[Samba] samba3 smbpasswd search filter
Hi list I set up a samba 3 PDC with ldap authentification. Now i have some troubles concerning the machine account creation on the fly while joining the domain. I'm using the smbldap-tools 8.4 for user creation. According to the smbldap-tools howto and the samba3-ldap howto: http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/smb-ldap-3-howto.html, the ordinary way of creating a machine account is: /path/to/smbldap-tools/smbldap-useradd -w machinename$ That works without any problem but I can't join the domain. Now I could find the problem why it won't work. If I call smbpasswd to change the machines password in debug mode. I can see that this script has this search filter for ldap entries: ((uid=machinename$)(objectclass=sambaSamAccount)) However the entry that was done by the smbldap-useradd -w hasn't any objectclass sambaSamAccount. And as i thought after adding a sambaSamAccount objectclass to this machine account, I could join the domain. So where's the fault? I think the machine account don't need any objectclass sambaSamAccount so I have to change the search filter for smbpasswd or samba? And how to do this? I really welcome any suggestions best regards Lukas -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba printing and page counting
Try the CUPS printer drivers for windows.. (version 5 ??) they support page counting, coz it convert your printing page to a pdf format.. and then you can see the number of pages at one of the last lines.. easy to make a script who's filtering out the page numbers and prosses it to the account.. l8r - Collen Blijenberg (MLHJ) Thursday, March 4, 2004, 10:31:46 PM, you wrote: ML Hi, I'm running Samba printing services to share a printer on ML my Linux box with a network of windows machines. Everything works ML great. The only problem I am having is that I cannot count the ML number of pages printed by each user. ML My printers section looks like this: ML [printers] MLcomment = All Printers MLbrowseable = no MLguest ok = no MLpath = /var/spool/samba MLprintable = yes MLpublic = no MLcreate mask = 0700 MLprint command = lpr -P %p -o raw %s -r -J %m.%J MLlpq command = lpstat -o %p MLlprm command = cancel %p-%j ML If I had a script or escape sequence that would specify the ML number of pages of the print document I would have no problem ML writing a script to keep track of everything else. The easiest ML solution I see to my problem is if samba has a nice escape ML sequence, like %P or something, or if there was a little script I ML could pass the spool document to and it'd tell me. Since I'm ML printing raw, and the windows drivers are pcl, I doubt there's any ML script that would work. ML Any help is greatly appreciated. ML Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] 2.2.7 and getting old SID
Hello, Eric Freed wrote: I am trying to migrate from a Samba 2.2.7 PDC to Samba 3, and I need the old domain SID. 2.2.7 doe not have the net tools, so net getlocalsid will not work, the 2.2.7 version of smbpasswd does not have the -X option (which www.richardsharpe.com talked about) and tdbdump dumps the SID in HEX, but I don't think I can use that (and I have been unsuccessful in converting to ASCII)... Is there any way to get the SID in a usable format? I've done this for a samba 2.2.6 server. I used the code from samba 2.2.8 and compiled it with samba 2.2.6. Best regards, Carsten -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] XP pro profile error _samr_alias ...
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 20:06, Robert SKUBIJ wrote: I have problem while login into samba 2.2.8a PDC (debian woody) on windows XP Pro. User log display error: rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c: samr_query_aliasmem(2626) _samr_query_aliasmem: Not yet implemented. What is bad. I don't know. Please, help me. There is no issue, this is just not implemented. The only harm is to your logfile's size. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem with Winbindd not showing all Groups
Hi, I've downloaded and installed the samba 3.0.2 binary packages for Debian 3.0. The problem is, that if I do 'wbinfo -g' I only see a small number of groups, about 10, where there should be almost 30 groups. The 'wbinfo -u' works fine, I see all my users. Could it be that there is a problem with german 'Umlauts (äöü)'? I have some groups with these characters in it, but not all missing have them in it. Thanks for every suggestion, Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] (no subject)
Hi!!! i am a boy from latvia and I have samba 2.2.2 server. I have one problem. Samba works just with existing users, but don't accept new ones. It also don't accept sambas root passwd when I join the client to a domain. But in server I change passwords for old users, it don't accept new ones, but is still working with old passwords. What can be the problem? Kevins -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Best backend for member domain
OK its not a good question, but I'm just asking for suggestions. In purely samba controlled domain (with samba3+ldapsam), what is the best backend for member domain (servers) and linux (samba) clients? tdbsam +winbind or use same ldapbackend, for performance and maintainanble reasons. --beast -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Problem with Winbindd not showing all Groups
Hi, The problem is, that if I do 'wbinfo -g' I only see a small number of groups, about 10, where there should be almost 30 groups. The 'wbinfo -u' works fine, I see all my users. Could it be that there is a problem with german 'Umlauts (äöü)'? I have some groups with these characters in it, but not all missing have them in it. as far as I know, not only language specfic characters (like äüö) are a problem, but spaces in group or user names,too. Stefan -- * in-put GbR - Das Linux-Systemhaus Stefan-Michael Günther Moltkestraße 49 D-76133 Karlsruhe Tel./Fax : +49 (0)721 / 83044 - 98/93 http://www.in-put.de/ * Nachrichten, Musik und Spiele schnell und einfach per Quickstart im WEB.DE Screensaver - Gratis downloaden: http://screensaver.web.de/?mc=021110 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] getpwnam() fails! (with working nss_ldap setup)
Hi list, I've seen this error now many times (at my own setup and in the archives): sam_account_ok: Checking SMB password for user Simon Dassow [2004/03/05 12:54:19, 1] auth/auth_util.c:make_server_info_sam(821) User Simon Dassow in passdb, but getpwnam() fails! But: # id 'Simon Dassow' uid=1000(Simon Dassow) gid=513(Domain Users) groups=513(Domain Users), 512(Domain Admins) nss_ldap _is_ working... to verify this from another place (i'm using FreeBSD so there is no getent): # perl -e 'print join( - ,getpwnam(Simon Dassow)).\n' Simon Dassow - x - 1000 - 513 - 0 - - Simon Dassow - /home/dasi - /usr/local/bin/zsh - 0 If i logon with an `normal' unix account that has been added via `smbpasswd -a user' everything is working. Maybe someone has a hint for me. And before i forgot, that's my setup: FreeBSD 5.2.1 with nss_ldap (and yes, i have ldap in /etc/nsswitch.conf) OpenLDAP 2.0.27 Samba 3.0.1 smbldap-tools 0.8.4 Any help is appreciated. Regards, Simon signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Errors related to Samba in httpd log!
Hello list First and foremost to any developers listening - thank you for Samba - it is just brilliant. Apologies - this is a long post... I am not getting complaints about logon problems from users but I have noticed in /var/log/httpd/error_log, entries like the following for a few users when their logon scripts map drives to shares. Looking back I can see that it has been happening, since we installed samba some months ago. I suspect that the mappings are being accomplished ok, and that the below is some sort of side effect, because at least the netlogon share must be getting mapped successfully otherwise the other mappings would not be attempted, since they are applied by a login script located within the netlogon share. Also, for a given user logging on, not all their mappings produce an entry in the httpd log. For example between the two I have separated out below, several other mappings will have been done. Attached is smb.conf and kix login script. You will see that although there is a share intranet (= /disk1/data/intranet), the login script does not use it. Some more info is below - please ask for anything else that might help. This seems weird to me and I haven't a clue where to start looking. Has anyone come across this before or know where I should look to resolve it? TIA Bill A. [Thu Mar 4 18:36:17 2004] [error] [client 192.0.1.29] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/data [Thu Mar 4 19:43:22 2004] [error] [client 192.0.1.37] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/jmckb [Fri Mar 5 08:23:17 2004] [error] [client 192.0.1.35] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/netlogon [Fri Mar 5 08:23:24 2004] [error] [client 192.0.1.35] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/antivirus [Fri Mar 5 08:29:09 2004] [error] [client 192.0.1.35] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/aileen [Fri Mar 5 08:33:27 2004] [error] [client 192.0.1.34] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/netlogon [Fri Mar 5 08:33:35 2004] [error] [client 192.0.1.34] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/antivirus [Fri Mar 5 09:10:20 2004] [error] [client 192.0.1.35] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/aileen [Fri Mar 5 09:50:16 2004] [error] [client 192.0.1.35] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/aileen [Fri Mar 5 09:57:57 2004] [error] [client 192.0.30.27] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/netlogon [Fri Mar 5 09:57:59 2004] [error] [client 192.0.30.27] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/NETLOGON [Fri Mar 5 10:19:14 2004] [error] [client 192.0.1.35] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/aileen [Fri Mar 5 10:21:04 2004] [error] [client 192.0.1.35] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/personnel [Fri Mar 5 10:22:41 2004] [error] [client 192.0.1.34] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/accounts [Fri Mar 5 10:26:45 2004] [error] [client 192.0.20.184] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/netlogon [Fri Mar 5 10:26:52 2004] [error] [client 192.0.20.184] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/antivirus [Fri Mar 5 10:28:05 2004] [error] [client 192.0.30.27] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/data [Fri Mar 5 10:43:55 2004] [error] [client 192.0.1.35] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/data [Fri Mar 5 11:09:45 2004] [error] [client 192.0.1.35] File does not exist: /disk1/data/intranet/aileen My environment: linux SuSE SLES 8.0 kernel 2.4.19 samba 2.2.8 compiled from source apache 1.3.26 installed with distro clients Win XP Pro SP1a up-to-date with MS critical patches Further info: Apache document root is /disk1/data/intranet Mappings are applied by a kix login script with one exception (antivirus share) which is applied by /usr/local/samba/var/login.bat after it runs kix There are no corresponding entries in log.?mbd nor in log.clienthostname smb.conf: = [global] workgroup = BSWHQ netbios name = FILESERVER-E1 server string = HQ File Server and PDC add user script = cd /usr/local/sbin;smbldap-useradd.pl -w %u passwd program = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-passwd.pl %u guest account = guest log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m max log size = 50 security = user socket options = TCP_NODELAY interfaces = 192.0.1.102/24 127.0.0.1/8 domain admin group = @DomainAdmins enhanced browsing = no local master = yes os level = 64 domain master = yes preferred master = yes wins support = yes wins proxy = yes dns proxy = no name resolve order = wins bcast hosts remote announce = 192.0.110.101 192.0.30.101 192.0.20.101 192.0.40.101 remote browse sync = 192.0.110.101 192.0.30.101 192.0.20.101 192.0.40.101 encrypt passwords = yes unix password sync = yes passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *changed*
[Samba] printer configuration
Seem to have come to a dead end trying to configure a cups printer on a samba server. Been reading and googling till my eyes are about ready to google themselves. Anyway, it would be fantastic if one of you might have seen something I've missed. Setup: linux server running samba3. Also on the lan are a win95, winXP and linux box. smb.conf: [global] workgroup = HOME server string = valhalla# my hostname hosts allow = 192.168.1. 127. interfaces = eth1 # I have a cable modem on eth0 printing = cups printcap name = cups load printers = yes guest account = snorri # my user guest ok = yes map to guest = bad user insert log commands here security = user encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd [backup] comment = backup directory path = /mnt/backup writeable = yes guest ok = yes [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no printable = yes guest ok = yes writeable = no * Results: Backup directory share works fine - no problem here. testparm smb.conf verified ok smbclient -L valhalla lists directory and printer lp0 accurately smbclient //valhalla/lp0 is accessed no problem, but print textfile hangs until it gets a Call timed out response. tail /var/log/samba/valhalla.log shows up the message print cache expired for queue lp0 but nothing else ominous. all the nmblookup commands seem to work fine as well, it detects everything in the environs without too much hassle. the windows machine can see the printer if I set browseable to yes, but hangs if I try to do anything with it. lastly, firewall was off while I was testing. I also brought the eth0 interface down just in case it was causing problems. So I'm confounded and have no idea where to go from here! Thanks, Daniel. -- Daniel Stonier email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.optusnet.com.au/stonierd/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] What version started building libsmbclient.so?
Hello, I am trying to write a program that uses some smbclient features but am having trouble linking to libsmbclient. I only have libsmbclient.a installed on my machine (Redhat 9 Linux). I believe that the smbclient version on my updated system is 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix. All of the other libraries that I normally link to are xxx.so and so either I need to figure out how to link to an xxx.a library, or I need to find a version of the smbclient that builds the libsmbclient.so. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, -Steve McClellan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Printing and share problems
Hi everyone. I have installed samba 3.0.2 on slackware 9.0. I have a pentium iv 1.7 GHz with 256 MB of RAM and a harddrive of 40 GB. I'm supporting 32 machines so far. This is the thing. Most of the times computers loose connection or access to printers that were working fine. The same thing happens with share folders among computers. Does anyone have an answer to this issue that's killing me.. Best regards, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] upgrade samba-2.2.8 to samba-3.0.2a (umlauts)
Hi, we run a samba 2.2.8 server and like to migrate to a faster, new server running samba 3.0.2a. I thought to copy all files from the old to the new one mounting the new shares by nfs. For a test I copied some files using scp. A problem concernes the german umlauts: on the old server they aren't displayed if I ls the files while browsing the share works fine. If I copy the files to the new share, the files are visible in a terminal by e.g. ls, but not visible on the share mounted by my client :-( I'm using the default settings for character coding or the charset options. Any ideas how to solve my problem? Is ther a (easy) workaround? Thanks! Götz Reinicke -- Götz Reinicke IT Koordinator - IT OfficeNet Tel. +49 (0) 7141 - 969 420 Fax +49 (0) 7141 - 969 55 420 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg Mathildenstr. 20 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Printing and share problems
Anything out of the ordinary in your log files when the problem occurs? Can you post a snip of your smb.conf? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of mjynht Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Printing and share problems Hi everyone. I have installed samba 3.0.2 on slackware 9.0. I have a pentium iv 1.7 GHz with 256 MB of RAM and a harddrive of 40 GB. I'm supporting 32 machines so far. This is the thing. Most of the times computers loose connection or access to printers that were working fine. The same thing happens with share folders among computers. Does anyone have an answer to this issue that's killing me.. Best regards, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Errors related to Samba in httpd log!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi This although strange it seems to be the manifestation of the lot discussed webclient, which appeared in XP, and caused a lot of trouble to many people. If you would disable it on all of your clients, maybe that strange error messages should disappear. Cheers Geza -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFASJbo/PxuIn+i1pIRAhqgAKCy4omZ5O3LFeaoH2t2uYhMMz55kQCdG5+A 778FBxe0wi1qojY5F8TJIZA= =9Zir -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] preexec and simultaneous logins
While searching for a way to limit simultaneous logins to a samba PDC/BDC, I found suggestions about using a preexec script. This makes sense, I could plug such a script in the netlogon share and parse smbstatus or something to find out if the user has already logon. But... What do I do then to deny the logon? Kill the smbd process that is servicing this request? Won't the workstation just try again? Or send a winpopup message? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] NT4 Migration Question
A client has an existing NT4 domain with several NT4 servers. Two of the NT4 Servers function as a PDC and a BDC. We are installing Samba-3 on SuSE 9.0 Pro as a PDC with an LDAP backend, and decommissioning the NT4 PDC at the same time. So far, so good. We can also rebuild the old PDC hardware as a Samba-3 on SuSE 9.0 Pro BDC. Unfortunately however, the NT4 BDC cannot be removed from the network for another six months, as it hosts a vertical application key to the business and used every day by some 100 users at the client. In addition, the configuration of this BDC is quite complex; reinstalling the OS and the vertical application would be a challenge and, given the various customizations to the vertical application, not likely to succeed. Two questions then: 1. What are the implications of leaving this existing NT4 BDC in place with a new Linux-Samba-3 PDC (and possibly a new Linux-Samba BDC)? 2. Has anyone used UPromote, which claims to do be able to demote an NT4 BDC to a member server without reinstalling the OS? (See http://utools.com/UPromote.asp for more info.) Thanks! Mark -- __ L. Mark Stone President Reliable Networks of Maine, LLC 477 Congress Street, 5th Floor Portland, ME 04107 Tel: (207) 772-5678 Cell: (917) 597-2057 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.RNoME.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] NT4 Migration Question
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 08:53, L. Mark Stone wrote: A client has an existing NT4 domain with several NT4 servers. Two of the NT4 Servers function as a PDC and a BDC. We are installing Samba-3 on SuSE 9.0 Pro as a PDC with an LDAP backend, and decommissioning the NT4 PDC at the same time. So far, so good. We can also rebuild the old PDC hardware as a Samba-3 on SuSE 9.0 Pro BDC. Unfortunately however, the NT4 BDC cannot be removed from the network for another six months, as it hosts a vertical application key to the business and used every day by some 100 users at the client. In addition, the configuration of this BDC is quite complex; reinstalling the OS and the vertical application would be a challenge and, given the various customizations to the vertical application, not likely to succeed. Two questions then: 1. What are the implications of leaving this existing NT4 BDC in place with a new Linux-Samba-3 PDC (and possibly a new Linux-Samba BDC)? 2. Has anyone used UPromote, which claims to do be able to demote an NT4 BDC to a member server without reinstalling the OS? (See http://utools.com/UPromote.asp for more info.) Didn't know about #2 - interesting... I am functioning with previous WinNT4 PDC unchanged after net rpc vampire operation with the exception that netlogon service has been disabled. Has been working - I cannot use the UserManager etc. tools from this machine though. Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba Gigabit very very slow?
-Original Message- From: Hans Wilmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jonas Almquist wrote: Hi! I´m having trubbles with the speed on my samba server, Realtek 8169 Gigabit NIC Avoid Realtek NICs wherever you can. If FTP is fast and Samba is slow, I doubt the problem is the NIC. If the NIC were at fault FTP would be slow, too. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Solaris 9 --with-krb5 problems
Hi, I am running configure with the option --with-krb5=/opt/local which is where I have heimdal installed. The problem is that after running make, it still tries to use the include files from SUN that are in /usr/ and this screws up the compile. ## Mmm strange, I've not had any problems on Solaris 9 with MIT Kerberos... ## What files is it accidentally using, and in what way does this screw up your compile? Since I only need samba to be a PDC for my windows workstations, Should I just build it without kerberos support? I will store all samba user information in ldap and so authentication will be done against the ldap LMpasswd and NTpasswd entries and not through kerberos. This is my understanding so please correct me if I am wrong. ## I think there are some ways of implementing MIT KDC server with Samba as a PDC but this is not a normal configuration. ## If all you want is a Samba PDC using NTLM authentication then I do not beleive you need any Kerberos support ## hope this helps, Andy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Errors related to Samba in h
Will try on Monday morning and let you know. Many thanks for replying. Cheers Bill A. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 March 2004 15:05 To: Bill Allison Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mike Leitch Subject: Re: [Samba] Errors related to Samba in h -- -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi This although strange it seems to be the manifestation of the lot discussed webclient, which appeared in XP, and caused a lot of trouble to many people. If you would disable it on all of your clients, maybe that strange error messages should disappear. Cheers Geza -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFASJbo/PxuIn+i1pIRAhqgAKCy4omZ5O3LFeaoH2t2uYhMMz55kQCdG5+A 778FBxe0wi1qojY5F8TJIZA= =9Zir -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] DNS proxy is broken in 3.0.2a?
- Original Message - From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dmitry Melekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 6:00 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] DNS proxy is broken in 3.0.2a? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dmitry Melekhov wrote: | Today I upgraded 2.2.8a to 3.0.2a and now samba doesn't | work as dns proxy. Known issue currently: ~ https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607 Thank you! As I see this bug is known for a long time :-( But, if wins replication is still not supported, is there any way to change wins info without nmbd restart? We run samba in large enough network ( we are oil company ;-) ), and we use dns proxy as wins repication replacement... -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Solaris 9 --with-krb5 problems
The problem is with the header files. It tries to use the ones from Solaris 9 kerberos implementatoin which are located in /usr/include as opposed to the ones from heimdal in /opt/local/include). This happens using both cc and gcc. configure works fine but make fails. I also changed /var/ld/ld.config, but the problem is not the libraries, is the include files. This is what crle shows: oak:/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source % crle Configuration file [3]: /var/ld/ld.config Default Library Path (ELF): /opt/local/lib:/usr/lib Trusted Directories (ELF):/usr/lib/secure (system default) Command line: crle -c /var/ld/ld.config -l /opt/local/lib:/usr/lib The last few lines of configure are: snip checking how to build vfs_cap... shared Using libraries: LIBS = -lsendfile -lsec -lgen -lresolv -lsocket -lnsl -liconv KRB5_LIBS = -lcom_err -L/opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/lib -lgssapi -lkrb5 -lasn1 -L/opt/local/lib -lcrypto -lroken LDAP_LIBS = -lldap -llber AUTH_LIBS = checking configure summary... yes configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating include/stamp-h config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating script/findsmb config.status: creating smbadduser config.status: creating script/gen-8bit-gap.sh config.status: creating include/config.h Then when I type make: oak:/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source % make Using FLAGS = -O -I/opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/include -I/opt/local/include -Iinclude -I/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/include -I/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/ubiqx -I/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/smbwrapper -I. -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/include -I/opt/local/include -I/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source LIBS = -lsendfile -lsec -lgen -lresolv -lsocket -lnsl -liconv LDSHFLAGS = -G LDFLAGS = Generating smbd/build_options.c Building include/proto.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/include/proto.h Building include/wrepld_proto.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/include/wrepld_proto.h Building include/build_env.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/nsswitch/winbindd_proto.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/web/swat_proto.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/client/client_proto.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/utils/net_proto.h Compiling dynconfig.c In file included from include/includes.h:421, from dynconfig.c:21: /opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/include/gssapi.h:50: warning: redefinition of `OM_uint32' /usr/include/gssapi/gssapi.h:87: warning: `OM_uint32' previously declared here /opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/include/gssapi.h:52: warning: redefinition of `gss_uint32' /usr/include/gssapi/gssapi.h:64: warning: `gss_uint32' previously declared here /opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/include/gssapi.h:64: error: conflicting types for `gss_name_t' /usr/include/gssapi/gssapi.h:57: error: previous declaration of `gss_name_t' /opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/include/gssapi.h:76: error: conflicting types for `gss_ctx_id_t' . . . keeps going.. it is a long list . . /usr/include/gssapi/gssapi.h:695: error: previous declaration of `gss_seal' /opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/include/gssapi.h:765: error: conflicting types for `gss_unseal' /usr/include/gssapi/gssapi.h:704: error: previous declaration of `gss_unseal' make: *** [dynconfig.o] Error 1 Any ideas? -- Diego Julian Remolina System Administrator School of Mathematics Georgia Institute of Technology (404) 894-7385 (404) 894-1309 -- On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, ww m-pubsyssamba wrote: Hi, I am running configure with the option --with-krb5=/opt/local which is where I have heimdal installed. The problem is that after running make, it still tries to use the include files from SUN that are in /usr/ and this screws up the compile. ## Mmm strange, I've not had any problems on Solaris 9 with MIT Kerberos... ## What files is it accidentally using, and in what way does this screw up your compile? Since I only need samba to be a PDC for my windows workstations, Should I just build it without kerberos support? I will store all samba user information in ldap and so authentication will be done against the ldap LMpasswd and NTpasswd entries and not through kerberos. This is my understanding so please correct me if I am wrong. ## I think there are some ways of implementing MIT KDC server with Samba as a PDC but this is not a normal configuration. ## If all you want is a Samba PDC using NTLM authentication then I do not beleive you need any Kerberos support ## hope this helps, Andy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] SAMBA 3 as PDC - W2K/WXP Pro logon trouble
The machine accounts will show with the users they will be suffixed with a $. In the LDAP backend I have an SID for the domain name and an SID for the server itself which is not contained in LDAP. Then each computer and each user had two SID's (sambaSID and sambaPrimaryGroupSID) and the groups only have one SID (sambaSID). My discrepancy was in the domain name SID which was different than the servers SID. The groups and users matched the servers SID but the computers matched both the servers SID (sambaPrimaryGroupSID) and the wrong domain name SID from the LDAP entry (sambaSID). When I made all match the servers SID everything started working. I haven't worked with the smbpasswd as a PDC so I'm not sure where all the SID's are stored. -Original Message- From: Stumpfl Markus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:30 PM To: 'Scott Gross' Cc: MailingList_Samba Subject: AW: [Samba] SAMBA 3 as PDC - W2K/WXP Pro logon trouble Oh, so you are using ldap..., well I'm still working with smbpasswd as backend :-( Anyway, I tried 'net getlocalsid' for the domain-sid - ok Next 'net usersidlist' which should show me the user-sids - didn't work: [2004/03/04 06:40:05, 0, pid=31232, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] utils/net_rpc.c:net_usersidlist(2158) Could not get the user/sid list So used 'net user' instead, which then gave me the user list!? What am I missing here? And is there a way to see the machine sids too? Or are they included in the users? Thanks in advance, Markus -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Scott Gross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 03. März 2004 18:29 An: Stumpfl Markus Betreff: RE: [Samba] SAMBA 3 as PDC - W2K/WXP Pro logon trouble Wichtigkeit: Hoch I use a little windows gui program called LDAP browser to look at my LDAP entries and I was just looking through the entries at the SID's since someone suggested it might be an SID problem and noticed the discrepancy on the domain name entry. I changed it to match all the others just to see if it would have any effect and wallah it worked. -Original Message- From: Stumpfl Markus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 10:52 PM To: 'Scott Gross' Subject: AW: [Samba] SAMBA 3 as PDC - W2K/WXP Pro logon trouble Thx, but how did you find out? With what commands? Sry for the stupid questions, but I'm kinda knew to samba. Thanks in advance, Stumpfl Markus -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Scott Gross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 02. März 2004 18:14 An: Stumpfl Markus; Scott Gross Betreff: RE: [Samba] SAMBA 3 as PDC - W2K/WXP Pro logon trouble I got mine working it was SID mismatch. The Domain name SID was different from the server and the users. -Original Message- From: Stumpfl Markus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 11:22 PM To: 'Scott Gross' Subject: AW: [Samba] SAMBA 3 as PDC - W2K/WXP Pro logon trouble Do you get the problem (when trying domain logon): invalid password or domain? I've got the same prob... I'll tell you, when it's working and vice versa, hopefully ;-) Stumpfl Markus -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Scott Gross Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Februar 2004 18:25 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [Samba] SAMBA 3 as PDC - W2K/WXP Pro logon trouble I have a Samba 3 PDC running with an LDAP backend on Red Hat 8. All authentication appears to be working correctly but I can't login to the domain from a W2K or WXP Pro workstation after I have successfully joined them to the domain. If I login locally to the workstation I can browse the Samba shares just fine. I have checked the schannel and sign or seal settings on both the workstations and the server and made sure they were set to disable but still no luck. Can anyone give me any ideas on how to solve this problem. TIA Scott Smb.conf # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) # Date: 2003/11/25 10:42:04 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = FIFEDEV netbios name = Dev null passwords = Yes passdb backend = ldapsam passwd program = /usr/local/bin/smbldap-passwd.pl -o %u passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password:* %n\ *successfully* passwd chat debug = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
RE: [Samba] Solaris 9 --with-krb5 problems
## Ok as far as I'm aware the following is true, you must use MIT or Heimdal Kerberos with ## Solaris because Solaris Kerberos is not available with header files (Sun have no plans ## to include headers with their bundled distribution). Sun/MIT/Heimdal implementations of ## Kerberos are all gssapi compliant authentication mechanisms. ## You appear to have installed what looks like a second version of gssapi (I assume also Heimdal) ## which Samba make is not liking. I'm sorry I haven't tried installing Heimdal Kerberos myself, ## can you check whether it is possible to install/compile it without installing a duplicate ## implementation of gssapi? Or maybe someone else on the list can help? ## thanks Andy. The problem is with the header files. It tries to use the ones from Solaris 9 kerberos implementatoin which are located in /usr/include as opposed to the ones from heimdal in /opt/local/include). This happens using both cc and gcc. configure works fine but make fails. I also changed /var/ld/ld.config, but the problem is not the libraries, is the include files. This is what crle shows: oak:/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source % crle Configuration file [3]: /var/ld/ld.config Default Library Path (ELF): /opt/local/lib:/usr/lib Trusted Directories (ELF):/usr/lib/secure (system default) Command line: crle -c /var/ld/ld.config -l /opt/local/lib:/usr/lib The last few lines of configure are: snip checking how to build vfs_cap... shared Using libraries: LIBS = -lsendfile -lsec -lgen -lresolv -lsocket -lnsl -liconv KRB5_LIBS = -lcom_err -L/opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/lib -lgssapi -lkrb5 -lasn1 -L/opt/local/lib -lcrypto -lroken LDAP_LIBS = -lldap -llber AUTH_LIBS = checking configure summary... yes configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating include/stamp-h config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating script/findsmb config.status: creating smbadduser config.status: creating script/gen-8bit-gap.sh config.status: creating include/config.h Then when I type make: oak:/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source % make Using FLAGS = -O -I/opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/include -I/opt/local/include -Iinclude -I/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/include -I/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/ubiqx -I/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/smbwrapper -I. -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/include -I/opt/local/include -I/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source LIBS = -lsendfile -lsec -lgen -lresolv -lsocket -lnsl -liconv LDSHFLAGS = -G LDFLAGS = Generating smbd/build_options.c Building include/proto.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/include/proto.h Building include/wrepld_proto.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/include/wrepld_proto.h Building include/build_env.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/nsswitch/winbindd_proto.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/web/swat_proto.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/client/client_proto.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/utils/net_proto.h Compiling dynconfig.c In file included from include/includes.h:421, from dynconfig.c:21: /opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/include/gssapi.h:50: warning: redefinition of `OM_uint32' /usr/include/gssapi/gssapi.h:87: warning: `OM_uint32' previously declared here /opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/include/gssapi.h:52: warning: redefinition of `gss_uint32' /usr/include/gssapi/gssapi.h:64: warning: `gss_uint32' previously declared here /opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/include/gssapi.h:64: error: conflicting types for `gss_name_t' /usr/include/gssapi/gssapi.h:57: error: previous declaration of `gss_name_t' /opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/include/gssapi.h:76: error: conflicting types for `gss_ctx_id_t' . . . keeps going.. it is a long list . . /usr/include/gssapi/gssapi.h:695: error: previous declaration of `gss_seal' /opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/include/gssapi.h:765: error: conflicting types for `gss_unseal' /usr/include/gssapi/gssapi.h:704: error: previous declaration of `gss_unseal' make: *** [dynconfig.o] Error 1 Any ideas? -- Diego Julian Remolina System Administrator School of Mathematics Georgia Institute of Technology (404) 894-7385 (404) 894-1309 -- On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, ww m-pubsyssamba wrote: Hi, I am running configure with the option --with-krb5=/opt/local which is where I have heimdal installed. The problem is that after running make, it still tries to use the include files from SUN that are in /usr/ and this screws up the compile. ## Mmm strange, I've not had any problems on Solaris 9 with MIT Kerberos... ## What files is it accidentally using, and in what way does this screw up your compile? Since I only need samba to be a PDC for my windows workstations, Should I just build it without kerberos support? I will store all samba user information in ldap and so authentication will be done against the ldap LMpasswd and NTpasswd entries and not through kerberos. This is my understanding
[Samba] SMB gurus: please help - I am desperate.
I apologize up front for re-posting this, but I need to find a solution to this problem. I have been having hard time to believe that there isn't one person among the SMB gurus that doesn't know how a W2K client connects to an SMB server. So, if you happen to know even the slightest hint to this baffling problem, I would be forever grateful. OK. Here goes (original subject line was: Why does a W2K (pro) client do more than it is asked to do?) Desperate to find out why connecting to a samba share(on an AIX server) from W2K is so slow, I tried connecting to the same share from a Linux box, using smbclient: smbclient aixserver\\sharedir$ -U lynn The results were amazing. The connection was so MUCH FASTER then connecting from a W2K (pro) workstation: \\aixserver\sharedir$ (in the Start|Run edit box) When I examined the samba log files on the server, I could see why. The log file for the Linux client contained a single entry: [2004/02/23 11:55:35, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(636) linuxbox (192.168.0.4) connect to service sharedir$ as user lynn (uid=21776, gid=1) (pid 125438) So clean, so elegant, so beautiful! :) OTOH, the log file for the W2K client contained an entry similar to the above, but was immediately followed by about 30 messages of the form: [2004/02/23 11:59:03, 0] smbd/password.c:user_ok(683) rejected user nobody:3004-302 Your account has expired; please see the system administrator. Now... my question: Why? What does the W2K client do that triggers this barrage of rejected authentications of a user 'nobody' (that is clearly not allowed to enter)? More importantly, is there a way to configure EITHER the W2K client or the Samba server (or both) to not waste time on these unallowed accesses? Since smbclient produces such a clean entry, I would assume the fix must be on the client side (W2K) only. But I would take any advice. :) Please note that I am not allowed (in my corporate environment) to enable the guest account on this machine. Therefore, the solution must not involve enabling the guest account (if there is such a solution). My smb.conf global section has security=user (actually no 'security' entry, it simply takes the default, which is 'user'). The settings of the share are: [sharedir$] comment = %h shared dir path = /home/shared valid users = +sambagrp techsup browseable = No That's it. Any other settings are implied by taking the defaults. User account 'lynn' is a member of the group 'sambagrp' and as you can see from the original posting, it successfully authenticates from both a W2K client and a Linux client. 'techsup' is a special user account (may or may not be a member of 'sambagrp'). I hope this can give further clues to solving the mystery. Thanks in advance, Lynn (Samba 2.2.8a on AIX 5.1) __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SMB gurus: please help - I am desperate.
Read Implemeting CIFS, freely avaiblable in the web. =) On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 14:00, Linux Lover wrote: I apologize up front for re-posting this, but I need to find a solution to this problem. I have been having hard time to believe that there isn't one person among the SMB gurus that doesn't know how a W2K client connects to an SMB server. So, if you happen to know even the slightest hint to this baffling problem, I would be forever grateful. OK. Here goes (original subject line was: Why does a W2K (pro) client do more than it is asked to do?) Desperate to find out why connecting to a samba share(on an AIX server) from W2K is so slow, I tried connecting to the same share from a Linux box, using smbclient: smbclient aixserver\\sharedir$ -U lynn The results were amazing. The connection was so MUCH FASTER then connecting from a W2K (pro) workstation: \\aixserver\sharedir$ (in the Start|Run edit box) When I examined the samba log files on the server, I could see why. The log file for the Linux client contained a single entry: [2004/02/23 11:55:35, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(636) linuxbox (192.168.0.4) connect to service sharedir$ as user lynn (uid=21776, gid=1) (pid 125438) So clean, so elegant, so beautiful! :) OTOH, the log file for the W2K client contained an entry similar to the above, but was immediately followed by about 30 messages of the form: [2004/02/23 11:59:03, 0] smbd/password.c:user_ok(683) rejected user nobody:3004-302 Your account has expired; please see the system administrator. Now... my question: Why? What does the W2K client do that triggers this barrage of rejected authentications of a user 'nobody' (that is clearly not allowed to enter)? More importantly, is there a way to configure EITHER the W2K client or the Samba server (or both) to not waste time on these unallowed accesses? Since smbclient produces such a clean entry, I would assume the fix must be on the client side (W2K) only. But I would take any advice. :) Please note that I am not allowed (in my corporate environment) to enable the guest account on this machine. Therefore, the solution must not involve enabling the guest account (if there is such a solution). My smb.conf global section has security=user (actually no 'security' entry, it simply takes the default, which is 'user'). The settings of the share are: [sharedir$] comment = %h shared dir path = /home/shared valid users = +sambagrp techsup browseable = No That's it. Any other settings are implied by taking the defaults. User account 'lynn' is a member of the group 'sambagrp' and as you can see from the original posting, it successfully authenticates from both a W2K client and a Linux client. 'techsup' is a special user account (may or may not be a member of 'sambagrp'). I hope this can give further clues to solving the mystery. Thanks in advance, Lynn (Samba 2.2.8a on AIX 5.1) __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com -- |...| | _ _|Victor Medina M | |\ \ \| | _ \ / \ |Linux - Java - MySQL | | \ \ \ _| | |_) / _ \ |Dpto. Sistemas - Ferreteria EPA | | / / / |___| __/ ___ \ |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |/_/_/|_|_| /_/ \_\|ext. 325 - Tél: +58-241-8507325 | ||geek by nature - linux by choice | |...| -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] NT4 Migration Question
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, L. Mark Stone wrote: A client has an existing NT4 domain with several NT4 servers. Two of the NT4 Servers function as a PDC and a BDC. We are installing Samba-3 on SuSE 9.0 Pro as a PDC with an LDAP backend, and decommissioning the NT4 PDC at the same time. So far, so good. We can also rebuild the old PDC hardware as a Samba-3 on SuSE 9.0 Pro BDC. Unfortunately however, the NT4 BDC cannot be removed from the network for another six months, as it hosts a vertical application key to the business and used every day by some 100 users at the client. In addition, the configuration of this BDC is quite complex; reinstalling the OS and the vertical application would be a challenge and, given the various customizations to the vertical application, not likely to succeed. Two questions then: 1. What are the implications of leaving this existing NT4 BDC in place with a new Linux-Samba-3 PDC (and possibly a new Linux-Samba BDC)? The NT BDC will soon fall out of date with your Samba PDC (assuming you migrated the NT4 PDC to Samba-3). Samba-3 does not support the NT4 domain SAM replication protocols. You will soon have a broken network - unless you can deomte the NT4 BDC to a Stand-Alone server (which will stop it from performing domain control functions such as network logon handling and SAM replication). 2. Has anyone used UPromote, which claims to do be able to demote an NT4 BDC to a member server without reinstalling the OS? (See http://utools.com/UPromote.asp for more info.) That's a neat tool. It looks like it will permit you to demote the BDC to a Stand-Alone server, but be careful! You may find that the vertical application requires support for certain protocols that may not be supported by a Samba domain controller. You could test this by using Norton Ghost to clone the BDC, then demote the BDC using the UPromote tool, then test the application in a Samba domain. At least this will provide a conclusive answer. - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SMB gurus: please help - I am desperate.
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:00:33AM -0800, Linux Lover wrote: I apologize up front for re-posting this, but I need to find a solution to this problem. I have been having hard time to believe that there isn't one person among the SMB gurus that doesn't know how a W2K client connects to an SMB server. So, if you happen to know even the slightest hint to this baffling problem, I would be forever grateful. The problem is that the people who know why the Win2k redirector does all these things work at Microsoft. And they're not answering any questions. We know how the protocol works, and why the clients *shouldn't* do these stupid things, but only Microsoft knows why it does. They aren't telling and it seems that no one (including the US DoJ and the EU) can make them tell people why Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
FW: [Samba] What version started building libsmbclient.so?
Ok, I have been doing a lot of reading and saw many references to samba 2.2.8a and libsmbclient.so and I thought that I would just go ahead and download, compile and install it. After going through configure, the make and make install, I still don't have a libsmbclient.so file to link my program to. I have never come across this before, there has always been a .so file created from any of the other shared libraries that I have installed. What could be the problem? -Steve McClellan Hello, I am trying to write a program that uses some smbclient features but am having trouble linking to libsmbclient. I only have libsmbclient.a installed on my machine (Redhat 9 Linux). I believe that the smbclient version on my updated system is 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix. All of the other libraries that I normally link to are xxx.so and so either I need to figure out how to link to an xxx.a library, or I need to find a version of the smbclient that builds the libsmbclient.so. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, -Steve McClellan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SMB gurus: please help - I am desperate.
[2004/02/23 11:59:03, 0] smbd/password.c:user_ok(683) rejected user nobody:3004-302 Your account has expired; please see the system administrator. Have you tried setting up a proper guest account, instead of nobody? Either change the guest account setting in smb.conf or the nobody user on your AIX machine. -- Steven Kurylo -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Fwd: [Samba] second printer connection]
Original Message Subject:[Samba] second printer connection Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 14:17:44 -0600 From: Gregory W. Eckrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: samba [EMAIL PROTECTED] PROBLEM: unable to print to the 2nd of two printers on a samba host. ENVIRONMENT: -4 systems in a home network; connected to an HP Pro Curve hub (10 meg) -3 systems run Red Hat linux 9.0 (system names: snoopy, white, blue) -4th system runs Windows 2000 Professional (system name: red) -SAMBA server Snoopy has two directly attached printers, an HP 4L on LPT1 and an HP OfficeJet T45 on LPT2 Snoopy: 384 MEG RAM; celeron 400 Mhz SAMBA: ver 2.2.7a -On red: (Win2K) if a print job is sent to the HP_4L, it prints cleanly; if a print job is sent to the T45, it does not print Red: COMPAQ Deskpro 64 MEG RAM; Pentium 200 Mhz -On red: if one clicks start, run and types \\snoopy, all of the shares on snoopy are seen, including the two printers [Win2K troubleshooting says that this demonstrates a basic connection] -On red: either printer, upon being opened, reports in the title window: [printer] on snoopy, Access denied unable to connect CONDITIONS on Snoopy: -Both printers print correctly; various softwares see both printers -/etc/smb.conf Thanks, Greg. Eckrich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Why does a W2K (pro) client do more than it is asked to do?
--- Van Sickler, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lynn, Does your smb.conf have an entry similar to: username map = /etc/samba/smbusers Jim, thanks. This is my *entire* smb.conf file (created by SWAT): # # Samba config file created using SWAT # from winclient.mydomain.com (192.168.0.5) # Date: 2004/02/05 14:02:56 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = MYGROUP netbios name = AIXSERVER server string = Samba %V on %h admin log = Yes log level = 1 log file = /usr/local/samba/logs/%U.%m.log preferred master = No domain master = No hosts allow = 192.168. [sharedir$] comment = %h shared dir path = /home/shared valid users = +sambagrp techsup browseable = No # So, I guess I don't have such an entry. Do I need one? I thought it's not necessary since the W2K client prompts the user anyway to enter username and password. One of the good things about W2K (vs. w9x) is that you can be logged into the W2K client as 'mary', but authenticate to the samba server as 'fred'. Do you have user accounts on both the AIX box and the W2k box? They'd be mapped in smbusers, AIX_acct=W2k_acct Again, no need - I am counting on the W2K client to prompt for password if that particular username not found in /etc/password (at the moment I *don't* use encrypted passwords - I will cross that bridge when I solve this problem first). BTW, I increased the log level to 3 and noticed the first occurrence of 'nobody' in the log after I type my username and password: - [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(349) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(880) Domain=[] NativeOS=[Windows 2000 2195] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2000 5.0] [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(890) sesssetupX:name=[] [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(312) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(310) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(349) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2004/03/05 13:22:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(183) get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: -2 [2004/03/05 13:22:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(493) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/03/05 13:22:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(183) get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: -2 [2004/03/05 13:22:08, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(361) uid -2 registered to name nobody - Which brings the question: what is register_vuid()? and uid -2 is being sent by W2K? (my uid is 21776) Thanks, Lynn __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem w. SAMBA as dfs root
Hi, I have configured samba 3.0.2 as Dfs root but it seems smbd dont translate symlink to remote share name. All targeted shares are from testing workstation directly accessible. My config is: --- [global] debuglevel = 10 netbios name = SAMBAII workgroup = XAMBA security = user domain logons = yes preferred master = yes domain master = yes local master = yes os level = 33 encrypt passwords = yes passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://ldap.setuza.cz; ## ldap sam ... ## dfs host msdfs = yes ... ## misc follow symlinks = yes ... ## shares writeable = no create mask = 660 directory mask = 770 ... [dfs] path = /var/samba/dfsroot msdfs root = yes follow symlinks = no [test] ... --- My dfs root is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# ls -ld /var/samba /var/samba/dfsroot drwxrwx---7 Domain U 4096 Mar 4 19:07 /var/samba/ drwxr-xr-x2 root Domain U 4096 Mar 5 17:17 /var/samba/dfsroot/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# ls -l /var/samba/dfsroot total 0 lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 21 Mar 5 17:17 inoupd - msdfs:rumba\\inoupdate lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 16 Mar 5 17:01 lavir - msdfs:prog23t\\lv lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 19 Mar 4 19:20 pokus - msdfs:prog01t\\share In logfile I found target name only in this line: ... [2004/03/05 19:23:23, 5] msdfs/msdfs.c:is_msdfs_link(201) is_msdfs_link: ./inoupd - msdfs:rumba\inoupdate [2004/03/05 19:23:23, 5] smbd/trans2.c:get_lanman2_dir_entry(573) get_lanman2_dir_entry: Masquerading msdfs link ./inoupd as a directory ... and then interesting part: ... [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 5] smbd/statcache.c:stat_cache_add(178) stat_cache_add: Added entry INOUPD - inoupd [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(388) conversion finished inoupd - inoupd [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(110) unix_mode(inoupd) returning 0660 [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 5] smbd/files.c:file_new(122) allocated file structure 9316, fnum = 13412 (1 used) [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(838) open_file_shared: fname = inoupd, share_mode = 8040, ofun = 1, mode = 660, oplock request = 3 [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1474) is_in_path: inoupd [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1478) is_in_path: no name list. [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(580) unix_clean_name [inoupd] [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 3] smbd/filename.c:check_name(423) check_name: denied: file path name inoupd is a symlink [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 5] smbd/filename.c:check_name(430) check_name on inoupd failed [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 5] smbd/files.c:file_free(385) freed files structure 13412 (0 used) [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 10] smbd/trans2.c:set_bad_path_error(1802) set_bad_path_error: err = 0 bad_path = 0 [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(118) error packet at smbd/trans2.c(1811) cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED ... Thanks for any suggestions M. Vancl -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Why does a W2K (pro) client do more than it is asked to do?
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Linux Lover wrote: --- Van Sickler, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lynn, Does your smb.conf have an entry similar to: username map = /etc/samba/smbusers Jim, thanks. This is my *entire* smb.conf file (created by SWAT): # # Samba config file created using SWAT # from winclient.mydomain.com (192.168.0.5) # Date: 2004/02/05 14:02:56 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = MYGROUP netbios name = AIXSERVER server string = Samba %V on %h admin log = Yes log level = 1 log file = /usr/local/samba/logs/%U.%m.log preferred master = No domain master = No hosts allow = 192.168. [sharedir$] comment = %h shared dir path = /home/shared valid users = +sambagrp techsup browseable = No # So, I guess I don't have such an entry. Do I need one? I thought it's not necessary since the W2K client prompts the user anyway to enter username and password. One of the good things about W2K (vs. w9x) is that you can be logged into the W2K client as 'mary', but authenticate to the samba server as 'fred'. Do you have user accounts on both the AIX box and the W2k box? They'd be mapped in smbusers, AIX_acct=W2k_acct Again, no need - I am counting on the W2K client to prompt for password if that particular username not found in /etc/password (at the moment I *don't* use encrypted passwords - I will cross that bridge when I solve this problem first). Ok. Consider yourself right at that bridge now - unless of course you have applied the registry hack to enable plain-text passwords on ALL win2k clients. PS: If you have enabled plain-text passworrds, rest assured it will still break because since Microsoft disabled this by default they have not maintained support for it. PPS: I strongly suggest that you add encrypted passwords for your users by running for each user: smbpasswd -a 'username' Just out of curiosity, have you read the Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf, or the printed form of it The Official Samba-3 HOWTO and Reference Guide (available from Amazon.Com)? You can obtain the Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf from: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf The chapters on Server Types and Security Modes, Domain Member Servers, Stand-Alone Servers, and Network Browsing might prove helpful to you. Cheers, John T. BTW, I increased the log level to 3 and noticed the first occurrence of 'nobody' in the log after I type my username and password: - [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(349) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(880) Domain=[] NativeOS=[Windows 2000 2195] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2000 5.0] [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(890) sesssetupX:name=[] [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(312) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(310) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(349) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2004/03/05 13:22:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(183) get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: -2 [2004/03/05 13:22:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(493) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/03/05 13:22:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(183) get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: -2 [2004/03/05 13:22:08, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(361) uid -2 registered to name nobody - Which brings the question: what is register_vuid()? and uid -2 is being sent by W2K? (my uid is 21776) Thanks, Lynn __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba + Win2k
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 12:34, John H Terpstra wrote: On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Guylerme Velasco wrote: How can i get a trust relationship betwen Samba Domain and Win2k ? Ive tried many ways like, change win2k register, changig some security directives, etc. The win2k is added at Samba Domain like this useradd -g MYGROUP -d /dev/null -s /bin/false WIN2k$ smbpasswd -a -m WIN2K$ Is there other way?? Reading the chapter on Interdomain Trust Relationships in the Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf is a good place to start. http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf -- I think John misunderstood the question. Generally, when you have things set up right, you could probably join machines to a domain simply by using the Windows Networking Wizard from 'System' control panel. The implementation of smb.conf / etc. will differ on different OS's and the type of 'backend' storage you specify for holding this info and of course, the version of samba that you are using - none of which you included. Generally, the way I have had success is to add root to the smb database... smbpasswd -a root Then when it asks you the name of someone who is authorized to add the account to the domain, it would be root with whatever password you assigned to root. Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Solaris 9 --with-krb5 problems
Hi Andy, ## Ok as far as I'm aware the following is true, you must use MIT or Heimdal Kerberos with ## Solaris because Solaris Kerberos is not available with header files (Sun have no plans ## to include headers with their bundled distribution). Sun/MIT/Heimdal implementations of ## Kerberos are all gssapi compliant authentication mechanisms. I think the above is not correct, as you can see from the following commands; the header files for gssapi are part of the package SUNWhea: oak:/etc/openldap/ldif # pkgchk -lp /usr/include/gssapi/gssapi.h Pathname: /usr/include/gssapi/gssapi.h Type: regular file Expected mode: 0644 Expected owner: root Expected group: bin Expected file size (bytes): 22478 Expected sum(1) of contents: 31395 Expected last modification: Apr 06 14:12:32 2002 Referenced by the following packages: SUNWhea Current status: installed oak:/etc/openldap/ldif # pkginfo -l SUNWhea PKGINST: SUNWhea NAME: SunOS Header Files CATEGORY: system ARCH: sparc VERSION: 11.9.0,REV=2002.04.06.15.27 BASEDIR: / VENDOR: Sun Microsystems, Inc. DESC: SunOS C/C++ header files for general development of software PSTAMP: leo20030527173442 INSTDATE: Dec 30 2003 16:31 HOTLINE: Please contact your local service provider STATUS: completely installed FILES: 1323 installed pathnames 32 shared pathnames 85 directories 16086 blocks used (approx) ## You appear to have installed what looks like a second version of gssapi (I assume also Heimdal) ## which Samba make is not liking. I'm sorry I haven't tried installing Heimdal Kerberos myself, ## can you check whether it is possible to install/compile it without installing a duplicate ## implementation of gssapi? Or maybe someone else on the list can help? ## thanks Andy. I am using heimdal because it is thread safe while mit kerberos is not. This is very important for my openldap server. Would you please check if your system has the package SUNWhea installed? If it is then you should have some header files like /usr/include/gssapi/gssapi.h The conflicting header files are not part of any of Sun's kerberos packages SUNWkrbr, SUNWkrbu or SUNWkrbux which I have installed since those provide authentication. I did not want to have to remove all the Sun kerberos packages since I am using the pam_krb5.so from those packages in my pam stack to authenticate users. Even if I remove the kerberos packages the header files will remain there so I do not think removing those kerberos packages will help. Have a good weekend, Diego The problem is with the header files. It tries to use the ones from Solaris 9 kerberos implementatoin which are located in /usr/include as opposed to the ones from heimdal in /opt/local/include). This happens using both cc and gcc. configure works fine but make fails. I also changed /var/ld/ld.config, but the problem is not the libraries, is the include files. This is what crle shows: oak:/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source % crle Configuration file [3]: /var/ld/ld.config Default Library Path (ELF): /opt/local/lib:/usr/lib Trusted Directories (ELF):/usr/lib/secure (system default) Command line: crle -c /var/ld/ld.config -l /opt/local/lib:/usr/lib The last few lines of configure are: snip checking how to build vfs_cap... shared Using libraries: LIBS = -lsendfile -lsec -lgen -lresolv -lsocket -lnsl -liconv KRB5_LIBS = -lcom_err -L/opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/lib -lgssapi -lkrb5 -lasn1 -L/opt/local/lib -lcrypto -lroken LDAP_LIBS = -lldap -llber AUTH_LIBS = checking configure summary... yes configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating include/stamp-h config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating script/findsmb config.status: creating smbadduser config.status: creating script/gen-8bit-gap.sh config.status: creating include/config.h Then when I type make: oak:/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source % make Using FLAGS = -O -I/opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/include -I/opt/local/include -Iinclude -I/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/include -I/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/ubiqx -I/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/smbwrapper -I. -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/opt/local/encap/heimdal-0.6/include -I/opt/local/include -I/tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source LIBS = -lsendfile -lsec -lgen -lresolv -lsocket -lnsl -liconv LDSHFLAGS = -G LDFLAGS = Generating smbd/build_options.c Building include/proto.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/include/proto.h Building include/wrepld_proto.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/include/wrepld_proto.h Building include/build_env.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/nsswitch/winbindd_proto.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/web/swat_proto.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/client/client_proto.h creating /tmp/samba-3.0.2a/source/utils/net_proto.h Compiling dynconfig.c In file
Re: [Samba] NT4 Migration Question
Hi John! On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 13:14, John H Terpstra wrote: On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, L. Mark Stone wrote: A client has an existing NT4 domain with several NT4 servers. Two of the NT4 Servers function as a PDC and a BDC. We are installing Samba-3 on SuSE 9.0 Pro as a PDC with an LDAP backend, and decommissioning the NT4 PDC at the same time. So far, so good. We can also rebuild the old PDC hardware as a Samba-3 on SuSE 9.0 Pro BDC. Unfortunately however, the NT4 BDC cannot be removed from the network for another six months, as it hosts a vertical application key to the business and used every day by some 100 users at the client. In addition, the configuration of this BDC is quite complex; reinstalling the OS and the vertical application would be a challenge and, given the various customizations to the vertical application, not likely to succeed. Two questions then: 1. What are the implications of leaving this existing NT4 BDC in place with a new Linux-Samba-3 PDC (and possibly a new Linux-Samba BDC)? The NT BDC will soon fall out of date with your Samba PDC (assuming you migrated the NT4 PDC to Samba-3). Samba-3 does not support the NT4 domain SAM replication protocols. You will soon have a broken network - unless you can deomte the NT4 BDC to a Stand-Alone server (which will stop it from performing domain control functions such as network logon handling and SAM replication). Yup, we know that SAM replication isn't there between NT4 and Samba. The other option we've uncovered is to dcpromo the NT4 server to a PDC, migrate the accounts to the Samba server (which will also think its the PDC), and then shut off LMAnnounce on the NT4 server via a registry entry. (we would decommission the other NT4 DC.) We may also try disabling the NT4's Server service as well. The critical application relies on Exchange 5.5, which also runs on this NT4 server. We have been told that Exchange may fail if it wakes up after a reboot and finds it is no longer living on a DC. So, turning off LMAnnounce (we believe) will result in the NT4 box thinking it is still a PDC, but no clients on the network will ever talk to it, so it will just be a lonely PDC. And if Exchange needs PDC services, those will still be available locally. The domain user accounts used by Exchange are not person-specific, so they will never change and we need not worry about maintaining perfect correlation between Samba and this NT4 box. We just need to make sure the NT4 box can't ever perform DC services on the domain. 2. Has anyone used UPromote, which claims to do be able to demote an NT4 BDC to a member server without reinstalling the OS? (See http://utools.com/UPromote.asp for more info.) That's a neat tool. It looks like it will permit you to demote the BDC to a Stand-Alone server, but be careful! You may find that the vertical application requires support for certain protocols that may not be supported by a Samba domain controller. The app's domain needs are limited to moving files around between this box and three others via mapped drives. The box should still be able to browse the network, so I think we are probably OK. The trick bits for the app are the ways it moves and processes files through Exchange. You could test this by using Norton Ghost to clone the BDC, then demote the BDC using the UPromote tool, then test the application in a Samba domain. At least this will provide a conclusive answer. I too like to have rollback options! If we did the dcpromo trick above, and it didn't work, we could always put the other NT4 DC (now the BDC) back online, run dcpromo again to make the problem NT4 box a BDC, and try your Ghost/UPromote trick (also reversible). What do you think of the isolated PDC strategy above? Thanks! Mark -- __ L. Mark Stone President Reliable Networks of Maine, LLC 477 Congress Street, 5th Floor Portland, ME 04107 Tel: (207) 772-5678 Cell: (917) 597-2057 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.RNoME.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: FW: [Samba] What version started building libsmbclient.so?
John, Thanks, I had just resorted to reading the configure file and found that the default was not to create it. So you confirm what I found. I'm still not able to link against it though. I get an undefined reference to smbc_init error, but at least I have the library. -Steve -Original Message- From: John H Terpstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 2:02 PM To: Steven McClellan Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: [Samba] What version started building libsmbclient.so? On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Steven McClellan wrote: Ok, I have been doing a lot of reading and saw many references to samba 2.2.8a and libsmbclient.so and I thought that I would just go ahead and download, compile and install it. After going through configure, the make and make install, I still don't have a libsmbclient.so file to link my program to. I have never come across this before, there has always been a .so file created from any of the other shared libraries that I have installed. What could be the problem? Did you specify: configure --with-libsmbclient Did you run: make libsmbclient - John T. -Steve McClellan Hello, I am trying to write a program that uses some smbclient features but am having trouble linking to libsmbclient. I only have libsmbclient.a installed on my machine (Redhat 9 Linux). I believe that the smbclient version on my updated system is 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix. All of the other libraries that I normally link to are xxx.so and so either I need to figure out how to link to an xxx.a library, or I need to find a version of the smbclient that builds the libsmbclient.so. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, -Steve McClellan -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Why does a W2K (pro) client do more than it is asked to do?
Lynn, Since I don't see Encrypt Passwords = No in your smb.conf, I'm pretty sure that you're using encrypted passwords. Run testparm, and look for the Encrypt Passwords = entry, just to be sure. Having the users mapped in the smbusers will take care of the prompt. If you want to map drives using a different user name, this might make it easier. If mary is logged in, but wants to map a drive as lynn, as long as smbusers has entries for both mary lynn, it should work. W9x PCs will do that, I think, if you include /user with the net use command. You can try adding the users to the smbusers file, without creating an AIX account for them. The see if they can access the share without being prompted for the password. If that works, see if they can map a drive using a different user name. Jim -Original Message- From: Linux Lover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 12:43 PM To: Van Sickler, Jim; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Samba] Why does a W2K (pro) client do more than it is asked to do? --- Van Sickler, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lynn, Does your smb.conf have an entry similar to: username map = /etc/samba/smbusers Jim, thanks. This is my *entire* smb.conf file (created by SWAT): # # Samba config file created using SWAT # from winclient.mydomain.com (192.168.0.5) # Date: 2004/02/05 14:02:56 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = MYGROUP netbios name = AIXSERVER server string = Samba %V on %h admin log = Yes log level = 1 log file = /usr/local/samba/logs/%U.%m.log preferred master = No domain master = No hosts allow = 192.168. [sharedir$] comment = %h shared dir path = /home/shared valid users = +sambagrp techsup browseable = No # So, I guess I don't have such an entry. Do I need one? I thought it's not necessary since the W2K client prompts the user anyway to enter username and password. One of the good things about W2K (vs. w9x) is that you can be logged into the W2K client as 'mary', but authenticate to the samba server as 'fred'. Do you have user accounts on both the AIX box and the W2k box? They'd be mapped in smbusers, AIX_acct=W2k_acct Again, no need - I am counting on the W2K client to prompt for password if that particular username not found in /etc/password (at the moment I *don't* use encrypted passwords - I will cross that bridge when I solve this problem first). BTW, I increased the log level to 3 and noticed the first occurrence of 'nobody' in the log after I type my username and password: - [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(349) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(880) Domain=[] NativeOS=[Windows 2000 2195] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2000 5.0] [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(890) sesssetupX:name=[] [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(312) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(310) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/03/05 13:22:07, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(349) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2004/03/05 13:22:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(183) get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: -2 [2004/03/05 13:22:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(493) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/03/05 13:22:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(183) get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: -2 [2004/03/05 13:22:08, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(361) uid -2 registered to name nobody - Which brings the question: what is register_vuid()? and uid -2 is being sent by W2K? (my uid is 21776) Thanks, Lynn __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you're looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] NT4 Migration Question
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 11:34, Craig White wrote: I am functioning with previous WinNT4 PDC unchanged after net rpc vampire operation with the exception that netlogon service has been disabled. Has been working - I cannot use the UserManager etc. tools from this machine though. Because Exchange 5.5 also lives on this box, we are concerned that we will break Exchange if we disable the netlogon service. But it's good to know that someone else is suffering through this successfully! Thanks! Mark -- __ L. Mark Stone President Reliable Networks of Maine, LLC 477 Congress Street, 5th Floor Portland, ME 04107 Tel: (207) 772-5678 Cell: (917) 597-2057 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.RNoME.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Cannot find KDC for requested realm while getting initial credentials
Have succesfully installed and configured samba on BSD up to the point
of joining the active directory domain.
The command net ads join -Uadministrator returned a message saying
that i had sucessfully joined the domain and a quick review of my ADDC
shows that my samba server has sucessfully joined and created an object
in AD. The command wbinfo -u returns a list of AD domain accounts.
At this point things break down and it seems to be a kerberos problem.
I'm the original/eternal BSD noob, any thoughts as to what i'm doing wrong?
Error messages:
su-2.05b# ./smbclient -L localhost -Uadministrator
session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
___
su-2.05b# kinit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kinit(v5): Cannot find KDC for requested realm while getting initial
credentials
___
su-2.05b# klist
klist: No credentials cache found (ticket cache FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0)
Kerberos 4 ticket cache: /tmp/tkt0
klist: You have no tickets cached
My conf files:
krb5.conf
[logging]
default = FILE:/var/log/krb5libs.log
kdc = FILE:/var/log/krb5kdc.log
admin_server = FILE:/var/log/kadmind.log
[libdefaults]
ticket_lifetime = 24000
default_realm = ADTEST.GC.MARICOPA.EDU
dns_lookup_realm = false
dns_lookup_kdc = false
[realms]
ADTEST.GC.MARICOPA.EDU = {
kdc = server.adtest.gc.maricopa.edu:88
admin_server = server.adtest.gc.maricopa.edu:749
default_domain = adtest.gc.maricopa.edu
}
[domain_realm]
.adtest.gc.maricopa.edu = ADTEST.GC.MARICOPA.EDU
adtest.gc.maricopa.edu = ADTEST.GC.MARICOPA.EDU
[kdc]
profile = /var/kerberos/krb5kdc/kdc.conf
[appdefaults]
pam = {
debug = false
ticket_lifetime = 36000
renew_lifetime = 36000
forwardable = true
krb4_convert = false
}
smb.conf
[global]
workgroup = ADTEST
netbios name = BURP
realm = ADTEST.GC.MARICOPA.EDU
security = ads
encrypt passwords = yes
password server = server.adtest.gc.maricopa.edu
wins server = server.adtest.gc.maricopa.edu
name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
server string = FreeBSD Samba Server
log level = 2
# socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=2000 SO_RCVBUF=2000
#New test options
#winbind separator = .
winbind cache time = 10
winbind enum users = yes
winbind enum groups = yes
#winbind use default domain = yes
template shell = /bin/bash
template homedir = /home/%D/%U
idmap uid = 1-2
idmap gid = 1-2
# Share Definitions
==
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem printing From Windows to Linux
Hi, This is my first message to the list. I have Linux server with two printers: - SuSE Linux 9.0 + CUPS + Samba - HP Laserjet 1100 (LPT) - Canon i470d (USB) All windows stations print fine with Laserjet, but fails with the other one. The printer job is scheduled correctly on linux server. Printer leds blink due to data reception but no data is printed Symptoms are similar to printing with an inappropiate driver. Is there any concept I must review? Thank's in advance. -- Gabriel D. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] NT4 Migration Question
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 14:08, L. Mark Stone wrote: On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 11:34, Craig White wrote: I am functioning with previous WinNT4 PDC unchanged after net rpc vampire operation with the exception that netlogon service has been disabled. Has been working - I cannot use the UserManager etc. tools from this machine though. Because Exchange 5.5 also lives on this box, we are concerned that we will break Exchange if we disable the netlogon service. But it's good to know that someone else is suffering through this successfully! --- I'll bet you $1 that this works Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] NT4 Migration Question
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, L. Mark Stone wrote: Hi John! On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 13:14, John H Terpstra wrote: On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, L. Mark Stone wrote: A client has an existing NT4 domain with several NT4 servers. Two of the NT4 Servers function as a PDC and a BDC. We are installing Samba-3 on SuSE 9.0 Pro as a PDC with an LDAP backend, and decommissioning the NT4 PDC at the same time. So far, so good. We can also rebuild the old PDC hardware as a Samba-3 on SuSE 9.0 Pro BDC. Unfortunately however, the NT4 BDC cannot be removed from the network for another six months, as it hosts a vertical application key to the business and used every day by some 100 users at the client. In addition, the configuration of this BDC is quite complex; reinstalling the OS and the vertical application would be a challenge and, given the various customizations to the vertical application, not likely to succeed. Two questions then: 1. What are the implications of leaving this existing NT4 BDC in place with a new Linux-Samba-3 PDC (and possibly a new Linux-Samba BDC)? The NT BDC will soon fall out of date with your Samba PDC (assuming you migrated the NT4 PDC to Samba-3). Samba-3 does not support the NT4 domain SAM replication protocols. You will soon have a broken network - unless you can deomte the NT4 BDC to a Stand-Alone server (which will stop it from performing domain control functions such as network logon handling and SAM replication). Yup, we know that SAM replication isn't there between NT4 and Samba. The other option we've uncovered is to dcpromo the NT4 server to a PDC, migrate the accounts to the Samba server (which will also think its the PDC), and then shut off LMAnnounce on the NT4 server via a registry entry. (we would decommission the other NT4 DC.) We may also try disabling the NT4's Server service as well. The critical application relies on Exchange 5.5, which also runs on this NT4 server. We have been told that Exchange may fail if it wakes up after a reboot and finds it is no longer living on a DC. So, turning off LMAnnounce (we believe) will result in the NT4 box thinking it is still a PDC, but no clients on the network will ever talk to it, so it will just be a lonely PDC. And if Exchange needs PDC services, those will still be available locally. The domain user accounts used by Exchange are not person-specific, so they will never change and we need not worry about maintaining perfect correlation between Samba and this NT4 box. We just need to make sure the NT4 box can't ever perform DC services on the domain. Exchange 5.5 can be made to work with a Samba PDC. You will need to search the Samba mailing list archives to find clear instructions someone once posted on how to affect this. Do not mess with the NT4 registry or the Server service - this will potentially cripple your BDC server. Fortunately, a DBC will not change the SAM database, rather an NT4 BDC creates on the BDC a SAM delta file. The BDC depends on the PDC SAM replication service to synchronize that delta file to the PDC where it can be applied to the PDC SAM. The PDC SAM replication service then pushes that change back to the BDCs. This means that if Samba-3 is your PDC and you use an NT4 BDC you can lose machine security account password changes. This can result in breakdown in network security. The Samba-Team official line on NT4 PDC / Samba-3 BDC, or Samba-3 PDC and NT4 BDC, is that this can not work. You could isolate your BDC from the rest of the network, then promote it to a PDC. That will make Exchange happy and should keep your application happy, but it also disconnects the NT4 system from communication with the rest of the network. If the NT4 server must have network connectivity (interoperability) it should be demoted from being a BDC to a Stand-Alone server, then rejoin it to the Samba-3 domain. When you have done this, you will need to make registry changes so that Exchange can find the Samba-3 DCs. The main concern is not the domain control protocols - but rather how what services the application you have referred to needs. 2. Has anyone used UPromote, which claims to do be able to demote an NT4 BDC to a member server without reinstalling the OS? (See http://utools.com/UPromote.asp for more info.) That's a neat tool. It looks like it will permit you to demote the BDC to a Stand-Alone server, but be careful! You may find that the vertical application requires support for certain protocols that may not be supported by a Samba domain controller. The app's domain needs are limited to moving files around between this box and three others via mapped drives. The box should still be able to browse the network, so I think we are probably OK. The trick bits for the app are the ways it moves and processes files through Exchange. Are you sure that the application does not use any RPC calls to the domain? You
Re: [Samba] NT4 Migration Question
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 14:08, L. Mark Stone wrote: On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 11:34, Craig White wrote: I am functioning with previous WinNT4 PDC unchanged after net rpc vampire operation with the exception that netlogon service has been disabled. Has been working - I cannot use the UserManager etc. tools from this machine though. Because Exchange 5.5 also lives on this box, we are concerned that we will break Exchange if we disable the netlogon service. But it's good to know that someone else is suffering through this successfully! --- I'll bet you $1 that this works If that works then it should be possible to run the NT4 (ex: BDC demoted using the Upromote tool) as a domain member server of a Samba-3 domain. - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] alloc_sub_basic: NULL source string!
Starting three days ago I have found over 4,000 of these error messages in my messages log. Mar 5 15:49:48 fs3 smbd[13785]: alloc_sub_basic: NULL source string! This should not happen Nothing has been changed on the samba config in over a week and that change was about the spin lock time setting. The server is RedHat ES 3 running Samba 3.0.2. The client machines are a mix of Win98 and WinXP Pro on a domain with Samba as the PDC. The only effect I have seen on client machines is that one WinXP Pro box once took several minutes to log in and load it's roaming profile from the server. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] alloc_sub_basic: NULL source string!
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:52:09PM -0600, Jeff Umbach wrote: Starting three days ago I have found over 4,000 of these error messages in my messages log. Mar 5 15:49:48 fs3 smbd[13785]: alloc_sub_basic: NULL source string! This should not happen Nothing has been changed on the samba config in over a week and that change was about the spin lock time setting. The server is RedHat ES 3 running Samba 3.0.2. The client machines are a mix of Win98 and WinXP Pro on a domain with Samba as the PDC. Any chance you could add a smb_panic call in this case so we can track down the cause ? Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: alloc_sub_basic: NULL source string!
Could you tell me or point me to an article that says how to implement that? I didn't find anything on a search that specifically said how to do it. Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:52:09PM -0600, Jeff Umbach wrote: Starting three days ago I have found over 4,000 of these error messages in my messages log. Mar 5 15:49:48 fs3 smbd[13785]: alloc_sub_basic: NULL source string! This should not happen Nothing has been changed on the samba config in over a week and that change was about the spin lock time setting. The server is RedHat ES 3 running Samba 3.0.2. The client machines are a mix of Win98 and WinXP Pro on a domain with Samba as the PDC. Any chance you could add a smb_panic call in this case so we can track down the cause ? Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Printing and share problems
I'm posting my smb.conf file... Hi everyone. I have installed samba 3.0.2 on slackware 9.0. I have a pentium iv 1.7 GHz with 256 MB of RAM and a harddrive of 40 GB. I'm supporting 32 machines so far. This is the thing. Most of the times computers loose connection or access to printers that were working fine. The same thing happens with share folders among computers. Does anyone have an answer to this issue that's killing me.. Best regards, Daniel [global] netbios name = enterprise workgroup = CASINO server string = CasinoCorp PDC passdb backend = smbpasswd encrypt passwords = Yes log file = /var/log/samba.log max log size = 100 ;logon script = %U.bat logon script = logon path = logon drive = logon home = domain logons = Yes os level = 65 preferred master = yes local master = Yes domain master = Yes security = user remote announce = 192.168.100.255/SIMPLE \ 192.168.1.255/SIMPLE lm announce = yes wins support = Yes admin users = @domadmins ;host msdfs = Yes ; name resolve order = wins ;[netlogon] ; path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon ; writeable = No ; browseable = No ;root preexec = /usr/local/samba/bin/ntlogon.py --user=%U --group=%G -dir /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon/ ;root postexec = rm /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon/%U.bat - Original Message - From: Michael Aldrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mjynht [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 10:30 AM Subject: RE: [Samba] Printing and share problems Anything out of the ordinary in your log files when the problem occurs? Can you post a snip of your smb.conf? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of mjynht Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Printing and share problems Hi everyone. I have installed samba 3.0.2 on slackware 9.0. I have a pentium iv 1.7 GHz with 256 MB of RAM and a harddrive of 40 GB. I'm supporting 32 machines so far. This is the thing. Most of the times computers loose connection or access to printers that were working fine. The same thing happens with share folders among computers. Does anyone have an answer to this issue that's killing me.. Best regards, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: alloc_sub_basic: NULL source string!
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:33:28PM -0600, Jeff Umbach wrote: Could you tell me or point me to an article that says how to implement that? I didn't find anything on a search that specifically said how to do it. Ah, I meant doing a source code change I can send you a brief patch for that if you are able to recompile. This will cause smbd to panic (core dump) on this problem. You can then attach to it with gdb and get more information. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Re: alloc_sub_basic: NULL source string!
Unfortunately that is not possible on this server, it is a live server that a restaraunt's point of sale system is running on, so I can't just go recompiling the samba. Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:33:28PM -0600, Jeff Umbach wrote: Could you tell me or point me to an article that says how to implement that? I didn't find anything on a search that specifically said how to do it. Ah, I meant doing a source code change I can send you a brief patch for that if you are able to recompile. This will cause smbd to panic (core dump) on this problem. You can then attach to it with gdb and get more information. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Printing and share problems
I have included the samba log file now... Please somebody help [2004/03/05 18:30:28, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_netsec_process(1371) failed to decode PDU [2004/03/05 18:30:28, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_request_pdu(605) process_request_pdu: failed to do schannel processing. [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_netsec_process(1371) failed to decode PDU [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_request_pdu(605) process_request_pdu: failed to do schannel processing. [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:build_sam_account(1183) build_sam_account: smbpasswd database is corrupt! username casino6$ with uid 1026 is not in unix passwd database! [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:build_sam_account(1183) build_sam_account: smbpasswd database is corrupt! username casino6$ with uid 1026 is not in unix passwd database! [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:unmarshall_rpc_header(473) [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:build_sam_account(1183) build_sam_account: smbpasswd database is corrupt! username casino6$ with uid 1026 is not in unix passwd database! unmarshall_rpc_header: FIRST flag not set in first PDU ! [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_request(1481) api_pipe_request: No rpc function table associated with context [0] on pipe [NETLOGON] [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_netsec_process(1371) failed to decode PDU [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_request_pdu(605) process_request_pdu: failed to do schannel processing. [2004/03/05 18:38:20, 1] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:ntlmssp_server_auth(550) ntlmssp_server_auth: failed to parse NTLMSSP: [2004/03/05 18:38:20, 1] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:ntlmssp_server_auth(574) ntlmssp_server_auth: failed to parse NTLMSSP: [2004/03/05 18:38:45, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_netsec_process(1371) failed to decode PDU [2004/03/05 18:38:45, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_request_pdu(605) process_request_pdu: failed to do schannel processing. [2004/03/05 18:47:58, 1] libsmb/clispnego.c:parse_negTokenTarg(251) Failed to parse negTokenTarg at offset 80 - Original Message - From: Michael Aldrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mjynht [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 10:30 AM Subject: RE: [Samba] Printing and share problems Anything out of the ordinary in your log files when the problem occurs? Can you post a snip of your smb.conf? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of mjynht Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Printing and share problems Hi everyone. I have installed samba 3.0.2 on slackware 9.0. I have a pentium iv 1.7 GHz with 256 MB of RAM and a harddrive of 40 GB. I'm supporting 32 machines so far. This is the thing. Most of the times computers loose connection or access to printers that were working fine. The same thing happens with share folders among computers. Does anyone have an answer to this issue that's killing me.. Best regards, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Re: alloc_sub_basic: NULL source string!
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:49:01PM -0600, Jeff Umbach wrote: Unfortunately that is not possible on this server, it is a live server that a restaraunt's point of sale system is running on, so I can't just go recompiling the samba. Is it reproducible on a non-live server we can do experiments on ? Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba + Win2k
Quoting Craig White On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 12:34, John H Terpstra wrote: On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Guylerme Velasco wrote: How can i get a trust relationship betwen Samba Domain and Win2k ? I´ve tried many ways like, change win2k register, changig some security directives, etc. The win2k is added at Samba Domain like this useradd -g MYGROUP -d /dev/null -s /bin/false WIN2k$ smbpasswd -a -m WIN2K$ FWIW.^ NO DOLLAR SIGN when adding a machine to the smbpasswd file! Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Printing and share problems
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, mjynht wrote: I have included the samba log file now... Please somebody help [2004/03/05 18:30:28, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_netsec_process(1371) failed to decode PDU [2004/03/05 18:30:28, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_request_pdu(605) process_request_pdu: failed to do schannel processing. [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_netsec_process(1371) failed to decode PDU [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_request_pdu(605) process_request_pdu: failed to do schannel processing. [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:build_sam_account(1183) build_sam_account: smbpasswd database is corrupt! username casino6$ with uid 1026 is not in unix passwd database! ^^ This tells you that your machines have account entries in the smbpasswd file but not in your /etc/passwd file. Now that can mean only one thing - You did not create the machine accounts on this machine, or someone deleted the POSIX (UNIX system account) entries from /etc/passwd. Simple solution: Add the missing accounts to /etc/passwd. That is the first thing that must be fixed. - John T. [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:build_sam_account(1183) build_sam_account: smbpasswd database is corrupt! username casino6$ with uid 1026 is not in unix passwd database! [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:unmarshall_rpc_header(473) [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:build_sam_account(1183) build_sam_account: smbpasswd database is corrupt! username casino6$ with uid 1026 is not in unix passwd database! unmarshall_rpc_header: FIRST flag not set in first PDU ! [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_request(1481) api_pipe_request: No rpc function table associated with context [0] on pipe [NETLOGON] [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_netsec_process(1371) failed to decode PDU [2004/03/05 18:36:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_request_pdu(605) process_request_pdu: failed to do schannel processing. [2004/03/05 18:38:20, 1] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:ntlmssp_server_auth(550) ntlmssp_server_auth: failed to parse NTLMSSP: [2004/03/05 18:38:20, 1] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:ntlmssp_server_auth(574) ntlmssp_server_auth: failed to parse NTLMSSP: [2004/03/05 18:38:45, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_netsec_process(1371) failed to decode PDU [2004/03/05 18:38:45, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_request_pdu(605) process_request_pdu: failed to do schannel processing. [2004/03/05 18:47:58, 1] libsmb/clispnego.c:parse_negTokenTarg(251) Failed to parse negTokenTarg at offset 80 - Original Message - From: Michael Aldrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mjynht [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 10:30 AM Subject: RE: [Samba] Printing and share problems Anything out of the ordinary in your log files when the problem occurs? Can you post a snip of your smb.conf? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of mjynht Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Printing and share problems Hi everyone. I have installed samba 3.0.2 on slackware 9.0. I have a pentium iv 1.7 GHz with 256 MB of RAM and a harddrive of 40 GB. I'm supporting 32 machines so far. This is the thing. Most of the times computers loose connection or access to printers that were working fine. The same thing happens with share folders among computers. Does anyone have an answer to this issue that's killing me.. Best regards, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Re: alloc_sub_basic: NULL source string!
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 15:47, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:49:01PM -0600, Jeff Umbach wrote: Unfortunately that is not possible on this server, it is a live server that a restaraunt's point of sale system is running on, so I can't just go recompiling the samba. Is it reproducible on a non-live server we can do experiments on ? Jeremy. oops - meant to send to list... as an fyi - I am running AS 3 / samba upgraded to via up2date this week... # rpm -qa|grep samba samba-3.0.2-6.3E redhat-config-samba-1.0.16-1 samba-common-3.0.2-6.3E samba-client-3.0.2-6.3E I'm not experiencing that problem. In fact, the upgrade from 3.0.0-14.3E (I think it was) to current has quieted down the logs considerably. Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] upgrade samba-2.2.8 to samba-3.0.2a (umlauts)
On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 01:39, Götz Reinicke wrote: Hi, we run a samba 2.2.8 server and like to migrate to a faster, new server running samba 3.0.2a. I thought to copy all files from the old to the new one mounting the new shares by nfs. For a test I copied some files using scp. A problem concernes the german umlauts: on the old server they aren't displayed if I ls the files while browsing the share works fine. If I copy the files to the new share, the files are visible in a terminal by e.g. ls, but not visible on the share mounted by my client :-( I'm using the default settings for character coding or the charset options. Any ideas how to solve my problem? Is ther a (easy) workaround? You should configure your system locale for UTF8, and then run a program such as convmv to convert all your filenames from your current codepage into UTF8. or set your 'unix charset', but it really is best simply to use UTF8. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: getpwnam() fails! (with working nss_ldap setup)
On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 06:07, M. Vancl wrote: I have the same experience. IMHO problem is in access rights to password attributes on ldap (slapd). I doubt that. Recomended access to userPassword for anonymous is only auth (it's right policy). Recommended configuration of nss_ldap is to use anonymous bind for non-root processes (and it is also right policy). Then when getpwnam() is called by unprivileged process and nss_ldap try to read attribute userPassword among others from posixAccount, this must be unsuccessfull attempt (and it is right but wrong to me). What to do ? I think, it is mistake in nss_ldap behaviour. It must omit userPassword attribute from readed attributes when called by nonprivileged process. My solution is simple, but wrong - weaken of access restrictions to password attribute or bind to ldap as manager for all users. This is indeed the wrong solution, and unless your nss_ldap is much buggier than the one used at every other site, I don't think this is the issue. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] DNS proxy is broken in 3.0.2a?
On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 04:04, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: - Original Message - From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dmitry Melekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 6:00 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] DNS proxy is broken in 3.0.2a? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dmitry Melekhov wrote: | Today I upgraded 2.2.8a to 3.0.2a and now samba doesn't | work as dns proxy. Known issue currently: ~ https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607 Thank you! As I see this bug is known for a long time :-( But, if wins replication is still not supported, is there any way to change wins info without nmbd restart? We run samba in large enough network ( we are oil company ;-) ), and we use dns proxy as wins repication replacement... It seems to work for me. (Just tested it on current CVS). Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3.0.2a + Win2K clients: unreliable share access
After upgrading from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2a, accessing a shared folder has become unreliable: after being able to access my shares for some time I get an error message No domain contoller was available (actually, I'm paraphrasing that one, I unfortunately did not record it verbatim). Host linux log contains the following error message for each access: Mar 5 20:07:08 sharesmb01 smbd[4691]: [2004/03/05 20:07:08, 0] auth/auth_winbind.c: check_winbind_security(122) Mar 5 20:07:08 sharesmb01 smbd[4691]: check_winbind_security: ERROR! my_private_data == NULL! Googling the error message just led me to the source file for auth_winbind.c Any ideas for where I might try to find more info troubleshooting this? From smb.conf (machine, domain and user names altered): # Global parameters [global] workgroup = domain01 server string = sharesmb01 (Samba server) security = DOMAIN passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* client lanman auth = No client plaintext auth = No log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 min protocol = NT1 socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_THROUGHPUT SO_SNDBUF=32768 SO_RCVBUF=32768 dns proxy = No wins server = 172.16.10.16 ldap ssl = no idmap uid = 1-2 idmap gid = 1-2 template homedir = /mnt/k/users/%U template shell = /bin/bash winbind use default domain = Yes printing = cups [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No [SASFiles] comment = SMB-shared SAS files path = /home/SASFiles invalid users = +nobody force user = SomeUser force group = +Domain Users read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 hosts allow = 127., 172.16.10. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] What setting determines filename character mapping?
Hi, I'm running samba 3.0.0-15 and have noticed that when users save some files the filenames get transposed. This is usually when they use special characters like the '£' (transposed to '#'). Looking at my smb.conf I found the following settings: # testparm -v | grep -e char -e code dos charset = CP850 unix charset = UTF-8 display charset = LOCALE unicode = Yes mangling char = ~ After consulting the documentation, I'm still not sure what the problem is. Samba 3 talks UTF on the wire and all the clients are Win XP (bar one W95 machine from which no user writes to the samba server). From what I read in the manual I gather that Win XP also talks UTF on the wire. What setting does the actual character mapping for writing the filenames on the samba server? Any help would be appreciated. Regards, Tom __--__-- There is no TRUTH. There is no REALITY. There is no CONSISTENCY. There are no ABSOLUTE STATEMENTS. I'm very probably wrong. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] ld and libsmbclient
Hello, I am having some difficulty making ld resolve the functions in the libsmbclient.so when linking. I am using samba 3.0.2a and the shared library is being built ok. There must be something wrong with the shared library installation. Could somebody please walk me through all of the steps necessary for getting the library installed correctly. The make install only copied the libsmbclient.so. I have tried several different versions of samba, all with the same result so I must be missing something. Thanks, -Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem with stale smdb processes when users log out
I'm running Samba 3.0.0-15 (default install) on a Fedora FC1 machine.
I've attached the smb.conf file below. The Samba server is acting as a
WINS server on our testlab network, but is not a PDC, nor is it joined
into a domain. Users authenticate by using a username/password that is
local to the Samba server.
The problem I'm seeing is that when a user has been connected to the
Samba server and then logs out of their Windows machine, the connections
sometimes persist. As an example:
1. User logs in to a WinXP or Win2K3 machine using a domain account (the
domain PDC is another Windows machine, not the Samba machine).
2. Once in Windows, a connection to the Samba machine is opened via the
Run menu (\\server\share). The connections ('IPC$' and 'sharename' can
be seen via smbstatus and 'net use').
3. User logs out of the Windows machine without explicitly disconnecting
from the Samba server.
4. Connections on the Samba server can sill be seen with smbstatus.
4. User logs in to the same Windows machine, this time with a local
machine account (such as localMachine\Administrator).
5. User tries to connect to the Samba server using the Run menu, and
gets an error saying that the password is invalid. Checking with 'net
use' shows that a connection to the Samba server already exists.
6. Deleting the connection ('net use \\server\share /delete') sometimes
restores functionality, but not consistently.
Any ideas? Thanks.
-Pete
-
[global]
max log size = 50
guest ok = yes
username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
server string = QA Lab Server
load printers = yes
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
workgroup = PULSAR
local master = no
wins support = yes
printer name = HPLJ4P
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
printcap name = /etc/printcap
dns proxy = no
password server = None
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = no
printable = yes
guest ok = yes
[data]
comment = Antares Data
path = /mnt/data
writeable = yes
hide dot files = yes
force group = users
; force create = 0775
force directory mode = 6775
inherit permissions = yes
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] 3.0.3pre1 byte range lock leak?
I'm having a problem involving Outlook and .pst files and a lock that is getting stuck I believe. Once Outlook crashes in the fashion it does, it is unable to reopen the file, claiming it is already in use. Explorer also does not let me access the file. Rebooting the workstation does not fix it. smbstatus does not show the lock, however hwen I show byte range locks, there is one, from a PID that doesn't exist. I assume this is the problem lock. The smbd that owned the lock died when the client rebooted/reconnected. I am unable to fix this problem. I think that samba at least needs a smblocks utility to force locks to be released, and manipulate the lock db (is there such a thing) in order to fix solutions like these. When it happens a user on the network is unable to access their email until samba is restarted, which cannot be done during normal working hours... it's becoming a big problem. (does it already have such a utility?) I am using 3.0.3pre1, Debian Woody. Linux 2.4.22. Thanks. Jerry Haltom signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] DNS proxy is broken in 3.0.2a?
- Original Message - From: Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dmitry Melekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 4:25 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] DNS proxy is broken in 3.0.2a? It seems to work for me. (Just tested it on current CVS). Hello! Now I'm shure that this is not samba problem. I found that I can't find some host with nslookup too on wins server. I changed domains order in search in resolv.conf and now all works. nmblookup -R -U 192.168.22.220 center querying center on 192.168.22.220 192.168.22.224 center00 Something is wrong in bind 9.1.3... Sorry for wasting your time. :-( -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] 3.0.3pre1 byte range lock leak?
quote I'm having a problem involving Outlook and .pst files and a lock that is getting stuck I believe. Once Outlook crashes in the fashion it does, it is unable to reopen the file, claiming it is already in use. Explorer also does not let me access the file. Rebooting the workstation does not fix it. smbstatus does not show the lock, however hwen I show byte range locks, there is one, from a PID that doesn't exist. I assume this is the problem lock. /quote Hello! We had completely the same problem with samba 3.0.0, so we downgraded it back to 2.2.8. I wrote about this problem, but nobody else said that they have such problem... Yesterday I installed 3.0.2a in fileserver. Looks like I'll have to downgrade it again, if problem is still exists :-( Unfortunately, I can't reproduce this problem on test server.. btw, we run SLES8. quote I think that samba at least needs a smblocks utility to force locks to be released /quote I think this is good idea. And, I need the same tool for WINS database too ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] citrix stores addition information into SAM on pdc
quote hi, we want to replace our nt4 pdc/bdc with samba and we use windows nt4 terminal servers with citrix in our environment. as far as i know, we will get a problem here. (extensiver reading of the mailing list led me to this conclusion) regarding: http://ma.ph-freiburg.de/tng/tng-users/2001-05/msg00224.html /quote http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2004-February/034577.html -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] citrix stores addition information into SAM on pdc
hi, we want to replace our nt4 pdc/bdc with samba and we use windows nt4 terminal servers with citrix in our environment. as far as i know, we will get a problem here. (extensiver reading of the mailing list led me to this conclusion) regarding: http://ma.ph-freiburg.de/tng/tng-users/2001-05/msg00224.html Terminal Server has its own User Manager (which has an extra button - Config on the User Properties dialog box) which read/writes additional information in the SAM that is not used by standard NT4 servers. This extra information relates to the users configuration in the terminal server environment. Such things as - Allow Logon to Terminal Server Timeout settings for connection, disconnection idle. Action to take on broken or timd-out connections Whether shadowing is enabled Whether to connect client printers and drives etc. I don't think that Samba (in any of its incarnations) support this extended SAM functionality, so you'll need to use Windows NT Servers as your NT domain controllers. if this has not already been adressed (has it?) we sure get problems with those citrix settings. we use the session shadowing feature and after migrating to samba, i`m somewhat sure things will mess up, because the information wether shadowing is enabled or not cannot be stored on samba pdc. citrix is very popular and citrix serverfarms usually NEED a domaincontroller by design - so i wonder that this hasn`t already been adressed. can someone give me information on this and confirm that this still IS an issue ? if someone is willing to resolve this issue please feel free to contact me. i can probably supply necessary information (network tcpdumpsregistry access logsdoing testingwhatever) please contact me via mail, because i`m not subscribed to this list. regards roland ps: while writing this mail i did some further search in the ML archive, so i`m happy to see, that i`m not alone :) http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba-technicalm=107787679914877w=2 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
CVS update: samba
Date: Fri Mar 5 15:37:08 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv27495 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 WHATSNEW.txt Log Message: bring WHATSNEW back up to date Revisions: WHATSNEW.txt1.52.2.73 = 1.52.2.74 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/WHATSNEW.txt.diff?r1=1.52.2.73r2=1.52.2.74
CVS update: samba/source/utils
Date: Fri Mar 5 17:17:31 2004 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/utils In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13984/utils Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 smbget.c Log Message: Add -O (for writing downloaded files to standard out) based on patch by Bas van Sisseren [EMAIL PROTECTED] Revisions: smbget.c1.1.2.2 = 1.1.2.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/utils/smbget.c.diff?r1=1.1.2.2r2=1.1.2.3
CVS update: samba/source/utils
Date: Fri Mar 5 17:21:45 2004 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/utils In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14857 Modified Files: smbget.c Log Message: Add -O (write downloaded files to stdout), based on patch from Bas van Sisseren [EMAIL PROTECTED] Revisions: smbget.c1.3 = 1.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/utils/smbget.c.diff?r1=1.3r2=1.4
CVS update: samba/source/printing
Date: Fri Mar 5 17:39:38 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/printing In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17589/printing Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 printing.c Log Message: fix compiler warning Revisions: printing.c 1.139.2.45 = 1.139.2.46 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/printing/printing.c.diff?r1=1.139.2.45r2=1.139.2.46
CVS update: samba/source/printing
Date: Fri Mar 5 17:39:59 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/printing In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17629/printing Modified Files: printing.c Log Message: fix compiler warning Revisions: printing.c 1.203 = 1.204 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/printing/printing.c.diff?r1=1.203r2=1.204
CVS update: samba-docs/docbook/manpages
Date: Fri Mar 5 18:10:04 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba-docs/docbook/manpages In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv23897/docbook/manpages Modified Files: winbindd.8.xml Log Message: BUG 565: winbindd's host lookup functionality is only exported via the IRIX nss lib Revisions: winbindd.8.xml 1.4 = 1.5 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba-docs/docbook/manpages/winbindd.8.xml.diff?r1=1.4r2=1.5
CVS update: samba/source/web
Date: Fri Mar 5 18:37:01 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/web In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29818/web Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 statuspage.c Log Message: BUG 488: fix the 'show client in col 1' button and corrctely enumerate active connections Revisions: statuspage.c1.29.2.8 = 1.29.2.9 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/web/statuspage.c.diff?r1=1.29.2.8r2=1.29.2.9
CVS update: samba/source/web
Date: Fri Mar 5 18:37:32 2004 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/web In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29915/web Modified Files: statuspage.c Log Message: BUG 488: fix the 'show client in col 1' button and corrctely enumerate active connections Revisions: statuspage.c1.37 = 1.38 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/web/statuspage.c.diff?r1=1.37r2=1.38
CVS update: samba/source/smbd
Date: Fri Mar 5 22:32:43 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/smbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8946/smbd Modified Files: filename.c service.c trans2.c vfs.c Log Message: Several mb tidyups - getting ready to address the XXX_sub function. Jeremy. Revisions: filename.c 1.63 = 1.64 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/filename.c.diff?r1=1.63r2=1.64 service.c 1.130 = 1.131 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/service.c.diff?r1=1.130r2=1.131 trans2.c1.263 = 1.264 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/trans2.c.diff?r1=1.263r2=1.264 vfs.c 1.85 = 1.86 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/vfs.c.diff?r1=1.85r2=1.86
CVS update: samba/source/smbd
Date: Fri Mar 5 22:32:45 2004 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/smbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8954/smbd Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 filename.c service.c trans2.c vfs.c Log Message: Several mb tidyups - getting ready to address the XXX_sub function. Jeremy. Revisions: filename.c 1.48.2.14 = 1.48.2.15 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/filename.c.diff?r1=1.48.2.14r2=1.48.2.15 service.c 1.85.2.32 = 1.85.2.33 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/service.c.diff?r1=1.85.2.32r2=1.85.2.33 trans2.c1.217.2.64 = 1.217.2.65 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/trans2.c.diff?r1=1.217.2.64r2=1.217.2.65 vfs.c 1.57.2.24 = 1.57.2.25 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/vfs.c.diff?r1=1.57.2.24r2=1.57.2.25
