Quoting Volker Lendecke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 10:24:07PM +0100, Dan Peachey wrote:
I have an issue with Samba version 3.0.25b on Debian. I am receiving a
number of mails from my server with the following:
The Samba 'panic action' script,
Quoting Roylan Suarez Reyes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hola colegas
Disculpen por mi pregunta, yo se que la lista es en Ingles, pero me
gustaria saber si se puede escribir en Espanol, y si exiten muchos que hables
nuestro idioma...
For those who do no speak/read Spanish, Roylan is asking
Quoting Marco De Vitis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
What's happening with Samba packages for Debian Etch?
We're trying to keep up with upstream's security announcements and
regressions they induce.
I saw a security announce yesterday by Steve Kemp, but it's a bit
confusing, for Etch it lists some
Quoting Marco De Vitis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Well, I know, but it wasn't like this for Samba on Sarge, when Simo Sorce
promptly built upstream packages... but when Etch arrived I remember
someone else was to take his role, can't remember who now.
If I'm correct, that should be Jerry Carter.
Quoting Marco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Alessandro FAGLIA wrote:
After I upgraded to 3.0.14a-3sarge9, I observed a strange behaviour with
no apparent explanation.
Perhaps this link could be helpful:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=453050
And -sarge10 should be available in
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I saw a security announce yesterday by Steve Kemp, but it's a bit
confusing, for Etch it lists some 6etch6 packages and some 6etch7 others.
Are the current packages broken?
3.0.24-6etch5 is the first roll-up of packages fixing CVE-2007-5398
Quoting Michael Lueck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Frank Gruman wrote:
I believe Ubuntu has builds of Samba available through their
repositories.
Yes of course that is the way to get the official distro release.
Ubuntu, like Debian, only issue security patches to their packages after a
certain
Quoting Michael Lueck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
both helpers in the same package is a sufficient answer to my question.
(Yes, finally, light bulb goes on!)
I am certainly not going to nit-pick how the Ubuntu packagers decided to do
things, just was trying to fully understand these things.
Quoting Volker Lendecke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 07:00:36AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
In short, we (Ubuntu and Debian maintainers) are dropping support for
smbfs. This code caused many regressions in recent security fixes as
it is essntially unmaintained
Quoting Volker Lendecke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:22:56PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
At least considering to distribute it (or a derived work) as part of
the samba distribution could help samba users to switch from smbfs to
cifs?
Sorry, we can't. Looks nice
Thanks to the efforts of Mathieu Parent, ctdb is now available in
the testing branch of Debian, which represents the future version of
Debian, codename lenny, due out at the end of the year (you know
the drill about Debian releases, right?).
This is a good opportunity to mention the efforts of
Quoting Andrew Bartlett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
My current plans are to fly in on Saturday, spend a few days with Kai
Blin, then attend the conference (ie, hack in whatever space SerNet
gives us :-) from Monday to Friday, leaving on Saturday (at some point,
to join Jelmer in the Netherlands).
Quoting Karolin Seeger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I am afraid this might be a bug in the SerNet packages. We will have a
look at this next week (after Easter) and give you a report.
Karolin (and Volker as well), what are the differences between the
SerNet .deb packages and those on main samba sites?
Quoting Karolin Seeger (ksee...@samba.org):
Release Announcements
=
This is the second preview release of Samba 3.5. This is *not*
Please notice that, contrary to what we generally did up to now,
Debian maintainers have not been able to build a package for pre1
before
Last year, sometime in December, I wrote:
Please notice that, contrary to what we generally did up to now,
Debian maintainers have not been able to build a package for pre1
before pre2 went out...
This is mostly because we apparently can't build with the packaged
talloc libraries (Debian
Quoting Michael Lueck (mlu...@lueckdatasystems.com):
Peter Olcott wrote:
I decided to try
Ubuntu. After intallation it took only five minutes of editing the smb.conf
file to make my share fully operational.
:-)
I had been hearing good things about Ubuntu, however I was firmly in the
Quoting Rob Shinn (mor...@tuxedo.darktech.org):
I've used both and the packages themselves are basically the same.
A particular Ubuntu stable release package of Samba is more likely
to be more current than the Debian stable release, but that's a
result of policy differences, not technical
Quoting Karolin Seeger (ksee...@samba.org):
Release Announcements
=
This is the first release candidate of Samba 3.5. This is *not*
intended for production environments and is designed for testing
purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting
Dale Schroeder a écrit :
I've suspected that ever since reading Karolin's release notes for
3.4.4. Debian has not yet released 3.4.4
to testing, but I'll gladly try it as soon as it's available. For the
That should happen in about one week, assuming that no dependency chain
is blocking it.
Quoting Jeremy Allison (j...@samba.org):
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:14:31AM -0600, Dale Schroeder wrote:
This time, it seems to be an ADS specific winbind error.
I have attempted with the current kernel - 2.6.32-trunk-686 and the
previous kernel - 2.6.30-2-686.
What kind of
Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org):
Referring to the SUBJECT: Where is this leading to a panic
in Samba 3.4, I got lost in the meantime.
I'm afraid I don't know. I was cc:ed on this somewhat mid-thread, and
haven't seen any panics; what I know about is
Quoting Karolin Seeger (ksee...@samba.org):
Release Announcements
=
This is the second release candidate of Samba 3.5. This is *not*
Debian packages for 3.5.0rc2 were uploaded to Debian experimental as
of Sunday Jan 31st.
Many special thanks to Michael Adam for
Quoting Dale Schroeder (d...@briannassaladdressing.com):
On 02/01/2010 12:05 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Karolin Seeger (ksee...@samba.org):
Release Announcements
=
This is the second release candidate of Samba 3.5. This is *not*
Debian packages for 3.5.0rc2
Quoting Dale Schroeder (d...@briannassaladdressing.com):
Any chance that there will be included in this release, a fix for
the libkrb5-3 1.8 problem with winbind?
Or will that fix have to come from the libkrb5-3 maintainers?
Sam Hartman answered to this by reassigning the relevant bug to the
Quoting Didier Roques (didier.roq...@brive.unilim.fr):
Hi
i've got a server with lenny installed on it with samba 3.2.5.
I need to use preexec and postexec command into the [netlogon] service
like this
root preexec = /etc/samba/ntlogon -u %U -g %G -o %a -d
/etc/samba/netlogon/ -f
Quoting Didier Roques (didier.roq...@brive.unilim.fr):
Hi
i've got a server with lenny installed on it with samba 3.2.5.
My problem is that the var partition is sometimes full. In fact, if i use
df command I watch the partition full, but if I use du command the
partition is not full.
If i
Quoting Karolin Seeger (ksee...@samba.org):
Release Announcements
=
This is the third release candidate of Samba 3.5. This is *not*
intended for production environments and is designed for testing
purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting
Quoting Jeremy Allison (j...@samba.org):
Security problem with Samba on Linux
In Samba releases 3.5.0, 3.4.6 and 3.3.11 new code
was added to fix a problem with Linux asynchronous IO handling.
Situation for Debian:
- Debian stable isn't affected by this
Quoting Preller, Markus (markus.prel...@uk-erlangen.de):
Hi,
we upgraded one of our Solaris 10 (SPARC) machines from Samba 3.0.28
to 3.4.7. Symlinks are used within some shares that point to data outside
the original share path.
While this was no problem with Samba 3.0.28 access is denied
Quoting Robert LeBlanc (rob...@leblancnet.us):
What is the milestone that will get 3.5 into Debian Squeeze?
We're still in the process of deciding whether we'll go for 3.4.* or
3.5 for squeeze.
There are arguments for both:
- 3.4.* releases are now rock solid and the risk of important issues
Quoting Steve Holdoway (st...@greengecko.co.nz):
Does anyone have experience with the upgrade from 3.2 ( in lenny core )
to the samba provided 3.3 debian packages?
Specifically, I'm looking for a list of gotchas in this process, as I'm
short on machines I can use as test servers...
This is
Quoting Jeff Layton (jlay...@samba.org):
It's also worthwhile to note that I've recently re-enabled the ability
to run mount.cifs as a setuid root program in the latest cifs-utils
release:
http://linux-cifs.samba.org/cifs-utils/
...you may want to switch to using that instead if you need
Quoting Gary Dale (garyd...@rogers.com):
Now perhaps I'm missing something, but I have no trouble with users
mounting nfs shares. The idea that users can't mount cifs shares
strikes me as odd and an unnecessary impediment.
How about turning the binary we provide in Debian to setuid on the
Quoting Leonardo Carneiro - Veltrac (lscarne...@veltrac.com.br):
You can use the backports repo to install samba 3.4 and add Windows
7 machines, also windows Vista machines.
Also note that I may provide unofficial backported packages for samba
3.5 series through
(this mail is crossposted to 4 mailing lists, some of which being
subscribers-only. Please consider this when answering if you need to)
Let's see this as my first achievement of SambaXP
(http://www.sambaxp.org).
An official backport of cifs-utils
(http://www.samba.org/linux-cifs/cifs-utils/) is
(please note that this mail is crossposted to 3 lists. No need to CC
me to answers, I read the 3 of them...)
Some users (including me with my professionnal hat) want to use 3.5
versions of samba on production servers running Debian. Of course,
most of the time, these production servers are
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
(please note that this mail is crossposted to 3 lists. No need to CC
me to answers, I read the 3 of them...)
And one of them was invalid (sigh) as lists.debian.org is not yet
hosting Samba mailing lists..:-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
Quoting Mike Leone (tur...@mike-leone.com):
directories. Even tho Ubuntu 10.04 seems to have the /etc/pam.d files
already configured for samba, I copied over the common-account,
common-auth, common-password, common-session files from the 9.10 server
to the 10.04 server. Did the same with the
Please note that these packages are not (yet) digitally signed, so
apt-get might complain and ask for confirmation. I should improve this
in the future. This is why this mail is currently GPG-signed with the
key I'm using for Debian packaging.
As one of my co-maintainers kindly pointed:
-
So, as a service to our users, I prepared some packages which are now
available from http://pkg-samba.alioth.debian.org, also known as the
not so official but still quite actively supported backport service of the
samba packaging team of the Debian project (which makes a fairly long
name...).
This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.4.
Packages for Debian unstable are available as of May 12th. They're
expected to enter Debian testing in 10 days. Backports for Debian
lenny will follow on backports.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
Quoting Felix Miata (mrma...@earthlink.net):
Special thanks go to Blackbit [4] for creating the new design,
Special chide to Blackbit for the outcome. :~(
.../...
There are two ways to react after improvements or changes when one has
trouble with them: constructive criticism, given with a
Quoting Felix Miata (mrma...@earthlink.net):
That's what http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/SC/sc-sambaorg1005.png was supposed to be.
How does the depiction fall short?
Please accept some excuses here. In the next messages, you gave
ecidence of you will to contribute constructively.
Maybe the apparent
Quoting Thomas Gutzler (thomas.gutz...@gmail.com):
Hi,
After upgrading one of my samba servers from ubuntu jaunty (3.3.2) to
karmic (3.4.0) I cannot access the shares any more.
The default for passdb backend changed between these versions (from
smbpasswd to tdbsam) and, as you don't
Quoting Thomas Gutzler (thomas.gutz...@gmail.com):
passdb backend = tdbsam
already set. Yet another setting not listed by testparm.
Ah, because this is the default so it's trimmed by testparm. 3.3.2
testparm would probably have it shown.
So, sorry for the wrong answer.
Are you in position
Quoting Jeff Wiegley (je...@csun.edu):
Before we start let's clear up some common misunderstandings: I have
googled for the answer. I have spent the last six hours doing so and trying
various suggestions. Most of these suggestions point to solutions
involving chown or chmod. These are not
Quoting Guy Rouillier (guyr-...@burntmail.com):
I have spent many hours researching and trying many different
things, starting with this:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7. However, I still cannot
get Windows 7 Home Premium to connect to a Samba share using
user-based security. XP
Quoting Guy Rouillier (guyr-...@burntmail.com):
Thank you *very* much. That was the problem. Windows 7 now works
with security=user. Ugh. That entry was left over from the initial
smb.conf that Samba provided upon install. I left it in case I
Hmmm. If Ubuntu default smb.conf includes
Quoting Neil Price (npr...@gibb.co.za):
I hope it is relevant to report this here. The debian lenny samba
3.5.3 packages at http://pkg-samba.alioth.debian.org have this
problem:
It is relevant, yes. Mailing pkg-samba-ma...@lists.alitoh.debian.org
is also an option. Probably a better one as
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Indeed, I noticed this problem (this is the second time these
remainings from Debian squeeze packages slip to the lenny backports,
official or not)and fixed it in 2:3.5.3~dfsg-1~unoff50+2 packages.
However, as of now, binary packages
Quoting Marc Schiffbauer (m...@schiffbauer.net):
Now after the upgrade delete operations on files do not work anymore
until a user owns the parent directory or has world write access to
it (windows client (XP SP2) gets a permission denied error).
This is strange because a user can still
Quoting Neil Price (npr...@gibb.co.za):
I hope it is relevant to report this here. The debian lenny samba
3.5.3 packages at http://pkg-samba.alioth.debian.org have this
problem:
Setting up winbind (2:3.5.3~dfsg-1~unoff50+1) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/winbind.postinst: line 16: pam-auth-update:
Quoting Robert LeBlanc (rob...@leblancnet.us):
I have had 'net' not correctly registered on some squeeze machines. Since I
don't use the net command often, I just run net.samba3. I'm sure you could
do an `update-alternatives --config net` as root and choose to use
net.samba3 to restore the
I haven't run into the problem on Squeeze recently, personally, so it may
have gotten fixed in the last couple of releases. I did have a lenny box
with 3.4.8 from backports that had the problem a couple of days ago, but I
did two today without any problems. I just chalked it up as a fluke and
Quoting Guillermo Gutierrez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I have upgraded to samba 3.0.25 on a Debian Etch system and I am using
winbind to authenticate against active directory.
It used to work just fine with 3.0.24, wbinfo showed all users and
groups, getent used to show all users and groups, and I
That sounds like
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=424637, I'm afraid.
Not much hop yet...there is nothing in that bug except a kind of proof
that you're not alone...:-|
The error indicates that the packages were not built
to include krb5/ldap/ads support. Just a
Our bug. I fixed it last night for next week's 3.0.25a release
(http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Release_Planning_for_Samba_3.0).
You can either retest against the SAMBA_3_0_25 svn tree or I
can send you a patch.
Jerry, apparently this bug hits Debian's version in etch as it
appeared after
Jerry,
The patch is working fine. I have had it running on the production
machine at work since 12:00 am and there have been no *howls* from the rest
of the minions and I haven't run into any trouble.
Guys, I want to double check the patch to 3.0.24 (thanks, Jerry, for
it) but
Quoting Jeremy Allison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
People who have reported this bug (Endless Password Expiration in
3.0.25, bugzilla id #4630) can you please let me know if you're
working on 64-bit machines please ? I'm trying to track this
down for 3.0.25a and am working on a theory
The bug
Quoting Jason Haar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi there
I was using username map under 3.0.24 so that when I connected from
DOM\jhaar under (ADS Win2K3) Windows, it was mapped to my local jhaar
Unix account - with homedir /home/jhaar, etc.
That sounds like samba bug #4620
Quoting Jeremy Allison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I was a little worried this might break some existing
setups but this is the first report I've had, and believe
+1
http://bugs.debian.org/425391
:-)
But, anyway, I agree with youwhich explains why I marked the bug
wontfix in Debian's BTS.
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Quoting Jeremy Allison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I was a little worried this might break some existing
setups but this is the first report I've had, and believe
+1
http://bugs.debian.org/425391
:-)
But, anyway, I agree with youwhich
Can anyone confirm a bug here or offer any suggestions as to where to go
next?
Well, if this is reproducible safely and downgrading to samba 3.0.24
removes the bug, I'd suggest reporting this in the Debian BTS, along
with your smb.conf file, as many details as possible about your setup
and the
(extending the discussion to the ML of the Debian packaging team in
the Debian project. Sorry for the extensive quote)
Simo Sorce in samba|samba-technical:
Dear users,
I have uploaded the new 3.0.25a packages compiled for sarge.
At the same time I have removed older 2.2.x and 3.0.x packages
(samba-technical dropped as this is not really on-topic for it)
Quoting Miguel Gonzalez Castaños ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
If it is not a very complicated process I might help you out a bit.
Anyway, current Samba etch package seems not to work with ADS, so this
can be lay on the fixing tasks
With all due respect for the package maintainers of the Debian and Ubuntu
distros... I sort of wish there would be a way of getting official
packages of the current build verses some custom concoction (security
updates only). (shrug) I certainly do not seem to be the person to make
that
Quoting Eric Shuman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi all,
I am having a problem accessing very large files through my samba shares
after upgrading my file server to Debian Etch (Samba 3.0.24) from Debian
Sarge (Samba ???).
Debian sarge has 3.0.14a
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Quoting Paul Branon (paulbra...@googlemail.com):
I can only interact with the server from the local command line. (I
haven't altered the allow hosts in the config file. I haven't changed
anything) I used to be able to reach it from all the machines on my
network with windows \\10.10.10.1
Quoting Gilles (gilles.gana...@free.fr):
Also tried this, running restart smbd after each addition, to no
avail:
You apparently have a *browsing* problem, so it's likely that nmbd is
more the problem.
===
# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
[global]
workgroup = WORKGROUP
server string =
Quoting Gilles (gilles.gana...@free.fr):
It is. This is the Ubuntu package and It Works(tm)..:-)
Apparently, not that well ;-)
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1468111
Ah, this upstart thing*that* is a Ubuntu change to the Debian
package. Not my responsibility, then..:-) (at
Quoting Gilles (gilles.gana...@free.fr):
Hello
I notice I can modify existing files, but not create/delete. I also
notice that after saving a file I modified, Samba sets its access
rights to 744.
nobody.nogroup owns /var/www, with /var/www/. as 755
Logged on from XP as nobody.
Quoting Dale Schroeder (d...@briannassaladdressing.com):
After today's Squeeze upgrade from 3.4.8 to 3.5.5, domain logons were
initially broken.
I was fortunate to find Thomas Burkholder's workaround from last June, i.e.
turn off
server signing.
Can anyone explain why server signing
Quoting Rodolfo Barbosa (barbosa.rodo...@lunarconsultoria.com.br):
Guys,
Does the Windows 7 work with a Samba 3.2.5? If it does,
where can I find a documentation about it?
The mention of 3.2.5 makes me think you might be using Debian lenny..:-)
In such case, you probably want to use
, Steve Langasek, Mathieu Parent, Christian Perrier, Jelmer
Vernooij).
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.5.
It has just been uploaded to Debian unstable.
Thanks to the strict release policy of the Samba Team (only well
identified bugfixes allowed in the stable version releases), this
updated got pre-approved by the Debian release team.
So, it means
I have recurrent issue with ACLs on a server that's running samba
3.2.15 (this is a Debian lenny server and we're not ready, yet, to
upgrade it...we just upgraded samba from 3.2.5 to 3.2.15+security fixes).
If a foo directory, owned by joe, has joe and jim authorized to
write to it through the
Quoting Chris Smith (smb...@chrissmith.org):
And I have seen reported instances of Samba issues on Ubuntu being
resolved by avoiding the distro packages and compiling from source.
Hmmm, could be interesting to learn about which ones. Since 2-3 years,
we made great efforts in Debian to avoid
Quoting Chris Smith (smb...@chrissmith.org):
OK, not exactly a samba issue but maybe the Ubuntu maintainer reads
this list and can provide some input.
There is not exactly such thing as the Ubuntu maintainer. As far as
I can tell (with my Debian package maintainer hat), samba packages in
Quoting Miguel Medalha (miguelmeda...@sapo.pt):
On the Samba wiki page Samba3 Release Planning, the following is stated:
Thursday, February 2011 - Planned release date for Samba 3.5.7
Which of the February Thursdays will it be? 10, 17 or 24?
The quoted page resides here:
Quoting Karolin Seeger (ksee...@samba.org):
Release Announcements
=
Samba 3.5.7, 3.4.12 and 3.3.15 are security releases in order to
address CVE-2011-0719.
Debian addressed these in security updates:
- 2:3.2.5-4lenny14 for Debian lenny
- 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze1 for
Quoting markus hansen (hansenmar...@gmx.de):
Hi List,
I Upgraded my samba Installation from 3.3.8 (centos packages) to 3.5.8
(sernet packages). Now logging in does not work without providing the domain
any more - before the upgrade it worked. Does someone knows what has changed
in
Quoting Thomas Stegbauer (tho...@stegbauer.info):
Hi Laurent,
i cant imagine it is a permission problem.
The driver upload runs as root and i added root
Also i added root with
net rpc rights grant cake\domadm SePrintOperatorPrivilege -U cake/root
replaced cake with my domain-name.
Quoting Eckert, Robert D (eck...@indiana.edu):
Greetings,
Can I go directly from 3.4.7 to the new 3.5.8 without installing
any intermediate versions? Or is there a different route I should
follow?
You certainly can upgrade from 3.4.7 to 3.5.8. As usual with Samba,
it's very hard to say
Hello,
I'm one of the maintainers of samba packages in Debian.
As of now, Debian squeeze provides samba 3.5.6. As per Debian policy
wrt updates in the stable releases of the distribution, providing
3.5.8 (and later) is not an option we'll be considering for future
updates. The policy of our
I'm currently building a Samba3-based domain (DomA) that has a trust
relationship with an existing production NT4 domain (DomB).
DomA uses an LDAP backend. The LDAP server is local on the PDC and is
dedicated to such use. DomA runs Samba 3.5.6 on Debian 6.0.
DomB is an old-timer: NT4 domain
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
- I get a notice that the domain paassword is expired. I can either
change it or ignore the warning, but:
This was bug #7066. Fixed in 3.5.8.
- the DomB user logon script is not executed
This seems to be bug #6356 though my client
Quoting Marco Huang (marco.hu...@auckland.ac.nz):
Hi,
We have been running samba file server about 2 years without this problem.
The problem appeared at the same time on our debian and centos servers. Not
sure if it's related to any updates on our windows AD servers.
This seems to be
Quoting Marco Huang (marco.hu...@auckland.ac.nz):
We are using sernet-samba-3.5.8-27, but I've tried samba/winbind packages
from debian squeeze, same result, and the problem appears on centos5.5 as
well. We've been running these file servers for quite a long time, not sure
if there's any
Quoting denis rohou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hello
i've samba 3.022 with a ldap 2.2.26. I've no pb to join domain with my
win2000, but when I reboot I'm reject (bad username ...).
I find in debug that the first param sent by the client was the login
and I think it must be the machines name.
Quoting Weiser, Johann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
There is this really fancy sentence in the smb.conf man page: It is
possible to use smbd in a hybrid mode where it is offers both user and
share level security under different NetBIOS aliases.
There are a number of question here in this mailing
The day after Karolin announced the release of 3.2.0-pre3, the Debian
packaging team was able to upload .deb packages for it in Debian
*experimental*.
To use them, you need to already use Debian testing or unstable, then
add this to /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian
Quoting Volker Lendecke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
3.0.28a has known bugs in particular with trusts, so you
will inevitably have to backport stuff from 3.0.28b that
will be done by then. And, I have to agree with Jerry,
having to live with .28a for the next decade in Debian might
be not the best
Quoting Gerald (Jerry) Carter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Christian, I really disagree here. What made you com to
the decision that 3.0 is batter for a September Debian
release?
Because the Debian release team asked maintainers to slow odwn
upstream version bumps as of March 2008. And one of the
Quoting Gerald (Jerry) Carter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian,
| Debian entered the freeze stage for lenny on April 1st.
Wow! A 5 month freeze before release? I guess I can
understand for a distro but that seems a bit excessive.
Well, etch
Quoting Gerald (Jerry) Carter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
==
==
== Subject: Boundary failure when parsing SMB responses
== can result in a buffer overrun
==
== CVE ID#:
Quoting Nick Boyce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
(please keep applause for the moment we will upload the fixed packages
for etch. I haven't done this yet...3.0.30 is in unstable now, though)
Just wondering - given all the improvements (particularly Vista
compatibility) made since 3.0.24 - does anyone
I've already prepared packages for 3.0.30, which will be uploaded to
Debian unstable ASAP. These packages have a high priority so they
An i386 1:3.0.30-1 package was uploaded yesterday to Debian unstable.
Autobuilders (ie those magic scripts that build packages for all
supported architectures)
3.0.24-6etch10 packages are in the hand of the Debian Security Team
for review (this is our usual process). Here as well, autobuilders
have to build. Then a security announcement will be sent and
the packages will be available through security.debian.org APT
repository.
Updated packages for
Updated packages (3.0.30-2) are now available to users of Debian
testing (Debian testing is the future release of the Debian
distribution).
So, as of now, all development branches of Debian have fixed packages,
with the exception of Debian experimental as samba is 3.2.0-rc1
thereand that
Quoting Marcio Merlone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
It is a known bug, I found on a bugzilla somewhere. The bug consists
that the booting process needs the ldap server before it gets started.
So, the workaround, for now, is to have a slave ldap server which you
can use at least for booting. In
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
