Re: [Samba] not able to log on (PDC with ldap backend)
Hi Gaiseric, I was able to see the PDC in the network neighborhood till I joined to the Domain. Now, since I'm set up the WINS server at the client, I can also log on the PDC, so everthing is fine now :) Thx for your support ;) But do you see Account Flags: [W ] for the Vista machine account? Did you also see a machine account for the samba PDC itself? It should include Account Flags:[S ] Are is the Vista client configured to use WINS? On 12/17/12 10:29, ingo.schm...@binarysignals.net wrote: Hi, I just posted my smb.conf to pastebin: http://pastebin.com/r29mgMcK I haven't specified ports - I assumed the default ones should do. I guess I ran more into a client side issue but I actually don't know. pdbedit -Lv shows the Administrator and the respective machine account. The only attribute I miss is the [A] for the Administrator account, it shows a [U] only. But thats cannot be the reason why I cannot logon. Im also able to ping the client from the server. So the client is basically able to connect. Thx, Ingo Hi Attachments are not supported on the mailing list. Does the pdbedit -Lv /machinename$/ command on the samba server show the machine account?The account flags should be [W ] only. In LDAP, you should see the following attributes objectClass=sambaSamAccount sambaNTPassword samabSID sambaAccountFlags= [W ] sambaPrimaryGroupSID I found that with Samba 3.5.x some of the ldap attributes were not set correctly and I had to manually fix the sambaAccountFlags entry. Have you specified any ports in the smb.conf. You should stay with the default smb ports = 445 139 Windows clients may try initially connecting on port 445 (SMB over TCP) then connect to 139 (SMB over Netbios over TCP.) In theory, you shouldn't need 445 but find disabling in on samba sometimes confuses windows clients. On 12/17/12 04:31, ingo.schm...@binarysignals.net wrote: Hello, I set up my first PDC with LDAP as backend. I'm able to join a vista client to the domain. However, when want to log onto after rebooting the client, it claims that the logon server is n/a. My smb and slapd.confs are attached. Any ideas what i did wrong or missed to configure? Thx, Ingo My samba Version is: 3.5.4-5.11.1-2573-SUSE-SL11.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Error with active Libvirt Bridge (virbr0)
On 09:59:31 wrote Börje Johnsson: Just want to report an error in samba configuration / setup. That is not a samba problem. I installed Samba 4 GA on a fresh installation of Ubuntu 12.04. The server is a testbed and has the virtualization package installed also. I have two network interfaces exept lo: eth0 and virbr0. In the provisioning step samba correctly finds my eth0 network interface: Looking up IPv4 addresses More than one IPv4 address found. Using 172.20.10.19 After I provision Samba I try to test according to the HOWTO and host lookup fails: # host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.hrt.local ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached After i disable virbr0 everything works as intended (i reran the provisioning step, haven't checked if that was nessesary). So, you have found that the bridge definition from libvirt for the bridge virbr0 is the problem. The real problem is, that libvirt adds some iptable rules during bridge creation. So, never ever use libvirt created bridges. To solve this, I prefer not to use libvirt for this task. - create a host bridge br0 via brctl - create a new interface or hook up the old one in libvirt gui to br0 - reboot the host !!! host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.hrt.local _ldap._tcp.hrt.local has SRV record 0 100 389 hrmfile.hrt.local. cheers BJ -- regards Harry Jede -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] How to Customize VFS Module Error Message?
Hi Folks, I am writing a VFS module. In certain case, I need to set the error number to NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. At the client side, I wish I could see Wrong password as error message. However, what I have seen is No such device or address. They look irrelevant at all. So, here is my question. In VFS module, is there any way to customize the error message seen at client side? So that the message can actually reflect what has happened in VFS module. Thanks Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba4 Domain UP, but no roaming profiles
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 02:45 +1100, Stephen Jones wrote: The problem is your smb.conf [profiles]. The only options you need are the path and read only = no. Control access from Windows with an ACL applied to the profiles share security properties rather than forcing permissions from Samba. S4 is different from S3. I'm not sure if those mask options work in S4 but, if they do, those values will deny all access set through extended ACLs because those are applied through the group class. Fix smb.conf Ok, did that. Anyway, for whatever reason roaming profiles started worked. Even before I make this change. and start with an empty profiles directory Totally and completely not an option. This is a migrated domain with existing profiles. root:root. getfacl will show you the Posix ACLs created from Windows. From Windows ADUC add the roaming profiles path to the user's profile. They already have this attribute by virtue of the migration. The existence of the attribute has been verified. Tip: There is a GPO setting under computer-policies-templates-system-user profiles to add the administrators group to roaming profiles. This is a good idea, otherwise administrators cannot browse the profile folders. Cool, I'll take a look on that. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] windows 8 jointo samba 3 domain
Hi ... I have problem join win 8 pro to samba domain after patch registry join to domain name XX work OK bud join domain .YYY don't work windows send only DNS request to SRV record any Idea? -- Alexandr Seidl Vývoj IT RESAL spol. s r. o. člen sítě Orange Green Orange Green Ústí nad Orlicí M.R. Štefánika 264, 562 01 Ústí nad Orlicí -- IBM Premier Business Partner Lenovo Premium Business Partner Authorized Warranty Service Provider IBM/Lenovo tel: +420 468 000 100 fax: +420 465 520 628 gsm: +420 732 836 639 mail: se...@og.cz web: www.og.cz hotline: +420 468 002 775 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] SAMBA4: Caching enabled on roaming profile share; cannot disable.
After logging in the Windows Event Log records the following: Windows has detected that Offline Caching is enabled on the Roaming Profile share - to avoid potential profile corruption, Offline Caching must be disabled on shares where roaming user profiles are stored. But navigating to the share via Computer Management - System Tools - Shares - Profiles - Properties - Caching - Unchecking Allow caching of files in this shared folder only results in an Changes cannot be saved. Access is denied dialog box when the changes are applied. -- Adam Tauno Williams GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] windows 8 jointo samba 3 domain
Samba 3 emulates an NT4-type domain. So the NETBIOS version of the domain name (XX) is correct. The DNS name is would only be for an Active Directory type domain (Windows 200x or Samba 4 servers.) On 12/18/12 09:27, Alexandr Seidl wrote: Hi ... I have problem join win 8 pro to samba domain after patch registry join to domain name XX work OK bud join domain .YYY don't work windows send only DNS request to SRV record any Idea? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] (S4) Neither AXFR nor authoritative nameserving available?
Hello all, I'd like to have redundant DNS in our setup. But it seems that Samba 4 does not yet support AXFR with its internal DNS server. Alright, that's fine, so I figured I'd configure the system such that at the very least, a caching nameserver was sitting in front of it. However, that doesn't work; the caching nameserver (BIND 9) returns SERVFAIL, apparently because Samba 4 isn't setting the authoritative bit on its DNS responses. Is this a known issue, a configuration error on my part, or something entirely different altogether? Thanks, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Cannot get user level access to shares
I'm setting up a new samba server under CentOS6.3, samba-3.5.10-125.el6.x86_64, and am running into a strange problem I am unable to solve. There's actually a bunch of problems, but I think they can be solved once this particular issue is fixed. Samba is set up as a PDC for WinXP clients. The old samba server bit the dust and I had many problems trying to migrate. So I started from scratch with a very basic configuration, straight from the RHEL6 documentation (Primary Domain Controller (PDC) using tdbsam), but even with this setup, I keep running into the same issue. The logs (log level 2) are littered with lines like these: [2012/12/18 12:39:35.740861, 2] smbd/service.c:587(create_connection_server_info) guest user (from session setup) not permitted to access this share (MYID) [2012/12/18 12:39:35.740893, 1] smbd/service.c:678(make_connection_snum) create_connection_server_info failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED So, despite success login as MYID, samba only grants guest-level access to this share. One consequence is that software like Office cannot save to the share because it's in use by another user. I can fix this bit with various locking related options. In order to discount issues with other network services, I have created MYID and the corresponding home directory locally on the samba server. Yet, the issue persists. testparm output: Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC [global] workgroup = MYGROUP netbios name = SAMBA server string = Samba Server Version %v interfaces = lo, eth0, 10.20.11.131/24, 127.0.0.1 bind interfaces only = Yes log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd %u -n delete user script = /usr/sbin/userdel %u add group script = /usr/sbin/groupadd %g -n delete group script = /usr/sbin/groupdel %g delete user from group script = /usr/sbin/userdel %u %g add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -n -g machines -c Machines (%M) -M -d /nohome -s /bin/false %u domain logons = Yes preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = Yes hosts allow = 127., 10.20.11. cups options = raw posix locking = No [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No veto oplock files = /*.msf/Inbox/*.xls/*.csv/ browseable = No -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba4 and phpLdapAdmin
Hi, i'm using samba4.0.0 and phpLdapAdmin 1.2.2 in Debian Wheezy server. Can anyone point me a direction to create AD users using PLA? My installation has only samba3 template. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] static only wins server
Since there's only a couple of server systems on the network that actually need name resolution or to be seen via NetBIOS browsing. Is there any reason not to run a static only WINS server with just the information for those systems listed? If not, then how can one stop the other systems from registering themselves? Thanks, Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] static only wins server
If your windows clients use login scripts to map drives, then they don't need WINS at all, since they resolve hosts via DNS. However, if a client isn't using wins it will still use netbios browser to locate resource on the network.I am not sure if you can totally defeat this by pointing the windows clients to an inactive WINS server. If you don't have file and print sharing enable on the windows client that should prevent them from showing up a netbios resources. On 12/18/12 13:47, Chris Smith wrote: Since there's only a couple of server systems on the network that actually need name resolution or to be seen via NetBIOS browsing. Is there any reason not to run a static only WINS server with just the information for those systems listed? If not, then how can one stop the other systems from registering themselves? Thanks, Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] static only wins server
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Gaiseric Vandal gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote: If your windows clients use login scripts to map drives, then they don't need WINS at all, since they resolve hosts via DNS. I think that WINS is necessary for the clients to find the Domain Controller. However, if a client isn't using wins it will still use netbios browser to locate resource on the network.I am not sure if you can totally defeat this by pointing the windows clients to an inactive WINS server. I want the WINS server to be active - just read only. Clients will receive P-Node instructions (WINS only) from the DHCP server. If you don't have file and print sharing enable on the windows client that should prevent them from showing up a netbios resources. Many of the client systems will not be under management control. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] static only wins server
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 15:14 -0500, Chris Smith wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Gaiseric Vandal gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote: If your windows clients use login scripts to map drives, then they don't need WINS at all, since they resolve hosts via DNS. I think that WINS is necessary for the clients to find the Domain Controller. ??? With Active Directory I'm pretty sure that happens via a DNS query (or series of them). However, if a client isn't using wins it will still use netbios browser to locate resource on the network.I am not sure if you can totally defeat this by pointing the windows clients to an inactive WINS server. I want the WINS server to be active - just read only. Clients will receive P-Node instructions (WINS only) from the DHCP server. If you don't have file and print sharing enable on the windows client that should prevent them from showing up a netbios resources. Many of the client systems will not be under management control. -- Adam Tauno Williams GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] static only wins server
I'm not referring to Active Directory, the Domain Controller is a Samba 3 box. On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org wrote: ??? With Active Directory I'm pretty sure that happens via a DNS query (or series of them). -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba4 and phpLdapAdmin
Hi, My advice would be to steer clear of phpLdapAdmin with Samba4 AD. When I first setup my Samba4 DC I did install phpLdapAdmin and connected to the AD domain. Just browsing the directory produced some strange errors that made me rather nervous. I dared not to edit anything because it would probably break AD. I removed phpLdapAdmin. I was actually not surprised by this. Although MS say AD is LDAP compliant, the word 'compliant' is rather subjective. MS included 'other' things in AD and have done some things differently to a *normal* LDAP directory. Any tool used on AD has to be designed to work with AD. The best way to manage users in Samba4 is with the ADUC tool included with the MS RSAT pack. Install RSAT on a Windows client joined to the domain. It works beautifully. Regards, Stephen Jones Lloyd Systems Engineering On Wed, Dec 19, 2012, at 05:21 AM, Thiago Parolin wrote: Hi, i'm using samba4.0.0 and phpLdapAdmin 1.2.2 in Debian Wheezy server. Can anyone point me a direction to create AD users using PLA? My installation has only samba3 template. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] (no subject)
Hi, Actually I am working on a project in which we are migrating from 3.x to 4, so Please tell me the difference in versions and also give me information that how we can use active directory of 4.0 effectively as we are having CIFS and Kerberos feature in 3.x, And how this active directory can be helpful in our implementation. And I am also having a question as we are using 3.x so only because of active directory in 4.0 we should migrate from 3.x to 4.0 or is it having some more additional features that can be useful in future. Please reply as soon as possible. Nirmit Kansal ~~Disclaimer~~~ Information contained and transmitted by this e-mail is confidential and proprietary to iGATE and its affiliates and is intended for use only by the recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and you are requested to delete this e-mail immediately and notify the originator or mailad...@igate.com mailto:mailad...@igate.com. iGATE does not enter into any agreement with any party by e-mail. Any views expressed by an individual do not necessarily reflect the view of iGATE. iGATE is not responsible for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of information provided, through this email. The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses, which could damage your own computer system. While iGATE has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening an attachment. To know more about iGATE please visit www.igate.com http://www.igate.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba4 and phpLdapAdmin
Stephen, Thanks for sharing sage advice. I've used http://www.ldapadmin.org to manage my SAMBA3 PDCs ldap since 2005, an excellent tool. However when accessing SAMBA4 AD, the Directory started to misbehave. It was a test system so I blew it away assuming that something was incorrectly written to the ldb. Regards, Dewayne. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba4 and Exchange 2010
Hi, I have successfully installed the stable version of Samba4 with AD role on a Debian Weezy yesterday. I managed to join a Windows 7 workstation and a Windows 2008 Server to my domain but I can't install Exchange 2010 on that server, when I try to launch the Setup /PrepareSchema command to configure Active Directory the following message appears : The Domain Controller 'smb4.intra.loc' is running the 4.0.0 version of the operating system. Minimal requested version is 5.2 (3790) Service Pack 1. Is it possible to install Exchange 2010 in a Samba4 Active Directory environment ? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba4 and Exchange 2010
Install SOGo/SAMBA4/Openchange this will substitute Exchange: http://www.sogo.nu/ --- EDV Daniel Müller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 Tübingen Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 eMail: muel...@tropenklinik.de Internet: www.tropenklinik.de --- -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im Auftrag von Jaymzwise Jaymzwise Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Dezember 2012 08:26 An: samba@lists.samba.org Betreff: [Samba] Samba4 and Exchange 2010 Hi, I have successfully installed the stable version of Samba4 with AD role on a Debian Weezy yesterday. I managed to join a Windows 7 workstation and a Windows 2008 Server to my domain but I can't install Exchange 2010 on that server, when I try to launch the Setup /PrepareSchema command to configure Active Directory the following message appears : The Domain Controller 'smb4.intra.loc' is running the 4.0.0 version of the operating system. Minimal requested version is 5.2 (3790) Service Pack 1. Is it possible to install Exchange 2010 in a Samba4 Active Directory environment ? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
autobuild: intermittent test failure detected
The autobuild test system has detected an intermittent failing test in the current master tree. The autobuild log of the failure is available here: http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2012-12-18-0931/flakey.log The samba3 build logs are available here: http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2012-12-18-0931/samba3.stderr http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2012-12-18-0931/samba3.stdout The source4 build logs are available here: http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2012-12-18-0931/samba.stderr http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2012-12-18-0931/samba.stdout The top commit at the time of the failure was: commit d8461992dbc6005f02240cf1eae8a56ba4c55148 Author: Günther Deschner g...@samba.org Date: Tue Dec 11 23:53:22 2012 +0100 s4-rpc_server: use netlogon_creds_encrypt_samlogon(). Guenther Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner g...@samba.org Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org Autobuild-User(master): Günther Deschner g...@samba.org Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Dec 16 01:34:01 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-5-test updated
The branch, v3-5-test has been updated via 26a043a WHATSNEW: Start release notes for Samba 3.5.21. via f807043 VERSION: Bump version number up to 3.5.21. from 31292e6 WHATSNEW: Prepare release notes for Samba 3.5.20. http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-5-test - Log - commit 26a043a0997e199701a1bd72f91edc607471e700 Author: Karolin Seeger ksee...@samba.org Date: Tue Dec 18 10:51:35 2012 +0100 WHATSNEW: Start release notes for Samba 3.5.21. Karolin commit f80704321ffe22ed3a5dfab02e0ebaa1cc104c22 Author: Karolin Seeger ksee...@samba.org Date: Tue Dec 18 10:50:59 2012 +0100 VERSION: Bump version number up to 3.5.21. Karolin --- Summary of changes: WHATSNEW.txt| 45 +++-- source3/VERSION |2 +- 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Changeset truncated at 500 lines: diff --git a/WHATSNEW.txt b/WHATSNEW.txt index e2249fc..c96f46f 100644 --- a/WHATSNEW.txt +++ b/WHATSNEW.txt @@ -1,4 +1,45 @@ == + Release Notes for Samba 3.5.21 +, 2013 + == + + +This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.5. + +Major enhancements in Samba 3.5.21 include: + +o + +Changes since 3.5.19: +- + +o Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org + + +## +Reporting bugs Development Discussion +### + +Please discuss this release on the samba-technical mailing list or by +joining the #samba-technical IRC channel on irc.freenode.net. + +If you do report problems then please try to send high quality +feedback. If you don't provide vital information to help us track down +the problem then you will probably be ignored. All bug reports should +be filed under the Samba 3.5 product in the project's Bugzilla +database (https://bugzilla.samba.org/). + + +== +== Our Code, Our Bugs, Our Responsibility. +== The Samba Team +== + + +Release notes for older releases follow: + + + == Release Notes for Samba 3.5.20 December 17, 2012 == @@ -51,8 +92,8 @@ database (https://bugzilla.samba.org/). == -Release notes for older releases follow: - +-- + == Release Notes for Samba 3.5.19 diff --git a/source3/VERSION b/source3/VERSION index ff94b83..754ca85 100644 --- a/source3/VERSION +++ b/source3/VERSION @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ SAMBA_VERSION_MAJOR=3 SAMBA_VERSION_MINOR=5 -SAMBA_VERSION_RELEASE=20 +SAMBA_VERSION_RELEASE=21 # Bug fix releases use a letter for the patch revision # -- Samba Shared Repository
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-5-stable updated
The branch, v3-5-stable has been updated via 71dbced WHATSNEW: Start release notes for Samba 3.5.21. via 9466c43 VERSION: Bump version number up to 3.5.21. from 0c72376 WHATSNEW: Prepare release notes for Samba 3.5.20. http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-5-stable - Log - commit 71dbced7ea45a4e20209fd4208d63b99fb50705b Author: Karolin Seeger ksee...@samba.org Date: Tue Dec 18 10:51:35 2012 +0100 WHATSNEW: Start release notes for Samba 3.5.21. Karolin (cherry picked from commit 26a043a0997e199701a1bd72f91edc607471e700) commit 9466c434a47814f29cd8bd076f46175610578dbb Author: Karolin Seeger ksee...@samba.org Date: Tue Dec 18 10:50:59 2012 +0100 VERSION: Bump version number up to 3.5.21. Karolin (cherry picked from commit f80704321ffe22ed3a5dfab02e0ebaa1cc104c22) --- Summary of changes: WHATSNEW.txt| 45 +++-- source3/VERSION |2 +- 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Changeset truncated at 500 lines: diff --git a/WHATSNEW.txt b/WHATSNEW.txt index e2249fc..c96f46f 100644 --- a/WHATSNEW.txt +++ b/WHATSNEW.txt @@ -1,4 +1,45 @@ == + Release Notes for Samba 3.5.21 +, 2013 + == + + +This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.5. + +Major enhancements in Samba 3.5.21 include: + +o + +Changes since 3.5.19: +- + +o Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org + + +## +Reporting bugs Development Discussion +### + +Please discuss this release on the samba-technical mailing list or by +joining the #samba-technical IRC channel on irc.freenode.net. + +If you do report problems then please try to send high quality +feedback. If you don't provide vital information to help us track down +the problem then you will probably be ignored. All bug reports should +be filed under the Samba 3.5 product in the project's Bugzilla +database (https://bugzilla.samba.org/). + + +== +== Our Code, Our Bugs, Our Responsibility. +== The Samba Team +== + + +Release notes for older releases follow: + + + == Release Notes for Samba 3.5.20 December 17, 2012 == @@ -51,8 +92,8 @@ database (https://bugzilla.samba.org/). == -Release notes for older releases follow: - +-- + == Release Notes for Samba 3.5.19 diff --git a/source3/VERSION b/source3/VERSION index 8f64c98..bdf294e 100644 --- a/source3/VERSION +++ b/source3/VERSION @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ SAMBA_VERSION_MAJOR=3 SAMBA_VERSION_MINOR=5 -SAMBA_VERSION_RELEASE=20 +SAMBA_VERSION_RELEASE=21 # Bug fix releases use a letter for the patch revision # -- Samba Shared Repository
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
The branch, master has been updated
via 2148d86 Fix bug #9196 - defer_open is triggered multiple times on
the same request.
from d846199 s4-rpc_server: use netlogon_creds_encrypt_samlogon().
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit 2148d86c7a2facd6e128b753aef98722843af3e1
Author: Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org
Date: Fri Dec 14 08:39:26 2012 -0800
Fix bug #9196 - defer_open is triggered multiple times on the same request.
get_deferred_open_message_state_smb2() is buggy in that it is checking
the wrong things to determine if an open is in the deferred state.
It checks if (smb2req-async_te == NULL) which is incorrect,
as we're not always async in a deferred open - remove this.
It should check instead state-open_was_deferred as this
is explicity set to 'true' when an open is going deferred,
so add this check.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher me...@samba.org
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher me...@samba.org
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Dec 18 14:19:13 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
---
Summary of changes:
source3/smbd/smb2_create.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Changeset truncated at 500 lines:
diff --git a/source3/smbd/smb2_create.c b/source3/smbd/smb2_create.c
index 812d9db..21f2549 100644
--- a/source3/smbd/smb2_create.c
+++ b/source3/smbd/smb2_create.c
@@ -1133,9 +1133,6 @@ bool get_deferred_open_message_state_smb2(struct
smbd_smb2_request *smb2req,
if (!smb2req) {
return false;
}
- if (smb2req-async_te == NULL) {
- return false;
- }
req = smb2req-subreq;
if (!req) {
return false;
@@ -1144,6 +1141,9 @@ bool get_deferred_open_message_state_smb2(struct
smbd_smb2_request *smb2req,
if (!state) {
return false;
}
+ if (!state-open_was_deferred) {
+ return false;
+ }
if (p_request_time) {
*p_request_time = state-request_time;
}
--
Samba Shared Repository
autobuild: intermittent test failure detected
The autobuild test system has detected an intermittent failing test in the current master tree. The autobuild log of the failure is available here: http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2012-12-18-2330/flakey.log The samba3 build logs are available here: http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2012-12-18-2330/samba3.stderr http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2012-12-18-2330/samba3.stdout The source4 build logs are available here: http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2012-12-18-2330/samba.stderr http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2012-12-18-2330/samba.stdout The top commit at the time of the failure was: commit 2148d86c7a2facd6e128b753aef98722843af3e1 Author: Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org Date: Fri Dec 14 08:39:26 2012 -0800 Fix bug #9196 - defer_open is triggered multiple times on the same request. get_deferred_open_message_state_smb2() is buggy in that it is checking the wrong things to determine if an open is in the deferred state. It checks if (smb2req-async_te == NULL) which is incorrect, as we're not always async in a deferred open - remove this. It should check instead state-open_was_deferred as this is explicity set to 'true' when an open is going deferred, so add this check. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher me...@samba.org Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher me...@samba.org Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Dec 18 14:19:13 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
