Is this server a PDC or standalone server?
What is the backend for samba accounts?
Do you create unix accounts first as well, or are you using
winbind/idmap backend to allocate unix id's for the samba accounts.
Do accounts show up with wbinfo -u ?
On 01/18/2011 09:28 AM, Hajo Locke wrote:
You should be able to have a Samba PDC in the faraway site and set up
trusts with the AD PDC in the central site.
If the faraway users don't need to access files on the central server,
than you probably don't even need trusts.
On 01/18/2011 11:33 AM, t...@tms3.com wrote:
--- Original
Nt- I don't use the ldapsam:editposix option myself, if I understand
it correctly it means you don't have to precreate the underlying unix
accounts.
However, I believe you still need to do the following
Create a samba Administrator account
Create samba Domain Admins and Domain Users
:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
Nt- I don't use the ldapsam:editposix option myself, if I understand it
correctly it means you don't have to precreate the underlying unix accounts.
That is my understanding as well. I've never used
Just to clarify , by uid you mean then numerical user id?
Unix uid's are different that Windows SID's - so they will never be
identical. Samba has idmapping functionality to map unix id's (e.g.
123) to samba sid's (e.g
S-1-5-xx-a-bbb-cc-1123)
Since you
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.comwrote:
-- snip --
net idmap secret MYDOMAIN
net idmap secret alloc
You do *not* need this is the you are not using explicit idmap alloc, just
the default idmap
As a disclaimer, I am not using samba as a AD member server- although I
am also thinking about how I might make that happen.
I am reading the man page for idmap_ad.
The idmap_ad plugin provides a way for Winbind to read id
mappings from
an AD server that uses RFC2307/SFU
What do you mean users are in smb.conf?
How are you creating the users? Can you see the user or users with
pdbedit?
On 01/17/2011 11:06 AM, Hajo Locke wrote:
Hello,
sometime i have the problem that samba ist not knowing my new created
users.
i can see the users in my smb.conf but
I started on samba 3.0.x and upgrades to 3.4.x.Still having only
partial success myself.I have different ou objects in ldap for the
allocation range and each trusted domain .
My smb.conf (editted somewhat) is below.
I would that the idmapping would be created in the correct OU for
I would have thought you needed to have unix machine accounts in the
passwd/shadow file. Or are they using some sore of idmap allocation?
On 01/14/2011 04:34 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
Hi,
I plan to update our main RedHat EL 5.6 samba server from samba 3.3.x to
3.5.x .
What I
What version of Access? I find that, in general Office 2003 plays a
little nicer with Samba than Office 2007 (Office likes to change file
perms on files.)
Does Microsoft even supply security patches for Windows 2000 anymore?
(For me, when MS did not provide patches for extended daylight
may be more consistent with windows.
Original Message
Subject:Re: [Samba] MS Access
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:07:05 -0500
From: Gaiseric Vandal gaiseric.van...@gmail.com
Reply-To: gaiseric.van...@gmail.com
To: samba@lists.samba.org
What version of Access
I mentioned zfs , not because linux uses zfs specifically, but some of
the issues you might run into using a unix file system that supports
ACL's.
Sometimes a file may be created that then can't get deleted, or a file
may be created and then MS Office CHANGES the perms on the file so that
nslookup on windows machines does require the FQDN name- i.e.
pdc1.mydomain.com.
ping does not (windows will appropriately add the domain name.)
I have not tried net use \\pdc1.mydomain.com from a VPN connection.
I know that nslookup and ping in Windows have separate name
resolution
It may actually be easier to move everything including hostname and IP to
the new server and just shutdown the old (this would have to be off hours.)
You should be able to do the following-
- Configure the new server as a BDC. I don't know for use if you can
configure a BDC with a TDB backend-
2011/1/6 Gaiseric Vandal gaiseric.van...@gmail.com:
In fact this seems to work for any samba or windows
machine on the network EXCEPT the Samba 3.4.x PDC. It seems to work
for
Win 2003 machines, Samba 3.4.x member servers, XP machines, etc.
To analyze the problem, first put the entry
You should be able to use the net command to set the machine sid as well-
on the DC's, the machine sid should be the same as the domain sid.
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of Taso Hatzi
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011
Which version of Office?Do you have full rights to the parent
directory? Maybe it creates temp files in a different location?
When you double-click the file, was office already running? I can't see
why it would matter.
ALl I can think is that when you double-click a document
Yes
From: t...@tms3.com [mailto:t...@tms3.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 10:53 PM
To: gaiseric.van...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Samba] can connect to 2 samba servers by name but to one by IP
only
Just a quick thought...is pdc1 in DNS?
On Wednesday 05/01/2011 at 7:42 pm, Gaiseric
Even though it is a fully virtual NIC I think the firewall (Sonicwall) still
blocks Netbios broadcasts.So as far as I can tell, using DNS is the only
way a VPN client could resolve a windows machine name.
When I connect to the vpn, I can immediately use net use \\someserver on
pretty much
I am guessing it also updated samba (unless you had previously patched
samba.)
Did you try backing up and deleting any TDB files relating to idmap or
winbind and restarting samba?
On 01/06/2011 03:49 PM, CJ Keist wrote:
So, no one has a clue here?
--
Well,
http://samba.org/samba/docs/
the tarball downloads should include pdfs.
On 01/05/2011 02:29 AM, Christ Schlacta wrote:
http://samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/
This document has provided more information to me than I can
adequately express, and as masochistic as it sounds, I'd
Client machines shouldn't care if if the DC is a PDC or BDC. Are the
sites currently linked via VPN? Will they no longer be linked via
VPN? Will each site have the same domain name ? If the two sites are
linked somehow you want to make sure you use a WINS server on each site
to make
I have a samba domain (Samba 3.4.x PDC) and a Windows 2003 (in 2003
native mode) domain. Trusts MOSTLY work- having Samba recognize AD
users is a little trickier.
For samba to trust windows, make sure you have idmap info defined in
smb.conf. I have an ldap backend- it may not be quite
a Samba PDC domain and W2K
ADdomain
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:53:48 -0500
From: Gaiseric Vandal gaiseric.van...@gmail.com
Reply-To: gaiseric.van...@gmail.com
To: samba@lists.samba.org
I have a samba domain (Samba 3.4.x PDC) and a Windows 2003 (in 2003
native mode) domain. Trusts
I have a samba domain with a Samba 3.4.x PDC (compiled from source on
Solaris 10) and two Samba 3.0.x BDC's (Sun-bundled Samba on Solaris 10.)
XP clients use DHCP. When on the LAN, DHCP includes WINS server (the WINS
server is one of the Samba 3.0.x machines.)
We also have a VPN for remote
...@gmail.com
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] winbind and group permissions
Gaiseric,
thank you sooo much for the reply
I will make comments inline:
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 20:06 -0500, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
Winbind is used for allowing unix things like file system access, getent
testparm -v should show you the backend in use.
The pdbedit command has options for exporting and importing between formats.
On 01/04/2011 10:50 AM, Chris Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Michel, Loubert
lmic...@astoriafederal.com wrote:
I think I am using passdb backend =
comments inline:
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 20:06 -0500, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
Winbind is used for allowing unix things like file system access, getent
passwd and getent group to handle windows users (windows users and groups
get unix uid's and gid's allocated.)
To say this another way
to change a user's password?
On 12/27/2010 12:30 PM, Hartmut wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't see any way that, with your configuration, samba could be
using your linux password as a samba password. You would have to be
using
this may be of help
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7
On 01/04/2011 04:32 PM, Jeff Blaine wrote:
Hi all,
We're testing 3.5.6 as an upgrade to our old 3.0.x instance.
Our XP boxes can see our Samba 3.5.6 shares fine.
Our Win7 boxes cannot.
The specified network name is no longer
Winbind is used for allowing unix things like file system access, getent
passwd and getent group to handle windows users (windows users and groups
get unix uid's and gid's allocated.)I don't use winbind to login to a
unix system as a windows user but I do use it to allow the unix file system
I can't see any way that, with your configuration, samba could be
using your linux password as a samba password. You would have to be
using plain text passwords in windows have samba authenticate it
against your linux password.Is it really using your linux
password, or at some point was your
1. Domain Admins, Domain Computers etc
Those are well known groups. Do you have any windows servers or are
they just samba servers?If you have, or plan to have, any Windows
machines in the domain you are probably better off setting up the groups
correctly rather than trying to fix it
I would guess that if have have multiple LDAP backends it would be for
redundancy- which means the ldap servers would need to be configured for
replication, which means they would need to have the same suffixes for the
accounts.
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org
Is this to support authentication for unix users (e.g. via ssh) or
windows users (via samba?)
I found that after upgrading from samba 3.0.x to 3.4.x that the idmap
allocation stopped working. In my case I already had the imdap entries
populated into ldap. can you use wbinfo
The key advantages of the Solaris provided version is that
- someone already did the compilation work
- ZFS support is included (this is backported by Sun and not
included with 3.0.x source code from samba.)
- nsswitch support is also enabled
The big problems I had with Sun's version
I am not sure how you would have a DNS server assign random names. But if
you aren't going to have the correct entries for the XP machine in DNS, then
you probably should not have any DNS entries for those machines.XP
machines can register their hostnames directly in DNS (if the DNS server
Your example is a text-book case of why you would use domains. I am not
sure why it would be unacceptable- since you already have a samba machine
and, from the user POV, the login process is practically the same. The
LDAP component is for the samba backend- you would need an LDAP backend for
Samba 3 won't work as a BDC for a Windows PDC. I don't think Samba 4 would
either but you have to check the documentation at samba.org.
But you could probably make the samba server a member server in the Windows
domain- assuming that the WAN connection between the two is persistent and
: Samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Your home directory is listed as :'home/' but it
does not appear to exist
Hi Gaiseric Vandal,
yes linux system is the PDC
yes i joined the windows machines in PDC Domain
yes i able to logged in to the linux system successfully, I able to browse
Dec 2010, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
Samba 3 won't work as a BDC for a Windows PDC.
Yes, it will. I'm using 3.5 and it works fine.
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
--
To unsubscribe from
You would have to define a new Solaris 10 service for the new samba. I
don't know how to do this myself- the solaris documentation should say how,
but it always looked pretty complicated to me. You have to define the
dependencies.
You are probably better off creating an /etc/init.d/samba
What happens if you remote the radio_tr.txt file? Do you still get no
stations found or does it actually complain that the file is missing?
Does the file system support ACL's (ie. extended file permissions?)
Is it case specific all of a sudden? Is there an issue with the file being
more than
stored in LDAP BUT they are different fields.
On 12/17/2010 01:51 AM, Muqtadir Kamal wrote:
Hi Gaiseric Vandal,
Thanks for your quick response.
I have clicked create Home directory in Authentication tab.
Now I am able to login to Linux client.
But whenever I browse a windows system in LDAP
What is your client machine? This sounds like a Linux client
error. LDAP autofs tables point to a home directory that is not valid.
If your home dir is not mounted in linux of course you will get errors
about files in home missing.
possible causes
- typo in ldap autofs table
I would guess that the per-user settings should override the general
smb.conf settings.
I had problems with roaming profiles- I didn't want to use them but
sometimes on client logins/logouts the XP client would try to load or
create one. I have an ldap backend and eventually just deleted
My configuration has Samba domain controllers, not Windows domain
controllers, so my setup may not be applicable to you.
However, in order for unix to use windows groups I believe it needs to
use getent group to pull the information from winbind. First of all,
you need to make sure that
pm Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
Is your test PC on the same switch as the samba servers?
No.
Were you able to look at the event logs on the XP machines?
No. Well, not yet.
If this problem occurs with the new switch and the PDC but not the new
server , the only thing I
The problem seems to be with idmapping.In you smb.conf file do you
have a section for idmap- this tells samba which unix user id and
group id ranges can be used to correspond to windows users and id's.
the docs on samba.org may be a little out of date so you should also
check the man
idmapping does not work perfectly for me. idmap_ad backend means it
should use active directory info to determine the unix uid and gid. It
may bypass the issues with local tdb files.
If you read the man page on wbinfo, you can manually allocate uid's and
gid's
[--set-uid-mapping
Is your test PC on the same switch as the samba servers?
Were you able to look at the event logs on the XP machines?
If this problem occurs with the new switch and the PDC but not the new
server , the only thing I could think to try would be to lock the server's
NIC settings to force 1 speed
Does getent group show the Windows groups?
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of Peter Trifonov
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 11:58 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Missing secondary groups
Hello all,
Does the application create temporary files? Or does it try to create
temporary files? Can you configure the app to use the local client hard
drive for temporary files.I found that some MS Office Apps do funny
things with file permissions that are more likely to show up on a Samba
server
You should clarify the question-
You can, at least in theory, compile any version of Samba to run on Solaris
9.So the question really would be which versions of Samba are compatible
with which versions of Windows? And even which versions of Windows are
compatible with other versions of
I see that happen as well- although my entries are just
sambaDomainName=MEMBERNAME
not
sambaDomainName=MEMBERNAME,dc=example,dc=com
Otherwise, this seems to be normal.
On 11/13/2010 01:52 AM, Konstantin Boyandin wrote:
Hello,
I have followed the steps mentioned in
Are you using a login script? That should take care of mapping shared
folders to drive letters.
You can't use login scripts to setup printers. If the printers are
properly shared from a Windows server or Samba server users should be
able to easily locate them in My Network Places.
On
for giving relpy,I have made the samba successfully,it
access to all the user,i want only script to add multiple user with
password to samba server.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you using a login script
Looking through the release notes for samba 3.0.28a - 3.0.37 there does not
seem to be mention on 2008 R2.The following link may explain why it
doesn't work and a possible fix.
http://www.openg.info/entry/win-2008-r2-samba
But Samba 3.0.x. is end-of-lifed so I think your best off moving to
I used to run NIS.I did not use the pam password change option- the
unix password sync password program and password chat options were
sufficient.
If you run smbpasswd from command line as a regular user, what happens? All
I can guess is that samba things the unix script failed for some
Could you create a an extra domain, which imports the accounts from all
the other domains. If it is an ldap backend you can use ldap queries
nightly to pull info out. if a TBD backend up can use smbpasswd to dump
info out nightly. You may need to modify the data to make sure there
are no
I think it might work in the Windows world if you had multiple domains in
the same Active Domain forest.
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of Daniel Müller
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 3:29 AM
To: 'Mayank
I have a file /var/samba/locks/browse.dat.Browsing does not require wins
so I suspect that deleting the wins cache was not sufficient.
What is the output of hosted on the servers? I am guessing that 408c9b2b
and 40899b2b are the host id's of your two servers.
When you login to a domain
]
BDC120 UNIQUE 192.168.1.1550
PDC 20 UNIQUE 192.168.1.2555
DOMAIN 1C GROUP 192.168.1.1587
-Original Message-
From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van
You may want to read up on some of the Microsoft documentation. The
fundamental difference is that with a domain, the user and computer accounts
are centralized, not maintained separately on each computer.
My experience is that once you get before 5 machines managing a workgroup
gets
You may need to specify separate idmap sections for each domain, as well
as general settings. Samples of my smb.conf (samba 3.4.x ) are below.
When I was on samba 3.0.x, idmap entries would populate for each domain
in the correct OU. It would use the general idmap range, not domain
specific
are from idmap alloc
config:range. I guess the domain specific ranges are where idmap is
supposed to check for existing mappings first?
On 10/26/2010 12:02 PM, Alex Crow wrote:
On 26/10/10 16:32, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
You may need to specify separate idmap sections for each domain, as
well
In windows, do you change the folder settings so that any hidden files and
system files are displayed.
In Linux, are you using ls -a to show any hidden files?
In Linux/unix, if you have r rights on the parent directory you should be
able to see all files with ls -a, even the hidden ones
If the two organizations having nothing to do with each other, does that
mean they don't need access to the same files?
Will the following solution work for you
- configure a 2nd IP on the server
- run two instances of samba- each samba instance has its own smb.conf
file, with unique ip,
I have similar issues. II am running Samba 3.4 (compiled from source)
on Solaris 10- so selinux is NOT an issue for me. Otherwise I have
similar config (LDAP backend for samba, trusted domains to windows 2003
server.)
thought this used to work but a month or so ago it wasn't.
getent
-uid.)
On 10/21/2010 05:15 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:02:55PM -0400, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
I have not tried ssh'ing in as a trusted domain user (I definately
don't want that available..)
It's not something I want to make available
What kind of domain - samba PDC or Windows Active Directory ? Maybe the
samba version is just too old.
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of Steven Moyse
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 8:52 PM
To:
Two possible options:
1) It may not be a local vs domain user issue. It may be an administrator vs
non administrator issus.
Can you add the domain user to the local administrators group?
2) It may be the file permissions- samba doesn't always translate the unix
acl's to windows
, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
Did you try changing smb.conf on the NAS to be port 139 only?
Also, it seems that 55 GB should not take one hour to copy (55 GBytes is
440 Gbit, and at 1 Gbit/sec and 60 secs / min, the transfer sohuld take
about minutes- at least in theory.)
I am guessing
Is your samba server also a WINS server? That may help browsing issues.
Do you have smb ports defined in smb.conf?
The default is
smb ports = 445 139
I found if I set
smb ports = 139
some clients would have trouble locating shares or authenticating to
servers.
wiki.samba.org should
Maybe I missed it- but do you have problems if the client and server
are on the same network segment?
Are all the local WINS servers samba servers or something else?
On 10/19/2010 12:45 PM, Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 10/19/2010 9:47 AM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
Is your samba server also
Have you tried the precompiled samba version from sunfreeware.com? It
is only 3.4.2 but should have AD support. It won't have ZFS support
(an issue for Solaris 10 but Solaris 9.)
the winbind nsswitch stuff may be require a little work to setup.
On 10/18/2010 10:05 AM, Robert M. Martel
I had a lot of trouble with compiling Samba on Solaris 10.(Thumbs
down to Sun for abandoning Samba.)
The ld command was a problem.Sunfreeware gcc is hard coded to use
/usr/ccs/bin/ld. I had set up a symlink so that /usr/ccs/bin/ld
actually pointed to gld (e.g. /usr/sfw/bin/gld or
idmap and winbind may be caching the entries (use testparm -v to look
for cache or timeout values.) windbind or idmap processes may load
data when they start, cache it, but when the cache expires they DON'T
reload the data.
Just a guest. I had this problem with samba 3.0.x but not 3.4.x.
-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im
Auftrag von Gaiseric Vandal
Gesendet: Montag, 11. Oktober 2010 16:48
An: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
By default samba listens on two TCP ports- 445 and 139. You can
specify this in smb.conf
smb ports
is a feature of Windows 7 and not an actual bug.
On 10/15/2010 04:09 PM, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
[Accidentally sent this to Gaiseric. Oops]
On Wednesday 13 October 2010, Gaiseric Vandal elucidated thus:
Do you have an account (or accounts) for on the samba server for the
Windows user(s
What is the program they are running? What kind of files? Is the
issue that once they give them selves write access they are then able to
read data they couldn't see before?
On 10/14/2010 04:19 AM, Daniel Müller wrote:
I think you can restrict users of installing programs with policies
I think the ports in question will be
137-139 and 445
Or even 139 and 445 should be sufficient. But I would make sure the
firewall rules only allow access on those ports for the samba server IP's.
Browsing over the internet seems a little unreliable. Remote users may
want to know
Do you have an account (or accounts) for on the samba server for the
Windows user(s)? Are the passwords the same?
Does the samba server workgroup name match the domain name on the
windows clients?
Can you use the username map option in smb.conf and have a username
map file that maps
Trusts are between domains.
If you configure a trust so that DomainA trusts DomainB, a machine
account for DomainA is created in DomainB- this allows DomainA to
retreive a list of user names that it can trust.
WHen you configure the outgoing trust in Windows (i.e. to you ask
another
On windows machines netdiag, dcdiag or nbtstat may help you determine
which DC your machine has authenticated to. (dcdiag and netdiag should
be in the windows 2003 resource kit or something like that from
microsoft downloads.) In general, Windows clients will want to
authenticate to a BDC
...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of Donny Brooks
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 5:59 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Moved PDC now issues
On 10/13/2010 4:43 PM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
On windows machines netdiag, dcdiag or nbtstat may help you
, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
By default samba listens on two TCP ports- 445 and 139. You can
specify this in smb.conf
smb ports = 445 139
445 is the newer smb over tcp.139 is the older smb over netbios
over tcp/ip. 445 was for Windows 2000 and newer clients.. I am
not sure why
By default samba listens on two TCP ports- 445 and 139. You can
specify this in smb.conf
smb ports = 445 139
445 is the newer smb over tcp.139 is the older smb over netbios
over tcp/ip. 445 was for Windows 2000 and newer clients.. I am
not sure why samba enables 445 by
I would try disabling the machine account scripts, and manually creating
the unix level account domain trust with what ever tools you use to for
ldap accounts. That should help eliminate if the script is just not
running correctly.
When you join local windows machine to the domain, are
Is this an XP machine?
Do you have password sync enabled? If password sync is enabled BUT the chat
script (or whatever mechanism you use to change the unix password) is broken
then password change can fail. The first thing I would try would be
disabling the password sync feature and seeing if
What OS?
I am running Solaris 10 machines with Samba 3.4.x and 3.0.x
Samba 3.4.x (and presumably 3.5.x) checks to see how many windows groups
the user belongs to. It checks what the max number of groups a user is
allowed to belong to by the unix syste. If the windows group list
exceeds
I think that even with out that explicitly set domain members should be
able to locate the domain controller.
Does this problem exist with Windows clients that are joined to the
domain? In smb.conf, have you set the ports? By default 139 and
445 are listening- if you disable 445 it
with a windows 2008 dc.
-Original Message-
From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 17:02
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Need help compiling Samba on Solaris
Sort of compiled? Does that mean some options didn't compile?
I
/samba.
You have still not clarified why nsswitch.conf has entries for ldap.
On 10/04/2010 05:17 AM, Ben George wrote:
please check this link
http://bentgeorge.com/samba/
all are mentioned here
Thanks
Ben.T.George
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com
I had a lot of problems with this as well.I found it hard to find
much documentation on the zfs module in samba from either samba or sun.
(PS- A big thumbs down to Sun and the OpenSolaris crowd for apparently
abandoning samba.)
I am running Samba 3.0.x from Sun on two servers and samba
to allow access through pam only enabled accounts since
usually the access is restricted to shadow by default.
On 10/4/10 7:11 AM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
According to your page
getent passwd is showing the domain users.
If you try to ssh into your linux machine as ben, with the way
Sort of compiled? Does that mean some options didn't compile?
I was able to compile samba 3.4.x. (as you point out, it requires
tinkering with the CPPFLAGS etc.)The latest OpenLDAP from
sunfreeware should be fine (plus its dependencies, which are listed.)
Presumably you are using GCC
Are you logged into your workstation as a Administrator? Is the local
Administrator password on your workstation same as on the server? Even if
this is the case, the samba may still complain that you initially connected
as one user (PC\Administrator) and now want to connect as another use
This reminded me of something:
Solaris is bundled with Kerberos. However, with sunfreeware samba you may
have also installed Kerberos packages from sun freeware. Assuming the PATH
is let for /usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:$PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set
/usr/local/lib: you should be
301 - 400 of 695 matches
Mail list logo
