On 08/12/11 00:03, John Heim wrote:
How much of a resource hog is a PDC? My understanding is that
authentication is done vs a BDC if available. I configured my new file
server as the domain PDC because I figured it would already have to run
samba. I have two other machines configured as BDCs to
On 07/12/11 21:37, Gémes Géza wrote:
2011-12-07 15:41 keltezéssel, Adam Tauno Williams írta:
I upgraded by S3 domain to S4 using the upgrade script. To do that i
had to have the S4 test box connected to the production network. Now I
want to take it to the test network. But the Bind 9.8.x
On 06.12.2011 17:54, TAKAHASHI Motonobu wrote:
On 12/06/2011 10:26 AM, Timothy Madden wrote:
On my network there is no domain master browser, and my nmbd is
spamming my /var/log/messages file with messages that it cound not
find one. Can I configure nmbd not to look for the domain master
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 17:03 -0600, John Heim wrote:
How much of a resource hog is a PDC? My understanding is that authentication
is done vs a BDC if available. I configured my new file server as the domain
PDC because I figured it would already have to run samba. I have two other
machines
Hello
I have Samba 3.0.33-3.29.el5 on Centos 5.7 and I hear there is no WINS
replication for it. I have a sub-net where I would like to use all
machines for production (they are product testing servers), and I would
like to be able to reboot any one of them as needed.
Since the sub-net is
On 08/12/11 12:15, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 17:03 -0600, John Heim wrote:
How much of a resource hog is a PDC? My understanding is that authentication
is done vs a BDC if available. I configured my new file server as the domain
PDC because I figured it would already have
I have a s3.4 pdc with a bdc,, pdc is serving around 80 users on
terminal services and another 50 fat clients,,, acts as the file
server.. roaming profiles etc... I have no issues other than the network
card only being 100mb,, I do have a throughput issues.. but that is on
the table..
On
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 08:36 -0500, Aaron E. wrote:
I have a s3.4 pdc with a bdc,, pdc is serving around 80 users on
terminal services and another 50 fat clients,,, acts as the file
server.. roaming profiles etc... I have no issues other than the network
card only being 100mb,, I do have a
From: Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org
With Samba3 domain control there isn't really a BDC/PDC distinction.
Every box is a PDC that operates in parallel with the other DCs. That
is a bit different than a true NT4 domain.
But one machine has to have the master copy of the
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hi
On 7 December 2011 22:06, Jean-Yves Avenard jyaven...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to make so the uid/SID are matched in such a way that a
username keeps the same uid as before.
For example, editing on the domain controller the ldap entries that
contain the
On 12/07/2011 1:28 PM, steve wrote:
Hi everyone
openSUSE 12.1
After a recent Samba 4 pull I have these errors:
Dec 7 19:53:37 hh3 named[3121]: command channel listening on
127.0.0.1#953
Dec 7 19:53:37 hh3 named[3121]: the working directory is not writable
Dec 7 19:53:37 hh3 named[3121]:
I'm not sure if this is an LDAP issue, a Samba issue, a BSD issue or a
FreeNAS issue...
I'm working at migrating a large block of file shares from an aging
CentOS/Samba 3.0.9 server to a FreeNAS (8.0.2) server. (The FreeNAS box is
running FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 and Samba 3.5.11.) I will
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Charles Tryon charles.tr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if this is an LDAP issue, a Samba issue, a BSD issue or a
FreeNAS issue...
However, my observation in FreeNAS is that, using LDAP, THIS DOESN'T WORK.
If I set the Unix folder permissions in a share to
Hi Dale, hi everyone.
Thanks. I now have the managed keys cleared:
Dec 9 06:57:33 hh3 named[3125]: managed-keys-zone ./IN: loaded serial 0
Stop bind and see if /var/run/named/named.pid remains. You may have a
stale pid that needs removing manually.
I had a go at that:
rm
The branch, master has been updated
via 6316335 s3: Fix typos
from a47970c Add tests for srvsvc python interface. Thanks Dhananjay
Sathe
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project Samba GTK+ frontends.
The branch, master has been updated
via 00bf514449d4a7910d327c6af54512f681d7e5b6 (commit)
via
The branch, master has been updated
via 664eb70 s3-dbwrap: is not required when taking a function pointer
via 4856033 s3-dbwrap: Make dbwrap_fallback_wipe private
via d9e5368 s3-dbwrap: Avoid an else by an early return
via 5cda77d s3-dbwrap: Make
The branch, master has been updated
via 03e5f58 pyldb: Add more docstrings.
via e76c981 samba.drs_utils: Use new style classes and exceptions, fix
formatting of docstrings to make pydoctor happy.
via 452d1ef samba.kcc_utils: Fix formatting to match PEP8, make
pydoctor
The branch, master has been updated
via 31eba61 Add test for PEP8 - currently all errors are ignored, but
we warn about them - and can ratchet if we want to.
via eae3e62 Add pep8.
via 624a78d testtools: Update to new upstream revision.
from 03e5f58 pyldb: Add more
The branch, master has been updated
via 2fb8a4d Support uxsuccess.
from 01a3d51 now that samba_3_waf is just a regular part of the build,
remove seperate tree
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=build-farm.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 85f8d97 Revert Install (platform-independent) python scripts to
the PYTHONDIR rather than PYTHONARCHDIR.
via 0e9b092 Add 'make pep8' target.
from 31eba61 Add test for PEP8 - currently all errors are ignored, but
we warn about them -
The autobuild test system has detected an intermittent failing test in
the current master tree.
The autobuild log of the failure is available here:
http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2011-12-09-0230/flakey.log
The samba3 build logs are available here:
The branch, master has been updated
via c01efc1 s4 dns: Update requests with QCLASS != IN or ALL trigger
NOTIMPLEMENTED errors
via 358a81e s4 dns: Add test to prove two updates in one packet are a
FORMERR
via 509acc7 s4 dns: More explicitly use the first question of an
23 matches
Mail list logo
