- Forwarded message from Bob Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Bob Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Daemon Errors
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:58:07 -0700
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=3.2
Just as background information: our spam filter caught 14000 attempted
spams in the last two weeks. Suggestions on blocking more are welcome
but the vast majority is already blocked. I think we removed the
@samba.org whitelist.
--
Martin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
To
Date: Tue Dec 16 05:59:37 2003
Author: mbp
Update of /data/cvs/sambaweb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv28600
Modified Files:
download.html
Log Message:
NetBIOS Auditing Tool seems to have moved. Reported by Alfonso Gazo Cervero.
Revisions:
download.html 1.21 =
Date: Tue Dec 16 06:12:48 2003
Author: mbp
Update of /data/cvs/sambaweb/GUI
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31689
Modified Files:
index.html
Log Message:
Add Smb4K
Revisions:
index.html 1.28 = 1.29
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 21:07:56 +, Daniel Kasak wrote:
We have a mail filter ( CanIt, by Roaring Penguin, see
http://www.roaringpenguin.com ) that is doing a very good job indeed of
blocking spam and viruses.
And I certainly get a lot from this list ... so much that without the
use of
Date: Fri Nov 14 03:24:19 2003
Author: mbp
Update of /data/cvs/sambaweb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv28915
Modified Files:
ml-etiquette.html
Log Message:
Say that you may receive worms if you post to the list.
Revisions:
ml-etiquette.html 1.4 = 1.5
Date: Fri Nov 14 03:25:38 2003
Author: mbp
Update of /data/cvs/sambaweb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29087
Modified Files:
ml-etiquette.html
Log Message:
Refine point about worms.
Revisions:
ml-etiquette.html 1.5 = 1.6
Date: Fri Nov 14 03:28:03 2003
Author: mbp
Update of /data/cvs/sambaweb
In directory dp.samba.org:/home/httpd/html/samba
Added Files:
donations_list.html
Log Message:
Add file that for some reason was on the site but not in CVS
Revisions:
donations_list.html NONE = 1.1
Date: Fri Nov 14 03:46:29 2003
Author: mbp
Update of /data/cvs/sambaweb
In directory dp.samba.org:/home/httpd/html/samba
Removed Files:
donations_list.html
Log Message:
Oops, remove autogenerated file
Revisions:
donations_list.html 1.1 = NONE
Date: Wed Nov 12 06:23:01 2003
Author: mbp
Update of /data/cvs/sambaweb/support
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv16445
Modified Files:
singapore.html
Log Message:
Add Artocol Systems
Revisions:
singapore.html 1.1 = 1.2
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 07:56:18 -0500, tvsjr wrote:
Helpful suggestions (although its too late for those of us already
subscribed): Quit forwarding the list onto Usenet, at least with email
addresses exposed (what's the real use of this, considering it's not that
big of a deal for people to
On 15 Oct 2003, David Brodbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've also seen bursts of virus traffic for no apparent reason. It could be
a coincidence. Correlation != causation.
There's also always the question of what your ISP is doing. My
ameritech.net account gets vast quantities of spam,
On 14 Oct 2003, J. Frisbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I singed up for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] using a one-time
email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and now I get virus
laden spam messages at that address about every ninety seconds
-- thanks.
This kind of complaint is explicitly off topic
On 14 Oct 2003, J. Frisbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would you like us to do differently?
I see your original message was a bit misleading: you said that you
singed up for the samba, but in fact you also posted to the list,
thus disclosing your address.
First of all: we don't disclose the
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:13:01 -0500, Jared Rypka-Hauer wrote:
Just to further confirm the idea that this mailing list is associated with
the current surge in receipts of the SWEN virus, I signed up for this list
when I upgraded to Samba 2.2.3 on Oct 1. An hour later I began receiving
mass
On 8 Oct 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Is Someone can tell me if Samba is available under Linux 64bits ?
If Yes, has Samba adherence(s) to Hardware platform on which Linux is
running ? MoreOver, which distribution(s) ?
You should ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, I do believe
- Forwarded message from Adrian Stabiszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Adrian Stabiszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to calculate a domain sid?
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:01:01 +0200
Hi!
I am working on a possibility to prepare an LDAP directory without having
- Forwarded message from Pedigo Michael-G17060 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Pedigo Michael-G17060 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Core Dump issue with Solaris8 and 2.2.8a
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:40:16 -0500
Hello,
I am NOT an advanced UNIX admin and
- Forwarded message from Botelho [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Botelho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help.
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 15:48:43 -
X-Mailer: UebiMiau 2.7.2
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-19.1 required=4.0
tests=MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_2,
On 11 Aug 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless I am going mad I cannot seem to find any documentation on
smbwrapper at the Samba web site.
[Paul, this kind of question is better sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
not the admin address.]
There is an smbwrapper/README [attached] file in the
- Forwarded message from Marco Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Marco Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: s/390
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:34:44 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=4.0
On 22 Jul 2003, Gustavo Barbosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can you tell me if the winbind and samba realy works well?
Yes, they do work well.
--
Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
- Forwarded message from =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3 Siwek?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3 Siwek?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Few questions...
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 9:45:25 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: onet.poczta
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-19.1 required=4.0
On 29 Jul 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just looked back over your site, and can't find where I got the link from.
I'll look further and let you know. I have looked at the section you point
me to, but still have no idea what I'm looking at. As I said, I'm new to
Unix and don't yet
- Forwarded message from Ruediger Honzatko [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Ruediger Honzatko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: frage an die sambagurus
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 16:03:12 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Schenker CO AG
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2)
I just noticed this in the libc manual.
http://www.gnu.org/manual/glibc-2.2.5/html_node/Backtraces.html
It could be pretty cool to have this built in to smb_panic().
--
Martin
On 20 Mar 2003, Richard Sharpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Martin Pool wrote:
I just noticed this in the libc manual.
http://www.gnu.org/manual/glibc-2.2.5/html_node/Backtraces.html
It could be pretty cool to have this built in to smb_panic
On 17 Mar 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
checking whether to use included popt... ./popt
checking configure summary... configure: error: summary failure.
Aborting config
Have a look in config.log. If you can't work out what's wrong from
that, post the *relevant*
For developer mode, this seems to be the same as safe_strcpy: we
clobber the specified region at runtime. Otherwise, it skips the
static CHECK_STRING_SIZE call.
I think this is meant to allow you to call it passing the address of
an array whose size is less than the maxlength passed to
On 15 Mar 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch also includes a 'marker' of the last caller to clobber_region (ie,
the function that called pstrcpy() that called clobber_region) to assist in
debugging problems that may have smashed the stack. This is printed at
smb_panic() time.
On 18 Mar 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all, do a char-by-char walk through both buffers until we get
to a non-ascii character, or a difference between the strings. This
prefix can be directly compared without needing to call into iconv.
This should be much faster for strings that
Does anyone know about this?
- Forwarded message from Larry Urquhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Larry Urquhart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: amigasamba
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 21:28:49 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.0.2)
On 13 Mar 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 - Use IO not mmap when running under valgrind. Not so nice.
thats why we have the 'use mmap = no' smb.conf option. It seems to
work quite well and is fast enough for testing.
OK, thanks.
--
Martin
Please let's have this conversation on the list.
I have Martin's notes.txt (Notes on Samba Testing Framework for
Unittests). I think I misunderstood, and assumed there was a working (if
immature) basic framework that hadn't been checked in yet.
OK, we're at the planning stage? Some
On 10 Mar 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps you could post your specific thoughts on
what an automated editor
I understand that by using a GUI rather than command
line will in some cases make things easier. My
experiance with Samba is that I had to research,
implement and test many
On 10 Mar 2003, David Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this did it, joining the Linux Server to the domain and changing the
smb.conf to use a password server fixed the problem.
Great.
now the next thing is to get the permissions to create files in the shared
directory (Access is denied when
I've been testing injection of many jobs (thousands) into a print
queue, and am noticing that appliance_head samba seems to spend heaps
of time in print_queue_update, trying to reconcile the output of lpq
with samba's database.
In particular, this is causing smbspool to give warnings because
tdb (all branches) has the behaviour that when opening an existing
database, if you don't specify the right hash size, the open will fail
with EIO.
This means for example that tdbtool can't open printing tdbs after
jra's change to increase their has size to 5000.
Wouldn't it be reasonable to
On 11 Mar 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doh ! Yeah, that's a really good idea. Wish I'd thought of it :-).
Good, I'll send you a patch then.
It would make the stress tests of a certain person in Roseville
much harder to destroy Samba :-).
I imagine her work as being similar to somebody
If you use tdbs under valgrind, and in particular if you run
tdbtorture, you may get spurious uninitialized value warnings. I
think this is because valgrind doesn't understand that the mmap'd area
may be written to by other processes. Memory can, from the point of
view of the grinded process,
Some files have a little valgrind_strlen function in there, I suppose
to work around a Valgrind bug. Does anyone know what the bug was?
There might be a cleaner solution.
--
Martin
On 11 Mar 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I now have a *homepage* ! Woo ! (Cribbed shamelessly from tridge
:-).
If I were you, I'd make it more clear that I can't work out how to
install Samba is not urgent enough to call you.
What software did you use to make the funny face? :-)
--
Martin
On 8 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 21:20, Tim Potter wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 09:10:23PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Is there any reason I should not apply this patch to Samba HEAD?
I think the patch was eaten by Mailman. Please
On 9 Mar 2003, Scott Prive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Tim. So far, most of the tests I've seen in CVS are unit- or
small-tests, but as a software tester I'm more interested in integration
tests... which it sounds like you and Martin are working on.
Our framework is intended to
I was thinking about Andrew's fstring-overflow patch from a few weeks
ago: for developer builds, it touches the last byte of a string buffer
to check that it's as long as it should be.
This should be reasonably helpful in catching string overflows on the
heap, but not so good on the stack,
Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
gcc is a great compiler, but as of gcc3.2.2, it can't
compile Samba on Sparc with -O2. This has been marked
as a high priority bug in the gcc bug tracking system,
and should be fixed before the next release.
To make such regressions less likely in the
- Forwarded message from Scattergood, Ivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
I am hoping to run a Unix process from code running on a windows client, I
am told this can be done using Samba, does any one have any example code to
do this?
Regards
Ivan Scattergood
London Software Development
-
- Forwarded message from Johan Husselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Johan Husselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please help with smb printing
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 19:17:40 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.
Can tou please help me to setup
On 21 Feb 2003, Marco Eyzaguirre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a win2000 domain controller in subnet 172.17.0.x and a linux
server in 172.17.20.x (DHCP assign) The DC not solve the ip /
netbiosname relation (A record i think..) like a win98 / NT /2000
If i ping the linux server from
On 19 Feb 2003, HAKIZIMANA Claude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you help me?
You need to ask this kind of question on the users list,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Martin
util_unistr.c/init_valid_table in HEAD and 3.0 causes a 64k leak every
time the configuration is loaded if there is no valid.dat file
installed. (The pointer to the malloc'd valid_table is clobbered by
the call to map_file.)
It looks like it is intended that the valid table be recreated on each
DON'T SEND USER QUESTIONS TO SAMBA-TECHNICAL.
Just curios under what circumstances the smbd runs as user id process ( unix
id )
Broadly: it runs as a user when doing operations on behalf of that
user, and as root when doing system tasks.
and running as root is a security risk?
No. If you
- Forwarded message from S Poteet [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from hotmail.com (dav61.sea2.hotmail.com [207.68.164.196])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E67D2C05E
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 18
- Forwarded message from ???H?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
DEAR ALL:
I NEED YOUR HELP. I MANAGE AN AIX/R6 VER4.3.
I WANT TO STORE DATA TO AN IBM PC SERVER.
PLEASE TELL ME HOW TO INSTALL AND GET SAMBA FOR AIX VER 4.3.
AND HOW TO
On 20 Feb 2003, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and the backtrace:
#0 0x40325079 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x4039d944 in __DTOR_END__ () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x402c80e6 in system () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3 0x08183e8c in smb_panic (why=0x8221974 internal
What is the commit policy for 3.0? Should all changes be moved from
HEAD except ones that are explicitly too risky? Or only bug fixes?
What about documentation?
--
Martin
After talking to Tim, I wanted to start committing to HEAD some test
harnesses that will exercise internal bits of Samba, such as
StrCaseCmp to start with.
These will be small C files that link to -lbigballofmud and allow
particular functions to be exercised from the command line, with a
view
On 18 Feb 2003, Matt Schillinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry to post High availability oriented questions to this list, but
I was wondering about some samba configuration parameters and what
options are available.
You're welcome, this is on-topic here.
What I am interested in, is
On 19 Feb 2003, raj rajesh kalagarla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI,
I am a new user to this group. Presently I am doing networking
linux machines in my windows network environment. I am able to
access linux server from windows machines but I am not able to
access linux server from linux
On 18 Feb 2003, Boyce, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry - I'm probably doing something dumb, but I still get failures even
with this patch - first, if I save the patch as it appeared in my Outlook
window, then line 25 consists of a single left brace char, which results in
:
You can
--
Martin
doh doh doh
- Forwarded message from Richard Sharpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Richard Sharpe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CVS update: samba/source/lib
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:57:57 +1100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 [EMAIL
On 17 Feb 2003, Boyce, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK - I've been trying to apply the patch that Tim posted (to supersede
Martin's first cut) to the Samba 2.2.7a source file for util_sock.c, but get
errors applying the patch no matter what I do.
Thanks for trying that.
I guess the posted
On 17 Feb 2003, Boyce, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's what I get if I apply the posted patch :
As I said I'll send you an update just for 2.2. But in general, in
case you're interested, here are some tips on applying mismatched
patches:
MYBOX:/usr/local/src/samba-2.2.7a/source/lib#
StrCaseCmp (and strequal) in HEAD has the interesting side-effect that it only
compares the first PSTRING_LEN (1024) bytes of the strings.
I suppose comparing strings longer than that is probably a bit
unlikely, but it still seems kind of dangerous.
Would it be OK to change it to use dynamic
On 18 Feb 2003, Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Possibly only for long strings? But then that is probably
micro-optimization.
If we really cared about optimizing this function, then we would
compare character-by-character rather than converting both strings to
uppercase first.
On 17 Feb 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know how to detect a truu64 system in configure.in ?
I'm going through my patchlist and there is a big optimisation that
can be done on systems where the getgrnam() call works (True64 is
listed as the only broken system) and I'd like to add
Is there any kind of consensus (he says, hopefully) that Doxygen is a
good idea? If I'm looking at code is it OK to cleanup comments into
standard form?
--
Martin
On 18 Feb 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What exactly do you want to do here ? I'm not clear what
you mean?
The thing I noticed is that StrCaseCmp (and indeed many charcnv
function) truncate strings to 1024 characters.
I got here following a Valgrind assertion which may or may not be
On 18 Feb 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please merge all these changes to 3.0 as well.
OK.
--
Martin
On 15 Mar 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
O email [EMAIL PROTECTED] foi alterado para
[EMAIL PROTECTED], entretanto a sua mensagem foi
redirecionada para o novo email. Atenciosamente, American BankNote
Ltda
This person has been unsubscribed.
Please engage brain before starting
In several cases, the return code from string_to_sid is not checked.
So if the user enters a syntactically invalid SID, the program will
proceed to use uninitialized data.
This patch checks for a few such cases that I found. Can somebody
please review it?
Index: groupdb/mapping.c
On 13 Feb 2003, Neal Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, i dont , feel that the newbies comment was in the spirit of the
open source, This list is here to help people, and if sombody is
asking a question, its part of the opensource comunity's responsibilty
to try to help
I don't know
On 13 Feb 2003, Pierrick Brossin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can also do what I do. Nicely answer the question and then
point out a few pieces of material that could assist that newb in
expanding their knowledge to a level closer to those of us who were once
newbs ourselves. You may make
On 13 Feb 2003, Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Martin Pool wrote:
rpcclient.c/process_cmd has
if (cmd[strlen(cmd) - 1] == '\n')
cmd[strlen(cmd) - 1] = '\0';
if (!next_token(p, buf, , sizeof(buf
On 14 Feb 2003, Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a) If we want the password-quality script to handle this,
I think we'll all agree, storing clear text password is really
not a good idea. Perhaps the interface should provide the new
encrypted passwords to the external
On 14 Feb 2003, Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we even need to save the decrypted password?
A colleague once saved old encrypted passwords
to allow the do they really know the old one
test to be done via challange-response.
Different scripts might want to
On 12 Feb 2003, Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because we don't have the old password, doing this via PAM doesn't
work. The pam_cracklib module doesn't apply the test if it's run as
root, and won't run without the old password as a normal user.
I know it won't work with the
I've set up a cron script to autogenerate Doxygen from HEAD, 2_2 and
APPLIANCE_HEAD on samba.org:
http://samba.org/doxygen/
This rebuilds every day from the anoncvs checkout.
Thanks to Andrew for reminding me to do this.
--
Martin
On 12 Feb 2003, Michael Steffens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's 60 by default after installation, but is tunable (with reboot).
Maybe hp should sell per-fd licences :-/
The solution (and this should also work on other platforms) was to
have winbindd housekeep its client connections by
rpcclient.c/process_cmd has
if (cmd[strlen(cmd) - 1] == '\n')
cmd[strlen(cmd) - 1] = '\0';
if (!next_token(p, buf, , sizeof(buf))) {
return NT_STATUS_OK;
}
/* strip the trainly \n if it exsists */
len =
On 12 Feb 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ cvs log -r1.9.2.14 tdb/tdbutil.c
revision 1.9.2.14
date: 2002/11/27 01:51:43; author: jra; state: Exp; lines: +21 -25
SMBencrypt needs dos codepage also. Change tdb_pack/unpack to take a
function pointer applied to all strings if it
On 12 Feb 2003, Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Samba HEAD
Looks like it's triggered by not closing quotes:
[root@workst1 root]# rpcclient -U admin%passwd -W GROUP workst1 -d2
added interface ip=192.168.168.250 bcast=192.168.168.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
rpcclient $ adddriver Windows
On 12 Feb 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Update of /data/cvs/sambaweb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30335
Modified Files:
archives.html
Added Files:
ml-etiquette.html
Log Message:
adding note about ml etiquette
That looks good.
I added a link to this to the
On 11 Feb 2003, Pierre Belanger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is it? I have my own comments at the end ...
From the documentation I wrote (even if I'm French I think it's not
that bad!?!?!?):
This looks good to me.
Would it be possible to do this as a PAM module called by Samba?
(Possibly
The Samba 3.0 roadmap mentions this as a wishlist item for 3.x. I'm
interested in looking at it.
Has anybody else already worked on it?
It seemed like it would involve a separate smbd process repeatedly
parsing the output of lpq and feeding it into a database, rather than
this being done
On 11 Feb 2003, Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seemed like it would involve a separate smbd process repeatedly
parsing the output of lpq and feeding it into a database, rather than
this being done on-demand from a regular smbd child. I suppose when
some change is
On 12 Feb 2003, Tim Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My idea which I've probably told a couple of you is to use kernel
dnotify stuff to work out when jobs are spooled or removed. So a
daemon would get a signal when a spool file is created and add that to
printing.tdb. When the file completes
On 7 Feb 2003, Boyce, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks - that was it. I now have a script /usr/local/bin/winbind, which
does
umask 000
/etc/init.d/winbind $1
umask 027
and everything is working ok now - I can stop restart winbind to my
heart's content without any problem
Following on from the bug in winbindd this morning I did a quick grep
for umask.
In HEAD/client/client.c main(), there is a pair of calls to umask. It
looks to me like they're trying to retrieve the current umask without
changing it. However, the retrieved value is never used. (Did I miss
In addition, wrepld sets its umask to 0. Is that really necessary?
--
Martin
On 28 Jan 2003, Christian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just upgraded to Solaris 8, and downloaded the the following binary
package from www.samba.org http://www.samba.org :
samba-2.2.7-sol8-suncc-64bit.pkg.gz
When trying to gunzip it, here is my output:
/home/ccampbell #
On 16 Jan 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:07:34AM -0500, Michael Bennett wrote:
[setregid() fails]
So... comments? Does the patch Do The Right Thing? Think this patch or
something similar could get merged sometime? :)
A patch like that would get accepted
On 28 Jan 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue Jan 28 07:58:16 2003
Author: idra
Update of /data/cvs/sambaweb/support
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18414
Modified Files:
italy.html
Log Message:
new company ATLINK SRL
Thanks!
--
Martin
Because of the enormous amount of traffic being generated by Windows
viruses[0] I have turned on Mailman attachment filtering on the
high-traffic samba.org lists.
Lists will now pass only text/plain MIME parts through to the list.
multipart/alternative messages with both text and html forms will
Because of the enormous amount of traffic being generated by Windows
viruses[0] I have turned on Mailman attachment filtering on the
high-traffic samba.org lists.
Lists will now pass only text/plain MIME parts through to the list.
multipart/alternative messages with both text and html forms will
Sascha, please send your message to the mailing list in future, not to
the list administrator.
Where do people get the idea that this is the right address??
- Forwarded message from Radio Gong 2000 GmbH Co. KG [Technik]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Radio Gong 2000 GmbH Co. KG [Technik]
hp CR1501 and friends
This patch tries to make winbindd cope with the security option
'restrict anonymous=1' on NT4 and W2kS. When this option is set, the
DC disallows SAMR calls on unauthenticated connections, but does allow
LSA translations between names and sids.
Obviously winbindd can't
On 19 Jan 2003, Christian Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I don't have the time to pursue this further at the moment, just
wanted to note it:
The arguments syntax of smbmount 2.2.3a (smbfs of Debian stable)
requires that one gives -o before further options like username=...
.
hp CR 1548
This patch fixes a problem I observed where there were error messages
relating to getpwent /usr/bin/passwd, which is obviously a pretty
unlikely username. Investigation showed that the problem comes from
the 1.247.2.52 patch to loadparm.c (appliance_head only), which
replaces some
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
