key Account Manager  Fax  +41 (0)32 557 55 05
 Rue de la Gare 4
 CH 2034 Peseux (NE)
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.uditis.ch



 -Original Message-
 From: Grosswiler Roger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: vendredi, 21. novembre 2003 11:12
 To: leopardb
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: Samba with winbind trouble


 or use 'encrypt password = yes' as i read, the pam.d-things are just
 needed if you don't submit your passwords encrypted. btw. all later
 windows-clients (from nt4 on) just support encrypted password=yes. all
 other should somehow fail in wrong password..

 cheers,
 Roger


 LINDER Thierry wrote:

Hello,

I try to implement a samba server (2.2.7a) with the authentifiactions
via  winbind to a PDC W2000. When I test winbind, it works:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -t
Secret is good
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -a tli%password
plaintext password authentication succeeded
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]#

I enable the winbind on the /etc/nsswitch.conf:

passwd: files winbind
shadow: files
group:  files winbind

If I try to do a su to my user which is not declared in my
/etc/passwd,  it works fine:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# su - tli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$ id
uid=10061(tli) gid=1(Domain Users) groups=1(Domain
Users),10062(PRJ - Gestion de
projets),10058(KAM),10054(Team-Elargi),10018(IT Unix),10060(PRJ -
 Sharepoint),10053(testgrp)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$

Also, I assume that the winbind levell is OK.
But, If I try to open a share with smbclient, I can't:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbclient -L pxtest
added interface ip=172.30.1.167 bcast=172.30.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Password:
Anonymous login successful
Domain=[UDITIS] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix]

Sharename  Type  Comment
-    ---
test   Disk  Share de test pour les ACL's
IPC$   IPC   IPC Service (Samba Server
 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix + ACL's support)
ADMIN$ Disk  IPC Service (Samba Server
 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix + ACL's support)

Server   Comment
----
PXTEST   Samba Server 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix +
 ACL's
UDNEJ102

WorkgroupMaster
----
UDITIS   UDNEJ102
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbclient //pxtest/tli -U tli
added interface ip=172.30.1.167 bcast=172.30.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Password:
session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#

Here is my smb.conf configuration file:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# cat smb.conf
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from udpexp07.uditis.ch (172.30.1.131)
# Date: 2003/11/21 10:22:37

# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = UDITIS
netbios name = PXTEST
server string = Samba Server %v + ACL's support
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = No
obey pam restrictions = Yes
password server = udnej102.uditis.ch
pam password change = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n
 *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
unix password sync = Yes
log level = 2
log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log
max log size = 0
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
preferred master = No
local master = No
domain master = No
dns proxy = No
winbind uid = 1-2
winbind gid = 1-2
template homedir = /home/test/%U
template shell = /bin/bash
winbind cache time = 0
winbind use default domain = Yes
guest account = Guest
printing = cups

[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
read only = No
create mask = 0664
directory mask = 0775
browseable = No

[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
printable = Yes
browseable = No

[test]
comment = Share de test pour 

[Samba] --with-pam and --with-pam_smbpass

[Beast]

Hi all,

What is with-pam and with-pam_smbpass means?
I'm using ldap based authentication (via nss_ldap) and i need ldap
backend in samba, should i build using with-pam option? what is the
impact if i did not build with-pam support?

Tks.
  


--beast

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] SAMBA3 and WINS problem

[Giovanni Romanenghi]

I install samba3 on solaris8 and I configure the PDC support and WINS 
support. The PDC work without problems but the wins doesn't work.
When I try to resolv netbios name from windows client on other lan the 
wins doesn't work.

I want trust my domain samba3 with a windows2k domain ( mixed mode)  
which is on another network.  When I trust from windows2k to samba3 it 
works but when I trust from samba3 to windows2k (/ with net rpc trustdom 
establish win2k/ ) doesn't trust because samba3 doesn't resolv the 
netbios name win2k.

In my smb.conf file i have the wins support = yes.

I try the command /nmblookup win2k/ but I receive the error can't 
resolv on my network the name win2k.

Any ideas? 
Ciao Giovanni
P.S. In attach my smb.conf
# Global parameters
[global]
# Parte netbios
workgroup = HYSTORIADOM
netbios name = HYSTORIA
server string = DOMINIO HYSTORIA TEST
wins support = Yes
#
# NETWORKING e TUNING
#
interfaces = 10.10.5.156
bind interfaces only = yes
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
wide links = no
log level = 0
#
# PDC
#
preferred master = Yes
domain master = Yes
domain logons = yes
local master = yes
encrypt passwords = yes
security = user
time server = yes
#
# Parte LDAP
#
ldap suffix = dc=sorint,c=it
ldap machine suffix = ou=people
ldap user suffix = ou=people
ldap group suffix = ou=group
ldap admin dn = uid=sambauser,cn=config
ldap ssl = no
ldap delete dn =  yes
#
# Parte Password e Sicurezza
#
passdb backend =  ldapsam:ldap://localhost/ guest
passwd program = /sambabin/samba/bin/ldapsync.pl -o %u
passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n *modifying*   
 unix password sync = Yes
min password length = 5
admin users = @rd
#
# Profile
#
logon script = %G_%U.bat %G %U
logon home =
logon path =
#
# WINBIND
#
winbind uid = 5-6
winbind gid = 1-2
winbind enum users = yes
winbind enum groups = yes
winbind use default domain = Yes
winbind cache time = 50
 
[netlogon]
path = /home/netlogon
comment = Netlogon
read only = yes
 
[home]
comment = Cartelle Personali
path = /home/home
read only = No
create mask = 0777
directory mask = 0777
inherit acls = yes
vfs object = recycle
recycle: repository = .recycle
recycle: version=True
recycle: touch=True
recycle: keeptree=True
recycle: noversion = *.doc|*.xls|*.ppt
recycle: exclude = *.tmp *.temp *.cache
recycle: maxsize = 0

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] rejected the session for name *SMBSERVER

[Stefan . Iven]

Hello List,

I found the following entry in my logmessage from a Samba3 server:


Nov 21 12:07:42 ibvbfs1 smbd[2119]: [2003/11/21 12:07:42, 0]
libsmb/cliconnect.c:attempt_netbios_session_request(1460)
Nov 21 12:07:42 ibvbfs1 smbd[2119]:   attempt_netbios_session_request:
WS103 rejected the session for name *SMBSERVER with error Not listening on
called name
Nov 21 12:07:42 ibvbfs1 smbd[2119]: [2003/11/21 12:07:42, 0]
rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(2595)
Nov 21 12:07:42 ibvbfs1 smbd[2119]:   spoolss_connect_to_client: machine
WS103 rejected the NetBIOS session request.


I think it means the the worstation ws103 waits/listen for an other SMB
server. Normaly the Sambaserver wich is called FS1 (the netbiosname)
It seems to me that this happens if ws103 trys to browse printers, because
spools is from printers, isn't it?

Are I'm right? What is wrong? Can someone explain this to me?

Greetings

Stefan
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Starting with Samba - first impressions

[Todd O'Bryan]

So the SWAT thing is not just me. Several people have written with this  
same problem over the past few weeks and if anyone has solved it they  
haven't sent the solution to the list.

I wish someone in the know who has an hour to kill (OK, I realize I've  
just described the empty set.) would install RH9 and go from a clean  
install to getting SWAT to work and document what they did. Clearly,  
one cannot follow the How-To's anywhere and have this work. And most of  
us who are having the problem are clueless enough that we don't know  
what to do next if the directions get followed and the results don't  
happen as expected.

Todd

On Nov 21, 2003, at 1:00 AM, Fran Fabrizio wrote:

I promised John yesterday that I would document my experiences as I  
tried to convert this ugly two-headed network I've inherited (see  
thread titled Having Samba integrate/replace existing mixed  
Unix/Windows network from yesterday) into an easy-to-manage  
Samba-based network.  I took the first baby steps and I thought that  
it would be interesting/useful to post semi-regularly here so that  
those of you who are also looking to get started with Samba can see  
what someone else is going through, and those of you who are so close  
to the project that you might take some things for granted can see  
some of the issues that one user is dealing with. :-)  If this isn't  
useful for anyone, I'll stop sending them. Anyhow, here's day one

--- 

Day 1 - Creating a testbed, installing Samba, and a quick  
proof-of-concept

I've decided that for my testbed I would use a laptop running linux as  
my Samba server, and I would use VMWare to put an instance of Win XP  
Pro as my client.  This way, I have a self-contained Samba network in  
a laptop that can travel with me and does not rely on any network  
connectivity to develop the Samba environment.  I thought this would  
be an easy part but one of the Redhat 9 ISOs that I downloaded from  
linuxiso had a corrupted package (disk 2, the xpdf package - two  
separate downloads, two separate burns on two different computers, and  
both had the same flaw), followed by one XP Pro VMWare install hang in  
the middle.  As a result, it was nearly 5pm before I had the OSes  
installed correctly and was ready to download Samba.

Hopped onto samba.org and downloaded the 3.0.0 source.  Before  
unpacking, I removed all Redhat RPMs for samba.  I then proceeded to  
follow the instructions in the Using Samba book to do my config and  
install.  Knowing that down the road I wanted to play with all sorts  
of authentication options, I chose to configure Samba with PAM, LDAP,  
NIS+ as well as smbwrapper and smbmount and automount and syslog.   
Configuration and build went fine, except it took forever (maybe 30  
minutes) on the laptop so I hope I don't have to do this too often.   
Install went fine.

I followed the book and created a small smb.conf that simply creates a  
share called test (/usr/local/samba/tmp).  I dropped a test file in  
there.  I then tried to see how the same thing would look from  
SWAT

Bump #1.  I followed the book.  I checked /etc/services for the swat  
entry (it was there already).  I then added a swat file to  
/etc/xinetd.d/ directory as per the book.  /bin/kill -HUP -a xinetd.   
Logs show that it restarted ok.  Open browser, go to  
http://localhost:901/, it spins for a while, then connection refused.   
Try again, connection refused.  Double-check all files, notice that  
the path the book had me enter (/usr/local/samba/bin/swat) is wrong -  
it's /usr/local/samba/sbin/swat.  Fix this, try again, connection  
refused.  Send more HUP signals to xinetd, nothing seems to work.   
netstat doesn't indicate anything listening on port 901.  I never did  
get Swat running but I am a text config kind of guy anyhow and I was  
anxious to get on, so I put it aside for another day after about 15  
minutes and a coupel of fruitless google searches.

I fired up the daemons and they started fine.  I did an smbclient -U%  
-L localhost a few times, the test share was listed, everything looked  
just like the book said it would except (Bump #2) where it says  
Master next to Workgroup it was always blank.  This was  
disconcerting but I decided to press on.  (About 10 minutes later I  
tried it again, and it was now listed as the laptop's name.  I guess  
it just takes a while to make itself known)

The book suggested that I create a user on the Windows client  
specifically for testing, so I created a user/pass of samba/samba.  I  
then remembered to go back to the Samba server and add this with  
smbpasswd (I guess this is what is referred to as the matching  
encrypted passwords issue).  I hit Bump #3 here.  I would try  
smbpasswd -a samba, enter in the password, and it would tell me that  
it failed to initialise a SAM_ACCOUNT.  After about 5 tries of this, I  
googled again, and learned 

[Samba] Samba3 and Domain Admin group mapping and use pbms.

[Jrme Fenal]

Bon appétit à tous,

I have a small problem regarding delegation of domain administrator 
rights to a 'normal' user (eg. not root or uid!=0).

I maybe fooled myself believing it is possible in Samba3, reading 
Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html#WKURIDS, that a user could be also a domain 
admin.

I've created group mappings (with good RIDs) for main groups (eg. 
SID-512, SID-513, SID-514, even tested SID-544, SID-548) and associated 
my user `jerome' to SID-512, the domadmin group.

Then, with that user connected on freshly inserted XP workstation, I've 
tried to launch MS usermgr.exe to manage users. It used to work when my 
user jerome was in the [global] `admin users=' clause, but no more now.

I have the following messages in the log. Since I don't know what is 
ACE, I can't go further, and asking (once again) for help :

[2003/11/21 12:16:06, 5] 
rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:access_check_samr_function(106)
  _samr_open_group: access check ((granted: 0x00020381;  required: 
0x0200)
[2003/11/21 12:16:06, 10] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(234)
  se_access_check: requested access 0x001f, for NT token with 7 
entries and first sid S-1-5-21-1150874807-1180408084-x-3000.
[2003/11/21 12:16:06, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(251)
[2003/11/21 12:16:06, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(252)
  se_access_check: user sid is 
S-1-5-21-1150874807-1180408084-429402335-3000
  se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-1150874807-1180408084-x-2027
  se_access_check: also S-1-1-0
  se_access_check: also S-1-5-2
  se_access_check: also S-1-5-11
  se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-1150874807-1180408084-x-513
  se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-1150874807-1180408084-x-512
  se_access_check: ACE 0: type 0, flags = 0x00, SID = S-1-1-0 mask = 
20011, current desired = 1f
  se_access_check: ACE 1: type 0, flags = 0x00, SID = S-1-5-32-544 mask 
= f001f, current desired = e
  se_access_check: ACE 2: type 0, flags = 0x00, SID = S-1-5-32-548 mask 
= f001f, current desired = e
[2003/11/21 12:16:06, 5] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(315)
  se_access_check: access (1f) denied.
[2003/11/21 12:16:06, 2] 
rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:access_check_samr_object(93)
  _samr_open_group: ACCESS DENIED  (requested: 0x001f)

My questions :
- Am I really fooling me in believing it is possible ?
- Am I stuck to using 'admin user=too,many,users,here,mapped,to,root' ?
- What is the sambaGroupType in LDAP (I noticed that 2 is domain group, 
5 is buitin) ? What are other values ?
- Are builtins cited at Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html#WKURIDS really groups ?
- Are they useable for a user as it seems se_access_check looks for it ?
- Should I rebuild first my config with TDBSAM (as advised in Chapter 
12, #id2895268) then migrate it to LDAP ?

My setup (same as last time) :
- Samba 3.0.1pre3 (RPM home recompiled from samba.org SRPM);
- OpenLDAP 2.0.27 (stock RH9) + Solaris RootDSE patch, all on RH9;
- Two LDAP servers (one master, one slave, replication of all the base);
- Samba setup as PDC + BDC, using Samba3 LDAP schema.
Best, best regards,

Jérôme

--
Jérôme Fenal - Consultant Unix/SAN/Logiciel Libre
Groupe Expert  Managed Services - LogicaCMG France
http://www.logicacmg.com/fr/ - mailto:jerome.fenal AT logicacmg.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] Samba vs DHCP

[Wolfgang Wagner]

 From: AVMEJIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 I was using a Samba server under a SUNOS 5.5.1 operative system. This
 SUN machine was the server of a number of Lynux (Mandrake) and Windows
 (95,98, XP) computers in a TCP/IP network with fixed IP numbers. We were
 oblied to change to DHCP recently. As our network has a huge number of
 computers I am running the smbd and nmbd daemos of the Samba with an
 identification in such a way that only those windows  computers having
 the WINS protocolo with the same identification were able 'to see' this
 machine. 

OK, up to this point I understand your situation. Please post the part of 
the smb.conf, in which you restricts te visibility of samba.

 Under DHCP, at least for Windows 98, there is no any
 configuration for this protocol in such a way that now although my
 subnetwork is transparent for all SUN and Lynux systems, those Windows
 98 working under DHCP are not able to recognize the Samba server.

Here is asomething, I do not understand.
Why cannot see the Win98-Clients the Samba-server? 
Which DHCP-Server and which DHCP-Config do you use? 

 Obviously there is a trivial solution, I could eliminate the
 identification in the daemon of the Samba server but the 
 price to pay is

Again, in which way had you realised this identification?

 being transaparent for all the computers on my network (more than four
 thousand), 

Four thousand computers on one single network???
No routers between departements? No chance to filter 
traffic? One single flat network??

 I assume there should be some way in the configuration of
 Samba to allow a particular internet address to access the Samba server
 although it is not able to see it, due to the identification. Does
 anybody know how to do it? Thanks in Advance. Alfredo

I think, this is a DHCP-Problem, but I am incapable of understanding
your problem, because the lack of information.


Mit freundlichen Grüßen


Wolfgang Wagner
--
Systemadministration
Riwa GmbH, Zwingerstraße 1, 87435 Kempten, +49-831-52 29 63-537
eMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Inherited Permissions vs Force/Create Mask

[Edd Payne]

This may be the setup that you have at present, but I have a share with the 
following set:

[sharename]
   path = /path/to/share
   writeable = yes
   valid users = @group
   force group = group
   directory mode = 770
   create mask = 660

Then do

# chown anyuser.groupname /path/to/share
# chmod 770 /path/to/share

Add all the users to the same group, and then any user who writes to the share 
will have their name as the owner of the file, and the group will be the 
group owner, and the permissions will allow full control of the file 
(-rw-rw).

We have a share for each department at work here, and this seems to be working 
file for all of them - however our needs aren't as intense as yours so this 
may not be the best setup - however it does seem to work quite well so far.

Hope this is of some use,
edd

On Thursday 20 Nov 2003 8:21 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have written to this list several times. I purchased the Officia SAMBA 3
 How-To and Reference Guide (and read much of it). But I can't get a good
 answer to my question.

 I'm trying to figure out the difference between inherited permissions and
 force/create mask/directory, and other actions like force user and
 force group (it seems I don't want to use the latter).

 I have a very simple requirement. I have 6 users in a small network of
 Windows XP video editing workstations. All users must be able to read and
 write to the same shared directory (reading, modifying, and deleting each
 other's files). Plus, I want to know who wrote each file that's on the
 system (who is the true owner).

 Because I am doing video editing -- sometimes with uncompressed video over
 a gigabit network (18 MB/sec)  -- I need the very highest efficiency. So,
 whatever solution I choose it can't have a negative impact on speed.

 So far I have been able to solve my problem more or less by using
 Inherited Permissions = yes in my smb.conf file under my shared directory
 name. Is this the best way to do it? Or are there better solutions?

 Here are the facts about my system.

 -- Each user has a username and password on my Linux system.
 -- Each user has the same username and password under Samba
 -- Each user logs onto his/her Windows machine with the same usernames and
 passwords that they have in Linux.
 -- The Shared Directory on my Linux machine is owned by the group to which
 all users belong, and the group has write permission  (rwxrw-r--)
 -- The umask for the Linux user that created the directory is 0002

 With the solution I have chosen (inherited permissions = yes), all files
 and folders that my 6 users create and write into the shared directory are
 listed as being owned by the person who created them (that's good) and by
 the group to which they all belong (that's good) and the group has read and
 write permissions.

 However, in Windows XP, group members who didn't originally create a file
 or directory are not listed as having FULL CONTROL. They have read and
 write permission, but not modify. I'm not sure it makes any difference in
 the end because all users seem to be able to change the names of files,
 read them and delete them. But maybe they solution I'm using isn't good or
 has a high impact on performance?

 It seems another approache could be to use force mask and create mask
 and force directory and create directory.

 And as I said above, another approach would be to force user and force
 group -- but that doesn't preserve the information about who actually
 created the file. And I want to keep that if possible.

 And maybe there's a solution that doesn't involve using any special
 smb.conf variables.

 Some guidance would be appreciated. Thanks.

 Andy Liebman

-- 
Edd Payne
IT Co-ordinator
University of London Union
Malet Street, London WC1E 7HY

tel: 020 7664 2060
fax: 020 7436 4604

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Groups and LDAP

[Beast]

Friday, November 21, 2003, 5:44:54 AM, Robert wrote:

 I think I understand.  So, if I want a user (in LDAP) to be a part of 
 your ntadmins group, I'd set his gidNumber to 1000, correct?  Would I 
 also need to add a memberUid field in the ntadmins group for this user? 
   IE for user bob:
 dn: cn=ntadmins,ou=Groups,dc=firerun,dc=net
 cn: ntadmins
 objectClass: top
 objectClass: posixGroup
 gidNumber: 1000
 memberUid: root
 memberUid: patrick
 memberUid: bob

 Can an LDAP user have a gidNumber of 0 and be a root user on a Unix machine?

It depends. if that host is using ldap as auth server, yes. If not
then it has no effect.
Try using 'id username' to see all groups id for that username.


 Rob



--beast 

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] McAfee module for samba-vscan

[Arturo Busleiman]

I wrote this for a customer... here's a resume:

McAfee Antivirus via McDaemon for Samba-Vscan (samba-uvscan module)
by Arturo Buanzo Busleiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Published by intraRedes [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The samba-uvscan module allows a Samba share to analyze files located in
it in search of virii. This analysis is performed by McAfee's uvscan by a
middleware application called mcDaemon which implements simple preforking
and load balancing of uvscan processes, to speed up a bit the response
time of samba-uvscan. Of course, it does not accelerate uvscan scans
itself, it just provides a method to utilize an uvscan license for Unix on
Samba shares, giving the administrator time to migrate to a native
solution.

http://www.buanzo.com.ar/files/samba-2.2.8a-mcDaemon-intraRedes.tar.bz2

http://www.intraredes.com/projects/download/samba-2.2.8a-mcDaemon-intraRedes.tar.bz2

-- 
Arturo   Busleiman   -  [ i n t r a R e d e s   s r l ]
Piedras 264 - 2 A (C1070AAF) - Buenos Aires - ARGENTINA
Te.: (54 11) 4342-0049   -   http://www.intraredes.com/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] ACL doesn't inherit permissions

[Jean-Rene Cormier]

Hi, I'm currently using Samba 2.2.8a and when I try to set some
permissions on a directory from Windows, Samba only adds the permission
to the directory itself and not the sub-directories. Is there a way to
make Samba set the permissions on the sub directories also?

Thanks

Jean-Rene Cormier


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Re: smbclient ls error: NT_STATUS_PATH_NOT_COVERED

[Allan Peda]

Hi everyone:

I'd appreciate any help here...  Using smbclient I can change into a
directory within a DFS share, but when I attempt to list it's contents,
I receive the subject error.  I can view the directory (folder) from a
win client using the same credentials.

I already posted much of my configuration, sans the smb.conf, although
if anyone suspects that there are configuration problems then I will
gladly follow up with that information.

A quick capture of the smbclient problem is below.  This is a self
compiled version, and I removed the previously installed binary (so no
conflicts).

[EMAIL PROTECTED] bioinfo]$ smbclient -d1 -A ~/.smbcred -I 129.85.1.211
//rockefeller.edu/genearray
[2003/11/20 05:45:41, 1] client/client.c:do_connect(2598)
  Domain=[ROCKEFELLERNT] OS=[Windows Server 2003 3790] Server=[Windows
Server 2003 3790]
smb: \ cd Test Lab
smb: \Test Lab\ pwd
Current directory is \\rockefeller.edu\genearray\Test Lab\
smb: \Test Lab\ ls
NT_STATUS_PATH_NOT_COVERED listing \Test Lab\*

53607 blocks of size 524288. 44261 blocks available
smb: \Test Lab\ quit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bioinfo]$ smbclient -V
Version 3.0.0

-- 
Allan Peda

Programmer, Gene Array Resource Center
Rockefeller University
Box 203
1230 York Ave
New York, NY 10021-6399

(tel) 212-327-7064
(fax) 212-327-7065

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Winbindd and SSH (just disconnects after login)

[sambalists]

It looks like I've gotten the majority of things working in regards to
Winbind.  Users are being authenticated by the NT4 PDC when connecting to
shares, but I can't seem to get things set up correctly to allow logging in
via SSH(OpenSSH_3.6.1p2, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090702f).  It
appears as though I'm successfully authenticated by the PDC, but then the
connection is immediately closed.

(I'm running Mandrake Linux v9.2 and Samba Version 3.0.1pre3.)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] testuser]$ ssh -lTESTDOM.COM\\testuser linuxsmb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
Last login: Fri Nov 21 08:40:09 2003 from linuxsmb.TESTDOM.COM
Connection to linuxsmb closed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] testuser]$ ssh -lTESTDOM.COM\\testuser linuxsmb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
Last login: Fri Nov 21 08:40:44 2003 from linuxsmb.TESTDOM.COM
Connection to linuxsmb closed.
Here you can see by the Last Login: that is displayed, that I am being
authenticated when I try connecting via ssh 2 times back to back:

Here's a smbclient session being authenticated via the NT PDC:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] testuser]$ smbclient
//linuxsmb/testuser -UTESTDOM.COM\\testuser -c 'ls *.txt'
Password:

  SSD55287.txt 41401  Fri Nov  7 04:36:57 2003
  New Text Document.txt   A0  Thu Nov 20 15:08:26 2003

64860 blocks of size 32768. 63759 blocks available

So it appears that things are working ??

When I try connecting via SSH, no dice.  *sigh*

Here's a snippet from my /var/log/auth.log
Nov 21 08:34:52 linuxsmb pam_winbind[2842]: request failed: Wrong Password,
PAM error was 7, NT error was NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
Nov 21 08:34:52 linuxsmb pam_winbind[2842]: user `TESTDOM.COM\testuser'
denied access (incorrect password)
Nov 21 08:34:52 linuxsmb sshd(pam_unix)[2842]: check pass; user unknown
Nov 21 08:34:52 linuxsmb sshd(pam_unix)[2842]: authentication failure;
logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=NODEVssh ruser= rhost=linuxsmb.TESTDOM.COM
Nov 21 08:34:57 linuxsmb pam_winbind[2842]: user 'TESTDOM.COM\testuser'
granted acces
Nov 21 08:34:57 linuxsmb pam_winbind[2842]: user 'TESTDOM.COM\testuser'
granted acces
Nov 21 08:34:57 linuxsmb sshd[2842]: Accepted password for
TESTDOM.COM\\testuser from 198.246.197.240 port 32810 ssh2

/etc/pam.d/sshd
auth   required pam_nologin.so
auth   sufficient   pam_winbind.so
auth   required pam_unix.so use_first_pass shadow
auth   required pam_env.so # [1]

accountsufficient   pam_winbind.so
accountrequired pam_unix.so use_first_pass

sessionsufficient   pam_mkhomedir.so skel=/etc/skel umask=0022
sessionrequired pam_unix.so
sessionoptional pam_lastlog.so # [1]
sessionoptional pam_motd.so # [1]
sessionoptional pam_mail.so standard noenv # [1]
sessionrequired pam_limits.so

password   required pam_unix.so

What am I missing here or doing wrong?  Not sure if any other settings are
relevant, and hate blasting the list with a bunch of useless/unwanted text.

Any help/suggestions/insight would be greatly appreciated

Best Regards,
-=tim



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] tracking user actions

[Greg Whynott]

Eric, et al.

We have been able to identify the user moving folders around, thanks to
the help provided from the list.

Thanks for the help folks,

greg


-- 
UNIX is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] samba 3.0.0 freebsd

[Aaron Collins]

Matt Pusateri wrote:

Aaron,

I see that no one has posted a response to this.  I have a similar problem.  I think that the NSSwitch code is not complete, so it only works redirecting to LDAP and not winbind. Are you using LDAP?  What about /usr/ports/net/nss_ldap port?  
 

Matt, you are correct, the nsswitch code was not complete,  I took the 
old ports patch an applied it to the new 3.0 and it seems to work now, 
please refer to samba bug 797 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=797
Their is also a symlink the needs to be created

root# *ln -s /usr/lib/libnss_winbind.so /usr/lib/libnss_winbind.so.1*
root# *ln -s /usr/lib/libnss_winbind.so /usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.1*
root# *ln -s /usr/lib/libnss_winbind.so /usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.2*

Although I am not sure of this because their is a document at www.bzerk.org that details FreeBSD 5.1 with Samba 2.2.8a in MS AD environment that sounds like it works.  
Have you asked this on FreeBSD-Questions?  
 

I had a look at Bzerk, which is what inspired me to look at the old 
ports patches

I have been playing with several FreeBSD/Samba combinations but haven't found the one I want yet.

FYI - I didn't respond to the list, because I didn't want to express opinions that might not be accurate.

Let me know if I can help at all, although it seems that we are both stuck at similar levels of configuration.
 

I've got it working great now, please try the patch in the above samba 
bug report.  Im sure if enough people use it and find it useful it will 
get added.  I didn't specify in the bug report, but that diff was from 
samba 3.0.1pre4 (CVS Curret)

Thanks,



Matt Pusateri
Systems Administrator
Interactive Medical Systems, Inc.
 

Aaron Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/20/03 12:41AM 
   

Has anyone at all gotten the Samab 3.0 to integrate into the FreeBSD 5.1 
Name Service switcher?  Are there patches avaliable?  Does anyone know 
where to get the FreeBSD nss api so I can try to fix the code my self?  
I keep getting the following errors in my logs
NSSWITCH(nss_method_lookup): winbind, passwd, getpwnam_r, not found

 



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba with winbind trouble

[John H Terpstra]

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, LINDER Thierry wrote:

Do you have an account in /etc/passwd called 'nobody'?

- John T.


 Hello,

 I try to implement a samba server (2.2.7a) with the authentifiactions via winbind to 
 a PDC W2000.
 When I test winbind, it works:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -t
 Secret is good
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# wbinfo -a tli%password
 plaintext password authentication succeeded
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]#

 I enable the winbind on the /etc/nsswitch.conf:

 passwd: files winbind
 shadow: files
 group:  files winbind

 If I try to do a su to my user which is not declared in my /etc/passwd, it works 
 fine:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# su - tli
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$ id
 uid=10061(tli) gid=1(Domain Users) groups=1(Domain Users),10062(PRJ - 
 Gestion de projets),10058(KAM),10054(Team-Elargi),10018(IT Unix),10060(PRJ - 
 Sharepoint),10053(testgrp)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] tli]$

 Also, I assume that the winbind levell is OK.
 But, If I try to open a share with smbclient, I can't:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbclient -L pxtest
 added interface ip=172.30.1.167 bcast=172.30.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
 Password:
 Anonymous login successful
 Domain=[UDITIS] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix]

 Sharename  Type  Comment
 -    ---
 test   Disk  Share de test pour les ACL's
 IPC$   IPC   IPC Service (Samba Server 
 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix + ACL's support)
 ADMIN$ Disk  IPC Service (Samba Server 
 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix + ACL's support)

 Server   Comment
 ----
 PXTEST   Samba Server 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix + ACL's
 UDNEJ102

 WorkgroupMaster
 ----
 UDITIS   UDNEJ102
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbclient //pxtest/tli -U tli
 added interface ip=172.30.1.167 bcast=172.30.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
 Password:
 session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#

 Here is my smb.conf configuration file:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# cat smb.conf
 # Samba config file created using SWAT
 # from udpexp07.uditis.ch (172.30.1.131)
 # Date: 2003/11/21 10:22:37

 # Global parameters
 [global]
 workgroup = UDITIS
 netbios name = PXTEST
 server string = Samba Server %v + ACL's support
 security = DOMAIN
 encrypt passwords = No
 obey pam restrictions = Yes
 password server = udnej102.uditis.ch
 pam password change = Yes
 passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
 passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n 
 *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
 unix password sync = Yes
 log level = 2
 log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log
 max log size = 0
 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
 preferred master = No
 local master = No
 domain master = No
 dns proxy = No
 winbind uid = 1-2
 winbind gid = 1-2
 template homedir = /home/test/%U
 template shell = /bin/bash
 winbind cache time = 0
 winbind use default domain = Yes
 guest account = Guest
 printing = cups

 [homes]
 comment = Home Directories
 valid users = %S
 read only = No
 create mask = 0664
 directory mask = 0775
 browseable = No

 [printers]
 comment = All Printers
 path = /var/spool/samba
 printable = Yes
 browseable = No

 [test]
 comment = Share de test pour les ACL's
 path = /home/test
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]#

 Thanks by advance to help me on this trouble, because I found nothing serious on the 
 logs and I passed through alla my ideas ...

 Many thanks

 Thierry
 --

 Thierry Linder   Tél. central +41 (0)32 557 55 00
 Mandataire CommercialMobile   +41 (0)79 473 92 35
 Key Account Manager  Fax  +41 (0)32 557 55 05
 Rue de la Gare 4
 CH 2034 Peseux (NE)
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.uditis.ch

 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-- 
John H Terpstra
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Volume labels in XP

[George N. Weinisch]

We are having difficulties in getting the volume labels on mapped drives 
to appear consistently in XP over 2.2.8a.  Occasionally they will be 
rendered correctly, but more often than not the label shows up as a 
series of three boxes in windows, and a vol issued at a command prompt 
returns ??? for the drive in question.  The change in behaviour seems 
more a function of whether the drive has ever been mapped from that 
particular workstation previously, rather than any changes being made to 
smb.conf.  All Win2K workstations render the volume label correctly 
regardless of service pack.  We have tried explictly providing the label 
in smb.conf using the volume = parameter, to no avail.  Any thoughts?



George

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] UK Success Story

[Mark Taylor]

Hi Guys,

Just got the OK from the company concerned to publicly announce:

Walkers Snack Foods (largest snack food manufacturer in the UK and
subsiduary of Pepsico - *everyone* eats their stuff over here!) are
using Samba 3 to integrate their increasing use of Open Source with
their existing Active Directory domain.

We've just finished helping them replace MS ISA with Squid,
authenticating against AD using Samba 3 components.

A massive thank-you and huge praise to the Samba team from the Walkers
tech team (this project led by Alasdair Morison) for all your hard work
and for the wonderful technology suite Samba is.

I'm told that Walkers were the *first* site in the UK to deploy MS ISA
and were once a reference site for the product. It is now been reduced
to a coffee coaster thanks to you and the Squid team's hard work

Another heartfelt thanks from the UK!

Cheers,

Mark
-- 
...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more
expected...

- Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] net getlocalsid fails

[Brett Blackham]

I am using Samba 3.0 and when I run net getlocalsid I receive:

[2003/11/21 04:38:08, 0] utils/net.c:net_getlocalsid(414)

  Can't fetch domain SID for name: REDHAT

 

What am I doing wrong?  

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] how legal is samba

[Buchan Milne]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

 Message: 29
 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:32:07 + (GMT)
 From: Tom Crummey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Samba] how legal is samba
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii

 Hello Ed,

 My understanding of the licensing issue is that *any* client that uses
 a windows server, whether directly, or indirectly via Samba requires
 a Client Access license.

AFAIK this was the case with NT4. And AFAIK they changed it in win2k so
that you had no CAL licensing incentive to install samba servers into a
win2k domain, so now you need a CAL for each client that *authenticates*
to a Windows 2000 server. Thus, if you run a samba domain, your clients
all authenticate to a samba domain controller, and no CALs are needed
for Windows 2000 member servers (as respecting file/print service - you
still need CALs for other services such as MSSQL etc).

Of course, you should read the EULAs etc yourself and/or ask your legal
representative for their opinion.

IMHO, better to avoid agreeing to the EULAs in the first place, then
they have no legal basis to audit your premises.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/vkFxrJK6UGDSBKcRAguTAJ9VYq2iZu2bgeh2G82SOl2HmkPC2ACfTjG4
irUWsWExSxrNJyTcHYTG07Y=
=zrZm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Is smbpasswd against windows 2003 server working?

[Tim Jordan]

Andrew, what is a good way to troubleshoot winbind?  I can login using
w2k domain accts, I can use w2k domain groups on shares, but I can't
seem to use a domain account on a share:

[test]
path = /test
valid users = BUZZ
write list = BUZZ

The user on the windows client is promted for credentials but nothing
works
Please advise,
Tim

On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 19:42, Andrew Bartlett wrote:

 On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 13:24, Vandeir Eduardo wrote: 
  Hi guys,
  
  me again. Please, I would like to know if this is a bug/
  incompatibility with windows 2003 server.
  I would like that someone that has accounts stored on windows
  2003 server make a test and try to change a password of one of
  those users from a linux box using smbpasswd -r w2k3_host -U username.
  For me it always complains about invalid username or password.
  This work if I change a password of an user account stored on
  a NT server, but not 2003 server.
  Or anyone know another way to change an user password stored
  on windows 2003 server from a linux box?
  
  I'm deseperate and would appreciate any hint.
 
 It is quite possible that they are not fully compatible, given some of
 the new 'security settings' that Win2k3 PDCs use by default.  In
 particular, smbpasswd -U -r uses a 'null session', which is defeated by
 'restrict anonymous'.  
 
 A kerberos password change might still work, and pam_winbind is
 certainly a good option (Samba 3.0)
 
 Andrew Bartlett
 
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Building as non-root user

[Matt Seitz]

Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On a reasonably sensible linux system, the tests that require root can
be ignored safely.  Indeed, it's only the ./configure stage that needs
it at all.

 (On other unix systems, these tests can be important however)
If I run configure as root, and then run make as non-root, I run into a 
problem.  I read in GNU AUTOCONF, AUTOMAKE AND LIBTOOL 
(http://sources.redhat.com/autobook) that it is best to use a build directory 
separate from the source directory.  I like that approach, so I am creating a 
build directory and running ../source/configure from that directory as root.

If I then run make as non-root, I get an error:

Building include/proto.h
creating /opt/teamware/orion-cifs/src/ext/samba/build/include/proto.h
/opt/teamware/orion-cifs/src/ext/samba/source/script/mkproto.sh: 
/opt/teamware/orion-cifs/src/ext/samba/build/include/proto.h.14373.tmp~: No such 
file or directory
mv: cannot stat 
`/opt/teamware/orion-cifs/src/ext/samba/build/include/proto.h.14373.tmp~': No 
such file or directory
make: *** [include/proto.h] Error 1

It appears the error is caused by configure creating an include directory 
that cannot be modified by another user.

Any suggestions on how best to solve this problem?

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Samba PDC + XP: still not solved?

[Robin Edgar - Tripany]

Hi all,

I've been reading and there's a lot to read but no solution!
I'm using samba 2.2.3a-12.3 for Debian and I seem to have set
everything I can:

changed the signsecurechannel, sealsecurechannel in the registry to 0
(and back to 1),

Changed the policies for autoenrollent and the password encryption
(put that off in samba and in windows and then back on again)

But ALWAYS do I get the following problem - when I change the settings
in the computer properties samba makes the accounts fine (in passwd,
shadow and smbpasswd), and I get
the welcome to domain screen. When I reboot and try to log in, it can't find the
PDC or it won't accept my logon. When I have a look in the logfile all
it shows is:

[2003/11/21 18:03:37, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(458)
  Closing connections
[2003/11/21 18:03:50, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(321)
  Allowed connection from  (192.168.0.28)
[2003/11/21 18:04:01, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(458)
  Closing connections
[2003/11/21 18:07:11, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(1052)
  Username guest is invalid on this system

(last message after I log into the XP machine instead of the domain).

I've seen this message a few times, but nowhere is there any real
solution! SOMEONE must have fixed this by now!


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] A device attached to the system is not functioning.

[Bruce Shaw]

I'm attempting to access a Solaris server (bart) which was previously a
member of an NT resource domain running SAMBA 2.2.1a after it has been
upgraded to SAMBA 3.0.1pre3.  When I attempt to browse it with a Windows
2000 workstation, I get a box saying:

\\bart is not accessible.

A device attached to the system is not functioning.

if a do smbclient -U (my account) -L bart

it returns

session setup failed:  NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL.

smbd.log reports

open_sockets_smbd: accept:  Software caused connection abort.

I get a logfile for my IP address that reports

lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(940)
getppername failed.  Error was Transport endpoint is not connected

What's wrong?

This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to which it is
addressed, and may contain confidential, personal and or privileged
information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended
recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take action
relying on it. Any communication received in error, or subsequent reply,
should be deleted or destroyed.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Windows XP Pro (client) with Samba 3 Server

[Ryan D. Hatch]

Hi everybody!
 
I have a problem that I just cant seem to figure out.  I am running
Windows XP Professional and I am trying to authenticate to my samba 3
server.  I type:
\\servername file:///\\servername  into the run dialog box, and up
comes a list lf shares.  When I click on the shares however, I am
prompted with the Connect to servername dialog box, but the username
is grayed out and it says: servername\Guest.  It prompts me for a
password, but I am unable to put in a correct username.  I already have
ForceGuest turned off on my XP box.  It is also interesting to know that
Windows 2000 boxes can connect and authenticate just fine at the
password prompt and are not forced to use the guest account.
Furthermore, I am able to connect just fine to other Windows 2000 boxes
from my XP box. (when doing so, it prompts me for a username and
password like normal).  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Thanks in advance!
 
Ryan
 
Here is a copy of my smb.conf:
 
[global]
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 50
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
password server = None
security = SHARE
dns proxy = no
 
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = no
writeable = yes
 
 
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = no
printable = yes
 
[music]
comment = music
path = /mnt/hdf/music
writeable = yes
 
[applications]
comment = applications
path = /mnt/hdf/applications
writeable = yes
 
[books]
comment = books
path = /mnt/hdf/books
writeable = yes
 
[games]
comment = games
path = /mnt/hdf/games
writeable = yes
 
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Samba 2.2.8a Solaris 9

[Todd Johnson]

We have Samba 2.2.8a working fine here in our office for file sharing 
and print sharing. We wanted to now start using the PDC option of this 
build. I have added the needed switches in the smb.conf file for a PDC 
(verifed this through many FAQ's and Googles and Book walk-throughs). 
The problem is this. When I try to add a client to the domain it 
responds that the domain is not found and maybe I typed it wrong. It 
backs about DNS. My DNS settings are fine. I have went through them a 
few times already. We have spent a few hours troubleshooting this with 
no luck. We feel that everyhing is correct in our smb.conf file. The 
testparm prints out fine that these switches are in fact yes.

Anyone ever run across setting up a PDC function and then not be able to 
FIND the PDC??

All the other options samba gives us are running properly (file share 
and printing).

Todd



	




--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba PDC + XP: still not solved?

[rruegner]

HI, please update to version 3 and you dont need seal stuff anymore
you can get via apt-get install
Best Regards
- Original Message - 
From: Robin Edgar - Tripany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 6:45 PM
Subject: [Samba] Samba PDC + XP: still not solved?


 Hi all,

 I've been reading and there's a lot to read but no solution!
 I'm using samba 2.2.3a-12.3 for Debian and I seem to have set
 everything I can:

 changed the signsecurechannel, sealsecurechannel in the registry to 0
 (and back to 1),

 Changed the policies for autoenrollent and the password encryption
 (put that off in samba and in windows and then back on again)

 But ALWAYS do I get the following problem - when I change the settings
 in the computer properties samba makes the accounts fine (in passwd,
 shadow and smbpasswd), and I get
 the welcome to domain screen. When I reboot and try to log in, it can't
find the
 PDC or it won't accept my logon. When I have a look in the logfile all
 it shows is:

 [2003/11/21 18:03:37, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(458)
   Closing connections
 [2003/11/21 18:03:50, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(321)
   Allowed connection from  (192.168.0.28)
 [2003/11/21 18:04:01, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(458)
   Closing connections
 [2003/11/21 18:07:11, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(1052)
   Username guest is invalid on this system

 (last message after I log into the XP machine instead of the domain).

 I've seen this message a few times, but nowhere is there any real
 solution! SOMEONE must have fixed this by now!


 -- 
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] User Description and Full name

[Fabrício Adorno]

Samba Team,

I'v got a domain working fine with samba 3.0.0 release, but I can't set 
User Full Name and Descripton fields with pdbedit or even with windows 
program usrmgr.exe. Is it implemented?

Thanks in advance,

Fabrício Adorno

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba PDC + XP: still not solved?

[McKeever Chris]

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 18:45 , Robin Edgar - Tripany [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

Hi all,

I've been reading and there's a lot to read but no solution!
I'm using samba 2.2.3a-12.3 for Debian and I seem to have set
everything I can:

changed the signsecurechannel, sealsecurechannel in the registry to 0
(and back to 1),

Changed the policies for autoenrollent and the password encryption
(put that off in samba and in windows and then back on again)

But ALWAYS do I get the following problem - when I change the settings
in the computer properties samba makes the accounts fine (in passwd,
shadow and smbpasswd), and I get
the welcome to domain screen. When I reboot and try to log in, it can't find the
PDC or it won't accept my logon. When I have a look in the logfile all
it shows is:

[2003/11/21 18:03:37, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(458)
  Closing connections
[2003/11/21 18:03:50, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(321)
  Allowed connection from  (192.168.0.28)
[2003/11/21 18:04:01, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(458)
  Closing connections
[2003/11/21 18:07:11, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(1052)
  Username guest is invalid on this system

(last message after I log into the XP machine instead of the domain).

I've seen this message a few times, but nowhere is there any real
solution! SOMEONE must have fixed this by now!


make sure that you have run smbpasswd -w THELDAPPASSWORD 
and that you havent changed the machine name since.

Can you send your SMB.CONF from the PDC?

are you using any LDAP replication to othewr 'semi-bdc' servers?





-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba




 Prudential Preferred Properties   www.prupref.com  

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] smbmount and credentials file

[Joe Cipale]

I have a small LAN:
SuSE 7.2 with Samba 3.0 and a W2K box.

What I can do:
I can create shares from the W2K box that make files from the Linux box
visible. I can also manually mount (using % smbmount ... ) from the
command line as root. Here is where I run into problems. The only way I
can mount a partition via smbmount is if I use the username=user%passwd
option. If I attempt to setup a .smbpw file, I am prompted for the
password of the user I am attempting to create the mountpoint for. For
example:
% smbmount //w2k_srv/fred /smb/fred -o
credentials=/root/.smbpw_fred,uid-fred,pid=fred,fmask=664,dmask=775
Password:

Upon entring the password for user fred, the mount point is created and
the file are accessible. The .smbpw_fred file looks like this:
fred%passwd

Likewise, if I attempt to edit the /etc/fstab entry with the following
line:
//w2k_srv/fred/smb/fred   smbfs   username=fred%passwd,
uid=fred, gid=fred, fmask=664, dmask=775 0 0
I get an error that the fstab has an error at the line that references
the samba mount point. Any ideas here? This is the last thing i need to
get samba fully functional on my LAN. Everything else has been a piece
of cake!

Thank you in advance,

Joe Cipale


-- 
#--#
#   Penguinix Consulting   #
#--#
#Software development, QA and testing. #
#Linux support and training.   #
#Don't fear the penguin! #
#--#
# Registered Linux user: #309247 http://counter.li.org #
#--#
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] samba and OSX issue

[Philip Edelbrock]

OS-X wants Samba 3.0.  It fixes a lot of issues that OS-X has with SMB.  
Another issue you may be hitting is large file support.  You might do 
some searches in the list to see if there are discussions related to 
that which you may be experiencing.

BTW- OS-X in general seems to have flakey network support.  It is 
getting better, but it's been my #1 headache.

Phil

Tom Brown wrote:

Hi,

Does anyone know if there is a bug within Jaguar that makes its support for
smb a bit flakey?
We are having an issue where large files are timing out over the network -
these are mainly video based.
We have tried 2.2.5 and 2.2.8a but with the same result and windows does not
seem to have the same issue.
Can anyone confirm this please?

thanks

 

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Which Linux best suits Samba3?

[Eric Geater 11/18/03]

In a discussion with one of the main answer people, of whose time I am
greatly appreciative, it was suggested that some of my problem (or
solution) may be to run Samba on a distro that's better suited for it.
Problem is, I don't have the time nor the inclination to download a
bunch of distros just to install, test, fdisk, repeat.

So I ask. what is a recommended recent distro that works well with Samba
3?  Drake?  Debian?  SuSE?  RH9?  All answers welcome, with explanations
or not.

Thanks

Eric
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Which Linux best suits Samba3?

[Arturo Busleiman]

GNU/Linux suits it nicely.

The only thing a distribution adds is: Support, documentation and
installation/configuration programs. I like suse for that, but I do also
love Slackware. And I like Debian's apt-get, which I use on SuSE :P

Use any distribution where you can get GCC to work, so you can download,
compile and install the required libraries for samba, and then, samba
itself.

Bye

PS: I work for the argentinian SuSE business partner :P

-- 
Arturo   Busleiman   -  [ i n t r a R e d e s   s r l ]
Piedras 264 - 2 A (C1070AAF) - Buenos Aires - ARGENTINA
Te.: (54 11) 4342-0049   -   http://www.intraredes.com/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Eric Geater 11/18/03 wrote:

 In a discussion with one of the main answer people, of whose time I am
 greatly appreciative, it was suggested that some of my problem (or
 solution) may be to run Samba on a distro that's better suited for it.
 Problem is, I don't have the time nor the inclination to download a
 bunch of distros just to install, test, fdisk, repeat.

 So I ask. what is a recommended recent distro that works well with Samba
 3?  Drake?  Debian?  SuSE?  RH9?  All answers welcome, with explanations
 or not.

 Thanks

 Eric
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] [Homes] directories created by winbind - permissions ?

[leopardb]

Hi,

I eventually made it work !
Samba/winbind/pam.d/*
There's only one thing left :
When my win2k users connect to the linux box (samba 2.2.8+winbind), they 
have a home directory created on the fly (if it wasn't already there). 
But the default permissions are drwxr-xr-x. I've tried all '* masks' but 
they concern only the files created by the users in their directory.

The linux box's hostname is alig.
My problem is 'user2' can connect to '//alig/user1' there he will only 
list directory's contents. But i don't even want user2 being able to 
list user1's home directory. Do i have to replace permissoins on each 
created directory (which is not a solution) or is it possible to set 
default permissions on template homedir ?

Thx :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] Starting with Samba - first impressions

[Woodward, Chris]

Did you change the /etc/xinet.d/swat file?
comment out the only from line
and change disable = no to yes
restart xinetd
-chris


 -Original Message-
 From: Todd O'Bryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 6:33 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Samba] Starting with Samba - first impressions
 
 
 So the SWAT thing is not just me. Several people have written 
 with this  
 same problem over the past few weeks and if anyone has solved 
 it they  
 haven't sent the solution to the list.
 
 I wish someone in the know who has an hour to kill (OK, I 
 realize I've  
 just described the empty set.) would install RH9 and go from a clean  
 install to getting SWAT to work and document what they did. Clearly,  
 one cannot follow the How-To's anywhere and have this work. 
 And most of  
 us who are having the problem are clueless enough that we don't know  
 what to do next if the directions get followed and the results don't  
 happen as expected.
 
 Todd
 
 On Nov 21, 2003, at 1:00 AM, Fran Fabrizio wrote:
 
 
  I promised John yesterday that I would document my 
 experiences as I  
  tried to convert this ugly two-headed network I've inherited (see  
  thread titled Having Samba integrate/replace existing mixed  
  Unix/Windows network from yesterday) into an easy-to-manage  
  Samba-based network.  I took the first baby steps and I 
 thought that  
  it would be interesting/useful to post semi-regularly here so that  
  those of you who are also looking to get started with Samba 
 can see  
  what someone else is going through, and those of you who 
 are so close  
  to the project that you might take some things for granted can see  
  some of the issues that one user is dealing with. :-)  If 
 this isn't  
  useful for anyone, I'll stop sending them. Anyhow, here's 
 day one
 
  
 --
 - 
  
  Day 1 - Creating a testbed, installing Samba, and a quick  
  proof-of-concept
 
  I've decided that for my testbed I would use a laptop 
 running linux as  
  my Samba server, and I would use VMWare to put an instance 
 of Win XP  
  Pro as my client.  This way, I have a self-contained Samba 
 network in  
  a laptop that can travel with me and does not rely on any network  
  connectivity to develop the Samba environment.  I thought 
 this would  
  be an easy part but one of the Redhat 9 ISOs that I 
 downloaded from  
  linuxiso had a corrupted package (disk 2, the xpdf package - two  
  separate downloads, two separate burns on two different 
 computers, and  
  both had the same flaw), followed by one XP Pro VMWare 
 install hang in  
  the middle.  As a result, it was nearly 5pm before I had the OSes  
  installed correctly and was ready to download Samba.
 
  Hopped onto samba.org and downloaded the 3.0.0 source.  Before  
  unpacking, I removed all Redhat RPMs for samba.  I then 
 proceeded to  
  follow the instructions in the Using Samba book to do my 
 config and  
  install.  Knowing that down the road I wanted to play with 
 all sorts  
  of authentication options, I chose to configure Samba with 
 PAM, LDAP,  
  NIS+ as well as smbwrapper and smbmount and automount and syslog.   
  Configuration and build went fine, except it took forever 
 (maybe 30  
  minutes) on the laptop so I hope I don't have to do this 
 too often.   
  Install went fine.
 
  I followed the book and created a small smb.conf that 
 simply creates a  
  share called test (/usr/local/samba/tmp).  I dropped a 
 test file in  
  there.  I then tried to see how the same thing would look from  
  SWAT
 
  Bump #1.  I followed the book.  I checked /etc/services for 
 the swat  
  entry (it was there already).  I then added a swat file to  
  /etc/xinetd.d/ directory as per the book.  /bin/kill -HUP 
 -a xinetd.   
  Logs show that it restarted ok.  Open browser, go to  
  http://localhost:901/, it spins for a while, then 
 connection refused.   
  Try again, connection refused.  Double-check all files, 
 notice that  
  the path the book had me enter (/usr/local/samba/bin/swat) 
 is wrong -  
  it's /usr/local/samba/sbin/swat.  Fix this, try again, connection  
  refused.  Send more HUP signals to xinetd, nothing seems to work.   
  netstat doesn't indicate anything listening on port 901.  I 
 never did  
  get Swat running but I am a text config kind of guy anyhow 
 and I was  
  anxious to get on, so I put it aside for another day after 
 about 15  
  minutes and a coupel of fruitless google searches.
 
  I fired up the daemons and they started fine.  I did an 
 smbclient -U%  
  -L localhost a few times, the test share was listed, 
 everything looked  
  just like the book said it would except (Bump #2) where it says  
  Master next to Workgroup it was always blank.  This was  
  disconcerting but I decided to press on.  (About 10 minutes 
 later I  
  tried it again, and it was now listed as the laptop's name. 
  I guess  

[Samba] Re: Which Linux best suits Samba3?

[Doug MacFarlane]

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:40:40 -0600, Eric Geater 11/18/03 wrote:

 So I ask. what is a recommended recent distro that works well with Samba
 3?  Drake?  Debian?  SuSE?  RH9?  All answers welcome, with explanations
 or not.

For server-based implementations, Debian rules.  Rock solid, strong
security orientation, and the best package-management system on the planet.

madmac

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] Starting with Samba - first impressions

[Woodward, Chris]

oops,
I really meant,
change disable = yes to no...

sorry Fran,

-chris


 -Original Message-
 From: Woodward, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 3:02 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Samba] Starting with Samba - first impressions
 
 
 Did you change the /etc/xinet.d/swat file?
 comment out the only from line
 and change disable = no to yes
 restart xinetd
 -chris
 
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] Starting with Samba - first impressions

[Fran Fabrizio]

Yep, figured as much. :-)  /etc/xinetd.d/swat didn't exist on my RH9
stock install, so I created it with the content recommended in the Using
Samba book.  The book recommended only from = localhost.  Once I
commented that out, it works fine.  Wonder why it doesn't think I am
coming from localhost? 

Thanks!

-Fran

On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 14:18, Woodward, Chris wrote:
 oops,
 I really meant,
 change disable = yes to no...
 
 sorry Fran,
 
 -chris
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Woodward, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 3:02 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: [Samba] Starting with Samba - first impressions
  
  
  Did you change the /etc/xinet.d/swat file?
  comment out the only from line
  and change disable = no to yes
  restart xinetd
  -chris
  

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] XP machines show very long server name

[Gary MacKay]

I ran the command smbclient -d9 -L server  junklog and then searched 
the junklog file. I found this line:

Domain=[NCIPRECAST] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.7-security-rollup-fix]

which shows the the very long server name/description. WinXP machines 
show that whole thing in Windows Explorer. Very annoying. How do I 
shorten that?

- Gary

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Problem with RH 9 and Samba version 2.2.7a-8.9.0

[Martin Stacey]

I'm upgrading to a RH 9 box and using the version of Samba that comes with
RH 9.

I notice this error message in the smbd.log file;

[2003/11/21 21:15:19, 0] smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_init_kernel_oplocks(287)
   Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_LEASE handler

It seems to effect the domain admin group parameter.

In previous version of RH (7.3) and Samba (2.2.7-3.7.3), I'm able to browse
other machines in my domain as I'm in this group.

Since I upgraded, I can't do this anymore and I noticed this error message.

When I reverted back to RH 7.3 and Samba 2.2.7-3.7.3 everything works
perfectly.

Has anyone else experienced this problem? If so, is there a fix for it?

Martin Stacey
IT Support Manager
Safcol Australia Pty Ltd


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Samba 3 and OpenLDAP 2.1.22

[Jason Williams]

Good afternoon everyone.

I'm testing out the new samba 3 (3.0.1 to be exact) with openldap 2.1.22. ( 
have setup a samba 2.2.8a with openldap 2.0.27 as a PDC in the past)
I've read up on a few pages about some of the reqs that are needed:

http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/smb-ldap-3-howto.html

I've followed the Samba How-To as well. I edited my slapd.conf file and 
added the correct schemas and indexs. I rebuilt my slapindex no problem.

I added some inital data to my LDAP tree so I could see what is going on 
and to track a few things.

Whats odd is that if I do a simple search in my tree (ldapsearch -x) I cant 
seem to pull any of the information that I entered. I entered just some 
basic stuff, very similar to what was in the Samba how-to. I just took out 
a few things and changed the fields to reflect my company.

It could be that I have just missed a step entirely, but for some reason, I 
cannot see anything in my tree, even though I added informatin via a .ldif 
file.

Here is the output from my testparm:

Load smb config files from /etc/samba3/smb.conf
Processing section [homes]
Loaded services file OK.
Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC
Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = COURTESYCORP
netbios name = PENGUIN-DANCER
server string = Samba Server %v
map to guest = Bad User
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldaps://ldap.mydomain.com, smbpasswd, guest
log level = 2
log file = /var/log/samba3/log.%m
max log size = 50
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
add user script = /usr/share/samba3/scripts/smbldap-useradd.pl '%u'
delete user script = /usr/share/samba3/scripts/smbldap-userdel.pl '%u'
add group script = /usr/share/samba3/scripts/smbldap-groupadd.pl 
'%g'  /usr/share/samba3/scripts/smbldap-groupshow.pl %g|awk 
'/^gidNumber:/ {print $2}'
delete group script = /usr/share/samba3/scripts/smbldap-userdel.pl 
'%g'
add user to group script = 
/usr/share/samba3/scripts/smbldap-groupmod.pl -m '%u' '%g'
delete user from group script = 
/usr/share/samba3/scripts/smbldap-groupmod.pl -x '%u' '%g'
set primary group script = 
/usr/share/samba3/scripts/smbldap-usermod.pl -g '%g' '%u'
add machine script = /usr/share/samba3/scripts/smbldap-useradd.pl 
-w -d /dev/null -g machines -c 'Machine Account' -s /bin/false %u
domain logons = Yes
preferred master = Yes
domain master = Yes
dns proxy = No
ldap suffix = dc=acme,dc=com
ldap machine suffix = cn=Computers,dc=acme,dc=com
ldap user suffix = ou=People,dc=acme,dc=com
ldap group suffix = ou=Group,dc=acme,dc=com
ldap idmap suffix = dc=acme,dc=com
ldap admin dn = cn=root,dc=acme,dc=com
ldap ssl = start tls
hosts allow = 192.168.1., 127.

[homes]
comment = Home Directories
read only = No
browseable = No
I apologize for my brain freeze right now. I thought i'd ask for some help 
and see what im missing.

I do appreciate it.

Cheers,

Jason

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba 3 and OpenLDAP 2.1.22

[Adam Williams]

 I've followed the Samba How-To as well. I edited my slapd.conf file and 
 added the correct schemas and indexs. I rebuilt my slapindex no problem.
 I added some inital data to my LDAP tree so I could see what is going on 
 and to track a few things.

After you did your slapadd/slapindex, and before you started the ldap
service, did you make sure that the LDAP database files (/var/lib/ldap?)
where owned by the ldap user and not root?

service ldap stop
chown ldap:ldap /var/lib/ldap/*
service ldap start

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] adding network printer in W2K

[Joe Cipale]

I have my network printer configured under Samba. When I logon to W2K, I
can see the printer, but I am unable to open the printer to spool files.

I get the message that I must install the pritner driver in order for it
to work. ANy suggestions?

Joe
-- 
#--#
#Don't fear the penguin! #
#--#
# Registered Linux user: #309247 http://counter.li.org #
#--#
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] make: *** [dynconfig.o] Error 1

[Chew, Darren]

Hi All,

I get the following error compiling Samba 3.0.0 on Solaris 9.

Compiling dynconfig.c
In file included from include/includes.h:896,
 from dynconfig.c:21:
include/proto.h:497: error: parse error before LDAP_CONST
make: *** [dynconfig.o] Error 1

./configure \
--prefix=/usr/local/samba \
--with-libiconv=/usr/local/libiconv \
--with-ldap\ 
--with-pam\ 
--with-pam_smbpass\ 
--with-winbind\ 
--with-included-popt

Are any CPPFLAGS or LDFLAGS needed? Any help much appreciated. Thanks.

Darren

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] WINS problem?

[Chad Morgan]

I'm exeriencing a problem with about 10 Windows 2000 Professional clients connecting 
to Samba server on Solaris.

When connecting to the Solaris box, each of the clients gets a duplicate name exists 
on the network error. 

There are no duplicate names on the network and this affects all computers. The 
problem is temporarily resolved by unplugging the Solaris box from the network, 
booting all Win 2k boxes, then plugging the Solaris box back in.  This fix allows all 
clients to properly connect to the shares, but is not really a viable long-term 
solution.

This is a new problem that hasn't occured on a network that has been working properly 
until now, with one caviat.

The Solaris box is maintained by an outside vendor. I doubt they have changed anything 
in the Samba configuration, but I don't know for sure. Additionally, I do not have 
access to that machine.

All of the other information I've found so far relates to Win 2k servers and is in 
some way related to WINS. Also, all of the Microsoft information relates to servers. I 
haven't seen any solutions on the client side. So far the admin for the Solaris 
machine has been unwilling to look into the problem and is trying to shift blame.

I'm hoping someone here can provide some insight that I can pass along to the other 
admin that will hopefully cause him to look into the situation on his end. I would 
probably start by making sure the hostname (NetBIOS name) is not the same as the 
Workgroup/Domain name and possibly disabling WINS (if enabled). From there, I'm kind 
of at a loss of ideas. Also, if anyone has any ideas to fix this on the client side, 
your input would be appreciated.

Thanks
Chad Morgan
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] samba 3.0 does not list servers when map to guest = bad user ?

[Corey Hickey]

Hello,

I've been trying to configure a samba 3.0 server to play nicely both
with smbclient and with MS windows. The server in question is running
the samba 3.0.0final-1 with the default smb.conf file (for now).
At present, if I try to view the list of shares from within windows, I
get a login dialog box and cannot proceed. Using 'smbclient -L', I can
view the list of shares and servers - just like I want it to be.
The way I had fixed the problem with windows before, within samba 2.x,
was to set map to guest = bad user, which set up fallback to guest
access the way I wanted it to. Unfortunately, when I do that with samba
3.0 I cannot get a list of servers when I connect using a bad
username.
This is what happens when map to guest = never, the default if not
specified (user adsfsadf does not exist):
**begin**
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbclient -N -U adsfsadf -L darwin
Anonymous login successful
Sharename  Type  Comment
-    ---
print$ Disk  Printer Drivers
IPC$   IPC   IPC Service (darwin server (Samba 
3.0.0-Debian))
ADMIN$ IPC   IPC Service (darwin server (Samba 
3.0.0-Debian))
Anonymous login successful

Server   Comment
----
BEAUTY   The Wins Server
DARWIN   darwin server (Samba 3.0.0-Debian)
WorkgroupMaster
----
CZR  BEAUTY
***end***
...and this is what happens when map to guest = bad user. Note that
the Server section is empty.
**begin**
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbclient -N -U adsfsadf -L darwin
Sharename  Type  Comment
-    ---
print$ Disk  Printer Drivers
IPC$   IPC   IPC Service (darwin server (Samba 
3.0.0-Debian))
ADMIN$ IPC   IPC Service (darwin server (Samba 
3.0.0-Debian))

Server   Comment
----
WorkgroupMaster
----
CZR  BEAUTY
***end***
Interestingly enough, when I connect using smbclient from samba 2.x, the
servers are still listed even if map to guest = bad user. The only
difference in the output is that Anonymous login successful is shown
when map to guest = never.
Also, I can specify -U nobody to smbclient v3.0, but I'd rather not do
so unless that's really the only clean way to solve the problem. Regular
connections to a share (smbclient //server/sharename) seem to get
mapped to guest properly without having to specify user nobody.
So, (finally) my question is this:
How can I properly enable guess access on the samba server such that
windows can access the shares without getting a password prompt, and
smbclient v3.0 can see the list of servers without specifying -U
nobody?
By now you might be wondering why seeing the server list is so important
to me when there's only two servers listed. :)  Actually, I'm trying to
work out a fix for this so I can appropriately change the configuration
of a wins server. Right now I'm just messing with a test-box, but the
symptoms are the same.
I'm attaching a copy of my smb.conf file. It's the default configuration
from the Debian samba-common 3.0.0final-1 package.
Thanks in advance for any help,
Corey
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Fwd: Samba semantics error?

[Jeremy Allison]

On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 10:01:32PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
 
 But if I go into windows explorer I can delete the file even though it's
 marked read-only.

It's implicitly removing the RO attribute before the delete.

 You can also remove the read-only attrib in windows servers, but not on
 samba servers (unless you have write access which negates the entire
 purpose...).
 
 Here's what I want:
 
 make files read-only, make directories writable (for user and group only)
 can't modify files, must move or delete.
 
 Here's what I get:
 I can move or delete read-only files to my heart's content as long as I own
 the files.  If I don't, then nada.  No moving or deleting.

I still don't get exactly what you want I'm afraid. Currently we're
implementing POSIX semantics where delete/rename belongs to the directory, not
the file.

The parameters dos filemode and dos filetimes provide some semblance
of the DOS semantics.

I'm still unclear on exactly what doesn't work for you. Can you give
me an exact example ?

Jeremy.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Which Linux best suits Samba3?

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 05:40, Eric Geater 11/18/03 wrote:
 In a discussion with one of the main answer people, of whose time I am
 greatly appreciative, it was suggested that some of my problem (or
 solution) may be to run Samba on a distro that's better suited for it.
 Problem is, I don't have the time nor the inclination to download a
 bunch of distros just to install, test, fdisk, repeat.
 
 So I ask. what is a recommended recent distro that works well with Samba
 3?  Drake?  Debian?  SuSE?  RH9?  All answers welcome, with explanations
 or not.

A particular point to consider is the native support for MIT kerberos
1.3.1, or the right Heimdal version.

Fedora Core 1 has this, and I think the latest SUSE does, Debian Testing
and Debain Unstable do have the right krb5, but naturally Debian Stable
does not. In particular, note RH9 does NOT, and this can get in your
way.   

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Printing to Intel InBusiness Print Station from SAMBA

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 21:44, Artyom Viklenko wrote:
 Hi, all!
 
 Does any body use this print station?
 I try print via smbspool or smbclient and every time
 I got access denyed error.
 
 # smbspool smb://ps786fba/Printer1 101 artem Test 1 - test.txt
 ERROR: ERRSRV - ERRaccess opening remote file Test
 #

I think this was raised recently - we are using a new SMB command than
this particular server would like us to, and it complains.  I'm not sure
if the current 3.0 CVS includes 'backdown' code, but it needs to.

If this isn't already in bugzilla, please log it.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Is smbpasswd against windows 2003 server working?

[Vandeir Eduardo]

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:

 On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 13:24, Vandeir Eduardo wrote:
  Hi guys,
 
  me again. Please, I would like to know if this is a bug/
  incompatibility with windows 2003 server.
  I would like that someone that has accounts stored on windows
  2003 server make a test and try to change a password of one of
  those users from a linux box using smbpasswd -r w2k3_host -U username.
  For me it always complains about invalid username or password.
  This work if I change a password of an user account stored on
  a NT server, but not 2003 server.
  Or anyone know another way to change an user password stored
  on windows 2003 server from a linux box?
 
  I'm deseperate and would appreciate any hint.

 It is quite possible that they are not fully compatible, given some of
 the new 'security settings' that Win2k3 PDCs use by default.  In
 particular, smbpasswd -U -r uses a 'null session', which is defeated by
 'restrict anonymous'.

 A kerberos password change might still work, and pam_winbind is
 certainly a good option (Samba 3.0)

No matter what I do smbpasswd doesn't work. So, following you sugestion,
I configured krb5.conf and tried kpasswd. It worked! Phew... Now I can
continue to migrate NT to w2k3.

Thanks for the tip!

__
Vandeir Eduardo (CCNA)
Laboratório de Computação e Informática (LCI) - Campus IV
Fundacao Universidade Regional de Blumenau (FURB)
Rua Braz Wanka, 238 - CEP: 89.035-160 - Blumenau (SC)
Blumenau, SC, Brasil.
Fone: +55 (047) 321-7819 - Fax: 321-7802



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] RE: winbindd panic daemon dies

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 21:27, ww m-pubsyssamba wrote:
 Hi, please find attatched the back trace from my winbindd (samba 3.0.0) panic,

Bugger - it's another malloc() related bug.  That means that some free()
call - sometime before this one, was misused.  If you were running it on
linux, I would suggest running winbind under valgrind, but there might
be some other ways to help track this down:

Are there any debugging malloc libraries for Solaris?  

Is it reasonable to try and setup a linux box in a matching setup?  

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Fwd: Samba semantics error?

[Mike Fedyk]

On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 11:21:51PM +, Jeremy Allison wrote:
 The parameters dos filemode and dos filetimes provide some semblance
 of the DOS semantics.
 
 I'm still unclear on exactly what doesn't work for you. Can you give
 me an exact example ?

Sure.  Here is my origional report I sent to the Debian BTS.

BTW, delete readonly = yes allows me to do what I want, but I still think
there is a bug in not returning the correct error code with 
delete readonly = no (it says something about not being able to find the
file instead of Access Denied, like when I try to remove the read-only
attribute from a file I don't own). 

And let me say that there is a regular user named admin and admin != root
in this example below.

Just for reference, this is Debian Bug#218390 available at bugs.debian.org,
which is down ATM, and should be up in the next few days.



Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 20:41:53 -0800
From: Mike Fedyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Samba ML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fwd: Samba semantics error?
Mail-Followup-To: Samba ML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-Spam-DCC: : 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on 
fileserver.matchmail.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60

Hello,

I have this bug report that I have filed.  Is there any specific reason why
samba behaves this way, and doesn't use the unix semantics?  Since this is
even more restrictive than unix semantics, I'm more inclined to call it a
bug until I know it's supposed to be this way.

Any ideas?

- Forwarded message from Mike Fedyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

From: Mike Fedyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: samba: Samba semantics error?
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.34
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 18:21:38 -0800

Package: samba
Version: 3.0.0final-1
Severity: normal

Hi there,

I have this directory:

drwxrws---2 adminssh96 Oct 30 17:09 .
drwxrwsr-x4 adminssh   112 Oct 30 17:08 ..
-r-xr-1 mfedyk   ssh   12M Oct 29 15:40 mozilla-win32-1.5-installer.exe
-r-xr-1 adminssh 0 Oct 30 18:15 test.txt

Under linux, I can remove any file I'd like as long as I'm either the admin
user, or in the ssh group.

But under windows through samba as the admin user, I can't remove the
mozilla installer file, but I can remove the test.txt file.  And vise versa
with the mfedyk user through samba (but can remove the file as expected from
a bash shell).

I have tried the dos filemodes config option, but that requires the file to
give group write permissions, and I explicitly don't want to do that on this
share.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mis-mike-wstn 2.6.0-test6-mm4 #2 SMP Mon Oct 6 02:32:09 PDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages samba depends on:
ii  debconf   1.3.15 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libacl1   2.2.20-1   Access control list shared library
ii  libc6 2.3.2-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcomerr21.34+1.35-WIP-2003.08.21-3 The Common Error Description libra
ii  libcupsys21.1.19final-1.4Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  libgnutls70.8.9-2GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii  libkrb53  1.3-2  MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libldap2  2.1.22-1   OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libpam-module 0.76-14Pluggable Authentication Modules f
ii  libpam-runtim 0.76-14Runtime support for the PAM librar
ii  libpam0g  0.76-14Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libpopt0  1.7-2  lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  logrotate 3.6.5-2Log rotation utility
ii  netbase   4.14   Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii  samba-common  3.0.0final-1   Samba common files used by both th

-- debconf information:
  samba/nmbd_from_inetd: 
* samba/run_mode: daemons
  samba/log_files_moved: 
  samba/tdbsam: false
* samba/generate_smbpasswd: true



- End forwarded message -

# Please see the manual page for smb.conf for detailed description of
#   every parameter.

[global]
#default to 300 on 3.0.0
keepalive = 300
   
   #Optimizations
   # default 60 as of 3.0.0
   change notify timeout = 60 
   
    WINS
   Include = /etc/samba/service.wins
   wins server = wins
   
   #Authentcation
   security = domain
   guest account = nobody
   map to guest = Bad User
   username map = /etc/samba/username.map
   server string = %h (Samba %v)
   
   Browsing
   workgroup = matchmail
   password server = *
   
   #Logging
   #debug pid = Yes
   #debug uid = Yes
   log file = /var/log/samba/comp.%m
   
[default]
   browseable = no
   comment = Default netbios: 

Re: [Samba] Groups and LDAP

[Patrick]

Robert Rati wrote:

I think I understand.  So, if I want a user (in LDAP) to be a part of 
your ntadmins group, I'd set his gidNumber to 1000, correct?  Would I 
also need to add a memberUid field in the ntadmins group for this 
user?  IE for user bob: 
You could set the users gidNumber to 1000, but I think the user name 
still needs to appear in a memberUid of the group.  For my setup all 
users have the gid of 100 for the unix group users  Then I just add 
the memberUid to the ntadmins group and they are now members of the 
ntadmins.



dn: cn=ntadmins,ou=Groups,dc=firerun,dc=net
cn: ntadmins
objectClass: top
objectClass: posixGroup
gidNumber: 1000
memberUid: root
memberUid: patrick
memberUid: bob
Can an LDAP user have a gidNumber of 0 and be a root user on a Unix 
machine?
As mentioned in an eariler message yes you can provided you are using 
LDAP for authentication on the Unix machine.

Patrick

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] adding network printer in W2K

[Alan Munday]

I found this when I tried to use the CUPS-Samba drivers.

Using the Adobe drivers worked.

See How-to for details.

regards

Alan
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joe Cipale
Sent: 22 November 2003 05:47
To: Samba List
Subject: [Samba] adding network printer in W2K


I have my network printer configured under Samba. When I logon to W2K, I
can see the printer, but I am unable to open the printer to spool files.

I get the message that I must install the pritner driver in order for it
to work. ANy suggestions?

Joe
-- 
#--#
#Don't fear the penguin! #
#--#
# Registered Linux user: #309247 http://counter.li.org #
#--#
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Re: Samba with winbind trouble

[John Little]

Try

smbclient //pxtest/tli -o username=yourdomain\tli
or if you have a separator in your smb.conf winbind:
smbclient //pxtest/tli -o username=YOURDOMAIN+tli
where the + sign is the separator defined in your smb.conf winbind
section


hth
John



[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbclient //pxtest/tli -U tli
added interface ip=172.30.1.167 bcast=172.30.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Password: 
session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# 

=
Happiness is understanding how things work.

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] re. Initial Samba Setup

[Kevin Barry]

On a recommendation from this list I checked the junklog file, the
output from which I attached below. It looks as if it does not even see
the linux machine as it indicates not seeing explorer which is the
local netbios name. The Win XP machine does not even show in the log.

Here is the last entry for nmbd.log:
 *
[2003/11/21 06:24:58, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:terminate(54)
  Got SIGTERM: going down...
[2003/11/21 17:36:19, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(665)
  Netbios nameserver version 3.0.0-15 started.
  Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1994-2003
[2003/11/21 17:42:08, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_stage2(396)
  *
  
  Samba name server EXPLORER is now a local master browser for workgroup
WORKGROUP on subnet 192.168.0.20
  
  *

Here is my very basic smb.conf:

[global]
workgroup = Workgroup
netbios name = explorer
[share 1]
path=/root

lmhosts file:
127.0.0.1 localhost


The junklog makes reference to a file /var/cache/samba/unexpected.tdb.
There are several .tdb files in that directory but not that one.



[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbclient -d9 -L explorer  junklog
[2003/11/21 20:49:17, 5] lib/debug.c:debug_dump_status(359)
  INFO: Current debug levels:
all: True/9
tdb: False/0
printdrivers: False/0
lanman: False/0
smb: False/0
rpc_parse: False/0
rpc_srv: False/0
rpc_cli: False/0
passdb: False/0
sam: False/0
auth: False/0
winbind: False/0
vfs: False/0
idmap: False/0
[2003/11/21 20:49:17, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_load(3926)
  lp_load: refreshing parameters
[2003/11/21 20:49:17, 3] param/loadparm.c:init_globals(1303)
  Initialising global parameters
[2003/11/21 20:49:17, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(87)
  Attempting to register new charset UCS-2LE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(95)
  Registered charset UCS-2LE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(87)
  Attempting to register new charset UTF8
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(95)
  Registered charset UTF8
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(87)
  Attempting to register new charset ASCII
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(95)
  Registered charset ASCII
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(87)
  Attempting to register new charset 646
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(95)
  Registered charset 646
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(87)
  Attempting to register new charset UCS2-HEX
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/iconv.c:smb_register_charset(95)
  Registered charset UCS2-HEX
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 3] param/params.c:pm_process(566)
  params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file
/etc/samba/smb.conf
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 3] param/loadparm.c:do_section(3429)
  Processing section [global]
  doing parameter workgroup = Workgroup
  doing parameter netbios name = explorer
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 4] param/loadparm.c:handle_netbios_name(2721)
  handle_netbios_name: set global_myname to: EXPLORER
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 4] param/loadparm.c:lp_load(3958)
  pm_process() returned Yes
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 7] param/loadparm.c:lp_servicenumber(4068)
  lp_servicenumber: couldn't find homes
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
[2003/11/21 20:49:18, 5] lib/charcnv.c:charset_name(74)
  

[Samba] Samba and printers and god knows what else...

[Joe Cipale]

Okay.. this is REALLY starting to p*** me off here!

Attached is my smb.conf file:
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1)
# Date: 2003/11/21 18:09:25

# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = PENGUINIX
guest account = guest
wins support = Yes

[joec]
comment = Personal network share
path = /home/joec/smb_share
read only = No

[peggyc]
comment = Personal network share
path = /home/peggyc/smb_share
read only = No

[printer1]
path = /var/spool/lp1
hosts allow = 192.168.2.101
min print space = 2000
printable = Yes
printing = bsd
print command = /usr/bin/lpr -P%p -r %s

I can see my (printer/disk) shares on linux land and from w2k land.

When I go to my w2k box, I can see the printer (printer1), and I have
the correct printer drivers installed. When I double click on the icon
to try a test page, I get the following error:
printer1 on Clyde Access Denied, unable to connect

When I attmept to test through smbclient, I get:
smb: \ print quay.txt
Error opening local file quay.txt

The previous fix sent to me to check the Adobe drivers had no effect.
This is simply an access/permissions issue. I am using BSD as my printer
spool mechanism.

Any suggestions? 

Joe
-- 
#--#
#Don't fear the penguin! #
#--#
# Registered Linux user: #309247 http://counter.li.org #
#--#
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Samba and Swat Installation Question

[Clint Cu]

Hi group

I followed the how to to install SAMBA  directly from the website. I 
download the
latest source file,compile, and install it. My
question is where does the smb.conf resides? I look
all the samba directories and i don't find it. Should i make it from a
scratch or load the one that comes with the
distro(RH9).Also on SWAT what can cause this a error connection refused 
when
atempting to contact localhost?

Thanks in advance
Clint
_
Is there a gadget-lover on your gift list?  MSN Shopping has lined up some 
good bets!  http://shopping.msn.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] information

[VERDAVAINNE Sophie - NTR]

Hello,

I have samba 2.0.7 installed  on AIX4.3.3.
I have 2 bugs :
- the first is that I can't transfer large file (more than 4GB) : I've seen
there is a bug and patch
- the second one is a secure pb referenced by a colleague : a root access on
the destination machine

Are these 2 problems corrected on version 2.2.8a ?

Thanks for your help.

Sophie VERDAVAINNE

NIS
SchlumbergerSema
*:  01.46.14.50.29
Fax  :  01.46.14.48.10
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Re: Part of samba manual not clear (fwd)

[John H Terpstra]

Folks,

Please make sure that all resolutions get posted to the samba mailing list
so that others can find this information later.

- John T.
-- 
John H Terpstra
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:14:05 +0100
From: Carl Ekman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John H Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Part of samba manual not clear

 setting. This means that if you do not want any roaming profiles you must
 set the values to the empty string. ie:
 logon home =
 logon path =

Thanks!! It works perfectly.

 To get rid of the error message, you must manually remove the
 cached profile from the workstation. After this is done, when the user
 logs on again, a new local profile will be created.

Thanks!! My previous messy settings had at least forced the workstations
to create local profiles, so this was not a problem. I guess that it is
also possible to convert the roaming profiles to local profiles in the
System setting dialog?

 Still writing. :-)

:) Yeah! It helps a lot.

Regards,
Carl Ekman
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Re: samba + winbindd with NT-DC problem... i'm stuck.

[leopardb]

Björn Andersen wrote:

Hello Group,

I'm really stuck here.  I try to get an samba to authenticate it's users
nicely
against an NT-DC, which will later be upgraded to W2K or W2K3
My system : Suse 8.1, samba-2.2.5-80, samba-client-2.2.5-80

My test-config for smb:
[global]
   winbind separator = +
   winbind cache time = 0
   template shell = /bin/bash
   template homedir = /home/%D/%U
   winbind uid = 1-2
   winbind gid = 1-2
   workgroup = FOERDE
   security = domain
   encrypt passwords = Yes
   password server = SMSERVER SERVER01
[daten]
   path = /srv/samba/daten
   writeable = no
   write list = root FOERDE+300
   valid users = root 300 FOERDE+300 @FOERDE+218
winbindd runs as daemon, wbinfo -u and  wbinfo -g  gives the right
domain users  groups,
as well as getent group  and   getent passwd.
strangely even ...
 # wbinfo -a foerde+300%password
works with an output of...
 plaintext password authentication succeeded
 error code was NT_STATUS_OK (0x0)
 challenge/response password authentication succeeded
 error code was NT_STATUS_OK (0x0)
I inserted in /etc/nsswitch.conf
 passwd: files winbind
 group:  files winbind
 shadow: files winbind nis
to activate winbind. I have not changed anything in PAM because I only need
Domain Users
to access Win-Shares, not to login or anything else.
But with ... :
 web1-50:~ # smbclient //web3-77/daten -U 300 -W foerde
i only get this output... :
 added interface ip=150.10.30.50 bcast=150.10.30.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
 added interface ip=10.1.110.20 bcast=10.1.110.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
 Password: *
 Domain=[FOERDE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.5]
 tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
Logfiles :
messages: nothing
log.winbind : nothing
log.smbd : nothing
log.nmbd : nothing
With a wrong PW i get logentries Error was NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD.
which seems right. But nothing with right PW. Sadly no logon as well. My
Testuser is 300,
as you can see i tryed some different syntax for user in smb.conf as well as
in smbclient. No good.
What am I doing wrong ? Especially because wbinfo -a works, I thought I
was quite close.
But I didn't make any progress for days now..
What did I forget ?
Please Help..

Björn Andersen



 

I've exactly the same problem. Did you receive any answer ?

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Re: samba + winbindd with NT-DC problem... i'm stuck.

[Leandro Ariel Gomez Chavarria]

I think your problem is this:
  passwd: files winbind
  group:  files winbind
  shadow: files winbind nis

the correct modification for nsswitch is 
 passwd: files winbind
 group:  files winbind
 shadow: files nis

DON'T put winbind in shadow line!

then try with getenet passwd or getent group and you should see all
users in /etc/passwd and after them domain users.

let me know if it works 

good luck, leandro.-

 leopardb [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/21/03 07:30am 
Björn Andersen wrote:

Hello Group,

I'm really stuck here.  I try to get an samba to authenticate it's
users
nicely
against an NT-DC, which will later be upgraded to W2K or W2K3

My system : Suse 8.1, samba-2.2.5-80, samba-client-2.2.5-80

My test-config for smb:
[global]
winbind separator = +
winbind cache time = 0
template shell = /bin/bash
template homedir = /home/%D/%U
winbind uid = 1-2
winbind gid = 1-2
workgroup = FOERDE
security = domain
encrypt passwords = Yes
password server = SMSERVER SERVER01
[daten]
path = /srv/samba/daten
writeable = no
write list = root FOERDE+300
valid users = root 300 FOERDE+300 @FOERDE+218

winbindd runs as daemon, wbinfo -u and  wbinfo -g  gives the
right
domain users  groups,
as well as getent group  and   getent passwd.
strangely even ...
  # wbinfo -a foerde+300%password
works with an output of...
  plaintext password authentication succeeded
  error code was NT_STATUS_OK (0x0)
  challenge/response password authentication succeeded
  error code was NT_STATUS_OK (0x0)

I inserted in /etc/nsswitch.conf
  passwd: files winbind
  group:  files winbind
  shadow: files winbind nis
to activate winbind. I have not changed anything in PAM because I only
need
Domain Users
to access Win-Shares, not to login or anything else.
But with ... :
  web1-50:~ # smbclient //web3-77/daten -U 300 -W foerde
i only get this output... :
  added interface ip=150.10.30.50 bcast=150.10.30.255
nmask=255.255.255.0
  added interface ip=10.1.110.20 bcast=10.1.110.255
nmask=255.255.255.0
  Password: *
  Domain=[FOERDE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.5]
  tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD

Logfiles :
messages: nothing
log.winbind : nothing
log.smbd : nothing
log.nmbd : nothing

With a wrong PW i get logentries Error was
NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD.
which seems right. But nothing with right PW. Sadly no logon as well.
My
Testuser is 300,
as you can see i tryed some different syntax for user in smb.conf as
well as
in smbclient. No good.

What am I doing wrong ? Especially because wbinfo -a works, I
thought I
was quite close.
But I didn't make any progress for days now..
What did I forget ?

Please Help..

Björn Andersen




  

I've exactly the same problem. Did you receive any answer ?


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Re: samba + winbindd with NT-DC problem... i'm stuck.

[leopardb]

Leandro Ariel Gomez Chavarria wrote:

I think your problem is this:
 

passwd: files winbind
group:  files winbind
shadow: files winbind nis
   

the correct modification for nsswitch is 
passwd: files winbind
group:  files winbind
shadow: files nis

DON'T put winbind in shadow line!

then try with getenet passwd or getent group and you should see all
users in /etc/passwd and after them domain users.
let me know if it works 

good luck, leandro.-

 

leopardb [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/21/03 07:30am 
   

Björn Andersen wrote:

 

Hello Group,

I'm really stuck here.  I try to get an samba to authenticate it's
   

users
 

nicely
against an NT-DC, which will later be upgraded to W2K or W2K3
My system : Suse 8.1, samba-2.2.5-80, samba-client-2.2.5-80

My test-config for smb:
[global]
  winbind separator = +
  winbind cache time = 0
  template shell = /bin/bash
  template homedir = /home/%D/%U
  winbind uid = 1-2
  winbind gid = 1-2
  workgroup = FOERDE
  security = domain
  encrypt passwords = Yes
  password server = SMSERVER SERVER01
[daten]
  path = /srv/samba/daten
  writeable = no
  write list = root FOERDE+300
  valid users = root 300 FOERDE+300 @FOERDE+218
winbindd runs as daemon, wbinfo -u and  wbinfo -g  gives the
   

right
 

domain users  groups,
as well as getent group  and   getent passwd.
strangely even ...
# wbinfo -a foerde+300%password
works with an output of...
plaintext password authentication succeeded
error code was NT_STATUS_OK (0x0)
challenge/response password authentication succeeded
error code was NT_STATUS_OK (0x0)
I inserted in /etc/nsswitch.conf
passwd: files winbind
group:  files winbind
shadow: files winbind nis
to activate winbind. I have not changed anything in PAM because I only
   

need
 

Domain Users
to access Win-Shares, not to login or anything else.
But with ... :
web1-50:~ # smbclient //web3-77/daten -U 300 -W foerde
i only get this output... :
added interface ip=150.10.30.50 bcast=150.10.30.255
   

nmask=255.255.255.0
 

added interface ip=10.1.110.20 bcast=10.1.110.255
   

nmask=255.255.255.0
 

Password: *
Domain=[FOERDE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.5]
tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
Logfiles :
messages: nothing
log.winbind : nothing
log.smbd : nothing
log.nmbd : nothing
With a wrong PW i get logentries Error was
   

NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD.
 

which seems right. But nothing with right PW. Sadly no logon as well.
   

My
 

Testuser is 300,
as you can see i tryed some different syntax for user in smb.conf as
   

well as
 

in smbclient. No good.

What am I doing wrong ? Especially because wbinfo -a works, I
   

thought I
 

was quite close.
But I didn't make any progress for days now..
What did I forget ?
Please Help..

Björn Andersen





   

I've exactly the same problem. Did you receive any answer ?

 

Thx for your answer

btw the solution is to get rid of the line valid users = %S in smb.conf...
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

CVS update: samba

[Alexander Bokovoy]

Date:   Fri Nov 21 10:54:33 2003
Author: ab

Update of /home/cvs/samba
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3208

Modified Files:
  Tag: SAMBA_3_0
WHATSNEW.txt 
Log Message:
Update WHATSNEW.txt with text from release branch

Revisions:
WHATSNEW.txt1.52.2.48 = 1.52.2.49

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/WHATSNEW.txt.diff?r1=1.52.2.48r2=1.52.2.49

CVS update: samba-docs/docbook

[Alexander Bokovoy]

Date:   Fri Nov 21 11:30:47 2003
Author: ab

Update of /home/cvs/samba-docs/docbook
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv7687

Modified Files:
Makefile.in configure.in 
Log Message:
Allow to build documentation as Plucker documents. Patch from Jimmy Hedman jimmy DOT 
hedman AT southpole DOT se

Revisions:
Makefile.in 1.51 = 1.52

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba-docs/docbook/Makefile.in.diff?r1=1.51r2=1.52
configure.in1.13 = 1.14

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba-docs/docbook/configure.in.diff?r1=1.13r2=1.14

CVS update: samba-docs/docbook

[Alexander Bokovoy]

Date:   Fri Nov 21 11:45:36 2003
Author: ab

Update of /home/cvs/samba-docs/docbook
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9585

Modified Files:
Makefile.in configure.in 
Log Message:
Add help for plucker target. Add safe substitute for the case when plucker-build does 
not exist so that build does not fail

Revisions:
Makefile.in 1.52 = 1.53

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba-docs/docbook/Makefile.in.diff?r1=1.52r2=1.53
configure.in1.14 = 1.15

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba-docs/docbook/configure.in.diff?r1=1.14r2=1.15

CVS update: samba4/source/librpc/ndr

[tridge]

Date:   Fri Nov 21 13:14:03 2003
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/librpc/ndr
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19413

Modified Files:
libndr.h ndr.c ndr_basic.c 
Log Message:

* changed the way strings are handled in pidl to a much more general
  interface. We now support an arbitrary set of flags to each parser,
  and these can be used to control the string types. I have provided
  some common IDL string types in librpc/idl/idl_types.h which needs to
  be included in every IDL file.

* added IDL for the endpoint mapper. Added a test suite that enumerates
  all endpoints on the server.


Revisions:
libndr.h1.25 = 1.26

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/librpc/ndr/libndr.h.diff?r1=1.25r2=1.26
ndr.c   1.21 = 1.22

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/librpc/ndr/ndr.c.diff?r1=1.21r2=1.22
ndr_basic.c 1.29 = 1.30

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/librpc/ndr/ndr_basic.c.diff?r1=1.29r2=1.30

CVS update: samba4/source/torture

[tridge]

Date:   Fri Nov 21 13:14:11 2003
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/torture
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19476

Modified Files:
torture.c 
Log Message:

* changed the way strings are handled in pidl to a much more general
  interface. We now support an arbitrary set of flags to each parser,
  and these can be used to control the string types. I have provided
  some common IDL string types in librpc/idl/idl_types.h which needs to
  be included in every IDL file.

* added IDL for the endpoint mapper. Added a test suite that enumerates
  all endpoints on the server.


Revisions:
torture.c   1.22 = 1.23

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/torture/torture.c.diff?r1=1.22r2=1.23

CVS update: samba4/source/torture/rpc

[tridge]

Date:   Fri Nov 21 13:14:17 2003
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/torture/rpc
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19550

Modified Files:
samr.c 
Added Files:
epmapper.c 
Log Message:

* changed the way strings are handled in pidl to a much more general
  interface. We now support an arbitrary set of flags to each parser,
  and these can be used to control the string types. I have provided
  some common IDL string types in librpc/idl/idl_types.h which needs to
  be included in every IDL file.

* added IDL for the endpoint mapper. Added a test suite that enumerates
  all endpoints on the server.


Revisions:
epmapper.c  NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/torture/rpc/epmapper.c?rev=1.1
samr.c  1.28 = 1.29

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/torture/rpc/samr.c.diff?r1=1.28r2=1.29

CVS update: samba4/source/torture/rpc

[tridge]

Date:   Fri Nov 21 13:27:58 2003
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/torture/rpc
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv21084

Modified Files:
epmapper.c 
Log Message:
print out the UUIDs from the end point mapper



Revisions:
epmapper.c  1.1 = 1.2

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/torture/rpc/epmapper.c.diff?r1=1.1r2=1.2

CVS update: samba/source/param

[jerry]

Date:   Fri Nov 21 19:11:49 2003
Author: jerry

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/param
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31143/param

Modified Files:
  Tag: SAMBA_3_0
loadparm.c 
Log Message:
make sure we don't append the ldap suffix when writing out the ldap XXX suffix values 
in SWAT; based on tpot's original patch; bug 328

Revisions:
loadparm.c  1.397.2.107 = 1.397.2.108

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/param/loadparm.c.diff?r1=1.397.2.107r2=1.397.2.108

CVS update: samba/source/param

[jerry]

Date:   Fri Nov 21 19:12:33 2003
Author: jerry

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/param
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31223/param

Modified Files:
loadparm.c 
Log Message:
make sure we don't append the ldap suffix when writing out the ldap XXX suffix values 
in SWAT; based on tpot's original patch; bug 328

Revisions:
loadparm.c  1.521 = 1.522

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/param/loadparm.c.diff?r1=1.521r2=1.522

CVS update: samba/source/param

[jra]

Date:   Fri Nov 21 19:20:08 2003
Author: jra

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/param
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv32016/param

Modified Files:
  Tag: SAMBA_3_0
loadparm.c 
Log Message:
Fix Jerry's no-proto bug :-).
Jeremy.


Revisions:
loadparm.c  1.397.2.108 = 1.397.2.109

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/param/loadparm.c.diff?r1=1.397.2.108r2=1.397.2.109

CVS update: samba/source/param

[jra]

Date:   Fri Nov 21 19:20:51 2003
Author: jra

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/param
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv32187/param

Modified Files:
loadparm.c 
Log Message:
Fix Jerry's no-proto bug :-).
Jeremy.


Revisions:
loadparm.c  1.522 = 1.523

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/param/loadparm.c.diff?r1=1.522r2=1.523

CVS update: samba4/source/librpc/idl

[tridge]

Date:   Fri Nov 21 21:25:03 2003
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/librpc/idl
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14588

Added Files:
idl_types.h 
Log Message:
forgot to commit this, sorry

Revisions:
idl_types.h NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/librpc/idl/idl_types.h?rev=1.1

CVS update: samba4/source/librpc/idl

[tridge]

Date:   Fri Nov 21 21:25:48 2003
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/librpc/idl
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14821

Modified Files:
.cvsignore 
Log Message:
don't ignore .h files here

Revisions:
.cvsignore  1.2 = 1.3

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/librpc/idl/.cvsignore.diff?r1=1.2r2=1.3

CVS update: samba4/source/librpc/ndr

[tridge]

Date:   Fri Nov 21 22:00:01 2003
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/librpc/ndr
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19368

Modified Files:
ndr.c 
Log Message:
cleaner handling of relative pointers to strings




Revisions:
ndr.c   1.22 = 1.23

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/librpc/ndr/ndr.c.diff?r1=1.22r2=1.23

CVS update: samba4/source/torture

[tridge]

Date:   Fri Nov 21 22:00:38 2003
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/torture
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19549

Modified Files:
torture.c 
Log Message:
fix a smbtorture memory leak





Revisions:
torture.c   1.23 = 1.24

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/torture/torture.c.diff?r1=1.23r2=1.24

CVS update: samba4/source/build/pidl

[tridge]

Date:   Fri Nov 21 22:34:45 2003
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/build/pidl
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv23485

Modified Files:
parser.pm 
Log Message:
fixed a bug with pushing non-pointer unions






Revisions:
parser.pm   1.46 = 1.47

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/build/pidl/parser.pm.diff?r1=1.46r2=1.47