Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
72076 T?bingen
Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499
eMail: muel...@tropenklinik.de
Internet: www.tropenklinik.de
---
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Christopher R. Hertel
Daniel,
If we can reproduce the build bug, we will certainly work to fix it. The
vfs_glusterfs module is, however, fairly new so there has not been time to
produce useful documentation. If you would like to contribute
documentation, we'll be happy to review it. The Gluster VFS project is
/* HAVE_PUTUTLINE */
- End of forwarded message (env-from mickey) -
--
paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has
remained)
--
Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R
- the Common Internet FileSystem ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs
R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
guess was correct.
That is, Deep Mapping occurs on the client side.
Kewl stuff. Thanks!
Chris -)-
--
Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org
tinycc. I'm still puddling with
Samba4 on the NSLU2...
Chris -)-
--
Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx
/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=4885
--
Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org
ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in Poland ???
Time to set up shop and list yourself. :)
Chris -)-
--
Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx
upgrade to 3.0.4, but if you must
continue with the 2.2.x stream, then you should move to 2.2.9.
Could it be a Sun patch for Solaris?
--
Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http
-)-
--
Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED
for EA code... Add Linux interface.
Jeremy.
Just curious... Is this OS/2 style Extended Attributes?
Chris -)-
--
Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 09:12:31PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 04:00:02PM -0500, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 08:29:55PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu Jun 5 20:29:55 2003
Author: jra
Update of /data/cvs
://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
138.
Weird, yes. Still, that seems to be the way it was designed.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL
-)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:41:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please resend with a mailer that doesn't wrap at 80 columns :-).
Jeremy.
Looks more like 55 c
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:41:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please resend with a mailer that doesn't wrap at 80 columns :-).
Jeremy.
Looks more like 60 columns.
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org
the NetBIOS name to an address.
Note that it is dangerous to have a single node using multiple namespaces.
NBT was not designed to work that way, and conflicts can occur.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org
is the primary maintainer of libsmbclient) has applied a fix, which
should be in the current CVS.
Thanks!
Chris -)-
PS. Will you be at the Samba/eXPo conference?
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org
that shows
what I'm doing.
I need to finish this book thing this week, so I will have to catch up
later. Perhaps at SambaXP. I'll try not to ask too many questions. :)
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 05:43:55PM +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Thursday 27 March 2003 03:43 schrieb Christopher R. Hertel:
Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi!
I noticed a difference between testsmbc smb://MYGRP and testsmbc
smb://mygrp (it doesn't make a difference for SAMBA servers
would be good
metze
-
Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development
, true weeping is yet to come
-- Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds, The Weeping Song
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL
there are different
WINS serves) then you have two separate workgroups, both nmaed FOO.
Again, it's flakey, but it's the best I've been able to come up with.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org
://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,/* params, length, max */
NULL, 0, CLI_BUFFER_SIZE, /* data, length, max */
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http
address (which
interface, I suppose) will be used as the source address before sending
the datagram?
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http
Files:
client.c
Log Message:
Convert to popt.
Revisions:
client.c 1.238 = 1.239
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/client/client.c?r1=1.238r2=1.239
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http
.
Is this on anybody's To-Do list?
Ken
Ken Cross
Network Storage Solutions
Phone 865.675.4070 ext 31
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 01:14:29PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
Ken,
How would you store that information on a Unix filesystem? How do you
prevent users or other services from messing things up?
There are solutions, but it's
-)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, and they can be virtual interfaces so you only need one physical
interface.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL
/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to have a better understanding of the
situation above. At this point I'm just guessing...
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org
and,
well, that's why I am writing a book about how this stuff actually works.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org
that places everything over
the VPN Pipe except for 192.168.0.* addresses?
Unless you can change the client configuration yourself, yes.
Any thoughts?
This really isn't a Samba-Technical question.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team
book. ;l
file:///home/crh/work/docs/cifsdocs/SMB.html#SMB.7.2
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED
for your WINS database.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs
...
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL
that smbclient needs to be tested in this regard.
Chris -)-
PS. It would also be nice (hint to others on this list) if Ethereal were
patched to read these messed-up packets correctly. :)
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http
.
Thanks again!
We aims to please. :)
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http
from rsharpe regarding the
*SMBSERVER name not being tried?
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED
,
Peter Hurley
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL
was using
actually had a different meaning, was enlightening.
Most welcome.
As it happens, I am currently working on writing the Browsing section of
my online book, so the stuff is fairly fresh in my mind. :)
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
point of the NT_TRANSACT is to
allow transfers larger than 64K.
I imagine that SMB_COM_NT_TRANSACT is used with some of the more advanced
RPC calls. Am I anywhere close to the mark?
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http
://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
limited than, the concept of forks.
I had confused this concept with Extended File Attributes (arg!), which
have to do with 32-bit access masks and such. Fixed now.
When can we just make all of this go away?
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christopher R. Hertel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am interested in looking into this, but I won't have time until the
weekend.
...
In the mean time, I have modified smbw_dir.c to include a new function
on the remote machine.
This is typically done by sending a Node Status query and looking for a name
with a suffix byte value of 0x20.
More inline below...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher R. Hertel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Derrell,
Can you give me a better idea of what you
-)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a new VC=0 SessionSetup to fix this I think.
I will investigate further.
Jeremy.
===
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx
Document Center 332 (Using Latest PS Drivers)
The Version of Samba we are running is 2.2.7a
Server: Redhat Linux 8.0, + samba-2.2.7-2 RPM package (Latest/Greatest
Version)
---
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http
that the length of the SMB message can be
discovered. Ethereal will call this the NBT header even if you are
capturing port 445 (naked TCP transport).
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx
to avoid being hit a second time.
I've got a fourth-level wombat teaser that's +4 on musk.
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:54:00PM -0500, Kris Van Hees wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:39:26PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:59:58PM -0500, Kris Van Hees wrote:
I have a WinXP box that has plaintext password enabled. I have a Samba 3.0
CVS server
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:28:32PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:24:09AM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
I'm going to do a very brief writeup of NT_CREATE_ANDX, but I remember
hearing rumors dark lurking daemons. What do I need to know? What is there
about
info you can provide.
Hope that's somewhat useful.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook
info you can provide.
Hope that's somewhat useful.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook
://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, but how are oplocks are unreliable by definition?
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook
://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, but may be wrong there.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs
the data could be sorted
using the binary tree stuff or by qsort(). This should be fairly do-able.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org
this is
something we've solved elsewhere.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http
/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
docs on that.
Abartlet tells me that it's specific to NTLMSSP. My question, at this
point, is: how do the client and server know to use NTLMSSP?
Digging...
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org
not enable SMB packet signing (MAC signing). There's a different set
of registry variables for that. Perhaps they all interact with one
another...
Clues welcome.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org
in the NEGOTIATE_PROTOCOL_RESPONSE.
Confidentiality I've never seen happen.
You sent to a public list, so I *hope* you didn't want confidentiality.
;)
Thanks!
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq
code seems to confirm this, but I'm not
sure.
A tcpdump trace showing ports 137 and 139 would help.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http
). There are others missing as well.
You can't really count on Windows to register names for all of the
services. The services seem to come and go and move to other names and
such.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http
trouble, but I fixed it (somewhere around 2.2.6, I
think).
I'm using 2.2.1a shipped with RH connecting to the same version of Samba
over loopback.
Good catch. Newer versions should not have this bug.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS
need to do a bit of reading. See:
http://ubiqx.org/cifs/References.html
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL
like that!
:)
I knew you would.
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs
make you think of NDR. I would
not have recognized it, but others on the Team know this stuff so well
that it's second nature.
Have a great night,
I'll do my best. :)
You too.
Chridz -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http
/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:26:16PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
The SNIA doc provides information on Message Authentication Codes (MACs).
These are signatures contained in the SMB header.
Are these the same as Sign and Seal or are we
), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Work)
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs
I'm trying to figure out. The
problem, though, is in my presentation of the question.
More...
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:26:43PM +, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 12:41:34AM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
So, unless I'm totally insane, the likelihood of Kerberos auth
I *think* it's a rule that Kerberos authentication is always used with
SMB over TCP (port 445) and that Kerberos is *not* used with SMB over NBT
(port 139).
Am I wrong?
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 05:30:45AM +, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:13:38PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
I *think* it's a rule that Kerberos authentication is always used with
SMB over TCP (port 445) and that Kerberos is *not* used with SMB over NBT
(port
. Not on the client side, anyway.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs
to such things.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL
/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to NetBIOS? In the former case,
where would I look in the code to remove the NetBIOS header from the
packet?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx
, etc.).
They'd want -p to be authoritative, rather than just explicit. :)
Thanks!
Chris -)-
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:33:40AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:08:32AM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
So, smbclient should default to using port 139
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 02:23:13PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:51:24AM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
That would be great. Please also look at the -L option too, as that
should default to 139 as well. (Sort of... it's not necessary for listing
shares
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 09:29:04PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 08:40:45PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
Note also that none of the calls appear to work properly on port 445. If
the call is made on 445 a Windows server will respond, but the response
:
Protect nmbd against malformed reply packets. Some reports on the lists
showing these.
Jeremy.
Just curious... Are these the malformed replies from the W2K WINS server?
Mike Allen (jCIFS) noted these as well.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
-)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
++
|Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba /
|__/
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS
FAVOG
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs
That helps. Thanks!
I wonder why that never made it into the doc...
Chris -)-
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 07:36:56PM -0500, Green, Paul wrote:
Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] asked:
There doesn't seem to be any documentation regarding the CAP_NT_FIND
capability bit
, if Samba is interfering with the NT
domain.)
I'd love to get some hard data on this. Does anyone have a description of
what happens so I can reproduce it and get some traces?
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http
/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Avenida Dr. Mario Sacramento, n. 177
3810-106 AVEIRO
PORTUGAL
Phone: (+351) 234 372 075
Mobile: (+351) 914 644 883
Fax:(+351) 234 372 021
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:http://www.nec.pt
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:08:07AM +1030, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 03:17:05PM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
hi there,
I had some troubles while configuring a samba printer. The host
component of the netbios
the second one.
Thanks,
Lin
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team
then there's a bug in XP. The fact that the
alpha version of Samba excersizes the XP bug is something we will want to
fix, but XP shouldn't be rebooting on error.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo