Greetings all; I really hope someone can help me. I recently upgraded
to the most recent version (from a year-old version) of Samba, on a
server now running on Ubuntu Server Jaunty Jackalope x64. After
upgrading, whenever I play large media files on my Vista machine
streamed from the Samba
Which network device are you using?
when it happens, do a
dmesg|tail
on the server. Anything interesting there?
I had a similar symptoms which turned out to be caused by the Realtek device
on my motherboard and the driver in my Linux distro. (and when I fixed that
by using another driver, my
=
We'll love you just the way you are
if you're perfect.
Alanis Morissette
=
Jeremy Allison wrote:
It's doable, but I wouldn't use that syntax. I'd
use an allowed files = /XXX/ style.
That's what I was thinking, but the question started
off as 'does veto files take !', so that's where my
convoluted syntax example came from.
Not been implemented yet Patch welcome
Hi,
I have a samba share on centos5 that uses AD authentication. I can do
wbinfo -u and it returns the AD users.. but getent only returns the local
centos users.
Any pointers on where i have gone wrong?
I am trying to chown to an AD user/group, but it is now working.. is the
format chown
i had the same problem with samba 3.0.28a on ubuntu and nobody could
answer me what's worng...
so.. if you find a solution, please let me know.
i have no resolution..
gabi
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:33 PM, tsgtsg.sa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a samba share on centos5 that uses AD
The different behaviours are caused by the fact that the two methods
do different things...
They use different libraries and configuration files.
I'm not near a linux box with SaMBa today so I can't show you examples.
You should tell us more about what you're running...
In any case, the first
I'm looking for a way to batch create a list of computers accounts in
Active directroy running on Windows 2000 PDC.
I tried to use perl ldap to create those objects but I didn't manage
to set the sAMAccountType to 805306369 ( apparently this is a read
only auto generated value)
Is there any way
I have been using an old version of OpenLDAP on my Samba servers. I am
setting up a new server and want to use a more recent version.
What versions of OpenLDAP are people on the forum using with Samba?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:55 AM, jamrocknews_jamr...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have been using an old version of OpenLDAP on my Samba servers. I am
setting up a new server and want to use a more recent version.
What versions of OpenLDAP are people on the forum using with Samba?
At work I am using
Hi Quinn,
I was following the doco at
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba__Active_Directory
There is no mention there of ldap/tls etc.
There doesn't seem to be a complete tutorial on setting up samba AD on the
web.. Plenty of doco on it, but all different, and implemented in a
different
based on all the info i found: books and how to's
if you have a samba server member of the domain you don't need ldap / openldap.
you need samba, samba-common, winbind
add samba server to domain and authentificate user / groups from domain.
i wanted to one samba share to be accesible to only
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:22:28PM +1000, tsg wrote:
passwd: files winbind
shadow: files winbind
group: files winbind
Could you explain the difference between wbinfo getent?
You did see the winbind enum users and winbind enum
groups parameters in smb.conf?
Volker
signature.asc
Hi Volker,
Yes in smb.conf i have:
winbind enum users = Yes
winbind enum groups = Yes
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Miguel Medalhamiguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote:
Ah. I thought that the stanza would just disable roaming profiles.
logon path =
I misunderstood your question because your subject line says How to use
local profiles in samba PDC.
Well, you must have a netlogon
Kyle,
You might also need to populate this setting:
A) Only allowing local profiles and disabling roaming profiles:
(start-run-gpedit.msc-Local Computer Policy-Computer
Configuration-Administratrive Templates-System-User Profiles
As a result, each user gets a profile created in C:\Documents and
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Christopher
Perrycpe...@hmdc.harvard.edu wrote:
A) Only allowing local profiles and disabling roaming profiles:
(start-run-gpedit.msc-Local Computer Policy-Computer
Configuration-Administratrive Templates-System-User Profiles
Why don't you just use pdbedit?
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 22:33 +1000, tsg-samba wrote:
Hi Volker,
Yes in smb.conf i have:
winbind enum users = Yes
winbind enum groups = Yes
getent Shows nsswitch is correct, to resolve ADS users and groups.
getent passwd
getent group
wbinfo Shows winbind is doing
Sure enough, I apparently have a Realtek device as well. But swapping
motherboards is absolutely not an option for me... Surely there's
something that can be done!
Here's the output of lshw -C network:
*-network
description: Ethernet interface
product:
I swapped the motherboard because I had too much downtime and wanted to take
it out of the equation - it turned out to be a faulty sata data cable.
I used a driver downloaded from realtek.tw - this is obviously off topic
here - but it's comforting to the team that this is probably not a SaMBa
Paul Accisano kirjoitti:
Sure enough, I apparently have a Realtek device as well. But swapping
motherboards is absolutely not an option for me... Surely there's
something that can be done!
Well, can you buy better ethernet card?
Jul 29 01:13:21 DITE kernel: [ 4616.040048] NETDEV WATCHDOG:
Of course. The only problem is that the PCI-E 16x slot next to my PCI-E
1x slot is taken with a RAID controller, so my options are limited to
tiny cards.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833166015
That one looks fine, but the Newegg comments seem to indicate it is also
a
It could be that tweaking your driver parameters with your curent card could
cure the problem...
We know it's the r8169 from your other logs (which I didn't read - tsk tsk)
Look at your irq allocations
cat /proc/interrupts
See the network driver - note its IRQ - have a look at its corresponding
Hi,
I've managed to configure winbind to use RPC instead of AD to
authenticate users. I was able to do a few auths and from nothing
winbind started to crash with the following error message:
Any hint on what may be the error?
I've already deleted all tdb files and restarted the services,
That link certainly sounds promising. I'll try to induce another crash
after trying the things you specified and see what happens. I really
appreciate your helping me even though this is looking like it's not
even Samba-related.
Your tsk tsk implies that posting one of those logs was a
I've highered log level and got that the dump occurs only when I try
to use pam authentication. Using wbinfo (-t/-u/-g) works.
[2009/07/29 15:04:57, 3] winbindd/winbindd_pam.c:winbindd_pam_auth(827)
[ 3010]: pam auth root
*** glibc detected *** /usr/sbin/winbindd: double free or corruption
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:40:28AM +0100, Illtud Daniel wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
It's doable, but I wouldn't use that syntax. I'd
use an allowed files = /XXX/ style.
That's what I was thinking, but the question started
off as 'does veto files take !', so that's where my
convoluted
Your tsk tsk etc
No - not at all - you inferred that incorrectly. My point was that I'd
not bothered to read your email, so asked you a question I didn't need
to ask.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:24:24PM -0300, Herbert G. Fischer wrote:
I've highered log level and got that the dump occurs only when I try to
use pam authentication. Using wbinfo (-t/-u/-g) works.
[2009/07/29 15:04:57, 3] winbindd/winbindd_pam.c:winbindd_pam_auth(827)
[ 3010]: pam auth root
On 7/29/2009, Jeremy Allison (j...@samba.org) wrote:
Any preference for precedence of 'allowed files' vs 'veto files'?
Or would you want an apache-style 'Order allowed veto' option?
(please say no).
veto files should take precedence.
The way postfix does this when blocking ip ranges but
It's stock Ubuntu 9.04 package.
samba 3.3.2-1u
On 29/julho/2009, at 15:31, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:24:24PM -0300, Herbert G. Fischer wrote:
I've highered log level and got that the dump occurs only when I
try to
use pam authentication. Using wbinfo (-t/-u/-g)
i'm running 2.4.12 on a fedora 10 server at work, and 2.4.15 on fedora
11 server at home, both work great.
jamrock wrote:
I have been using an old version of OpenLDAP on my Samba servers. I am
setting up a new server and want to use a more recent version.
What versions of OpenLDAP are people
Hello All,
I have set up samba server 3.0.33-0.fc8 and successfully created a share
accessible by all machines in my workgroup. When I open up network on my
linux box I can see all other machines in the workgroup. I have set up
other shares on other machines and am able to see them but when I
Quoting Dan Grindstaff d...@oakrun.net:
Hello All,
I have set up samba server 3.0.33-0.fc8 and successfully created a share
accessible by all machines in my workgroup. When I open up network on my
linux box I can see all other machines in the workgroup. I have set up
other shares on other
Warning
this will be a lengthy post. I’ve been beating my head on my desk for days now.
I
have a Samba PDC in an NT4 domain. I have several domain member servers and a
non domain member server.
Versions really don’t matter but for the sake of argument the
systems that are “working” are all
Any version of OpenLDAP should work, in fact any LDAP server should
work(SunONE, Tivoli, Fedora), OpenLDAP is required for smbk5pwd however.
If you want to do replication you should probably use OpenLDAP 2.4.17, it
has a lot of fixes in this area, its not that hard to compile from scratch.
On
sgm...@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us wrote:
sgm...@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us wrote:
I did not get this finished last summer, so decided to just wait and do
it this summer. I have setup my new samba server and was trying to get
some things tweaked to the way that I want them. I thought that I
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:33:33AM +0200, Karolin Seeger wrote:
Download Details
The uncompressed tarballs and patch files have been signed
using GnuPG (ID 6568B7EA). The source code can be downloaded
from:
This is a very minor error, but if someone wants to correct it...
On Samba Wiki page Release Planning for Samba 3.4
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Release_Planning_for_Samba_3.4
The release date of Samba 3.4.0, July 3, was a Friday, not a Wednesday
as it appears on the page.
Thank you
--
Hello again folks,
I give up trying RPC. I'm trying to avoid update samba package of my
Ubuntu 9.04 server (amd64) so I decided to try ADS again. This way I'm
using the following versions:
krb5-user 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-5ubuntu2
samba* 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.1
I'm having problem joining a AD
sgm...@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us wrote:
sgm...@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us wrote:
sgm...@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us wrote:
I did not get this finished last summer, so decided to just wait and do
it this summer. I have setup my new samba server and was trying to get
some things tweaked to the
sgm...@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us wrote:
sgm...@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us wrote:
sgm...@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us wrote:
sgm...@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us wrote:
I did not get this finished last summer, so decided to just wait and
do
it this summer. I have setup my new samba server and
jamrock news_jamr...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:h4pdri$c9...@ger.gmane.org...
I have been using an old version of OpenLDAP on my Samba servers. I am
setting up a new server and want to use a more recent version.
What versions of OpenLDAP are people on the forum using with Samba?
--
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of Jonathon Doran
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 3:29 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Cannot Access Workgroup shares
Quoting Dan Grindstaff d...@oakrun.net:
Hello,
I want to use crackcheck to check password complexity, but users (when
password change failed because of complexity check fail) gets only
information about valid password length, password history. I think that may
be a problem for users.
How can I (or Can I?) give them information
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2009-07-28
00:00:12.0 -0600
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2009-07-29 00:00:02.0
-0600
@@ -1,22 +1,22 @@
-Build status as of Tue Jul 28 06:00:01 2009
+Build status as of Wed Jul
The annotated tag, release-3-3-7 has been created
at b4445158264241900fb4106cc81a9b849b2b264f (tag)
tagging 55abe9f10abc97ad16e6c0c2fcf5303f5a700abd (commit)
replaces release-3-3-6
tagged by Karolin Seeger
on Wed Jul 29 09:07:25 2009 +0200
- Log
Author: kseeger
Date: 2009-07-29 01:37:12 -0600 (Wed, 29 Jul 2009)
New Revision: 1312
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-webrev=1312
Log:
Announce Samba 3.3.7
Karolin
Added:
trunk/history/samba-3.3.7.html
Modified:
trunk/header_columns.html
Author: kseeger
Date: 2009-07-29 02:10:48 -0600 (Wed, 29 Jul 2009)
New Revision: 1313
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-webrev=1313
Log:
Fix german umlauts and brackets
Karolin
Modified:
trunk/history/samba-3.3.7.html
Changeset:
Modified:
The branch, master has been updated
via d8543da9dad3286cd330b98374405edb9f976e77 (commit)
from 2d0cd3e53ad59f3fe4a42a3158fc85f37e6d6560 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
Author: kseeger
Date: 2009-07-29 02:35:44 -0600 (Wed, 29 Jul 2009)
New Revision: 1314
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-webrev=1314
Log:
Move some entries to the history page...
Karolin
Modified:
trunk/history/index.html
trunk/index.html
Changeset:
The annotated tag, build_3.2.11_ctdb_62 has been created
at a627237b9fa4a683d5863ef53292b51c88c8e8b2 (tag)
tagging 2298ac9776d9f60858a82c242826a596cc8557c3 (commit)
replaces build_3.2.11_ctdb.61
tagged by Michael Adam
on Wed Jul 29 11:56:27 2009 +0200
- Log
The branch, v3-2-ctdb has been updated
via ebd709c5b8e62b3e27cdd4aa0975f992399e (commit)
from 2298ac9776d9f60858a82c242826a596cc8557c3 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=obnox/samba-ctdb.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-ctdb
- Log
The branch, v3-4-ctdb has been updated
via 1941ba51b4b528d2ed0c53f692a67ddb1ab64403 (commit)
from 7e0cdb8161a1d8d9187f8d5a5baf83002ea0bd77 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=obnox/samba-ctdb.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-4-ctdb
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 94a139afe5d607b09753eec36127e5b682978c5a (commit)
from d8543da9dad3286cd330b98374405edb9f976e77 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, v3-4-ctdb has been updated
via 3ac8fc7835b1f1335c0c5c6df215302a21567bc3 (commit)
from 1941ba51b4b528d2ed0c53f692a67ddb1ab64403 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=obnox/samba-ctdb.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-4-ctdb
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via d498532389df7b1f6b1d01e47166f5697a742147 (commit)
via 8da2f93716c23056a9de4a418bc29252a3b5b592 (commit)
via ae58ff981df4acadb43f0c89e75b760538673bf4 (commit)
via fac81b375099e32f8124ae3cba631bb5fe36b1cb (commit)
via
The branch, master has been updated
via 9b461ad7eb4d478397fe56f37f7c8ffca6724b23 (commit)
from d498532389df7b1f6b1d01e47166f5697a742147 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 320a9aff7094aed8d249dea16f411233035e9222 (commit)
via 57b5269038624b70e117025af9b977e0addcdc8e (commit)
via ceab454bcf059903db5dbc5bb9351d4f5eae419d (commit)
via d2eb7f8853b9e1cad3919772e592e989b5cd6cf0 (commit)
from
The branch, master has been updated
via 6e044a22cf232798efbd40a2b55fd9556483d403 (commit)
via 358a55e50d0d9143ffdb2bc3df6701307c1fb3df (commit)
via b429c3c5cbd83231027be9e6efc06e9da42d9114 (commit)
from 320a9aff7094aed8d249dea16f411233035e9222 (commit)
The branch, master has been updated
via 32a69b0efa078b069802470be6488a4efe32961d (commit)
via 52f21f5a92eb14df7540a2ae9e212d936e646c06 (commit)
via 7f67f7395e2233f0bba2e9662404aad49e13f645 (commit)
via 67c5bfb5f02c9d45a32d976021ede4fb2174dfe9 (commit)
via
61 matches
Mail list logo
