Re: [Samba] samba slow and several Write andx Request

2010-09-06 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Thursday, September 02, 2010 08:40:55 pm grant little's cat walking on the 
keyboard wrote:
 That's a really old version of Samba to be running on Ubuntu seems like you
 might be running also a very old version of ubuntu itself.
 Ubuntu 9.10 was running 3.4.0 as I recall and 10.04 is on 3.4.7 3.0.28 is
 not even recommended for windows 7
 http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7
 so you will soon hit that wall as well.
 Perhaps the issues you are having are fixed in later releases?


Thanks,
it turned out to be the always sync option that made the sahre working so 
slow. However I will upgrade samba as soon as possible.

Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


[Samba] samba slow and several Write andx Request

2010-09-02 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi all,
I'm running version 3.0.28a on Ubuntu linux, and apparently from a day to 
another I got performance issues: without any change in smb.conf (except a few 
added shares) I have mac osx and linux clients getting a very slow 
upload/download speed. I've checked with other protocols, like scp and 
performances are good, so I can exclude a network/hardware problem.
Other clients are still running fast (e.g., windows xp). Looking at a 
transmission dump I see a lot of Write Andx Request packages (and replies) 
all moving the data offset by 64 bytes, that I suspect is the cause for the 
slowing down speed. Is there some option or somehting I can investigate more?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] windows 7 share and smbclient

2010-01-25 Thread Luca Ferrari
In the case it can be useful, this is a debug trace of the session to the 
windows 7 share (maybe the final message SPNEGO login failed: Invalid 
parameter can lead to a solution):

smbclient -d 7 //s28/backupinfook -U backup 
 
INFO: Current debug levels: 
 
  all: True/7   
 
  tdb: False/0  
 
  printdrivers: False/0 
 
  lanman: False/0   
 
  smb: False/0  
 
  rpc_parse: False/0
 
  rpc_srv: False/0  
 
  rpc_cli: False/0  
 
  passdb: False/0   
 
  sam: False/0  
 
  auth: False/0 
 
  winbind: False/0  
 
  vfs: False/0  
 
  idmap: False/0
 
  quota: False/0
 
  acls: False/0 
 
  locking: False/0  
 
  msdfs: False/0
 
  dmapi: False/0
 
  registry: False/0 
 
lp_load_ex: refreshing parameters   
 
Initialising global parameters  
 
params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file /etc/samba/smb.conf 
 
Processing section [global]   
 
doing parameter workgroup = WORKGROUP   
 
doing parameter server string = %h server (Samba, Ubuntu)   
 
doing parameter dns proxy = no  
 
doing parameter log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
 
doing parameter max log size = 1000 
 
doing parameter syslog = 0  
 
doing parameter panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d 
 
doing parameter encrypt passwords = true
 
doing parameter passdb backend = tdbsam 
 
doing parameter obey pam restrictions = yes 
 
doing parameter unix password sync = yes
 
doing parameter 

[Samba] windows 7 share and smbclient

2010-01-22 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
I've tested that samba (smbclient 3.4) cannot connect to a windows 7 share but 
however it is possible to mount such share with smbmount.
When I try to connect specifying username and password I got a success but 
nothing happens:

smbclient //s28/backupinfook -U backup
Enter backup's password:   
session setup failed: SUCCESS - 0   

while from another windows machine I can connect to the share. When I mount 
the share with smbmount I can browse its content. So there is something 
working different between an smbmount and an smbclient. What can I do if I 
don't want to mount the share?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] dabase file and oplocks

2008-09-24 Thread Luca Ferrari
I've tried to use the options sync always and strict sync, but nothing 
changed. I compiled the 3.2.4 on the linux client machine and mounted the 
exported file system using cifs, but nothing changed. Still the data on the 
server is corrupted, as the program cannot get the lock on the files.
I've also tried to swtich on and off the oplocks, without any difference. In 
the previous versions of samba (3.0.2) it worked, so I don't understand what 
could be the different configuration. Anyone has an idea?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] dabase file and oplocks

2008-09-24 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Wednesday 24 September 2008 Luca Ferrari's cat, walking on the keyboard, 
wrote:
 I've tried to use the options sync always and strict sync, but nothing
 changed. I compiled the 3.2.4 on the linux client machine and mounted the
 exported file system using cifs, but nothing changed. Still the data on the
 server is corrupted, as the program cannot get the lock on the files.
 I've also tried to swtich on and off the oplocks, without any difference.
 In the previous versions of samba (3.0.2) it worked, so I don't understand
 what could be the different configuration. Anyone has an idea?


I also discovered that the Dataflex is writing the indexes but not the data 
related to the archive. In the samba logs I don't see anything strange: I've 
got a connection to the share from the user and a close connection.

Anything I can search for?

Luca


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] dabase file and oplocks

2008-09-23 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 Luca Ferrari's cat, walking on the keyboard, 
wrote:
 Hi all,
 I'm using a Linux server (A) with samba 3.0.28 which exports a directory
 that contains database files (Dataflex .dat files) and that are mounted by
 a Linux machine (B) that runs Samba 3.0.2. Now the problem is that the
 files are corrupted when accessed by the machine B, even if the machine A
 exports the directory with oplocks = no, kernel oplocks = no and level2
 oplocks = no. Before upgrading the samba on the server A I did not have
 such problem (before I was running samba 3.0.2). Now I'm experiencing this
 problem in data corruption. Any suggestion about how to get rid of this? Or
 how to better investigate and understand what is going wrong? What I've
 seen is that it seems the database is unable to get the lock on the files,
 since it allows two write at the same time with, of course, unpredictable
 results. I don't know what other configuration/experiment I can do.


After an upgrade of the samba libraries on the ubuntu system it seems to work 
better, but sometimes I still have a little misbehaving between the two 
hosts, and data that is present on the main server is still not visible on 
the remote host or vice-versa. Seems a problem of flushing, any idea about?

Thanks,
Luca

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] dabase file and oplocks

2008-09-16 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi all,
I'm using a Linux server (A) with samba 3.0.28 which exports a directory that 
contains database files (Dataflex .dat files) and that are mounted by a Linux 
machine (B) that runs Samba 3.0.2. Now the problem is that the files are 
corrupted when accessed by the machine B, even if the machine A exports the 
directory with oplocks = no, kernel oplocks = no and level2 oplocks = no. 
Before upgrading the samba on the server A I did not have such problem 
(before I was running samba 3.0.2). Now I'm experiencing this problem in data 
corruption. Any suggestion about how to get rid of this? Or how to better 
investigate and understand what is going wrong? What I've seen is that it 
seems the database is unable to get the lock on the files, since it allows 
two write at the same time with, of course, unpredictable results. I don't 
know what other configuration/experiment I can do.

Thanks for help,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] recycle not working

2008-09-04 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
I've included the following configuration parameters in a share of mine:

vfs objects = recycle
recycle:repository  = /mnt/cestino_samba_NAS/%u_%U
recycle:repository  = /mnt/cestino_samba_NAS/%u_%U
recycle:maxsize = 10
recycle:exclude = *.tmp,*.temp *.mp3 *.avi *.mpg *.mp4 *.~??
recycle:keeptree= yes
recycle:directory_mode = 0765
recycle:touch   = yes


but it does not work. Anyone has an idea of what I'm doing wrong? And when can 
I check for errors or clues?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] deny file storing through a name filter

2008-07-25 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi all,
is there a way to deny samba to accept incoming files of a certain type or 
with a name that matches against a pattern? For example, if I'd like to do 
not allow *.mp3 files on a share.

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] deny file storing through a name filter

2008-07-25 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Friday 25 July 2008 Volker Lendecke's cat, walking on the keyboard, wrote:
 On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:08:56PM +0200, Luca Ferrari wrote:
  Hi all,
  is there a way to deny samba to accept incoming files of a certain type
  or with a name that matches against a pattern? For example, if I'd like
  to do not allow *.mp3 files on a share.

 smb.conf option veto files


I've tried, it works! Thanks, I thought veto files was only to hide files.

Lucaù


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] write list vs read list

2008-04-17 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Monday 14 April 2008 Chris Smith's cat, walking on the keyboard, wrote:

 It looks to me like you have multiple smb.conf files and you're editing
 the one the system is not using. Your last testparm still shows
 a force group parameter but there is none listed in your share
 definition. Also available is on by default, one less parameter you
 can drop to make it all more readable.

I found the problemyou were almost right, except it was not another 
smb.conf file, but the same share defined twice in the file. Removed one of 
the definiton and now everything works!

Thanks,
Luca


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] write list vs read list

2008-04-14 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Friday 11 April 2008 Chris Smith's cat, walking on the keyboard, wrote:

 [LABORATORIO_SMB]
 comment   = Cartella privata Laboratorio
 path  = /mnt/samba/lab_smb
 browsable = yes
 valid users   = @laboratorio, @estero
 write list= @laboratorio
 read only = yes


No way! I've tried to change my configuration to the following:

[LABORATORIO_SMB]
comment   = Cartella privata Laboratorio
path  = /mnt/samba/lab_smb
browsable = yes
available = yes
valid users   = @laboratorio, @estero, luca.ferrari
write list= @laboratorio
read list = @estero, luca.ferrari
writable  = yes

but the testparm still says:

[LABORATORIO_SMB]
comment = Cartella Laboratorio Sassuolo
path = /mnt/samba/laboratorio_smb
valid users = @laboratorio
read list = @estero, luca.ferrari
write list = @laboratorio
force group = laboratorio
read only = No

so the valid users property is not changed, and in fact I'm not able to log in 
to the share with an account not belonging to the laboratorio group.
Is there something I can check or do to get rid of this problem?

Thanks,
Luca

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] write list vs read list

2008-04-11 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Thursday 10 April 2008 Luca Ferrari's cat, walking on the keyboard, wrote:

 Uhm..I've checked the file permissions, and since they are 777 I guess this
 is not the problem. Moreover, since I've got a NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED I
 think that it is something that prevents users to access the share at all.
 Any suggestion?

It is strange, this is the definition of the share:

[LABORATORIO_SMB]
comment   = Cartella privata Laboratorio
path  = /mnt/samba/lab_smb
browsable = yes
available = yes
valid users   = @laboratorio @estero luca.ferrari
write list= @laboratorio
read list = @estero luca.ferrari
writable  = yes
printable = no
force group   = laboratorio

where I've added myself to the valid and read list. Then I forced a reload of 
the configuration:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# /etc/init.d/samba reload
 * Reloading /etc/samba/smb.conf...

but if I check the configuration with testparm I got:

[LABORATORIO_SMB]
comment = Cartella Laboratorio Sassuolo
path = /mnt/samba/laboratorio_smb
valid users = @laboratorio
read list = @estero, luca.ferrari
write list = @laboratorio
force group = laboratorio
read only = No

as you can see the luca.ferrari user is not added to the valid users list! 
This could be the problem that such user always gets a 
NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED???
Any suggestion?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] write list vs read list

2008-04-10 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Wednesday 9 April 2008 your cat, walking on the keyboard, wrote:
  However, the @estero group cannot access the share at all
  (NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED). What am I doing wrong?

 Most likely the filesystem permissions prevent users in @estero from
 executing or reading the /home/samba/lab_smb folder and/or the files in
 it.

Uhm..I've checked the file permissions, and since they are 777 I guess this is 
not the problem. Moreover, since I've got a NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED I think 
that it is something that prevents users to access the share at all.
Any suggestion?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] problems setting a public share

2008-04-09 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Wednesday 9 April 2008 your cat, walking on the keyboard, wrote:
 you will need to show us your entire config, not just the share

 do you have a map to guest line? does your guest user exist?


[global]
netbios name  = SEDELDAP
workgroup = LDAP
security = user
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost/
obey pam restrictions = no
ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=MyHost,dc=com
ldap suffix = dc=MyHost,dc=com
ldap group suffix = ou=Group
ldap user suffix = ou=People
ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers
ldap idmap suffix = ou=Users
ldap ssl = off
domain logons = yes
follow symlinks = yes
wide links = yes
unix extensions = no
map to guest = Bad User
guest account = guest.samba

[PUB_SMB]
comment   = Cartella pubblica (Mac e PC) - Non viene fatto il 
backup
path  = /mnt/samba/pub_smb
browsable = yes
available = yes
writable  = yes
printable = no
force group   = pub
public  = yes
guest ok  = yes

Please note that the user guest.samba belongs to the pub group, the 
permissions are right:

# id guest.samba
uid=1035(guest.samba) gid=513(Domain Users) groups=513(Domain Users),1002
(sassuolo),1050(pub)
# ls -ld /mnt/samba/pub_smb/
drwxrwxrwx 114 guest.samba pub 4096 2008-04-08 21:50 /mnt/samba/pub_smb/

However, if I try to log in specifying the guest.samba account, then I 
succeed, but if I try to login without specifying a username, then I got a 
NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED.

smbclient //sedeldap/pub_smb 
WARNING: The printer admin option is deprecated
Password:
Domain=[LDAP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.26a]
tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED

and if I try to login as guest.samba (or another registered user) I got access 
to the share.

Any idea?


Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] write list vs read list

2008-04-09 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
I'd like to set a share as writable for a specific users' group, and only 
readable for another, so I did the following:



[global]
netbios name      = SEDELDAP
workgroup = LDAP
security = user
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost/
obey pam restrictions = no
ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=MyHost,dc=com
ldap suffix = dc=MyHost,dc=com
ldap group suffix = ou=Group
ldap user suffix = ou=People
ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers
ldap idmap suffix = ou=Users
ldap ssl = off
domain logons = yes
follow symlinks = yes
wide links = yes
unix extensions = no
map to guest = Bad User
guest account = guest.samba

[LABORATORIO_SMB]
comment   = Cartella privata Laboratorio
path  = /mnt/samba/lab_smb
browsable = yes
available = yes
valid users   = @laboratorio @estero
write list= @laboratorio
read list = @estero
writable  = yes
printable = no
force group   = laboratorio

However, the @estero group cannot access the share at all 
(NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED). What am I doing wrong?

Thanks,
Luca
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] problems setting a public share

2008-04-09 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Wednesday 9 April 2008 Michael Heydon's cat, walking on the keyboard, 
wrote:
 SMB connections always have a username (when using user level security).
 Is there a user called guest on the server? Is $USER set on the client
 machine?


The user guest exists, I've tried to set the password to none (-n option of 
smbpasswd) and now I can enter the samba server also without specifying a 
user (if I specify a non-existent username, as you suggested, I can enter the 
share).

Thanks a lot for your suggestions.
I've got only another doubt: being public the share, is there a possibility to 
block access to a few users or machines in an ip list? Can I work with such 
parameters in a guest ok share?


Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] problems setting a public share

2008-04-08 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi all,
my samba server has security set to user, and it works for each share I 
specify a valid users list. However, the following public share does not 
work:

[PUB_SMB]
comment   = Cartella pubblica (Mac e PC) - Non viene fatto il 
backup
path  = /mnt/samba/pub_smb
browsable = yes
available = yes
writable  = yes
printable = no
force group   = pub
guest ok  = yes
public= yes

I found in the logs that 
make_connection: connection to PUB_SMB denied due to security descriptor.

If I connect to the share authenticating as a user I can log-in, but as a 
guest no. I've tried to delete the file /var/lib/samba/share_info.tbd, but 
once I try to reconnect the file appears again, and even when the file is 
absent I cannot connect to the share.

Any idea?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] mac os x samba: refresh problem

2008-04-08 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi all,
is it possible to force a refresh of Samba shares opened from a mac osx? If 
two mac users work on the same share and put files in it, then the other user 
cannot see the former's files until reconnecting to the share. I've tried 
even with a Finder-Refresh extension, but it does not work. I believe this is 
a more related OS-X problem, but I hope someone else has experience in this 
area.

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Fwd: Re: [Samba] failed to add domain dn= sambaDomainName

2008-03-19 Thread Luca Ferrari

On Tuesday 18 March 2008 your cat, walking on the keyboard, wrote:
 did you run smbldap-populate?


Ops...I figured put: for any strange reason the ldap schema was missing from 
the ldap configuration file. I guess it was a wrong update. Now the system is 
working.

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] failed to add domain dn= sambaDomainName

2008-03-18 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
I'm trying to configure my samba server to work with the ldap system on the 
same host. The samba domain name is LDAP, but when I try to start samba I 
cannot and in the log I found:

[2008/03/18 11:12:14, 1] lib/smbldap_util.c:add_new_domain_info(216)
  add_new_domain_info: failed to add domain dn= 
sambaDomainName=LDAP,dc=myHost,dc=com with: Invalid DN syntax
invalid DN

Where can be the problem? Both in /etc/samba/smb.conf 
and /etc/smbldap-tools/smbldap.conf the domain name is set to LDAP.

Thanks,
Luca

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE with ldap backend

2008-02-27 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Tuesday 26 February 2008 Adam Williams's cat, walking on the keyboard, 
wrote:
 did you run smbldap-populate?  even with a user in ldap, that is for
 their posix (linux shell) account.  you will still need to run smbpasswd
 -a user to add their samba NT and LM hashes and samba SID info to ldap.


Thanks Adam,
populating and using smbpasswd -a solved the problem, but now I'm a bit 
confused: if I want to change my users' info (password, etc) I need to use 
the smbldap-xxx scripts and that will change both the samba and ldap (unix) 
information? In other ways, the needing for a smbpasswd -a is required only 
as init step, or each time I change a password I need to use again 
smbpasswd? Moreover, what happens if I change a password using smbpasswd and 
not the smbldap-xxx? The samba account becomes unaligned with the ldap one?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE with ldap backend

2008-02-26 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Monday 25 February 2008 Luca Ferrari's cat, walking on the keyboard, wrote:
 Hi all,
 I've configured my samba server to work with my ldap backend, the
 configuration of ldap is correct and in fact my users can interactively
 login. The problem is with samba, that is always returning a
 NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE when a user tries to access a share. I'm in doubt
 if I have to add ldap accounts through the ldap-tools of samba or not, at
 the moment I did not add any account to samba (thinking it should read them
 from the ldap server directly). In the logs I'm not able to find anything
 useful, does anyone have any clue?

I found that the server is connecting right to the ldap server:

[2008/02/26 17:06:45, 3] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_connect_system(997)
  ldap_connect_system: succesful connection to the LDAP server


but that the user trying to authenticate does not exists:

[2008/02/26 17:06:45, 3] auth/auth_sam.c:check_sam_security(281)
  check_sam_security: Couldn't find user 'luca' in passdb.
[2008/02/26 17:06:45, 5] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(273)
  check_ntlm_password: sam authentication for user [luca] FAILED with error 
NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER


The problem is that if I try to create the user with the smbldap-useradd I got 
the error:
Error looking for next uid at /usr/share/perl5/smbldap_tools.pm line 1044.

Now, two questions:
1) why do I have to add accounts to samba if it should get them from the ldap 
server?
2) how to solve the problem of the smbldap-useradd?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE with ldap backend

2008-02-25 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi all,
I've configured my samba server to work with my ldap backend, the 
configuration of ldap is correct and in fact my users can interactively 
login. The problem is with samba, that is always returning a 
NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE when a user tries to access a share. I'm in doubt if 
I have to add ldap accounts through the ldap-tools of samba or not, at the 
moment I did not add any account to samba (thinking it should read them from 
the ldap server directly). In the logs I'm not able to find anything useful, 
does anyone have any clue?

The following is an excerpt of my configuration file:

[global]
netbios name  = SEDELDAP
workgroup = LDAP
security = user
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost/
obey pam restrictions = no
ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=myDomain,dc=com
ldap suffix = dc=myDomain, dc=com
ldap group suffix = ou=Groups
ldap user suffix = ou=People
ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers
ldap idmap suffix = ou=Users
ldap passwd sync = Yes
passwd program = /usr/sbin/smbldap-passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n 
*all*authentication*tokens*updated*
add user script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd -m %u
ldap delete dn = Yes
delete user script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-userdel %u
add machine script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd -w %u
add group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupadd -p %g
delete group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupdel %g
add user to group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -m %u %g
delete user from group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -x %u %g
set primary group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-usermod -g %g %u
domain logons = yes


[coge]
browsable = no
available = no
guest ok  = no
valid users = luca
writable = yes
printable = no


Any idea about that?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] device busy, I/O error and unable to umount

2007-10-10 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi all,
this is the situation: two linux servers mounting a samba share from each 
other. Sometimes one of the two share becomes locked, I mean that everything 
I try to do on it results in an Input/Output error. I'm then unable to 
umount the share, since either smbumount or umount report device or resource 
busy. Unluckily I cannot check if this is the case, since the resource is 
not responding and even an lsof does not work. Other commands, like df, block 
on the share.
Any idea about where/how start looking to solve the problem?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] multiple mounts for a smbfs on the same mount point

2007-07-30 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi all,
I'm just wondering why smbmount allows the same mount point to mount several 
times the same share while a normal mount operation (with a non-smbfs) 
returns a busy mount point error.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ mount
...
//server/sys on /mnt/target type smbfs (rw)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ smbmount //server/sys /mnt/target/ -o ip=192.168.4.1,guest
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ mount
...
//server/sys on /mnt/target type smbfs (rw)
//server/sys on /mnt/target type smbfs (rw)

Any explaination? Is there a way to force smbmount to check about the current 
use of the mount point?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] file disappear ???

2007-05-02 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi list,
I'm experiencing a strange behaviour on my samba server. I've got a list of 
users allowed to access a disk share from their windows machines, and the 
clients save files (such as .doc and .xls) in the share. Sometimes certain 
files disappear, that is the client is no more able to see them. I've tried 
changing permissions, ownership, name and position (i.e., moving them to a 
different share) but nothing worked. The only thing I found to solve the 
problem is to zip all the share content and then to unzip it from a windows 
machine, then all the clients see again the disappeared file.
I've tried to check the unzipped file with the original one but the checksum 
is the same and diff does not report any difference. Moreover, from the dos 
command line the file is visible and if you spoecify the file name in the 
explorer path you can open it. So the file is there, can be accessed but 
simply is not shown. The name of the file has no strange characters and 
permissions are ok.
Any idea about what can cause this behaviour and which configuration option to 
work on?

I'm running samba 3 on a suse machine, with reiserfs file system.

Thanks everybody,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] valid users and lost password on windows xp

2006-09-28 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Monday 11 September 2006 15:21 Luca Ferrari's cat, walking on the keyboard, 
wrote:
 Hi all,
 in my network we're using samba as a disk share for users. Each user can
 access users thru his unix login name and password, but sometimes I
 experience that Windows xp (prof.) loses the password, so it prompts the
 user again for the it. In particular, after a smbpasswd password change, I
 have one machine that, even if mounting the share as a network disk (with
 username and password specified and the checkbox to store at reboot is
 checked) each day requires the user to insert the password. In particular
 the computer always proposes a default username composed by
 \\computer_name\windows_username.
 Is there any way to fix this problem? Anyone knows where and how to
 interact with the stored network-password in a windows system?


I found that, mounting directly the shares (without connecting them to a 
network disk) and checking the store password checkbox the system does 
store the password! Thus the problem seems to be that it looses the password 
only if the shares are mounted as network disks. Please note that such 
computer (like others in my network that have no problems) mounts two shares, 
both of them with a valid users pragma.
Any idea?
Thanks,
Luca

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] problem with cups and samba: printing is disabled

2006-09-28 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
I've got a windows printer that is no more working. If I try to see the status 
of the printer I get:

server:~ # lpc status la02
la02:
printer is on device 'smb' speed -1
queuing is enabled
printing is disabled
no entries
daemon present

that means printing is no enabled. If I try to enable the printer I cannot get 
the printer enabled:

server:~ # lpadmin -p la02 -E
server:~ # lpc status la02
la02:
printer is on device 'smb' speed -1
queuing is enabled
printing is disabled
no entries
daemon present


In the printers.conf file there's the message:

Printer la02
Info la02
DeviceURI smb://guest:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/l_a02
State Stopped
StateMessage Call timed out: server did not respond after 1 milliseconds 
closing remote file _stdin_
Accepting Yes
JobSheets none none
QuotaPeriod 0
PageLimit 0
KLimit 0
/Printer


but if I smbclient to the printer I cannot connect!
Any idea?
Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] administrative shares

2006-09-19 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi all,
I cannot find a good description of how to use the windows administrative 
shares. Since I'd like to mount them from a Linux box, using samba, to 
perform backup of the user client, I'd like to know how can I access them. In 
particular, in a computer where I've got a single user, without password, 
what are the share credentials? And how can I set permissions for such share?
Any good document?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] smb.conf

2006-09-18 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Monday 18 September 2006 09:43 Gerald's cat, walking on the keyboard, 
wrote:
 [private]
 writeble = yes
 guest ok = no
 path = /home/samba/private
 valid users = wendy, pierre
 write list = wendy, pierre
 force user = nobody

 All i need yo do now is make the folder private to nobody. How would i
 go on by doing that and would this work.

Maybve you should use another use instead of nobody, a user created ad-hoc for 
this case, or should use group policies.

Luca

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] smbclient mget and compression

2006-09-12 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
I'm using smbclient to replicate a samba share from one Linux machine to 
another one. Unluckily, the amount of data is quite large, thus I'd like to 
transfer it with a compression, but I didn't find such as asny option in 
smbclient. Is it possible?

Thanks,
Luca

P.S.
I cannot use, in this case, other tools like rsync, just only smb!
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] valid users and lost password on windows xp

2006-09-11 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi all,
in my network we're using samba as a disk share for users. Each user can 
access users thru his unix login name and password, but sometimes I 
experience that Windows xp (prof.) loses the password, so it prompts the user 
again for the it. In particular, after a smbpasswd password change, I have 
one machine that, even if mounting the share as a network disk (with username 
and password specified and the checkbox to store at reboot is checked) each 
day requires the user to insert the password. In particular the computer 
always proposes a default username composed by 
\\computer_name\windows_username.
Is there any way to fix this problem? Anyone knows where and how to interact 
with the stored network-password in a windows system?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] deny writing to share root

2005-09-27 Thread Luca Ferrari

Hi,
is it possible to deny writing to the share root, allowing writing to 
the subfolders of such root? In other words, I don't want the root to be 
changed (adding/removing) folders and files, while I want to allow users 
to change the content of the subfolders of the root. How to reach this?


Thanks,
Luca
--
Luca Ferrari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] (no subject)

2005-05-19 Thread Luca Ferrari
Dear list,
a few days ago my samba server hanged up, I mean the samba services where not 
available (I/O error) and I didn't understand why. A simple umount/smbmount 
without restarting samba worked. In the log I found this:

[2005/05/14 07:01:41, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(365)
  read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer

that refers to the fact that sys_read returned -1. What can be the cause? It's 
like the server didn't read enough data from the socket, like a 
connection/cable problem happened. Anyone else with a similar problem?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] slow access while crossmounting samba

2005-05-12 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 17:18 Luca Ferrari's cat walking on the keyboard  
wrote:

 Hi,
 I've got two linux machines with the same distribution and samba 3 that
 cross-mounts a share (i.e., machine a mounts a share of machine b and vice
 versa). I'm experiencing slow access from the machines to the opposite
 mounted share and I don't know what this slow performance can be due to.
 I'm not running with oplocks cause the share is accessed only by the other
 linux machine (no windows clients) and oplocks produced a few problems with
 my database indexes (dataflex) in the past. Thus oplocks and level2oplocks
 are disabled. The following is a part of my configuration file:

 [DATA]
comment   = database
path  = /vol1/sys/
writable  = yes
browsable = no
available = yes
public= yes
printable = no
guest ok  = yes
copy  = lock_template
guest account = smb_guest
read raw  = yes

 where the lock_template is the following:

 [lock_template]
 locking   = no
 posix locking = yes
 oplocks   = no
 level2 oplocks= no


 As you can see I've tried also read raw, but I didn't see any difference.
 Any idea?

 Thanks,
 Luca


I'm still having problems of speed in cross-mounting, and I've tried to place 
the host names in the /etc/hosts file and in the lmhost file, but I cannot 
see valuable changes. Any idea?


-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] slow access while crossmounting samba

2005-05-03 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
I've got two linux machines with the same distribution and samba 3 that 
cross-mounts a share (i.e., machine a mounts a share of machine b and vice 
versa). I'm experiencing slow access from the machines to the opposite 
mounted share and I don't know what this slow performance can be due to. I'm 
not running with oplocks cause the share is accessed only by the other linux 
machine (no windows clients) and oplocks produced a few problems with my 
database indexes (dataflex) in the past. Thus oplocks and level2oplocks are 
disabled. The following is a part of my configuration file:

[DATA]
   comment   = database
   path  = /vol1/sys/
   writable  = yes
   browsable = no
   available = yes
   public= yes
   printable = no
   guest ok  = yes
   copy  = lock_template
   guest account = smb_guest
   read raw  = yes

where the lock_template is the following:

[lock_template]
locking   = no
posix locking = yes
oplocks   = no
level2 oplocks= no


As you can see I've tried also read raw, but I didn't see any difference. Any 
idea?

Thanks,
Luca


-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] multiple mount point

2005-03-03 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
I'm having this annoying problem: it is possible to mount multiple times a smb 
filesystem over the same mount point. Anybody can me explain why? Any other 
filesystem cannot be mounted over a busy mount point.

Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] duplicated name

2005-02-25 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
in my network I had two samba server, one playing with authentication and one 
as guest-like disk share. In the pdc, I defined a few alias thus the machine 
was responding with different names. For an error, I didn't notice that a few 
alias matches a few group names used by the clients. Now, the guest-like 
machine has been dismissed, thus the other one has been assigned to its IP. 
Since that, clients are protesting saying that there's a duplicated name on 
the network, and I found this is a problem due to the fact that the samba 
server is responding with the same netbios name of a group. My question is, 
since the machine is running from a while, why I didn't discovered this 
before? 

Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] asymetrically slow samba

2005-02-22 Thread Luca Ferrari
HI,
this is my situation: a PDC machine that makes available a guest share, 
mounted from another samba server that has a public share too. Both the 
machines mount the other public share (samba 3.0.9), but while moving files 
from one server to the other is fast enough, doing the same movement from the 
other is really slow. Since configurations of the share are similar, I don't 
know what it can be. Anybody has experienced the same problem? I don't know 
what to do or where to look to solve the problem.

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] adding a samba printer with cups on a different network

2005-02-07 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
if I want to add a printer to cups (SMB printer) in the same network of the 
linux machine, I can use lpadmin:
lpadmin -v smb://s93/hps93 ...

but what if I want to add a printer of another network? Where can I specify 
the ip address? I've tried with something like:
lpadmin -v smb://192.168.2.20/hps20
and the printer is added, but it does not work then.

Any help?

Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] mangling problems?

2005-02-03 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
I'm experiencing strange problems due to file names. I'm using samba 3.0.9 on 
a suse 9.1 system, and the problems are the following:
1) I've added the default case = lower and preserve case = no probably after 
some clients had already added a few folders with the same name but different 
cases, like folder and Folder. Now the clients are able to see both the 
folder, but the files in each of them are missing (even if connecting thru 
ssh I can see them). Deleting a folder, the problem disappear, but I'd like 
to know how to fix this for all the folders (except moving files and deleting 
them).
2) folders with names that ends with . or an italian character like è,à,ò, 
make the files within them invisible, and sometimes are changed to strange 
name like V~FTR. Can anybody explain how to fix it?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] smbmount across networks

2005-01-31 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
I'm still having problem with smbmount across two different networks. My 
server has a few shares with the guest access enabled, and in the same 
network of the server, I can mount those shares in guest mode. Nevertheless, 
in another network I cannot mount the share in guest mode (I get a 
ERRNOACCESS), and I have to specify a username/password (even the guest one). 
I cannot understand why, anybody has an idea? I'm using samba 3.0.9.

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] problem accessing from windows xp

2005-01-31 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
I've got a problem with my samba server: all machines (windows xp or not) can 
access a guest ok share without problem, but one cannot, since a 
username/password is required. Of course, it should be a problem of the 
client, but what is the option I'd look for?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] guest smbmount across networks

2005-01-21 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
I've got a Samba 3 PDC, that enables a few shares to be accessed in gusest 
mode. What I'm experiencing is that, while in the same subnetwork, I'm able 
to mount those shares in guest mode (smbmount //pdc/coge /mnt/samba -o 
guest), mounting the share from other subnetworks is possible only giving a 
valid username and password. Furthermore, even mounting the share with an 
user, I cannot access the share for writing, but only for reading. How can I 
fix this?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] PDC and guest access

2005-01-05 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Tuesday 4 January 2005 12:38 Ilia Chipitsine's cat walking on the keyboard  
wrote:

  Hi,
  is it possible to prepare a share with guest access (i.e., without
  username and password) on a server that is playing as PDC (i.e.,
  security=user)? The security setting is global, thus it's like not
  possible, but I'm not sure. Thanks,
  Luca

 map to guest = bad user

 will do the job


The map to guest option is global, while I'm searching for a way to make 
guesting a single share, not the whole samba. Furthermore, can anybody tell 
me why my configuration for host equiv seems not to work? In the config file 
I've the following line:
host equiv = /etc/hosts.equiv
and in the hosts.equiv file I've got:
s88
(being s88 the name of the window machine, also listed in the /etc/hosts 
file). When I try to connect thru the s88 machine, I'm requested to put a 
password, while the machine should access anonymously. Any idea?

Thanks,
Luca

-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] PDC and guest access

2005-01-03 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
is it possible to prepare a share with guest access (i.e., without username 
and password) on a server that is playing as PDC (i.e., security=user)? The 
security setting is global, thus it's like not possible, but I'm not sure.
Thanks,
Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] multiple names

2004-12-16 Thread Luca Ferrari
Is it possible to make a samba (3) server answering with multiple netbios 
names?

Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] pdc and shellinfo

2004-11-15 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
I'm trying to set up my samba server as PDC, but when I login from windows xp 
a notepad windows pops up showing:

[.ShellClassInfo]
[EMAIL PROTECTED],-21787

while it works under consumer windows. Any idea about?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] documents and mail on the pdc

2004-11-15 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
maybe this question is trivial, but I didn't find a solution. I've installed a 
pdc with roaming profiles, and under the windows xp folder on the server I've 
got a documents directory. How can make this folder becoming automagically 
the document folder of each xp computer the user logs in? And it is possible 
to do something similar also for mail? I mean, keeping the mail folders on 
the server, while currently all stuff is stored in Documents and Settings 
under a user.domain folder.

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] samba 3 as PDC

2004-11-12 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
I'm configuring samba as PDC for my network, but I'm having a few problems:
1) roaming profiles are not working, even if I've made up symbolic links in 
the directories, such as (for user luca):
sede:/home/samba-ntprof/luca # ls -l
totale 1
drwx--   3 luca users 120 2004-11-12 17:06 .
drwxrwxrwx   3 root root   72 2004-11-12 11:58 ..
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root6 2004-11-12 17:06 fluca - WinXP/
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root6 2004-11-12 17:06 s64 - WinXP/
drwx--  13 luca users 504 2004-11-12 17:09 WinXP

even if the profile management tool of windows xp says that the profiles are 
roaming. With not working I mean that I cannot see the exact desktop, even 
if the content is the same, and icons are rearranged. 
2) the logon script seems to work only on consumer windows. I've got a simple 
logon:
#cat logon.bat
net use H: /home

Now, while it works under consumer windows, it does not work under windows xp 
professional.
3) I cannot see network resource icon in XP prof, and it is like I cannot 
connect to the samba server, even if I use the ip address.

The following is my configuration file:

# Global section, general settings.
[global]
netbios name  = PDC
workgroup = GammaDue
domain master = yes
local master  = yes
preferred master  = yes
os level  = 65
security  = user
domain logons = yes
encrypt passwords = yes
   logon path= \\%L\profiles\%u\%m
logon script  = logon.bat
logon drive   = H:
# for consumer windows only
logon home= \\%L\%u\.win_profile\%m
add user script   = /usr/bin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 500 -s /bin/false 
-M %u
interfaces   = eth0 127.0.0.1
bind interfaces only = true
printing = cups
printcap name= cups
printer admin= @ntadmin, root, administrator

[netlogon]
path   = /var/samba/lib/netlogon
writable   = no
browsable  = no
[profiles]
path   = /home/samba-ntprof
browsable  = no
writable   = yes
create mask= 0600
directory mask = 0700
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
browseable = No
read only = No
map archive = yes


[prova]
browseable = yes
read only = yes
path = /tmp



Any idea?
Thanks,
Luca

-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] different announces between w2k and xp

2004-11-11 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
as I wrote in a previous e-mail, we are noting different announcing between a 
w2k computer and an xp one (both professional). The computers are not trying 
to log on a windows domain, and this time I can provide also a dump of 
traffic thru ethereal. As you can see from the attached files, the win2k 
computer sends also the username (marty) along the network, and we cannot 
understand why. Is just a problem of a different implementation of the SMB 
stacks among different operating systems, or there's a specific reason for 
this behavior?

Thanks,
Luca  Luca
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] win2000 e win xp announce

2004-11-08 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
we are noting a strange behavior sniffing the traffic on a windows network, 
while studying samba. Using win2000, when the computer starts, it sends 
across the network not only the computer name (we are using a workgroup, no 
domain) but also the username once the login is done. Instead, the wixp 
machine sends only the machine name. We are not trying to log in a domain, 
and there are no network volumes mounted or accessed with a user type 
security. Is there simply a difference between the two implementations, or 
there's something that we don't know?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] invisible server

2004-09-24 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Thursday 23 September 2004 18:18 your cat walking on the keyboard wrote:

 May be due to no guest account.  From Samba 3 by Example:

 Network browsing involves SMB broadcast announcements, SMB enumeration
 requests, connections to the IPC$ share, share enumerations, and SMB
 connection setup processes. The use of anonymous connections to a Samba
 server involve the use of the /guest account/ that must map to a valid
 UNIX UID.

I've added a guest user with smpasswd -a guest, and then I have inserted a 
line in the global section of smb.conf:
guest account = guest
but it is still not working:

mammuth:~ # nmblookup mammuth
querying mammuth on 192.168.1.255
name_query failed to find name mammuth

Another thing that maybe can help:

mammuth:~ # nmblookup -A 192.168.1.9
Looking up status of 192.168.1.9
MAMMUTH   00 - B ACTIVE
MAMMUTH   03 - B ACTIVE
MAMMUTH   20 - B ACTIVE
..__MSBROWSE__. 01 - GROUP B ACTIVE
G2  00 - GROUP B ACTIVE
G2  1b - B ACTIVE
G2  1d - B ACTIVE
G2  1e - GROUP B ACTIVE

that seems it's working, isn't it?
What am I doing wrong?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] invisible server

2004-09-24 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Friday 24 September 2004 09:44 Luca Ferrari's cat walking on the keyboard  
wrote:

 On Thursday 23 September 2004 18:18 your cat walking on the keyboard wrote:
  May be due to no guest account.  From Samba 3 by Example:
 
  Network browsing involves SMB broadcast announcements, SMB enumeration
  requests, connections to the IPC$ share, share enumerations, and SMB
  connection setup processes. The use of anonymous connections to a Samba
  server involve the use of the /guest account/ that must map to a valid
  UNIX UID.

 I've added a guest user with smpasswd -a guest, and then I have inserted a
 line in the global section of smb.conf:
 guest account = guest
 but it is still not working:

 mammuth:~ # nmblookup mammuth
 querying mammuth on 192.168.1.255
 name_query failed to find name mammuth

 Another thing that maybe can help:

 mammuth:~ # nmblookup -A 192.168.1.9
 Looking up status of 192.168.1.9
 MAMMUTH   00 - B ACTIVE
 MAMMUTH   03 - B ACTIVE
 MAMMUTH   20 - B ACTIVE
 ..__MSBROWSE__. 01 - GROUP B ACTIVE
 G2  00 - GROUP B ACTIVE
 G2  1b - B ACTIVE
 G2  1d - B ACTIVE
 G2  1e - GROUP B ACTIVE

 that seems it's working, isn't it?
 What am I doing wrong?


I'm still working on this problem. It must be said that, after the addition of 
the guest user, I can try to access a share from a windows 98 client, but it 
asks me for only a password (not the username/password), thus I don't now how 
to access the share (every password I insert, even if one of the valid users 
for that share, does not work). However, I'm still unable to find the 
computer thru the find computer of windows, and even nmblookup does not 
work.

Any idea?

Luca

-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] invisible server

2004-09-23 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
I've got a few samba server in my network, but one of them is invisible. I 
cannot do a nmblookup on it (even from the server itself), but I cannot 
telnet the port 137, thus it should not be a problem of firewall. From 
windows xp machines, I can connect specifying the IP address, while from 
win98 machines I cannot (I got an error like network name does not exist).
The following is the smb.conf file, I'm running samba 2.2.7:

global]
os level = 33
time server = Yes
unix extensions = Yes
encrypt passwords = Yes
log level = 5
syslog = 5
printing = CUPS
printcap name = CUPS
socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY
wins support = No
veto files = /*.eml/*.nws/riched20.dll/*.{*}/
security = user
workgroup = G2OR
server string = Mammuth
netbios name = mammuth
[project]
comment = Cartella PROJECT/ufficio MK via SMB - Mammuth
path = /mnt/data/uff_mk/PROJECT
browsable = yes
writable = yes
printable = no
valid users = +ufficioMK +cam


I've tried with the remote announce and master browser options, but it still 
not works. Any idea?

Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] windows program over a samba share

2004-09-21 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
I don't know if this is possible, but I'd like to install a window program (in 
the specific JBuilder Personal) over a samba share, and then to mount a 
network share as a disk from windows clients, so they can use the program. Is 
it possible? Any idea on how to share windows programs from a linux server?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] folder refresh in mac os x

2004-08-05 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
I'm using both samba 2.2 and 3.0 and I've experienced this problem with a few 
mac os x (until 10.3): sometimes it happens that whole groups are not present 
in the network list, thus the user is forced to insert the ip address to 
connect to a specific samba server. At the same time, over macs continue 
seeing the server list. After a mac reboot, the list is complete again, while 
after a while it is not.
Any idea?

Thanks,
Luca
-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Failed to initialise SAM_ACCOUNT for user

2004-07-30 Thread Luca Ferrari
Hi,
trying to add users to my samba machine I got the following error:

magroup1:~ # smbpasswd -a samba
New SMB password:
Retype new SMB password:
Failed to initialise SAM_ACCOUNT for user samba.
Failed to modify password entry for user samba

What does it mean? I didn't find documentation about.
Thanks,
Luca

-- 
Luca Ferrari,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba