On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 14:07 +0200, François Lafont wrote:
Hello,
Le 20/04/2013 20:00, Michael Wood a écrit :
As Andrew suggested it would be good if you could run it under
valgrind and reproduce the crash.
I don't know valgrind sorry. In spite of all, I have tried this:
On 26.4.2013 6:13, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 17:39 +0300, Pekka L.J. Jalkanen wrote:
By the way, is a kerberos keytab actually necessary to decrypt the
GSS-API packets in Wireshark? Samba Wiki
(https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Capture_Packets) doesn't say so (just
tells to
I'm having fun getting this pair to talk sweetly together.
So many setup pages around, I'm quite confused.
A new install of samba, clean, just added
a [shares] section
path = /share
read only = no
browseable = yes
valid users = @users
create mask = 0660
I need to hide the listing of files to multiple users, but only allow access to
the file if you know the exact path and filename of the file in the form of
\\server\share\filename.txt. I am using the hide unwriteable files = yes flag
to accomplish this and it works as expected with windows 7.
I had a test environment with a few hundreds of users using Windows 7 under
a samba 3 domain.
They had the registry tweaks required to join a samba 3 domain.
I followed the classicupgrade migration to samba 4 and everything seemed to
be ok.
In my scenario I have a DNS server different from the
Hi,
same problem here:
root@leela:~# valgrind samba -i -M single out 21
root@leela:~# cat out
==4450== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==4450== Copyright (C) 2002-2011, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==4450== Using Valgrind-3.7.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==4450==
Dave,
Perhaps provide the [global] section and posix permissions of /share.
I don't see any clues here.
Dale
On 04/26/2013 8:23 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
I'm having fun getting this pair to talk sweetly together.
So many setup pages around, I'm quite confused.
A new install of samba, clean,
On 25 April 2013 15:38, Tim Vangehugten timvangehug...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to load my signed certificate into samba4 ldap so the samba4
ldap would use it if a client connects to it? And if so, could someone
provide me with the details on howto do this or point me in the
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 19:47 +0200, sa...@nisx.de wrote:
Hi,
same problem here:
We need to know where that free is coming from, can you add
--num-callers=64?
eg
valgrind --num-callers=64 samba -i -M single out 21
root@leela:~# valgrind samba -i -M single out 21
root@leela:~# cat out
Hi,
Le 26/04/2013 11:38, Andrew Bartlett a écrit :
Can you try that again with:
valgrind samba -i -M single out 21
I'm not worried about memory leaks (they don't cause crashes), and
missing the '-' in front of -M probably means you didn't get the crash
in the log you gave.
Oops,
On 26 April 2013 19:40, Dale Schroeder d...@briannassaladdressing.com wrote:
Dave,
Perhaps provide the [global] section and posix permissions of /share. I
don't see any clues here.
Dale
[global]
workgroup = simpsons
server string = Samba Server Version %v
netbios
The branch, v3-6-test has been updated
via 544e41e WHATSNEW: Add changes since 3.6.13.
from 7441f3d docs: Fix bug 9809 -- missing entry in specfile
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-6-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-6-test has been updated
via 5aba70a WHATSNEW: Add some information on migrating printers.
from 544e41e WHATSNEW: Add changes since 3.6.13.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-6-test
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 8283fd0 smbd: Do not fetch the record in defer_open_done
via e13021e dbwrap: Allow dbwrap_record_watch_recv to not lock the
record
via a7e8034 smbd: We don't use DEFERRED_OPEN_ENTRY anymore
via 8da5a0f smbd: Remove unused
14 matches
Mail list logo
