[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated

2024-04-21 Thread Jo Sutton
- commit 20ce68f15940b3e8d4d53c10a71729b16cfb3908 Author: Jo Sutton Date: Fri Apr 19 14:16:03 2024 +1200 tests/krb5: Test retrieving a denied gMSA password over an unsealed connection Signed-off-by: Jo Sutton Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett Autobuild

[Samba] Samba + Windows 7 Foreign Language

2011-03-05 Thread Jo�o Os�rio
Hello, My network was running smoothly with XP machines and Samba 3.0.24 as PDC. But now some Win7 Pro (Portuguese) machines arrived. Using the info from http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7, I upgraded samba to 3.5.7, and applyed the Windows 7 fixes described there on one of the new

[Samba] binaries = 3.3.4 for fedora core 3

2009-11-27 Thread jo / ak
Hi, I'm using Samba (currently samba-3.0.10-1.fc3) in an intranet environment under Fedora Core 3. I learned that I have to upgrade to Samba 3.3.4 or higher in order to join new Windows 7 clients to the domain. Hints to binaries for this setting would be greatly appreciated. Cheers, Jo

Re: [Samba] binaries = 3.3.4 for fedora core 3

2009-11-27 Thread jo / ak
Hi Moray, Since we're in a pretty small intranet environment I chose to postpone the OS upgrade. Thanks to the pointer to sernet - they have centos/rhel 3/4/5 releases. Which one could be compatible to Fedora Core 3? Cheers, Jo Am Fr, 27 Nov 2009 schrieb Moray Henderson moray.hender

[Samba] MS SQL server and samba

2005-10-21 Thread Jo Keen
Hans We have tried to do exactly the same thing this week. Did you manage to get a solution and if so please could you post it up. Thanks Jo This email has been independently scanned for viruses and any virus software has been removed using McAfee anti-virus software

Re: [Samba] nmbd died: smb_panic2(1385)

2004-09-28 Thread jo / ak
Can you compile with -g and send in a full stack backtrace so we can see exactly where it's failing and if this is fixed in 3.0.7 ? Thank you for the suggestion, but I never compiled samba, simply used the redhat rpm. So I will install 3.0.7 and watch if the error occurs again. - Jo

[Samba] Only BUILTIN accounts working on 2k3 AD

2004-08-27 Thread Jo Bailey
+Administrators BUILTIN+Account Operators BUILTIN+Backup Operators BUILTIN+Users Any pointers on what logs to look at and what to look for would be great too. I'm still learning! TIA Jo _ FREE* Month of Movies with FOXTEL Digital: http

[Samba] join domain - ou=people searched for machine accounts?

2004-08-15 Thread jo / ak
When I try to join a domain from a win2k client to a samba 3.0.5 PDC, I get the message User not found. I use ldapsam, which works fine in all other respects. The strange thing is that the smbldap-useradd scripts terminates with 0, the machine account is created under ou=systems in the ldap

[Samba] Object Picker incomplete

2004-06-03 Thread Jo Ann Merritt
Back in January someone posted the question about he inability to add any Domain object to a Local group on a Windowx XP PRO| SP1 machine). Has anyone found the answer to be able to do this? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions:

[Samba] vfs recycle and symlinks

2004-02-24 Thread De Troy, Jo [TIBBE]
/private/2.6.3-mm3.bz2) [2004/02/24 10:05:07, 3, pid=29502, effective(10044, 10108), real(0, 0)] smbd/process.c:process_smb(890) Transaction 165 of length 44 Best Regards, Jo -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Samba] Cannot start smbd and nmbd demons

2003-08-14 Thread jo
can you do a truss on that ? I can compare tomorrow we also have sol 9 Jo On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 11:31:30 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running a Samba 2.x.x on a Solaris 9 and I get this when I start the demon at the command line. # /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd -D ld.so.1: /usr

[Samba] Re: Finally winbind on RH9 working, but why ?

2003-08-14 Thread jo
? Thanks in advance... the full story is below but I guess it's to long for anyone to read *grin* Jo De Baer NEOlabs - http://www.neolabs.be - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Samba] Re: Finally winbind on RH9 working, but why ?

2003-08-14 Thread jo
Since your email address ends with samba.org, I'll take your word for it *grin*. Sorry for all my mails then, but I did not know that...I guess most manuals these days are kinda hybrid. up to 3.0 then! Thanks for the clarification!!! Jo De Baer On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:23:59 -0500 (CDT) Gerald

Re: FINALLY ....[WAS Re: [Samba] Re: DID ANYBODY HERE...

2003-08-14 Thread jo
Hi jo here again ( Mr. FINALLY ) I think indeed this also applies to me, if i do 'getent group' i get [EMAIL PROTECTED] var]# tail -f log.winbindd [2003/08/05 11:48:14, 0] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgrent(640) could not lookup domain group Domain Admins [2003/08/05 11:48:14, 0

Re: [Samba] Re: Finally winbind on RH9 working, but why ?

2003-08-06 Thread jo
group' apparently DOES work, so I have no idea why this call is in fact executed in my case. Probable he takes a wrong turn somewhere I am trying to trace back the call to find that wrong turn, but if anyone can give me a hint here please do, it's a big ... Jo De Baer Maybe

Re: [Samba] Re: Finally winbind on RH9 working, but why ?

2003-08-06 Thread jo
e.g. if someone running 2.2.8a successfully would have the time to run 'getent group' on a domain member and garantee me that he does NOT see the same messages appearing in the log for that member on the samba PDC, that would tell me I'm looking in the right direction.., *grin* Jo De Baer

[Samba] Re: Finally winbind on RH9 working, but why ?

2003-08-05 Thread jo
getting there... *grin* Thanks Jo On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 10:42:50 -0500 Lahners, Jeremy wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] admin]# wbinfo -u administrator Guest TsInternetUser [EMAIL PROTECTED] admin]# wbinfo -g DHCP Users DHCP Administrators WINS Users Domain Computers Domain Controllers Schema

[Samba] Finally winbind on RH9 working, but why ?

2003-08-04 Thread jo
:501::/dev/null:/bin/false root:x:1:1:root:/home/MYGROUP/root:/bin/false jo:x:10001:1::/home/MYGROUP/jo:/bin/false [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# getent group DOES NOT SHOW THE win GROUPS... ANY IDEA WHY? Where are the groups stored on the samba pdc [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# wbinfo -u

Re: [Samba] RedHat Samba 2.2.7a-8.9.0 RPM complete?

2003-08-04 Thread jo
for winbind to run... Thanks Jo De Baer On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:54:59 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone have information or know how I can find out what option this rpm was built with? ie with winbind on... I still seem to be having odd winbind / samba / acl problems (cannot get perms

Re: [Samba] RedHat Samba 2.2.7a-8.9.0 RPM complete?

2003-08-04 Thread jo
at least figure out where the difference is *grin* 'later jo On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:29:36 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, It is indeed on RH9. Winbind does seen to run well, and it answers to wbinfo queries. I can post my smb.conf if it helps. Regards

Re: [Samba] Finally winbind on RH9 working, but why ?

2003-08-04 Thread jo
with the cache timeout causes a difference? Thanks in advance... the full story is below but I guess it's to long for anyone to read *grin* Jo De Baer On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 16:42:05 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, maybe (probably ??) it's me, but it took me more than a week to get winbindd

[Samba] Where and how do I get the fixes to 2.2.6?

2002-11-12 Thread Jo Bob
. - Original Message - From: Jo Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:06 PM Subject: Misterious problem after upgrading from 2.2.4 to 2.2.6 (possible bug?) Hi all, I upgraded a Samba file server which had been running version 2.2.4 to 2.2.6 a week ago

[Samba] Misterious problem after upgrading from 2.2.4 to 2.2.6 (possible bug?)

2002-10-29 Thread Jo Bob
Hi all, I upgraded a Samba file server which had been running version 2.2.4 to 2.2.6 a week ago. Since then I have had reports of a weird problem of files mysteriously becoming read only. I just looked into one of the users having this problem and it looked like all the write permissions