-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:45:22PM +0200, Joerg Pulz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Ok, all the changes here are just to reduce the size of
Nyilvntartsunk szerint n a Hihetetlen Egypercesre jelentkezett.
Ha valban tag kvn lenni, krem kldje vissza vltozatlan formban ezt a levelet a
feladnak, ehhez kattintson bngsz#337;je Reply/Vlasz gombjra.
Tagsgt 1 hten bell trljk, ha nem er#337;sti meg a jelentekezst.
dvzlettel:
Egypercesek
--
dvzljk az Egyperces olvasinak tborban!
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi,
I've just migrated NT domain to samba+ldap - works great, but there is one
thing I don't quite understand:
What is the reason to have a 'computer account' on host UNIX serving samba?
I know, that NT PDC needs ID+password for each computer within its domain.
But samba TDB or LDAP pwdb
Hi everyone !
I've some questions about the documentation in the samba how-to :
Page 76, 6.4.3.1 Possible errors :
It is said :
... try net use * \\server\share. You should be logged in with Kerberos
without needing to know a password. If it fails ... Does it have an
encryption type of
Have a look at this
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;327462
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:45:22PM +0200, Joerg Pulz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Ok, all the changes here are just to reduce the size of string
used from an unstring to an nstring. Unfortunately this cannot
Version: 3.0.2a-1 (both in distributed package and in package rebuilt on my
machine)
OS: Debian testing
Environment: Windows 2000 Active Directory
I am trying to setup winbind on my machine as described in the Samba HOWTO
collection. I have edited nsswitch.conf and smb.conf as instructed and my
Hi
thanks for the suggestions, but it did not help.. and I think the error
might be a combination of dhcp and smb config... .
While trying to open the windows network places sometimes I can see the
other pcs, sometimes not... if I see the machines (including the server) I
can not access them
Hello,
I have configfured in /etc/samba/smusers:
root = administrator
and in /etc/group:
root:x:0:root,administrator
Further I have mapped the groups:
Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) - root
Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-3965442966-3812898117-3611004146-512) - root
But my Windows XP Clients won't the
Hi,
As requested, here are the versions:
samba-3.0.2-7.FC1
samba-common-3.0.2-7.FC1
samba-client-3.0.2-7.FC1
krb5-server-1.3.1-6
krb5-libs-1.3.1-6
krb5-workstation-1.3.1-6
pam_krb5-2.0.5-1
It's all FC1 standard.
Thank you.
JB
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 16:46, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, May
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jeremy,
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 08:41:35AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote:
Hi,
I'm running 3.0.4 and have had several reports from users both using Office
and Lotus where the application tells them that the file is already
Greg Adams wrote:
I've been reading some documentation and can't find an answer to my
question...
I work in an environment where we have a bunch of Solaris 2.8 servers and
a bunch of developers using Windows 2000 and XP desktops. We support a
client using a Windows 2000 Server ADS PDC, and they
Am Montag, 24. Mai 2004 15:06 schrieb Gerald (Jerry) Carter:
Timo Veith wrote:
| Hi,
|
| allow me another question. Is it planned or already
| implemented to support gssapi with mount.cifs?
It is planned according to what I understand from Steve French.
Just not done yet.
And what about
Hello,
I am using Samba 2.2.8a with 2.6.6 CIFS Linux clients and I've got
problems with symbolic links : I can't make them point outside the share.
I understand that it is a security feature if the server resolves the
link. But, in my case, I'd like Samba to serve link files *as is*, so
that
OK,
Now, if you set you set the following, do you still have a problem browsing?
os level = 10
wins support = no
You will have to restart samba after the change, you may also have to
restart all of the workstations. This should force that samba server to
not be the master browser on the
Hi List,
Have just upgraded from 2.2.7 to 3.0.4 and have a problem with two shares
that refuse to show.
The other 6 shares appear fine.
smb.conf is below - it's an old file from 2.0.x ;)
There is a Samba PDC on the network too - 192.168.10.246 this does WINS etc,
runs 3.0.1
I have tried;
HI,
could you please tell me if you stock womens heightening shoes?
Could you send me your website or photos and prices.
Thanks,
samantha
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
After installing 3.0.4 on suse, I had the same problem again, I figured
it out this time! nscd was still running... stop nscd (on suse
/etc/init.d/nscd stop) and it works fine!
Sorry for the hassle!
Hamish wrote:
Hi Jerry
Thanks for your patience, I have tried installing 3.0.3 again and it
has
Hi
I use Mandrake Linux 10.0 and I recently upgraded from Samba 2.2.8 to
Samba 3.0.2a.
The Samba box is in a network that I do not control. The Win clients have
nothing set in their network properties: no DNS server, no WINS server.
Question 1: is it true that they get their name resolution
Hello
I have to strange problems since we changed from samba 3.0.2a to 3.0.4.
The first one is, everytime I enter SWAT the entry in smb.conf printcap
name changes from /etc/printcap to lpstat even when i switch back
to default in SWAT (wich is /etc/printcap ) i get the entry lpstat in
my
hi list,
Solved my own problem with:
[profiles]
nt acl support = Yes
regards,
-- RNuno
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Ricardo Nuno
Sent: quarta-feira, 26 de Maio de 2004 13:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Samba 3 and LDAP -
Hello,
I have problems with my Samba servers.
The PDC in the Windows domain is a NT4 and has the patch KB828741 installed
on it.
1st server : HP-UX 10.20 with Samba 2.2.8a
workgroup = FR-MON
netbios name = TIMIX
security = domain
encrypt passwords =
Hi Jim
Sorry for inserting me in the discussion, but I have the same problem here
and I tryed to set
os level = 10
wins support = no
and nothing changes...
I tryed to disable the wins support in win98 clients... do not work too..
I don't have any WinNT/XP/2k in my network, just win98
I sent this yesterday, but it didn't seem to make it to the list - sorry
if its a dup...
Hello,
I have been using Red Hat 8.0 with SAMBA for a while (but I am by no
means an expert at either) without issue. Anyway I just migrated my
system to SuSe 9.0. SAMBA appears to be setup properly as I
On 18 May 2004 at 10:28, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
please see the patch attached to bug 1319 (as of yesterday) and
try it out. The bug is actually an interaction between
'force user' adn 'write list'
Sorry for the late answer.
Can you tell me how to apply this patch (or tell me where I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex de Vaal wrote:
|
| please see the patch attached to bug 1319 (as
| of yesterday) and try it out. The bug is actually
| an interaction between 'force user' adn 'write list'
|
| Sorry for the late answer.
|
| Can you tell me how to apply this patch
Hello
Using Samba 2.2.8a on a Redhat 7.2 box
I set up a PDF generator relying on Samba and a shell script to create
the output.
This works fine but I have a further trouble that I am stumped by. The
files cannot be viewed from within a Citrix session (the point of the
entire exercise) unless
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 10:42:27AM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:45:22PM +0200, Joerg Pulz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Ok, all the changes here are just to reduce the
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:24:16PM +0200, ALBANI damiano wrote:
Hello,
I am using Samba 2.2.8a with 2.6.6 CIFS Linux clients and I've got
problems with symbolic links : I can't make them point outside the share.
I understand that it is a security feature if the server resolves the
link.
There are files in these sub-directories (which I can see when I am
logged into the machine). But when I connect to the share from a
Windows XP Pro machine the files in the main directory appear and are
accessable, but when I click to open the sub-directories they come up
empty. The other
If your getting kinit problems with net ads join (don't bother with
testjoin-it will error out no matter), do the following:
1. Change an administrators password, especially if you upgraded from
NT 4.
2. Create a krb5.conf file int /etc that looks like this:
logging]
default =
Good morning,
How do I find out what options where built in to the rpm
binary of Samba 3.0.4?
I'm looking for features;
msdfs
ads
automount
quotas
acl-support
Bri-
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Jeremy,
I have the protocol traces but they are about 44MB and 70MB. Is there a
way I can send them to you? As for the testing, we are running Windows
2003 advanced server with no service packs. From the 2003 client, we
map a drive to the server (Samba or W2003). Then from that drive we
have
run smbd -b to get the build options
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning,
How do I find out what options where built in to the rpm
binary of Samba 3.0.4?
I'm looking for features;
msdfs
ads
automount
quotas
acl-support
Bri-
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:14:48PM -0400, Wayne R. Prior wrote:
I've searched, but can't find any information
concerning unix and windows file naming conventions.
We want to use SAMBA, but are concerned about
our users being able to work with files
named Boy, BOY, bOY, etc...
I'm not sure what the configurations of the Primary and Backup servers
should be to enable them to operate as a domain across a WAN. The original
server has been running for some time as the master server, but now I am
adding a second (backup) server at the remote site. The global section of
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:03:29PM +0100, Jorge Manta Bulhoes wrote:
Hi,
As requested, here are the versions:
samba-3.0.2-7.FC1
samba-common-3.0.2-7.FC1
samba-client-3.0.2-7.FC1
krb5-server-1.3.1-6
krb5-libs-1.3.1-6
krb5-workstation-1.3.1-6
pam_krb5-2.0.5-1
It's all FC1 standard.
Hi,
I've searched for lots of messages similar to this, but none as detailed
as this, and I haven't seen an answer that helps me.
I have a Win 2000 machine that has some file shares on it. These shares
are international; files and directories have characters from many
languages. The system
Buchan, I'm sending this to the samba list also. I'm hoping someone can
pick out my config error - if that is what my problem is...
On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 11:16, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Jordan wrote:
| Is this package OK to use? I started
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rafal Pietrak wrote:
| What is the reason to have a 'computer account' on host UNIX serving
samba?
|
| I know, that NT PDC needs ID+password for each computer within its domain.
| But samba TDB or LDAP pwdb backend look quite sufficient. I don't see a
We've been using samba for in house domain serving for a small network of XP
machines. We have an HP 932c shared via samba 2.2.8a on a Linux box. We
loaded the drivers that come with windows on the print$ share for automatic
installation. In samba, the print command is lpr-cups -P %p -o raw
Hello,
We are using Samba to connect our ClearCase server to the Windows environment. Our
original configuration was one server hosting all our VOBs and Views. We have Samba
configured to allow mapping of shares to our ClearCase Windows Clients. Everything was
working fine. Now we have set up a
On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 13:59, Sharpe, Annik A wrote:
Hello,
We are using Samba to connect our ClearCase server to the Windows environment. Our
original configuration was one server hosting all our VOBs and Views. We have Samba
configured to allow mapping of shares to our ClearCase Windows
Hi,
I would like to know if it is possible to share lock between two network
dispatched samba server.
ex: we have a cname named samba, which dispatch connection on samba01
and samba02. But if a user open a Microsoft Word file on samba01, I
don't want someone connected on samba02 to be able to
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 04:59:05PM -0400, Sharpe, Annik A wrote:
April == Sharpe, Annik A [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
April Hello, We are using Samba to connect our ClearCase server
April to the Windows environment. Our original configuration was
April one server hosting all our VOBs
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 09:00:18PM -0400, Yannick Bergeron wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if it is possible to share lock between two network
dispatched samba server.
ex: we have a cname named samba, which dispatch connection on samba01
and samba02. But if a user open a Microsoft Word
Author: deryck
Date: 2004-05-28 06:01:48 + (Fri, 28 May 2004)
New Revision: 82
Added:
trunk/support/slovakia.html
Modified:
trunk/support/countries.html
trunk/support/germany.html
trunk/support/greece.html
trunk/support/italy.html
trunk/support/pakistan.html
Author: deryck
Date: 2004-05-28 06:17:29 + (Fri, 28 May 2004)
New Revision: 83
Modified:
trunk/support/germany.html
trunk/support/italy.html
Log:
Correcting format problems in last update.
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=samba-webpath=/rev=83nolog=1
Author: abartlet
Date: 2004-05-28 08:57:00 + (Fri, 28 May 2004)
New Revision: 936
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/passdb/lookup_sid.c
Log:
Fix a rather weird error that crippled my site, when we upgraded to
Samba 3.0.4.
If we fail a query for the members of the 'administrators' group
This seem related to a bug I recently had.
My problem this time was a misconfigured group mapping, but the effect
was that a NULL struct (I think) was passed back as members of the
administrators group.
I think we are getting wrong the way to return we have zero members,
and windows picks up a
Author: tridge
Date: 2004-05-28 13:23:30 + (Fri, 28 May 2004)
New Revision: 937
Added:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/util_secdesc.c
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/include/rpc_secdes.h
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/basic.mk
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/idl/lsa.idl
Author: herb
Date: 2004-05-28 17:57:18 + (Fri, 28 May 2004)
New Revision: 938
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/lib/iconv.c
Log:
on an error save the original errno before calling iconv to reset
the conversion state
WebSVN:
Author: jra
Date: 2004-05-28 18:28:18 + (Fri, 28 May 2004)
New Revision: 939
Modified:
trunk/source/lib/iconv.c
Log:
Patch penguin... merging Herbs change.
Jeremy.
WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=939nolog=1
Author: jra
Date: 2004-05-28 18:29:40 + (Fri, 28 May 2004)
New Revision: 940
Modified:
trunk/source/passdb/lookup_sid.c
Log:
Patch penguin : Merging :
Fix a rather weird error that crippled my site, when we upgraded to
Samba 3.0.4.
Author: jelmer
Date: 2004-05-28 18:55:06 + (Fri, 28 May 2004)
New Revision: 89
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4/entities/global.entities
branches/SAMBA_4/manpages/gregedit.1.xml
branches/SAMBA_4/manpages/ldb.7.xml
branches/SAMBA_4/manpages/ldbadd.1.xml
Author: vlendec
Date: 2004-05-28 19:14:47 + (Fri, 28 May 2004)
New Revision: 941
Modified:
trunk/source/smbd/reply.c
Log:
If using DOS error codes, we need to return ERRDOS/ERRbadpath for chkpth even
if only the last component failed. I'm not sure if all the other cases of
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 07:15:12PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: vlendec
Date: 2004-05-28 19:15:11 + (Fri, 28 May 2004)
New Revision: 942
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/reply.c
Log:
If using DOS error codes, we need to return ERRDOS/ERRbadpath for chkpth even
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 12:18:06PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 07:15:12PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: vlendec
Date: 2004-05-28 19:15:11 + (Fri, 28 May 2004)
New Revision: 942
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/reply.c
Log:
If
Author: jelmer
Date: 2004-05-28 19:44:58 + (Fri, 28 May 2004)
New Revision: 90
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4/manpages/pidl.1.xml
Log:
Syntax format
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=samba-docspath=/rev=90nolog=1
Author: jelmer
Date: 2004-05-28 23:34:57 + (Fri, 28 May 2004)
New Revision: 91
Added:
branches/SAMBA_4/manpages/ldbdel.1.xml
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4/TODO
branches/SAMBA_4/manpages/ldbadd.1.xml
Log:
More Samba-4 manpages... only 10 utilities left to document :-)
WebSVN:
Author: jelmer
Date: 2004-05-29 00:32:57 + (Sat, 29 May 2004)
New Revision: 92
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4/TODO
branches/SAMBA_4/entities/global.entities
branches/SAMBA_4/manpages/gregedit.1.xml
branches/SAMBA_4/manpages/regdiff.1.xml
branches/SAMBA_4/manpages/regpatch.1.xml
62 matches
Mail list logo
