On 01/12/10 15:54, Walter Mautner wrote:
Am Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010 20:24:25 schrieb Jason Somers:
Clients are NFP, and have about 100 workstations. Once or twice a year,
they get grants for upwards of 10 new systems. These systems get
distributed to those with the most need, and in turn,
On 01/11/10 09:31, Rob Shinn wrote:
Alberto Moreno wrote:
Is possible to sync both ldap servers every time I change something
in ldap? or a better way to do it?Alberto Moreno wrote:
You could probably do this with OpenLDAP's syncrepl replication
facility. You may also wish to consider
On 01/11/10 06:48, Brajesh Shrivastava wrote:
Hi All
I have Samba 3.2.11 installed on Suse (sles 10) machine. I am playing
around the group mapping functionality. When I map a linux group to nt
group. I can see that groups is visible on windows client. But, if I
restart the smbd daemon
On 01/11/10 10:13, Brajesh Shrivastava wrote:
Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
On 01/11/10 06:48, Brajesh Shrivastava wrote:
Hi All
I have Samba 3.2.11 installed on Suse (sles 10) machine. I am
playing around the group mapping functionality. When I map a linux
group to nt group. I can see that groups
It seems that the nature of the XP client is to use the BDC if
available. You could try modifying the priority by adjusting the
folloing
announce version
os level
though to be honest I never got that to work for me. (I have a samba
3.0.x PDC and BDC and a samba 3.4.x BDC and I
On 01/07/10 11:37, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
Hey, all. I've used Samba a lot, but took a job about four years ago
during which time I've only used it for one-off projects. Looks like I
might take a new job, though, and I'll get to call the shots. I'd *love*
to have Samba with AD running
On 01/07/10 00:39, Alberto Moreno wrote:
Hi people.
I have 2 domains right now:
WinNT4 + Windows 2k3.
A lot of u will say, why don't u just move everything to win2k3?..
well I prefer to work with linux/Unix.
My question is this, I test the migration from NT4 to linux with
ldap, it
On 01/07/10 17:34, David Southwell wrote:
Hi
Can anyone please tell me what is happening here and how to cure it
System: freebsd 7.2 p3
Jan 7 22:23:14 dns1 smbd[3227]: [2010/01/07 22:23:14, 0]
lib/util.c:reinit_after_fork(1054)
Jan 7 22:23:14 dns1 smbd[3227]: tdb_reopen_all failed.
Jan
It didn't work for me on Sun with Samba 3.0.37 either.I was under
the impression (quite possibly wrong) that for Win 7 support you would
need Samba 3.3.x or 3.4.x anyway.I have been testing the
sunfreeware.com version of samba 3.4.x (full zfs support seems to be
missing) and compiling
On 12/18/09 10:15, Matias Morawicki wrote:
Hello u all, sorry to bring this issue back again, but I´ve been
searching and trying all the advices suggested in previous posts and I
still can´t see the samba server in the win network neighborhood.
I can see the samba shares from win via net view
On 12/10/09 14:39, Nick Pappin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Nick Pappinnpap...@latahfcu.org wrote:
Hey Everyone,
So here is what is going on I have two computers on the same network
that are both connected to the PDC of a samba domain (on the same network
segment):
Does AIX use pam?
If so, check to see if there are any differences on entries relating to
sshd, telnet or other.
On 12/08/09 13:12, robertobo...@bayviewassetmanagement.com wrote:
Hello everyone, I'm posting this one again I hope to get some kind of
help. Doing further test telnet works
On 12/03/09 17:42, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
Sunfreeware.com has compiled packages of Samba 3.4.2 with kerberos and
ldap support included (if you also install the ldap and kerberos
packages from sunfreeware.) However it does not include the
nss_winbind.so.* or libnss_winbind.so.* files
WINS servers aren't, at least in theory, absolutely essential. I have
just found that over the years it makes locating/browsing for
Windows/Samba resources more reliable (espectially with multiple network
segments and multiple domains.) If you aren't using WINS, clients
will locate other
On 12/03/09 05:29, Battersby-Cornmell, Robin Alasdair wrote:
Dear all,
I regret that I am very new to this tool from the install side. I have so far
altered shares on a running machine only.
I have (thanks to Joss for some help already) installed version 3.4.3 under AIX
6.1 giving it our
Sunfreeware.com has compiled packages of Samba 3.4.2 with kerberos and
ldap support included (if you also install the ldap and kerberos
packages from sunfreeware.) However it does not include the
nss_winbind.so.* or libnss_winbind.so.* files.
Solaris does include nss_winbind.so already
On 12/02/09 01:51, Kevin Kimani wrote:
Hi all,
i have a setup where by there is a PDC thats authenticating users
through ldap. i have several other BDCs' that are doing the
replication of the main server. am trying to setup the users to be
authenticated by the BDC but am not able to. Any
smb.conf and disabled
samba 3.4.x. My guess is that samba choked on loading groups that did
not have a proper SID. I have about 230 unix/ldap groups and didn't
want to have to create an explicit group mapping (SID entry) for each group.
On 11/25/09 22:42, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
I think I
Apache Directory Studio (Windows and Linux) is pretty good too.
On 11/25/09 11:27, Nick Pappin wrote:
Check out luma it is a graphical ldap editor that allows you to only delete
a certain attribute.
--
W. Nick Pappin
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Bruno Stevenaspe...@gmail.com wrote:
Gaiseric Vandal schrieb:
I assume an index is not an actual LDAP attribute or object like
sambaSID but is more like a database index for optimizing searches?
You're right :) But in some cases like substring search (samba searches
i.e. for sambaSID=S-1-5-32-* to get the local groups
My guess is that they may have required NTLMv2 or something thing
similar on the Win machines. If these machines are part of an Active
Directory domain, it would be relatively easy for this to be done.
password encryption. I cannot do that. The
network people (government run network) will not allow that.
The samba machine is set for encrypted passwords.
On Nov 25, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
My guess is that they may have required NTLMv2 or something thing
similar on the Win
the comments at the top of each ldif file, the
only change was the addition of sambaTrustedDomainPassword objectClasses.
On 11/25/09 03:41, Jan Wenzel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gaiseric Vandal schrieb:
I assume an index is not an actual LDAP attribute or object like
Repeat for all the other mapped groups
Update smb.conf on the 3.0.x servers to use ldap group suffix =
ou=group.
This is assuming of course that Solaris doesn't have problems with group
names with spaces.
-Original Message-
From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van
, Jan Wenzel wrote:
Hi, you have to create a 'sub' index for sambaSID in your LDAP
configuration. The way samba searches for groups has been changed with
samba 3.2 and above.
I think you also need to install the new schema to be able to create a
sub index.
Greetings
Jan
Gaiseric Vandal schrieb
RVNET\A and RVNET2\A will be completely separate users.But unless the
SID is stored with-in one files itself I would think it would be just a
matter of changing the file permissions on the profile as you described.
The windows 2003 Res Kit tools include a moveuser command that may help
This happened to us when we switched from TDB to LDAP backend. (Samba
3.03x) I suspect that for some users sambaProfilePath may have had
space character but wasn't actually null. For some users we just
deleted the sambaProfilePath attribute.
You may need to change the profile type on
I have the following setup:
PDC: Samba 3.0.37 on Solaris 10
BDC1: Samba 3.0.37 on Solaris 10
BDC2: Samba 3.4.3 on Solaris 10
Samba 3.0.37 is the bundled version of Samba.
Samba 3.4.3 is compiled from source.
BDC2 is a recent addition to the network.
All machine use LDAP as the
Output from pdbedit on samba 3.4.x includes
ldapsam_getgroup
Output from pdbedit on samba 3.0.x includes
init_group_from_ldap
I am not sure if that is somehow related.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday
I use Apache Directory Studio to manage my LDAP structure, for things like
creating OU's, unix users etc. (I am using Sun's ldap server, and didn't
like the admin tools provided.)
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
On Behalf
Try
Net view \\server.ip
Net user \\server.ip\share
Can you set up a share on the XP machine that the linux client can see via
smbclient?Maybe the necessary services aren't running on the XP machine.
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org
There are various TDB that cache info (maybe under /var/samba/locks)
If you run testparm -v there may be some timeout or cache variables you
could adjust.
Does it matter if you have mapped the unix group to a Windows group? In my
environment we set up group mappings for the key groups (like
: +91 9320023444
For any CC/CQ queries please contact cm.helpd...@relianceada.com
*Gaiseric Vandal gaiseric.van...@gmail.com*
17-11-09 07:30 PM
Please respond to
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com
To
pankaj.c.pim...@relianceada.com
cc
Subject
RE: [Samba] Need help
On 11/17/09 14:43, Pol Hallen wrote:
Hi all :-)
I compiled samba on my debian stable (all bin are in /usr/local/samba/bin/),
smbpasswd too. I use it but I don't see the smbpasswd password file. Where
smbpasswd update own file of passwords?
thanks
Pol
testparm -v should show this.
--
To
into play?Do I need to enable winbind in
pam.conf? I don't want to enable ssh or other unix level logins for
the trusted users.
Thanks
On 11/17/09 14:16, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
I am running Samba ver 3.0.37 on Solaris 10 (sparc) as a PDC with LDAP for
the backend for both samba
On 11/17/09 08:05, Dominic Iadicicco wrote:
One of my samba Domain controlers is trying to reach two IP addresses of
192.168.221.1 and 192.168.91.1. The samba server is not even on a 192.168
subnet. It is currnetly on a 172.16.12.x subnet. I have never seen a
problem like this before. Please
I am running Samba ver 3.0.37 on Solaris 10 (sparc) as a PDC with LDAP for
the backend for both samba and unix accounts. Assume the samba SMBPDC is
called PDC.
I have also set up a trust with an Windows domain- lets call it
WINDOMAIN- (the PDC for the Windows domain is Win 2003 but is in
I have the following
PDC: Samba 3.0.37 on Solaris 10
BDC1: Samba 3.0.37 on Solaris 10
PDC is configured to be the WINS server for everything, including XP Pro
clients and other Samba machines.
PDC# testparm -v | grep master
Load smb config files from /etc/sfw/smb.conf
...
Actually, restarting nmbd on BDC1 does seem to have fixed this.
Original Message
Subject:Samba BDC does not register in WINS as BDC
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:52:25 -0500
From: Gaiseric Vandal gaiseric.van...@gmail.com
Reply-To: gaiseric.van...@gmail.com
user is: [domain]...@[gates]
...
It also looks like I may not get the same logon server each time I
logon- so I guess my PC could have authenticated against one DC, and I
could authenticate against another.
Thanks
On 11/13/09 19:04, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
Setting announce version = 4.5
I have the following setup:
PDC: Samba 3.0.37 on Solaris 10
BDC1: Samba 3.0.37 on Solaris 10
BDC2: Samba 3.4.3 on Solaris 10
Samba 3.0.37 is the bundled version of Samba.
Samba 3.4.3 is compiled from source.
BDC2 is a recent addition to the network.
All machine use LDAP as the
the trust secret via RPC calls succeeded
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 12:48 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: DC priority, BDC prob with domain groups
I have the following setup:
PDC: Samba
Did this use to work OK?
It sounds like samba is not properly mapping YOURDOMAIN\username in Windows
to the underlying unix account.Do you create the unix accounts first or
does samba automatically create them? Either way, I think your LDAP entry
for each user should include the unix uid
I had the same situation (Solaris 10, Sun Dir Server, Samba 3.0.33.)
I wrote an external script to change the password. Make sure the script
is owned by root and with perms 600 or 700 since it needs the LDAP super
user's password.
#vi smb.conf
...
unix password sync = yes
passwd program =
Are you using UFS or ZFS on the underlying file system- ZFS has a lot
more granularity - which is both a blessing and curse when it comes do
ZFS / Windows ACL integration. Although why smbclient should be
different either I don't know.
Are the initial ACL entries the same on a new file or
.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gaiseric Vandal gaiseric.van...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:30 PM
Subject: Domain trusts forgetting trusted users
To: samba@lists.samba.org
I am running Samba ver 3.0.33 on Solaris 10 (sparc) as a PDC with LDAP
for the backend for both
On 10/30/09 15:33, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
Hi all!
I wanna know how to create the LDIF to import in OpenLDAP to create a
machine account.
Anyone can help?
Regards,
Rodrigo.
In my environment, people and machines have preexisting unix accounts
in ldap, since we also have linux
I am running Samba ver 3.0.33 on Solaris 10 (sparc) as a PDC with LDAP
for the backend for both samba and unix accounts.
I have also set up a trust with an Windows domain- lets call it
WINDOMAIN- (the PDC for the Windows domain is Win 2003 but is in
mixed mode for backwards compat.) The SAMBA
Not easily- I believe you have to configure both samba and each client
to use plain-text passwords, which is really insecure.
You may be better off assigning them a temp starter password that they
then have to change on 1st windows login.
On 10/28/09 14:36, Paras pradhan wrote:
Is it
I ran into the following two related problems with samba 3.0.xx and
Solaris 10 and ZFS
1. With Word, Excel or PowerPoint 2003 you could save the document
maybe 4 times but on the 5th time you wouldn't be able to save the file
- or worse it would disappear.
The issue seemed to be that for
:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 13:36, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
I supposed it depends if Samba is configured to automatically create
the underlying unix accounts when you create samba accounts. My
setup doesn't. I created a user account in ldap for my BDC.
(the unix
I supposed it depends if Samba is configured to automatically create the
underlying unix accounts when you create samba accounts. My setup
doesn't. I created a user account in ldap for my BDC. (the unix
passwd shd be *LK* and the shell shd be /bin/false) Running net rpc
join will then
Is your domain controller in mixed mode? (i.e. for backward
compatibility with NT4 machines?) I am not 100% certain, but I think
this is required. From the perspective of a Windows machine, Samba is
an NT4 server.I have had limited success with trusts with a Win
2003 AD DC was in mixed
with the old smb.conf file to extract the user SID an
NTpassword entries.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running Samba ver 3.0.33 on Solaris 10 (sparc.) Initially I had
the server configured as a domain controller with the passdb backend
I am running Samba ver 3.0.33 on Solaris 10 (sparc) as a PDC with LDAP
for the backend for both samba and unix accounts.
I have also set up a trust with an Windows domain- lets call it
WINDOMAIN- (the PDC for the Windows domain is Win 2003 but is in
mixed mode for backwards compat.) The SAMBA
I am running Samba ver 3.0.33 on Solaris 10 (sparc.) Initially I had
the server configured as a domain controller with the passdb backend
= tdbsam option. The underlying unix accounts were stored in LDAP
(Sun Directory Server.) Those accounts are also used for non-Samba
services.
Since I
program = /usr/bin/passwd.fake %u
It doesn't look like smb.conf is even calling the password program any
more. And the log files don't show anymore smbd/chgpasswd.c:
entires.
On Jan 14, 2008 11:22 AM, Gaiseric Vandal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have now tried the following
- Upgraded from
I have now tried the following
- Upgraded from samba 3.026a to 3.028
- Rebuilt --with-pam and added pam password change = yes
(some posts indicated this helped)
- Added a root samba account and a member of Domain Admins (to
see if it was related to unix level file permissions.)
-
Does this mean I should be changing the locale? Is this a samba or an
OS setting?
Or should I just wait for the next version of Samba to fix this.
Thanks
On 1/10/08, Andriashyk Yuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
samba 2.026a-2.8 bug.
Will set temporally english locale.
Gaiseric Vandal
permission issues.
Thanks
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gaiseric Vandal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jan 10, 2008 11:27 AM
Subject: password sync Failed to open/create TDB passwd
To: Samba samba@lists.samba.org
I am trying to enable unix password sync. PDC is solaris 3.026a
your passwd chat = line is wrong. what OS are you using? I
can give you passwd chat for Fedora and CentOS
Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
I made a little progress. It is partly a file permissions error.
If I change the permission of /usr/local/samba/private to 660. Since
the unix
I am trying to enable unix password sync. PDC is solaris 3.026a on Solaris 9.
my smb.conf file includes:
[global]
workgroup = MYDOMAIN
server string = myserver
passdb backend = tdbsam
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd
To the best of my knowledge, you can't join XP Home machines to a
domain. Which would be a major argument against ever using XP Home
in a work environment. (I realize many businesses buy this because
they think it is cheaper.)
If you don't use a domain setup, if you have a user account for
I have posted on this subject before but am still running into
problems. The main question is whether I need to use Windbind in a
single samba domain when each samba server also uses NIS for
centralized unix level authentication. And if, in fact, I need
windbind do I need it on all the samba
I am running Samba 3.026a, Solaris 9 PDC. Samba uses tdbsam password
backend. Unix level accounts are NIS. I am not using password
syncing or winbind on Samba, and I have not configured the Windows
servers to use NIS through SFU or Cygwin.
The Windows domain includes several Windows 2000/2003
I overlooked that I did have some Citrix Presentation Servers for Unix
as well- so Citrix web interface would of course try to verify my
password on those machines as well.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gaiseric Vandal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 28, 2007 3:35 PM
Subject: Citrix
://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4863
~Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Gaiseric Vandal
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 5:04 PM
To: Samba
Subject: [Samba] smbpasswd and 8 character limit
The smbpasswd on my PDC (Solaris 9
Samba 3.026a on Solaris PDC.
I am trying to enable password sync. My smb.conf file includes...
passdb backend = tdbsam
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd -r nis %u
# passwd chat = *New*Password* %n\n *new*Password* %n\n *changed*
# passwd chat = *New*Password*
The smbpasswd on my PDC (Solaris 9, Samba 3.026a) will truncate or
corrupt passwords over 8 chars.
The smbpasswd command on the linux clients (Samba 3.024a) is OK.
Anyone know if this is a samba version issue or something solaris
specific.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Hi all
I am still unsure of the correct way to configure member servers.
I have one PDC (Samba 3.026a on Solaris 9) and several member servers
(including Samba 3.026a on Solaris 9 and 10, and Samba 3.024 on Fedora
core 6.) Each machine uses NIS for unix accounts.
The Samba by Examble Book
I relatively recently implemented Samba 3.026a (Solaris PDC)I then
moved the PDC role to another machine. On the new pdc I 1st grabbed
the domain SID
newpdc# net rpc getsid -S oldpdc
Storing SID --for Domain MYDOMAIN in secrets.tdb
newpdc#
and then
I find having all clients point to a WINS server (whether Samba is
the WINS client or WINS server) avoids most browsing issues.
On 10/25/07, Shawn Everett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a problem with my long-running Samba workgroup where hosts will
stop
coming up in View Network
I did a NT4-Samba migration recently and net vampire did copy over
all the information, users, machines, passwords. However, the
unix-level accounts do need to be created 1st. (The net vampire
command should indicate what accounts it could not migrate.)
Some accounts had issues due to
I have joined Windows 2003 to samba domains with no problem.
I wasn't ever able to join them to a Sun PC Netlink domain (which did
support XP) so it does do something a little differently- I just couldn't
figure out what was different.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I eventually migrated from PC Net link to Samba as recommended below. With
barely anyone noticing.
Thanks for the advice.
-Original Message-
From: Volker Lendecke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 4:32 PM
To: Gaiseric Vandal
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re
is
or at least can clarify how winbindd should be working.
-Original Message-
From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 5:50 PM
To: samba
Subject: group mapping on a member server - winbindd and solaris 10
From what I can tell it does look
it will cause issues with unix
level logins.)
Thanks
From: Gaiseric Vandal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: samba samba@lists.samba.org
Subject:[Samba] group mapping on a member server
Date: Mon, 17
I have installed a Samba 3.025a PDC and 2 member servers. All on
solaris. (The Samba PDC replaced a NT4 PDC. Account data was
migrated with the net vampire command.) All solaris machines use
NIS. On the PDC i created group mappings between the NIS groups and
the Windows groups.
I can access
Thanks
That fixed it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gareth Cummings
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 4:38 AM
To: Gaiseric Vandal
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Clearing account lockout
The following will reset
I am migrating from an NT4 PDC to Samba 3.025a. I used the net rpc
vampire command to transfer the user and machine accounts. Almost all
accounts have a lower case Unix user name, except for the administator
account. Unix is case sensitive, Windows doesn't seem to care.
# pdbedit -v
I recently am migrating my PDC from NT4 to Samba 3.025. Apparently due to a
mismatch between the capitalization of the Windows account and the Unix
account (Administrator vs administrator) I managed to lock the account
before catching the discrepenacy.
# pdbedit -v administrator
Unix username:
This affects local logins as well as RDP.
On 6/1/07, Jean-Jacques Moulis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007 17:53:10 -0400 Gaiseric Vandal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GV I joined 2 Windows 2003 machines to the domain. I was able to log as
GV administrator and root but no other accounts
Can you set Excel to use the local drive for the temporary files? By
default, MS Office creates temporary files in the same directory as
the original file. In the past, troubleshooting a LAN related issue,
it seemed that when saving a file, excel would rewrite the entire file
to a new file
Do you know if this was specific to Solaris? Or is linux also
affected?I had configure warnings building on solaris 9 and 10.
Thanks
On 6/1/07, Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
pdc # ./wbinfo -t
configure errors.
I even tried running the autogen.sh file first.
I had no problem when I compiled 3.0.22. I don't think I saw this
with 3.0.25 either.
Thanks
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gaiseric Vandal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 30, 2007 4:07 PM
Subject: Samba 3.025 wbinfo
I have compiled Samba 3.0.25a from source on a Solaris 10 machine. I
had previously been testing Samba 3.0.24 (from packages on
www.sunfreeware.com) and have reused the smb.conf file. Otherwise
this is a clean setup, not an upgrade.
The server is configured as a PDC for my domain SAMBADOMAIN
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gaiseric Vandal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 16, 2007 5:01 PM
Subject: RPC Error with PC Netlink
To: samba@lists.samba.org
I have setup a Samba 3.024 server on Solaris. I have successfully
enabled two-way trusts between my samba domain and my legacy
is available for the SAMBA domain.
I tried Samba 3.0.25 - that seemed to just cause problems additional,
unreleasted issues. I also tried Samba 3.0.22- however it could not
read the previously created passwd.tbd file.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gaiseric Vandal [EMAIL PROTECTED
is available for the SAMBA domain.
I tried Samba 3.0.25 - that seemed to just cause problems additional,
unreleasted issues. I also tried Samba 3.0.22- however it could not
read the previously created passwd.tbd file.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gaiseric Vandal [EMAIL PROTECTED
is available for the SAMBA domain.
I tried Samba 3.0.25 - that seemed to just cause problems additional,
unreleasted issues. I also tried Samba 3.0.22- however it could not
read the previously created passwd.tbd file.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gaiseric Vandal [EMAIL PROTECTED
:36PM -0400, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
The samba machines and all windows machines are configured to use the
PCNL servers for WINS servers. The wins server have dymanic entries
for the Samba domain and PDC. I have also forced a replication
between the WINS servers to make sure
I have compiled Samba 3.0.22 on Solaris 10 (sparc.) It has been
configured as a PDC with a domain of, say, SAMBADOMAIN. It has
some predefined group mappings for the Administrators and Domain
Admins group. These mappings were dropped in later versions of Samba.
(I have been working with
trying to bring the Windows 2003 machines into general service than vice
versa.
-Original Message-
From: samba-bounces on Behalf Of Volker Lendecke
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 4:32 PM
To: Gaiseric Vandal
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] RPC Error with PC Netlink
trying to bring the Windows 2003 machines into general service than vice
versa.
-Original Message-
From: samba-bounces on Behalf Of Volker Lendecke
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 4:32 PM
To: Gaiseric Vandal
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] RPC Error with PC Netlink
On Mon
I have setup a Samba 3.024 server on Solaris. I have successfully
enabled two-way trusts between my samba domain and my legacy PC
Netlink domain. (PC Netlink is the solaris port of NT4 aka Advanced
Server for Unix.) My Samba domain includes 2 Windows 2003 Servers
(One is Windows 2003 SP1, the
601 - 695 of 695 matches
Mail list logo
