Hello,
I'm just trying to compile latest release version of Samba downloaded
from samba.org and I'm getting these warnings. May I skip over?
It is just a little piece. It appears many times.
Compiling dynconfig.c
In file included from /usr/include/xfs/libxfs.h:38,
from
Gémes Géza wrote:
Sorry, but I don't agree. It can be usefull for Win9x clients, to have a
domain, because then they are able to logon to a WindowsNT Domain, and
thus having all the benefits, of logon scripts, roaming profiles, and
policies. So from this point of view they are a better choice
Markus Vorpahl wrote:
I applied the SignOrSeal registry change manually, but still no shares.
Until now, in smb.conf there was security = user set, so there was no domain
logon by the WIN98 stations either. Reading the text in
http://samba.kn.vutbr.cz/samba/devel/docs/html/domain-member.html:
Oliver Schulze L. wrote:
Hi.
In WinXP I can setup the permission of a file so that a user can modify
the file,
but he can not delete the file.
I wonder if this is posible in Linux + ACL patch + Samba 3.0 compilled
with --with-acl?
In posix ACL is no equivalent to Windows's enable/disable
Müller, Thorsten wrote:
But my winXP shows me (in security tab) not this new user mi!
Did i miss something during compiletime?
seems like you didn'y use --with-acl switch
Here's my output from ldd:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# ldd `which smbd`
libgssapi_krb5.so.2 =
Erlend Sannerud wrote:
Hi folks
I'm new to this list, fresh into linux and samba. Simply love it :-)
I have a customer that have about 10 XP pro machines connected to a
linux samba server. Since there are a quite few documents that only two
of the users are going to see, I use groups and
Holger Hecht wrote:
O.K., I am not bound to ReiserFS, but I want to use a journaling
file system
and ACLs. What filesystems would You recommend? Or does somebody know a
solution for the problem with the ReiserFS?
I'm using XFS (currently 2.4.21 vanilla with XFS 1.3 patch) and I can
Markus Vorpahl wrote:
Two questions concerning our small (six machines) network around a Samba
2.2.3a server:
I would recommend to go for upgrade (2.2.8a)
- I cannot make the XP home boxes find the samba server. We wanted to replace
some old desktops with new ones and bought them with XP home
Kevin Luff wrote:
All,
I have just installed Samba 3.0.0 under Mandrake Linux (Kernel 2.2.16)
on a SPARCstation5 and a SPARCserver1000
Mounts made available from Linux and Solaris boxes are working fine and
are mounted by the PC's.
However, when trying to mount a shared drive from my PC (Win
Hello,
I'm using Samba 2.2.7 + XFS (1.1) + ACL + quotas on a Linux machine with
kernel 2.4.18. What I want to ask you - is Samba's quota support
reliable enough so I can use it at commercial environment ? (I'm asking
because of experimental flag at --with-quota in Samba .configure file)
Hello again (I hope it's not too much to have two questions in one day :),
Currently I'm testing quota support on Linux system with kernel 2.4.18 +
XFS 1.1 patch + Samba 2.2.7 (--with-quota compiled) and I went into one
really unpleasant problem when accesing Samba share from Windows 2000
SP3
11 matches
Mail list logo
