David C. Rankin wrote:
Ok, I think the following patch should fix the issues
you're seeing. It should apply on top of, or in place
of my previous patch - shouldn't matter.
It causes all opens requiring SEC_RIGHT_SYSTEM_SECURITY
to fail as Windows does with NT_STATUS_PRIVILEGE_NOT_HELD,
which
I am out of the office until 11-03-2009.
I will reply to emails when I return.
Note: This is an automated response to your message [Samba] Many Samba
3.3.1 manpages have incorrect version number sent on 10/3/09 4:08:13.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is
Hello All,
Is it possible to come up with auditd rules that can monitor read/write/etc
actions done on samba shares? Can anyone suggest a few recipes? tia
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
I try to join a Samba 3.2 server on RHEL 4 to AD using
net ads join -d 2 -U myacco...@maindom.com
The domain to join the samba server should join to is a subdomain of
MAINDOM.COM, call it SUB1.MAINDOM.COM.
The interesting part of smb.conf is:
[global]
workgroup = SUB1
security = ADS
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:49:26AM -0700, plug bert wrote:
Is it possible to come up with auditd rules that can
monitor read/write/etc actions done on samba shares? Can
anyone suggest a few recipes? tia
Look at the full_audit module.
Volker
pgpEJNU7s6vNd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:22:33AM +, ljb wrote:
dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:50 PM, ljb ljb1...@pobox.com wrote:
Tried to upgrade from Samba-3.2.7 to 3.2.8 using the released patch:
http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/patches/patch-3.2.7-3.2.8.diffs.gz
But
That's exactly what I was looking for -- Thanks!
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:19:49PM -0500, Dale Schroeder wrote:
Mark Adams wrote:
Hi All,
I haven't received a response from anyone on this - Can anyone help?
Is there any way to have samba simply use the current records stored in
I have a share with folders belonging to diferent groups, with
restricted access depending on unix groups.
When a user creates a file inside one of this folders I want it created
with directory group; I think it should be possible using inherit
acl but it don't work; my share configuration is:
Hi Adam,
nscd wasn't running on my machine.
After setting the option ldapsam:trusted = yes smbd doesnt start any longer
I get the following error in /var/log/smbd.log:
[2009/03/09 22:01:31, 0] smbd/server.c:main(1063)
ERROR: failed to setup guest info.
I did add a nobody account group to my
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 22:21 +0100, Arthur Odekerken wrote:
nscd wasn't running on my machine.
After setting the option ldapsam:trusted = yes smbd doesnt start any longer
I get the following error in /var/log/smbd.log:
[2009/03/09 22:01:31, 0] smbd/server.c:main(1063)
ERROR: failed to setup
Adam,
I get this whenever I do
[r...@samba ~]# pdbedit --user=nobody
smbldap_search_domain_info: Searching
for:[((objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=DOMAIN.TLD))]
smbldap_open_connection: connection opened
ldap_connect_system: succesful connection to the LDAP server
Hi All
Im my [homes] share i want to have two access rules. First one is
%D%w%S so that DOMAINdmarkey will only be able to access his own home
directory and nobody elses
But I only want users in the postgrad group to be able to access
their home directory.
How could i implement both rules on
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:41 +0100, Arthur Odekerken wrote:
Adam,
I get this whenever I do
[r...@samba ~]# pdbedit --user=nobody
smbldap_search_domain_info: Searching
for:[((objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=DOMAIN.TLD))]
smbldap_open_connection: connection opened
Hi,
In other word (if I understand), each users (%D%w%S) have access to her
home directory and postgard group must be able to access to all homes
folder ?
If you want this, is preferable to create a other share witn the path of
home directory and put access to postgrad on this share
be
No Sorry,
The only people who i want to give access to their own home directory is
postgrad. but I only want them to access their own home dirctory not anyone
elses(i.e the %D%w%S rule)
Any clearer?
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:55:14 +0100, Stéphane PURNELLE
stephane.purne...@corman.be wrote:
Hi,
ah ok, sorry,
But I don't have the answer for you.
Usually, the homes share is the user home directory and is not a standard
share.
the homes share in smb.conf contain theses parameter (normal config :
[homes]
path = /path/to/home/directory/%U
force user = %U
read only
After setting the option ldapsam:trusted = yes smbd doesnt start any
longer
I get the following error in /var/log/smbd.log:
[2009/03/09 22:01:31, 0] smbd/server.c:main(1063)
ERROR: failed to setup guest info.
Group mapping?
Domain Guests is a required group, along with Domain Users
Im my [homes] share i want to have two access rules. First one is
%D%w%S so that DOMAINdmarkey will only be able to access his own home
directory and nobody elses
But I only want users in the postgrad group to be able to access
their home directory.
That question has already been solved
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 07:23:26AM +0100, Thomas Bork wrote:
David C. Rankin wrote:
Ok, I think the following patch should fix the issues
you're seeing. It should apply on top of, or in place
of my previous patch - shouldn't matter.
It causes all opens requiring SEC_RIGHT_SYSTEM_SECURITY
to
Hi,
Just to be clear, I do not want a Samba PDC or a Windows domain.
I would just like to authenticate against OpenLDAP from a Windows XP
Professional SP3 Client that is not connected to a domain.
Authentication works, even with LDAP groups. The only problem is that Samba
doesn't see my changes
Hi,
I resolved the problem.
I changed my smb.conf as follows:
[global]
netbios name = SAMBA
server string = %h
workgroup = DOMAIN.TLD
security = user
encrypt passwords = true
ldap passwd sync = yes
guest account = nobody
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://zarafa.hasselt.be
ldap admin dn =
If you are referring to http://marc.info/?l=sambam=122692173903872w=2
This doesnt work for me because postgrad isnt the primary group of those
particular users.
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:18:44 +, Miguel Medalha miguelmeda...@sapo.pt
wrote:
Im my [homes] share i want to have two access
Could you provide more information about your configuration.
a homes share with two access, why ?
A idea :
about include parameter, if you edit your smb.conf and put end of the file
the homes shares and the include parameter like :
include = %D%w%S.smb.conf
[homes]
...
valid user= @postgrad
I really think i have explained the situation enough and its not that
complex. I only want the users in the postgrad group to get access to
their home directories via samba but i dont want them to be able to
access anyone elses.
include = %D%w%S.smb.conf wont work, that would obviosly mean id
Hi,
I have one share and two users that belong to the same groups : group1,
group2
I should be able to write files in the same dir since the are user.group
owned.
dir1 = user1.group1
dir2 = user2.group1
Since user1 and user2 belong to the same groups and the mask is 770 user1
should be able to
I need help with this advice.
It's very meaningful to me to learn that a particular subject has
already arisen. However, I don't understand ... search the list.
I've looked all around URL:
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba , and not discovered a
search facility. When you write
I think you are saying you only want the postgrad group to have access
to their home directory share.
Look at the smb.conf entry for valid users.
David Markey wrote:
I really think i have explained the situation enough and its not that
complex. I only want the users in the postgrad group to
No..
I want only postgrad group to have access but I dont want them to access
anyone elses home directory as discussed previously(using the valid users =
%D%w%S).
In other words i need some kind of AND statement.
i.e. valid users = @DOMAIN\postgrads AND %D%w%S
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:04:29
We are running Samba 3.033 / Winbind on RHEL5 x64 that authenticates to our AD
domain. We need to create a few LOCAL service accounts and groups (for Oracle)
however when we try to add the user group accounts, we get the error:
groupadd: group dba exists. This is because we have a domain
Hello,
I am new to Samba. I have not actually set it up yet aside from a test bed.
I'm wanting set up a Samba server in which Windows XP boxes will
authenticating to, as a Domain Controller. Is it possible to set up Samba to
have some profiles that are roaming while having other profiles that are
David,
What about approaching this from another angle? Using posix permissions,
create a special place for the postgrad user directories.
mkdir /home/postgrad
chmod 750 /home/postgrad
chown root:postgrad /home/postgrad
[homes]
path = /home/postgrad/%U
valid users = @postgrad
etc
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 18:10 +, David Markey wrote:
No..
I want only postgrad group to have access but I dont want them to access
anyone elses home directory as discussed previously(using the valid users =
%D%w%S).
In other words i need some kind of AND statement.
i.e. valid users =
We are using a windows server 2003 active directory as our single sign
on server. I have been able to get our RHEL4U6 servers to authenticate
with active directory.
My concern is that the RID mapping to unix uid/gid range (15000-2)
is stored locally on each machine in a tdb database. So far
Would you be able to add this patch to the 3.3.2 release?
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6144
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Oops, nevermind, I see you already replied to my question yesterday.
Thanks :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
setup samba to server roaming profiles, and for specific users turn off
roaming profiles on the XP computer using gpedit.msc, not specifying the
sambaProfilePath in LDAP, or on my computer properties, advanced, users,
change their profile from roaming to local.
Greg Charles wrote:
Hello,
I
HI all :-)
Using debian stable (samba version 2:3.2.5-4 ) often I mount ntfs partition
(using mount.ntfs-3g) of a usb external disk. So I can access from my lan to
this usb disk.
[usb0]
path=/media/usb0
writable = yes
browseable = no
valid users = nick
[...]
when I finish to use this disk and
[%U]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = yes
read only = no
path = %H
valid users = @DOMAIN\postgrad
ea support = yes
store dos attributes = yes
map readonly = no
map archive = no
map system = no
hide
Am Dienstag, 10. März 2009 schrieb Pol Hallen:
HI all :-)
Using debian stable (samba version 2:3.2.5-4 ) often I mount ntfs partition
(using mount.ntfs-3g) of a usb external disk. So I can access from my lan to
this usb disk.
[usb0]
path=/media/usb0
writable = yes
browseable = no
This came up for me again today, I need to create a similar setup on
another machine. Any ideas?
Dan
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 14:47 -0600, Daniel Davidson wrote:
Oops Samba version 3.0.28-0.el4.9
Dan
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 09:39 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at
Dale,
Thanks for the information and the link. We are just now trying to
implement this and we have not implemented this on any production
servers. I need to talk with my security person to see if we
have/planning to have trusted domains. If we do then I will have to go
with the ldap/ADS
chmod g+s dirname
-Original Message-
From: samba-bounces+andrew.masterson=nuvistaenergy@lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-bounces+andrew.masterson=nuvistaenergy@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Lluís Forns
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 5:22 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject:
ksee...@samba.org wrote:
...
Samba-3.2.7 was announced on 2009-01-05, so what is WHATSNEW.txt
from 3.2.7 doing with a 2009-01-28 date?
It seems as something went wrong while creating the patch. I just uploaded
a new patch. Maybe it takes a while untile replication has taken place...
Please
Is this working as designed or a samba bug?
I am trying to chown ownership of a file in a samba share and it
results in an error.
cifstest6:~ # smbclient //cifstest8/smb8 -U root
Enter root's password:
Domain=[CIFSTEST8] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.4.0-GIT-e6a5f11-devel]
smb: \ chown 65534 65534
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Shirish Pargaonkar
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this working as designed or a samba bug?
I am trying to chown ownership of a file in a samba share and it
results in an error.
cifstest6:~ # smbclient //cifstest8/smb8 -U root
Enter root's password:
The branch, master has been updated
via 143b222546f5b6bd6af000426465aa7466ae2ba3 (commit)
from 6f1f9f6d8d3d25ab6ed5467b81f1eed70e962d27 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 7fc8086e11497c96be72859a510f72cb3c4104d5 (commit)
from 143b222546f5b6bd6af000426465aa7466ae2ba3 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via 391a391a8bc57f59af627f676d2a507d46bd0832 (commit)
from 6dc12c482044597af41fb476624642d17e415858 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via 89e340e09fbdc375c0aa85506add525b8ba5dcd0 (commit)
from 391a391a8bc57f59af627f676d2a507d46bd0832 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via 1067eae0ae6e7cef7419cc373b96aa0c2de9bb55 (commit)
from 89e340e09fbdc375c0aa85506add525b8ba5dcd0 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-3-stable has been updated
via a5aa69f9d1a6499e9eea1b4821bdfbc87597a603 (commit)
via 676e0d0caf1aac8eb331589c2c5a4ffb0e83b4f4 (commit)
via cc3237bb192d6f2c7ae9887df28518c011bdac14 (commit)
via f93dfe8659cec3ad5996d8ed6f7f9d6df4b697fb (commit)
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via 4624451b7b78695b3f84e7fff91018ee9df0e589 (commit)
from 1067eae0ae6e7cef7419cc373b96aa0c2de9bb55 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via e47d2091136c4d870bb91b8a84eb9f6fd78eb971 (commit)
from 8c50d89743a8e9024d238c6613ceea35cf160aa0 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log -
The branch, master has been updated
via 9579a6f193f570e4ce2af80f4aac7c2f25ae5b22 (commit)
via c2993f74af4e17790f8afbf16ba1c6884afa4ad4 (commit)
from 7fc8086e11497c96be72859a510f72cb3c4104d5 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via 96c57d26ed790b3e94c935cc4faf5661ea43a80c (commit)
from 4624451b7b78695b3f84e7fff91018ee9df0e589 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via 0cf74151286238890ae0da0863e3a5807f4f3d81 (commit)
from e47d2091136c4d870bb91b8a84eb9f6fd78eb971 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via 8cb0d6280ecc62d03ea6fb5e522f57a80d9e0262 (commit)
from 96c57d26ed790b3e94c935cc4faf5661ea43a80c (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via 045933cf5bf27fbb704e446cf8686f2f761a1ced (commit)
from 0cf74151286238890ae0da0863e3a5807f4f3d81 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log -
The branch, master has been updated
via 97cccb22194380ce84bf6188df90e2438f1176db (commit)
from 9579a6f193f570e4ce2af80f4aac7c2f25ae5b22 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via 733881d22f9864ea371b29d7d1817fb4af6b865c (commit)
from 045933cf5bf27fbb704e446cf8686f2f761a1ced (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log -
The branch, master has been updated
via 825949b810c6e7b7b977283355e658e2edbb8932 (commit)
via 09d1b2324cf02c20daa005e6f5d55dc107303af7 (commit)
from 97cccb22194380ce84bf6188df90e2438f1176db (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 8c41e0e5a6cdcc2bcaf12ec7916c8ae7c04bf1e7 (commit)
from 825949b810c6e7b7b977283355e658e2edbb8932 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via 20086d0f4ac318f245bb48fc45999c9104ddccef (commit)
from 8cb0d6280ecc62d03ea6fb5e522f57a80d9e0262 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via b2f6110d3ac5d60054a7e5a1d365f0a1f67a2f42 (commit)
from 733881d22f9864ea371b29d7d1817fb4af6b865c (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log -
The branch, master has been updated
via 66a26a0ac27462361cb94e3ef1744d275bd95da1 (commit)
from 8c41e0e5a6cdcc2bcaf12ec7916c8ae7c04bf1e7 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 3d280639c4652d6cd35577e333bcd46c2517754c (commit)
from 66a26a0ac27462361cb94e3ef1744d275bd95da1 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via c5e1900879411cf240ddb4c1dcb11e645cbcb03e (commit)
from 20086d0f4ac318f245bb48fc45999c9104ddccef (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via 8b9168fed2c1a16745d3f6d6c69b1ad87ec0515d (commit)
via 0999366b6b36f3084870af0375d686b0cbaae698 (commit)
from c5e1900879411cf240ddb4c1dcb11e645cbcb03e (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2009-03-10
00:00:22.0 +
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2009-03-11 00:00:38.0
+
@@ -1,23 +1,23 @@
-Build status as of Tue Mar 10 00:00:01 2009
+Build status as of Wed Mar
69 matches
Mail list logo
