Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:43:18 +
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jan Houstek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Samba technical list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problems with ACLs in
2.2.8 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; +0100
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type:
Michael Steffens wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Mandel wrote:
I found this is office 2000 v 9.3821 SR1 (not the latest)
We are trying to load the latest office update to see if that fixes
it first. Is anybody experiencing this with samba later than 9.4402
SR1 or on the latest version, whatever
trace from 12327:
(gdb) bt
#0 0xfecd9794 in __sigprocmask () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
#1 0xfecce1e8 in _deliversigs () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
#2 0xfecd05c4 in thr_sigsetmask () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
#3 signal handler called
#4 0xb in ?? ()
#5 0xfecdb1f0 in usleep () from
I have seen this problem crop up recently with 2.2.7a and Win2k. Never
saw this before win2k.
It looks the same as mentioned in the previous post.
posthttp://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/2003-January/041748.html
File starts out
rw-rw--- usera groupa
ends up
r--r userb groupb
Esh, Andrew wrote:
Also, try loading a few other non-Samba programs into gdb, to see what they
require. Maybe threading is a common library to load.
I have tried this against sshd, httpd, radiusd and lpsched. None are
showing libthread anywhere in the list of symbols.
After latest
(argc=0, argv=0xffbefeac) at smbd/server.c:832
(gdb) The program is running. Quit anyway (and detach it)? (y or n) y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 09:07:23AM -0800, Jeff Mandel wrote:
I have followed this fcntl bug closely, and I just applied a T-patch for
solaris 8 which
I have been trying to get the bug fix from Sun, and based on the trusses
I have sent, they believe that the problem I'm having is not the same as
that reported in the bug 4700402. They are working on those trusses now.
From my experience with this problem and the way I've seen others
describe
Since the recent announcement for the 2.2.7 release, I looked again for
solaris binaries. For a while there were packages up to 2.2.4. After
2.2.5 came out the others vanished and 2.2.2 and 2.0.7 were left. Are
you still planning to keep packages for solaris on the samba site?
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 13:14:41 +
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Johannes Tyve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: System documentation of Samba
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:59:36AM +0200, Johannes Tyve wrote:
One of our servers crashed and when we booted it again one Samba
David Collier-Brown wrote:
Jeff Mandel wrote:
Could you provide some details the bug in Solaris? 2.2.2 used to work
fine for me, but recently it has fallen apart. 2.2.5 behaves the same. I
can think of a recent jumbo patch cluster installation that might be to
blame, but I'd like to know
I've been troubleshooting a cpu race condition that looks like a problem
that's been around for a while on solaris.
I upgraded to 2.2.5 and was unable to get any handle on what could cause
this, I downgraded to 2.2.2 which was the last one I could remember
working well for us and got this
Simo Sorce wrote:
3) The valadation doesn't really validate in this case since the value
used is not what the sytem returned: \jeff != jeff, but the check in
reply.c is only for != NULL. When this gets looked up the the samba
password db, failure is certain. There's no \jeff in the samba
,
but by smbd. How would the shell come into play in those instances?
Jeff
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 11:21, Jeff Mandel wrote:
2) The wacky thing here is that \user actually returns successful with NIS.
jeff@host% getent passwd jeff
jeff:x:6789:6789::/export/home/jeff:/bin/ksh
jeff
Using samba as a PDC, logins from win98 don't seem to send a domain name
with the user name when using a domain login. As a result, there's some
kind of null domain which causes a leading slash to be prepended to the
user name. I believe this is the separator character of domain\user
syntax.
14 matches
Mail list logo
