Hi,
We are using CTDB version 1.0.77 and yesterday we saw an instance of node
running into issues and banning itself to recover (as listed below):
node1:
2009/07/29 23:23:37.748251 [22371]: Banning node 0 for 300 seconds
2009/07/29 23:23:37.748263 [22371]: self ban - lowering our election
Hi,
Is there a timeframe when NFSv4 will be supported in CTDB (
http://ctdb.samba.org/)?
Thanks,
-Tim
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:08 PM, tim clusters tim.clust...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Does smbtorture have any issues operating in a Domain environment? I get
the following error even for simple tests
[r...@d2950-11 samba_tests]# ./smbtorture //D1950-01/global-share -U
TESTDOMAIN2+testuserc OPEN
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:45 PM, John H Terpstra j...@samba.org wrote:
On Thursday 29 January 2009 21:40:55 tim clusters wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:30 PM, tim clusters tim.clust...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I have a two server setup that acts as SMB as well as NFS servers
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Volker Lendecke
volker.lende...@sernet.dewrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 02:34:27PM -0700, tim clusters wrote:
Currently, a SMB server is able to handle sustained 300MB/s on writes and
200MB/s on reads. Performance remains constant as you scale clients
Hi,
Does smbtorture have any issues operating in a Domain environment? I get the
following error even for simple tests
[r...@d2950-11 samba_tests]# ./smbtorture //D1950-01/global-share -U
TESTDOMAIN2+testuserc OPEN
using seed 1233356434
Password:
host=D1950-01 share=global-share
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:30 PM, tim clusters tim.clust...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I have a two server setup that acts as SMB as well as NFS servers in
active/active configuration managed by CTDB(http://ctdb.samba.org/).
The write performance is around 100MB/s per client however the read
Hi,
I have a two server setup that acts as SMB as well as NFS servers in
active/active configuration managed by CTDB(http://ctdb.samba.org/).
The write performance is around 100MB/s per client however the read
performance is only 0.6MB/s (using Iozone benchmark). I use Windows 2003
Server as
Hi Michael,
I sincerely appreciate your detailed response.
We migrated from Active Directory 2008 + idmap backend=RID to Active
Directory 2003 + ServiceForUnix + idmap backend=AD and now we have Samba
clients authenticate/mount shares from CTDB managed servers.
Now, we are seeing strange case
Hi Michael,
Disabling sendfile smb.conf option seems to fix this issue (finger's
crossed :-)). Please see more detailed explanation in:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6019
Thanks for your guidance,
-Tim
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:21 AM, tim clusters tim.clust...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
the NFS
file, all the SMB clients can access. The SMB servers are managed via CTDB
authenticating via AD 2003.
Please advise.
Thanks,
-Tim
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Volker Lendecke
volker.lende...@sernet.dewrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 01:33:21PM -0700, tim clusters wrote:
Any idea
Hi,
I have a two server setup that acts as SMB as well as NFS servers in
active/active configuration managed by CTDB(http://ctdb.samba.org/).
When a file is updated by SMB clients(followed by file-close), other SMB
clients can see and modify the file. But when a NFS client (same user)
updates
Hi All,
Are there any special CTDB/SMB configuration settings/dependencies to manage
Winbind across CTDB managed servers authenticating via Active
Directory(AD)? An example would be Samba's IDMAP backend for Winbind: RID
vs. AD or tag Winbind to a primary CTDB node and point other nodes to
wrote:
Hi Tim,
tim clusters wrote:
Michael,
Thanks for your response.
You had indicated that only one node needs to join the cluster by
issuing
net ads join and CTDB will take care propagating to other nodes.
Iam authenticating CTDB nodes to Active Directory(AD) via Kerberos. Do I
want to set the defaults idmap config to s/th like:
idmap backend = tdb2
idmap uid = 100-2000
idmap gid = 100-2000
Cheers - Michael
tim clusters wrote:
Hi ,
I have set up a 2-node CTDB cluster serving NFS and CIFS authenticating
Windows and Linux users via Active
Hi,
Has anybody deployed a CTDB cluster(http://ctdb.samba.org/) successfully
with multiple nodes serving SMB simultaneously authenticating via Active
Directory(using Winbind)? If yes, can you please share /etc/samba/smb.conf
and /etc/sysconfig/ctdb?
Thanks in Advance,
-Tim
--
To unsubscribe
Hi,
Has anyone tried managing SMB servers via CTDB (http://ctdb.samba.org/)?
I have a setup with CTDB managing two SMB servers authenticating with Active
Directory via Winbind. The SMB is active on both the nodes. However, at a
given instance the Windows clients are able to mount only from one
Hi ,
I have set up a 2-node CTDB cluster serving NFS and CIFS authenticating
Windows and Linux users via Active Directory.
The setup works fine, except only one server in the CTDB-cluster is able to
join the AD domain at a given instance. If you manually add the other server
into AD, the already
18 matches
Mail list logo
