Re: Fw: Samba 3 Binaries
Hi! On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 08:53:05AM +0200, Hannu Virtanen wrote: Now You have Samba 3.0.2, but no UNIX Samba 3 binaries. Are these binaries coming and when. Why do You not answer. I am interesting of SGI IRIX version. The problem is that none of us uses IRIX on a daily basis, so we personally don't have a strong enough need to create those packages. When you have problems compiling it yourself that can be tracked down to bad Samba code, you will definitely find help here or on the other mailing lists. We always want to make sure that Samba compiles on as many platforms as possible. Volker Lendecke pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Fw: Samba 3 Binaries
Volker, I feel this is, what i imagined, Samba is Linux software in the future(version 3). My problem is, i do not have compilers, nor do i want to learn all the compile options. I feel to base my samba use for binary packages and think that it is not good development(Billy Gates loves things like this) not to have binary packages(none after version 2). Have to ask SGIs(somekind sponsor of samba.org) opinion. Best regards Hannu Virtanen - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Hannu Virtanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 10:29 AM Subject: Re: Fw: Samba 3 Binaries
Re: Fw: Samba 3 Binaries
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:29:07AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem is that none of us uses IRIX on a daily basis, so we personally don't have a strong enough need to create those packages. SGI create a Samba for IRIX product based on the main Samba code tree, once it has passed their internal Q/A. Similar to what HP do with CIFS/9000. Jeremy.
[Samba] Thank you for your comments!
Thank you for writing to SparkNotes! Emails like yours have helped make SparkNotes the most popular study guides on the planet. With your input in mind, we constantly try to improve our website and our books. We actually read all of your emails and pay attention to what you tell us. So, thanks for supporting SparkNotes! The SparkNotes Team -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba PDC 3.0.2 + Win 2K SP4
try running testparm -v is it configured as server role: pdc or bdc ?? also, try the add machine script = script for adding machines.. what password backend do you use (passwd??) it a little bit vage.. - Collen Blijenberg (Systeem/Netwerk Beheerder) Montessori Lyceum Herman Jordan Zeist Tuesday, February 10, 2004, 9:48:43 PM, you wrote: TFGF Hello there, TFGF I´m trying to configure my server to be a PDC for my LAN, but I´m having TFGF troubles to join to domain. TFGF My smb.conf: TFGF # Global parameters TFGF [global] TFGF workgroup = SAOPAULO TFGF netbios aliases = SERVERSP TFGF server string = Servidor de Arquivos Sao Paulo(PDC) - Samba server %v TFGF hosts equiv = /etc/hosts TFGF smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd TFGF username map = /etc/samba/smbusers TFGF log level = 1 TFGF log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m TFGF max log size = 100 TFGF name resolve order = host wins bcast TFGF time server = Yes TFGF socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 TFGF hostname lookups = Yes TFGF load printers = No TFGF printcap name = cups TFGF add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -n -g w2k -c Estacao -d /dev/null -s TFGF /bin/false %m$ TFGF delete user script = /usr/sbin/userdel %m$ | /usr/sbin/smbpasswd -x %m$ TFGF logon path = \\%L\profiles TFGF logon drive = Z: TFGF logon home = \\%L\profiles TFGF domain logons = Yes TFGF os level = 200 TFGF domain master = Yes TFGF dns proxy = No TFGF wins support = Yes TFGF admin users = root TFGF hosts allow = 192.168.1., 127. TFGF [netlogon] TFGF comment = Network Logon Service TFGF path = /home/netlogon TFGF read only = No TFGF create mask = 0777 TFGF force create mode = 0777 TFGF guest ok = Yes TFGF [profiles] TFGF comment = %u TFGF path = /home/%u/profile TFGF read only = No TFGF create mask = 0777 TFGF force create mode = 0770 TFGF [publico] TFGF comment = Arquivos pblicos TFGF path = /home/pulico TFGF valid users = @users TFGF write list = @users TFGF read only = No TFGF create mask = 0777 TFGF force create mode = 0777 TFGF force directory mode = 0777 TFGF guest ok = Yes TFGF I already created the machine account(machine$) added to smbpasswd -a -m TFGF machine$ but my W2k does not join to the domain. TFGF The W2K error: TFGF The specified error occured when trying to join to domain SAOPAULO: TFGF The specified domain does not exists or it cannot be contacted. TFGF This message was translated from Portuguese, maybe have some divergences. TFGF Thanks a lot, TFGF Tercio F. Gaudencio Filho TFGF Cosa Intermáquinas - São Paulo - Brasil -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re[2]: [Samba] Login time logging?
hmm.. i just made the utmp (who, last)
it show's the online users, but it doesn't
resolve the ip adress to netbios name.. ??
also (maybe same prob here), when i use /log.%m
the log files appear whith machine names (this is normal)
but it also generate logfile's with ip nr's (eg. log.192.168.2.50)
i use wins en bcast to resolve names..
is there still some bug where hostnames don't resolve correct ??
and how can i make utmp show netbios names ??
l8r
-
Collen Blijenberg (Systeem/Netwerk Beheerder)
Montessori Lyceum
Herman Jordan
Zeist
Monday, February 2, 2004, 9:16:14 AM, you wrote:
RB I just tried using the netlogon share to see whether certain machines come
RB up on the net.
RB The problem is that only machines that are running Win9x appear, anything
RB more modern like XP clients do not seem to connect to netlogon? There is
RB no entry in the log at least.
RB On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 23:49, Remco Barendse wrote:
Hi all!
I need a setup that will log exactly when a user has logged in or out of
samba.
Preferably I would like to have a separate list per user, but this can
also be achieved with grep.
I found some solutions that rely on login script processing which is
nice
if your clients are running Win95/Win98 but for anything else it won't
work.
Anybody know of a solution?
Many people enable utmp support on the server for this.
I have in [netlogon] a
root preexec = /usr/local/samba/bin/netlogon-preexec.sh %u %I %m %T
shell-script which does:
#!/bin/sh
#Parameters:
#1.: user, %u
#2.: Client-IP, %I
#3.: NetBIOS Machine name, %m
#4/5.: Timestamp, %T
#6.: Group, %g
#4/5 (Timestamp) are no longer used
/samba/netlogon/generateLoginBatch $1 $2 $3
echo insert into logins (user, host, ip, date, time) values ('$1', '$3',
'$2', curdate(), curtime() ); | /usr/bin/mysql -u mysqlUser sambaLogins
Windows does (AFAIK) not have the concept of logout-scripts, so you'll
never know when people log out. When I have spare time I sometimes
generate a little machine-usage report from that data.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] massive performance problems if transferring many small files
Are all/many of these files in the same directory? Yes, it's a flat directory hierarchy. Because unix is case sensitive, and windows is not, this is almost a pathalogical case for Samba. Samba must scan the *entire* directory, to see if there is a matching file (of potentially different case), so it can say 'sorry, file by that name already'. Naturally, this isn't exactly fast as you approach 27000 files... I would suggest that Samba 3.0 might handle this situation better, or in 2.2 set 'mangle method = hash2'. I'll try it The hash2 method is not only much faster, it has a much lower collision rate. This helps if for some reason, the 8.3 names are being used. If you can put the files into a hierarchy, then things will be *much* better. Or, for this copy only, you might want to turn 'case sensitive = yes' on in your smb.conf - however the implications of that are nasty for normal windows operations (and perhaps even the copy, depending on what you use). You did suggest to try Samba 3 - I did it. My test environment consists of a PC (Pentium 4 2.4 GHz CPU and 512 MB RAM), a SUN Blade 100 (500 MHz CPU, 256 MB RAM) and between both a switched network at a speed of 100 MBit/s. The smb.conf is the same as I mentioned in my initially posting. Unfortunately I couldn't recognize any significant difference between Samba 2.2.8a and Samba 3.0.1 :-( Now the good news! If I change the option 'preserve case' to 'yes' the transfer rate increases by about 550% and that's really ok. I don't expect any problems in this case because the source data I want to transfer are lower case at all and UNIX-like. What do you mean with nasty implications? At the moment I can't imagine a case. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] PAM_unix[171]: (samba) session closed for user taisan
Hi, 1 I got message The specified network name is no longer available show on PC/Win2000 when copy large files to ARM9 base NAS(with SAMBA 2.2.8 + Linux Kennel 2.4.18) file size is correct but content appended with all 0 in ARM9 NAS HDD. 2. At the console of ARM9 NAS show : . [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var# . smbd[170]: PAM _pam_init_handlers: no default config /etc/pam.d/other PAM_unix[170]: (samba) session closed for user taisan smbd[171]: PAM _pam_init_handlers: no default config /etc/pam.d/other PAM_unix[171]: (samba) session closed for user taisan PAM_unix[218]: (samba) session opened for user taisan by (uid=0) PAM_unix[219]: (samba) session opened for user taisan by (uid=0) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var# seems session closed re open a new session make file copy incomplete (appended with 0) could help ? /Taisan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] lp_servicenumber: couldn't find qstpfbl
Hello, Some questions : - Can anyone could explain this message : [2004/01/26 12:40:57, 7] param/loadparm.c:lp_servicenumber(4060) lp_servicenumber: couldn't find qstpfbl [2004/01/26 12:40:57, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_add_printer(2394) adding printer service qstpfbl qstpfbl is a printer - Why sometimes a windows 2000 server (SP4) which is a member server of my DOMAIN could not be available on network (Internal server error) ? - When I restart smb daemon (/etc/rc.d/init.d/smb restart), the system not restart correctly, but if i do : /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb stop, wait 1 second, /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb stop, samba work fine ! The message asked in my first question can be the answer ? Thank you Stéphane Purnelle --- Stéphane PURNELLE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Service Informatique Corman S.A. Tel : 00 32 087/342467 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 2.2.3a + Win 2K
I'm new to the list, so at the begining I'd like to say Hello to all of You. I'm using Samba 2.2.3a and rather cannot upgrade it to new version. I want to set up sambafax (http://www.purpel3.com/sambafax/ ) tool to allow my windows users to send fax. Actually my smb.conf looks like this: security = share guest ok = true guest account = test [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/lpd/lp browseable = no printable = yes public = yes writeable = no create mode = 0700 directory = /tmp [folder] # shared folder path = /var/folder volume = Share writeable = no guest ok = true comment = Shared folder browseable = yes ...and it's all that I needed till now. When windows user print on fax printer, he is authenticated as test and cannot get the notification about his job. I know that I should change security=user, but the problem is that my windows users work on terminal servers and are authenticated by radius server and have dynamic passwords (generated by token). What should I do to get the correct username, and allow only selected users to print on that printer. Best regards Marcin -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] re SAMBA
HI, i cant log on as a normal user to samba server. when i logon in the logon- dialog box instead it brings back the logon-dialog box.. i can't find any error log abt this. ANY advice is highly appreciated. Thanks for yo attention. Rgds, Segie -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] re SAMBA
Hi, documents created using open office on SuSE can't be read on a windows machine. instead you see characters that are not user friendly AM waitingto hear from you. I appriciate your advice. Rgds. Segie -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem with samba at startup
Hi all, I have configured samba as a PDC server, and it works fine, but when the server restart, samba was launched, but if i do an nmblookup on my PDC server, it doesn't find it I think the problem is from nmb, but i didn't find why... If i restart samba, every think works fine... Any idea? Thanks. _ Patrice RABY-Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GARGUL STUDIO - 20 Av d'Aquitaine 13600 La Ciotat Tél (+33) 612 583 594 - Fax (+33) 442 081 605 http://www.gargul-studio.com _ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] machine account with strange behaviour
I'm running samba-3.0.1-2 on a redhat machine. it acts as a pdc for our domain. clients are w2k machines. when administering the w2k boxes via the mmc one of the machine accounts shows up in the domain users list. it is shown together with it's ending $. I removed the machine from the domain and added it back however the effect stays. Additionally it is *sometimes* not possible to map drives to shares on that machine. Users receive a message that no error message was found or sometimes that an unknown internal windows 2000 error has occured. The machine account was created manually just the same way all the others were made. It's line in /etc/passwd is completely unsuspicous. Any help would be appreciated! best regards, Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] groups mapping problem
Hi the list, I have a samba 2.2.8a running with ldap authentication. but when I'm browsing the domain account I can see all the users but only 2 groups : Domain Admins and Domain users... How can I add all my other groups on the domain too ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpcclient //SAMBA-FS -U administrator -c enumdomgroups Password: cmd = enumdomgroups group:[Domain Admins] rid:[0x200] group:[Domain Users] rid:[0x201] [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpcclient //SPAMBA-FS -U administrator -c enumalsgroups dom ain Password: cmd = enumalsgroups domain group:[sys] rid:[0x3ef] group:[tty] rid:[0x3f3] group:[disk] rid:[0x3f5] group:[mem] rid:[0x3f9] group:[kmem] rid:[0x3fb] group:[wheel] rid:[0x3fd] group:[man] rid:[0x407] group:[dip] rid:[0x439] group:[lock] rid:[0x455] group:[users] rid:[0x4b1] group:[utmp] rid:[0x415] group:[floppy] rid:[0x40f] group:[slocate] rid:[0x413] group:[ARCserve] rid:[0x1775] group:[uagent] rid:[0x1771] group:[Domain Admins] rid:[0x579] group:[Domain Users] rid:[0x57b] group:[Domain Computers] rid:[0x83b] group:[Printers] rid:[0x226cb] group:[Operators] rid:[0x226c9] group:[BCH_Users] rid:[0xc73d] Thanks in advance, Best regards, Fred. - (o- //\Linux Rules V_/_ No HTML in emails - -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Fwd: [Samba] machine account with strange behaviour
Hi Oliver, My opinion is that try delleting the machine name using the 'control center' and delete the machine account in the passwd file. Then add the machine name again using control center, edit creat users , then In console add the machine using: # smbpasswd -a -m machinename. Note i managed to do this on SuSE 8.1. Please send me an email if u're thru Rgds, Segie. -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: [Samba] machine account with strange behaviour Date: 11 Feb 2004 08:59:53 UT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm running samba-3.0.1-2 on a redhat machine. it acts as a pdc for our domain. clients are w2k machines. when administering the w2k boxes via the mmc one of the machine accounts shows up in the domain users list. it is shown together with it's ending $. I removed the machine from the domain and added it back however the effect stays. Additionally it is *sometimes* not possible to map drives to shares on that machine. Users receive a message that no error message was found or sometimes that an unknown internal windows 2000 error has occured. The machine account was created manually just the same way all the others were made. It's line in /etc/passwd is completely unsuspicous. Any help would be appreciated! best regards, Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba --- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Fwd: samba problem
Hi samba-technical, i installed samba propely and configured it as a domain server of my LAN , and at the same time as a gateway (with a firewall) to the Internet. Initially before configuring the firewall and connecting to the internet, samba was working properly. But after connecting to the intrenet and activating the firewall samba couldn't work i'll be gratefull for your advice Thanks Rgds, Segie --- --- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Winbind problems
Can someone please send me a copy of their /etc/pam.d/login, system-auth files for redhat/fedora. I need to get winbind working and when I upgraded to samba 3 I forgot to copy them and now I can no longer auith via winbind. wbinfo -u works fine as does -g but my login files are wrong. Kind Regards -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] SLES8 + SAMBA + LDAP conf files
Hi Samba folks, Im new for linux and samba so sorry if i ask to much, but can anyone send me working config files for %subj ? Thanks in advice WBR, Ruslanas Cechovskis UAB Forbis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: Fwd: [Samba] machine account with strange behaviour
thanks for the hint! I did the following: In smbpasswd the machine account had flags WU. I removed the U flag and now it's no longer listed in the mmc. I'm monitoring the problem with the shares and will report later on... cheers, Oliver Original Message Subject: Fwd: [Samba] machine account with strange behaviour (11-Feb-2004 11:14) From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Oliver, My opinion is that try delleting the machine name using the 'control center' and delete the machine account in the passwd file. Then add the machine name again using control center, edit creat users , then In console add the machine using: # smbpasswd -a -m machinename. Note i managed to do this on SuSE 8.1. Please send me an email if u're thru Rgds, Segie. -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: [Samba] machine account with strange behaviour Date: 11 Feb 2004 08:59:53 UT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm running samba-3.0.1-2 on a redhat machine. it acts as a pdc for our domain. clients are w2k machines. when administering the w2k boxes via the mmc one of the machine accounts shows up in the domain users list. it is shown together with it's ending $. I removed the machine from the domain and added it back however the effect stays. Additionally it is *sometimes* not possible to map drives to shares on that machine. Users receive a message that no error message was found or sometimes that an unknown internal windows 2000 error has occured. The machine account was created manually just the same way all the others were made. It's line in /etc/passwd is completely unsuspicous. Any help would be appreciated! best regards, Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba --- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Error starting samba
Dear All, I am about as basic a user as you can get, so I apologise for my ignorance. I have been running samba happily for three years or so, but now suddenly I have a problem at boot. I get an error message neighbour table overflow, and samba refuses then to function. I can still ping other computers on the network. This may not be a samba problem, but if I restart the samba service, I get the same errors immediately. Has anyone seen this before or have any idea how to cure it? Many thanks for any help received. Yours Jonathan --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 06/02/2004 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: school PDC questions
Thanks for the many answers. Do you also have an idea of the hardware needed? (100 pc's, maybe 150, for 600+ students who only need to d/l profiles and who need to access shares (print, files, home dir). Maybe intranet server too. What hardware would do a great job for this (with or without the apache for intranet) Thans! Ivo Dancet -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] 3.0.1-member-server-printing
hello list, after successfully playing around to get a working samba 3.0.1-PDC-LDAP-Suse9 configuration a new challenge takes place : scenario: suse9 with samba 3.0.1 as a member server in a NT4 controlled domain. winbind works as expected (thanks to documention authors). There seems to be no problem with file sharing, ACL is working properly (I'm using xfs filesystem). :-) so, now the problem : printing 1.) sharing the printer(s) works ok, the only problem occurs with long and short names of Printer shares, I've named the printer queues with short names and load all printers for sharing, then gave additional shares with log names referencing the proper queue. My question, is this a passable solution ?? extract of smb.conf: ... [printers] comment = All printers printable = yes path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no guest ok = yes public = yes read only = yes writable = no printer admin = @ntadmin,DOMAIN+Administrator [hp LaserJet 2200 Series PCL6-2] printable = yes path = /var/spool/samba browseable = yes guest ok = yes public = yes read only = yes writable = no printer name = laser2200 printer admin = @ntadmin,DOMAIN+Administrator ... 2.) driver installation : I've tried to install the printer drivers for clients (win9x/2000/xp) via the APW (add printer wizard), but I've failed with access denied. If I changed the filesystem permissions in the [print$]-path in the way that the DOMAIN+Administrator is allowed to create directories and files, the driver files were copied on to the samba box. But the driver installation failed (maybe for the default properties). My question, are there other files where I've to change the permission to allow DOMAIN+Administrator write access, e.g. /var/lib/samba/ntprinters.tdb or the the subdirectory containing the *.tdb(s) for the shared printers (e.g. /var/lib/samba/printing/hp LaserJet 2200 Series PCL6-2.tdb) ?? extract of smb.file ... [print$] comment = Printer Driver Download Area path = /var/lib/samba/drivers browsable = no guest ok = yes read only = yes write list = @ntadmin,DOMAIN+Administrator,root thanks in advanced regards odi -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Winbind problems
I posted my Redhat 9.0 ones on the list a while ago, have a search for them. -Original Message- From: John Simovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 February 2004 10:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Winbind problems Can someone please send me a copy of their /etc/pam.d/login, system-auth files for redhat/fedora. I need to get winbind working and when I upgraded to samba 3 I forgot to copy them and now I can no longer auith via winbind. wbinfo -u works fine as does -g but my login files are wrong. Kind Regards -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] 3.0.1-member-server-printing
I guess your smb.conf is correct. I'm using cups on freebsd. I install cups( very easy) and I add a printer thanks to the webinterface. I print a test page. After that I upload the drivers in the print$ share by a little bit tricky way. I log to my domain with root (added with pdbedit...-u root) on my Windows 2000 client ( It is the only case you shoul do it!!). I browse the network, the sambaserver and go to the printers section. I right click on the printers , and properties I'm asked if I want to download the drivers on my client since no drivers are installed. You have to click no Then you go the drivers section and do as if you install new drivers. You choose in the list and it will upload the drivers on your sambaserver. It works fine!! Hope it helps Bertrand -Message d'origine- De : Manfred Odenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mercredi 11 février 2004 12:01 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : [Samba] 3.0.1-member-server-printing hello list, after successfully playing around to get a working samba 3.0.1-PDC-LDAP-Suse9 configuration a new challenge takes place : scenario: suse9 with samba 3.0.1 as a member server in a NT4 controlled domain. winbind works as expected (thanks to documention authors). There seems to be no problem with file sharing, ACL is working properly (I'm using xfs filesystem). :-) so, now the problem : printing 1.) sharing the printer(s) works ok, the only problem occurs with long and short names of Printer shares, I've named the printer queues with short names and load all printers for sharing, then gave additional shares with log names referencing the proper queue. My question, is this a passable solution ?? extract of smb.conf: ... [printers] comment = All printers printable = yes path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no guest ok = yes public = yes read only = yes writable = no printer admin = @ntadmin,DOMAIN+Administrator [hp LaserJet 2200 Series PCL6-2] printable = yes path = /var/spool/samba browseable = yes guest ok = yes public = yes read only = yes writable = no printer name = laser2200 printer admin = @ntadmin,DOMAIN+Administrator ... 2.) driver installation : I've tried to install the printer drivers for clients (win9x/2000/xp) via the APW (add printer wizard), but I've failed with access denied. If I changed the filesystem permissions in the [print$]-path in the way that the DOMAIN+Administrator is allowed to create directories and files, the driver files were copied on to the samba box. But the driver installation failed (maybe for the default properties). My question, are there other files where I've to change the permission to allow DOMAIN+Administrator write access, e.g. /var/lib/samba/ntprinters.tdb or the the subdirectory containing the *.tdb(s) for the shared printers (e.g. /var/lib/samba/printing/hp LaserJet 2200 Series PCL6-2.tdb) ?? extract of smb.file ... [print$] comment = Printer Driver Download Area path = /var/lib/samba/drivers browsable = no guest ok = yes read only = yes write list = @ntadmin,DOMAIN+Administrator,root thanks in advanced regards odi -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] 3.0.1-member-server-printing
Thanks for the fast reply, but the problem is that the server is a member server in a NT4 controlled domain, there is no user root (uid=0) in the domain, if there would be a samba PDC, there should be no problem with your solution. regards odi Am Mi, den 11.02.2004 schrieb Bertrand Maugain um 12:09: I guess your smb.conf is correct. I'm using cups on freebsd. I install cups( very easy) and I add a printer thanks to the webinterface. I print a test page. After that I upload the drivers in the print$ share by a little bit tricky way. I log to my domain with root (added with pdbedit...-u root) on my Windows 2000 client ( It is the only case you shoul do it!!). I browse the network, the sambaserver and go to the printers section. I right click on the printers , and properties I'm asked if I want to download the drivers on my client since no drivers are installed. You have to click no Then you go the drivers section and do as if you install new drivers. You choose in the list and it will upload the drivers on your sambaserver. It works fine!! Hope it helps Bertrand -Message d'origine- De : Manfred Odenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mercredi 11 février 2004 12:01 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : [Samba] 3.0.1-member-server-printing hello list, after successfully playing around to get a working samba 3.0.1-PDC-LDAP-Suse9 configuration a new challenge takes place : scenario: suse9 with samba 3.0.1 as a member server in a NT4 controlled domain. winbind works as expected (thanks to documention authors). There seems to be no problem with file sharing, ACL is working properly (I'm using xfs filesystem). :-) so, now the problem : printing 1.) sharing the printer(s) works ok, the only problem occurs with long and short names of Printer shares, I've named the printer queues with short names and load all printers for sharing, then gave additional shares with log names referencing the proper queue. My question, is this a passable solution ?? extract of smb.conf: ... [printers] comment = All printers printable = yes path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no guest ok = yes public = yes read only = yes writable = no printer admin = @ntadmin,DOMAIN+Administrator [hp LaserJet 2200 Series PCL6-2] printable = yes path = /var/spool/samba browseable = yes guest ok = yes public = yes read only = yes writable = no printer name = laser2200 printer admin = @ntadmin,DOMAIN+Administrator ... 2.) driver installation : I've tried to install the printer drivers for clients (win9x/2000/xp) via the APW (add printer wizard), but I've failed with access denied. If I changed the filesystem permissions in the [print$]-path in the way that the DOMAIN+Administrator is allowed to create directories and files, the driver files were copied on to the samba box. But the driver installation failed (maybe for the default properties). My question, are there other files where I've to change the permission to allow DOMAIN+Administrator write access, e.g. /var/lib/samba/ntprinters.tdb or the the subdirectory containing the *.tdb(s) for the shared printers (e.g. /var/lib/samba/printing/hp LaserJet 2200 Series PCL6-2.tdb) ?? extract of smb.file ... [print$] comment = Printer Driver Download Area path = /var/lib/samba/drivers browsable = no guest ok = yes read only = yes write list = @ntadmin,DOMAIN+Administrator,root thanks in advanced regards odi -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password length
Dear list, I have a pretty small samba setup with one samba server acting as PDC and 6 pretty diverse clients. I had no problem joining two win98 clients and one XP client and two win2000 clients to the domain. There is only one win2000 client which I simply can't join. In the samba logs I find decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password length whenever I try to join this PC using the root user. When I use just a normal domain admin user I have nothing in the Samba logs. In any case windows tells me that the user either doesn't exist or the password is incorrect. Even though I have just minutes before added two other win2000 machines with the same user. I use a tdbsam password backend. And I have tried everything I can imagine. I have changed the security channel settings of the client PC to all possible values, I have removed the passwd.tdb and secrets.tdb files, remapped groups on the server, I have even changed the IP address of the samba server. I'm using samba 3.01 on a Debian Linux Sid system. If you want to see logs or smb.conf files I will post them. I am lost please help me with new suggestions. Thank you Reinke -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] A samba locking question
Let me the try to communicate in a different way. The only thing I want to know if byte range locks or file share reservation are propagated to or from UNIX. That is: a) When a external program is doing a byte range lock through fcntl on file, will that be checked before Samba is opening the file ? My findings tells me it does. b) When a external program is doing file share reservation through on a file fcntl will that be checked before Samba is opening the file ? My findings tells me it don't. The test-program did file share reservation through fcntl on file with the parameters: f_access=F_RWACC (Set a file share reservation for read and write access) f_deny=F_RWDNY (Set a file share reservation to deny read and write) The client could through Samba open and write in that file. c) If/When Samba is doing a byte range lock on file will that byte range lock be propagated externaly to UNIX ? I believe it will not. d) If/When Samba is doing a file share reservation on file will that be propagated externaly to UNIX ? My findings tells me it don't. I don't this good or bad. I just want to know. /Patrik On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 19:18, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:39:01AM +0100, Patrik Gustavsson wrote: Well, you should know. But if Samba is doing byte ranged lock using fcntl, then I don't understand why my tests failed. The first test I did was: I simulated a NFS client and did byte range lock on a file, a document in this case 8K in size, and tried to open that from client using Samba and it failed becuse is was locked. The second test I did was: When a client opened the file using samba, with a DENY_WRITE lock (output from smbstatus) and I used the same simulated NFS client that did a byte range write lock using fcntl() on that document. I would assume that the byte range lock would fail, but it didn't it succeeded. That surprised me. You're confusing share modes with byte range locks. Read up on share modes - smbstatus doesn't report byte range locks, only share modes. Until you understand the difference we're not really communicating :-). At all :-). Jeremy. -- In a world without fences who needs Gates Patrik Gustavsson, Senior Technical Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: +46 60 671540 http://glen.swedenMobile: +46 70 3551040 SUN MICROSYSTEMS Fax: +46 60 671550 -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Hi
The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary attachment. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba access problem with Windows 98
Here is my problem. I have inside a WAN a samba server with IP 192.168.10.34 and all my remote clientes use network address like 172.20.120.0 mask 255.255.255.0. When I use a Windows NT client, there's no problem to map all the shared directories under the samba server. But, when I try to do the same thing using a W98 clients, there is no response giving me a timeout message. There is no problem wth conections between the client and the server, because ping command works. Has anyone overthere know what is wrong? Thanks in advance, _ MSc. Raphael Palomino Valverde Red Hat Certified Engineer (RHCE) --- Banco de Crédito BCP - Dedicados a hacerte la Banca más simple. Visita nuestra Banca por Internet http://www.viabcp.com --- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Quota question
What do you use as a script? On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 08:59:51AM +0100, Collen wrote: i know, just make a script and link it with dfree command = script path here in your smb.conf... works quite fine for me... l8r - Collen Blijenberg (Systeem/Netwerk Beheerder) Montessori Lyceum Herman Jordan Zeist Tuesday, February 10, 2004, 5:31:40 PM, you wrote: R I am having problems with quotas on a RH8 server. I have compiled samba R with the --with-quotas and --with-sys-quotas. If I leave the default kernel R on rh8, which is 2.4.18-4, and set the user's quota, eg 10MB, the capacity R is shown as 10MB. I compiled the newest kernel with the quota options: R CONFIG_QUOTA=y R CONFIG_QFMT_V2=y R The quotas still work, however the disk size reported as the entire capacity R of the drive. Is there a kernel option or patch or something that I can use R so that the quota is reported as the capacity. I am using samba 3.0.1. The R user's quota was reported with the default 2.4.18-3 kernel but not the R compiled 2.4.20, 2.4.21 and 2.4.23. R Please help. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- :wq! Matthew Daubenspeck http://www.oddprocess.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Access to Files on Unix host from Windows2K Host
I needed to find a way for a user, on a Windows 2000 host, to be able to access files in a filesystem on a unix host running HP-UX 11 (and Apache webserver) both of which are on the same network. The files in the directory on the unix host are open for all to read. An application on the Windows host expects to have the path for the file system (on the unix host) defined in an .ini file as follows. [Options] XREFPATHS=Drive Letter\Directory Path The Directory Path above refers to the filesystem on the unix host where the files are located. The user on the Windows host should be able to see the unix directory as a shared directory in the typical windows fashion (with Drive Letter). MyComputer - Public on 'Unix Host Name'(Drive Letter) I was recommended Samba for this purpose by the application vendor. I, therefore, downloaded and installed the following depot on the unix machine. The installation with 'swinstall' went without a hitch. samba_2.2.8a_HPUX_withwinbind.depot I created a user 'kairamr' on the unix host. This user, using network login userid and password, is on the windows host. While trying to configure Samba on HP-UX to use encrypted passwords, the following was done. The file /usr/local/samba/smbpasswd was created using the mksmbpasswd.sh script. Permissions to that file set at 600 ( only for root to read and write ) Tried to set Samba password ( separate from the unix password ) for user kairamr with smbpasswd command. I get following error message on the screen ... load_unicode_map: filename /usr/local/samba/lib/codepages/unicode_map.850 does not exist load_unicode_map: filename /usr/local/samba/lib/codepages/unicode_map.ISO8859-1 does not exist New SMB Password: ( I enter a value ) Retype new SMB Password: ( I enter the same value as above ) -- get these errors unable to open passdb database. Failed to find entry for user kairamr. Failed to modify password entry for user kairamr -- What should I do ? How can I resolve the passdb database issue ? Any help from list members working with Samba on HP-UX platform will be appreciated. Thanks Raj Kairam -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Rejoining domain after cluster failover
I haven't implemented this myself but I would assume you need to have the private directory either on a cluster shared disk or manually syncronised on each cluster node. And also hard code the netbios name and ip address that samba uses on all cluster nodes like, [global] netbios name = mysambaserver interfaces = 192.168.10.10/24 #virtual ip address thanks Andy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Patrik Gustavsson Posted At: 11 February 2004 13:33 Posted To: Samba Conversation: [Samba] Rejoining domain after cluster failover Subject: Re: [Samba] Rejoining domain after cluster failover My guess you have to upgrade to Samba 3 ? I don't think you need, if you don't want to, use the LDAP backend for SIDs? I have developed the Sun support agent for Samba on Sun Cluster (The agent should work the same way). There is no problem with Samba 3 as ADS member when the you have failover or a manully switch. /Patrik On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 22:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello. We're having issues running Samba 2.2.8-a1, on Solaris 8 (SPARC) under Veritas VCS 3.5 clustering (HA active-passive). Every time we have a cluster failover (we're testing), we have to re-join the domain [ADS not NT] (e.g., 'smbpasswd -j XYZ -r XYZPDC -UAdminRightsUser%password'). Otherwise, we cannot connect to the shares, and 'wbinfo -t' returns 'Secret is bad'. Re-joining the domain fixes the problem. It's easily enough scripted, however I don't like the idea of having a domain user's password with administrative rights in a text file. Are there other ways (HOWTO pointers welcome), or do I have to upgrade to Samba 3.0.x and use the LDAP backend for SIDs? Thanks in advance. Ken Gotsch -- In a world without fences who needs Gates Patrik Gustavsson, Senior Technical Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: +46 60 671540 http://glen.swedenMobile: +46 70 3551040 SUN MICROSYSTEMS Fax: +46 60 671550 -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Welcome to DM Direct
Thank you for subscribing to DM Direct! You have been subscribed to DM Direct with the following information MS Corporation Public Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Welcome to spam / Windows '98SE usr-lev-sec problem
:) cool :D /me ROTFL Coming back to the point, I will ask a (maybe?) naughty question: Has any of you, Ladies and Gentlemen, seen (and presumably knows HOW-TO get that) a SaMBa server behaving nicely to WindowsXP PRO SP1 clients? I could join them in a domain using 2.2.8a and 3.0.1 but not using 3.0.0, 3.0.2rc1, 3.0.2rc2 and 3.0.2 :( The message given by the WindowsXP workstation is the one concerning multiple connections to a shared resource with different credentials -- BUUUT, I do not have any mapped drives whatsoever while trying to join the domain (let alone the fact that it is the same machine and same setup as for 2.2.8a and 3.0.1 where it worked) ... Hay ANYONE got any idea whatsoever? Code pointers welcome (I speak C :) ) ... anything? -- The second problem relates with '98SE and '95OSR2 which cannot enumerate the list of domain users when creating a share. The error message is You cannot view the list of users at this time, SaMBa reports something like INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 0 on the logs ... I _have already_ done the mapi32.dll maneouver but to nu avail. Again, has anyone got any hints? It isn't that urgent ... but it is quite important ... as I'm using SaMBa at work on a quite large network ... and people started getting annoyed by this disfunctionalities in SaMBa ... and sooner or later they'll propose we switch to a native Microsoft solution :(( Thanks in advance, Radu - Eosif Mihailescu Lyris ListManager wrote: Thank you for subscribing to DM Direct! You have been subscribed to DM Direct with the following information MS Corporation Public Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 3.0.1-member-server-printing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Manfred Odenstein wrote: | I've tried to install the printer drivers for clients | (win9x/2000/xp) via the APW (add printer wizard), but | I've failed with access denied. If I changed the | filesystem permissions in the [print$]-path in the way | that the DOMAIN+Administrator is allowed to create | directories and files, the driver files were copied on to | the samba box. But the driver installation failed (maybe | for the default properties). put 'printer admin' in the gloabl section and this should the final piece. cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song --Switchfoot (2003) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAKktlIR7qMdg1EfYRAlDXAJ4pCNm6O+tdYdku9A3q/JN7n+dd7wCgomcQ g2xf7vr6jecbx5pBGM16XJU= =l336 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Transparently replacing a 2.2.7 PDC with 3.0
Hi, I sent this post yesterday morning for a first time, but apparently Gmane ate it as it never showed up. I am reposting. All my apologies if you receive this port in duplicate. I tried to replace a Samba 2.2.7 PDC to a 3.0 transparently, and it did not work. For my explanation, we will call the Samba 2.2.7 PDC samba2, the new Samba 3 server samba3 and the domain DOMAIN. First, I migrate (by hand) all the users from samba2 to samba3; I copied smbpasswd, then cut-n-pasted the users and workstations account in /etc/passwd with vipw. Tested it, it seem to work well. At this point, samba3 is PDC for a temporary domain I called TEST. Then I retrieved the SID of DOMAIN by doing net getlocalsid DOMAIN. Kept it for later. I shutted down samba2. I edited smb.conf on samba3 to set the same workgroup name, netbios name, various config and share definition. Restart Samba on samba3. Set the SID to the one previously retrieved with net setlocalsid SID previously retrieved. Restarted samba3 again. Win9x clients worked correctly, no problems (as expected). NT-based clients complained about not finding the domain. I guessed I screwed up the SID change, so I copied secrets.tdb from samba2 to samba3 and restart Samba on samba3. It still did not work. Finally, I joined the NT-based clients by hand (fortunately, there was not many) and it worked. Since I have many Samba 2.2.x - 3.0 PDC migration coming in near-term future, I was wondering what I did wrong and if there is a work around it. Is it possible to change a Samba PDC in a totally transparent fashion for the clients ? Are there any known issue doing it from Samba 2.2.x to 3.0 ? Thanks for your answer ! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.1 - 3.0.2 upgrade problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 amrito wrote: | Basic effect: | when attaching a network drive, the system asked for a password and | afterwards rejected the service with a message like | 'invalid user or password' Is the last change time on the password set to 0 by chance? Please provide more details. cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song --Switchfoot (2003) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAKkwEIR7qMdg1EfYRAjdBAKCDBXBa0aIF839EAaTB/mAQD05eZwCcDB2e Qs4MbSKAPM7CU6WjVlFnvY8= =1U0K -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] A bug in smb.conf argument parsing, or the documentation is inconsistent ?
Hi, This is a repost of a message I posted yesterday. Apparently, Gmane ate it. I apologize in advance if people receive it in duplicate. I am running Samba 3 on Fedora Core 1. I had problem with home dir and profiles using the following directive in smb.conf : logon home = \\%L\%U logon path = \\%L\%U logon drive = u: It worked when I removed the quote -- in the logon home and logon path directive such as : logon home = \\%L\%U logon path = \\%L\%U logon drive = u: The example in the smb.conf man page had quote. In Samba 2.2.7, the quote did not pose any problems. Is this a bug in Samba 3.0 in general, in the rpm from FC1 in particuliar or it's just that the behavior changed from 2.2.x to 3.0 and the doc had not been updated ? Thanks ! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Welcome to DM Direct
Thank you for subscribing to DM Direct! You have been subscribed to DM Direct with the following information MS Corporation Public Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.1 - 3.0.2 upgrade problem
same thing here... amrito wrote: Michal Sladek wrote: This morning I tried to upgrade Samba from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2 final I had only few minutes to test it from Windows XP clients (we use Windows 98 and XP clients in our company) because we have hundreds of users connected and I had to go back to 3.0.1 immediately before the get angry:-) Exactly the same happend with me. After compiling 3.0.2 (which worked absolutely fine) and installing it, the telephone started to ring, and I had to revert immediately. Basic effect: when attaching a network drive, the system asked for a password and afterwards rejected the service with a message like 'invalid user or password' I haven't got time to install 3.0.2 on a spare server to check what went wrong without the threat of being thrown out of the window, but if in between someone got some hints what might have gone wrong and (even more interesting) how to fix it, I would greatly appreciate to get the info, too. Thanks Regards john -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password length
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Reinke Bonte wrote: | decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password length fixed in 3.0.2 (or install sp3 or later on the 2k client). cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song --Switchfoot (2003) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAKk7/IR7qMdg1EfYRAnXEAJ4t3u/cijABcY0NT3EXFB9nYecLLACg5srG ucr+qAVezBLv7lL6ktzS8jM= =t401 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 3.0.1-member-server-printing
[global] ... printer admin = DOMAIN+Administrator ... doesn't help, sorry, it's already there. I will try to chmod to 775 the /var/lib/samba (owner root.root) directory and add DOMAIN+Administrator to group root, only for testing will report success or failure regards odi Am Mi, den 11.02.2004 schrieb Gerald (Jerry) Carter um 16:33: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Manfred Odenstein wrote: | I've tried to install the printer drivers for clients | (win9x/2000/xp) via the APW (add printer wizard), but | I've failed with access denied. If I changed the | filesystem permissions in the [print$]-path in the way | that the DOMAIN+Administrator is allowed to create | directories and files, the driver files were copied on to | the samba box. But the driver installation failed (maybe | for the default properties). put 'printer admin' in the gloabl section and this should the final piece. cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song --Switchfoot (2003) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAKktlIR7qMdg1EfYRAlDXAJ4pCNm6O+tdYdku9A3q/JN7n+dd7wCgomcQ g2xf7vr6jecbx5pBGM16XJU= =l336 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba / Networking trouble since latest windows update
For additional info the patch only seems to be affecting Mac OS X versions of Samba: Mac OS X 10.3.2 Server Details (Apple Samba 3.0.0rc2) Local user/group authentication Workgroup No WINS support Server - Patched XP Client = random network hanging and dropouts while browsing. Server - Unpatched XP Client = Ok Server - Patched 2K Client = Ok Server - Unpatched 2K Client = Ok Server - Non-Windows Client = Ok Solaris 9 Server Details (Samba 2.2.x) Local user/group authentication Workgroup No WINS support Server - Patched XP Client = Ok Server - Unpatched XP Client = Ok Server - Patched 2K Client = Ok Server - Unpatched 2K Client = Ok Linux Server Details (Samba 2.2.x 3) ldap authentication Server - Patched XP Client = Ok Server - Unpatched XP Client = Ok Server - Patched 2K Client = Ok Server - Unpatched 2K Client = Ok I've upped the log level to 10 and the output is exactly the same from working and non-working clients; the log doesn't hang half way through the operation either - it seems as if it completes everything ok, ie the output of the log stops at the same place it does when the operation completes successfully on a non-patched XP or 2K client. Network load is pretty average; I've even turned off all WINS resolution (the resolve list in smb.conf is simply lmhost and host now) to see if that was causing problems; nope. smbstatus shows everyone connected ok, files open etc. smbclient queries the server and brings back the shares fine. Do we have any idea as to what was in that Microsoft IE cumulative update (MS04-004, KB832894) that could have caused this problem on XP? It's bizarre; sometimes it will work fine and then only hang when changing back up a directory, others it will hang for minutes when you just first try to open a drive. The problem has got to be client side, I'm almost certain of it. -John -Original Message- From: John Snowdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 February 2004 16:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Samba / Networking trouble since latest windows update This is not really a Samba problem, but it does relate to Samba, in a fashion... In regards to: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/?url=/technet/securit y/bulleti n/MS04-004.asp Since the latest security patch from Microsoft (last Thursday?) was applied to common desktop machines within our school we have been suffering from problems with network connections. We run several Mac OS X Xserves (10.3.2; thus Samba would be Apples' own 3.0x release) as a workgroup within the medical school which are used as samba file servers for the windows machines. However, since the last security update, users have serious problems accessing the systems. Authentication is against local users and groups on the machine - we don't use ldap or active directory for the time being. We still use the university WINS resolution, and access to other uni shared drives 'seems' to be largely unaffected, however access to our own servers is largely a hit and miss affair - users connect and then will pause for a minute or more... access will then appear to be fine - directory browsing, opening files etc.. , but then all of a sudden the connection will hang again, taking down explorer and the desktop, thus requiring a manual re-launch of explorer. While the system is connected and not hung, all normal use is fine, but the hanging connection is, for all intents and purposes, completely random - there are no errors in any system or samba logs. This occurs on every users machine that is on common desktop and thus has had the update installed, and on non common desktop machines that users have manually installed the security update (these users started to see problems last Friday after applying the update). Those without the update installed are completely unaffected. Non-windows clients accessing our servers are unaffected (solaris, mac-os, mac-os x), as is non-smb traffic (http/ftp, mysql, rsync, ssh etc.). Servers have been running pretty much continuously without problem since they were installed months ago. Bandwidth and cpu use at our servers are all within normal levels and are not even close to 50% - we routinely rsync several gigabytes of data from these servers to our main Solaris box every day and this also seems to be unaffected. Has anyone heard any other reports of network problems with this update? I appreciate it's a bit of a difficult siutation to fully understand to people outside of Newcastle University, but it would really help if anyone had heard of anything related to this security update, or problems it has caused. I'm under the impression that this windows update has changed some settings in or the registry on all client machines... as to what it is... I'm at a loss. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] adding users from trusted domains into groups
Hello I have domain KEVF_D4 run by samba PDC that trusts domain KEVF_D1 run by NT4 PDC. The trust is running judging according to at least 3 independent signs it is really working. However when I fire up usrmgrx.exe on a computer that is in KEVF_D4 (and is different from the PDC because PDC is Linux and there are no Windows to run usrmgrx.exe on) and creat a local group and then try to add someone from KEVF_D1 into the local group, I get an error message User name cannot be found. I also tried to add some group from KEVF_D1 into that KEVF_D4 local group and it does the same: User name cannot be found. I wonder what user name is it talking about when I am adding one group into another and think no user names should be involved. Are these operations supported? If not, is it difficult to hack them up into the Samba? Cl -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Mail Transaction Failed
... -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Writing to a ReExported NFS Share With A MAC
I ran into this problem and was unable to find a solution here or in google. Thought I'd post it to the list so maybe it'll help someone out in the future. Gentoo Linux running 2.4.22 and Samba 2.2.8a. ReExporting an NFS mounted share on a NetAPP fileserver connected to eth1 via samba out eth0. All PCs are able to write fine but when writing to the share via a mac using OSX the MAC errored out with permission denied and the samba logs showed the following [2004/02/09 16:48:01, 0] locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(657) posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock request at offset 0, length 4294967295 returned [2004/02/09 16:48:01, 0] locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(658) an No locks available error. This can happen when using 64 bit lock offsets [2004/02/09 16:48:01, 0] locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(659) on 32 bit NFS mounted file systems. The solution I was able to come up with was to add posix locking = no to the share in question. If there is a better solution that I missed please let me know but otherwise this has been working without a hitch so far. Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem with integration samba in a domain with ActiveDirectory 2003
i need help about sending encrypted passwords in konqueror with samba. when i made this in command line it works very fine but if i want to do that in konqueror it send only plain passwords. I've got samba 3.0.0.15 and the computer is member of a domain with ActiveDirectory 2003. Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] impossible to write
I have a problem with writing files to a samba folder (kind of upload). I'm using Windows XP on a Dell laptop. Samba version 2.2.7-3.7.2 is installed on a linux redhat 7.2 server. I can read the files, copy them (kind of download) to my local hard disk on my laptop, but can't copy a file from my local hard disk to any samba folder, even a file as small as 30 KB !!! When I try to do this, I get the samba folder frozen for about 2 minutes, and then I get this message from windows : Impossible to copy file name : The access path is too long, which is my personal translation of what I really get in French : Impossible de copier file name : Le chemin d'accès est trop long. (file name is the name of the file I want to copy). Please help !!! Thanks Here is my /etc/smb.conf file : [global] # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name workgroup = WORKGROUP # server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field server string = Kronos Samba Server load printers = no log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m # Put a capping on the size of the log files (in Kb). max log size = 50 # Security mode. Most people will want user level security. See # security_level.txt for details. security = user # Use password server option only with security = server ; password server = NT-Server-Name # Password Level allows matching of _n_ characters of the password for # all combinations of upper and lower case. ; password level = 8 ; username level = 8 # You may wish to use password encryption. Please read # ENCRYPTION.txt, Win95.txt and WinNT.txt in the Samba documentation. # Do not enable this option unless you have read those documents encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 dns proxy = no [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S browseable = no ; this was writable (no e) before : writeable = yes create mode = 0664 directory mode = 0775 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] massive performance problems if transferring many small files
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:29:47AM +0100, Steffen Kauka wrote: You did suggest to try Samba 3 - I did it. My test environment consists of a PC (Pentium 4 2.4 GHz CPU and 512 MB RAM), a SUN Blade 100 (500 MHz CPU, 256 MB RAM) and between both a switched network at a speed of 100 MBit/s. The smb.conf is the same as I mentioned in my initially posting. Unfortunately I couldn't recognize any significant difference between Samba 2.2.8a and Samba 3.0.1 :-( Now the good news! If I change the option 'preserve case' to 'yes' the transfer rate increases by about 550% and that's really ok. I don't expect any problems in this case because the source data I want to transfer are lower case at all and UNIX-like. What do you mean with nasty implications? At the moment I can't imagine a case. Well this will work perfectly for your environment, where you have a read-only data set whose filenames you control the case of. It won't work in the general case where Windows apps create files though. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] A samba locking question
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 02:11:07PM +0100, Patrik Gustavsson wrote: Let me the try to communicate in a different way. The only thing I want to know if byte range locks or file share reservation are propagated to or from UNIX. That is: a) When a external program is doing a byte range lock through fcntl on file, will that be checked before Samba is opening the file ? My findings tells me it does. Yes it will. b) When a external program is doing file share reservation through on a file fcntl will that be checked before Samba is opening the file ? My findings tells me it don't. The test-program did file share reservation through fcntl on file with the parameters: f_access=F_RWACC (Set a file share reservation for read and write access) f_deny=F_RWDNY (Set a file share reservation to deny read and write) The client could through Samba open and write in that file. I have never heard of these f_access codes ? This is not POSIX. I have no clue what system you are using that has these share modes. No POSIX system has this. So not suprisingly Samba doesn't know anything about this. c) If/When Samba is doing a byte range lock on file will that byte range lock be propagated externaly to UNIX ? I believe it will not. Yes it will, you are incorrect. d) If/When Samba is doing a file share reservation on file will that be propagated externaly to UNIX ? My findings tells me it don't. Only on Linux, where Samba is compiled with the parameter HAVE_KERNEL_SHARE_MODES will share modes be understood by the kernel. Share modes have *NOTHING* to do with byte range locks. The two are completely orthoganal. You really need to understand this before you can proceed. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba 3.0.2 in production on file sever?
Hello! Do someone use Samba 3.0.2 in production on file server? When I tired to migrate our fileserver to 3.0 from 2.2.8a with only 200 (or 300, hmm, I don't remember ;-) ) users, with about a 40-50 users, which use old dos clipper based application, I had locking problems (someone can say that this was not locking problem, but I think so). Now I want to try migration to 3.0.2. But, may be somebody already did such thing. Oh, I forgot- OS is Linux, SLES8. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Monitoring File Use
Hello, I'm very new to Linux and have a basic question. I am using Debian. Is there a module I can load (either from dselect or from an outside source) the will allow me to monitor file use on the network? Can this be done within Webmin? Hope this is the right place for this question. Thanks. Bruce -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Unable to join ADS domain
I've installed Samba 3.0.2 (from the source) on a SuSE
8.2 system with MIT Kerberos 1.3.1 (I uninstalled the
Heimdal code) and the OpenLDAP 2.1.27 development
libraries installed on it. I want to make this system
a domain member of a Win2K native-mode ADS domain but
can't get net ads join to work. I've run kinit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I get at ticket, but when I do
net ads join -Umyid%mypswd I get no output from the
command and I don't get a machine account in the
domain.
My /etc/krb5.conf looks like:
logging]
default = FILE:/var/log/krb5libs.log
kdc = FILE:/var/log/krb5kdc.log
admin_server = FILE:/var/log/kadmind.log
[libdefaults]
default_realm =MYDOMAIN.COM
clockskew = 300
default_tkt_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5
default_tgs_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5
[realms]
MYDOMAIN.COM = {
kdc = DCSRV1.MYDOMAIN.COM:88
admin_server = dcsrv1.mydomain.com:749
default_domain = mydomain.com
}
[domain_realm]
.mydomain.com = MYDOMAIN.COM
mydomain.com = MYDOMAIN.COM
My /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf looks like:
[global]
realm = MYDOMAIN.COM
security = ads
password server = 10.4.1.13
workgroup = MYDOMAIN
netbios name = susesrv
server string = SAMBA SERVER
encrypt passwords = yes
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
printing = cups
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 1
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192
SO_SNDBUF=8192
local master = no
domain master = no
preferred master = no
wins server = 10.4.1.60
dns proxy = no
#===SHARE
DEFINITIONS===
[public]
path = /usr/public
browseable = yes
writeable = yes
guest ok = no
[printers]
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = yes
writeable = no
guest ok = yes
printable = yes
.COM
security = ads
password server = 10.4.1.13
workgroup = COLUMBIA
netbios name = susesrv
server string = IBM Aptiva in Joe's cube
encrypt passwords = yes
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
printing = cups
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 1
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192
SO_SNDBUF=8192
local master = no
domain master = no
preferred master = no
wins server = 10.4.1.60
dns proxy = no
#===SHARE
DEFINITIONS===
[public]
path = /usr/public
browseable = yes
writeable = yes
guest ok = no
[printers]
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = yes
writeable = no
guest ok = yes
printable = yes
=
Joe Howell
Shelter Insurance Companies
Columbia, MO
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] WinXP sometimes is slow opening files / browsing directories
Hi, I was reading your article. One question, do you have Norton antivirus installed in your system? if so, there's a problem with both of them. We are experiencing the same problem. Just have to wait for the next service pack from Might Microsoft. Have a nice day. Louis Ong Summa Engineering Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (905) 678-3388 Ext. 241 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] NetBIOS via ssh tunnel: still getting nowhere
I have good results with openvpn which exists as client for windows too Regards - Original Message - From: Paul Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 1:26 PM Subject: [Samba] NetBIOS via ssh tunnel: still getting nowhere Hi, I'm still trying to open a Samba share from Windows XP, via an ssh tunnel. From Linux, and RiscOS no problem, but Windows no. Surely someone here has needed to do this at some time or other. Please help. Cheers, Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 3.0.1-member-server-printing
ok, failure :-( I've changed permission on all *.tdb in /var/lib/samba, driver files transfered correctly, samba noticed Added printer driver. Printer name is blabla . NT4-Server reported (translated from german) : could not changed to given driver, previous settings will be restored. after closing the dialog, an additional dialog pops up saying: Printer properties couldn't be stored, Access denied. (also translated from german) I've raised the log level and noticed a lot of NT_STATUS messages like: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND NT_STATUS_NOT_A_DIRECTORY NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_FILE NT_STATUS_INVALID_LEVEL any suggestions ? is this a solution ? 1.) create account named root on PDC (NT4), added to group Domain Admins 2.) changed uid in winbind_idmap.tdb to 0 (is there a way to do this ? with the tdb utitlities ?) 3.) log on with this account and try ones more regards odi Am Mi, den 11.02.2004 schrieb Manfred Odenstein um 16:48: [global] ... printer admin = DOMAIN+Administrator ... doesn't help, sorry, it's already there. I will try to chmod to 775 the /var/lib/samba (owner root.root) directory and add DOMAIN+Administrator to group root, only for testing will report success or failure regards odi Am Mi, den 11.02.2004 schrieb Gerald (Jerry) Carter um 16:33: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Manfred Odenstein wrote: | I've tried to install the printer drivers for clients | (win9x/2000/xp) via the APW (add printer wizard), but | I've failed with access denied. If I changed the | filesystem permissions in the [print$]-path in the way | that the DOMAIN+Administrator is allowed to create | directories and files, the driver files were copied on to | the samba box. But the driver installation failed (maybe | for the default properties). put 'printer admin' in the gloabl section and this should the final piece. cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song --Switchfoot (2003) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAKktlIR7qMdg1EfYRAlDXAJ4pCNm6O+tdYdku9A3q/JN7n+dd7wCgomcQ g2xf7vr6jecbx5pBGM16XJU= =l336 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Linux and AD
I am trying to replace all our NT 4.0 BDC's in our remote offices to Linux with Samba 3.0. How would I get a workstation at the remote office to run login scripts from the samba server w/o having a BDC at the remote office anymore and the workstation's migrated to AD from NT? Is there somekind of variable that needs to exist on each workstation? Gilbert Delagarza Network Computing Services 901-580-2351 901-351-8413 (Cell) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Unable to join ADS domain
No bueno. I changed the enctypes and took the encrypt passwords=yes out, but still
no reply and no computer account.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[libdefaults]
default_realm =MYDOMAIN.COM
clockskew = 300
default_tkt_enctypes = des-cbc-crc
default_tgs_enctypes = des-cbc-crc
Change the enctypes to: des-cbc-crc as shown above. Also, if you do a
testparam I'll bet that the encrypt passwords = yes entry is going to give
you grief. Besides kerberos is encrypted anyway. Another thing to consider
is flushing the NetBIOS cache on your wins and kdc server - don't know if
this does anything, but it makes me feel better (nbtstat -R).
Tracy Steven Brown
University of Arizona
Dept. Neurology
(520) 626-4660
Joe Howell
o.com To
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
samba-bounces+tsb cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sts.samba.org Subject
[Samba] Unable to join ADS domain
02/11/2004 12:05
PM
I've installed Samba 3.0.2 (from the source) on a SuSE
8.2 system with MIT Kerberos 1.3.1 (I uninstalled the
Heimdal code) and the OpenLDAP 2.1.27 development
libraries installed on it. I want to make this system
a domain member of a Win2K native-mode ADS domain but
can't get net ads join to work. I've run kinit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I get at ticket, but when I do
net ads join -Umyid%mypswd I get no output from the
command and I don't get a machine account in the
domain.
My /etc/krb5.conf looks like:
logging]
default = FILE:/var/log/krb5libs.log
kdc = FILE:/var/log/krb5kdc.log
admin_server = FILE:/var/log/kadmind.log
[libdefaults]
default_realm =MYDOMAIN.COM
clockskew = 300
default_tkt_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5
default_tgs_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5
[realms]
MYDOMAIN.COM = {
kdc = DCSRV1.MYDOMAIN.COM:88
admin_server = dcsrv1.mydomain.com:749
default_domain = mydomain.com
}
[domain_realm]
.mydomain.com = MYDOMAIN.COM
mydomain.com = MYDOMAIN.COM
My /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf looks like:
[global]
realm = MYDOMAIN.COM
security = ads
password server = 10.4.1.13
workgroup = MYDOMAIN
netbios name = susesrv
server string = SAMBA SERVER
encrypt passwords = yes
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
printing = cups
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 1
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192
SO_SNDBUF=8192
local master = no
domain master = no
preferred master = no
wins server = 10.4.1.60
dns proxy = no
#===SHARE
DEFINITIONS===
[public]
path = /usr/public
browseable = yes
writeable = yes
guest ok = no
[printers]
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = yes
writeable = no
guest ok = yes
printable = yes
.COM
security = ads
password server = 10.4.1.13
workgroup = COLUMBIA
netbios name = susesrv
server string = IBM Aptiva in Joe's cube
encrypt passwords = yes
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
printing = cups
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 1
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192
SO_SNDBUF=8192
local master = no
domain master = no
preferred master = no
wins server = 10.4.1.60
dns proxy = no
#===SHARE
DEFINITIONS===
[public]
path = /usr/public
browseable = yes
writeable = yes
guest ok = no
[printers]
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = yes
writeable = no
guest ok = yes
printable = yes
=
Joe Howell
Shelter Insurance Companies
Columbia, MO
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Joe Howell
Shelter Insurance Companies
Columbia, MO
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Unable to join ADS domain
Great site with wonderful information. Unfortunately, it still don't work.
John Simovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:have a look at
www.wlug.org.nz/ActiveDirectorySamba
- Original Message -
From: Joe Howell
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Unable to join ADS domain
No bueno. I changed the enctypes and took the encrypt passwords=yes
out, but still no reply and no computer account.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[libdefaults]
default_realm =MYDOMAIN.COM
clockskew = 300
default_tkt_enctypes = des-cbc-crc
default_tgs_enctypes = des-cbc-crc
Change the enctypes to: des-cbc-crc as shown above. Also, if you do a
testparam I'll bet that the encrypt passwords = yes entry is going to give
you grief. Besides kerberos is encrypted anyway. Another thing to consider
is flushing the NetBIOS cache on your wins and kdc server - don't know if
this does anything, but it makes me feel better (nbtstat -R).
Tracy Steven Brown
University of Arizona
Dept. Neurology
(520) 626-4660
Joe Howell
o.com To
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
samba-bounces+tsb cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sts.samba.org Subject
[Samba] Unable to join ADS domain
02/11/2004 12:05
PM
I've installed Samba 3.0.2 (from the source) on a SuSE
8.2 system with MIT Kerberos 1.3.1 (I uninstalled the
Heimdal code) and the OpenLDAP 2.1.27 development
libraries installed on it. I want to make this system
a domain member of a Win2K native-mode ADS domain but
can't get net ads join to work. I've run kinit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I get at ticket, but when I do
net ads join -Umyid%mypswd I get no output from the
command and I don't get a machine account in the
domain.
My /etc/krb5.conf looks like:
logging]
default = FILE:/var/log/krb5libs.log
kdc = FILE:/var/log/krb5kdc.log
admin_server = FILE:/var/log/kadmind.log
[libdefaults]
default_realm =MYDOMAIN.COM
clockskew = 300
default_tkt_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5
default_tgs_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5
[realms]
MYDOMAIN.COM = {
kdc = DCSRV1.MYDOMAIN.COM:88
admin_server = dcsrv1.mydomain.com:749
default_domain = mydomain.com
}
[domain_realm]
.mydomain.com = MYDOMAIN.COM
mydomain.com = MYDOMAIN.COM
My /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf looks like:
[global]
realm = MYDOMAIN.COM
security = ads
password server = 10.4.1.13
workgroup = MYDOMAIN
netbios name = susesrv
server string = SAMBA SERVER
encrypt passwords = yes
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
printing = cups
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 1
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192
SO_SNDBUF=8192
local master = no
domain master = no
preferred master = no
wins server = 10.4.1.60
dns proxy = no
#===SHARE
DEFINITIONS===
[public]
path = /usr/public
browseable = yes
writeable = yes
guest ok = no
[printers]
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = yes
writeable = no
guest ok = yes
printable = yes
.COM
security = ads
password server = 10.4.1.13
workgroup = COLUMBIA
netbios name = susesrv
server string = IBM Aptiva in Joe's cube
encrypt passwords = yes
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
printing = cups
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 1
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192
SO_SNDBUF=8192
local master = no
domain master = no
preferred master = no
wins server = 10.4.1.60
dns proxy = no
#===SHARE
DEFINITIONS===
[public]
path = /usr/public
browseable = yes
writeable = yes
guest ok = no
[printers]
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = yes
writeable = no
guest ok = yes
printable = yes
=
Joe Howell
Shelter Insurance Companies
Columbia, MO
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Joe Howell
Shelter Insurance Companies
Columbia, MO
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Joe Howell
Shelter Insurance Companies
Columbia, MO
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] NTLMv2 in Samba 3.0
I tested NTLMv2 again using the newly created Samba 3.0.2 (I didn't test 3.0.1). It still doesn't seem to work. Has anyone successfully made NTLMv2 work? If so, can I have a working sample of the smb.conf file? I have included below entries in my smb.conf (among other entries): security = server password server = NTDomainController client ntlmv2 auth = yes On both NTDomainController and W2k client, I have Imcompatibilitylevel set to 3 or 5 from the Registry Editor for LSA. On NTDomainController, it also has both NtlmMinClientSec and NtlmMinServerSec set to 0x0008 (to permit only NTLMv2 session security). I just cannot map a drive from W2k client to the Samba server running Solaris 8. Thanks a lot in advance. Dan -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 11:29 PM To: Chu, Dan [IT] Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [Samba] NTLMv2 in Samba 3.0 On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 06:53, Chu, Dan [IT] wrote: Hello, Has anyone successfully configured Samba 3.0 to authenticate using NTLMv2 only? I have below entry in smb.conf: password server = domain controller to use domain controller for user authentication and DC is configured with Level 5 - DC refuses LM and NTLM authentication (accepts only NTLMv2). So far I got: System error 1326 has occurred. Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password. errors. I am not sure what option(s) to use in the smb.conf file to make it work. My understanding is that Samba 3.0 defaults to NTLMv2 if password server is configured to accept NTLMv2. As a server, Samba 3.0 implements NTLMv2 by default. Samba also passes on NTLMv2 authentication attempts to the DC without modification, so it can validate them. As a client, you need to specify 'client ntlmv2 auth = yes' to force Samba to use NTLMv2, as it is incompatible with older servers. It is not possible to 'modify' an NTLM authentication request into NTLMv2, so if your clients are not configured correctly, they will not correctly talk to an NTLMv2 enforcing server/domain. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba win 2000 permissions
I'm using SuSE 9 and Samba 2.28. Samba is config'd as a stand alone server in a workgoup. I want users to be able to create shares and add the users they want with the permissions they want. I've been testing this by, logging in as a user(Win2K), creating a folder, right clicking on the folder, go to Properties, Security Tab, click Add - find another user, click ok, ok. It then gives me this error: Unable to save permission changes on folder that I created Access denied. Does anyone know how to fix this? Do I have to config samba as a PDC in order to get this function? Thanks -Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] NTLMv2 in Samba 3.0
Andrew, Thank you for your reply. I'm not sure what is not required. Do you mean client ntlmv2 auth = yes ? Anyway, I've changed it to security = domain in smb.conf (all other entries remain intact). I was able to join the samba server to the NT domain using the net join utility. Then restarted the samba daemons. When trying to map a drive from an W2k client, I got below error: Configuration information could not be read from the domain controller, either because the machine is unavailable, or access has been denied. What did I miss here? Thanks, Dan -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 4:35 PM To: Chu, Dan Cc: Andrew Bartlett; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Samba] NTLMv2 in Samba 3.0 On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 08:27, Chu, Dan wrote: I tested NTLMv2 again using the newly created Samba 3.0.2 (I didn't test 3.0.1). It still doesn't seem to work. Has anyone successfully made NTLMv2 work? If so, can I have a working sample of the smb.conf file? I have included below entries in my smb.conf (among other entries): security = server password server = NTDomainController client ntlmv2 auth = yes This is not required for pass-though NTLMv2 authentication. On both NTDomainController and W2k client, I have Imcompatibilitylevel set to 3 or 5 from the Registry Editor for LSA. On NTDomainController, it also has both NtlmMinClientSec and NtlmMinServerSec set to 0x0008 (to permit only NTLMv2 session security). I just cannot map a drive from W2k client to the Samba server running Solaris 8. Use 'security=domain'. NTLM2 session security is not compatible with 'security=server'. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] SAMBA 3.02 - problems in compilation Unixware 7.1.1
We need update our samba version in Unixware server (uw 7.1.1) to 3.02 version, we have make: ./configure - that seems without any problem but when we tried ./make we had gotten this message: ../samba/samba-3.0.2/source LIBS = -lgen -lresolv -lsocket -lnsl LDSHFLAGS = -G LDFLAGS = Compiling dynconfig.c UX:acomp: WARNING: include/vfs.h, line 462: no macro replacement within a string literal Compiling smbd/build_options.c UX:acomp: WARNING: smbd/build_options.c, line 1: empty translation unit Linking bin/smbd Undefined first referenced symbol in file __unsafe_string_function_usage_here__ msdfs/msdfs.o build_options smbd/server.o UX:ld: ERROR: bin/smbd: fatal error: Symbol referencing errors. No output writte n to bin/smbd make: *** [bin/smbd] Error 1 what we are doing wrong?? Thanks Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] NetBIOS via ssh tunnel: still getting nowhere
From: rruegner [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have good results with openvpn which exists as client for windows too Regards Thanks for info. I probably can't use that. I'm not in control of the server. The server has sshd running on it already, but I wouldn't be able to arrange for a vpn server to be installed. What's annoying is that port 139 forwarding is sufficient to make the connection (as shown by other OS's), but Windows refuses to try without first doing some sort of name resolution. Cheers, Paul. - Original Message - From: Paul Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 1:26 PM Subject: [Samba] NetBIOS via ssh tunnel: still getting nowhere Hi, I'm still trying to open a Samba share from Windows XP, via an ssh tunnel. From Linux, and RiscOS no problem, but Windows no. Surely someone here has needed to do this at some time or other. Please help. Cheers, Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] ACL LDAP
Hi, I've been using Samba on XFS with ACL support for a while. But mapping the NT ACL to POSIX ACL is very hairy to maintain and often results are not what I expected. Would LDAP provide better solution for folder restrictions? Could someone recommend other alternatives? Regards, Norman -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] NetBIOS via ssh tunnel: still getting nowhere
Maybe you can use putty , a time ago i tunnel a few other ports through putty but non smb , perhaps you should try Regards - Original Message - From: Paul Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 12:57 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] NetBIOS via ssh tunnel: still getting nowhere From: rruegner [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have good results with openvpn which exists as client for windows too Regards Thanks for info. I probably can't use that. I'm not in control of the server. The server has sshd running on it already, but I wouldn't be able to arrange for a vpn server to be installed. What's annoying is that port 139 forwarding is sufficient to make the connection (as shown by other OS's), but Windows refuses to try without first doing some sort of name resolution. Cheers, Paul. - Original Message - From: Paul Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 1:26 PM Subject: [Samba] NetBIOS via ssh tunnel: still getting nowhere Hi, I'm still trying to open a Samba share from Windows XP, via an ssh tunnel. From Linux, and RiscOS no problem, but Windows no. Surely someone here has needed to do this at some time or other. Please help. Cheers, Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] still trying to get groupmap details worked through
Red Hat AS 3 - samba 3.0.0 I am confused by the errors in these logs - can anyone clarify, what if anything I am doing wrong? PDC (LDAP Master - aka linserv2) /var/log/samba/dell-4348 [2004/02/10 08:17:29, 0] groupdb/mapping.c:init_group_mapping(139) Failed to open group mapping database [2004/02/10 08:17:29, 0] groupdb/mapping.c:get_domain_group_from_sid(509) BDC (LDAP Slave - aka linserv1) /var/log/samba/dell-4348 [2004/02/11 16:34:31, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1612) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (Insufficient access)smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root.. Brief as possible - conf. data follows... /etc/samba/smb.conf (PDC - LDAP master) passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost/ ldap suffix = o=Domain,c=US ldap passwd sync = Yes ldap admin dn = cn=root,o=Domain,c=US /etc/samba/smb.conf (BDC - LDAP slave) passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost/ ldaps://linserv2.domain.com/ ldap suffix = o=Domain,c=US ldap passwd sync = Yes ldap admin dn = cn=admin,o=Domain,c=US net groupmap list (output on both PDC BDC is the same) Super Admin (S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-1512) - root Users All (S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-1500) - users-all Users PR (S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-1502) - users-pr Users ADV (S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-1503) - users-adv Users Acctg (S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-1504) - users-acctg Users Web (S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-1505) - users-web Users Remote (S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-1506) - users-remote MTS Impersonators (S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-1003) - MTS Impersonators WWW access (S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-1015) - WWW access Account Operators (S-1-5-32-548) - Account Operators Guests (S-1-5-32-546) - Guests Server Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - Server Operators Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-512) - Domain Admins Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-513) - Domain Users Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-514) - Domain Guests Accounting (S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-1008) - Accounting Public Relations (S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-1021) - Public Relations Macintosh Users (S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-1049) - Macintosh Users Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) - Administrators Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) - Print Operators Domain Computers (S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-553) - Domain Computers Replicator (S-1-5-32-552) - Replicator Backup Operators (S-1-5-32-551) - Backup Operators Users 'primary posix group' is users-all Users 'primary samba group' is Domain Users The user logged in at dell-4348 (typical of users) looks like this from LDAP query: # khageman, People, Domain, US dn: uid=khageman,ou=People,o=Domain,c=US gecos: System User description: System User displayName: Kelly Hageman sambaPwdLastSet: 1074451596 sambaPwdCanChange: 1074451596 sambaPwdMustChange: 2147483647 sambaProfilePath: \\linserv1\profiles\khageman sambaLogonScript: users-pr.bat cn: Kelly Hageman uidNumber: 1024 sambaPrimaryGroupSID: S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-513 sambaAcctFlags: [U ] mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sambaLMPassword: ---REMOVED uid: khageman sambaHomePath: \\linserv2\homes\khageman homeDirectory: /home/users/khageman objectClass: top objectClass: inetOrgPerson objectClass: posixAccount objectClass: sambaSamAccount sambaDomainName: DOMAIN gidNumber: 1000 sambaSID: S-1-5-21-1292501092-333717336-619646970-1092 sambaNTPassword: ---REMOVED sn: Hageman givenName: Kelley loginShell: /bin/false userPassword:: ---REMOVED -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba 3.0.1 - 3.0.2 upgrade problem
org] On Behalf Of Barry Smoke Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2004 02:47 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.1 - 3.0.2 upgrade problem same thing here... I had a similar experience, where NT4, 9X DOS clients dropped off. This was caused by a hung process or locked file in my case, where smbd failed shutdown cleanly. Rather than attempting to trace the rogue file/process, I simply restarted the machine and all came up roses. amrito wrote: Michal Sladek wrote: This morning I tried to upgrade Samba from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2 final I had only few minutes to test it from Windows XP clients (we use Windows 98 and XP clients in our company) because we have hundreds of users connected and I had to go back to 3.0.1 immediately before the get angry:-) Exactly the same happend with me. After compiling 3.0.2 (which worked absolutely fine) and installing it, the telephone started to ring, and I had to revert immediately. Basic effect: when attaching a network drive, the system asked for a password and afterwards rejected the service with a message like 'invalid user or password' I haven't got time to install 3.0.2 on a spare server to check what went wrong without the threat of being thrown out of the window, but if in between someone got some hints what might have gone wrong and (even more interesting) how to fix it, I would greatly appreciate to get the info, too. Thanks Regards john Might be better to set-up a test machine test your upgrades before rolling them out eh! Cheers, Lewis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] New Fedora RPMS available
Heads up, These should fix the cups problems reported on the list yesterday. See http://samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/ Where the deb's also effected? All printers are shared here, but access is uniformly denied? Cheers, Lewis Shobbrook -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] New Fedora RPMS available
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Lewis Shobbrook wrote: Heads up, These should fix the cups problems reported on the list yesterday. See http://samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/ Where the deb's also effected? All printers are shared here, but access is uniformly denied? I don't handle the debian packaging. Simo ? cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song --Switchfoot (2003) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQFAKw52IR7qMdg1EfYRAidiAJ4065yXKP4A9nAVFbxAHrVTFl+tewCfewvh 0tL4V4ZnlweAGHuIAzi8dWI= =eDHN -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbclient question regarding anonymous logins
In my opinion, it has nothing in common with network browsing. Similar error you get when you try to connect Windows XP Pro share as guest and this guest access is not allowed in Local Policy Settings. Michal On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, James Bowes wrote: Hi all. As relates to my previous email today (Samba 3.0.1 windows browsing), I broke out the troubleshooting document called Samba_troubleshooting. I followed through alot of the same steps I had previously though this time I use the following command: smbclient -L pgbc -N I received this message: Anonymous login successful tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE Of course when I login in with a password, the shares are listed as I expect. Does this anonymous login failure indicate why network browsing is not possible?? Thanks for any and all responses. --james -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] More Info: Mac permission problems after Debian update
There seems to be a few people having this problem, but not much response. I've dug into the logs, and while I don't know exactly what I am looking at, I think I may have found something that may make sense to someone. A short recap. Samba was working fine, until I did a Debian security update, which upgraded my Samba to 2.2.8a. Now, I can create files on a mounted Samba share in a console, but not in the finder, I get the message 'The operation cannot be completed because you do not have sufficient privileges for dilbert030923.gif', which is the name of the file being copied. From what I see in the logs, I think the privileges message is off. Once I dismiss the dialog, there is nothing in the directory I am copying to, but before I dismiss, I find two files: a zero length dilbert030923.gif, and a 82 byte ._dilbert030923.gif. One of the files being non-zero length is a second clue that the privileges message may be bogus. Because of the error messages below, I tried turning off posix locking, and things seem to be working now. So I guess my question has become, will running without posix locking harm anything? And, I don't believe I changed that setting during the upgrade. I suppose the default could have changed, but is there something more sinister going on in the logs below? I mounted the share, changed logging to level 10, and tried to copy a file. Looking in the log, I can see it create the 82 byte file, and open/read/close it a few times. There are a few of these: [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch message SMBlockingX (pid 391) [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 4] smbd/uid.c:change_to_user(119) change_to_user: Skipping user change - already user [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 10] smbd/reply.c:reply_lockingX(4707) reply_lockingX: unlock start=0, len=4294967295 for pid 1, file mp3/bar/._dilbert030923.gif [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 10] locking/locking.c:do_unlock(197) do_unlock: unlock start=0 len=4294967295 requested for file mp3/bar/._dilbert030923.gif [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 10] locking/brlock.c:brl_unlock(432) brl_unlock: tdb_fetch failed ! [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 10] locking/locking.c:do_unlock(209) do_unlock: returning ERRlock. [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(129) error packet at smbd/reply.c(4712) cmd=36 (SMBlockingX) eclass=1 ecode=158 But things seem to head south around here: [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch message SMBlockingX (pid 391) [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 4] smbd/uid.c:change_to_user(119) change_to_user: Skipping user change - already user [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 10] smbd/reply.c:reply_lockingX(4741) reply_lockingX: lock start=0, len=4294967295 for pid 1, file mp3/bar/dilbert030923.gif timeout = 0 [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 10] locking/locking.c:do_lock(113) do_lock: lock type WRITE start=0 len=4294967295 requested for file mp3/bar/dilbert030923.gif [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 5] locking/posix.c:set_posix_lock(969) set_posix_lock: File mp3/bar/dilbert030923.gif, offset = 0, count = 4294967295, type = WRITE [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 10] locking/posix.c:posix_lock_in_range(632) posix_lock_in_range: offset_out = 0, count_out = 4294967295 [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 10] locking/posix.c:add_posix_lock_entry(392) add_posix_lock: File mp3/bar/dilbert030923.gif: type = WRITE: start=0 size=4294967295: dev=833 inode=19598 [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 5] locking/posix.c:set_posix_lock(1055) set_posix_lock: Real lock: Type = WRITE: offset = 0, count = 4294967295 [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 8] locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(650) posix_fcntl_lock 22 13 0 4294967295 1 [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1308) fcntl_lock 22 13 0 4294967295 1 [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 3] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1319) fcntl_lock: fcntl lock gave errno 75 (Value too large for defined data type) [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 3] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1341) fcntl_lock: lock failed at offset 0 count 4294967295 op 13 type 1 (Value too large for defined data type) [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 8] locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(680) posix_fcntl_lock: Lock call failed [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 5] locking/posix.c:set_posix_lock(1059) set_posix_lock: Lock fail !: Type = WRITE: offset = 0, count = 4294967295. Errno = Value too large for defined data type [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 10] locking/locking.c:do_lock(113) do_lock: lock type WRITE start=0 len=4294967295 requested for file mp3/bar/dilbert030923.gif [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 5] locking/posix.c:set_posix_lock(969) set_posix_lock: File mp3/bar/dilbert030923.gif, offset = 0, count = 4294967295, type = WRITE [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 10] locking/posix.c:posix_lock_in_range(632) posix_lock_in_range: offset_out = 0, count_out = 4294967295 [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 10] locking/posix.c:add_posix_lock_entry(392) add_posix_lock: File mp3/bar/dilbert030923.gif: type = WRITE: start=0 size=4294967295: dev=833 inode=19598 [2004/02/12 00:07:40, 5] locking/posix.c:set_posix_lock(1055) set_posix_lock: Real lock: Type = WRITE:
[Samba] Re: scuruwv
TA WIADOMOSC ZOSTALA WYGENEROWANA AUTOMATYCZNIE jesli ja otrzymales, to znaczy, ze wyslales e-mail na konto [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Uprzejmie informuje, ze jest ono juz nieaktywne, moj obecny adres to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pozdrawiam serdecznie i przepraszam za utrudnienia Kaska -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] New Fedora RPMS available
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Heads up, These should fix the cups problems reported on the list yesterday. See http://samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/ cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song --Switchfoot (2003) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAKj2jIR7qMdg1EfYRAun3AKCT8wYXknBW0PdE/6jmjI7x50zSGQCgimTm 5zfixlKh1itRuTMUHfalxLU= =SIl1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3.0.1 windows browsing
Hi again all. I still haven't resolved this issue of browsing the LAN. Here are a few details: * The windows stations can see each other when the Samba server is off-line * The windows station can't see each or anything else on the network when Samba is brought on-line * Wins support is enabled * each windows station has proper Wins entries with Wins enabled * the server and stations have been rebooted several times - doesn't change anything * /etc/hosts has proper entries * each windows station has a static IP (small network, easy to manage) * nmblookup correctly identifies the Master Browser as the Samba server * smbclient properly lists shares on the Samba server and each windows station Here is a look at the nmblookup - general query applied nmblookup -L pgbc added interface ip=192.168.0.9 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Socket opened. querying pgbc on 192.168.0.255 Got a positive name query response from 192.168.0.9 ( 192.168.0.9 ) Got a positive name query response from 192.168.0.101 ( 192.168.0.101 ) Got a positive name query response from 192.168.0.105 ( 192.168.0.105 ) Got a positive name query response from 192.168.0.103 ( 192.168.0.103 ) Got a positive name query response from 192.168.0.104 ( 192.168.0.104 ) Got a positive name query response from 192.168.0.102 ( 192.168.0.102 ) 192.168.0.9 pgbc00 192.168.0.101 pgbc00 192.168.0.105 pgbc00 192.168.0.103 pgbc00 192.168.0.104 pgbc00 192.168.0.102 pgbc00 nmblookup - master browser query applied: nmblookup -M -- - added interface ip=192.168.0.9 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Socket opened. querying __MSBROWSE__ on 192.168.0.255 Got a positive name query response from 192.168.0.9 ( 192.168.0.9 ) 192.168.0.9 __MSBROWSE__01 smbclient query: Sharename Type Comment - --- user1_pub Disk User1's public docs user2_pub Disk User2's public docs user3_pub Disk User3's public docs pgbc Disk PGBC's public docs user4_pub Disk User4's public docs user5_pub Disk User5's public docs clerk_pub Disk IPC$IPC IPC Service (Samba Server) ADMIN$ IPC IPC Service (Samba Server) rootDisk Home Directories Server Comment ---- WorkgroupMaster ---- PGBCPGBC-SRV Any ideas or insight's would be helpful and very appreciated. Regards, --james -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbclient question regarding anonymous logins
Hi all. As relates to my previous email today (Samba 3.0.1 windows browsing), I broke out the troubleshooting document called Samba_troubleshooting. I followed through alot of the same steps I had previously though this time I use the following command: smbclient -L pgbc -N I received this message: Anonymous login successful tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE Of course when I login in with a password, the shares are listed as I expect. Does this anonymous login failure indicate why network browsing is not possible?? Thanks for any and all responses. --james -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Unable to join ADS domain
okay, try this:
Linux:
$ kdestroy
$ kinit Administrator
Windows:
(1) C:/where/ever/klist purge -- [default place is c:/program
files/resource kit/klist.exe]
(You'll need to download this from microsoft:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/reskit/tools/existing/klist-o.asp)
(2) Clear the NetBIOS cache again (I'm superstitious): nbtstat -R
--
Linux:
$ vi /etc/hosts - add: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx host.domain.name netbios_name
[of your ADS/KDC server]
$ net join ads
- if you get Administrator password you're good to go.
- if you get root password you're encryption settings are wrong (or at
least that was my problem).
Let's see what we get.
Tracy Steven Brown
University of Arizona
Dept. Neurology
(520) 626-4660
Joe Howell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
o.com To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/11/2004 01:04 cc
PM
Subject
Re: [Samba] Unable to join ADS
domain
No bueno. I changed the enctypes and took the encrypt passwords=yes out,
but still no reply and no computer account.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[libdefaults]
default_realm =MYDOMAIN.COM
clockskew = 300
default_tkt_enctypes = des-cbc-crc
default_tgs_enctypes = des-cbc-crc
Change the enctypes to: des-cbc-crc as shown above. Also, if you do a
testparam I'll bet that the encrypt passwords = yes entry is going to give
you grief. Besides kerberos is encrypted anyway. Another thing to consider
is flushing the NetBIOS cache on your wins and kdc server - don't know if
this does anything, but it makes me feel better (nbtstat -R).
Tracy Steven Brown
University of Arizona
Dept. Neurology
(520) 626-4660
Joe Howell
o.com To
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
samba-bounces+tsb cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sts.samba.org Subject
[Samba] Unable to join ADS domain
02/11/2004 12:05
PM
I've installed Samba 3.0.2 (from the source) on a SuSE
8.2 system with MIT Kerberos 1.3.1 (I uninstalled the
Heimdal code) and the OpenLDAP 2.1.27 development
libraries installed on it. I want to make this system
a domain member of a Win2K native-mode ADS domain but
can't get net ads join to work. I've run kinit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I get at ticket, but when I do
net ads join -Umyid%mypswd I get no output from the
command and I don't get a machine account in the
domain.
My /etc/krb5.conf looks like:
logging]
default = FILE:/var/log/krb5libs.log
kdc = FILE:/var/log/krb5kdc.log
admin_server = FILE:/var/log/kadmind.log
[libdefaults]
default_realm =MYDOMAIN.COM
clockskew = 300
default_tkt_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5
default_tgs_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5
[realms]
MYDOMAIN.COM = {
kdc = DCSRV1.MYDOMAIN.COM:88
admin_server = dcsrv1.mydomain.com:749
default_domain = mydomain.com
}
[domain_realm]
.mydomain.com = MYDOMAIN.COM
mydomain.com = MYDOMAIN.COM
My /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf looks like:
[global]
realm = MYDOMAIN.COM
security = ads
password server = 10.4.1.13
workgroup = MYDOMAIN
netbios name = susesrv
server string = SAMBA SERVER
encrypt passwords = yes
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
printing = cups
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 1
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192
SO_SNDBUF=8192
local master = no
domain master = no
preferred master = no
wins server = 10.4.1.60
dns proxy = no
#===SHARE
DEFINITIONS===
[public]
path = /usr/public
browseable = yes
writeable = yes
guest ok = no
[printers]
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = yes
writeable = no
guest ok = yes
printable = yes
.COM
security = ads
password server = 10.4.1.13
workgroup = COLUMBIA
netbios name = susesrv
server string = IBM Aptiva in Joe's cube
encrypt passwords = yes
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
printing = cups
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 1
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192
SO_SNDBUF=8192
local master =
[Samba] Samba 3 with Unix passwd authentication?
We are a primarily Linux company with a NIS backend, but we keep a couple bridge boxes for Windows users (on a Windows PDC) to connect to their unix accounts and access data. Under Samba 2.2, this was fairly easy with encrypt passwords = no turned on. But I can't figure out how to make it work with Samba 3. Does Samba 3 not support a unix passwd backend, or am I just missing a configuration option? --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Wed Feb 11 10:02:49 2004 Author: tpot Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv1647 Modified Files: passdb.c Log Message: Move around function to fix build after recent static rampage. Revisions: passdb.c1.218 = 1.219 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/passdb.c.diff?r1=1.218r2=1.219
CVS update: samba/source/lib
Date: Wed Feb 11 10:30:46 2004 Author: tpot Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/lib In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6800/lib Modified Files: util.c Log Message: Applied James Peach's stack backtrace patch for IRIX. Revisions: util.c 1.411 = 1.412 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/lib/util.c.diff?r1=1.411r2=1.412
CVS update: samba/source
Date: Wed Feb 11 10:30:46 2004 Author: tpot Update of /data/cvs/samba/source In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6800 Modified Files: configure.in Log Message: Applied James Peach's stack backtrace patch for IRIX. Revisions: configure.in1.523 = 1.524 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/configure.in.diff?r1=1.523r2=1.524
CVS update: samba4/source/passdb
Date: Wed Feb 11 12:45:47 2004 Author: metze Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv424 Modified Files: pdb_guest.c pdb_ldap.c pdb_smbpasswd.c pdb_tdb.c pdb_unix.c Log Message: as I renamed the PDB subsystem to PASSDB, we need to rename the static init functions of the modules too:-) metze Revisions: pdb_guest.c 1.2 = 1.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/passdb/pdb_guest.c.diff?r1=1.2r2=1.3 pdb_ldap.c 1.3 = 1.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/passdb/pdb_ldap.c.diff?r1=1.3r2=1.4 pdb_smbpasswd.c 1.2 = 1.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c.diff?r1=1.2r2=1.3 pdb_tdb.c 1.2 = 1.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/passdb/pdb_tdb.c.diff?r1=1.2r2=1.3 pdb_unix.c 1.2 = 1.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/passdb/pdb_unix.c.diff?r1=1.2r2=1.3
CVS update: samba4/source/librpc/rpc
Date: Wed Feb 11 13:18:05 2004 Author: tridge Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/librpc/rpc In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6689 Modified Files: dcerpc_schannel.c Log Message: fixed a void return spotted by metze Revisions: dcerpc_schannel.c 1.3 = 1.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_schannel.c.diff?r1=1.3r2=1.4
CVS update: samba/source/utils
Date: Wed Feb 11 14:59:08 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/utils In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv27243/utils Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 net_rap.c net_rpc.c Log Message: BUG 1055; patch from SATOH Fumiyasu [EMAIL PROTECTED]; formatting fixes for 'net share' Revisions: net_rap.c 1.12.2.5 = 1.12.2.6 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/utils/net_rap.c.diff?r1=1.12.2.5r2=1.12.2.6 net_rpc.c 1.14.2.50 = 1.14.2.51 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/utils/net_rpc.c.diff?r1=1.14.2.50r2=1.14.2.51
CVS update: samba-docs/docbook/smbdotconf/filename
Date: Wed Feb 11 15:13:12 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba-docs/docbook/smbdotconf/filename In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30194/docbook/smbdotconf/filename Modified Files: maphidden.xml Log Message: BUG 1054; patch from SATOH Fumiyasu [EMAIL PROTECTED]; fix a few typos Revisions: maphidden.xml 1.3 = 1.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba-docs/docbook/smbdotconf/filename/maphidden.xml.diff?r1=1.3r2=1.4
CVS update: samba-docs/docbook/smbdotconf/locking
Date: Wed Feb 11 15:13:12 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba-docs/docbook/smbdotconf/locking In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30194/docbook/smbdotconf/locking Modified Files: locking.xml Log Message: BUG 1054; patch from SATOH Fumiyasu [EMAIL PROTECTED]; fix a few typos Revisions: locking.xml 1.3 = 1.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba-docs/docbook/smbdotconf/locking/locking.xml.diff?r1=1.3r2=1.4
CVS update: samba-docs/docbook/smbdotconf/winbind
Date: Wed Feb 11 15:13:12 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba-docs/docbook/smbdotconf/winbind In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30194/docbook/smbdotconf/winbind Modified Files: templateshell.xml Log Message: BUG 1054; patch from SATOH Fumiyasu [EMAIL PROTECTED]; fix a few typos Revisions: templateshell.xml 1.3 = 1.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba-docs/docbook/smbdotconf/winbind/templateshell.xml.diff?r1=1.3r2=1.4
CVS update: samba-docs/docbook/manpages
Date: Wed Feb 11 15:13:12 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba-docs/docbook/manpages In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30194/docbook/manpages Modified Files: smbtree.1.xml Log Message: BUG 1054; patch from SATOH Fumiyasu [EMAIL PROTECTED]; fix a few typos Revisions: smbtree.1.xml 1.2 = 1.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba-docs/docbook/manpages/smbtree.1.xml.diff?r1=1.2r2=1.3
CVS update: samba/source/sam
Date: Wed Feb 11 15:20:18 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/sam In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv32086/sam Modified Files: gums_api.c Log Message: fix broken compile after andrew's changes Revisions: gums_api.c 1.9 = 1.10 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/sam/gums_api.c.diff?r1=1.9r2=1.10
CVS update: samba/source/utils
Date: Wed Feb 11 15:20:41 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/utils In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv32288/utils Modified Files: net_rap.c net_rpc.c Log Message: BUG 1055; patch from SATOH Fumiyasu [EMAIL PROTECTED]; formatting fixes for 'net share' Revisions: net_rap.c 1.19 = 1.20 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/utils/net_rap.c.diff?r1=1.19r2=1.20 net_rpc.c 1.73 = 1.74 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/utils/net_rpc.c.diff?r1=1.73r2=1.74
CVS update: samba/source/client
Date: Wed Feb 11 15:39:11 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/client In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4801/client Modified Files: client.c Log Message: BUG 900: TAKEDA yasuma [EMAIL PROTECTED]; fix token processing in cmd_symlink, cmd_link, cmd_chown, cmd_chmod functions Revisions: client.c1.256 = 1.257 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/client/client.c.diff?r1=1.256r2=1.257
CVS update: samba/source
Date: Wed Feb 11 19:07:02 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5184 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 configure.in Log Message: Added James Peach's fix for #1038. Jeremy. Revisions: configure.in1.300.2.213 = 1.300.2.214 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/configure.in.diff?r1=1.300.2.213r2=1.300.2.214
CVS update: samba/source/lib
Date: Wed Feb 11 19:07:02 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/lib In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5184/lib Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 util.c Log Message: Added James Peach's fix for #1038. Jeremy. Revisions: util.c 1.358.2.43 = 1.358.2.44 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/lib/util.c.diff?r1=1.358.2.43r2=1.358.2.44
CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
Date: Wed Feb 11 19:59:14 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv21616/libsmb Modified Files: asn1.c Log Message: Paranoia fixes :-). Jeremy. Revisions: asn1.c 1.18 = 1.19 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/asn1.c.diff?r1=1.18r2=1.19
CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
Date: Wed Feb 11 19:59:17 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv21596/libsmb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 asn1.c Log Message: Paranoia fixes :-). Jeremy. Revisions: asn1.c 1.11.2.5 = 1.11.2.6 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/asn1.c.diff?r1=1.11.2.5r2=1.11.2.6
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Wed Feb 11 21:10:04 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2909/passdb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 pdb_tdb.c Log Message: fix set/getsampwent iterator in tdbsam to use an allocated list Revisions: pdb_tdb.c 1.58.2.26 = 1.58.2.27 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/pdb_tdb.c.diff?r1=1.58.2.26r2=1.58.2.27
CVS update: samba/source/utils
Date: Wed Feb 11 21:10:04 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/utils In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2909/utils Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 pdbedit.c Log Message: fix set/getsampwent iterator in tdbsam to use an allocated list Revisions: pdbedit.c 1.39.2.39 = 1.39.2.40 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/utils/pdbedit.c.diff?r1=1.39.2.39r2=1.39.2.40
CVS update: samba/source/client
Date: Wed Feb 11 21:42:20 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/client In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9452/client Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 client.c Log Message: BUG 900: TAKEDA yasuma [EMAIL PROTECTED]; fix token processing in cmd_symlink, cmd_link, cmd_chown, cmd_chmod functions Revisions: client.c1.209.2.46 = 1.209.2.47 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/client/client.c.diff?r1=1.209.2.46r2=1.209.2.47
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Wed Feb 11 22:47:12 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv23228/passdb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 pdb_tdb.c Log Message: Don't set an iterator to a piece of free'd memory, store it first. Jeremy. Revisions: pdb_tdb.c 1.58.2.27 = 1.58.2.28 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/pdb_tdb.c.diff?r1=1.58.2.27r2=1.58.2.28
