Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba
Mostly All the NAS Vendors that belong to the linux side have samba3 winbind running pointing in their config to ads: Ex.: security = ADS something like this.. winbind enum users = Yes winbind enum groups = Yes winbind use default domain = Yes winbind nested groups = Yes winbind separator = + But in the first run you have to talk to them. Now and then you can buy the nas with a possibility to join to your samba3 domain. If you haven' t tried you will never know :-) Good Luck Daniel --- EDV Daniel Müller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 Tübingen Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 eMail: muel...@tropenklinik.de Internet: www.tropenklinik.de --- -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im Auftrag von Gaiseric Vandal Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Juli 2013 18:44 An: samba@lists.samba.org Betreff: Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba On 07/11/13 12:29, Fernando Lozano wrote: Hi, what about the samba running on your NAS. I did a lot of NAS hacking pointing a running samba/winbind config of the vendor to my nt-style samba/ldap domain . But if you do so be aware you are loosing your support :-). So if you can change the samba on your NAS you are up and running. I don't have the NAS box yet. I wish advice on which one to buy based on compatibility with a Samba 3 PDC (or Samba 4 DC, or IPA). Vendors I talked to tell me it won't work, I'd have to use Microsoft AD. Knowing the Linux and Windows side (protocols, software) this doesn't make sense to me, I'm guessing the sales people I talked to simply doesn't know and doesn't want to learn. And it's not easy to tell the boss I'll buy a somewhat expensive box (for a small business) just to hack and see if it'll work the way I want. :-( It would help if you simply tell me which NAS you had success and which one was easier, out-of-the-box, or had to hack. []s, Fernando Lozano It seems common that vendors (esp the sales guys) assume you are running Windows 200x and AD.I think the logic is that none of our customers use linux so we won't support it. It becomes self-fulfilling when anyone wanting something besides the basic Windows AD support looks for other solutions. Getting samba to work sometimes requires fiddling with protocol versions, WINS and DNS. For example windows 7 won't work with Samba 3.x until you tweek the registry. You can probably put together a price-comparable equivalent of the Buffalo using a white-box PC tower and linux. You can even set up software raid. It is more likely to work the way you want than a NAS box. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba
I use a Netgear readynas1500 as a fileserver for my Samba3/ldap domain which I' ve just upgraded to AD and it works fine in both cases (lots of users, though with relatively few active connections). It runs a bog standard Samba3 + winbind member server (NT or ADS) as far as I can tell. Having said that, the 2 shortcomings I have found are with windows 7 clients... troubles doing offline files (there are bunch of tweaks, but none work perfectly) and it doesnt work too well with the libraries feature in win7 (it needs indexing o some sort that isn't povided by samba I think) BTW, would a Samba4 member server setup help with these issues? If it did, I'd upgrade even if it did invaidate warranty... cheers Jim On 11/07/2013 05:03, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote: Hi Cris, Hi there, Has anyone tried to configure a NAS server to authenticate users using a Samba PDC, or even a Samba4 DC (AD-compatible) or an IPA server? not in a while, but I have done a samba 3 DC This was not my question. I'm ok running samba 3 DCs. :-) Have you ever configured a NAS so it would authenticate users from your Samba DC and them serve SMB file shares (aka network drives) to Windows desktops? I'm evaluating replacing some Linux file server for a NAS product, but all them make me nervous when the vendor talks about Active Directory support and nothing else. if 3rd party support is your concern, why are you using fedora instead of RHEL? Are you trying to sell me RHEL subscriptions or help me with my question? ;-) Anything wrong about asking about Fedora on a Fedora list, or any server issue is forbidden for Fedora users? ;-) AFAIK it shouldn't matter, from a technical perspective, if the samba DC runs Fedora, Debian, Slackware, RHEL, SuSE, Ubuntu, Solaris, whatever. I am not talking about OS level FC drivers or iSCSI initiators. Either a NAS will be compatible with Samba3, Samba4, both or neither. This depends on the SMB and MSRPC features needed by the NAS, all them application level protocols, not kernel modules. If I'll need Red Hat support for managing this system is another, unrelated, question. If the NAS vendors state they suṕport RHEL, that's not que question either, as supporting RHEL could mean the RHEL linux kernel smbfs and cifsfs driver talks to the NAS, not the NAS talks to the Samba DC. Or else, RHEL support may mean just that the NAS talks NFS and so a RHEL machine can mount volumes from tne NAS. That's not what I want. Most times I see linux servers they are simply members of a MSAD domain, not the DC themselves. But mine are. All vendors I talked to assume MSAD, and don't know about Samba. :-( Anyway Fedora is my desktop system and development workstation. The DC in question runs RHEL. But if this works I can try someday using Fedora or CentOS with the same (or other) NAS. In theory, many NASes are Linux boxes running samba, so there shouldn't be a problem, except if the web admin interface won't support a samba DC setup and I won't have SSH access to configure the NAS samba myself a cheaper nas will probably use samba, but not all NASs do. there are several commercial SMB/CIFS implementation out there. At least iomega/lenovo/emc state their NAS runs Samba. And a lot of less know vendors also. I'll buy a single, cheap NAS, not a high end EMC rack full of boxes. :-) But... will any NAS you know work with a Samba DC, or else, using an IPA server? Or will they only work with Microsoft Windows Server AD? All vendors I contacted talk only about MS Active Directory. They don't even know about NT4-style domains, which would mean a Samba3 DC should work. Besides, AFAIK a Samba4 DC isn't supported by RHEL at all -- that's why I included IPA in my question -- I'd have to use Sernet packages for Samba4. Even then, Samba4 is very new, I don't know if a NAS implementation would accept it in place of a MSAD DC. Most vendors talk to me about vmware, exchange and sql server support. They offer me windows-only backup servers and the like. Some even offer me SAP R/3 agents, while my ERP is another one. They can only follow their standard script for windows shops. So I ask for the collective knowledge from the Fedora and Samba lists... can anyone tell me I tried this NAS and it worked? Or should I better forget about this and keep using cheap intel boxes as file servers? Am I the first linux sysadmin in the world who's considering to have a NAS replacing some file servers but keeping his samba DCs? []s, Fernando Lozano -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba
quote: I'm evaluating replacing some Linux file server for a NAS product, but all them make me nervous when the vendor talks about Active Directory support and nothing else. Its simple, this is a BAD thing tot do. But if you really want a nas. Get a synology. The best you can get, is my experiance. http://www.synology.com/index.php?lang=default or Just get a pc with 2 harddisks and install. http://www.freenas.org/ or if you want a ready setup for samba4 . get the sernet samba4 appliance. http://www.enterprisesamba.com/samba4app/ My advice, get or the synoligy of the samba4 app. personaly, get the samba4 appliance. get zarafa, and you have about the samba as Windows + exchange Im running samba 3 with zarafa now, and im in the process of upgradeing to samba4. Good luck. Louis -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: jimpot...@orange.net [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Namens Jim Potter Verzonden: vrijdag 12 juli 2013 8:44 Aan: samba@lists.samba.org Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba I use a Netgear readynas1500 as a fileserver for my Samba3/ldap domain which I' ve just upgraded to AD and it works fine in both cases (lots of users, though with relatively few active connections). It runs a bog standard Samba3 + winbind member server (NT or ADS) as far as I can tell. Having said that, the 2 shortcomings I have found are with windows 7 clients... troubles doing offline files (there are bunch of tweaks, but none work perfectly) and it doesnt work too well with the libraries feature in win7 (it needs indexing o some sort that isn't povided by samba I think) BTW, would a Samba4 member server setup help with these issues? If it did, I'd upgrade even if it did invaidate warranty... cheers Jim On 11/07/2013 05:03, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote: Hi Cris, Hi there, Has anyone tried to configure a NAS server to authenticate users using a Samba PDC, or even a Samba4 DC (AD-compatible) or an IPA server? not in a while, but I have done a samba 3 DC This was not my question. I'm ok running samba 3 DCs. :-) Have you ever configured a NAS so it would authenticate users from your Samba DC and them serve SMB file shares (aka network drives) to Windows desktops? I'm evaluating replacing some Linux file server for a NAS product, but all them make me nervous when the vendor talks about Active Directory support and nothing else. if 3rd party support is your concern, why are you using fedora instead of RHEL? Are you trying to sell me RHEL subscriptions or help me with my question? ;-) Anything wrong about asking about Fedora on a Fedora list, or any server issue is forbidden for Fedora users? ;-) AFAIK it shouldn't matter, from a technical perspective, if the samba DC runs Fedora, Debian, Slackware, RHEL, SuSE, Ubuntu, Solaris, whatever. I am not talking about OS level FC drivers or iSCSI initiators. Either a NAS will be compatible with Samba3, Samba4, both or neither. This depends on the SMB and MSRPC features needed by the NAS, all them application level protocols, not kernel modules. If I'll need Red Hat support for managing this system is another, unrelated, question. If the NAS vendors state they su???port RHEL, that's not que question either, as supporting RHEL could mean the RHEL linux kernel smbfs and cifsfs driver talks to the NAS, not the NAS talks to the Samba DC. Or else, RHEL support may mean just that the NAS talks NFS and so a RHEL machine can mount volumes from tne NAS. That's not what I want. Most times I see linux servers they are simply members of a MSAD domain, not the DC themselves. But mine are. All vendors I talked to assume MSAD, and don't know about Samba. :-( Anyway Fedora is my desktop system and development workstation. The DC in question runs RHEL. But if this works I can try someday using Fedora or CentOS with the same (or other) NAS. In theory, many NASes are Linux boxes running samba, so there shouldn't be a problem, except if the web admin interface won't support a samba DC setup and I won't have SSH access to configure the NAS samba myself a cheaper nas will probably use samba, but not all NASs do. there are several commercial SMB/CIFS implementation out there. At least iomega/lenovo/emc state their NAS runs Samba. And a lot of less know vendors also. I'll buy a single, cheap NAS, not a high end EMC rack full of boxes. :-) But... will any NAS you know work with a Samba DC, or else, using an IPA server? Or will they only work with Microsoft Windows Server AD? All vendors I contacted talk only about MS Active Directory. They don't even know about NT4-style domains, which would mean a Samba3 DC should work. Besides, AFAIK a Samba4 DC isn't supported by RHEL at all -- that's why I included IPA in my question -- I'd have to use Sernet packages for Samba4. Even then, Samba4 is very new, I don't know if a NAS
[Samba] removing dead samba4 dc
Hi, I have a small but live samba4 AD (pure samba4, no Windows servers). My secondary (the one that was added 2nd) DC has expired, so I need to remove it from the domain. However the traditional Windows mechanism for doing this (deleting the entry from ADUC) doesn't work. I'm not sure if this was supposed to work, but the error I get is: Windows cannot delete object LDAP://primarydcaddress/CN=2nddcname,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=orgname,DC=tld because: The specified module could not be found. My guess is that method is not supposed to work. So given that I can't run a samba-tool demote (the server I wish to demote is not running), how do I remove it as a DC? Thanks, Tom. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] domain RODC fails with default provisioning
Sure. However, notice that it was caused by an incorrect libdefaults entry in krb5.conf (wrote bdefaults] instead of [libdefaults]). I've uploaded the log on pastebin: http://pastebin.com/sP8VNXQ5 On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org wrote: On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 17:27 +0200, Andreas Calvo wrote: We're evaluating joining another samba domain controller in read-only mode. With a default provisioning, when running the samba-tool domain RODC, it fails with the following error: ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb: ldb_asprintf/set_errstring: NULL Base DN invalid for a base search ldb_wrap open of hklm.ldb ldb: start ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-start_transaction ldb: start ldb transaction error: (null) ldb: ldb_trace_request: ADD dn: @ATTRIBUTES changetype: add key: CASE_INSENSITIVE value: CASE_INSENSITIVE control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-add ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-prepare_commit ldb: commit ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-end_transaction Key 'key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE Key 'key=Microsoft,key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=Microsoft,key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE Key 'key=Windows NT,key=Microsoft,key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=Windows NT,key=Microsoft,key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE Key 'key=CurrentVersion,key=Windows NT,key=Microsoft,key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=CurrentVersion,key=Windows NT,key=Microsoft,key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE About to write CurrentVersion with type (null), length 3: 6.1 Key 'key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE Key 'key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE Key 'key=Control,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=Control,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE Key 'key=ProductOptions,key=Control,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=ProductOptions,key=Control,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE About to write ProductType with type (null), length 8: LanmanNT Key 'key=Print,key=Control,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=Print,key=Control,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE Key 'key=Terminal Server,key=Control,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=Terminal Server,key=Control,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE Key 'key=Services,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=Services,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE Key 'key=Netlogon,key=Services,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=Netlogon,key=Services,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE Key 'key=Parameters,key=Netlogon,key=Services,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=Parameters,key=Netlogon,key=Services,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE About to write RefusePasswordChange with type dword, length 8: Key 'key=Alerter,key=Services,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=Alerter,key=Services,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE Key 'key=Parameters,key=Alerter,key=Services,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=Parameters,key=Alerter,key=Services,key=CurrentControlSet,key=SYSTEM,hive=NONE lpcfg_servicenumber: couldn't find ldb lpcfg_servicenumber: couldn't find ldb lpcfg_servicenumber: couldn't find ldb lpcfg_servicenumber: couldn't find ldb partition_metadata: Migrating partition metadata krb5_init_context failed (Invalid argument) smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument) talloc: access after free error - first free may be at @ �3 Bad talloc magic value - access after free Aborted Is there something special to be done prior to the domain join command? Can you re-run this under valgrind? While krb5_init_context should not fail (I did see your reply), it also shouldn't cause a crash, and we can at least fix that much. Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- Atentamente, Andreas Calvo -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba limitation to concurrent open files
Can Samba handle in the range of 1million to 3 millions concurrently open files? If so, then from which Samba version onwards? Does it have any benchmarking results on maximum number of open files that Samba can have concurrently? Any reply to this question is highly appreciated. Thanks in Advance Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba limitation to concurrent open files
On 12-07-2013 12:55, Santosh Patnaik wrote: Can Samba handle in the range of 1million to 3 millions concurrently open files? If so, then from which Samba version onwards? Does it have any benchmarking results on maximum number of open files that Samba can have concurrently? Any reply to this question is highly appreciated. Thanks in Advance Santosh http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch11.html says: max open files numeric Limits number of open files to be below Unix limits. 1 Global If the default value is 1 and you want it to be 100-300 times bigger? I see nothing mentioned in de docs about bigger values, just that is need to be below 'unix limits' ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba limitation to concurrent open files
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 01:05:24PM +0200, Luuk wrote: On 12-07-2013 12:55, Santosh Patnaik wrote: Can Samba handle in the range of 1million to 3 millions concurrently open files? If so, then from which Samba version onwards? Does it have any benchmarking results on maximum number of open files that Samba can have concurrently? Any reply to this question is highly appreciated. Thanks in Advance Santosh http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch11.html says: max open files numeric Limits number of open files to be below Unix limits. 1 Global If the default value is 1 and you want it to be 100-300 times bigger? I see nothing mentioned in de docs about bigger values, just that is need to be below 'unix limits' ;) Well, your ulimit should be high enough ;-) Volker -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: +49-551-37-0, fax: +49-551-37-9 AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kont...@sernet.de -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba limitation to concurrent open files
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 04:25:05PM +0530, Santosh Patnaik wrote: Can Samba handle in the range of 1million to 3 millions concurrently open files? If so, then from which Samba version onwards? Is this per connection? How many clients connect to that system? If you are using SMB1, the protocol has a 16-bit field for file IDs, this effectively limits the maximum number of files to 65536. In the real world it will be a bit less. With SMB2, there's no such limitation, but I don't know where people have pushed this so far. Does it have any benchmarking results on maximum number of open files that Samba can have concurrently? Not really. Do you have a bit more information about your workload, so that we can test this and lift limits? Thanks, Volker -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: +49-551-37-0, fax: +49-551-37-9 AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kont...@sernet.de -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] no log on servers on ubuntu clients (Samba4)
Hi All, I need some help about these errors: 1). samba version 4.0.7 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2012 [2013/07/12 10:57:36, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:475(binary_smbd_main) samba: using 'standard' process model [2013/07/12 10:57:37, 1] ../source4/auth/gensec/gensec_gssapi.c:339(gensec_gssapi_client_start) Could not determine hostname for target computer, cannot use kerberos [2013/07/12 10:57:37, 1] ../source4/auth/gensec/gensec_gssapi.c:339(gensec_gssapi_client_start) Could not determine hostname for target computer, cannot use kerberos [2013/07/12 12:00:55, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:72(fault_report) === [2013/07/12 12:00:55, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:73(fault_report) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 2264 (4.0.7) Please read the Trouble-Shooting section of the Samba HOWTO [2013/07/12 12:00:55, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:75(fault_report) === [2013/07/12 12:00:55, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:144(smb_panic_default) PANIC: internal error [2013/07/12 13:27:55, 1] ../source4/dsdb/kcc/kcc_deleted.c:105(kccsrv_check_deleted) Doing a full scan on DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=home,DC=net and looking for deleted object [2013/07/12 13:27:55, 1] ../source4/dsdb/kcc/kcc_deleted.c:105(kccsrv_check_deleted) Doing a full scan on DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=home,DC=net and looking for deleted object [2013/07/12 13:27:55, 1] ../source4/dsdb/kcc/kcc_deleted.c:105(kccsrv_check_deleted) Doing a full scan on CN=Configuration,DC=home,DC=net and looking for deleted object [2013/07/12 13:27:55, 1] ../source4/dsdb/kcc/kcc_deleted.c:105(kccsrv_check_deleted) Doing a full scan on DC=home,DC=net and looking for deleted object [2013/07/12 13:37:18, 1] ../source4/dns_server/dns_query.c:521(handle_tkey) Tkey handshake completed [2013/07/12 13:37:18, 1] ../source4/dns_server/dns_update.c:672(handle_updates) update count is 2 After restart of the server it goes again... 2.) I cannot login with lightdm (ubuntu 12.04) to my samba4 server. [no log on servers]??? I'm waiting about 5 or 7 min, then I can log without problems It's every day! wbinfo -u(-g) getent passwd (groups) lists all groups and users. Thanks, Alexander -- View this message in context: http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/no-log-on-servers-on-ubuntu-clients-Samba4-tp4651010.html Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] 3.5.6 to 3.6.6: session setup failed
Hi, I think that someone has the solution for my problem! ;) After i did the upgrade process in a samba server, from debian squeeze to wheezy, the new samba version (3.6.6) is not working. Searching on web, there are many causes for this error, and i dont know what is mine. I can't connect with smbclient -L host -U ldapuser, that give me error session setup failed: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL How can i fix this? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] 3.5.6 to 3.6.6: session setup failed
Does pdbedit -Lv still show users? You want to verify that samba is able to access LDAP. On 07/12/13 08:51, Thiago Parolin wrote: Hi, I think that someone has the solution for my problem! ;) After i did the upgrade process in a samba server, from debian squeeze to wheezy, the new samba version (3.6.6) is not working. Searching on web, there are many causes for this error, and i dont know what is mine. I can't connect with smbclient -L host -U ldapuser, that give me error session setup failed: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL How can i fix this? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] oLschema2ldif segfault
So I changed the syntax to 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 so I could process the schema... Now I'd like to manually edit the resultant LDIF so that I can create binary objects Where can I find the attributSyntax and oMSyntax for 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.5 (binary objects)? Thanks! - Original Message - From: Bo Kersey b...@vircio.com To: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 7:22:48 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] oLschema2ldif segfault Andrew, So it is the problem with the tool and I should be able to attributes that are binary to the LDIF manually? Thanks! Bo - Original Message - From: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org To: Bo Kersey b...@vircio.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-techni...@samba.org Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 9:09:32 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] oLschema2ldif segfault On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:11 -0500, Bo Kersey wrote: I'm seeing a oLschema2ldif segfault when it comes across attributetypes with syntax '1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.5' that is a BINARY attribute. Is this by design? Can I store binary attributes in samba4 ldap? We need to remove this tool, and someone needs to write a replacement in python. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba
With Samba 3.x (I think it was samba 3.4.x when we started deploying Windows 7) I found that offline folders on Windows 7 broke offline authentication. On 07/12/13 02:43, Jim Potter wrote: I use a Netgear readynas1500 as a fileserver for my Samba3/ldap domain which I' ve just upgraded to AD and it works fine in both cases (lots of users, though with relatively few active connections). It runs a bog standard Samba3 + winbind member server (NT or ADS) as far as I can tell. Having said that, the 2 shortcomings I have found are with windows 7 clients... troubles doing offline files (there are bunch of tweaks, but none work perfectly) and it doesnt work too well with the libraries feature in win7 (it needs indexing o some sort that isn't povided by samba I think) BTW, would a Samba4 member server setup help with these issues? If it did, I'd upgrade even if it did invaidate warranty... cheers Jim On 11/07/2013 05:03, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote: Hi Cris, Hi there, Has anyone tried to configure a NAS server to authenticate users using a Samba PDC, or even a Samba4 DC (AD-compatible) or an IPA server? not in a while, but I have done a samba 3 DC This was not my question. I'm ok running samba 3 DCs. :-) Have you ever configured a NAS so it would authenticate users from your Samba DC and them serve SMB file shares (aka network drives) to Windows desktops? I'm evaluating replacing some Linux file server for a NAS product, but all them make me nervous when the vendor talks about Active Directory support and nothing else. if 3rd party support is your concern, why are you using fedora instead of RHEL? Are you trying to sell me RHEL subscriptions or help me with my question? ;-) Anything wrong about asking about Fedora on a Fedora list, or any server issue is forbidden for Fedora users? ;-) AFAIK it shouldn't matter, from a technical perspective, if the samba DC runs Fedora, Debian, Slackware, RHEL, SuSE, Ubuntu, Solaris, whatever. I am not talking about OS level FC drivers or iSCSI initiators. Either a NAS will be compatible with Samba3, Samba4, both or neither. This depends on the SMB and MSRPC features needed by the NAS, all them application level protocols, not kernel modules. If I'll need Red Hat support for managing this system is another, unrelated, question. If the NAS vendors state they suṕport RHEL, that's not que question either, as supporting RHEL could mean the RHEL linux kernel smbfs and cifsfs driver talks to the NAS, not the NAS talks to the Samba DC. Or else, RHEL support may mean just that the NAS talks NFS and so a RHEL machine can mount volumes from tne NAS. That's not what I want. Most times I see linux servers they are simply members of a MSAD domain, not the DC themselves. But mine are. All vendors I talked to assume MSAD, and don't know about Samba. :-( Anyway Fedora is my desktop system and development workstation. The DC in question runs RHEL. But if this works I can try someday using Fedora or CentOS with the same (or other) NAS. In theory, many NASes are Linux boxes running samba, so there shouldn't be a problem, except if the web admin interface won't support a samba DC setup and I won't have SSH access to configure the NAS samba myself a cheaper nas will probably use samba, but not all NASs do. there are several commercial SMB/CIFS implementation out there. At least iomega/lenovo/emc state their NAS runs Samba. And a lot of less know vendors also. I'll buy a single, cheap NAS, not a high end EMC rack full of boxes. :-) But... will any NAS you know work with a Samba DC, or else, using an IPA server? Or will they only work with Microsoft Windows Server AD? All vendors I contacted talk only about MS Active Directory. They don't even know about NT4-style domains, which would mean a Samba3 DC should work. Besides, AFAIK a Samba4 DC isn't supported by RHEL at all -- that's why I included IPA in my question -- I'd have to use Sernet packages for Samba4. Even then, Samba4 is very new, I don't know if a NAS implementation would accept it in place of a MSAD DC. Most vendors talk to me about vmware, exchange and sql server support. They offer me windows-only backup servers and the like. Some even offer me SAP R/3 agents, while my ERP is another one. They can only follow their standard script for windows shops. So I ask for the collective knowledge from the Fedora and Samba lists... can anyone tell me I tried this NAS and it worked? Or should I better forget about this and keep using cheap intel boxes as file servers? Am I the first linux sysadmin in the world who's considering to have a NAS replacing some file servers but keeping his samba DCs? []s, Fernando Lozano -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba
Hi, Its simple, this is a BAD thing tot do. But if you really want a nas. As a technician I can agree, but I ceased trying to explain to management. Hey, we must help hardware vendor personal have a living ;-) and they help us put more expertise areas in our own resume. ;-))) Get a synology. The best you can get, is my experiance. Thanks a lot. I hope not only best as a NAS but also easy to setup as a member server for a samba 3 or 4 domain, right? Just get a pc with 2 harddisks and install. http://www.freenas.org/ Risking being off-topic on this list, many people told me not to use freenas because it was unmantained. Do you actually use it, follow the project closely, or just heard about it? personaly, get the samba4 appliance. I have to use my RHEL subscriptions ;-) Will use sernet packages when I get to upgrade to samba4. get zarafa, and you have about the samba as Windows + exchange Already have Zimbra. Someday I'll research about integrating Zimbra LDAP to Samba 4 LDAP. Won't try with Samba 3 because I hope to upgrade to samba4 this year. []s, Fernando Lozano -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba 4 domain members
Hi there, I would like to setup a Samba 4 member server to act as a separate fileserver within my Samba 4 domain. Does anyone have any recommendations for this setup? I've tried to create one following this: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/Domain_Member Which seems to work ok until I try to change any permission on any shares (or anything within the shares). I then get access denied errors. Obviously, this is unworkable as a solution as I need to set permissions. Any help much appreciated. Thanks, Chris. -- ACS (Alavoine Computer Services Ltd) Chris Alavoine mob +44 (0)7724 710 730 www.alavoinecs.co.uk http://twitter.com/#!/alavoinecs http://www.linkedin.com/pub/chris-alavoine/39/606/192 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] About NAS versus Samba
Hi Andrew, I work on a NAS product myself, and at this vendor and my previous vendor Samba 4.0 as an AD DC was all I ever needed to use to test the AD integration features of the NAS. Thanks, Andrew Bartlett Please tell me which product this is, so I can contact the local reseller. :-) You can send me in pvt if you think it would not be ethical to advertise your employee on the list. Sales people here (and their technical consultants) don't know / don't care about Samba. Every time I ask about samba compatibility they try to sell me Windows and VmWare licenses. They even lie trying to make my employee buy those licenses and ditch Linux altogether. I am only saved because of some previous incidents where I told my boss either they are lying or they don't know, showing technical references from vendors themselves and standards bodies, but was overruled. Later my boss found I was right the had way: products didn't worked as expected, company lost money. Most non-IT people, even many IT people, wrongly believe the vendor people should be the better experts and so any conflict of opinion they should be right. When it fails, the IT manager or the business area manager hide it, so they don't take blame for the wrong decision consequences. :-( If I someone tell me this product works I can by knowing if something bad happens it's something I can solve. Sometimes the management interface for a product won't let you do things the embebed software could do, so I don't want to risk a product without someone telling me this one worked for me. []s, Fernando Lozano -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 4 domain members
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 15:21 +0100, Chris Alavoine wrote: Hi there, I would like to setup a Samba 4 member server to act as a separate fileserver within my Samba 4 domain. Does anyone have any recommendations for this setup? I've tried to create one following this: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/Domain_Member Which seems to work ok until I try to change any permission on any shares (or anything within the shares). I then get access denied errors. Obviously, this is unworkable as a solution as I need to set permissions. Hi Give us an example of a share that's working. Then, what you change within it and what permissions you change to get the 'access denied'. Which version have you installed? Cheers, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] 3.5.6 to 3.6.6: session setup failed
if i do: smbclient -L 127.0.0.1 -U%, the resources are showed, but with smbclient -L 127.0.0.1 -U ldapuser, i get : session setup failed: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL the samba log says: [2013/07/12 14:17:28.607965, 0] auth/check_samsec.c:491(check_sam_security) check_sam_security: make_server_info_sam() failed with 'NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL' 2013/7/12 Thiago Parolin tlparo...@gmail.com the pdbedit -Lv shows: sid S-xx.-3024 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3018 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3022 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3026 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3030 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3032 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3034 does not belong to our domain (i think) the comunication with ldap is ok. (ldapsearch, getent passwd, group..). deleted sambadomain in ldap tree, then restarted the samba service to recreate the entries, and all these process is ok. the output in samba server (used for printer): net getdomainsid SID for local machine SPSI is: S-1-5-21-380638 SID for domain PSI is: S-1-5-21-272.099 the samba in ldap server: net getdomainsid is the same for SPSI above. pdbedit -Lv userldap shows: User SID: S-1-5-21-380638-3432 Primary Group SID: S-1-5-21-272.099-513 the samba log says: [2013/07/12 14:17:28.607965, 0] auth/check_samsec.c:491(check_sam_security) check_sam_security: make_server_info_sam() failed with 'NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL' 2013/7/12 Gaiseric Vandal gaiseric.van...@gmail.com Does pdbedit -Lv still show users? You want to verify that samba is able to access LDAP. On 07/12/13 08:51, Thiago Parolin wrote: Hi, I think that someone has the solution for my problem! ;) After i did the upgrade process in a samba server, from debian squeeze to wheezy, the new samba version (3.6.6) is not working. Searching on web, there are many causes for this error, and i dont know what is mine. I can't connect with smbclient -L host -U ldapuser, that give me error session setup failed: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL How can i fix this? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/**mailman/options/sambahttps://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Share configuration between subdomains
Hello everyone! In my enviroment, I have an AD Domain Controler where some samba server are connected. Look the domain tree. LOCAL SUBDOMAIN1 SUBDOMAIN2 SUBDOMAIN3 SUBDOMAIN4 I have a samba server included in SUBDOMAIN2.LOCAL and users from SUBDOMAIN4.LOCAL need permission to access share on SUBDOMAIN2.LOCAL I have been searching in google but nothing could help me. Best regards, -- Túlio Henrique A. dos Santos LPI3-Certificate Linux User #454598 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] 3.5.6 to 3.6.6: session setup failed
I've been trying many things, and one of them was reinstall samba for print server. After reinstall, i set the SID for print server to the same SID for samba's ldap server. Now, when i type pdbedit -Lv in print server, i get all users from my ldap tree. the command smbclient -L 127.0.0.1 -U ldapuser, now shows all resources normally, but (there are always a but) when i try to print, i got : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED opening remote spool Página_de_teste. Anyone can help me with this? 2013/7/12 Thiago Parolin tlparo...@gmail.com if i do: smbclient -L 127.0.0.1 -U%, the resources are showed, but with smbclient -L 127.0.0.1 -U ldapuser, i get : session setup failed: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL the samba log says: [2013/07/12 14:17:28.607965, 0] auth/check_samsec.c:491(check_sam_security) check_sam_security: make_server_info_sam() failed with 'NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL' 2013/7/12 Thiago Parolin tlparo...@gmail.com the pdbedit -Lv shows: sid S-xx.-3024 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3018 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3022 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3026 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3030 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3032 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3034 does not belong to our domain (i think) the comunication with ldap is ok. (ldapsearch, getent passwd, group..). deleted sambadomain in ldap tree, then restarted the samba service to recreate the entries, and all these process is ok. the output in samba server (used for printer): net getdomainsid SID for local machine SPSI is: S-1-5-21-380638 SID for domain PSI is: S-1-5-21-272.099 the samba in ldap server: net getdomainsid is the same for SPSI above. pdbedit -Lv userldap shows: User SID: S-1-5-21-380638-3432 Primary Group SID: S-1-5-21-272.099-513 the samba log says: [2013/07/12 14:17:28.607965, 0] auth/check_samsec.c:491(check_sam_security) check_sam_security: make_server_info_sam() failed with 'NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL' 2013/7/12 Gaiseric Vandal gaiseric.van...@gmail.com Does pdbedit -Lv still show users? You want to verify that samba is able to access LDAP. On 07/12/13 08:51, Thiago Parolin wrote: Hi, I think that someone has the solution for my problem! ;) After i did the upgrade process in a samba server, from debian squeeze to wheezy, the new samba version (3.6.6) is not working. Searching on web, there are many causes for this error, and i dont know what is mine. I can't connect with smbclient -L host -U ldapuser, that give me error session setup failed: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL How can i fix this? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/**mailman/options/sambahttps://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] 3.5.6 to 3.6.6: session setup failed
Solved! My steps: reinstall samba on print server, without erase smb.conf. set sid for print server the same for ldap/samba server. after this, to fix the error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED opening remote spool, i set in smb.conf printer section use client driver = yes now, printer is working again!! thanks. 2013/7/12 Thiago Parolin tlparo...@gmail.com I've been trying many things, and one of them was reinstall samba for print server. After reinstall, i set the SID for print server to the same SID for samba's ldap server. Now, when i type pdbedit -Lv in print server, i get all users from my ldap tree. the command smbclient -L 127.0.0.1 -U ldapuser, now shows all resources normally, but (there are always a but) when i try to print, i got : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED opening remote spool Página_de_teste. Anyone can help me with this? 2013/7/12 Thiago Parolin tlparo...@gmail.com if i do: smbclient -L 127.0.0.1 -U%, the resources are showed, but with smbclient -L 127.0.0.1 -U ldapuser, i get : session setup failed: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL the samba log says: [2013/07/12 14:17:28.607965, 0] auth/check_samsec.c:491(check_sam_security) check_sam_security: make_server_info_sam() failed with 'NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL' 2013/7/12 Thiago Parolin tlparo...@gmail.com the pdbedit -Lv shows: sid S-xx.-3024 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3018 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3022 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3026 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3030 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3032 does not belong to our domain sid S-xx.-3034 does not belong to our domain (i think) the comunication with ldap is ok. (ldapsearch, getent passwd, group..). deleted sambadomain in ldap tree, then restarted the samba service to recreate the entries, and all these process is ok. the output in samba server (used for printer): net getdomainsid SID for local machine SPSI is: S-1-5-21-380638 SID for domain PSI is: S-1-5-21-272.099 the samba in ldap server: net getdomainsid is the same for SPSI above. pdbedit -Lv userldap shows: User SID: S-1-5-21-380638-3432 Primary Group SID: S-1-5-21-272.099-513 the samba log says: [2013/07/12 14:17:28.607965, 0] auth/check_samsec.c:491(check_sam_security) check_sam_security: make_server_info_sam() failed with 'NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL' 2013/7/12 Gaiseric Vandal gaiseric.van...@gmail.com Does pdbedit -Lv still show users? You want to verify that samba is able to access LDAP. On 07/12/13 08:51, Thiago Parolin wrote: Hi, I think that someone has the solution for my problem! ;) After i did the upgrade process in a samba server, from debian squeeze to wheezy, the new samba version (3.6.6) is not working. Searching on web, there are many causes for this error, and i dont know what is mine. I can't connect with smbclient -L host -U ldapuser, that give me error session setup failed: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL How can i fix this? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/**mailman/options/sambahttps://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Administrative users on domain
Back in January we upgraded/moved our domain from an old install of samba and openldap to a newer version (samba 3.5.10 and openldap 2.4.23) while also moving our domain to a new name. On the old domain, which was setup before I got here, our IT section was in an ldap group that allowed us to join PC's to the domain and when the prompt came up in windows to install software we could log in as ourselves. However that is not the case on the new domain and I cannot figure out how to set that back up. I have looked at the docs on samba rights (http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/rights.html) but it seems I am missing something since when I type: net rpc rights grant 'MDAH\Domain Admins' SeMachineAccountPrivilege -S enterprise -U superusername it returns: Failed to grant privileges for MDAH\Domain Admins (NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER) superusername is our superuser account that we have to currently type in to join machines to join the domain. However when installing software we have to log in as local administrator or do a MACHINENAME\Administrator and it's password to install software. Any pointers? -- Donny B. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Unable to connect to Samba server, but it shows on the network
Being Fedora, 1st check selinux configuration: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Troubleshooting Dale On 07/11/2013 9:47 PM, renito73 Михаил wrote: Hello friends I am trying to setup Samba on my Fedora 19 installation, but it does not work... although smbclient -L myserver shows my shares, I can't access any of them from other computers and even from the same server, it returns an error that could not connect to to the server... My very simple configuration is this (my computer has fixed IP) [global] workgroup = MYGROUPNAME server string = Samba Server Version %v # log files split per-machine: log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m # maximum size of 50KB per log file, then rotate: max log size = 50 security = user passdb backend = tdbsam load printers = yes cups options = raw [tmp] comment = temporal files path = /tmp public = yes writable = yes printable = no [mp3] comment = my data files path = /mydatafiles public = yes writable = no printable = no I start the service by running # smbd -D # nmbd -D then the logs show: log.nmbd: - [2013/07/11 21:11:47, 0] ../source3/nmbd/nmbd.c:883(main) nmbd version 4.0.7 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2012 [2013/07/11 21:12:20, 0] ../source3/nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:397(become_local_master_stage2) * Samba name server MYSERVER is now a local master browser for workgroup MYGROUPNAME on subnet 192.168.1.20 * log.smbd: -[2013/07/11 21:11:45, 0] ../source3/smbd/server.c:1200(main) smbd version 4.0.7 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2012 When I try: # smbclient -L myserver (the name of my computer) Anonymous login successful Domain=[MYGROUPNAME] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.0.7] Sharename Type Comment - --- tmp Disk temporal files mp3 Disk mp3 music IPC$IPC IPC Service (Samba Server Version 4.0.7) Anonymous login successful Domain=[SORCERY] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.0.7] Server Comment ---- MYSERVER Samba Server Version 4.0.7 WorkgroupMaster ---- MYGROUPNAME MYSERVER From windows computers, it shows on the network, from Linux (dolphin browser) it does not show but calling 'smbclient -L myserver' it shows the shared directories... how can I allow other computers to connect? and how can I allow my local computer see its own shares? Thanks for your help -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Accessing sysvol results in fatal PANIC: internal error
Hello, I am currently testing two Samba 4.0.6 AD DCs. I've noticed that permissions in the sysvol directory do not seem to be consistent. Some GPs are owned by root, while others are owned by DOMAIN\Domain Admins. Attempting to fix the permissions with samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset while samba is running results in a PANIC: internal error. In fact, even trying to ls -l the directories inside of the sysvol directory causes a PANIC. The domain is then unusable until I restart samba. Here is a verbose log with log level = 3: http://pastebin.com/F1tSZVNf What is the correct/safe way to fix permissions on the sysvol directory (and why do they get changed like this) and what is a safe way to sync the sysvol directory between DCs (rsync causes this same PANIC)? Thanks, Andrew Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Accessing sysvol results in fatal PANIC: internal error
- Original Message - From: Andrew Martin amar...@xes-inc.com To: samba@lists.samba.org Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 9:48:41 PM Subject: [Samba] Accessing sysvol results in fatal PANIC: internal error Hello, I am currently testing two Samba 4.0.6 AD DCs. I've noticed that permissions in the sysvol directory do not seem to be consistent. Some GPs are owned by root, while others are owned by DOMAIN\Domain Admins. Attempting to fix the permissions with samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset while samba is running results in a PANIC: internal error. In fact, even trying to ls -l the directories inside of the sysvol directory causes a PANIC. The domain is then unusable until I restart samba. Here is a verbose log with log level = 3: http://pastebin.com/F1tSZVNf What is the correct/safe way to fix permissions on the sysvol directory (and why do they get changed like this) and what is a safe way to sync the sysvol directory between DCs (rsync causes this same PANIC)? Thanks, Andrew Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba It seems that this might be bug #9820: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9820 I haven't noticed it in winbind specifically, just in that samba becomes unresponsive. If so, the attached patch (#9043) is the current solution to this problem? Can it be applied to 4.0.6? Thanks, Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
autobuild: intermittent test failure detected
The autobuild test system has detected an intermittent failing test in the current master tree. The autobuild log of the failure is available here: http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2013-07-12-1845/flakey.log The samba3 build logs are available here: http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2013-07-12-1845/samba3.stderr http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2013-07-12-1845/samba3.stdout The source4 build logs are available here: http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2013-07-12-1845/samba.stderr http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2013-07-12-1845/samba.stdout The top commit at the time of the failure was: commit 940395d38bcc348eb5f1be7ba03cd554d9d3bc93 Author: Volker Lendecke v...@samba.org Date: Thu Jul 11 16:22:26 2013 +0200 smbd: Fix a 100% loop at shutdown time In the destructor of fsp-aio_requests[0] we put another request into fsp-aio_requests[0]. Don't overwrite that with TALLOC_FREE. Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke v...@samba.org Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Jul 11 20:56:42 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
