On 6/3/2013 11:57 PM, Giedrius wrote:
Hi,
2013.06.04 04:16, David González Herrera - [DGHVoIP] rašė:
Hi,
Let's see if any of the questions gets answered or at least I get
ponte dto something that can help me.
I followed this wiki:
2013.06.04 09:10, David González Herrera - [DGHVoIP] rašė:
On 6/3/2013 11:57 PM, Giedrius wrote:
Hi,
2013.06.04 04:16, David González Herrera - [DGHVoIP] rašė:
Hi,
Let's see if any of the questions gets answered or at least I get
ponte dto something that can help me.
I followed this
On 6/4/2013 1:28 AM, Giedrius wrote:
2013.06.04 09:10, David González Herrera - [DGHVoIP] rašė:
On 6/3/2013 11:57 PM, Giedrius wrote:
Hi,
2013.06.04 04:16, David González Herrera - [DGHVoIP] rašė:
Hi,
Let's see if any of the questions gets answered or at least I get
ponte dto something that
Hi,
I'm trying to get an IMAP server to authenticate using Kerberos rather than
storing and sending passwords all over the place. I've tried to do this
following the instructions for setting up Apache SSO
(https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/beyond#Apache_Single_Sign-On) but am
unable to
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 06:41:33PM -0400, David Coppit wrote:
So you are creating files on the server side, access it from
the client side, remove it on the server side again and
create a new file server side under the same name?
No, This is much more serious. Please see the strace.txt
Do I also need rsync, when I use samba4 as an AD DC and Win 2008 R2 as a
backup domain controller?
Am 30.05.13 17:31, schrieb Marc Muehlfeld:
Hello Ulrich,
Am 30.05.2013 12:35, schrieb Ulrich Schneider:
As I read in the article listet at the and of this email there is no
sysvol
Hi all
I'm trying to import our bind dns data for our domain into samba4 using
sambatool. Unfortunately, our domain has lots of (unnecessary)
subdomains, but that's hard to revert after a long time. So I will have
to parse the bind data and do a zonecreate for each subdomain that comes
out
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up a samba (3.6.6, debian wheezy 64bit) member server on
a 2008R2 domain. I'd like to be able to specify the uidnumbers users get on
here in AD but I'm getting really erratic results.
I've tried changing various range options, and as far as I can tell it
works
@Giedrius
Not exactly, as I wrote in my other posts to mailing list, this is glibc's
nss dns resolvers' (libnss_dns.so) issue that is ignoring hostnames with
_ (*_*msdcs)
Which OS's does that affect?
@David, Is your nameserver (in /etc/resolv.conf) on dcA ip.to.dc.a and on
dcB ip.to.dc.b if so,
Greetings,
I made some search on Google regarding this matter and found many
diverse information, some dated back to 2004, and would like to update
and clarify this issue. The question is: what's the problem on
re-sharing a NFS filesystem with Samba?.
The only way I found to share a NFS
Le Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:35:33 -0300
Marcio Merlone marcio.merl...@a1.ind.br écrivait:
If such filesystem is used for write operations only by Samba and no
one else, neither the NFS server or other processes on Samba server,
would the nolock option on NFS or the re-sharing by Samba be an
issue?
Hi,
2013.06.04 16:35, Ricky Nance rašė:
@Giedrius
Not exactly, as I wrote in my other posts to mailing list, this
is glibc's nss dns resolvers' (libnss_dns.so) issue that is
ignoring hostnames with _ (*_*msdcs)
Which OS's does that affect?
I personally tested this on openSUSE 12.2 and 12.3
Am 04.06.2013 11:53, schrieb Ulrich Schneider:
Do I also need rsync, when I use samba4 as an AD DC and Win 2008 R2 as a
backup domain controller?
Yes (or something else), because Samba currently doesn't support SysVol
replication.
Regards,
Marc
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
On 6/4/2013 8:35 AM, Ricky Nance wrote:
@Giedrius
Not exactly, as I wrote in my other posts to mailing list, this is
glibc's nss dns resolvers' (libnss_dns.so) issue that is ignoring
hostnames with _ (*_*msdcs)
Which OS's does that affect?
PDC is Ubuntu 12.0.4
root@samba:~# cat
Em 04-06-2013 11:05, Emmanuel Florac escreveu:
Le Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:35:33 -0300
Marcio Merlone marcio.merl...@a1.ind.br écrivait:
If such filesystem is used for write operations only by Samba and no
one else, neither the NFS server or other processes on Samba server,
would the nolock option
I reverted back to 3.6.6 and everything works again. So, rewording my
original question, is winbind authentication against a Windows 2000 DC
deprecated and no longer supported by Samba?
Please note that the reporter of the bug has proposed a patch to get
this working again.
Thank you for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
LDAP Account Manager (LAM) 4.2 - June 4th, 2013
===
LAM is a web frontend for managing accounts stored in an LDAP directory.
Announcement:
- -
You can now manage Samba 4 entries
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 12:20 +0200, NOC wrote:
Hi all
I'm trying to import our bind dns data for our domain into samba4 using
sambatool. Unfortunately, our domain has lots of (unnecessary)
subdomains, but that's hard to revert after a long time. So I will have
to parse the bind data and
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 12:36 +0100, Paul Littlefield wrote:
On 31/05/13 12:25, Paul Littlefield wrote:
Workaround: put guid names in /etc/hosts if you experience this bug.
I don't believe it. That has fixed it.
No more WERR_BADFILE errors in /usr/local/samba/var/log.samba
Domain
On 6/4/2013 5:47 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 12:36 +0100, Paul Littlefield wrote:
On 31/05/13 12:25, Paul Littlefield wrote:
Workaround: put guid names in /etc/hosts if you experience this bug.
I don't believe it. That has fixed it.
No more WERR_BADFILE errors in
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 22:23 +0200, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
Hi Andrew,
please have a look at my uac branch - in particular to commit
b357e9377c698a20989c339d1459ed00a342cf2b.
Thanks, I'll autobuild those!
Tide,
Just to be doubly sure, can you confirm the attached patches fix your
Yes, it fixed it, user can be disabled from mail system now ( although it does
not save the same value as AD saved (0x82 - 0x202 in AD, 0x82 -
0x800202 in current patch) ).
Thank you guys!
-- Original --
From: Andrew Bartlettabart...@samba.org;
Date:
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 13:16 +0800, Tide wrote:
Yes, it fixed it, user can be disabled from mail system now ( although it
does not save the same value as AD saved (0x82 - 0x202 in AD, 0x82
- 0x800202 in current patch) ).
Thank you guys!
Thanks, that's in master now.
Matthias,
The branch, v3-6-test has been updated
via 577b2e5 Fix bug 9900: is_printer_published GUID retrieval
via d867da6 printing: explicitly clear PUBLISHED attribute
via c8e399b printing: use const in is_printer_published
from c5173ab s3-docs: Remove experimental label on
The branch, master has been updated
via 097a8c7 s4:winbind: don't leak libnet_context into the main event
context
from b238008 s3:lib/ctdb_packet use sys_send in packet_fd_write
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via 62e25dc Fix bug 9900: is_printer_published GUID retrieval
via 60bb8f9 printing: explicitly clear PUBLISHED attribute
from 6736784 dns: Delete dnsNode objects when they are empty
The branch, master has been updated
via 55add52 smbcquotas.c: fix a bug of -t
from 097a8c7 s4:winbind: don't leak libnet_context into the main event
context
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The autobuild test system has detected an intermittent failing test in
the current master tree.
The autobuild log of the failure is available here:
http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2013-06-04-1549/flakey.log
The samba3 build logs are available here:
The branch, master has been updated
via d1feccb tdb: change version to tdb-1.2.12
from 55add52 smbcquotas.c: fix a bug of -t
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The annotated tag, tdb-1.2.12 has been created
at e88be38520d8ec2c0af18897082bd881f0a3ee24 (tag)
tagging d1feccb35e987545f4ae8e3f4eb0b4fc741e7e7e (commit)
replaces tevent-0.9.18
tagged by Stefan Metzmacher
on Tue Jun 4 16:28:29 2013 +0200
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via ad383ac s3:smbd: explain parameters in call to
SMB_VFS_DURABLE_RECONNECT()
via 63ac88d s3:smbd: remove code duplication in smb2_create_send()
via e6beae4 s3:smbd: remove old comment about scavenger timer from
The branch, master has been updated
via 1a6eac2 s4:samldb LDB module - permit userAccountControl
modifications without acct. type
via 62ee2a5 s4:samldb LDB module - userAccountControl = 0 means
UF_NORMAL_ACCOUNT on add
from ad383ac s3:smbd: explain parameters in call to
32 matches
Mail list logo
