Getting timeouts trying to go to: http://websvn.samba.org/
---
Andrew C. Eshmail:Andrew_Esh[at]adaptec.com
Adaptec, Inc.
2905 Northwest Blvd., Suite 20763-557-9005 (main)
Plymouth, MN 55441-2644 USA 763-551-6418 (direct)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
You should note that the ACL system and the Unix permission bits are two
different things. What you are actually talking about is the translation
between the two.
If the ACL system has Execute permission set for the user, then that user
should be able to execute the program on the client. That
What is Windows is using to determine that it needs to do the
executability test? There is no executable bit in Windows. There is the
ACL entry, but nothing at the DOS level. That is, unless they are testing
the file extension.
What Windows would need is a marker that enables a file for
To: 'Jim McDonough'; Esh, Andrew
Cc: John H Terpstra; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nick Drouet;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Users able to execute windows .exe though execute bit not
set
-Original Message-
From: Jim McDonough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The unix x bit is a perfectly
Maybe use the -A option to cvs update, to clear any sticky tags that might
be applied to your files. Such tags would prevent the latest code from being
downloaded.
-Original Message-
From: James Willard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:52 PM
To: 'Jelmer Vernooij'
I did this in a May 17th cut of in 2.2.x, which was right around the 2.2.4
release. I didn't submit a patch, because I didn't think there were that
many people using a file system that has extended attributes.
NOTE: Need to define lp_store_dos_mode config option and pick a name for
It's probably a line count thing. The head of the patch contains a certain
range of lines that the patch should apply to. If you truncated the patch at
the bottom, the header could be telling patch it needs to add, for example,
30 lines, while the patch text only contains 28.
Go back to the email
Better yet: Have winbindd fork the same way smbd does, on a per-client
basis.
Someone should probably figure out what quality of the example network
caused winbindd to consume so many sockets. Are there really that many
requests being queued up at once? Shifting to a forking model would simply
);
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
'Esh, Andrew';
'Ronan Waide'; STEFFENS,MICHAEL (HP-Germany,ex1); 'Richard Sharpe';
'John H Terpstra'; GILCHRIST,KIM (HP-NewZealand,ex1)
Subject: RE: Winbind on HPUX 11, some small progress
Hi Miles,
reading further;
change you link
Nice description Simo. It caused me to think.
I can see two cases for the use of such a union. The first is where the user
wants to make a foreground overlay which they can edit, where files are made
read-write by copying from the background to the foreground. This appears
the same as a normal
For Arthur Barrett's purpose, it seems preferring the Read-Write
user-specific directory over the common one would be best. If the user
checks out a file and want to edit it, they should be able to. Until they
check it back in, they should see the file which has their changes in their
share. This
The following article implies that Microsoft is selling licenses for CIFS,
as if they control the ownership of that protocol:
http://www.byteandswitch.com/document.asp?doc_id=27508
My understanding is that CIFS is an open protocol, and it is characterized
as such by Microsoft on this page:
Did I miss something? Is LDAP supposed to replace winbindd in nsswitch.conf?
If so, then what I've written below is not right, but read it anyway.
Perhaps LDAP is not finding winbindd in it's list of things to query.
My experience is not with HPUX, but I have been able to use passwd: files
-Original Message-
From: Jean Francois Micouleau
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:53 PM
To: Pagani Jr, Ronald
Cc: Gerald (Jerry) Carter; Esh, Andrew;
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: DOS mode bits missing from Folders
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003
New feature added to Ethereal, available via their CVS. SMB Round Trip Time
calculation. It will be in the next release after 0.9.9.
(Screen shot attached. MUST SEE!)
-Original Message-
From: Ronnie Sahlberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 8:31 PM
To: [EMAIL
The e(X)exute bits are special on folders. For example, if you remove the
archive (user 'x' bit) from a directory, you will not be able to change to
that directory.
The DOS mode bit stuff really needs a better solution.
Yes, thanks.
The problem is: The code change I am suggesting is in the
Title: DOS mode bits missing from Folders
I have a question about the following piece of code in HEAD smbd/dosmode.c, at line 139:
if (S_ISDIR(sbuf-st_mode))
result = aDIR | (result aRONLY);
This causes the DOS mode HSA Hidden, System, and Archive bits to be stripped off if a folder
Title: RE: Samba, nmblookup, wrong bcast address?
Your net mask is wrong.
You state that it's set to 255.255.255.xxx, but the debug output shows 255.255.-225-.xxx. nmblookup is broadcasting to the wrong network.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
be shown. That's what I would like to say.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Esh, Andrew
To: 'Steve Langasek' ; AndyChu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 3:41 AM
Subject: RE: ntfs issue
(I assume you're asking about serving an NTFS partition via Samba
Title: RE: ntfs issue
(I assume you're asking about serving an NTFS partition via Samba, which is being hosted on a non-Windows OS which is capable of mounting NTFS partitions.)
You'd have to depend on the quality of the NTFS support on the OS of the host which is running Samba. It may not
(Please take this to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it's not a
development issue.)
Try
defining the IP address for "CAT" in your /etc/lmhosts file. Your WINS server
may not be supplying good information. Also, try to ping CAT at its IP address.
It doesn't appear to be reachable from where the Samba
Title: MSLinux!?!?!?
Microsoft to offer Linux software?
In a major strategy shift, Microsoft Corp. will introduce software based on the Linux open source operating system in 2004 ...
(Copyrighted article, or I'd post it. Here's a link: )
(Please take this to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it's not a
development issue.)
Try
defining the IP address for "CAT" in your /etc/lmhosts file. Your WINS server
may not be supplying good information. Also, try to ping CAT at its IP address.
It doesn't appear to be reachable from where the Samba
Title: RE: Comparing SAMBA_3_0 to HEAD
Rather than use two trees, just check out HEAD and do a cvs diff -r SAMBA_3_0. That will show you everything which is different between your sandbox, and the revision specified with -r. The revision can be a tag, or a date.
-Original Message-
Title: RE: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down
Here at Tricord, we run Samba through some pretty intense tests, as well. Since we are a file system producer, we focus on corruption bugs. We haven't found any in Samba, other than a rather famous Microsoft Word bug that also occurs on Windows
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Esh, Andrew
Cc: 'John H Terpstra'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mathew
McKernan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down
Esh, Andrew wrote:
Here at Tricord, we run Samba through some
Title: RE: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down
I tend to focus on absurdities. They lead to interesting results.
-Original Message-
From: Philip Burrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:22 PM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba]
Title: RE: How Samba let us down
One way to check this would be to download Ethereal (a packet capturing product endorsed and supported by many Samba users and developers), and capture some traffic on the network. Ethereal is free, easy to use, has Windows and Linux versions, and can be had
Title: RE: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down
Here at Tricord, we run Samba through some pretty intense tests, as well. Since we are a file system producer, we focus on corruption bugs. We haven't found any in Samba, other than a rather famous Microsoft Word bug that also occurs on Windows
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Esh, Andrew
Cc: 'John H Terpstra'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mathew
McKernan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down
Esh, Andrew wrote:
Here at Tricord, we run Samba through some
Title: RE: Eliminating gettimeofday from construct_reply
In the Samba profile results, the last column is the total time spent within the named routine, since profiling was started. Divide by the number of calls to get the average time per call.
-Original Message-
From: Green, Paul
Title: RE: New sam system
They are not encrypted, they are simply signed. The problem is, it attaches them to the email as a separate attachment. Some email readers don't automatically display certain attachments, so the main body of the message is all that is displayed. Since there isn't one
Title: RE: write list parameter in 2.2.5?
How about setting valid users with the same list?
-Original Message-
From: Eddie Lania [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 5:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: write list parameter in 2.2.5?
Sorry to drop this on
Title: RE: rerun autoconf ?
No, autoconf creates configure using configure.ac or configure.in as input. (Edit autoconf for more info, it's a script.) The configure script is included with the source code as a convenience.
You want to run autoconf first, then ./configure, then make.
Title: RE: I/M Beta Test
Why does this smell like a hack troll?
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Frederico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 6:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I/M Beta Test
Sorry to post this here because it has NOTHING to do with samba
Title: RE: Draft of branch maintainence and release plans
That's the same code I'm talking about. I have it running.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Potter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:10 AM
To: Esh, Andrew
Cc: Gerald Carter; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Title: RE: [Draft #2] Samba 3.0 roadmap...
About a year ago I suggested this and was told that something was being done about it. My impression was that there were some ideas about how to implement it, and work was in progress. It was suggested that I wait.
I'd like to pick up the thread on
Title: RE: [Samba] RE: FW: samba woes
Why not make Samba LDAP aware, so that it can work with any LDAP server. Then, put an LDAP interface on Winbindd, so it can be queried by any client. Eventually, I think Winbindd would go away in favor of plain LDAP.
BTW, this is the suggested solution
) at
lib/fault.c:6161
fault_report(sig);(gdb) #4 0x1333b8 in sig_fault (sig=11) at
lib/fault.c:6161
fault_report(sig);(gdb) stepSingle stepping until exit from function
strftime, which has no line number information.timestring (hires=1) at
lib/time.c:689689
slprintf(TimeBuf+strlen(
Title: RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
Don't step at that point. The process has already run the CPU into the wrong segment, or accessed memory using a bad pointer. Stepping will only destroy information.
Do a 'bt' instead. That will dump the call stack, and
Title: RE: Samba and Netatalk
Last time I looked at that code (two weeks ago?) in the 2.2 branch, it wasn't being called anywhere.
-Original Message-
From: Max Bidlingmaier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 5:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Samba and
Title: RE: CIFS Load Generator source available ...
I ran into a compile problem on Linux Redhat 7.1. Here is a patch that fixes it.
Index: include/config.h.in
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/cifs-load-gen/source/include/config.h.in,v
Title: RE: What happened to CIFS Technical Reference at SNIA?
It looks like this might be the equivalent (and future?) place for the file, but it doesn't appear to be there:
http://www.snia.org/tech_activities/workgroups/nas/docs/
-Original Message-
From: Christopher R. Hertel
qbuf, rbuf)) {goto
done;}
/* Unmarshall response
*/
if (!samr_io_r_query_userinfo("", r,
rbuf, 0)) {goto
done;}
-Original Message-From: Osman Tufanogullari (Garanti
Teknoloji) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 20,
2002 10:51 AMTo: Esh, Andrew;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Su
Title: RE: Large file size issues with Samba client.
An 18.4 Exabyte realmedia file? Must be one of Jeremy Allison's ACL discussions.
That number is interesting. If you subtract it from 2^64, you get 1,932,534,103. If that number is added to the other reported file size (2,307,064*1024),
Title: RE: wbinfo -t and Win2K DCs ...
This doesn't match my results. I get good wbinfo replies when I have Samba 2.2.3a joined into a Win2K domain. In fact, we did a bunch of domain controller failure testing in such a domain, to make sure we had our solution right. We didn't see any
Title: RE: PATCH: VFS audit.c module
Wouldn't a better fix be to replace the NULLs in vfs.c with calls to a function like vfs_do_nothing, which always returns false or NULL? That way no one working on code outside of the vfs wrapper code has to remember to test the function pointers.
Title: RE: Network connection braking after a while
I'm not so sure it's the same.
German-to-English(Netzwerkpfad wurde nicht gefunden.) == Network path not found.
I get that all the time when Windows can't connect to Samba. I see it with authentication failures, and when the smbd
Title: RE: Very bad performance when copying large files from windows to samba-share
If this were me (and most of you are probably glad it is not), I'd synch the clocks, start Samba at log level 10 (unlimited log size), mount the share from Windows, and let it sit for a few minutes. This will
49 matches
Mail list logo
