On 10-10-01 05:56 AM, Mauro Destro - Impel Systems Srl wrote:
I'm trying to setup a simple standalone Samba server in a win2k
network without domain.
I've followed some basic howto on the net, users can see shares and
can save, modify and delete files and folders.
My big problem is the secu
Alex de Vaal wrote:
Hello,
Is there a parameter in smb.conf that prevent users to use drag and drop
within Samba shares?
I know this is a Winedow$ function, but some users (hum, hum) use Explorer
to open their files and
accidentally they drag and drop sometimes a directory in the root of th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found a post about this somewhere (I can't seem to find it again), which said
this was a problem
with the VFAT code, not samba.
I was wondering, is this is the case? is the is a work-around? Basically, is there a way to write
large files via samba to a VFAT USB d
Asier Baranguán wrote:
Jerome Haltom escribió:
XFS eats files. Did you lose power or did your system crash? XFS is very
good at losing files.
Hmmm... I have two samba PDC running in a very faulty electrical
connection, with power failures each week and XFS never hit/lose a file.
This is
Tomáš Hnyk wrote:
I use the same smb.conf file on both machines:
To start, you'll need to give each machine it's own netbios name.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Rocky Zhou wrote:
local file system, it is OK , but when I mount the smbfs:
I'm assuming your doing this on Linux
smbfs is deprecated and has a 2GB filesize limit. Use cifs instead.
mount -t cifs //host/share /mnt/network -o username=
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the fol
Daniel Sung wrote:
Hi,
I have some query about the samba security, we are trying to setup
remote map drive for vpn client, since this kind of client connection
which using different IP address, the only way we can do is to set
'hosts allow' to nothing.
If your VPN setup is anything li
stephen mulcahy wrote:
Hi Markus,
Markus Franke wrote:
well it's actually very close to what I want. The problem is that the
existing user passwords should be preserved. I don't want to create new
passwords for each user. Is it somehow possible to convert the encoded
password string in /etc/pa
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
They were modifying the file on the unix side "behind Samba's back" so of
course the caching was a problem. I'm not sure why it didn't show up in XP
systems though.
Since your hosting this on BSD, which, to the best of my knowledge,
doesn't support kernel oplocks,
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I don't believe the person is modifying the file behind Samba's back. They're
using Windows to edit the file so it should work fine.
Then you'll have to explain this in more detail:
> however we find that if the file is modified on the Unix side the
Win98 box does
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Hi,
We have an old Win98 box at work that is used for programming GALs and
EEPROMs, however we find that if the file is modified on the Unix side the
Win98 box doesn't notice. This is rather annoying when you are iterating a
design as you can imagine!
One work around i
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 09:31 -0500, Alan Cheers wrote:
> Hi-
>
> I'm running Samba on OpenSuse10.2 and have shared some drives with
> Windows clients. The clients are accessing a bunch of MS Word files on
> the server and we have experienced a lot of weird file locking
> problems.
>
> Sometimes M
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 01:15:31PM -0500, Michael Lueck wrote:
> All technologies involved I have well tested, just that I have not
> assembled them together in this combination before WITH THE EXCEPTION OF
> SMBFS.
>
> Debian Sarge OS
> Kernel 2.6.12-1-k7
> Samba from samba.org 3.0.23d
>
> Bac
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:12:46PM -0400, Aaron Kincer wrote:
> The EULA for XP Home explicitly states a maximum of five (5) users to
> connect for file/print sharing services. XP Professional is ten (10).
> This is software independent. Installing a Windows version of Samba (if
> one exists now
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 03:29:20PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've got a strange problem on the samba servers here at my
> workingplace. The problem is that we have some files on these machines
> which seem to be corrupt. Mostly the corrupt files are images, excel
> che
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 12:32:08PM -0600, Anthony Messina wrote:
> Steve Freeman wrote:
> >Thank you Anthony. The following is the output
> >
> >---
> >
> >Chain FORWARD (policy DROP)
> >num target prot opt source destination
> >1QUEUE all
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 12:28:01AM +, Steve Freeman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Cured the kernel problem, I now get a very good service from samba.
>
> However, in my /var/log/samba directory, there are a lot of public IP
> attempts to gain access. All are denied, however, why are they getting past
>
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 02:47:11PM +0100, Henrik Zagerholm wrote:
> Hi list,
> I've read the GPL and have som questions regarding incorporating GPL
> tools in other software.
> Lets say that I make an Webbapplication that on some occasions uses a
> GPL tool i.e nmblookup or rpcclient how much o
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 12:52:30PM -0600, Larry Alkoff wrote:
> I am trying to mount a share on a linyx server using a mimimal smb.conf
> as suggested in the Samba HOWTO.
>
> I do a lot samba to Windows machine but this is the first time I have
> tried to access a linux share from linux.
>
> Nm
You did not see my first reply on the list because I did not
"reply to all", my intent being to keep off topic noise *off* the
list.
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 09:22:12PM +0300, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> >Because this list is properly configured to not mangle headers.
> >Reply-To: is meant to be se
Since IBM and friends are doing a fine job of reducing SCOX to a pile
of rubble, it hardly seems worth the karma to stress over whether or
not SCOX is distributing other projects. Besides, making public
statements about the GPL (or your lease agreement, for that matter)
don't constitute violation
Sounds to me as though Windows is simply caching a successful
password, and gives it a try. Not a Samba security hole at all.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:44:21AM +0300, wimax wrote: > Hi, security.
> > I am install Debian woody and Samba 2.2.3a-13, > but this bugs Is
present in Samba 3.0. > > I
The shared folder in Linux needs to be writable by the same user you
are loggin in as under Samba. In a pinch, as the super user, try:
chmod uog+rwx /shared
or:
chmod 777 /shared
To grant all permissions to all users for that folder. You may want
to pursue resources on Unix file system permis
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 09:26:23AM -0400, Adam Tauno WIlliams wrote:
> > I need quotas and would like acls, but most of all want a fast reliable
> > system.
>
> Sounds like XFS.
>
> > Reports indicate that ext2/3 is particularly slow, especially for long file
> > listings and many people
>
> Y
Unix systems have a default permission.. On most system, the default is
User: Read-Write
Group: Read
Other: Read
Create mode is used to remove permissions. That is, any permission
that is not in create mode gets removed.
The default create mode is:
User: Read-Write
Group: None
Other: Note
The
This isn't a 'keep it simple' answer I'm afraid, but it sounds to me
as though your system is trying to look up the IP address of your
internal machines by DNS on an Internet only DNS server. I think
there are configuration option in Samba now that prevent this, but I'm
not sure what they are.
On
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 10:18:22AM -0600, Brian Merrell wrote:
> >
> > I tried timing the time it takes to save. It takes the older machine
> about
> > 1.25 seconds
> > to save a 606KB drawing and it takes ~3 seconds for the new "fancy"
> machine.
> >
> > Could this be due to ReiserFS?
> >
In my
Hi.
Does your new system use ReiserFS?
When these ~20 second delays happen, can you see if there's a spike of
System CPU time useage on the server?
I've not heard of it happening over a network share, but some "poorly
behaved" applications can trigger a 'feature', (actually, a
performance optimi
>From personal experience, I may suggest, however if you have over
10,000 files in a single directory, that you make certain your
Filesystem can handle the number of files efficiently. In Linux, for
example, I think ReiserFS is the best candidate for this kind of
application.
On Thu, May 27, 2004
I would start with smbstatus to see what workstation/user has the file
open.
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 04:12:19PM +0200, Andreas Haumer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi!
>
> Chris Garrigues wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running 3.0.4 and have had several reports from us
You might want to consider enabling and configurins WINS for your
network, rather than rely on the serendipity of broadcast browsing.
On a more practical note, I've had similar problems when some of the
Windows Clients installed Norton Internet Security... one computer
with the Internet firewall w
Why W2k is trying to connect as guest is anyone's guess... But
regardless, your problems will probably go away once you have a valid
guest account...
Find out what the Unix user for your guest account is, (Samba
defaults to nobody) and set the guest accout option in smb.conf.
On Thu, Mar 04, 2
You want security = share in your global section. This is probably a
bad idea if your network interface Samba will be listening too will be
exposed to an untrusted network.
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 12:36:51PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> I'm running Debian/stable with Sam
As much as I would like to see a slew of copyright infringement claims
get filed against SCO, from my reading of the GPL, violations of the
license only terminates your right to distribute the software which
was violated. AFAIK, the only GPL software who's license SCO has
arguably violated, to dat
The standard internet sharing firewall scripts will do this and then
some automagically. See www.netfilter.org for examples.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:03:36PM +0100, Andreas Schildbach wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Is it possible to configure the packet filter for Linux kenel 2.4.x in a
> way s
What are your default IP tables rules? Do you Drop instead of Reject?
If so, try chanding your policies to Reject connections from the local
network that you don't accept. Optionally, log the rejected
connections to see what port Window is trying to talk to, and later,
reject rather than drop th
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, and assume that the message
flood was an accident, and the annoying 'loud' subject line is just
ignorance of netiquette.
Your question is more appropriate to cups than to Samba.
Use smbclient print to send a file to a remote printer.
However, the file has
I can't speak for everyone, but you will likely have to contact SCO
for any support or packages. SCO has openly made itself the 'enemy'
of any and all Open Source developers and supporters. Your best
chance for community help is to migrate your server platform to
something else.
Sorry.
On Fri,
Hi Lary
You can get around it by sending a blank password. (ie, just press
enter). Since you enabled guest ok, logins with bad passwords will go
to guest account (default is nobody) and all should be well. (If the
login prompt asks for a Username as well as a password, just put anything)
As for
More specifically, it's a spam message that was crafted carefully
enough to pass the (usually very effective) spam filters on the list.
I'm sure the filters will be updated in good time.
Patience, folks. This really isn't worth the blood pressure
medication.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 08:10:36AM
The smbfs File System is part of the Linux Kernel, and not Samba. It
likely has trouble with Large files. There are patches and what not
to get around this but they are not supported by Samba. Try using the
samba tools (smbclient or smbtar) and see if that works.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 02:38:2
smbfs is part of the Linux kernel and not Samba, and may not support
large files. The official answer to this question is "use
smbclient". Personally, I find split to be a great way to manage tar
files.
Example. tar -cz data/ | split -b 1024m - /mnt/share/bckp/bckp.tar.gz.
To untar the archive
On the other hand, it's only a matter of time before Samba becomes a
legal target for SCO. (Tongue firmly in cheek, but sadly truthful)
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 07:35:18PM +, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:18:13AM -0800, Jason Adams wrote:
> > With all this DMCA crud, is sa
As an unrelated, and posibly easy, work-around. Are you able to pipe
the file through the split command as you back it up? Even when I
have everythign working with large files, I find splitting my backup
files at 1GB just makes them easier to work with all around.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 07:55:5
Join the list, or did you maybe also post a message?? If you posted a
message, your message, along with your FROM: address, got forwarded to
untold thousands of people, some of whom, unforutnately, are infected
with Swen. Not much to do about it but wait this virus out. the good
news is, it's on
Err no no no... You cannot have the same computer (netBIOS name) on two different IP
addresses. Maybe if you tell us what you are trying to achieve with this bizzare
setup, we can advise a way to achieve it.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:46:06PM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> I have probl
I always wondered how much mindless, unthinking and thankless abuse it
would take to provoke a response.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 04:49:14PM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jared Rypka-Hauer wrote:
>
> | Objectively, I'm
> | guessing tha
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 02:27:10PM -0500, Jim Morris wrote:
If people want to hide their return e-mail address to avoid this
problem, they are free to do so. Just create something creative for
your From:. Most decent e-mail clients will allow you to either change
From: on an individual message *
level2 oplocks defautls to yes unless otherwise specified. To fix
this neatly, put both oplocks=no and level2 oplocks = no in your
Global section. Then add oplocks = yes and level2 oplocks = yes to
the one share you want to enable oplocks on. Testparm should then no
longer complain.
On Wed, Oc
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 09:02:15AM +1200, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Jason Joines wrote on Friday, 5 September 2003 7:02 a.m.:
> >All of our user authentication is done via LDAP. We have an all
> > Linux backend and tons of windows desktops. We've just started
> > getting a few people to move to
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 04:06:48PM -0300, Daniel wrote:
> Thanks for your help, but after some times Samba Stop to work
> and my Fible giga too.
>
> Could you help?
Sorry, but that's not nearly enough information, and I'm not the best
person to help with this kind of problem.
It's possible I mis
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:34:29PM -0300, Daniel wrote:
> Hi list i am using RH9 with original samba and it is using all most all
> memory in my system, i have 1g.
> When a write a file in there look`s like he write in memory!
>
> what could i do?
Nothing, this is correct behaviour for Linux whic
Indeed, a more complete explanation:
The text file format is, believe it or not, different
between Windows and Unix.
In Windows, lines end in CR and LF (or maybe that's LF and
CR, whatever). In Unix there is only a LF, the CR
is assumed. (Carriage Return and Line Feed.)
FTP will usually tranfe
Agreed,, ext3 is used in lots of situations where Reiser would probably be
a better choice
As for nobody loosing data,,, I don't really think it matters what
Filesystem you have if your system decides to stick random bits on the
hard drive. Staying away from any of them won't help much.
On Fr
Do you have some facts to back up that load of FUD? By all accounts I've
ever seen, Ext. 3 has been stable for *long* time before it was even
included in the stock Kernel tree.
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Dragan Krnic wrote:
mtime being changed is beyond the pale. I suspect ext3
is the problem. I hear
Create Mask 660 will remove executable bits from any saved file, as
advertized. However, since Samba normally maps archive attribute to
executable permission in Unix, this would break the archive attribute.
I would use
create mask = 760
force create mode = 660
This will ensure that the user and
You've only seen corruption on files of .exe type, while you have data
files regularly being copied back and forth? My first guess would be to
check and double check for a virus on any pc that has access to that
share.
There is an older Dos virus I've seen around that will mess up installers
and
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:40:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Rashkae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Marco De Vitis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Samba] oplock problem on NTUSER.DAT
Hi Marco
Try to veto oplocks for that file.
In the global section of your s
define your create mask as 0760. Create mask does not give or add
permissions to files, it takes them away. Ergo, by removing the execute
bit from the create mask, Samba always removes the execute bit. Maybe
what you wanted is "force create mode"?. Force Create mode 0660 would
ensure that user
By default Samba v. 2.x (since the version was not mentioned, I'm assuming
the post refers to a recent stable version) uses un-encrypted passwords.
Windows 2K, on the other hand, will not send unencrypted passwords over
the network without a registry hack.
Instructions on setting up encrypted pass
The the cited sample, WINDOWS means a PC with the WINDOWS Operating System
installed. In this example, The Widows PC is acting as a domain
controller for a different domain.
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Matt Seitz wrote:
Thanks for replying to my question. However, I am still confused.
Rafal Szczesn
For that matter, why would smbd (but not the system logs) be deleted in
the first place?
Jun 30 2:37am
They hang the man and flog the woman
That steal the goose from off the common,
But let the greater villain loose
That steals the common from the go
The parameter you want to set is "force create mode = 0777" or 0666 if you
don't want to set the execute bit. this will affect files only, not
directories. It's somewhat difficult to explain (and took me about 2
years to wrap my head around it.), but create mode will remove unwanted
permission at
You know your software is a success when people's wishlists include
documenting how to fix the 'competitor's' software.
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Jonathan Johnson wrote:
In some future version of the Samba help file, it would be nice if for each
option the equivalent (if applicable) Windows registry
I'm fairly certain that smbmount requires the NetBIOS
hostname as the server name, not the IP Address. (If smb is
unable to find the IP with the standard resoution
order/mechanisms, one can be specified with an option.)
Also, if you are trying to mount a share, you need to
specify the share. Kon
That's nice. I guess it's a good thing that SigTerm (Sig 15) is the
default signal for killall. (Almost like you would expect, no?)
On 6 Jun 2003, Oscar A. Valdez wrote:
>From the smbd man page:
"To shut down a user's smbd process it is recommended that SIGKILL (-9)
NOT be used, except as a
Please consider this a request for enlightenment
Why would anyone want to do something like this?
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 02:24:55PM -0300, Laura Zwaig wrote:
> Hello, I read this message just today. I am interested in running MS SQL
> with the dat
lem. The office network users' keep
yelling at me because of that!
Is there a way to fix this? (I know, I know, it's a client bug, but is there
a server workaround for it?)
Regards,
Gaston Dassieu Blanchet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Rashkae"
Must be pointed out however, that removing write bit from the directory
will meet the objective, it will also make it impossible for users to
create new files.
On Thu, 8 May 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 02:22:00AM +, John H Terpstra wrote:
> On Tue, 6 May 2003, Joseph
service while
waiting for the client reply...
Gaston Dassieu Blanchet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Rashkae" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Boogerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Rashkae" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "John H Terpstra" &l
On the issue of quoting, I notice that many people prefer
that previous messages be clipped or trimmed. I, personally
prefer a long trail of quotes.
I do not read most of the hundreds of messages I receive in
my inbox, and I'm too lazy to sort them into neat little
archives as they come in. Read
If your moving the files *to* the Samba Server, then this error is
happening because the file is in use on the W2K client. I would suspect
an anti-virus software. Try disabling any auto-protect. It might also be
Explorer scanning all the exe's for icon information. I'm not really
certain how I
Courtesy of a quick google search.
http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/~errror/smbfs-lfs.html
On Thu, 29 May 2003, [iso-8859-1] djfogbr wrote:
Hi all,
We have a Debian Linux 3.0, running kernel 2.4.18, and all filesystems are formatted
as ext3.
My problem is: when I try to mount an w2k share in this mac
WordPad doens't seem to have problems with Unix text file, should be on
every Windows computer.
Emacs doesn't have problems with Dos text files, should be easy to find
for whatever platform your working on.
As your subject points out, there are some simple scripts (fromdos, todos)
that will conve
The default configuration of samba should try to map the guest account to
user nobody. The guest account is important for various smb functions,
is is probably *always* used by smbd and nmbd. One of this is probably
crashing if it cannot find the guest account user. Check your logs to see
if any
As root, run pkgtool, choose Remove package, scroll down to Samba, and
remove.
Download source Tarball for latest stable samba (2.2.8, I believe), and
follow INSTALL destructions.
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Iadicicco wrote:
Hello all,
Well I have had it with this version of samba, Can anyone tell
If you don't need anything fancy, I've had excellent performance from the
StarTech Desktop switches. These are dirt cheap (often comparable to a
hub) and have always worked well for me.
Mar 21 4:31pm
They hang the man and flog the woman
That steal t
both ends manually into a particular duplex setting instead of
relying on auto-negotiation. (If you're using a hub, you should be in
half-duplex mode, period.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Adkins II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:26 AM
&g
Finding out how to tune the EXT3 journaling method would be good. That
information has eluded my searches as well...
However, before you fiddle with your file system, you should really
investigate what your problem really is. Unfortunately, you assertian
that you do not have network problems bec
Yikes, I was never even aware of this issue. Unfortunately, it looks like
you need more than just a glibc recompile. This article may be of value
to you if you attempt this course:
http://radu.rendec.ines.ro/howto/32groups.html
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Mark Bainter wrote:
Mark Bainter [EMAIL PROT
Question: why would one tar and not simply cp -a?
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ghosting
Why, you are useing linux.
Boot your system from cd.
Make the filesystem on the new hd
mke2fs .
Mount the old and the new hd, eg.:
mkdir /OLD
mkdir /NEW
Create a user on your Samba Box, create a share that is accessible to that
user, then use the username parameter so that whatever user the Windows
client sends, Samba will check the password against the user you created.
Mar 16 8:04pm
They hang the m
Have you followed the steps to enable encrypted passwords on the Samba
server? Also, posting your smb.conf file might be helpful.
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Laura West wrote:
Hello,
I am unable to map My Redhat 8.0 share from Windows XP Professional. I
get the error "The specified server cannot pe
Have you tried tranfering files both ways with ftp to rule out any
possible network configuration errors?
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Norman Zhang wrote:
Hi Darek,
Your config looks good. I don't have any clues yet. Do you have the latest
update from Samba? Does the slow transfer works for small files
If your going to be using samba to host foxpro files, I think you should
deffinately update to a newer version.. I forget at what recent point in
time, but Jerry announced a very important fix (spin locks?) that were
checked in recently to prevent fox pro database corruption. I don't think
it has
These sound more like OX X user interface quirks to me. (And would
therefore have nothing to to with Samba). Since you have Win9x computers
on the network, have you tried creating a share on them and connecting to
them with OX X. Is the behaviour any noticeably different?
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003
I don't know why the Samba documentation suggests not using Wins Support.
It is by far a more reliable mechanism that broadcasts for Windows
networks to find hosts, and is relatively painless to set up. You only
need 1 computer with the Wins support on, the others would all have a Wins
Server = Ip
I have to wonder which, at this point causes more congestion and stress to
e-mail systems. E-mail viruses, or aggresive Anti-Virus programs that
are configured to allert everyone. Is this a configurable option in AV
software... Should people start pressuring AV companies to change this
behaviour?
hfully the Professional I consulted
was... well... a "Linux extremist" a.k.a. "Penguin Nazi". ;-)
I leave it to the reader to draw further conclusions in regards to the
file size issue.
Rashkae wrote:
> Umm, no, M$ file size reporting is
Umm, no, M$ file size reporting is to the byte and perfect accurate.
Jan 22 9:27pm
They hang the man and flog the woman
That steal the goose from off the common,
But let the greater villain loose
That steals the common from the goose.
--English fol
Samba doesn't do data conversion of any kind.. Ftp, however,might be
converting from Unix text format to Dos text format if it's in text mode
instead of binary mode. Is this a text file created in Unix that you are
trying to open in a Windows program? Or a file you uploaded to the Unix
server via
Nope, this has nothing to do with user owned processes. What this does,
mean, however, is that the users are trying to share the files with
multiple computers with oplocks enabled. You should search this mailing
list archive for discussions ad-nauseum about oplocks.
_
How does your Samba box know about the WINS server? (Unless, of course,
you neglected to post your *complete* smb.conf)
Dec 19 12:57pm
They hang the man and flog the woman
That steal the goose from off the common,
But let the greater villain loose
Th
try adding a -f to your cp (For force). That will prevent cp from
prompting you to overwrite the files.
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Kevin Brown wrote:
I do this manually:
smbmount //Beverley/C /home/data
pwd: "insert pwd"
cp -ruv /home/samba/public /home/data
smbumount /home/data
This lets me do the f
Why not disable oplocks in Samba for the share where the database is
stored? Seems simpler than reg hacks on every client.
Nov 20 5:42pm
They hang the man and flog the woman
That steal the goose from off the common,
But let the greater villain lo
n,
But let the greater villain loose
That steals the common from the goose.
--English folk poem, circa 1764
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, John H Terpstra wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Rashkae wrote:
> John, Please ignore this question from someone who probaby doesn't know
> enough to make
John, Please ignore this question from someone who probaby doesn't know
enough to make sound statements, and who hasn't really followed the list
closely lately
Has there ever been an explanation found for the brief rash of people who
had tidbits of Samba log file data inserted in their network
Reply to all usually works rather well with any and all MUA's Of
course, people who are direct recipients have to suffer receiving two
copies of the message... (And how I feel for their horrible pain and
inconvenience.)
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Eric wrote:
On 10/18 10:24, Yura Pismerov wrote:
>
smbmount will do this on Linux systems with smbfs support compiled in
kernel.
There is another software package that will do this for other Unices.
Unfortunately, I cannot remember what it is called. (I believe that it's a
commercial package.0
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Rick von Richter wrote:
Is th
I'm sorry. I wasn't paying attention. I thought that was the confirmation
e-mail you were replying to.
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Rashkae wrote:
Way to go Billy
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Billy O'Connor wrote:
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
inst
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
