Something weird...
I connected one notbook to another samba (v3.5.5) network. Logged in as
a local user on the notebook and guess what. The complete network
environment is shown.
The main difference between these two networks, apart form the version
number of smbd, is that the working network
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org writes:
There is no --fix option to samba-tool gpo aclcheck. What does
'samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck' give?
Sorry wrong cutpaste I mean:
samba-tool dbcheck --fix
The command you tell me give this result:
lp_load_ex: refreshing parameters
Mario Giammarco mgiammarco at gmail.com writes:
Thanks for hint, now I see that in ppa there is samba 4.0.3. I was pretty sure
that I have samba 4.0.3 but apparently ubuntu refused to upgrade it and I have
4.0.0.alpha!!
Sorry I checked better: it is 4.0.3.zentyal.
--
To unsubscribe
On 21/02/13 23:26, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 07:24:26PM +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Just a quick check here before I file a bug report. I've just
checked if I can use the recycle VFS object in Samba 4 like I do in
Samba 3 - and it seems that is not implemented yet. Should
Awesome i will try to replicate in my test environment.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Peter Beck pe...@datentraeger.li wrote:
Hi guys,
weehoo! Samba4 rocks ! Great work!
if someone is interested - I finally managed to replace a Windows DC
successfully.
(at least i hope so ;-)
this
This isn't exactly a Samba problem, but I am hoping the experts here can
help me.
I have been trying to get my OpenIndiana system to join a Samba4 domain and
I was running into multiple problems. So I decided to test against a true
Windows Server (2003) domain, to see if there is something wrong
Wouw!
And how do you handle the GPO and sysvol volumes? Did you copy them to the
samba sysvol?
I´ve been trying and it always fails in the fsmo transferring. Did you do
this on the Windows MMC?
2013/2/22 Sérgio Henrique ser...@gmail.com
Awesome i will try to replicate in my test environment.
You can try to find your record doing: (taking from the official how-to)
host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.samdom.example.com.
2013/2/22 Lee Allen l...@leecallen.com
This isn't exactly a Samba problem, but I am hoping the experts here can
help me.
I have been trying to get my OpenIndiana system to
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 13:11 +, Chris Lewis wrote:
Hello,
Today I tried to upgrade from samba 4.0.0 to 4.0.3 on my test environment.
I patched the source with the diffs patch-4.0.0-4.0.1.diffs,
patch-4.0.1-4.0.2.diffs, patch-4.0.2-4.0.3.diffs , then make, make install.
# samba-tool
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 09:09 -0800, Gregory Sloop wrote:
DE Originally I had a Win 2003 DC. I added a samba 4.0.0 DC to the
DE domain, allow full replication to take place and then transferred all
DE the roles to the samba 4.0.0 dc. Finally I removed the Windows DC from
DE the domain.
DE
I must add, that from the Windows client, if I go to the directories
where the eventvwr says there is a failure creating the folders, I can
create the folders just fine manually, so it is not really a permissions
issue, at least not when trying to use explorer to create the folders,
however
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 09:30 +, Mario Giammarco wrote:
Mario Giammarco mgiammarco at gmail.com writes:
Thanks for hint, now I see that in ppa there is samba 4.0.3. I was pretty
sure
that I have samba 4.0.3 but apparently ubuntu refused to upgrade it and I
have
4.0.0.alpha!!
On 22 February 2013 11:48, Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org wrote:
Indeed, if the domain originally came from windows, then
upgradeprovision should NOT be run. Indeed, I would have hoped that the
tool would detect this and would not attempt an upgrade, but clearly
this fails.
Ah. It might
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org writes:
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 09:30 +, Mario Giammarco wrote:
Sorry I checked better: it is 4.0.3.zentyal.
At this point due to other commitments I can't help you much more.
Perhaps be in contact with Zentyal to understand more how your package
That also fails:
lal...@oi.allenlan.net:~$ host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.allenlan.net.
Host _ldap._tcp.allenlan.net. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
lal...@oi.allenlan.net:~$ host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.allenlan.net.
Host _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.ALLENLAN.NET. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
I can manually add these
Federico Nan feder...@nantec.com.ar quatschte am Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at
08:36:56AM -0300:
Wouw!
And how do you handle the GPO and sysvol volumes? Did you copy them to the
samba sysvol?
I´ve been trying and it always fails in the fsmo transferring. Did you do
this on the Windows MMC?
Hi
Am 2013-02-22 08:36, schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013, 05:09:58 schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013, 04:18:33 schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
Am Montag, 18. Februar 2013, 20:16:15 schrieb Ray:
Hi,
I suppose this question must have been posted a hundred times,
Hi Sebastian,
If you run ps ax | grep smbd while samba is running and see running smbd
processes, then most (probably all even) vfs objects should run (including
recycle).
Ricky
On Feb 22, 2013 4:01 AM, Sebastian Arcus s...@open-t.co.uk wrote:
On 21/02/13 23:26, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu,
Maybe you can try to do a setup domain again.
2013/2/22 Lee Allen l...@leecallen.com
That also fails:
lal...@oi.allenlan.net:~$ host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.allenlan.net.
Host _ldap._tcp.allenlan.net. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
lal...@oi.allenlan.net:~$ host -t SRV
Hi,
My goal is to make use of samba 4 and freeradius to authenticate user to use
wifi network (WPA2 enterprise).
The setup is to setup Samba 4.0.3 in machine A and setup freeradius in machine
B.
By reading:
Document A: http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/beyond
Document B:
I did quite a bit more research on this. Everything I read says an AD DNS
should automatically set up those entries. I found a few trouble-shooting
documents that suggested checking them, but nothing indicating why they
might be wrong, and what to do about it.
I agree that tearing down the
I think he's seeing this with both S4 and WS2003 as a DC, so I don't know
that setting up the domain again will solve the problem. Provisioning a
domain on WS2003 (or S4 TBH) is a very simple process. It's hard to say
with such little info, but I'm guessing it's a client network configuration
- is
I Peter i had just one problem i am unable to replicate ForestDns and
DomainDns zones!? How do you manage to do that?
also dns recursive queries = yes its being ignored...
Thank you in advanced.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Peter Beck pe...@datentraeger.li wrote:
Federico Nan
Are you using kerberos to authenticate ?
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Sérgio Henrique ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Awesome i will try to replicate in my test environment.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Peter Beck pe...@datentraeger.li wrote:
Hi guys,
weehoo! Samba4 rocks ! Great work!
I'm in the process of setting up a samba file server, and I'd like to
set it up so users can authenticate with their Kerberos realm
credentials. It seems that every article I read wants me to bind the
thing to a domain, and authenticate that way. The only problem with that
is user accounts
I guess the comunication beetween MS AD and Samba4 is by kerberos, i have
copied the /opt/samba/private/krb5.conf to /etc after joined to domain
I have installed a windows server at 2003 forest level as PDC then
installed samba4.0.3
join domain but everytime i am getting problems with forest and
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:01:11AM +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Hi Jeremy. Thanks for the reply. Would that mean that it is not
possible to use the recycle bin in the ADS domain mode?
It's nothing to do with the ADS domain mode, it's to
do with what fileserver backend you're using.
smbd ==
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Diego Remolina
diego.remol...@physics.gatech.edu wrote:
I think a lot of your work was probably prior to RHEL 6.4, but have you
tried looking at their new SRPM for samba 4.0.0 and adapting it to 4.0.3?
Unfortunately somewhere between 4.0.0 and 4.0.3. they
On 2/22/2013 11:13, Sérgio Henrique wrote:
I guess the comunication beetween MS AD and Samba4 is by kerberos, i have
copied the /opt/samba/private/krb5.conf to /etc after joined to domain
I have installed a windows server at 2003 forest level as PDC then
installed samba4.0.3
join domain but
Touche. Although my goal is replication, not proxying.
- Original Message -
From: Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, 21 February 2013, 11:59
Subject: Re: [Samba] LDAP recommendations please
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 16:36 +, ray
Dustin C. Hatch admiraln...@gmail.com quatschte am Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at
12:31:05PM -0600:
On 2/22/2013 11:13, Sérgio Henrique wrote:
I guess the comunication beetween MS AD and Samba4 is by kerberos, i have
copied the /opt/samba/private/krb5.conf to /etc after joined to domain
I have
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 13:12 +, Dominic Evans wrote:
On 22 February 2013 11:48, Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org wrote:
Indeed, if the domain originally came from windows, then
upgradeprovision should NOT be run. Indeed, I would have hoped that the
tool would detect this and would not
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 12:53 +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Thanks Andrew. Will do. Just for my own understanding - is it still
possible to run Samba 4 as (just) a workgroup? If yes - does one just
specify security=user in smb.conf and still uses the samba binary - or
the smbd binary has
I too have been experiencing the same issues with my Samba server and
Windows 8. I am currently running Samba 4.0.3. My Windows 7 client's
profiles are synchronizing, but I am receiving that same error on my
Windows 8 machines. The user has full permissions over their roaming
profile directory, so
On 2/22/2013 15:22, Peter Beck wrote:
Dustin C. Hatch admiraln...@gmail.com quatschte am Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at
12:31:05PM -0600:
On 2/22/2013 11:13, Sérgio Henrique wrote:
I guess the comunication beetween MS AD and Samba4 is by kerberos, i have
copied the /opt/samba/private/krb5.conf to /etc
Hi!
I got my first Samba 4 system up and running. {No applause, just throw
money. Paper please, coins hurt}
It is just a home network of about a dozen or so boxes.
I have noticed that when I do a testparm, the result is not the same as
the file I created.
I'm fairly certain it isn't
On my network, I'm finding that if I run
host saffron
on any machine on my network, I see saffron's IPv4 address, but not
its IPv6 address. This is true regardless of which joined machine I
run. I'd like to figure out how to fix this...
For any other machine on the network,
host
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:17 PM, jimc jesmey...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I got my first Samba 4 system up and running. {No applause, just throw
money. Paper please, coins hurt}
It is just a home network of about a dozen or so boxes.
I have noticed that when I do a testparm, the result is not
Dustin C. Hatch admiraln...@gmail.com quatschte am Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at
05:58:51PM -0600:
On 2/22/2013 15:22, Peter Beck wrote:
Dustin C. Hatch admiraln...@gmail.com quatschte am Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at
12:31:05PM -0600:
My samba server works perfectly fine for all AD DC roles (including
The branch, master has been updated
via e4d85fa dsdb-descriptor: Avoid segfault copying an SD without an
owner or group
via 87db233 dsdb-descriptor: Spell out security descriptor flags as
constants
via a166a34 torture-drs: Fix comment in replica_sync test
via
The branch, master has been updated
via 6455ce5e4980a63d56ed30f7059869c8356c12ea (commit)
from 4f71dca8df19a63f198e2d6d59e605b49ec5e803 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=ctdb.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 240a552 build: use -fstack-protector if available
via d537d64 Revert wafbuild: use -Wstack-protector if available
via ac9620b build/autoconf: put ld check variable in quotes
from e4d85fa dsdb-descriptor: Avoid segfault copying
The branch, master has been updated
via 36da56e Make systemctl reference indirect in
packaging/NetworkManager/30-winbind-systemd
via 92b0871 s3-rpc_server: Make sure that fd is really closed on error.
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy a...@samba.org
via 3ca727b lib-util:
The autobuild test system has detected an intermittent failing test in
the current master tree.
The autobuild log of the failure is available here:
http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2013-02-23-0011/flakey.log
The samba3 build logs are available here:
44 matches
Mail list logo