On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 06:44:35PM -0400, Jason Valenzuela wrote:
> I am having a SERIOUS problem with our new 2.2.5 server. In fact I will
> probably be forced to move to a Windows 2000 Server platform, as the samba
> server is practically useless. Work on any files on the share cannot be
> d
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 09:14:01AM -0400, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
> >
> > However, if a user selects a password that is too short,
> > he/she will get a misleading error message saying that
> > the _old_ password is wrong.
> >
> > This occurs both when the user is on a w2k machine or
> > on
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 06:21:21AM -0400, Yura Pismerov wrote:
>
>
> Stephan Pfeiffer wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > how can i add more than one wins server in the smb.conf file? "wins server =
> > server1, server2" does not work. also "wins server = server1 server 2" not work.
> > only one entry
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 10:44:04PM -0400, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 18:53, Billy O'Connor wrote:
> > Bradley, is the new testparm program from the same build getting a
> > segment violation?
>
> it segfaults - maybe i'm missing a
> dependency or something?
No, its just
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 06:26:07PM -0500, Nathaniel N. Petersen wrote:
> SAMBA VERSION: 2.2.4
> I reported this to my supervisor, and he asked what version of Samba I
> was using. I told him version 2.2.3a. Well, he says that I shouldn't
> use an "alpha" version of Samba.
Just for the record
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 02:40:14AM -0400, lists wrote:
> Hello -
>
> 1) Can I set up a group whose members are automatically able to install
> software on all workstations in the samba domain?
Yes
(see 'domain admin group')
> 2) Does domain admins group confer to its members file access to a
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:32:24AM +0200, Pascal Schelcher wrote:
>
> > I don't particularly mind, but just make sure its not the default.
> >
> > Remember, those 8.3 paths are in all sorts of .ini files and registry keys
> > on the clients, so we are going to have to keep this bugger alive for
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 02:51:38PM +1000, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
>
> I'll try it once I download samba from CVS. I wasn't able to patch it as
> I'm using samba 3.0a17 - not CVS.
>
> Gonzalo.
3.0-alpha17 is really getting quite old, but due to some things at the samb.org
end we havn't released a
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:14:13PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:24:55PM +1000, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 18:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:00:44PM +1000, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> > > > Sorry Andrew to hassle you ag
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:24:55PM +1000, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 18:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:00:44PM +1000, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> > > Sorry Andrew to hassle you again.
> > >
> > > Just one more question. I noticed in the logs that it che
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 06:06:36PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> This is a problem with the current mangling algorithm used in 2.2.4.
> There is a much better one available for 3.0. Gerry - I could back
> port this to 2.2.5 reasonably easily.
>
> Comments ?
I don't particularly mind, but j
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:07:22AM -0700, G. Armour Van Horn wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I'm on section 3.2 (page 7) of the SAMBA-LDAP PDC HowTo and am getting
> errors. This is on a brand-new install on RedHat 7.2, using
> openldap-2.0.23-4.i386.rpm, openldap-clients-2.0.23-4.i386.rpm, and
> openlda
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:00:44PM +1000, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> Sorry Andrew to hassle you again.
>
> Just one more question. I noticed in the logs that it checks to see if
> computername$ exists, and if it doesn't it tries to add it. The error
> message is:
>
> "NO user RID specified on accou
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 03:27:54PM +1000, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 15:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:56:09PM +1000, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 14:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Ah, right. So even if I do 'admin users = @d
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:56:09PM +1000, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 14:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ah, right. So even if I do 'admin users = @domadm' I still need to
> create a 'root' user in the ldap tree?
No, you should be able to get away without 'root'. But this is in
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:14:13PM +1000, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-05-28 at 18:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:09:12AM +1000, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> > > Hi All
> > >
> > > I've compiled Samba 3.0 alpha 17 using --with-ldapsam. In smb.conf I've
> > > got:
>
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:43:14PM -0700, Cook, Steven C wrote:
> With smbmount/smbmnt/smbumount setuid root, the following command:
>
> [sccook@dpcv-valhalla32 sccook]$ smbmount //dpswpgfs03/install netmnt -o
> username=sccook,workgroup=amr
>
> Gives the error:
>
> libsmb based programs must *
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 08:16:17AM +, Parvatam Venkata Jagannadha Rao wrote:
>
>
> Hi ,
> could any one tell samba user authenticate from mysql database and give
> permissions to read write ane execute and at the same time it should browse
> in window Network Neighborhood and authentciate w
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:09:12AM +1000, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I've compiled Samba 3.0 alpha 17 using --with-ldapsam. In smb.conf I've
> got:
>
> passdb backend = ldapsam
> ldap admin dn = "cn=Manager,o=Sambatest,c=AU"
> ldap suffix = c=AU
> ldap ssl = off
>
> ... and the admin dn
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 01:06:43PM +1000, Daniel Frencham wrote:
>
> > >Quick hack: Use the 'lpq command' smb.conf option to instead run a shell
> > >script that eats the first line.
>
> Already done that, but management want a cleaner solution.
Then don't use LPQ. LPQ is a *hack*, its not a
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 12:09:47PM +1000, Daniel Frencham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having problems with the queue on a Tru64 box running Samba 2.2.4.
>
> When the queue is viewed from a client machine it displays a print job with
> fields equivalent to the first line the lpq command outputs.
>
> F
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:44:41AM +0100, Juer Lee wrote:
> Hi, All,
>
> I upgraded my samba to 2.2.4 recently. There is one question about
> trusted domain.
> If I set 'winbind use default domain' to yes
This feature is not supported in Samba 2.2.4.
The fact that this paramater exists at all
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 10:46:53AM +1000, David Balnaves wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using samba for a while now with relatively simple configurations.
> I do however have a few questions:
>
> * When using encrypted passwords with samba, is it possible to authenticate
> users using the Unix user
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 09:20:24AM -0600, Russell Jungwirth wrote:
> These are the specific error message I get in log.winbindd when I run these
> commands:
> getent passwd:
> [2002/02/05 09:00:26, 0] nsswitch/winbindd.c:process_loop(613)
> process_loop: Invalid request size (5) send, should be
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 10:39:42AM +0200, Dirk ALLAERT wrote:
> You are running samba in unencrypted mode. You need to add a registry
> key to your client (EnablePlainPasswd). This key allows a windows 98 or
> later to connect to a fileserver in unencrypted mode. You can find the
> registry keys i
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:17:39AM -0500, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I understand the reasons for getting rid of --with-ssl
>
> Unfortunately, we are currently using it.
>
> Are there any instructions on how to set up and stunnel
> for samba?
I sent some suggestions to one of the lists
This message is a warning:
--with-ssl will die.
Ok, thats enough with the dramatics, but the general consensus amoungst the
samba team is that --with-ssl really isn't a particulary smart idea, and
it is better implmented by external tools.
So what is --with-ssl exactly? And why kill it?
--
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 10:09:34AM -0600, Ivan Van Laningham wrote:
> Hi All--
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 07:13:38AM -0400, Jerry M. Howell II wrote:
> > > just how the hell did this get on this list???
> > >
> > > g
> > >
> >
> > I understand its quite simple
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 04:28:22PM -0600, Daniel Pasono wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> We are running Samba 2.0.7 on Solaris 8 with a Windows 2000 PDC in
> mixed-mode with a couple of NT BDCs.
> We are getting random authentication failures from Samba that are
> stopping people from accessing their home
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 01:40:15PM -0400, Tim Longo wrote:
>
> I am running a samba server on a unix machine with many windows 2k clients.
> If I disable net bios on my Win2000 client, I cannot access my samba shares
> anymore. Is there some way I should configure my samba server so that
> Windo
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 07:13:38AM -0400, Jerry M. Howell II wrote:
> just how the hell did this get on this list???
>
> g
>
I understand its quite simple - it doesn't 'look' like spam - in particular
it wasn't just HTML (one of the main tests for spam)
Andrew Bartlett
--
To unsubscribe
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 07:29:52PM -0400, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
> I think i've got the new add machine script working
> since the user is created okay
> has anybody actually done this with samba3?
> I have a level 10 log but its 10k lines so i won't post it here unless
> somebody wants it
>
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 09:30:15AM +0200, Rasmus Nielsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I got a samba PDC up and running, everything works great, but whenever one
> of my users installs win2k/xp on his client machine I have to add that
> machine to the domain. I was wondering, if I disable winbind is it then
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 02:25:13PM -0500, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I am trying to compile sambe with SSL on my RedHat 7.2 machine.
> The Redhat installation is a fresh install.
>
> Here is what I did:
> Made sure that samba was not previously installed by typing
> rpm -q samba
>
> cd /
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 05:20:20PM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May 2002, alice wang wrote:
>
> >
> > Does the winbindd shipped in Samba 2.2.3a work
> > correctly against a Samba PDC?
>
> No.
Works for a Samba 3.0 or HEAD PDC.
> > Samba member servers, how can I centralize the acco
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 12:22:53PM -0400, Jason Stewart wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
> Read the smb.conf man page and look at the encrypt passwords = yes option.
> Also, you can compile SSL-enabled Samba with the --with-ssl option at
> ./configure time. There is more info about this in the smb.conf m
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 07:32:53PM +0200, Axel Machens wrote:
> Hi samba admins !
>
> This day after I boot my samba 2.2.3a on SuSE 7.3, I become the
> error message when I run the command:
>
> pdbedit -l
> Bind faild: Inappropriate authentication
>
> as pdbedit -a -u newuser it comes the same
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 11:36:37PM +0200, Ivan Gustin wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I found a workaround for the problem I mentioned before.
>
> I renamed [homes] section to [personal], and set 'browseable = yes'. This
> change wouldn't create new share for each logged user and produce so many
> shares
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 11:15:37PM +0200, Ivan Gu¹tin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've already saw that many other users have the same problem, so I am
> interested if somebody have adequate solution for this.
>
> In short: Samba 2.2.3a, clients Windows 2000 Pro, with many users on the
> same machines. Whe
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 07:08:10PM +0200, Thomas Stegbauer wrote:
> hi all,
>
> some days ago there was a discussion, where the pwdMustChange attribute
> was set to 0 to force the account to change the password at the next
> logon. unfortunatly samba did not set back the pwdMustChange, so the
> n
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 03:45:10PM -0400, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 15:22, Pascal Schelcher wrote:
> > Thanks for your answer.
> >
> > My "ldap suffix" parameter has value : "ou=Company,c=Fr"
> > Where can I specify the LDAP server to use ?
> >
> there is a parameter ca
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 08:28:55AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
> On 25 Apr 2002, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 16:56, Axel Machens wrote:>
> > > But I ´m not shure about the working with machine accounts to join my
> > > domain named samba.
> > I assume you are using sa
> * Can't reboot Win2k boxes from Linux
>
> Apparently warpanel issues an RPC to Win2k clients to get them to
> reboot. Don't think Samba is capable of this(?), and I tried running
> warpanel in wine... no go either. Is there another way to reboot Win2K
> clients from Linux (preferably as n
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:13:25AM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> Tuesday, April 09, 2002, 1:40:40 AM, you wrote:
>
> >> BTW, could I use libsmbclient for cli_logon() and other functions?
> >> I've looked at samba code, and understand, that forwarding of pakcets
> >> need RPC
44 matches
Mail list logo
