On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 13:28, Joey Collins wrote: > > Good evening, > > On the bottom of page 53, section 4.1.2.2 in the SNIA spec > (http://www.snia.org/tech_activities/CIFS/CIFS-TR-1p00_FINAL.pdf), it > states if the dialect is NT LM 0.12 and extended security is off (I.e., > use "traditional" NTLMv2/NTLMv2 authentication w/o SecurityBlobs), the > SessionSetupAndX response is as shown in section 4.1.2.2 with a word > count = 4. However, what I have noticed is this is not the case, but > rather, if you are doing NTLMv2 or NTLMv1 authentication w/o extended > security, the SessionSetupAndX is really the one shown in 4.1.2.1 with a > word count = 3. I tried this a few times, using NT4.0 + SP 6a client > against NT4.0 + SP 6a, and Win2k + SP 3 against the NT4.0 + SP 6a server > and all resulted in the same SessionSetupAndX response--the one shown in > section 4.1.2.1 with a wc = 3. > > Am I doing something funky to get this result or is this in fact an > issue in the spec?
Given that's what Samba returns, I would knock it up as an error in the spec. I've CC'ed Steve French, so see if he knows how to get such errata into the next version. For detailed protocol questions, I would suggest joining the developers list - [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the developers IRC channel #samba-technical on irc.freenode.net. (NOTE to other list-members: These are for technical discussions of Samba internals, and is not a help channel) Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
