-
From: David Brodbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 4:23 PM
To: EXT-Auleta, Michael; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] Re: Apostrophes in Windows usernames (again)
-Original Message-
From: EXT-Auleta, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think I've narrowed
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 5:10 PM
To: EXT-Auleta, Michael
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: Apostrophes in Windows usernames (again)
Could this also be a result of bug 1221?
Mark
I think I've narrowed down my problem, but I still don't know where to fix
it. It appears
I think I've narrowed down my problem, but I still don't know where to fix it. It
appears that scanning the
users.map file strips out the apostrophes and the Windows ID never matches:
[2004/06/01 16:23:51, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(521)
user_in_list: checking user o'brienta in list
I saw the posting for the attached issue from Dec 8, 2003 and made the changes to
smbd/password.c
and include/smb.h but am still having a problem with a user attaching to our Samba
server with an
apostrophe in his name. We use a usermap file and it looks like the apostrophe is
being stripped
If I have a Samba server that is part of a Windows 2000 domain and is not a domain
controller (all of our
authentication goes against a Windows 2000 box), do I need to upgrade to 3.0.4/2.2.9?
What is the interaction
between a Samba server that is part of a domain and the Windows client if all
I've just upgraded the version of Samba we're running from 2.2.2 to 3.0.2a and am
seeing an issue with permissions on directories. Users can still map the shares that
are set up, but cannot access the directories within those shares. This is also not
consistent; it's not happening to all
of the group owner of the directories.
-Original Message-
From: Jose Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:03 PM
To: EXT-Auleta, Michael; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] Upgrade directory permissions
What is the umask setting in the smb.conf file