Re: [Samba] SMBD CPU climbs sky high when writing DPX files

2009-11-05 Thread Andy Liebman
Hi Volker, The problem is the following: When creating a file we have to prove that the file does not exist in a different upper/lower case combination. Under Unix, the only way to prove this is to list the whole directory and do a case insensitive comparison on each existing file. Thank

Re: [Samba] Print Driver Detection

2009-11-05 Thread morgan
You'll need to install the correct CUPS drivers for each printer. If the printers support Postscript, you might be able to get away with the generic Postscript driver and then just download the PPDs from the Windows server. You'd probably do better asking on the CUPS list, though.

Re: [Samba] SMBD CPU climbs sky high when writing DPX files

2009-11-05 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 01:43:59PM -0500, Andy Liebman wrote: The problem is the following: When creating a file we have to prove that the file does not exist in a different upper/lower case combination. Under Unix, the only way to prove this is to list the whole directory and do a case

Re: [Samba] [bounce] Problem with pam_winbind

2009-11-05 Thread Alex Samad
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 08:16:51AM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote: I was wondering if any one has had any thought on this ? or maybe how I would go about trying to debug it.. I haven't used any of the ldap stuff that you are using so it's beyond me at this point. I wish I could help

Re: [Samba] [bounce] Problem with pam_winbind

2009-11-05 Thread Robert LeBlanc
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au wrote: I haven't used any of the ldap stuff that you are using so it's beyond me at this point. I wish I could help more, I know how it is to be in that position. Is this just a member workstation/server or is it trying to be a

[Samba] net ads seg fault

2009-11-05 Thread Paras pradhan
I have been trying to connect my samba (latest stable) to ADS . kinit seems to be fine and I can see the key using klist. But when I do: net ads join -U samba I get r...@web # ./net ads join -U samba Enter samba's password: Segmentation Fault (core dumped) r...@web # --- Don't know what is

[Samba] Join domain on one PDC server but not another

2009-11-05 Thread Mark Fox
Symptoms: Can join machines to the domain on one PDC server, but not on another nearly identical PDC server. Details: I have two separate machines on the same network configured as PDC servers and running Samba 3.3.2. Both are running Ubuntu Linux and Samba is configured identically as far as I

Re: [Samba] [bounce] Problem with pam_winbind

2009-11-05 Thread Alex Samad
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 03:04:38PM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote: On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au wrote: I haven't used any of the ldap stuff that you are using so it's beyond me at this point. I wish I could help more, I know how it is to be in that

[Samba] Vista clients having Issues Copying files from Samba Server

2009-11-05 Thread Anthony Giggins
Hello, I'm running samba-3.0.33 (samba-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4) On Centos 5.4 and some files have issues being copied from the Samba server to the Vista (Service Pack 1) clients local disk via Windows Explorer, copying too the Samba server also has no issues and copying via the CMD prompt has no

Re: [Samba] problem with force group parameter

2009-11-05 Thread vishesh kumar
I also facing same issue. Does it mean that we cant specify secondary group as 'force group' in group. On 11/5/09, Andrey Zykov and...@dce.ifmo.ru wrote: Hello! I tryed to configure Debian Linux file server as Windows 2003 domain member using samba with security = ADS mode and stucked with

Re: [Samba] problem with force group parameter

2009-11-05 Thread Gary Dale
Force group forces the Unix group to be whatever you force it to. It has nothing to do with what group the connecting use belongs to. vishesh kumar wrote: I also facing same issue. Does it mean that we cant specify secondary group as 'force group' in group. On 11/5/09, Andrey Zykov

[Samba] samba and ads authentication

2009-11-05 Thread Tom Montague
I am looking at setting up ADS authentication for my current samba configuration. I am quite wary of making big changes that I do not understand as there are shares currently setup and I do not want to lose this. I have read through the how to's and I am at the point where I want to Create the

Re: [Samba] Phantom sharename

2009-11-05 Thread mike5
John H Terpstra - Samba Team wrote: On 11/04/2009 09:47 PM, mike5 wrote: smbclient reports there is a sharename 'l' that points to /usr/local/Documents on the host, but there is no reference to it in the smb.conf file. I have puzzled over this for days - I must have missed something

Re: [Samba] FreeBSD 7.2 domain member problem

2009-11-05 Thread Ivo Karabojkov
Yes, FreeBSD supports nsswitch and I tried getent passwd - the result is the same. Maybe I should show my config files in my previous post, sorry: smb.conf: (very similar to Chapter 7, example 7.7 and 7.8 of the Samba Guide) [global] # unix charset = LOCALE workgroup = DOMAIN realm =

[Samba] Optimizing Samba to stream movies

2009-11-05 Thread Brett Alton
I am sharing some of my personal videos on a local network via Ubuntu 9.10/Samba 3.42 on my wired PC to wireless Windows XP and Vista users with a 802.11g router in between. Some of the movies can stream fast enough to watch uninterrupted, while others seem to skip often. I searched online to see

Re: [Samba] Optimizing Samba to stream movies

2009-11-05 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 10:50:47PM -0500, Brett Alton wrote: socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 I very much doubt this helps. Modern kernels are better at figuring out the windows size themselves. Please remove the line again :-) Volker signature.asc Description:

Re: [Samba] Error connecting WinXP client to Samba PDC: DNS name does not exist / RCODE_NAME_ERROR

2009-11-05 Thread Christian Geiger
NBT is explicitly activated on the client (after the standard option didn't work) and nmbd is running on the server. Thx for the pointer anyway! The SRV DNS records might not hurt but would they really help? That seems a bit to me like just fighting the symptoms. Regarding that I do not have

Re: [Samba] samba and ads authentication

2009-11-05 Thread sebastian.rajan
Using the following option to configure for ADS --with-ldap and --with-ads in configure command Also, you must have Kerberos library installed, so give --with-krb5=$(PATH_TO_KRB_LIB)/lib/ If the configure fails, check the path and version of kerberos u r using. Regards, Seban

Re: [Samba] problem with force group parameter

2009-11-05 Thread Andrey Zykov
But what about this: In Samba 2.0.5 and above this parameter has extended functionality in the following way. If the group name listed here has a '+' character prepended to it then the current user accessing the share only has the primary group default assigned to this group if they are

Re: [Samba] FreeBSD 7.2 domain member problem

2009-11-05 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Ivo Karabojkov wrote: group: files winbind group_compat: nis hosts: files dns networks: files passwd: files winbind passwd_compat: nis shells: files services: compat services_compat: nis protocols: files Can you try commenting out group_compat and passwd_compat? The

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated

2009-11-05 Thread Jeremy Allison
The branch, master has been updated via c2df97f... Fix up some of the timing constants for DELAYWRITE. Add some extra tests up test_delayed_write_update6 to investigate what happens to a sticky write handle after a second handle close. Jeremy. from 5fb9d06... Python tests for the

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-5-test updated

2009-11-05 Thread Jeremy Allison
The branch, v3-5-test has been updated via 139711d... Fix up some of the timing constants for DELAYWRITE. Add some extra tests up test_delayed_write_update6 to investigate what happens to a sticky write handle after a second handle close. Jeremy. (cherry picked from commit

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated

2009-11-05 Thread Jeremy Allison
The branch, master has been updated via 7f9fe12... Get closer to an accurate model of Windows timestamp changes. Normal non truncate writes always cause the timestamp to be set on close. Once a close is done on a handle this can reset the sticky write time to current time also. Updated

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-5-test updated

2009-11-05 Thread Jeremy Allison
The branch, v3-5-test has been updated via a153f7d... Get closer to an accurate model of Windows timestamp changes. Normal non truncate writes always cause the timestamp to be set on close. Once a close is done on a handle this can reset the sticky write time to current time also.

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated

2009-11-05 Thread Jeremy Allison
The branch, master has been updated via 2f09516... Fix explicit set of write time on close. Jeremy. from 7f9fe12... Get closer to an accurate model of Windows timestamp changes. Normal non truncate writes always cause the timestamp to be set on close. Once a close is done on a

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-5-test updated

2009-11-05 Thread Jeremy Allison
The branch, v3-5-test has been updated via bf21f34... Fix explicit set of write time on close. Jeremy. (cherry picked from commit 2f09516a6be67d3e51ffc611ae2daa3210f07cd8) from a153f7d... Get closer to an accurate model of Windows timestamp changes. Normal non truncate writes

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated

2009-11-05 Thread Jeremy Allison
The branch, master has been updated via 0551284... Simplify the logic - remove extraneous argument and calls to set_close_write_time(). We were treating a file time set on close as a sticky write time set, and I don't think it is. I will add a torture test later to RAW-CLOSE to confirm

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-5-test updated

2009-11-05 Thread Jeremy Allison
The branch, v3-5-test has been updated via 329969f... Simplify the logic - remove extraneous argument and calls to set_close_write_time(). We were treating a file time set on close as a sticky write time set, and I don't think it is. I will add a torture test later to RAW-CLOSE to

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated

2009-11-05 Thread Jeremy Allison
The branch, master has been updated via e434934... Remove the smbd:writetimeupdatedelay change Metze added. Metze please explain why you added this. Change --maximum-runtime=900 for smbtorture4 with BASE-DELAYWRITE. Should allow it to successfully complete now. Jeremy. from

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-5-test updated

2009-11-05 Thread Jeremy Allison
The branch, v3-5-test has been updated via 08e57bd... Remove the smbd:writetimeupdatedelay change Metze added. Metze please explain why you added this. Change --maximum-runtime=900 for smbtorture4 with BASE-DELAYWRITE. Should allow it to successfully complete now. Jeremy. (cherry picked

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated

2009-11-05 Thread Jeremy Allison
The branch, master has been updated via 977fa4e... Revert commit 0551284dc08eb93ef7b2b2227a45e5ec21d482fb - simplify the logic. This was incorrect (I'll revisit this tomorrow). Jeremy. from e434934... Remove the smbd:writetimeupdatedelay change Metze added. Metze please explain

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-5-test updated

2009-11-05 Thread Jeremy Allison
The branch, v3-5-test has been updated via 34ad43a... Revert commit 0551284dc08eb93ef7b2b2227a45e5ec21d482fb - simplify the logic. This was incorrect (I'll revisit this tomorrow). Jeremy. (cherry picked from commit 977fa4e37741d613df1583b7e0e83c1f0a6ce38c) from 08e57bd... Remove

[SCM] CTDB repository - branch master updated - ctdb-1.0.103-10-g5e13a25

2009-11-05 Thread Ronnie Sahlberg
The branch, master has been updated via 5e13a25df5ccf184bd48595c99765a592bbc5969 (commit) via 8001ae580bcc28d45f6026b529d7ffc247cbba34 (commit) via e8e7129ff1371065fbd75e1aea844d6d04a96fa9 (commit) from eda052101728cf922ce892e3c53b4f37e7ceac42 (commit)

[SCM] CTDB repository - annotated tag ctdb-1.0.104 created - ctdb-1.0.104

2009-11-05 Thread Ronnie Sahlberg
The annotated tag, ctdb-1.0.104 has been created at bd5c001b56097d1e6ffef7af04744794edec090a (tag) tagging 5e13a25df5ccf184bd48595c99765a592bbc5969 (commit) replaces ctdb-1.0.103 tagged by Ronnie Sahlberg on Fri Nov 6 11:28:59 2009 +1100 - Log

Build status as of Fri Nov 6 07:00:09 2009

2009-11-05 Thread build
URL: http://build.samba.org/ --- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2009-11-05 00:00:07.0 -0700 +++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2009-11-06 00:00:11.0 -0700 @@ -1,22 +1,22 @@ -Build status as of Thu Nov 5 07:00:05 2009 +Build status as of Fri Nov

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated

2009-11-05 Thread Jeremy Allison
The branch, master has been updated via c99dd5c... Got the logic simplification worked out so we still pass BASE-DELAYWRITE and also RAW-CLOSE. Jeremy. from 977fa4e... Revert commit 0551284dc08eb93ef7b2b2227a45e5ec21d482fb - simplify the logic. This was incorrect (I'll revisit

[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-5-test updated

2009-11-05 Thread Jeremy Allison
The branch, v3-5-test has been updated via 2245694... Got the logic simplification worked out so we still pass BASE-DELAYWRITE and also RAW-CLOSE. Jeremy. (cherry picked from commit c99dd5c23e25f4c1cc34f223f563915c0aa4bb6f) from 34ad43a... Revert commit