Jeremy Allison wrote:
[2005/09/10 10:15:56, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(981)
Attempt to bind using schannel without successful serverauth2
[...]
This is on a 3.0.20 (with patches) PDC.
[...]
Right now it's informative - I'd like to see the traffic
that is causing it though.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 03:20:18PM +0200, Thomas Bork wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
[2005/09/10 10:15:56, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(981)
Attempt to bind using schannel without successful serverauth2
[...]
This is on a 3.0.20 (with patches) PDC.
[...]
Right now it's
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 12:37:30AM -0400, Chris wrote:
On Saturday 10 September 2005 03:55 pm, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:30:53AM -0400, Chris wrote:
Samba logs show many of these:
[2005/09/10 10:15:56, 0]
rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(981) Attempt to
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:53:19AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
The other interesting test would be to set the server deadtime to
zero (the default) - what do you have it set to in your smb.conf ?
Actually scratch that - it's hitting the auto disconnect if the
client has no resources open
Samba logs show many of these:
[2005/09/10 10:15:56, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(981)
Attempt to bind using schannel without successful serverauth2
[2005/09/10 10:26:04, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(981)
Attempt to bind using schannel without successful
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:30:53AM -0400, Chris wrote:
Samba logs show many of these:
[2005/09/10 10:15:56, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(981)
Attempt to bind using schannel without successful serverauth2
[2005/09/10 10:26:04, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(981)