On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:19:12 +0530, vishesh kumar
wrote:
> Dear friends
> My domain users in two diffrent OU, one OU is TEMP_USERS and other OU
> is PEOPLE.
> What i should mention in smb.conf ?
> If i mention
> ldap user suffix = ou=PEOPLE, then
> users of ou TEMP_USERS is not able to auth
Dear friends
My domain users in two diffrent OU, one OU is TEMP_USERS and other OU
is PEOPLE.
What i should mention in smb.conf ?
If i mention
ldap user suffix = ou=PEOPLE, then
users of ou TEMP_USERS is not able to authenticate.
Please guide me.
Thanks
--
http://linuxinterviews.blogspot.
Dear friends
My domain users in two diffrent OU, one OU is TEMP_USERS and other OU
is PEOPLE.
What i should mention in smb.conf ?
If i mention
ldap user suffix = ou=PEOPLE, then
users of ou TEMP_USERS is not able to authenticate.
Please guide me.
Thanks
--
http://linuxinterviews.blogspo
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 09:19:00AM -0400, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
>
> Jeremy did you get a chance to look at this . can you please pass your
> comments on this.?
Just wanted to let you know I haven't forgotten this, just haven't had
time to get to it yet. Keep pinging me until I respond
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 16:52 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:19:36AM +1030, Indexer wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> > On 20/10/2010, at 4:31 AM, john_deli...@ceridian.ca wrote:
> >
> > > I wasn't sure DFS was a good fit, my understa
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:19:36AM +1030, Indexer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 20/10/2010, at 4:31 AM, john_deli...@ceridian.ca wrote:
>
> > I wasn't sure DFS was a good fit, my understanding of DFS is limited
> > (reading up today..).
>
> As i understood
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/10/2010, at 4:31 AM, john_deli...@ceridian.ca wrote:
> I wasn't sure DFS was a good fit, my understanding of DFS is limited
> (reading up today..).
As i understood it, Samba does not support DFS? Am i wrong? I have done some
googling into t
W dniu 19.10.2010 16:50, Adrian Graham pisze:
> Folks,
>
> Having some fun with winbind on Samba 3.5.5 on RHEL5 and/or Centos5.
> I’ve got it working so ssh logins work correctly and file permissions
> are seemingly correct with created files etc. Backend authentication
> is from a Win2K3R2 box ru
> I am looking to upgrade my Samba server to Samba 3.5.x from Samba 3.0.20 and
> openldap from 2.2.13 to 2.3.43.
> Is there anyway to do this and still keep my current domain intact?
> The interest in upgrading is so that we can suppport Win 7 systems.
>
Of course you can keep your current domain
I am looking to upgrade my Samba server to Samba 3.5.x from Samba 3.0.20
and openldap from 2.2.13 to 2.3.43.
Is there anyway to do this and still keep my current domain intact?
The interest in upgrading is so that we can suppport Win 7 systems.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the followin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The last cifs-utils release (4.6) was on July 30th, so it's probably a
good time to go ahead and release a new one with kernel 2.6.36 shipping
soon. Major highlights:
- - new cifscreds program has been added. This will eventually allow for
stashing
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 08:54:38PM +0200, Olivier Arnaud wrote:
> I built a home network storage using a dedicated computer running a Debian
> distro with Samba.
> Since I don't need it always up, I activated the sleep mode feature on
> Debian.
> My problem is that this computer is going to sleep m
Hello,
I built a home network storage using a dedicated computer running a Debian
distro with Samba.
Since I don't need it always up, I activated the sleep mode feature on
Debian.
My problem is that this computer is going to sleep mode, even if Samba is
connected.
Does anybody here have an idea o
I wasn't sure DFS was a good fit, my understanding of DFS is limited
(reading up today..).
From what I've read it seems I'd need to host the DFS root on a
highly-available server, and have links from there to my three single
hosts (all with shared SAN access). Unfortunately, I only have these
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:34 PM, wrote:
> We multiple (3) servers with access to SAN storage using Oracle OCFS2
> (clustered filesystem, allows each of the 3 nodes to simultaneously access
> to the same SAN disk). We need to somehow provide Windows clients with
> access to a location on this sh
I'm working on a project which requires a highly-available Samba service
in a hurry.
We multiple (3) servers with access to SAN storage using Oracle OCFS2
(clustered filesystem, allows each of the 3 nodes to simultaneously access
to the same SAN disk). We need to somehow provide Windows client
Maybe I missed it- but do you have problems if the client and server
are on the same network segment?
Are all the local WINS servers samba servers or something else?
On 10/19/2010 12:45 PM, Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 10/19/2010 9:47 AM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
Is your samba server also a W
On 10/19/2010 12:45 PM, Eric A. Hall wrote:
> Both responses show STATUS_SUCCESS in the SMB message. The only potential
> difference that I can see between them is that the Samba response shows
> "Security signatures are not supported" in the reply message. Perhaps this
> is preventing the client
On 10/19/2010 9:47 AM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
> Is your samba server also a WINS server? That may help browsing issues.
The nodes don't have any problems finding or communicating with the
server, the server just does not want to provide data. I have three
distinct networks that are interconnecte
On 10/19/2010 03:53 PM, Ludek Finstrle wrote:
Hi Ludek,
Hi,
Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:12:16AM +0100, Lukasz Zalewski napsal(a):
This message is a testament to the great work samba team has done, but
its also an encouragement to those of you that still not sure if samba4
will work in your environm
Hi,
Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:12:16AM +0100, Lukasz Zalewski napsal(a):
> This message is a testament to the great work samba team has done, but
> its also an encouragement to those of you that still not sure if samba4
> will work in your environment.
it's nice to know it. How you cooperate wit
Folks,
Having some fun with winbind on Samba 3.5.5 on RHEL5 and/or Centos5.
I’ve got it working so ssh logins work correctly and file permissions
are seemingly correct with created files etc. Backend authentication
is from a Win2K3R2 box running RFC2372 extensions (ie not SFU) and all
UIDs etc are
Hello,
First and foremost, thanks *very* much for ctdb. It's a joy to use
after banging around with other HA solutions. We're planning to use
it to export Samba and NFS shares throughout campus.
I'm having one problem with the NFS part though. When ctdbd first
starts statd (we're using CTDB_M
Greetings,
Just for completeness I am seeing the same problem building Samba 3.5.6
under Solaris 10:
Had to manually add "-lintl" to the LIBS option in the Makefile.
...
Linking shared library bin/pam_winbind.so
Undefined first referenced
symbol
Greetings,
I was able to get 3.4.9 to build on my Solaris 10 boxes - but nothing
later. I've been building my own samba from source for far longer than
I care to admit (because I should know more about samba by now than I
do.) I've never had so many problems building the source has I have ha
Is your samba server also a WINS server? That may help browsing issues.
Do you have "smb ports" defined in smb.conf?
The default is
smb ports = 445 139
I found if I set
smb ports = 139
some clients would have trouble locating shares or authenticating to
servers.
wiki.samba.org should h
The following may help "explain" the error:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Myths
So if you copy the file it is OK, but if the backup job runs an
integrity check first it fails? What is involved in the integrity
check? Is it somehow opening a connection to the server before starting
Jeremy did you get a chance to look at this . can you please pass your comments
on this.?
Thanks
Suresh
-Original Message-
From: Volker Lendecke [mailto:volker.lende...@sernet.de]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 1:16 PM
To: Kandukuru, Suresh
Cc: j...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Res
I have a cifs-mount on an ubuntu 10.04 client which do not show all files.
On other machines I can see all 58,000 files in a folder but on this
special machine I see only 122 files.
The server is an brave old smbd "Version 3.0.20b-3.5-SUSE" serving a
big network since years without anny troubles.
Hi All,
I've been running a Samba 3.4.0 on Ubuntu 9.10 for over a year at a
friend's office and it has been extremely stable. But I've suddenly hit a
scenario where Windows 7 clients can no longer properly sync the main
share as 'Offline Files'
I found it highly unreliable under Vista Bus
Hi All,
I've been running a Samba 3.4.0 on Ubuntu 9.10 for over a year at a
friend's office and it has been extremely stable. But I've suddenly hit a
scenario where Windows 7 clients can no longer properly sync the main
share as 'Offline Files'
I found it highly unreliable under Vista Bus
Hi all,
This message is a testament to the great work samba team has done, but
its also an encouragement to those of you that still not sure if samba4
will work in your environment.
This semester we have moved from samba 3.0.X DC to samba4 DC for
students, and things are working great
The mov
Hi
On 19 October 2010 01:48, Paul Bradley wrote:
> I have a LOT of questions!!! This may take a while. I know some of this
> stuff is at the edge of what Samba4 is just becoming able to do, so if
> anyone who knows feels this is better posted on samba-technical I'd
> appreciate a cross-post from
I tried it with "smb ports 139" to no avail. Same problem.
The backup job takes that long because the windows box first runs an
integrity check. If I just copy the file manually it takes a couple of
minutes. As already mentioned the other samba server 3.4.7 works without
any problems.
What does th
I was running 3.0.25c (I think) LDAP PDC for a couple of years and just
tried swapping in a new 3.5.4 setup. I had some problems so I wiped all
the entries and *.tdb files, and started from scratch.
Problem in a nutshell: I can't browse the domain normally, nor can I logon
to the domain. However
35 matches
Mail list logo
