Re: [Samba] A simple stand-alone scenario but public share doesn´t work

2007-12-30 Thread Rolf Deenen
Dearest list, Thank you very much for all the helpfull suggestions and tips. As some of you pointed out that the config in itself seemed ok, i checked my assumptions once more. There i did a dreadfull discovery. It seems both ingrid and rolf weren't members of the group users. I thought

Re: [Samba] A simple stand-alone scenario but public share doesn´t work

2007-12-29 Thread Rolf Deenen
Ah, yes. Sorry about that. I tinkered so much that i accidentally must have placed browseable twice in the directive. I don´t think it matters much, because later the correct command is given: browseable = yes. I removed the browseable = no and restarted samba. It makes no difference.

Re: [Samba] A simple stand-alone scenario but public share doesn´t work

2007-12-29 Thread Markus Fischer
Hello Rolf To share the documents it is necessary to tell Samba itself who has access to the shares. If your shared users are in group user, you would have to specify in your share: valid users = @users force group = users alternatively you can specify: valid users = rolf ingrid Be

[Samba] A simple stand-alone scenario but public share doesn´t work

2007-12-28 Thread Rolf Deenen
Dear list, For a simple home-network i recently installed Debian Etch on an extra machine to act as server. It stores my mail, it acts as webserver, firewall, dns-, dhcp- and database-server. All of these services are running like a charm. The only thing left is to get samba running. Well, it

Re: [Samba] A simple stand-alone scenario but public share doesn´t work

2007-12-28 Thread Yan Seiner
Rolf Deenen wrote: [shared] comment = Shared Directories browseable = no path=/home/samba/Documents writable = yes create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 browseable = yes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL